w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited, Ramanathapuram v/s T. Saravanan & Another


Company & Directors' Information:- UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED [Active] CIN = U93090TN1938GOI000108

Company & Directors' Information:- J B UNITED PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U93000MH2014PTC258844

Company & Directors' Information:- J B UNITED PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999MH2014PTC258844

Company & Directors' Information:- UNITED CORPORATION LIMITED [Liquidated] CIN = U99999TN1942PLC003159

    C.M.A.(MD)No. 317 of 2018 & C.M.P.(MD)No. 4270 of 2018

    Decided On, 07 January 2020

    At, Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court

    By, THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. THARANI

    For the Appellant: I. Suthakaran, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, H. Velavadhas, Advocate, R2, No appearance.



Judgment Text


(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section173 of Motor Vehicles Act, against the award and decree dated 06.12.2017 made in M.C.O.P.No.33 of 2013 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Chief Judicial Magistrate Court), Ramanathapuram.)

1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the award, dated 06.12.2017 made in M.C.O.P.No.33 of 2013, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Chief Judicial Magistrate Court), Ramanathapuram.

2. The appellant herein is the second respondent, the first respondent herein is the claimant and the second respondent herein is the first respondent in the original proceedings. The first respondent / claimant filed a petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in M.C.O.P.No.33 of 2013, seeking compensation for the injuries sustained by him in the accident, dated 15.11.2012. The Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.6,97,877/- with interest at the rate of 9%. Against which, the appellant preferred this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

3. The case of the claimant in M.C.O.P.No.33 of 2013 is as follows:

On 15.04.2012, the petitioner was riding a two wheeler, bearing Registration No. TN 01 AP 9645 to supervise the building work of the first respondent. After supervising the building work, the claimant was returning back at about 2.00 pm along the Rameswaram National Highways on left side of the road, observing all the road Rules. The offending vehicle which was driven in a rash and negligent manner, came from the backside of the petitioner and dashed against the vehicle. Due to that accident, the petitioner sustained injuries on the backside of the hip area and in the left leg. Thereafter, the petitioner was admitted in Coimbatore Ganga Hospital and was treated as inpatient for 38 days and subsequently, he took treatment as out patient. The petitioner has undergone nine operations and plates were affixed in the hip and in the left leg of the petitioner. A case in Crime No.204 of 2012 was registered under Section 229 and 337 I.P.C. Since the accident took place at the time of employment, both the first and second respondents are liable to pay compensation to the petitioner.

4. Brief substance of the counter of the first respondent / Ramesh, in M.C.O.P.No.33 of 2013 is as follows:

The first respondent is not aware of the accident. Without identifying the vehicle which, hit and run the petitioner, the petitioner filed a petition against the first respondent, which is not acceptable. The petitioner has to prove that he was having valid driving licence at the time of accident. Since the vehicle is insured with the second respondent, the petition has to be dismissed as against the first respondent.

5. Brief substance of the counter of the second respondent / Insurance Company, in M.C.O.P.No.33 of 2013 is as follows:

The second respondent is the insurer of the first respondent. The age, income and nature of injury is to be proved by the petitioner. The claim of the petitioner is not acceptable, because there is no disability to the petitioner.

6. Two witnesses were examined [P.W.1 and P.W.2] and eleven documents were marked [Exs.P1 to P.11] on the side of the petitioner. Three witnesses were examined [R.W.1 to R.W.3] and two documents were marked [Exs.R1 and R.2] on the side of the respondents.

7. After considering both sides, the Tribunal awarded compensation to the claimant. Against which, the appellant preferred this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

8. On the side of the appellant, it is stated that it is a clear case of "hit and run". The vehicle, which hit the claimant's vehicle was not traced out and the hit and run incident was admitted in the petition itself. This award is a nullity as a Motor Vehicles Claims Tribunal passed an award under the Workmen Compensation Act. The claimant can choose only one Tribunal and he has to proceed either under the Motor Vehicles Act or under the Workmen Compensation Act. The claimant borrowed the vehicle of the first respondent and met with an accident and there is no third party coverage in the insurance and the award under the Motor Vehicles Act is not possible. The petitioner has to approach the Workmen Compensation Commissioner, to get compensation under the Workmen Compensation Act.

9. On the side of the appellant, it is stated that the accident said to have taken place on 15.04.2012 at Ramadhapuram but the claimant was admitted in Ganga Hospital, Coimbatore, on the same date and the accident was reported to the police only on 17.12.2012 and there is a suspicion over the place of accident. It is further stated that the vehicle, which is said to have hit the claimant's vehicle was not traced out and it is only a hit and run case, where the remedy is only through Government Forum.

10. On the side of the appellant, it is further stated that the Doctor, who gave treatment was not able to prove the disability at 65% and the medical bills were not proved and the Tribunal is wrong in fixing the disability at 60% and in accepting the medical bill to the tune of Rs.4,26,029/- and to award transport expenses to the tune of Rs.70,000/- and that under the Workmen Compensation Act the claimant must be examined by a qualified Doctor to prove his disability and that under Section 2(1) of Workmen Compensation Act, the examination of the qualified Doctor is necessary and hence, the award has to be set aside.

11. On the side of the first respondent, it is stated that the claimant is a Civil Engineer and the M.C.O.P. was filed under Section 163-A, the Doctor has fixed the disability as 65%. A judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court published in CDJ 2013 SC 955 [United India Insurance Company Ltd Vs. Sunisl Kumar and another] is cited. It is further stated that though the claimant claims Rs.10 lakhs as compensation, the Tribunal has awarded only Rs.6,97,029/- and that the compensation has to be enhanced.

12. On the side of the appellant, it is stated that the appeal filed by the claimant for enhancement of the compensation was already dismissed for default. The first respondent / claimant is entitled only for a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- for his disability for hit and run case. It is further stated that the petition was only filed under Section 163

(A) of the Motor Vehicles Act, but, in the award Sections 140, 166 and 163 (A) were included, the respondent cannot claim compensation under the Workmen Compensation Act, he has filed only a petition under Section 163 (A) of the Motor Vehicles Act. The claimant has to file a petition under the Workmen Compensation Act based on the contract between the employer and the insurance Company, but, the claimant is on a different footing before a wrong Forum and the award was wrongly granted. The quantum awarded is excessive and the interest also is excessive and the remedy available to the petitioner / claimant is only before the Workmen Compensation Forum and not before the Motor Claims Accidents Tribunal.

13. On the side of the first respondent, it is stated that the claim petition was under Section 163 (A) of the Motor Vehicle Act, the disability was fixed under the Workmen Compensation Act and the claim of the petitioner in M.C.O.P is not affected Doctor was examined and the disability of 60% was proved. A judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court published in CDJ 213 SC 955 cited, wherein the Supreme Court has held that once it was established that the death or permanent disablement acquired in the accident and if the offending vehicle is insured, the Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation on behalf of the owner, which is a statutory obligation.

14. It is seen that in the citation referred by the respondent, the Apex Court has not given any finding and referred the matter before the Larger Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court headed by the Hon'ble Chief Justice of India. In the above circumstances, the citation referred supra is not applicable to the facts of the present case.

15. It is seen that the claimant filed a petition under Section 163 (A) of the Motor Vehicles Act and the claimant is said to have been an employee of the first respondent. It is stated that the accident took place during the course of employment and while passing the award the Tribunal has observed that the claimant is an employee of the first respondent and he is entitled to claim compensation under the Workmen Compensation Act and give a finding that the second respondent / appellant as the insurer of the first respondent / second respondent herein, is liable to pay compensation to the claimant / first respondent herein. It is seen that there is an apparent error in the findings of the Tribunal. The Tribunal is quiet confused whether the award of compensation is to be given under the Workmen Compensation Act or under the Motor Vehicles Act. The findings in issue No.2 is that the first respondent is liable to pay compensation as the employer of the claimant and not as the owner of the vehicle.

16. The Tribunal make contrary observations in Paragraph Nos.10, 11 and 15, regarding the relationship of e

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

mployer and employee between the first and second respondents and has observed that as the employer of the claimant, the second respondent is liable to pay compensation. Whether the award was passed under the Motor Vehicles Act or under the Motor Vehicles Act is not specifically stated in the order of the Tribunal. The Tribunal has failed to consider the defence raised by the appellant. 17. In the above circumstances, liberty is given to the first respondent herein / claimant to approach the Workmen Compensation Tribunal without any question on limitation. If the first respondent / claimant filed a petition, the Workmen Compensation Tribunal, shall condone the delay. 18. With the above observation, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed and the award and decree dated 06.12.2017 made in M.C.O.P.No.33 of 2013 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Chief Judicial Magistrate Court), Ramanathapuram, is set aside. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

01-10-2020 The Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Vellore Versus M. Suresh & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
28-09-2020 M/s. Shankar Jewels & Others Versus United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Rajasthan & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
25-09-2020 United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Kumbakonam Versus Natarajan & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
23-09-2020 Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited, Namakkal Versus Shanmugam & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
22-09-2020 Elite International Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai Versus United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Chennai & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
22-09-2020 Bhilai Engineering Corporation Ltd., Through Madhavdas K., Authorised Signatory Bec Nandinin Road Industrial Area, Chhattisgarh Versus United India Insurance Company Ltd. Through Senior Divisional Manager, Chhattisgarh National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
15-09-2020 United India Insurance Company Ltd., Through The Regional Manager, New Delhi Versus Dinesh Vijay National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
14-09-2020 United India Insurance Company Ltd., Represented by its Branch Manager, Vellore Versus Krishnaveni & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
10-09-2020 United India Insurance Company Ltd., Rajasthan Versus M/s. Radhika Oil Industries, Rajasthan National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
09-09-2020 Pyar Singh Versus Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Rajasthan & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
08-09-2020 The United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Chidambaram Versus Emili & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
07-09-2020 United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Through its Divisional Manager, Osmanpura, Aurangabad Versus Chandrakala & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
03-09-2020 M/s.United India Insurance Company Ltd., Namakkal. Versus Allimuthu @ Sengodan & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-09-2020 M/s. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Rep. By its Divisional Manager, Arani Versus Raja & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-08-2020 Master Vinay Bharadwaj, Rep. by his Father & Natural Guardian D.R. Shivakumar Versus M/s. United India Insurance Company Limited, Bangalore & Another High Court of Karnataka
25-08-2020 United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Chennai Versus Maragatham & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
24-08-2020 United India Insurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi Versus Singhla Engineers & Contractors Pvt. Ltd. & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
21-08-2020 United India Insurance Company Limited Versus Narinder Kour & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
14-08-2020 United India Insurance Company Limited, District Raipur & Another Versus Rahi Solanki & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
06-08-2020 M/s. Perfectpac Ltd., Haryana Versus United India Insurance Company Limited (Through Its Divisional Manager/Branch Manager/ Authrised Signatory) & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
05-08-2020 The United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Maharasthra State, Represented By Its Deputy Manager, Regional Office, Ernakulam Versus Rijawana Jamshed Mulla & Others High Court of Kerala
04-08-2020 M/s. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Coimbatore Versus Murugammal & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
31-07-2020 United India Insurance Co., Ltd., Chennai & Another Versus Suseela Jothi Mary Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
31-07-2020 United India Insurance Co., Ltd., Chennai & Another Versus Suseela Jothi Mary Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
23-07-2020 The Divisional Manager, M/s. United India Insurance Company Limited, Vellore Versus M. Amavasai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
07-07-2020 The Chairman & Managing Director, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Chennai Versus Rajini & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
30-06-2020 M/s. United India Insurance Company Limited Versus Md. Khayyumkhan & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
30-06-2020 Bilsy Joseph, now residing at 3743, Falkner Drive, United States of America, Represented by her Power of Attorney holder (Mother), Rosamma Joseph, Kottayam Versus Registrar of Births & Deaths, Changanassery Muncipality, Kottayam & Others High Court of Kerala
25-06-2020 United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus Amar Singh Raghuwanshi National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
23-06-2020 M/s. Jain Textiles, Ashok Jain Versus United India Insurance Company Ltd. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
12-06-2020 M.H. Uma Maheshwari & Others Versus United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Another Supreme Court of India
04-06-2020 M/s. United India Insurance Company Limited, Chennai Versus N. Prathap & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
03-06-2020 PUEBLO HOLDINGS LIMITED, Rep. by its authorised signatory Siddhesh Sham Kshirsagar Versus EMIRATES TRADING AGENCY LLC, A company incorporated under the appropriate laws of the United Arab Emirates having its registered office and/or business address at ETA Star House, United Arab Emirates & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-05-2020 United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Pune Regional Office, through its Divisional Office & Others Versus Shriniwas Ramayya Kamtam & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
30-04-2020 United Nurses Association, Through Its State President Shoby Joseph, Thrissur Versus Union Of India, Represented By The Secretary, New Delhi & Another High Court of Kerala
15-04-2020 United Nurses Association Through Its President Versus Union of India & Others Supreme Court of India
18-03-2020 United India Insurance Company Limited Versus Mora Devi High Court of Rajasthan Jodhpur Bench
12-03-2020 United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Tiruppur Versus Kaveriammal & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
11-03-2020 S. Mahadevan Versus The General Manager, (Appellate Authority) Personnel Department, United India Insurance Company Ltd., Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
11-03-2020 Agrocel Industries Pvt. Ltd. Versus United India Insurance Company Ltd. High Court of Judicature at Bombay
11-03-2020 M/s. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Div. Office- I, Secunderabad Versus Syed Mohd. Rayees & Another High Court of for the State of Telangana
05-03-2020 United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Chennai Versus B. Sudha & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-03-2020 Nirmala Kothari Versus United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Supreme Court of India
03-03-2020 United India Insurance Company Limited Versus Yechuri Nirmala & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
03-03-2020 United Bank of India, West Bengal Versus Ranjan Basu & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
02-03-2020 Geetha & Others Versus United India Insurance Company Limited, Neyveli High Court of Judicature at Madras
20-02-2020 United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Motor TP Claims Hub, Represented by its Manager Versus T. Thimmanna & Others High Court of Karnataka
20-02-2020 S. Senguttuvel & Others Versus The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Co., Ltd., Salem & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
18-02-2020 Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Vellore V/S Rani & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
14-02-2020 M/s. Baspa Organics Limited V/S United India Insurance Company Limited Supreme Court of India
12-02-2020 The United Goans Foundation, through its Secretary Avinash Tavares Versus The State of Goa through its Chief Secretary, Secretariat & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
10-02-2020 United Bank of India V/S Ashok Kumar Kalra and Others. Debts Recovery Tribunal Delhi
10-02-2020 United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Another Versus C. Meenakshi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-02-2020 Canara Bank Versus M/s. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Others Supreme Court of India
06-02-2020 Rakesh Chandra Savita Versus United India Insurance Company Limited, Through Divisional Manager & Another Madya Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Bhopal
06-02-2020 M/s. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Basheerbagh, Hyderabad Versus Syed Rehmath Ali & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
05-02-2020 United India Insurance Company Ltd. Versus Md Nur Mohamed High Court of Gauhati
03-02-2020 Rajesh Narula Versus United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Through Branch Manager Madya Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Bhopal
31-01-2020 The Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited, Cuddalore Versus Purushothaman (died) & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
31-01-2020 Shyam Manohar Harit Versus CPIO United India Insurance Company Ltd. Central Information Commission
31-01-2020 The Manager, United India Insurance Company Ltd., Chennai Versus C. Kavitha & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
31-01-2020 The Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd, Madurai. Versus Muthammal & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
31-01-2020 B. Alphonse Legori Versus CPIO /Manager United India Insurance Company Ltd. Central Information Commission
30-01-2020 The Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Hosur & Another Versus Vediyappan & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
28-01-2020 United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Rep. by its Deputy General Manager Versus D. Sunderarajan High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-01-2020 United Mine Workers Union Through Shri Puti Gaonkar General Secretary Versus Union of India, Through Secretary, (Ministry of Labour and Employment) & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
25-01-2020 United India Insurance Company Limited Versus Bhilai Engineering Corporation Ltd. Chhatisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Raipur
23-01-2020 United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Gujarat Versus Mukesh Parikh & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
23-01-2020 United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Gujarat Versus Mukesh Parikh Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
23-01-2020 Mukesh Parikh & Another Versus United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Tamil Nadu National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
23-01-2020 Prashant Versus United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Maharashtra National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
23-01-2020 Prashant Versus United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Through Its Assistant Manager Authorised Signatory, Maharashtra National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
22-01-2020 M/s United India Insurance Company Limited, Tadepallygudem Versus V. Narahari Sharma & Another High Court of for the State of Telangana
21-01-2020 M/s. BCPL Railway Infrastructure Ltd. Versus The Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
20-01-2020 Shri Gas Service Versus United India Insurance Co. & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-01-2020 Amrita Sarkar (Ghosh) & Another Versus United Bank of India & Another Tripura State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Agartala
17-01-2020 Sangrur Sales Corporation Versus United India Insurance Company Limited & Another Supreme Court of India
10-01-2020 United India Insurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi Versus Urmila Agarwal & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
09-01-2020 United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus Shindutai Wasudeorao Thakare & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
09-01-2020 United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus Tila Kumari Giri & Others High Court of Punjab and Haryana
08-01-2020 Sunita Bhalla Versus United Inida Insurance Co Ltd. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
08-01-2020 United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus Reshma & Others High Court of Delhi
07-01-2020 United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus Gopal Agencies National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
07-01-2020 United India Insurance Co Ltd. Versus Sandeep Kumar Bubna National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
07-01-2020 United Indian Insurance Company Limited, Through its Branch Manager Versus Ujwala Salgonkar & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
07-01-2020 United India Insurance Co Ltd. Versus Sandeep Kumar Bubna Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Mumbai
07-01-2020 Ramkhiladi & Another Versus The United India Insurance Company & Another Supreme Court of India
03-01-2020 Nalini Bala Cold Storage Private Limited and Others. V/S United Bank of India and Others. Debts Recovery Tribunal Kolkata
03-01-2020 Ajit Singh Versus United India Insurance Company Limited, Haryana & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
20-12-2019 Global United Shipping India Private Limited, (formerly known as Jalhansa Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.), Represented by its Director, Prem Kumar Menon, Chennai Versus Traffic Manager, Chennai Port Trust, Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-12-2019 The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Co. Limited, Rep. The Divisional Manager, Raichur Versus Mallamma & Others High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench At Dharwad
18-12-2019 M/s. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. V/S M/s. Tarapore & Co., Represented by Partner N. Radhakrishnan High Court of Judicature at Madras
18-12-2019 United India Insurance Company Ltd. Versus Raj Kumari & Others High Court of Punjab and Haryana
17-12-2019 United India Insurance Company Limited & Others Versus Kunti Binod Pande & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
12-12-2019 Dincy Devassy Versus United India Insurance Co. & Others High Court of Delhi
06-12-2019 United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Tiruppur V/S Arundhati Ghoshal & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-12-2019 United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Another Versus M.M. Hamza Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
29-11-2019 M/s. United India Insurance Co. Limited, rep. by its Branch Manager Versus Bagili Mallesham & Another High Court of for the State of Telangana
27-11-2019 The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus Rameshrao Bapuraoji Gulhane & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
26-11-2019 United India Insurance Company Ltd. Versus Ravindra & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad