w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



United India Insurance Company Ltd., Rajasthan v/s M/s. Radhika Oil Industries, Rajasthan


Company & Directors' Information:- OIL INDIA LIMITED [Active] CIN = L11101AS1959GOI001148

Company & Directors' Information:- UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED [Active] CIN = U93090TN1938GOI000108

Company & Directors' Information:- T T G INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27209TN1987PLC014169

Company & Directors' Information:- V I P INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = L25200MH1968PLC013914

Company & Directors' Information:- A L M INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U14100DL1996PLC129067

Company & Directors' Information:- S R K INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = L17121MH1991PLC257750

Company & Directors' Information:- S R INDUSTRIES LTD [Active] CIN = L29246PB1989PLC009531

Company & Directors' Information:- F E INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U36100PB2003PTC026482

Company & Directors' Information:- N K INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = L91110GJ1987PLC009905

Company & Directors' Information:- T S I INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U18101HR1997PTC034478

Company & Directors' Information:- B L A INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED. [Active] CIN = U10200MH1964PTC162314

Company & Directors' Information:- RAJASTHAN INDUSTRIES LIMITED. [Active] CIN = U14219RJ1949PLC000700

Company & Directors' Information:- H G I INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = L40200WB1944PLC011754

Company & Directors' Information:- R P INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27100GJ2011PTC075812

Company & Directors' Information:- D D INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1974PLC007169

Company & Directors' Information:- A G INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27300HR1991PTC031378

Company & Directors' Information:- H. J. INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17120GJ2010PTC060769

Company & Directors' Information:- G R S INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U00000PB2005PLC029159

Company & Directors' Information:- T S L INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = L65999WB1994PLC065255

Company & Directors' Information:- M F B INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U31401TN1989PLC018274

Company & Directors' Information:- S R P OIL PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U23209DL1996PTC303594

Company & Directors' Information:- A C M E INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Dormant under section 455] CIN = U19119DL1992PLC048914

Company & Directors' Information:- V S P INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17111TZ2005PTC011820

Company & Directors' Information:- M N INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24100TG2012PTC079737

Company & Directors' Information:- G I INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15312PB2010PTC033806

Company & Directors' Information:- E T C INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U31200MP1995PLC009281

Company & Directors' Information:- S K INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U74899DL1991PTC045572

Company & Directors' Information:- S R V E INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U03210TZ2006PLC012577

Company & Directors' Information:- B. R. OIL INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15141MP2009PTC022534

Company & Directors' Information:- Z H INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45200DL2014PTC265453

Company & Directors' Information:- P AND P INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U21010MH1992PLC068885

Company & Directors' Information:- N G INDUSTRIES LTD [Active] CIN = L74140WB1994PLC065937

Company & Directors' Information:- S L INDUSTRIES P. LTD. [Active] CIN = U15331WB1989PTC047543

Company & Directors' Information:- T R A T INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U25199KL1996PLC010148

Company & Directors' Information:- B R INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1995PLC067120

Company & Directors' Information:- N M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74120DL2008PTC175664

Company & Directors' Information:- N R C INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909PB1985PLC006558

Company & Directors' Information:- S N L INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U17115RJ1994PTC008053

Company & Directors' Information:- J V INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1994PTC057081

Company & Directors' Information:- A R INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27101HR1995PTC032569

Company & Directors' Information:- D V S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1992PTC049221

Company & Directors' Information:- C D INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27100MH1996PLC101277

Company & Directors' Information:- G V INDUSTRIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74900TG2014PTC096387

Company & Directors' Information:- G S M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U02001DL2002PTC117443

Company & Directors' Information:- B G INDUSTRIES LTD [Active] CIN = U26921ML1980PLC001830

Company & Directors' Information:- P K INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51900DL2012PTC241654

Company & Directors' Information:- M D INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U91110GJ1994PTC022025

Company & Directors' Information:- L C INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15122UP2013PTC055697

Company & Directors' Information:- G. A. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15435MH2005PTC151817

Company & Directors' Information:- P A S INDUSTRIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active in Progress] CIN = U17121TZ2005PTC012171

Company & Directors' Information:- V AND S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1990PTC039251

Company & Directors' Information:- M K J INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U19111UP1989PTC010468

Company & Directors' Information:- S S F INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U25190BR1988PLC003160

Company & Directors' Information:- P B INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29120MP1994PTC008840

Company & Directors' Information:- R & M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24297TN1972PTC006185

Company & Directors' Information:- RADHIKA (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1975PTC007733

Company & Directors' Information:- A M INDUSTRIES LTD [Active] CIN = U21012WB1977PLC030854

Company & Directors' Information:- A AND S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17117DL1995PTC064137

Company & Directors' Information:- M C INDUSTRIES LTD [Active] CIN = U27106WB1993PLC058995

Company & Directors' Information:- D R INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24100WB2011PTC160058

Company & Directors' Information:- R. L. F. INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909DL1983PLC015262

Company & Directors' Information:- U K INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24241WB1988PTC044355

Company & Directors' Information:- M G I INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27310GJ2006PTC048707

Company & Directors' Information:- A D INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101WB2008PTC131561

Company & Directors' Information:- V J INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29253KA2009PTC050226

Company & Directors' Information:- V T INDUSTRIES PVT LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29150WB1985PLC039217

Company & Directors' Information:- V T INDUSTRIES PVT LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29150WB1985PTC039217

Company & Directors' Information:- G R INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U34300PB1996PTC018671

Company & Directors' Information:- M. K. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15549WB2008PTC130116

Company & Directors' Information:- R S V INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U52399MH2008PTC180489

Company & Directors' Information:- K. A. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U14220JH2008PTC013409

Company & Directors' Information:- D K INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45202CH1994PLC014627

Company & Directors' Information:- D G INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U36942WB1946PTC013526

Company & Directors' Information:- R I L INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U70101DL1993PTC052678

Company & Directors' Information:- I S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29100GJ2009PTC057308

Company & Directors' Information:- B M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17000MH1997PTC109621

Company & Directors' Information:- R V S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17111TZ1995PTC006398

Company & Directors' Information:- B N INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U67120AS1994PTC004273

Company & Directors' Information:- A J INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17120MH2004PTC145040

Company & Directors' Information:- S. A. A INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U01549TZ1997PTC007927

Company & Directors' Information:- K K S K INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U19201TZ1997PTC007687

Company & Directors' Information:- C R I INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Amalgamated] CIN = U29120TZ2002PTC010129

Company & Directors' Information:- A C T INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1984PTC018724

Company & Directors' Information:- G B INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29220PN2011PTC139883

Company & Directors' Information:- S D B INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27107MP1996PLC010394

Company & Directors' Information:- M M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U31300CT2008PTC020916

Company & Directors' Information:- A C INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U29299WB2006PTC109474

Company & Directors' Information:- K M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Converted to LLP and Dissolved] CIN = U74899DL1991PTC043295

Company & Directors' Information:- C J INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U25209MH1998PTC116707

Company & Directors' Information:- N P INDUSTRIES LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U15549PB1989PLC009426

Company & Directors' Information:- J B UNITED PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U93000MH2014PTC258844

Company & Directors' Information:- J B UNITED PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999MH2014PTC258844

Company & Directors' Information:- J. L. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29141MP2008PTC020731

Company & Directors' Information:- I K INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24100MH2010PTC199474

Company & Directors' Information:- H. D. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27310MH2011PTC216080

Company & Directors' Information:- R. D. G. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U26960DL2008PTC182480

Company & Directors' Information:- R B INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U28999DL2008PTC177248

Company & Directors' Information:- H & H INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U34100DL2010PTC204604

Company & Directors' Information:- M J INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15203KA2011PTC060675

Company & Directors' Information:- B R V INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U32301UP1995PTC018704

Company & Directors' Information:- A. G. INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U25201UP1994PLC017291

Company & Directors' Information:- B R INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U15204AS1993PLC003930

Company & Directors' Information:- I P M INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U25200DL1995PLC068554

Company & Directors' Information:- RADHIKA INDUSTRIES LIMITED. [Strike Off] CIN = U21012DL1995PLC072506

Company & Directors' Information:- M R INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74900UP2008PTC036443

Company & Directors' Information:- R D I INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74900DL1995PTC065508

Company & Directors' Information:- J G INDUSTRIES LTD [Active] CIN = L15141WB1983PLC035931

Company & Directors' Information:- V G INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15139JK2015PTC004570

Company & Directors' Information:- S B OIL INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U51225WB1981PTC033684

Company & Directors' Information:- S N INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29211UP1951PTC002319

Company & Directors' Information:- K G INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U29130WB1951PTC019868

Company & Directors' Information:- N S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U74120UP2012PTC053986

Company & Directors' Information:- W W I INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29300MH1997PTC112589

Company & Directors' Information:- D U INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29230GJ2016PTC091588

Company & Directors' Information:- S R P INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Amalgamated] CIN = U00061BR1984PLC002023

Company & Directors' Information:- C P INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U29303MP1949PTC000846

Company & Directors' Information:- J B INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74999MH2013PTC245506

Company & Directors' Information:- S J V INDUSTRIES LTD [Amalgamated] CIN = U15421WB1982PLC035521

Company & Directors' Information:- V V INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U99999DL1980PTC010427

Company & Directors' Information:- K K INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65100DL1982PTC013046

Company & Directors' Information:- A T C INDUSTRIES LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U27109AS1984PLC002201

Company & Directors' Information:- K R OIL INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15140UP1988PTC009717

Company & Directors' Information:- N V INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U51909WB1953PTC020952

Company & Directors' Information:- RAJASTHAN OIL INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U15141RJ1978PLC001835

Company & Directors' Information:- A TO Z INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U31908AS1987PTC002804

Company & Directors' Information:- L K INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17291MH2012PTC233546

Company & Directors' Information:- OIL CORPORATION OF INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15133UP1952PTC002471

Company & Directors' Information:- G S C INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LTD [Active] CIN = U92114DL1956PTC002616

Company & Directors' Information:- O.I.L PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15400DL2013PTC255692

Company & Directors' Information:- G G INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27320UP1969PTC003282

Company & Directors' Information:- K S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U31909MH1960PTC011707

Company & Directors' Information:- P R INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U21014DL1971PTC005738

Company & Directors' Information:- R K I INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29190DL2012PTC233413

Company & Directors' Information:- R K INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U25202AS1988PTC003132

Company & Directors' Information:- UNITED OIL COMPANY (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U15740UP1932PTC000456

Company & Directors' Information:- S G R INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U25199WB1948PTC016397

Company & Directors' Information:- K R INDUSTRIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U25190KA2012PTC062367

Company & Directors' Information:- P P OIL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15141MH1999PTC117925

Company & Directors' Information:- Y K INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U19115UP2012PTC051151

Company & Directors' Information:- E S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74999TN2012PTC086119

Company & Directors' Information:- I B INDUSTRIES LTD. [Strike Off] CIN = U28992WB1990PLC050469

Company & Directors' Information:- V I INDUSTRIES LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U36934WB1951PLC019890

Company & Directors' Information:- THE RAJASTHAN INSURANCE CO LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U67200WB1937PLC006775

Company & Directors' Information:- J M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U05002UP1952PTC002456

Company & Directors' Information:- L F INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17291UP2015PTC068602

Company & Directors' Information:- A K S INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27201WB1946PTC013433

Company & Directors' Information:- V M V INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U26990GJ2013PTC076945

Company & Directors' Information:- S K INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U29248PN1948PLC001948

Company & Directors' Information:- S P INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U20232AS1980PTC001853

Company & Directors' Information:- V N R INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U21090AP2012PTC081525

Company & Directors' Information:- A K INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U51109WB1944PTC011764

Company & Directors' Information:- K INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U99999KA1946PTC000938

Company & Directors' Information:- G I P INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U52605MH2015PTC263962

Company & Directors' Information:- C. L. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27109RJ2014PTC045306

Company & Directors' Information:- R. A. M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17120MH2014PTC254820

Company & Directors' Information:- S. B. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74900PN2012PTC144181

Company & Directors' Information:- A & P INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U36935TG2014PTC095781

Company & Directors' Information:- C & N INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U40200TG2014PTC095187

Company & Directors' Information:- B S B INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45200TG2013PTC088059

Company & Directors' Information:- R A R INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74900TG2016PTC103684

Company & Directors' Information:- K S A B INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909WB2012PTC181903

Company & Directors' Information:- S V S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U36100JK2013PTC003808

Company & Directors' Information:- R D M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U31100DL2013PTC252294

Company & Directors' Information:- INDUSTRIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U00349KA1947PTC000501

Company & Directors' Information:- A V K INDUSTRIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U52100KA2012PTC066761

Company & Directors' Information:- I.N. INSURANCE COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U67200DL1994PTC062554

Company & Directors' Information:- S V INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U27104WB1960PTC024715

Company & Directors' Information:- INSURANCE OF INDIA LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U67200WB1936PLC008634

Company & Directors' Information:- J INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U18101OR1960PTC000388

Company & Directors' Information:- B F OIL PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U15141DL1993PTC052160

Company & Directors' Information:- UNITED CORPORATION LIMITED [Liquidated] CIN = U99999TN1942PLC003159

Company & Directors' Information:- T & M INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Liquidated] CIN = U99999TN1956PLC002904

Company & Directors' Information:- OIL INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Dissolved] CIN = U99999KA1947PLC000951

Company & Directors' Information:- INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U51109BR1946PTC000228

Company & Directors' Information:- K INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Not available for efiling] CIN = U99999MH1946PTC005438

    Revision Petition No. 546 of 2015

    Decided On, 10 September 2020

    At, National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. ANUP K THAKUR
    By, PRESIDING MEMBER

    For the Petitioner: A.K. De, Ananya, Advocates. For the Respondent: Deepika, Anuj Chauhan, Advocates.



Judgment Text


1. Under challenge in this Revision Petition No.546 of 2015 is the impugned order of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bench No.2, Jaipur (State Commission, hereafter) dated 01.12.2014. Vide this order, the State Commission had dismissed Appeal No.1150 of 2012 and upheld the decision of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bharatpur, Rajasthan (District Forum, hereafter) dated 31.07.2012 in CC 252/2003. The District Forum’s order, by a majority of two out of three members, had allowed the complaint and directed the petitioner/OP insurance company to pay Rs. 3,92,150/- with 9% interest from 18.6.2003, the date of filing of the consumer complaint, with a further Rs.20,000/- for cost of litigation, within one month of the date of the award.

2. Very briefly, per the complaint on 09.12.2000, the respondent/complainant (complainant hereafter) had dispatched 756 tins of mustard oil from Bharatpur, Rajasthan to M/s. Tirupati Enterprises, Gauhati, Assam, through carrier G.R. Roadlines, Bharatpur. Under the marine cargo policy with the petitioner/OP-United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (OP, hereafter) under declaration No. 31 dated 09.12.2000, the consignment was insured for Rs.3,92,150/- against a premium of Rs.21,001/-. Per the plaint, some offenders forcefully unloaded the truck at Barauni, Bihar. The driver of the truck intimated the complainant who lodged a complaint at P.S. Udyognagar, Bharatpur vide FIR No.78/01 dated 2.6.2001. OP was also intimated on 3.6.2001 and 10.8.2001. OP appointed Mr. M.L. Bhatia as surveyor. Some information sought by the surveyor was provided on 27.09.2002. As no information on the claim was received, registered notice dated 22.05.2003 was served on the OP. Since the claim was still not paid, the complainant filed consumer complaint, CC 252/2003, claiming Rs.3,92,150/- (value of insured goods) plus amounts for expenses, compensation etc. with 24% interest from 3.6.2001, the date of first intimation to the OP.

3. The complaint was contested by the OP through a written reply. Preliminary objections were taken: (i) the complainant, being a business firm, was not a consumer; (ii) the plaint mentions that the matter titled State vs. Ramanuj is pending before Judicial Magistrate No.1 Bharatpur; as such, District Forum had no jurisdiction to hear the complaint. Para-wise reply was also given by the OP. Importantly, exception was taken to intimation to the OP by the complainant on 3.6.2001 after a delay of six months; it was maintained that the surveyor was appointed not only for assessment of loss but for also ascertaining the actual facts; case was not of non-delivery; rather, the case was limited to payments dispute amongst the complainant, broker and consignee. It was further stated in the reply that it was clear that the complainant was selling a product through a broker as has been mentioned in the FIR lodged with P.S., Bharatpur: The deal was being done through Mr. Randhir Kumar, representative of the broker, Mr. Ashrafilal of Patna City, through Mr. Ramanuj of Barauni, for the consignee’s address at Guwahati and payment was being received through Mr. Ramanuj Singh or Mr. Randhir Kumar. The complainant had advised the driver of the truck to contact Mr. Randhir Kumar and it was under his direction that the driver delivered the consignment to Mr. Ramanuj Singh at Barauni, collecting the balance freight from him. OP submitted in it’s reply that if criminals would have got the consignment unloaded, immediate intimation would have been made to the nearby P.S.; instead, it was after six months of the incident that FIR was lodged at P.S. Bharatpur. It was also stated that though G.R. No.4027 dated 09.12.2000 was issued in favour of M/s. Tirupati Enterprises, Guwahati, it was strange that the consignee did not give any intimation to the complainant firm of non-receipt of the consignment, nor did the carrier engaged issue any certificate of non-delivery or short delivery of the insured goods, nor indeed did the complainant serve any notice to the carrier as per the Carrier’s Act. It was further stated in the reply that the complaint did not mention any dates viz. date Mr. Ramanuj Singh took delivery of the consignment at Barauni, date of intimation by the truck driver to the complainant. FIR, with Bharatpur P.S., was lodged after six months. OP had therefore appointed an IRDA empanelled independent surveyor, Mr. M.L. Bhatia, who issued registered A.D. letters to complainant and M/s. Tirupati Enterprises Guwahati; no reply was received from M/s. Tirupati Enterprises, Guwahati. The fact was that there was a dispute between the complainant, Mr. Ramanuj Singh and Mr. Randhir Kumar; this dispute was regarding payment, not delivery of goods. As such, the insurance company was not liable at all. Since goods were delivered to Ramanuj Singh, there was no occasion to report to the local P.S.. The OP, on the basis of investigation report of Shri M.L. Bhatia, had accordingly found the claim to be not payable.

4. The District Forum, as already noted, was approached through consumer complaint No.252 of 2003 dated 18.6.2003. This was disposed off under two separate orders of the District Forum dated 29.3.2007, one by the President of the Forum and the other by it’s two Members; while the President dismissed the complaint, the two Members held that as the goods had not reached the final destination, the complainant was liable to get compensation. Against this order dated 29.3.2007, the appeal filed was disposed off by the State Commission by remanding the matter back to District Forum. Thereafter, the District Forum by its order dated 31.07.2012, again by a 2:1( 2 members: President), allowed the complaint. This order of 31.7.2012 on appeal was upheld by the State Commission vide the impugned order dated 01.12.2014. Hence, this revision petition.

5. Heard arguments on 19.11.2019.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner, admitting the basic facts viz. Marine Cargo policy, declaration of the consignment, consignment unloaded allegedly by miscreants on 09.12.2000, FIR dated 2.6.2001 filed at Bharatpur P.S. and the insurance claim lodged finally on 6.6.2001, submitted that, in fact, the claim had not as yet been formally repudiated. He highlighted the fact that on both the occasions viz. first filing of the complaint and after remand by the State Commission, the District Forum had decided the plaint by a majority decision, with the President of the forum dismissing the complaint through his own independent order and the two members allowing the same. Drawing attention to the impugned order of the State Commission, learned counsel argued that it had erred in not appreciating that the complainant’s stand to the effect that since details of policy had not been provided to it, it did not appreciate the need for immediate intimation to the P.S. and the OP, was false. Further, he submitted that exclusions clause in the policy would clearly show that the incident described in the complaint was not covered under the policy. The State Commission however took the view that this would be so only if the terms and conditions of the policy had been before the District Forum and the State Commission and that in absence of this, this point could not be maintained by the OP. Learned counsel referred to the order of the District Forum dated 31.07.2012, drawing attention to the order of the President, arguing that he had correctly dismissed the complaint on the grounds that (i) the fact that the consignment did not reach Guwahati did not mean that it was looted or stolen during transit; (ii) the deal was done by the complainant with Sh. Ramanuj Singh and payment was to be through Sh. Ramanuj and so he got the consignment unloaded at Barauni before it reached Guwahati; (iii) FIR against Ramanuj Singh was lodged six months after the date of incident suggesting that the dispute of getting consignment unloaded in Barauni was not covered under the policy; (iv) delay of six months in intimating the OP/Insurance company was a clear cut violation of conditions of the policy; (v) no deficiency in service was therefore established. He then drew attention to the impugned order of the State Commission where the ground taken for allowing the complaint was that the OP had not made available the terms and conditions of the policy to the complainant and had it done so, the complainant would surely have complied. A few citations were also invoked in this regard. Learned counsel maintained that though the policy conditions were filed with the Revision Petition, what was filed before the District Forum was the declaratory order dated 28.3.2001: however, this too clearly mentioned in the column, survey and claim settlement, that “in the event of loss or damage which may involve a claim under this insurance, immediate notice thereof and application for survey should be given to any office of U.I.I. Co. Ltd.”. Thus, the counsel argued that even if it is the case that the complainant was not intimated the detailed terms and conditions of the policy, the declaratory note by itself was sufficient to establish beyond any doubt that six months in intimating the OP meant a violation of the policy. As such, the complaint was not permissible.

7. Learned counsel for the complainant made the point that the details attached with the policy of insurance have been filed before the National Commission for the first time. He emphasized that it would be seen that in para 1.12.82, it had been clearly recorded in this policy that in consideration of an additional premium, it is hereby agreed that this insurance covers loss or damage to the subject matter insured caused by theft or pilferage, or by non-delivery of an entire package, subject always to the exclusions contained in this insurance. As such, he argued that the incident was covered under insurance policy for which an extra premium had also been paid. Drawing attention to the declaratory notice dated 28.3.2001, he submitted that the event of non-delivery of the consignment was covered in the policy Secondly, he pointed out that the revisionary jurisdiction as per well laid down law was limited. In the instant matter, the State Commission had upheld the decision of the District Forum and as such, there was no real ground to interfere with the same. In this regard, he invoked a citation, (2016) 8 SCC 286, Lourdes Society Snehanjali Girls Hostel and Anr. vs. H&R Johnson (India) Limited and Others in Civil Appeal No.7223 of 2016 decided on August, 2, 2016 relevant extract of which reads as:

“The National Commission has to exercise the jurisdiction vested in it only if the State Commission or the District Forum has either failed to exercise their jurisdiction or exercised when the same was not vested in them or exceeded their jurisdiction by acting illegally or with material irregularity. In the instant case, the National Commission has certainly exceeded its jurisdiction by setting aside the concurrent finding of fact recorded in the order passed by the State Commission which is based upon valid and cogent reasons.”

He invoked another citation, (2011) 11 SCC 269, Rubi (Chandra) Dutta vs. United India Ins. Co. Ltd., which reads as under:

“Also, it is to be noted that the revisional powers of the National Commission are derived from Section 21 (b) of the Act, under which the said power can be exercised only if there is some prima facie jurisdictional error appearing in the impugned order, and only then, may the same be set aside. In our considered opinion there was no jurisdictional error or miscarriage of justice, which could have warranted the National Commission to have taken a different view than what was taken by the two Forums. The decision of the National Commission rests not on the basis of some legal principle that was ignored by the Courts below, but on a different (and in our opinion, an erroneous) interpretation of the same set of facts. This is not the manner in which revisional powers should be invoked. In this view of the matter, we are of the considered opinion that the jurisdiction conferred on the National Commission under Section 21 (b) of the Act has been transgressed. It was not a case where such a view could have been taken by setting aside the concurrent findings of two fora.”

Lastly, counsel drew attention to the impugned order of the State Commission to make the point that till the date this matter was decided by the State Commission, repudiation had not been issued by the OP. He argued that this certainly amounted to a deficiency in service.

8. Having heard the learned counsels and having carefully perused the record, I am of the considered view that this revision petition, despite it challenging the concurrent orders of the lower fora, cannot succeed.

9. Indeed, the citation invoked by the learned counsel for the complainant during arguments is the established law. The revisionary powers are limited against concurrent findings of the lower fora. However, in the instant case, the orders of the lower fora contain errors apparent of fact and law, as discussed below.

One, the complaint petition, para 3 thereof, states that some offenders got the said consignment forcefully unloaded at Barauni, Bihar. It then goes to the state that after the driver gave intimation to the complainant, the complainant lodged a complaint in P.S. vide FIR No.78/01 at P.S. Udyognagar, Bharatpur. In this case, the court, at first sight, found the matter to be under section 420 and 406 IPC. Further, in the FIR lodged at Bharatpur, it has been stated that the consignment was dispatched to Guwahati under arrangement involving a sale agreement with Mr. Ashrafilal Broker, Sh. Ramanuj Singh who had assured payment and Sh. Randhir Kumar, the person who would give instructions to the driver. It has been stated further that Sh. Ramanuj Singh got a challan for Guwahati prepared and when the driver asked him, he got the consignment unloaded at Barauni, without making any payment and also without making any receipt of delivery of goods while taking the original papers sent with the consignment. Notably, the difference between the statement made in the complaint and in the FIR six months later are quite at variance. It is also to be noted that para 3 of the complaint does not mention of any dates at all; this itself makes the para extremely vague and unreliable. Whereas vagueness can be understood in a first immediate report, it cannot be understood in the consumer complaint which was filed after lapse of considerable time. One inference possible is that the complainant was not very clear about making the consumer complaint in the first place and the same was an afterthought after he had failed to receive payment. Even if this be only a presumption, it would certainly seem to be the case that under the arrangement described in the complaint and in the FIR, the entire affair was a matter of internal dispute; it was certainly not a case of the consignment looted, as it were, mid- way at Barauni. Nothing on record by way of evidence has been offered to prove that it was a forced unloading of goods.

Two, there is the factum of very significant delay in intimation of the incident to both the police as well as the OP: not only have they not been explained, the lack of any attempt to do so is conspicuous. Even so, the OP appointed a surveyor, Mr M. L. Bhatia. His observation in report dated 22.1.2001, reproduced in short synopsis dated 4.9.2017 of the counsel for the OP, reads as below:

“From the records, it is obviously clear that goods has been delivered to M/s. Mehi Ananpurna Bhandar, Bironi as per the advices of M/s Asharfi Lal Dalal, Radika Oil Industries and G.R. Road lines also confirm that goods has been rightly delivered as advised to the driver. When the receiver of goods M/s Annapurna Bhandar did not make payment to the consigner. The consignor thought for recovery of amount from insurance company through lodging claim under the impression that credit guarantee is also covered in Marine Policy.

The Insured kept mum for a period of about more than 5 months after delivery of goods. On 02.06.2001, the insured lodged FIR against Ramanuj Singh Proprietor Mehi Annapurna Bhandar. On 06.06.2001 for the first time insured lodged claim with the insurance company and prior to this he never sent any information with regard to delivery of goods.

The above claim relates to credit guarantee insurance and not Marine Cargo Insurance, hence insurer has no liability under the terms and conditions of the policy.”

Three, the plea that the complainant was not aware of the importance of intimating on time cannot be accepted. Any insurance policy requires intimation on time and terms and conditions of the policy always make it incumbent on the insured to inform immediately. It is hard to comprehend that a firm such as the complainant, in the business of selling mustard oil through a broker in Patna City to a party in Guwahati, Assam, could be unaware of this provision of insurance policy. It is impossible to comprehend that the complainant, after it’s consignment had been forcefully unloaded by miscreants, would take almost six months to lodge a police case and a claim with the insurance company. Four, learned counsel for the complainant invoked an order of the Hon’ble Apex Court, (2017) 9 SCC 724, Om Prakash Vs. Reliance General Ins. And Anr., in Civil Appeal No.15611 of 2017 decided on October 4, 2017, para 10 thereof, which reads as under:

“It is common knowledge that a person who lost his vehicle may not straightaway go to the Insurance Company to claim compensation. At first, he will make efforts to trace the vehicle. It is true that the owner has to intimate the insurer immediately after the theft of the vehicle. However, this condition should not bar settlement of genuine claims particularly when the delay in intimation or submission of documents is due to unavoidable circumstances. The decision of the insurer to reject the claim has to be based on valid grounds. Rejection of the claims on purely technical grounds in a mechanical manner will result in loss of confidence of policy-holders in the insurance industry. If the reason for delay in making a claim is satisfactorily explained, such a claim cannot be rejected on the ground of delay. It is also necessary to state here that it would not be fair and reasonable to reject genuine claims which had already been verified and found to be correct by the Investigator. The condition regarding the delay shall not be a shelter to repudiate the insurance claims which have been otherwise proved to be genuine. It needs no emphasis that the Consumer Protection Act aims at providing better protection of the interest of consumers. It is a beneficial legislation that deserves liberal construction. This laudable object should not be forgotten while considering the claims made under the Act.”

It is quite clear that the essence of this citation has been entirely lost on the complainant. A case of a lost private under certain circumstances can indeed perhaps not be repudiated taking shelter under the conditions of delay in intimation. Even here, the key is that the delay must be satisfactorily expl

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

ained, and if so explained, then and only then, a genuine claim may not be repudiated. In sharp contrast, in the instant case, the facts are completely different and adverse to the complainant’s case viz. (i) it is not an individual who has lost his personal vehicle; rather, it is company which claims it’s goods were unloaded en route; (ii) it is a company engaged in the business of selling oil for profits, which had, through a declaration under a marine policy, insured a particular journey carrying mustard oil from Bharatpur to Guwahati; (iii) after the consignment was way laid mid-way, the company took six months to report to the police and the OP insurance company; and (iv) no attempt to explain why such a delay took place was made. It stands to reason that any loss of this kind would hurt the company and would certainly have been reported to the nearest police station/outpost and the OP as quickly as possible. This was not done. Not only was it not done, no explanation was forthcoming. Such an inordinate delay without even an attempted explanation is a very material lapse and cannot help the complainant’s case. Five, it is also clear that when the vehicle was so unloaded at Barauni, and thereafter, when no payment nor a non-delivery certificate was received from the consignee at Guwahati, no action whatsoever was taken by the complainant. This lends further credence to the view that the complainant had, to begin with, no case at all. 10. Clearly, the District Forum and the State Commission, in the second round of litigation before them, erred in not taking note of these obvious adverse material facts and irregularities. An insurance contract is a contract of utmost good faith. Complainant’s conduct has not been true to this principle. All facts have to be credible and have to be established through evidence. In the instant case, this was far from the case. 11. In view of discussion above, this revision petition succeeds. The impugned order of the State Commission is set aside as also that of the District Forum. The consumer complaint, in the result, stands dismissed. No order as to costs.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

21-10-2020 UETC India Ltd., New Delhi Versus United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Chennai National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
15-10-2020 Ajay Gupta Versus Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Company Limited National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
15-10-2020 Senior Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India Versus Rajesh Kumar National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
14-10-2020 The Regional Manager National Insurance Company Limited, Bengaluru Versus Sathi @ K. Sathya & Others High Court of Karnataka
14-10-2020 Shantabai Laxman Doiphode Versus The State of Maharashtra, Through Principal Secretary, Industries & Labour Department & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
12-10-2020 Naresh Kumar Sinha, Company Secretary, M/s Oil And Natural Gas Corporation Limited, Jeevan Bharti, New Delhi & Others Versus Union of India Rep. By The Labour Enforcement Officer Central Tripura West & Another High Court of Gauhati
09-10-2020 OOO Insurance Company Chubb Versus Enka Insaat Ve Sanayi AS United Kingdom Supreme Court
08-10-2020 C. Rajakumari & Another Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Secretary to Government, Department of Industries (MIA), Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
08-10-2020 Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Through Chief Manager Versus Seetakanta Patnaik National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
06-10-2020 Jewellery World, Orissa Versus Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Orissa National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
06-10-2020 Small Industries Development Bank of India, Chennai & Others Versus Creation Investments Equitas Holdings LLC A wholly owned subsidiary of Creation Investments Social Ventures Fund II LP, United States of America & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-10-2020 United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Rasipuram & Others Versus Arukkani & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-10-2020 United India Insurance Company Limited, Udumalpet Versus N. Thangavel, & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
05-10-2020 Tarun Kanti Chowdhury & Others Versus Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
01-10-2020 Bayer New Zealand Limited Versus Ministry For Primary Industries Court of Appeal of New Zealand
01-10-2020 The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Kumbakonam, Represented by its Branch manager, Kumbakonam Versus Nirmala & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-10-2020 The Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Vellore Versus M. Suresh & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
29-09-2020 Mangala & Others Versus National Insurance Company Limited, (Ori. Respondent) Through its Manager In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
29-09-2020 Alok Industries Limited Versus Securities & Exchange Board of India SEBI Securities amp Exchange Board of India Securities Appellate Tribunal
29-09-2020 Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Raipur Versus Brahmanand Javvadi National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
29-09-2020 National Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus Yuraj Yadu Sawant & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
29-09-2020 National Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus Yuraj Yadu Sawant & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
28-09-2020 M/s. Shankar Jewels & Others Versus United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Rajasthan & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
28-09-2020 M/s. Tata Aig General Insurance Co. Ltd., Maharashtra Versus T. Paul Raj National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
28-09-2020 National Insurance Co. Ltd., Divisional Office, Panaji, Goa, Now Represented by its Regional Manager, Bengaluru Versus Imran Khan & Others High Court of Karnataka
28-09-2020 The Managing Director, KSRTC, Central Offices, Represented by its Divisional Controller, Mangaluru Versus National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Another High Court of Karnataka
25-09-2020 United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Kumbakonam Versus Natarajan & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
25-09-2020 Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd., Madurai Versus Tamilarasan & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
23-09-2020 Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd., Rajasthan Versus Nirmala Devi & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
23-09-2020 Charu Sharma & Others Versus Birla Sun Life Insurance Company Ltd., Maharshtra & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
23-09-2020 Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited, Namakkal Versus Shanmugam & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
22-09-2020 Elite International Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai Versus United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Chennai & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
22-09-2020 Bhilai Engineering Corporation Ltd., Through Madhavdas K., Authorised Signatory Bec Nandinin Road Industrial Area, Chhattisgarh Versus United India Insurance Company Ltd. Through Senior Divisional Manager, Chhattisgarh National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
22-09-2020 The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Through- Its Divisional Manager, Chhattisgarh Versus Vivek Giri & Another High Court of Chhattisgarh
22-09-2020 The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Through- Its Divisional Manager, Chhattisgarh Versus Vivek Giri & Another High Court of Chhattisgarh
21-09-2020 Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi Versus M/s. Guptasons Jewellers & Gems Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
21-09-2020 Branch Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd., Chitradurga & Others Versus D. Mallappa & Another High Court of Karnataka
21-09-2020 The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Coimbatore & Another Versus N. Dhanalakshmi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
18-09-2020 Heinz India Private Limited Versus National Insurance Company Limited & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
16-09-2020 Manager [Legal], Reliance General Insurance Company, Chennai Versus Jeya & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
15-09-2020 The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Bengaluru Versus Vishwanatha & Another High Court of Karnataka
15-09-2020 United India Insurance Company Ltd., Through The Regional Manager, New Delhi Versus Dinesh Vijay National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
14-09-2020 United India Insurance Company Ltd., Represented by its Branch Manager, Vellore Versus Krishnaveni & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
11-09-2020 M/s. S.M. Cement Industries Rep. By One of Its Partners Namely, Manoj Sureka, Assam Versus Power Distribution Company Ltd. & Others High Court of Gauhati
11-09-2020 The Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd, Puducherry Versus Ulagaratchagan & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
10-09-2020 United India Insurance Company Ltd., Anna Salai, Versus Selvi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
09-09-2020 Pyar Singh Versus Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Rajasthan & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
08-09-2020 The United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Chidambaram Versus Emili & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
07-09-2020 United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Through its Divisional Manager, Osmanpura, Aurangabad Versus Chandrakala & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
04-09-2020 Tata AIG General Insurance Company Limited Through Its Manager, Maharashtra Versus Banshiram Bishnoi National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
03-09-2020 M/s.United India Insurance Company Ltd., Namakkal. Versus Allimuthu @ Sengodan & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
03-09-2020 National Insurance Company Limited, Raipur Versus Khorin Bai Sori & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
03-09-2020 National Insurance Company Limited, Raipur Versus Khorin Bai Sori & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
03-09-2020 United India Insurance Company Limited, through its Divisional Manager, Bilaspur (C.G.) Versus Joidha Bai Patel & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
01-09-2020 National Insurance Company Limited Versus Ashwani Kumari & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
01-09-2020 M/s. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Rep. By its Divisional Manager, Arani Versus Raja & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-09-2020 MS Industries & Spirits (P) Ltd. Versus M/s. Allied Blenders & Distillers Pvt Ltd. High Court of for the State of Telangana
31-08-2020 M/s. AAF India Private Limited, Rep. by its Authorised Signatory Jagruti Mursenia Versus M/s. KBR Industries, Represented by its Partner High Court of Karnataka
31-08-2020 Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd., Sundaram Towers, Chennai Versus Manickam & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
31-08-2020 Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd., Sundaram Towers, Chennai Versus Manickam & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-08-2020 Shriram General Insurance Co.Ltd., E.B.RIICO Industrial Area, Rajasthan Versus Chinnaraj & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-08-2020 Master Vinay Bharadwaj, Rep. by his Father & Natural Guardian D.R. Shivakumar Versus M/s. United India Insurance Company Limited, Bangalore & Another High Court of Karnataka
26-08-2020 Oriental Insurance Company Limited Versus Nand Kishore Sharma & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
25-08-2020 The Deputy General Manager, Small Industries Development Bank of India, Coimbatore & Another Versus M/s. Annamalai Hotels (Pvt.) Ltd., Rep.by its Managing Director, P. Velusamy, Coimbatore High Court of Judicature at Madras
25-08-2020 United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Chennai Versus Maragatham & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
25-08-2020 Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd., Chhattisgarh Versus Indra Bai & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
24-08-2020 United Conveyor Corporation (India) Private Limited Versus Pravash Kumar Mukherjee High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
24-08-2020 Sanjay Khandelwal Versus Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
24-08-2020 United India Insurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi Versus Singhla Engineers & Contractors Pvt. Ltd. & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
21-08-2020 L.V. Subba Reddy Petrol Bank Versus Indian Oil Corporation Limited High Court of Andhra Pradesh
21-08-2020 M/s. Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd., Chennai Versus Parvathi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
21-08-2020 United India Insurance Company Limited Versus Narinder Kour & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
20-08-2020 K. Manikkan, Railway Liason Officer, Malabar Cements Limited, Walayar Versus The State of Kerala, Represented by The Principal Secretary, Industries (H) Department, Thiruvananthapuram & Others High Court of Kerala
19-08-2020 L. Ahmed Abdul Razack Versus State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by Secretary to Government, Industries Department, Chennai & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
19-08-2020 Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. Through Constituent Attorney, Rajasthan Versus Baldev Singh National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
19-08-2020 Vijay Cotton & Fibre Co., Maharashtra Versus New India Insurance Company Ltd., Maharashtra & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-08-2020 Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi Versus Astha Cement Pvt. Ltd. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-08-2020 Premchand Jute & Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Another Versus The Employees State Insurance Corporation & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
18-08-2020 M/s. Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, Tirupur Versus S. Veeramani & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
17-08-2020 M/S Anjaneya Bisanpur Agro Industries Pvt. Ltd Versus Dilawar Singh Rawat & Another High Court of Delhi
17-08-2020 Branch Manager, Reliance Nippon Life Insurance Co. Ltd., (Formerly Known As Reliance Life Insurance Co. Ltd.), Madhya Pradesh & Another Versus Lekhram Avadhiya National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
14-08-2020 United India Insurance Company Limited, District Raipur & Another Versus Rahi Solanki & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
07-08-2020 National Insurance Company Ltd., Third Floor, No.751, Anna Salai, Chennai Versus Vijaya & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
07-08-2020 The Divisional Manager, M/s. National Insurance Co. Ltd., Vellore Versus Paneerselvam & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-08-2020 Adith Suresh (minor), ‘Anugraha', Thavakkara West, Kannur Versus The Managing Director, ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company ltd., Mumbai & Another Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
06-08-2020 The Branch Manager, M/s Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Kodungallur Versus M.M. Jose Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
06-08-2020 Dinesh Shetty & Another Versus State of Karnataka, Rep. by its Secretary Department of Commerce & Industries, Bengaluru & Others High Court of Karnataka
06-08-2020 Rajiv Bal Versus Harrison Industries, New Delhi & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
06-08-2020 Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd., Rajasthan Versus Kailash Chand Sharma National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
06-08-2020 M/s. Perfectpac Ltd., Haryana Versus United India Insurance Company Limited (Through Its Divisional Manager/Branch Manager/ Authrised Signatory) & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
05-08-2020 The United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Maharasthra State, Represented By Its Deputy Manager, Regional Office, Ernakulam Versus Rijawana Jamshed Mulla & Others High Court of Kerala
04-08-2020 Birla Sun Life Insurance Co. Ltd. & Now Known As Aditiya Birla Sun Life Insurance Co. Ltd.), Maharashtra & Another Versus Narendra Pundlik Ramteke National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
04-08-2020 R.V. Granites, rep. by its Managing Partner S. Padmavathi Versus State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Principal Secretary, Industries & Commerce (Mines.II) Department Amaravati & Others High Court of Andhra Pradesh
04-08-2020 ECOM Gill Coffee Trading Private Limited, Rep. by its Authorised Signatory Shailendra Singh Versus M/s. Vittal Cashew Industries, Represented by its Partner H. Ganesh Kamath & Others High Court of Karnataka
04-08-2020 M/s. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Coimbatore Versus Murugammal & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-08-2020 Kaizen Organics Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur Versus National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
01-08-2020 The National Insurance Company Ltd., Divisional Office II, Salem Versus. Raja & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
31-07-2020 United India Insurance Co., Ltd., Chennai & Another Versus Suseela Jothi Mary Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
31-07-2020 United India Insurance Co., Ltd., Chennai & Another Versus Suseela Jothi Mary Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
31-07-2020 National Insurance Co. Ltd. Through Rajesh Kumar Dy. Manager, New Delhi Versus Biking Food Products (P) Ltd., Telangana National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC