w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Veena Rani & Others v/s Purshottam Dass Sharma & Others


Company & Directors' Information:- S C SHARMA AND CO PRIVATE LTD [Active] CIN = U74899DL1948PTC001507

Company & Directors' Information:- SHARMA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999UP2008PTC035620

Company & Directors' Information:- K P SHARMA (INDIA) PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U51109WB1988PTC045569

Company & Directors' Information:- SHARMA CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909WB2017PTC220657

Company & Directors' Information:- P C SHARMA AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45201DL1981PTC012750

Company & Directors' Information:- J. R. SHARMA & COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U24211DL1966PTC004602

Company & Directors' Information:- M K SHARMA AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74994DL1982PTC014090

Company & Directors' Information:- SHARMA AND SHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74900DL2015PTC276949

Company & Directors' Information:- DASS & CO INDIA PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U51109WB1943PTC011220

Company & Directors' Information:- SHARMA & CO. PVT LTD. [Strike Off] CIN = U28991WB1949PTC018064

Company & Directors' Information:- VEENA LIMITED [Dissolved] CIN = U99999MH1955PLC009644

    RC.Rev. No. 703 of 2019 & CM. APPL. No. 240 of 2020

    Decided On, 30 January 2020

    At, High Court of Delhi

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

    For the Petitioner: Vijay Mishra, Advocate. For the Respondent: Vineet Kaushal, R.N. Sharma, Advocates.



Judgment Text


(Oral)

1. Petitioners impugn the order dated 08.05.2019 whereby the leave to defend application of the petitioners has been dismissed and eviction order passed.

2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondents on the ground of bona fide necessity under Section 14 (1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 seeking eviction of the petitioner from one room with area of 12’ x 10’ with covered small space for kitchen on 1st Floor of property bearing No.5/9, Singh Sabha Road, Shakti Nagar, Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed with the eviction petition.

3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that (i) there is no relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties, (ii) the tenanted premises having been let out for commercial purposes and petition under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act is not be maintainable, (iii) that there is no bona fide need of the respondent because 50 years ago, respondent had given a notice seeking possession from the petitioner and they have waited for 50 years to file the eviction petition, (iv) there are several tenants in the property and eviction petition has been filed only against the petitioner and he has been single out.

4. With regard to the first ground raised by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties, the rent controller in the impugned order has not noticed that Respondent/landlord had placed on record the sale deed executed by the DDA in favour of the father of the respondent as well as his brother. Brother of the father of the respondent was single and unmarried and on his demise, his share in the property devolved on the father of the respondents and on demise of the father, respondents had become the co-owners of the property. Rent Controller held that respondent had better title then the petitioner and accordingly held that the petition was maintainable.

5. Perusal of the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner, shows that the stand taken by the petitioner in the leave to defend application itself is that the petitioners are in possession of the premises as tenants for more than 50 years and it is further contended that they have been regularly paying the rent. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no relationship of landlord and the tenant is not even taken as a ground in the application seeking leave to defend. On the other hand, petitioner has not stated, if not the respondents, who is the landlord of the premises. This ground is not available to the petitioner.

6. Second ground raised by learned counsel for the petitioner is that the tenanted premises are commercial in nature and as such the petition is not maintainable. Once again it is seen that such plea has not been taken in the leave to defend application and even otherwise, said issue is no longer res integra, in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Satyawati Sharma (Dead) by LRs. vs. UOI & Anr. (2008) 5 SCC 2878.

7. The other contention that there is no bona fide necessity as the respondents had issued notice 50 years ago seeking possession and waited for 50 years to file the petition is also not sustainable. The notice dated 13.01.1969, which is relied on by learned counsel for the petitioner, was a notice demanding arrears of rent and possession. Even otherwise in 1969 no petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act could have been filed because the premises admittedly are commercial in nature and its only on account of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Satyawati Sharma (supra), wherein it is held that landlord can seek eviction of a tenant of commercial premises under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act.

8. Further, merely because a landlord does not file the petition seeking eviction even after giving notice does not preclude the landlord from filing a petition on the ground of bona fide necessity at later point of time.

9. The other contention raised by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been singled out no proceedings have been initiated against other tenants, is also without any merit. A landlord is the best judge of his requirement and it is open to the landlord to decide as to which premise is more suitable for his requirement. Neither the tenant nor the Court can dictate to the landlord as to which premises would be suitable. The choice is left to the landlord to choose.

10. Even otherwise, it is not the case of the petitioner that there is no necessity of the respondent or that the need is not bonafide or that any other suitable alternate accommodation is available to the respondent, which is vacant.

11. I find no infirmity in the view taken by the Rent Controller that on the affidavit filed in support of the application for leave to defend do

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

es not raise any triable issue. Petitioner has not been able to show any ground, which if proved, would disentitle the respondents from an order of eviction. 12. I find no merit in the petition. The petition is accordingly dismissed. 13. For the purposes of record, it is noted that respondents have already received possession of the tenanted premises on 19.12.2019 through warrants of possession issued by the executing court in execution of order dated 08.05.2019. 14. Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

16-10-2020 Umesh Kumar Sharma Versus State of Uttarakhand & Others Supreme Court of India
15-10-2020 Rajasthan State Road Development & Construction Corporation Limited Versus Piyush Kant Sharma & Others Supreme Court of India
08-10-2020 Chhabil Dass Agarwal Versus State of Sikkim & Others High Court of Sikkim
08-10-2020 Chhabil Dass Agarwal Versus State of Sikkim & Others High Court of Sikkim
23-09-2020 Charu Sharma & Others Versus Birla Sun Life Insurance Company Ltd., Maharshtra & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-09-2020 Arun Sharma Versus Roxann Sharma In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
08-09-2020 Arun Kumar Sharma Versus Adesh Goel & Others High Court of Delhi
07-09-2020 Suneeta Sharma Versus Greater Mohali Area Development Authority, Punjab & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
02-09-2020 All India Union Bank Officer, Staff Association Rep. by its General Secretary, AIBOA, Chennai Versus Brajeshwar Sharma, The Chief General Manager(HR) Union Bank of India, Mumbai High Court of Judicature at Madras
31-08-2020 Rajesh Kumar Sharma @ Rajesh Kumar Versus C.B.I. High Court of Delhi
26-08-2020 Oriental Insurance Company Limited Versus Nand Kishore Sharma & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
25-08-2020 Abhishek Sharma @ Chanchal Pandit Versus State of U.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
24-08-2020 Sanjay Kumar Sharma & Another Versus Union of India & Another High Court of Gauhati
24-08-2020 ICICI Bank, ICICI Bank Through Manager, Rajasthan Versus Ram Prakash Sharma National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
21-08-2020 H.N. Sharma & Anr versus Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors. High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-08-2020 Ishwar Dass Versus Bimla Devi & Others High Court of Himachal Pradesh
14-08-2020 Nipun Sharma Versus Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Sector 12, Chandigarh High Court of Punjab and Haryana
14-08-2020 Union of India & Another Versus M/s. K.C. Sharma & Co. & Others Supreme Court of India
11-08-2020 V.P. Sharma & Others Versus Dr. G.S. Kochar Surgeon Urologist) & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
11-08-2020 Vineeta Sharma V/S Rakesh Sharma and Others. Supreme Court of India
11-08-2020 Vineeta Sharma Versus Rakesh Sharma & Others Supreme Court of India
07-08-2020 Vijay Ramswarup Sharma Versus State of Gujarat High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
06-08-2020 Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd., Rajasthan Versus Kailash Chand Sharma National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
27-07-2020 Manish Sharma & Another Versus Urmila Arora High Court of Delhi
21-07-2020 Ex-Subedar Vinod Kumar Sharma Versus National Insurance Co. Ltd. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
21-07-2020 State Bank Of India Mini Secretariat Through Its Branch Manager Hisar Haryana Versus Sukh Dass National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
24-06-2020 Tara Prasad Sharma Versus State of Sikkim & Others High Court of Sikkim
23-06-2020 Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., Through The General Manager & Another Versus Narendra Kumar Sharma National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
22-06-2020 Ashok Sharma Versus State of Assam & Another High Court of Gauhati
17-06-2020 Aman Sharma Versus The Chief Election Commissioner & Another High Court of Madhya Pradesh
15-06-2020 Rajan Sharma & Another Versus Union of India & Another Supreme Court of India
02-06-2020 Prateek Sharma & Another Versus Union of India & Another High Court of Delhi
30-05-2020 Kshitiz Sharma Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
19-05-2020 Mukesh Sharma Versus C.V. Ramana High Court of for the State of Telangana
19-05-2020 Randhir Rambrij Sharma Versus Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation High Court of Judicature at Bombay
14-05-2020 Meena Sharma Versus Nand Lal & Another High Court of Delhi
06-05-2020 Kamla Sharma Versus North Delhi Municipal Corporation High Court of Delhi
29-04-2020 Anurag Sarmah @ Sharma Versus State of Assam & Another High Court of Gauhati
27-04-2020 Veena Versus State of Himachal Pradesh High Court of Himachal Pradesh
22-04-2020 Anand Sharma Versus State of Rajasthan & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
20-04-2020 Dr. Mahesh Sharma & Another Versus Cabinet Secretary, Govt. of India, Cabinet Secretariat, New Delhi & Others High Court of Rajasthan
15-04-2020 Sanjeev Sharma Versus State (N.C.T. of Delhi) High Court of Delhi
13-04-2020 Mamta Sharma & Another Versus State of Chhattisgarh Through The Chief Secretary, Chhattisgarh & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
08-04-2020 C.H. Sharma & Another Versus State of Maharashtra & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
08-04-2020 Mohmmad Yunus Versus Madho Prasad Sharma High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
30-03-2020 Prashant Sharma Versus State of Sikkim & Others High Court of Sikkim
23-03-2020 Rajasthan Public Service Commission & Others Versus Megha Sharma & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
20-03-2020 Anju Sharma Versus Sunita Kumari & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
18-03-2020 Shambhu Prasad Sharma Advocate Versus Renu Jogi High Court of Chhattisgarh
18-03-2020 State of M.P. & Others Versus Rajendra Kumar Sharma High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwailor
18-03-2020 Saurav Sharma Versus State of HP & Others High Court of Himachal Pradesh
18-03-2020 Vishvajeet Dass @ Vishvanath Das @ Vishwa Versus State High Court of Delhi
17-03-2020 Aashu Pandit @ Aashu Bajpai @ Aash Narayan Sharma Versus Union of India High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
13-03-2020 Unnati Bhardwaj & Another Versus K.P. Sharma High Court of Delhi
11-03-2020 Ajay Sharma & Others Versus Kulwant Singh High Court of Delhi
06-03-2020 Rampal Sharma & Others Versus State of Rajasthan & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
06-03-2020 Mithun Sharma Versus Tripura Gramin Bank & Others High Court of Tripura
05-03-2020 M/s. N.K. Enterprise, West Bengal & Another V/S Narayan Prasad Sharma & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
05-03-2020 Sancha Bahadur Subba Versus Ramesh Sharma High Court of Sikkim
04-03-2020 Ashok Kumar Sharma Versus Nirmaldas Manikpuri High Court of Chhattisgarh
04-03-2020 Amitabh Versus Amit Rghunandan Saran Sharma & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
28-02-2020 Dilip Kumar Sharma Versus State of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh
25-02-2020 Mahesh Kumar Sharma Versus The Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
24-02-2020 Sarwan Kumar Sharma Versus Ranjana Sharma @ Ranjana Rani & Another High Court of Delhi
19-02-2020 Bhupendra Sharma & Others Versus Union of India, Represented By The Secretary Ministry of Defence, New Delhi & Others High Court of Kerala
18-02-2020 M/s. Reliance General Insurance Company Versus Rakesh Sharma & Others Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission New Delhi
18-02-2020 ICICI Bank Ltd., Rajashtan & Others Versus Ravindra Kumar Sharma & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
17-02-2020 Ram Prakash Sharma Versus State of Bihar High Court of Judicature at Patna
17-02-2020 National Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus Veena Jain Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission New Delhi
14-02-2020 Vinay Sharma Versus Union of India & Others Supreme Court of India
13-02-2020 Harinarayan Sharma Versus Vijay Kumar Soni National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
12-02-2020 Umesh Chand Sharma & Others Versus Parsvnath Developers Limited National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
12-02-2020 Praveen Kumar Sharma Versus State of U.P. through its Principal Secretary (Home), Secretariat, Lucknow, U.P. & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
11-02-2020 Shashibala M. Sharma Versus ICICI Bank Ltd. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
11-02-2020 Baba Gopal Dass Sahib Talib Darvesh Versus State of NCT of Delhi & Others High Court of Delhi
10-02-2020 Mukulika Sharma & Others Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Secondary Education, Govt. of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
10-02-2020 Brahmacharimayum Achou Sharma & Others Versus The State of Manipur through the Chief Secretary-cum-Secretary (Power), Govt. of Manipur & Others High Court of Manipur
06-02-2020 Vipin Sharma Versus Securities and Exchange Board of India, SEBI Bhavan SEBI Securities amp Exchange Board of India Securities Appellate Tribunal
06-02-2020 Kanwar Pal Sharma Versus State (NCT of Delhi) High Court of Delhi
06-02-2020 Nitin Sharma Versus State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) High Court of Delhi
06-02-2020 Mahesh Kumar Sharma Versus The Principal, Vidya Niketan Birla Public School, Pilani District Jhunjhunu & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
05-02-2020 Union of India & Another Versus Vinay Sharma & Others High Court of Delhi
04-02-2020 Shubhash Kumar Sharma Versus Harish Chander Rawal National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
03-02-2020 Puroshattam Sharma Versus Executive Engineer, Gwalior North M.P. Madhya Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Co. Ltd. & Another Madya Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Bhopal
03-02-2020 Axis Bank Limited V/S Ravindra Kumar Sharma and Others. Debts Recovery Tribunal Delhi
31-01-2020 Ghat Talab Kaulan Wala Versus Baba Gopal Dass Chela Surti Dass (Dead) By Lr Ram Niwas Supreme Court of India
30-01-2020 Sanjeev Sharma Versus Aamir Jamal & Another National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
29-01-2020 Shivam Sharma Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Punjab and Haryana
27-01-2020 M/s. CNA Exports (P) Ltd. Versus Mansi Sharma & Others High Court of Delhi
27-01-2020 Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd., Mullanpur & Another Versus Sheshpal Sharma & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
23-01-2020 Bajrang Lal Sharma Versus C.K. Mathew & Others Supreme Court of India
23-01-2020 Archna Sharma Versus Sudheer Sharma High Court of Rajasthan
22-01-2020 M/s United India Insurance Company Limited, Tadepallygudem Versus V. Narahari Sharma & Another High Court of for the State of Telangana
22-01-2020 Deepak Sharma Versus Jabalpur Development Authority & Another High Court of Madhya Pradesh
16-01-2020 Rajasthan State Road Transport Corp. Managing Director & Another Versus Ramesh Kumar Sharma Supreme Court of India
15-01-2020 New Delhi Municipal Council Versus Vijay Kumar Sharma High Court of Delhi
14-01-2020 Sonia Sharma Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
14-01-2020 Vinay Sharma Versus The State of N.C.T. of Delhi Supreme Court of India
10-01-2020 Goutam Buddha Agrawal Versus Satyanarayan Sharma & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
08-01-2020 Badri Narayan Sharma V/S Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax, Jaipur Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi