w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



State Bank of India v/s M/s Estraw Boards Manufacturing Co. Ltd.


Company & Directors' Information:- R K MANUFACTURING CO LTD [Active] CIN = L27209WB1984PLC037758

Company & Directors' Information:- R K MANUFACTURING CO LTD [Active] CIN = L27209GJ1984PLC098951

Company & Directors' Information:- INDIA MANUFACTURING CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24100DL2010PTC198947

Company & Directors' Information:- S I A MANUFACTURING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74120UP2013PTC057004

Company & Directors' Information:- S K M MANUFACTURING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17200DL2011PTC223768

Company & Directors' Information:- S T S MANUFACTURING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U28112TZ2006PTC012940

Company & Directors' Information:- A S P MANUFACTURING COMPANY PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27109WB1991PTC051461

Company & Directors' Information:- A-1 BOARDS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U20210MH2006PTC158764

Company & Directors' Information:- A K MANUFACTURING PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U51909MN1988PTC003110

Company & Directors' Information:- THE INDIA COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999TN1919PTC000911

Company & Directors' Information:- I T A C (INDIA) MANUFACTURING CO LTD [Dissolved] CIN = L51109WB1982PLC034689

Company & Directors' Information:- J D MANUFACTURING CO PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U51909WB1996PTC079825

Company & Directors' Information:- A S P MANUFACTURING COMPANY PVT LTD [Not available for efiling] CIN = U36900WB1991PTC005146

Company & Directors' Information:- B R D MANUFACTURING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51109WB1997PTC085188

Company & Directors' Information:- R J S MANUFACTURING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27104DL1997PTC090521

Company & Directors' Information:- B U MANUFACTURING PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U51109WB1982PTC035271

Company & Directors' Information:- M M MANUFACTURING PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U26922WB1993PTC059837

Company & Directors' Information:- J. C. MANUFACTURING INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U21099WB2020PTC236821

Company & Directors' Information:- BOARDS AND BOARDS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U21012RJ1974PTC001587

Company & Directors' Information:- S B MANUFACTURING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U31506WB1999PTC088567

Company & Directors' Information:- K. V. J. MANUFACTURING INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29308DL2017PTC320213

Company & Directors' Information:- A T E MANUFACTURING CO PRIVATE LIMITED [Amalgamated] CIN = U28999GJ1973PTC002296

Company & Directors' Information:- A P BOARDS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U21016HR2002PTC035003

Company & Directors' Information:- INDIA CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65990MH1941PTC003461

Company & Directors' Information:- J P MANUFACTURING AND CO PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U51226WB1982PTC034927

Company & Directors' Information:- D. K. MANUFACTURING (INDIA) LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U37200WB2011PLC170403

Company & Directors' Information:- S M MANUFACTURING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U34300HR1997PTC057824

Company & Directors' Information:- G K MANUFACTURING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U34300PB2012PTC036073

Company & Directors' Information:- P & B MANUFACTURING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29254TN2010PTC076696

Company & Directors' Information:- B. V. H. MANUFACTURING INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999GJ2018FTC100633

Company & Directors' Information:- R A MANUFACTURING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U36900HR2012PTC047669

Company & Directors' Information:- A K R MANUFACTURING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U19200RJ2012PTC041177

Company & Directors' Information:- C N C MANUFACTURING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U64204DL2015PTC281449

    S.C.C. Revision Defective No. 140 of 2016

    Decided On, 22 June 2016

    At, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAM SURAT RAM (MAURYA)

    For the Appellant: Pradeep Kumar Tripathi, Advocate. For the Respondent:-----.



Judgment Text

1. Heard Sri. P.K. Tripathi for the revisionists and Sri Ashish Kumar Singh for the respondents.

2. This revision has been filed against the order of Additional District Judge/Judge, Small Causes, dated 21.5.2016 by which he has directed for attachment of properties of revisionists for realisation of amount of Rs.29,39,205.94.

3. The revisionists are tenants in the premises belonging to the respondents. The respondents filed an application (registered as Case No.1 of 1987) under Section 21(8) of U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act,1972 before the Rent Control and Eviction Officer, Saharanpur for enhancement of rent. The application was contested by the revisionists. After hearing the parties the Rent Control and Eviction Officer by order dated 25.1.2010 enhanced the rent at the rate of Rs.4035/- per month from March, 1999. The revisionists challenged the aforesaid order in appeal (registered as Rent Control Appeal No.4 of 2010). The respondents also filed an appeal against the aforesaid order(registered as Rent Control Appeal No.5 of 2010). Both the appeals were consolidated and heard by Additional District Judge, Court No.2, Saharanpur, who by order dated 15.3.2012 dismissed Rent Control Appeal No.5 of 2010 and partly allowed Rent Control Appeal No.4 of 2010. The appellate court has also quantified the arrears of rent to the tune of Rs.17,56,716.30. Apart from payment of the aforesaid amount, the court has also directed the revisionists to pay house tax and water tax to the Nagar Nigam and if payment of the aforesaid amount is not made within thirty days from the date of order then interest at the rate of 9% per annum is also awarded. The revisionists challenged the aforesaid order in Writ Petition No.23978 of 2012 but no interim order has been granted to the revisionists.

4. The respondents filed an execution application (registered as Execution Case No.41 of 2012) for execution of the appellate court decree dated 15.3.2012 before District Judge/Judge, Small Causes, Saharanpur. In this case the revisionists appeared and filed their objection. Apart from their other objections, the revisionists have raised an objection that the court has no jurisdiction to hear the execution case. After hearing the parties the court, by order dated 2.1.2016 has issued recovery certificate on the prescribed proforma. In spite of issuance of recovery certificate, the revisionists neither paid the amount to the respondents nor deposited it in the court. Therefore, another application i.e. Execution Case No.15 of 2016 was filed. By the impugned order dated 21.5.2016, the court has directed for attachment of the properties of the revisionists. Hence, this revision has been filed.

5. The counsel for the revisionists submits that Additional District Judge, Court no.3, Saharanpur has not been assigned jurisdiction of Judge, Small Causes. Thus, execution proceeding filed before him was not maintainable and the order passed in this respect is illegal and without jurisdiction. He also submits that the order, which is sought to be executed is still sub judice before this Court as such realisation of amount is not proper.

6. I have considered the arguments of the counsel for the parties.

7. Under Section 6 of Provincial Small Cause Court Act, 1887(hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), Judges are appointed for exercising jurisdiction of Small Causes within the specified territory and under Section 8 of the Act , Additional Judges are also appointed by the State Government. State Government by Notification published in U.P. Gazette, Part 1, dated 7.10.72, page 5973 has delegated its power to High Court of Judicature at Allahabad for appointment of Judge, Small Causes Court. In continuation to the aforesaid notification, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad by notification published in U.P. Gazette, dated 11.11.1972, page 3758 has conferred jurisdiction of Judge, Small Causes, upon all the District Judges and Additional District Judges. Thus, argument that Additional District Judge, Court No.3, Saharanpur has not been assigned jurisdiction of Judge, Small Causes, is not liable to be accepted. In ground no.3 it has been mentioned that Execution Case No.41 of 2012 was filed before the District Judge and it was transferred to the court of Additional District Judge, Court No.3, Saharanpur by order dated 2.1.2016 where recovery certificate was issued. Subsequent application has been registered as Execution Case No.15 of 2016 before Additional District Judge, Court No.3, Saharanpur.

8. By virtue of Section 17 of the Act, the procedures provided in CPC shall save in so far as is otherwise provided, have been applied. In view of

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

Section 38, CPC, the court, which passed the decree or the court to which decree has been transferred can execute the decree. In this case, the case has been transferred to the Additional District Judge, Court No.3, Saharanpur, who is competent to execute the decree. It is admitted that in the writ petition filed by the revisionists, no interim order has been granted. Thus, execution proceeding cannot be withheld. 9. In view of the aforesaid discussion, the revision has no merit and it is dismissed.
O R