w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



V.M. Joseph v/s Kadanad Grama Panchayath, Represented by Its Secretary, Kottayam & Others


Company & Directors' Information:- JOSEPH AND CO PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U01211KL1954PTC000507

Company & Directors' Information:- E R JOSEPH & CO PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U28920WB1955PTC022404

    WP(C). No. 15019 of 2019

    Decided On, 14 June 2019

    At, High Court of Kerala

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K. NARENDRAN

    For the Petitioner: Justine Jacob, P.S. Amrutha, A.P. Beelamma, K.P. Amrutha, Resmi Thomas, K.S. Arun Kumar, Advocates. For the Respondents: George kutty Mathew, SC, R3, Frinso Mathew, Advocates.



Judgment Text

1. The petitioner, who is stated to be the owner of 21 Are and 10 Sq.m of land comprised in Survey No.297/7 in Block No.31 of Kadanadu village in Kottayam district, covered by Ext.P1 tax receipt, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash Ext.P2 notice dated 9.5.2019 issued by the 2nd respondent, who is the Secretary of the 1st respondent Panchayat, invoking the provisions under sub-section (1) of section 238 of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 (for brevity, 'the Act'), whereby, the petitioner has been directed to cut and remove two vaka trees, three jack-fruit trees, one coconut tree and one cotton tree, on the ground that those trees are likely to fall over the house of the 3rd respondent and thereby endanger the said respondent. By Ext.P2 notice, the petitioner has been asked to cut and remove those trees within 7 days and to intimate the said fact in writing to the Grama Panchayat, failing which, further proceedings will be initiated against the petitioner under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 238 of the Act, on the presumption that he has no objection to that notice. A reading of Ext.P2 notice would show that based on a complaint made by the 3rd respondent, the 2nd respondent conducted a local inspection to confirm the veracity of that complaint.

2. On 31.5.2019, when this writ petition came up for admission, the learned Standing Counsel for Kadanad Grama Panchayat took notice on admission for respondents 1 and 2. Urgent notice on admission by speed post was ordered to the 3rd respondent, returnable within two weeks. Respondents 1 and 2 were directed to file statement.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel for Kadanad Grama Panchayat, representing respondents 1 and 2, as also the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent.

4. The sole issue that arises for consideration in this writ petition is as to whether any interference is warranted on Ext.P2 notice dated 9.5.2019 issued by the 2nd respondent.

5. Section 238 of the Act deals with precautions in cases of dangerous trees and pruning of hedges and trees. Sub-section (1) of Section 238 deals with the powers of a Village Panchayat. As per clause (a) of sub-section (1) of Section 238, if any tree or any branch or portion of a tree or the fruits of any tree be deemed by the Village Panchayat to be likely to fall and thereby endanger any person or any structure or any cultivation, the Village Panchayat may, by notice, require the owner of the said tree to secure, lop or cut down the said tree or remove the fruits thereof so as to prevent any danger therefrom. As per clause (b) of sub-section (1), if immediate action is necessary, the Village Panchayat shall itself, before giving such notice or before the period of such notice expires, secure, lop or cut down the said tree or remove the fruit thereof, fence off a part of any street or take such other temporary measures as it thinks fit to prevent danger, and the cost of so doing shall be recoverable from the owner of the tree in the same manner as an arrear of public revenue due on land. As per clause (c) of sub-section (1), if any tree or the branch thereof in the opinion of the Village Panchayat, causes pollution to the drinking water of a well or tank, the Village Panchayat may, by notice, require the owner of such tree to cut down and remove such tree or branch thereof.

6. Sub-section (2) of Section 238 of the Act deals with the power of the Secretary of a Village Panchayat. As per sub-section (2), the Secretary of a Village Panchayat may, without notice, (a) trim or prune any hedge bordering on a public street so that it may not exceed such height from the level of the adjoining roadways as may be provided for this purpose; or (b) cut and trim any hedge or tree overhanging the said trees and obstructing it or the view of traffic or causing damage to it; or (c) remove fallen trees on public roads and waterways which obstruct traffic.

7. The difference which is discernible from the language of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2) of Section 238 of the Act is that, sub-section (1) empowers the Village Panchayat to take appropriate measures when any branch or portion of a tree or the fruits of any tree is likely to fall and thereby endanger any person or any structure or any cultivation. Though clause (a) of sub-section (1) contemplates a notice by the Village Panchayat to the owner of the said tree, requiring him to secure, lop or cut down the said tree or remove the fruits thereof, so as to prevent any danger therefrom; clause (b) of sub-section (1) empowers the Village Panchayat to secure, lop or cut down the said tree or remove the fruit thereof, etc. before giving notice under clause (a) of sub-section (1) or before the period of such notice expire, if immediate action is necessary. On the other hand, sub-section (2) of Section 238 empowers the Secretary of the Village Panchayat, without notice, trim or prune any hedge bordering on a public street; cut and trim any hedge or tree overhanging the said street and obstructing it or the view of traffic or cause damage to it; or remove fallen trees on public roads and water ways which obstruct traffic.

8. In the instant case, the proceedings that can be initiated against the petitioner based on the complaint made by the 3rd respondent falls under sub-section (1) of section 238 of the Act, which has to be initiated by a notice issued by the Village Panchayat under clause (a) of sub-section (1), if immediate action under clause (b) of sub-section (1) is not warranted. In such circumstances, conclusion is irresistible that Ext.P2 notice issued by the 2nd respondent, who is the Secretary of the 1st respondent Panchayat, is one issued absolutely without any authority of law.

9. The learned counsel for the 3rd respondent would point out that the trees standing in the property of the petitioner is likely to fall and thereby endanger the 3rd respondent and his house. In order to substantiate the said fact, the learned counsel has also made available for the perusal of this Court certain photographs, which are stated to be that of the trees referred to in Ext.P2 notice. This Court need not go into those factual issues in this writ petition, since Ext.P2 notice issued by the 2nd respondent Secretary is one issued absolutely without any authority of law.

10. The learned standing counsel for the 1st respondent Panchayat would submit that the Panchayat shall issue a fresh notice to the petitioner, invoking the provisions under clause (a) of sub-section (1) of Section 238 of the Act, based on the complaint made by the 3rd respondent and thereafter take an appropriate decision in the matter, with notice to the petitioner and also to the 3rd respondent, and after affording them an opportunity of being heard.

11. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides, this writ petition is disposed of as follows:

(a) Ext.P2 notice dated 9.5.2019 issued by the 2nd respondent Secretary of the 1st respondent Panchayat, invoking the provisions of sub-section (1) of Section 238 of the Act, is set aside, since the power under that sub section has to be exercised by the Village Panchayat constituted under clause (a) of sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Act.

(b) The 1st respondent Village Panchayat shall forthwith issue a fresh notice to the petitioner under clause (a) of sub-section (1) of Section 238 of the Act, along with a copy of the complaint made by the 3rd respondent.<

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

br /> (c) The petitioner and the 3rd respondent shall be personally present before the Village Panchayat on 18.6.2019 at 11.30 am along with their written submissions. (d) The Village Panchayat shall conduct a personal hearing and take appropriate decision as to whether any action under sub-section (1) of Section 238 of the Act is warranted based on the complaint made by the 3rd respondent. (e) A decision in this regard shall be taken as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of three days, which shall be communicated to the petitioner and also to the 3rd respondent, forthwith. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the rival contentions on facts and it is for the Village Panchayat to take appropriate decision, strictly in accordance with law.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

11-09-2020 M/s. Unicorn Maritimes (India) Private Limited., Represented by its Director Arul Augustin Joseph Chennai Versus Valency Internation Trading Pvt Limited., Represented by its Director &amp; Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
08-09-2020 John Joseph, Advocate, Chairman Voters Alliance, Ernakulam Versus State of Kerala, Represented by Secretary, Department of Local Self Government, Thiruvananthapuram &amp; Others High Court of Kerala
08-09-2020 Dr. Joseph Freeman Motha &amp; Another Versus Sudha Vijayan &amp; Another High Court of Kerala
19-08-2020 Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., New Delhi Versus Adv. Shiji Joseph &amp; Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
14-08-2020 Jollyamma Joseph Versus State of Kerala Represented by The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala High Court of Kerala
21-07-2020 G. Bhagavat Singh Versus Manoj Joseph &amp; Others High Court of Kerala
21-07-2020 Shoby Joseph &amp; Others Versus State of Kerala, Represented by The Superintendent of Police, Crime No. 367 of 2019 of CB, Central Unit-IV, Represented by The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam &amp; Another High Court of Kerala
16-07-2020 Jai Joseph Versus State of Karnataka, Represented by its State Public Prosecutor, Bengaluru High Court of Karnataka
15-07-2020 Manu Joseph Versus State of Kerala, Represented by The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam &amp; Another High Court of Kerala
13-07-2020 Dr. K.J. Joseph &amp; Others Versus The Mattathur Grama Panchayath, Thrissur, Rep. by Its Secretary &amp; Others High Court of Kerala
30-06-2020 Bilsy Joseph, now residing at 3743, Falkner Drive, United States of America, Represented by her Power of Attorney holder (Mother), Rosamma Joseph, Kottayam Versus Registrar of Births &amp; Deaths, Changanassery Muncipality, Kottayam &amp; Others High Court of Kerala
19-06-2020 M/s. Virgo Industries (Engineers) Pvt Ltd., Rep. By its Director Reethamma Joseph &amp; Another Versus M/s. Venturetech Solutions Pvt Ltd., Rep. By its Director N. Mal Reddy High Court of Judicature at Madras
29-05-2020 Joe Joseph Versus The State of Kerala, Represented by The Principal Secretary To Government, Higher Education Department, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram &amp; Others High Court of Kerala
04-05-2020 Jobin Joseph Versus Uma Thomas &amp; Another High Court of Kerala
30-04-2020 United Nurses Association, Through Its State President Shoby Joseph, Thrissur Versus Union Of India, Represented By The Secretary, New Delhi &amp; Another High Court of Kerala
28-04-2020 Kane Joseph Manoah Versus The Queen Court of Appeal of New Zealand
20-03-2020 Jollyamma Joseph @ Jolly Versus The State of Kerala Represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam &amp; Another High Court of Kerala
17-03-2020 K.T. Joseph &amp; Another Versus Revenue Divisional Officer, Kottayam &amp; Others High Court of Kerala
11-03-2020 Shyla @ Shymol Kamalasanan &amp; Another Versus Joseph High Court of Kerala
11-03-2020 M/s. Logical Developers Private Limited, New Delhi, Represented by Its Authorized Signatory Jose Joseph, Kochi &amp; Another Versus M/s. Muthoot Mini Financiers Private Limited, Pathanamthitta, Represented by Its Chairman &amp; Managing Director Roy M. Mathew &amp; Others High Court of Kerala
10-03-2020 Shail Jiju Versus Biju Joseph &amp; Another High Court of Kerala
09-03-2020 V.Y. Thomas @ Sajimon Versus V.Y. Joseph High Court of Kerala
03-03-2020 Jet Airways (India) Ltd., represented by its Airport Manager Versus Thomas Joseph Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
28-02-2020 Sabu Joseph Versus Kerala State Election Commission, Represented by Its Secretary, State Election Commission Office, Thiruvananthapuram &amp; Another High Court of Kerala
20-02-2020 General Manager, Hmt Machine Tools Ltd., Through Its Deputy General Manager (Hr) Shri Joseph Pradeep Keshri Minz, Ajmer (Raj) &amp; Others Versus Controlling Authority, Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 &amp; Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Ajmer (Raj) &amp; Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
20-02-2020 Lalu Joseph Versus The State of Kerala, Represented by The Public Proseucutor, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam for The Circle Inspector of Police, Nilambur High Court of Kerala
19-02-2020 Marthoma Syrian Church, Represented by Most Rev. Dr. Joseph, Marthoma Metropolitan, Thiruvalla &amp; Others Versus Jessie Thampi (Died) &amp; Others High Court of Kerala
19-02-2020 Joy Joseph Versus Desai Homes represented by V.R. Desai &amp; Another Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
13-02-2020 E. Arputhadhas Versus E. Joseph (Died) &amp; Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
10-02-2020 Tonymon Joseph Versus General Manager, Southern Railway, Chennai &amp; Others High Court of Kerala
31-01-2020 Kolli Venkata Mohana Rao &amp; Another Versus Joseph Christian Krishnaraj (died) &amp; Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
29-01-2020 J. Xavier Versus Joseph High Court of Judicature at Madras
20-01-2020 K. John &amp; Others Versus John Joseph &amp; Others High Court of Kerala
14-01-2020 Joseph Yemmiganoor @ Kadakoti Versus State, Through Police Inspector &amp; Another In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
19-12-2019 Joseph Tajet Versus State of Kerala Represented by Chief Secretary To Government, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram High Court of Kerala
12-12-2019 Nobby M. George, Changanassery Tlauk, Rep. by Power of Attorney holder his mother Alice George, Changanassery Versus Jossy Joseph, Kuttanad Taluk, Now Staying With Her Sister Raji Joseph, Erskine Court, Nanuet 10954, New York, USA High Court of Kerala
10-12-2019 Joseph Charles &amp; Others Versus State, Rep. by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station-South, Madurai &amp; Another Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
06-12-2019 P.T. Joseph, Proprietor, Cheryl Enterprises, Elamakkara, Ernakulam Versus Kabeer Husain Minanna &amp; Others High Court of Kerala
28-11-2019 Joseph Mathai @ Jose Versus State of Kerala, Thiruvampady Police Station, Crime No.199/07 High Court of Kerala
28-11-2019 M. Jeyamary Versus M. Joseph Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
18-11-2019 Deepa Rachal George Versus Sherin Annie Joseph &amp; Others High Court of Kerala
14-11-2019 Rev. Fr. L. Joseph Paulraj Versus St. Mary's Cathedral Trust Rep. by its Secretary-cum-Treasurer Rev. Fr. Devaraj &amp; Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
11-11-2019 Joseph Antony Gerard Versus J.L. Malarvizhi High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-10-2019 IC 29547 L Bobby Joseph Versus Union of India &amp; Others Supreme Court of India
26-09-2019 Priya Versus Biju Joseph High Court of Kerala
19-09-2019 M.M. Joseph Versus Yoonus &amp; Others High Court of Kerala
19-09-2019 M/s. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., Egmore, Chennai, Represented by Chief Manager, Stephen Joseph, Kochi Versus Joseph Mohanan &amp; Another High Court of Kerala
17-09-2019 Alwin Joseph Versus The Superintendent of Police, Erode &amp; Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-09-2019 Sushil Joseph Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Labour-II (Authority under the Payment of Wages Act) Chennai &amp; Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-08-2019 Paul Joseph Shirole &amp; Another Versus The State of Maharashtra High Court of Judicature at Bombay
26-08-2019 B.S. Shabana Versus Kevin Joseph Selvadoray High Court of Karnataka
22-08-2019 State of Kerala, Represented by deputy Commissioner of State Tax (Law), State Goods &amp; Service Tax Department, Ernakulam Versus Raphel T. Joseph High Court of Kerala
21-08-2019 M/s Popular Vehicles &amp; Services Ltd., V.H. Kammath Towers, Kadathy, Muvattupuzha Versus James K. Joseph &amp; Another Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
09-08-2019 Charly Joseph Versus State of Kerala, Represented by The Secretary, Industries Department, Thiruvananthapuram &amp; Others High Court of Kerala
09-08-2019 Joseph Thomas @ Jose &amp; Others Versus State of Kerala, Represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam High Court of Kerala
30-07-2019 Sijo Joseph Versus The Transport Commissioner, Vazhuthacaud, Thiruvananthapuram &amp; Others High Court of Kerala
29-07-2019 Geemol Joseph, Represented by her Power of Attorney holder Losan Joseph Versus Kousthabhan &amp; Another High Court of Kerala
19-06-2019 Joseph Thomas @ Thampi Kannanthanam &amp; Others Versus Molly George @ Molamma High Court of Kerala
14-06-2019 C. Joseph Versus The District Collector, Coimbatore &amp; Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
11-06-2019 Clarence Joseph Bhengra Versus State of Jharkhand High Court of Jharkhand
07-06-2019 L'Oratoire Saint-Joseph du Mont-Royal Versus J.J Supreme Court of Canada
30-05-2019 D.B. Jatti &amp; Another Versus Kambam Sudhir Joseph Reddy &amp; Another High Court of Karnataka
30-05-2019 Thresiamma Manshoven Versus Manshoven Jacques Joseph High Court of Kerala
29-05-2019 Asha, Rep. by the Power of Attorney Holder Jonh D'cruz Versus P.K. Joseph &amp; Another High Court of Kerala
02-05-2019 Lydia Agnes Rodrigues (Since deceased) through her legal heirs &amp; Others Versus Joseph Anthony D'Cunha &amp; Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
26-04-2019 Viji Joseph &amp; Another Versus P. Chander &amp; Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
25-04-2019 Management of St. Joseph of Cluny Montessori School, Pondicherry Versus The Director of School Education, Government of Pondicherry &amp; Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
09-04-2019 Joseph Santhosh Kottarathil Alexander &amp; Others Versus The Superintendent of Customs (Aiu), Cochin International Airport, Nedumbassery, Kochi &amp; Others High Court of Kerala
29-03-2019 Joseph Peter &amp; Others Versus Elizabath Manuel &amp; Others High Court of Kerala
25-03-2019 Commissioner, West Arni Panchayat Union, Thiruvannamalai Versus St. Joseph Social Welfare Centre, Rep by Brother &amp; Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
14-03-2019 Joseph Saldhana Versus State of Karnataka, Represented by the Deputy Commissioner &amp; Others High Court of Karnataka
08-03-2019 K.A. Joseph Versus The District Collector, Kottayam &amp; Others High Court of Kerala
07-03-2019 Sebastian Joseph Versus The Governor, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai Others High Court of Kerala
06-03-2019 James Joseph Murren as Trustee of the James J Murren Spendthrift Trust &amp; Daniel Lee Versus Glenn Schaeffer Court of Appeal of New Zealand
27-02-2019 Tushar Versus Internal Complaints Committee Christ University, Rep. by its Presiding Officer Dr. Mayamma Joseph &amp; Others High Court of Karnataka
22-02-2019 Shali Joseph &amp; Another Versus S.K. Sasikumar High Court of Kerala
19-02-2019 P.B. Dineshan Pillai Versus Joseph @ Jose High Court of Kerala
18-02-2019 Joseph Versus State of Karnataka &amp; Others High Court of Karnataka
13-02-2019 HDB Financial Services Limited, Ernakulam, Represented by Its Legal Officer (Kerala) &amp; Authorized Officer, A.C. Pratheesh Versus M/s. Kings Baker Private Limited, Kottayam, Represented by Its Proprietor, Tom.P. Joseph &amp; Others High Court of Kerala
08-02-2019 Malabar Granites, Palakkad, Represented by Its Managing Partner, M.K. Joseph Versus The Secretary , Koppam Grama Panchayat, Palakkad &amp; Others High Court of Kerala
31-01-2019 Sami Labs Limited Versus M.V. Joseph High Court of Karnataka
29-01-2019 P. Santhosh Joseph &amp; Another Versus The Principal Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration &amp; Water Supply Dept., Chennai &amp; Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
24-01-2019 Malabar Granites, Represented by Its Managing Partner, M.K. Joseph Versus The Secretary, Koppam Grama Panchayat & Others High Court of Kerala
24-01-2019 Thomas Joseph Versus Caculo Automotive Pvt. Ltd. &amp; Another Goa State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Panaji
24-01-2019 The Commercial Tax Officer, Changanassery &amp; Others Versus M/s. Hotel Breezeland Ltd., Changanassery, Represented by Its Managing Director Joseph Cherian &amp; Another High Court of Kerala
23-01-2019 M/s. Sanjose Parish Hospital, Represented by its Director, Rev. Fr. Joseph (Noby) Ambookan & Others Versus The Commercial Tax Officer, Chavakkad, Thrissur & Others High Court of Kerala
22-01-2019 Joseph A. Kennedy Versus Bremerton School District (2019) Supreme Court of United States
22-01-2019 Joseph A. Kennedy Versus Bremerton School District(2019) Supreme Court of United States
18-01-2019 M/s. Sanjose Parish Hospital, Thrissur, Represented by Its Director, Rev. Fr. Joseph (Noby) Ambookan &amp; Others Versus The Commercial Tax Officer, Thrissur &amp; Others High Court of Kerala
14-01-2019 Joseph Velivil Versus Nucleus Premium Properties Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Managing Director Nishad N.P, Ventura Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
11-01-2019 Suo Motu, K. Ani Joseph &amp; Others Versus State of Kerala &amp; Another High Court of Kerala
11-01-2019 Joseph George &amp; Another Versus State of Kerala, Represented by The Chief Secretary, State Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram &amp; Others High Court of Kerala
03-01-2019 The Assistant General Manager &amp; Authorized Officer, Union Bank of India Consortium, Ernakulam Main Branch Versus The Dewa Investors Association, Ernakulam, Represented By Its President Prince Joseph &amp; Others High Court of Kerala
19-12-2018 The Refugee Appeal Board of South Africa & Others Versus Paul Joseph Mutombo Mukungubila Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa
14-12-2018 Suriyur Vivasayigal Pathukappu Sangam, Rep. by its President, T. Ramaraj, Trichy Versus LA Bottlers Private Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director, Joseph Francis, Thiruchirappalli &amp; Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
13-12-2018 Stella Joseph & Another Versus The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Bengaluru & Others High Court of Kerala
13-12-2018 K.A. Joseph, Kannur District &amp; Another Versus South Indian Bank Ltd, Kannur &amp; Another Debts Recovery Tribunal Ernakulam
29-11-2018 Alphonsa Joseph and Others V/S Anand Joseph High Court of Kerala Ernakulam Bench
30-10-2018 Tomy Joseph Versus Smitha Tomy High Court of Kerala
29-10-2018 G. Bhagavat Singh Versus Manoj Joseph & Others High Court of Kerala