w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Sunil Mehra v/s The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)


Company & Directors' Information:- SUNIL & CO PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U32109WB1984PTC037810

Company & Directors' Information:- A. MEHRA AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51109DL2000PTC105672

    Bail Appln. No. 2378 of 2017

    Decided On, 20 July 2018

    At, High Court of Delhi

    By, THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

    For the Petitioner: Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate, R.K. Thakur, Advocates. For the Respondent: Rajni Gupta, APP, Mohit Mathur, Sr. Advocate, Aman Sareen, Nishant Pathak Gurpratap Singh, Advocates.



Judgment Text

1. By this application the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.174/2017 under Sections 406/34 IPC registered at PS Rajinder Nagar on the complaint of Deepak Gambhir.

2. In the complaint Deepak Gambhir alleged that he was residing at 6B/8, Old Rajinder Nagar and have been doing business of cloth at Gandhi Nagar in the name of Yogesh Trading Company. According to him he used to do cash transactions of Rs.2.5 to Rs.3 crores daily. The petitioner, who is a resident of 3/15, Second Floor, East Patel Nagar, is an agent of cloth and thus Deepak Gambhir knew him for the last 12-15 years due to the long business relationship. As the house of the complainant was under construction for 3-4 months, it was risky for him to keep cash at his house. Besides, his father-in-law was unwell and he had to frequently visit the hospital. Therefore, he gave Rs.2 crores to Sunil Mehra, the petitioner herein, for keeping safely. Rs.1 crore was given to him by the complainant at his residence in front of Pradeep Gattani and Parveen Gadhok and Rs.1 crore was given by his nephew Gagan and his driver Jait Ram to Sakshi Mehra, wife of Sunil Mehra and his son Vaibhav Mehra at their residence. This amount was to be returned by him on 3rd October, 2016. On 1st October, 2017, father-in-law of the complainant expired. Sunil Mehra came to the cremation ground at 4.00 P.M. and thereafter went to his house. After about half an hour, the complainant received a call from Sunil Mehra that a theft had taken place in his house and all the money had been stolen. The complainant, his younger brother and his nephew Gagan reached the house of Sunil Mehra and saw that he had called the police but surprisingly no door was broken, the interlock of the iron door was as it is and besides the money of the complainant, nothing special had been stolen. The complainant asked Sunil Mehra to give the exact amount in the complaint to the police which had been handed over by the complainant to him and give a copy of FIR to him. When the complainant asked where he was yesterday, he replied that he had gone to Chandigarh to attend the business meeting and on a query as to where his mother, wife and son were, he stated that they had also gone with him to Chandigarh. As per the information of the complainant, petitioner had no business relations in Chandigarh and if the whole family had to go outside, they should not have left the money at home and handed over the same to him. According to the complainant Sunil Mehra in conspiracy with his wife and son, committed fraud on his money and lodged a fabricated report of theft which was bogus. When the complainant downloaded the copy of the FIR he was shocked to note that Sunil Mehra had not written the money which had been stolen though complainant had specifically told him to get the same written. On 6th October, 2017 he again came to know that Sunil Mehra had got registered another FIR for second theft in his house to destroy the remaining evidence. Thus the entire story of Sunil Mehra was fabricated to commit criminal breach of trust of the complainant’s money.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the story of the complainant is wholly improbable. In the FIR the complainant does not give the date when he entrusted the money and when this fact was argued on behalf of the petitioner a supplementary statement was recorded giving the two dates of entrustment as 21st September, 2017 and 29th September, 2017. According to the petitioner the bag had been handed over by the complainant 4 months ago and two polythene bags 1 month ago. However, the petitioner was not aware of the contents of the bag and they were lying as it is in the almirah. The theft took place when the petitioner and his family were not in Delhi and which was in the knowledge of the petitioner from the SMS sent by the petitioner to the complainant on 29th September, 2017 itself. The complainant cooked up the story and filed a false FIR against the petitioner. Further, even if accepting the version of the complainant that the two entrustments were on 21st and 29th September, 2017 respectively, the same is improbable as according to the complainant himself the renovation in his house was going on for the last 3-4 months.

4. Despite the fact that on the application of the petitioner the CDRs of the parties were directed to be taken, no scientific investigation has been conducted by the police. After registration of FIR, the petitioner has been called only once to join the investigation and thus he is not required for any further examination. The only purpose of custodial interrogation now is to cough up the money from the petitioner. The FSL report clearly shows forced entry into the house of the petitioner.

5. Learned APP for the State countering the contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FSL report does not show that there is a forced entry. The messages sent by the petitioner were clearly manipulated. Petitioner has not been cooperating and when he was called to join investigation it was a case of complete denial and thus there was no purpose of calling him any further. It is further stated that on the two FIRs of theft registered by the petitioner cancellation report has been prepared and despite the fact that an application for polygraph test by the petitioner was filed, petitioner refused to undergo the polygraph test. The petitioner does not deny entrustment of one bag and a polythene bag as per his own FIR though his case is that he did not know the contents of the polythene bag and the other bag which is highly unnatural. The bag which contained the money had a numerical lock which was found intact however, the money inside was missing. Further, if a stranger was to take the money he would take away the bag easily and not leave the bag there. The petitioner has deliberately misappropriated the cash entrusted to him and thus his custodial interrogation is required to recover the amount involved and to unearth the role of the other co-accused persons involved therein. Statements of independent witnesses have been recorded who have supported the case of the complainant. The witnesses have stated that the amount was counted by the accused persons before keeping in their possession and thus their claim that they were not aware of the contents of the bag and the polythene bag is incorrect.

6. Report of the FSL pursuant to the crime team inspection visit on 5th October, 2017 reads as under:-

'The undersigned along with the above mentioned team visited H No.-3/15, First Floor, East Patel Nagar, Delhi, where it was reported that theft has taken place at the aforesaid place. The scene of occurrence was examined and following observations were made.

1. There were two gates at the main entrance. The first gate was metallic with net framed and the second was wooden which was from inside.

2. At the time of visit the lock hole attached to the metallic gate from outside was found in half broken condition and the other half was found absent.

3. The lever lock system attached to metallic gate was found in locked and broken condition, from inside.

4. In the wooden gate there were two types of locking system. Both the locking systems were found intact.

5. No sign of any tool mark was observed on the corresponding places of respective locking systems in the main entrance door frame.

6. No sufficient gap between the frame and the door was found to damage the lock from outside to inside.

7. The entry door and the cabinets in the first room, situated in the right corner from main entrance, were also stated to be forced open.

8. The surrounding area of the locking system of the wooden door was found in broken condition.

9. The locking system was found in locked condition. However no prominent tool marks found on the corresponding places of respective locking system in the adjacent frames.

10. The locking system of the third cabinet was found in damaged condition although there were no signs of tool marks in the bolt and its corresponding hole in the wooden frame.

11. No sufficient gap between the frame and the cabinet door was found to damage the lock from outside to inside.

12. In the third room situated at the left corner from the main entrance, there were two cabinets. First cabinet locking system was found locked but the bolt lock was found in unlock condition.

No clue which could clearly indicate the forcible entry into the house from outside to inside and subsequently to the adjacent bedroom was found at the time of visit. Similarly, no clue which could clearly indicate the forcible opening of the cabinets was found at the time of visit.'

7. Version of the petitioner that he was not aware of the contents of the bag and the polythene bag cannot be believed for the reason as he stated that he thought it would be containing samples, in that case the complainant would not have kept the bag and the polythene bag in the almirah but would have kept it otherwise. Thus the very fact that the bag and the polythene bag were kept in the almirah, the petitioner was aware of the fact that the

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

same contained cash. No doubt in his complaint the complainant did not state the date of entrustment of the two tranches of money which was stated subsequently, however, the fact remains that the bag and the polythene bag from where money was stolen was lying in the care and custody of the petitioner. 8. As noted above, there was no clue for a clear conclusion to be drawn with regard to forcible entry from outside to inside or forcible opening of the cabinets. Further, as the petitioner was entrusted with money by the complainant though he had messaged that he was leaving for Chandigarh, however, he did not inform that the entire family was leaving in which case the petitioner was duty bound to return the money to the complainant. Considering the facts noted above this Court does not find the present case fit for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner as the contours of the entire offence committed and the manner in which it was committed is required to be unearthed. 9. Petition is dismissed.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

24-08-2020 B. Sunil Kumar & Another Versus Cochin University of Science & Technology, Rep. by Its Registrar & Others High Court of Kerala
14-08-2020 Sunil Chillalshetti & Others Versus State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Medical Education Department, Chhattisgarh & Another High Court of Chhattisgarh
13-08-2020 Sunil Agrawal Versus Chhattisgarh Environment Conservation Board, Through its Chairman, Naya Raipur (C.G.) & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
23-07-2020 Sunil Rathee & Others Versus The State of Haryana & Others Supreme Court of India
23-07-2020 Sunil N. Godhwani Versus State High Court of Delhi
13-07-2020 M/s. Vismaya Advertising, Ernakulam, Represented by Its Manager Sunil S. Menon & Another Versus The Intelligence Officer (IB), Department of Commercial Taxes, Mattancherry at Aluva & Others High Court of Kerala
07-07-2020 Sunil Yadavrao Beedkar Versus The Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
07-07-2020 Kamla Nehru Educational Society Thru Secy. Shri Sunil Dev & Others Versus State of U.P. Thru Secretary Housing & Urban Planning & Others High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
03-07-2020 K.J. Sunil Versus State of Kerala, Represented by The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam & Another High Court of Kerala
01-07-2020 Ishwar Chander & Another Versus Sunil Saran High Court of Punjab and Haryana
01-07-2020 Sree Gokula Chit & Finance Co (Pvt.) Ltd Versus Sunil Sabu High Court of Kerala
30-06-2020 Sunil Raj, Corrected As Susil Raj (The Name of the Petitioner typed as “Sunil Raj” in the cause title of the Memorandum of Crl.M.C., Synopsis, Index and petition for Interim Direction and on The Docket is corrected as “Susil Raj” as per order dated 12.11.2019 in CRL.M.A.No.1/2019 in CRL.M.C.No.1797/2017.) Versus Gopan & Another High Court of Kerala
25-06-2020 Rahul Mehra @ Daddu Versus State of Karnataka, State by Ramanagara Rural Police, Bangalore High Court of Karnataka
25-06-2020 Sunil @ Sunil Ashok Gadivaddar Versus State of Karnataka, Rep. by SPP, Bengaluru High Court of Karnataka
04-06-2020 Sunil Versus State of U.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
20-05-2020 Sunil Kumar Aledia Versus Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Others High Court of Delhi
29-04-2020 BCH Electric Limited Versus Pradeep Mehra Supreme Court of India
13-03-2020 M/s. Fossil India Private Limited, Represented by Sunil Prabhakaran Authorised Signatory Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Tax (Audit-5.4), Bengaluru & Others High Court of Karnataka
12-03-2020 Sunil Kumar Mishra Versus State High Court of Delhi
17-02-2020 Sunil Gandhi & Another V/S A.N. Buildwell Private Limited High Court of Delhi
13-02-2020 Rambabu Singh Thakur Versus Sunil Arora & Others Supreme Court of India
13-02-2020 M/s. Vadim Infrastructure Private Limited. (formerly M/s.VolTech Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Represented by its Director R. Rajamanickam Versus M/s. Sunil HiTech Engineers Ltd., Rep. by its Chairman & Managing Director & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-02-2020 Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Versus State of Kerala Reptd. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam High Court of Kerala
06-02-2020 Sunil Soni & Another Versus State of U.P. & Another High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
05-02-2020 Nandagopal Chetty & Another Versus Sunil & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-02-2020 Sunil Kumar, Director, Zephyr Entrance Coaching Centre, Kunnumpuram Versus C.S. Abdul Jabbar Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
30-01-2020 Sunil Polist Versus CPIO /Manager (CRM)/EDMS Life Insurance Corporation of India Central Information Commission
28-01-2020 Parsvnath Developers Limited Versus Sangeeta Mehra & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
21-01-2020 Sunil @ Sumit Versus State of Maharashtra In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
19-12-2019 B. Sunil Baliga Versus Sudir High Court of Karnataka
17-12-2019 Shweta @ Sakshi Versus Sunil High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench At Dharwad
12-12-2019 S. Sudarshan Versus G.M. Sunil Kumar High Court of Karnataka
11-12-2019 Sunil Bharti Mittal & Others Versus N. Naresh Kumar & Another High Court of Karnataka
11-12-2019 Sunil Pundalik Admile Versus Madhukar Tukaram Kshirsagar In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
06-12-2019 Dharmendra Prasad & Others Versus Sunil Kumar & Others Supreme Court of India
27-11-2019 Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement Versus Sunil Godhwani High Court of Delhi
21-11-2019 Sunil Versus Neethu High Court of Kerala
14-11-2019 Soma Barman Nee Datta Versus Sunil Chandra Podder & Others West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
04-11-2019 Sunil Bhai Sheth Versus M/s. Agricore Commodities Pvt. Ltd. & Others Supreme Court of India
01-11-2019 Mehra Cosmetics Versus Ram Kumar Gulati & Others High Court of Delhi
15-10-2019 Miraj Medical Centre Miraj through Medical Superintendent & Others Versus Sunil Tukaram Danane & Another High Court of Judicature at Bombay
11-10-2019 Less Than Equals Three Services Pvt. Ltd. & Another Versus Paras Mehra & Others High Court of Delhi
27-09-2019 P.S. Abhiram Sunil Versus Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Science, Represented By Its Registrar, Bengaluru & Another High Court of Karnataka
20-09-2019 Sunil Versus State of Maharashtra & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
20-09-2019 Sharmila Mukhopadhyay Versus Sunil Kanti Barua, Rep by his Constituted Attorney - Prasanta Bose & Others West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
16-09-2019 Sunil Eknath Bajaj & Others Versus Maheshwari Seva Trust & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
11-09-2019 Sunil Kumar Agarwal Versus State of U.P. & Another High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
03-09-2019 M/s. Balaji Ginning Factory, through Its Proprietor – Sunil Chiranjilal Bajaj Versus Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
22-08-2019 M/s. Haskoning B.V. Dutch Consulting Engineers & Architects rep. by its Power of Attorney holder Sunil Kumar Versus M/s. Kamarajar Port Ltd. High Court of Judicature at Madras
22-08-2019 Pawan Kumar Versus Sunil Kumar High Court of Punjab and Haryana
21-08-2019 Union of India & Others Versus T.R. Mehra Supreme Court of India
01-08-2019 Rohan Sunil Jain (Chavre) & Others Versus The State of Maharashtra, Through : the Police Sub-Inspector & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
17-07-2019 Sunil Muneshwar Yadav & Another Versus State of Maharashtra & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
17-07-2019 Atul Gulati & Another Versus Varsha Mehra & Others High Court of Delhi
17-07-2019 Ramanna Versus K.S. Sunil Gupta & Others High Court of Karnataka
16-07-2019 Lakhi Debi Jaiswal Versus Sunil Kumar Shaw West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
09-07-2019 Sunil Barve Versus State of M.P. & Others High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Indore
08-07-2019 Sunil Bhai Sheth Versus M/s. Agricore Commodities Pvt. Ltd. & Another High Court of Judicature at Bombay
04-07-2019 Sunil Appayya Matapathi Versus State of Karnataka High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench At Dharwad
03-07-2019 Rajeshwari Versus Sunil & Others High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench At Dharwad
02-07-2019 Sunil Vasudeva & Others Versus Sundar Gupta & Others Supreme Court of India
02-07-2019 Sunil Versus The State of Maharashtra In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
28-06-2019 Sunil Kumar Patel Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
25-06-2019 Sunil Kumar Santwani Versus State of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh
24-06-2019 For the Petitioner: Sarvesh Kumar Singh, A.A.G., Sunil Kumar Verma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ravi Kumar, A.C. to A.A.G, Raghwanand, GA. High Court of Judicature at Patna
14-06-2019 State Bank of India, West Bengal Versus Sunil Kumar Maity & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
03-06-2019 Sunil Ratnaparkhi & Another Versus Official Liquidator of M/a Satwik Electric Controls Pvt Ltd. High Court of Judicature at Bombay
29-05-2019 Sunil Bansal Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
15-05-2019 Jyoti Taide Versus Sunil Dambare & Another High Court of Chhattisgarh
10-05-2019 PT Purnanand Tiwari Intermediate College & Others Versus Sunil Kumar Agrawal & Others High Court of Uttarakhand
09-05-2019 Rachana Madan & Another Versus Sunil Madan High Court of Delhi
07-05-2019 Sunil Kumar Versus Presiding Officer Labour Court & Another High Court of Delhi
03-05-2019 Ratnem Vishnu Kamat @ Rukmabai Vishnu Kamat & Another Versus Roopali Sunil Lotlikar & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
02-05-2019 Vijay Mehra Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
01-05-2019 Maharashtra Archery Association Versus Rahul Mehra & Others Supreme Court of India
25-04-2019 Rathnayake Mudiyanselage Sunil Ratnayake Versus Hon. Attorney General, Attorney General's Department, Colombo 12 Supreme Court of Sri Lanka
25-04-2019 Rathnayake Mudiyanselage Sunil Ratnayake Versus Hon. Attorney General, Attorney General's Department, Colombo Supreme Court of Sri Lanka
25-04-2019 Rathnayake Mudiyanselage Sunil Ratnayake Versus Hon. Attorney General, Attorney General's Department, Colombo 12 Supreme Court of Sri Lanka
22-04-2019 Sunil Kumar Saxena Versus Export Inspection Council & Others High Court of Delhi
15-04-2019 Ashok Kumar Mehra & Another Versus The State of Punjab Supreme Court of India
11-04-2019 Sunil @ Papu Versus The State of Karnataka, Represented by its Secretary, Home Department & Others High Court of Karnataka
10-04-2019 Sunil & Others Versus State of Maharashtra In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
09-04-2019 Sunil Yadav Versus State of U.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
02-04-2019 Ashok Mehra Versus Enforcement Officer High Court of Punjab and Haryana
01-04-2019 The Employees Provident Fund Organisation & Another Versus B. Sunil Kumar & Others Supreme Court of India
29-03-2019 Sunil Kumar Biswas Versus Ordinance Factory Board & Others Supreme Court of India
28-03-2019 United India Insurance Co. Ltd. through its Divisional Manager and authorised representative and Signatory, Jalgaon Divisional Office Versus Sunil & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
26-03-2019 Dr. Sankar Kumar Mondal Versus Sunil Kumar Roy West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
20-03-2019 Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi Versus Sunil Lamba High Court of Delhi
12-03-2019 Sunil John Mathew Versus K.L. Lency & Others High Court of Kerala
11-03-2019 Sunil Versus State By CPI, Banahatti High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench At Dharwad
08-03-2019 MES No.243672 Shri Kh Sunil Singh Fitter, General Mechanic (High Skilled) & Others Versus The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to the Government of India & Another Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
07-03-2019 Sunil Versus The State of Maharashtra In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
06-03-2019 K. Sunil Kumar Versus D. Prasobha Devi & Another High Court of Kerala
27-02-2019 Sunder Lal Mehra Versus State of Madhya Pradesh High Court of Madhya Pradesh
27-02-2019 Sunil Kumar Gupta & Others Versus State of Uttar Pradesh & Others Supreme Court of India
19-02-2019 Shravan. A. Mehra & Another Versus Superintendent of Central Tax, Represented by the Authorised Officer & or Prosecutor Attached this Honble Court High Court of Karnataka
16-02-2019 Sunil Kumar Bande Versus Secretary to Government Education Department (Primary & Secondary Education) & Another High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench OF Kalaburagi
12-02-2019 BCH Electric Limited Versus Pradeep Mehra High Court of Delhi
11-02-2019 Sunil Kumar Versus Sambhu Singh High Court of Rajasthan