w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Sony India Pvt. Ltd. Mohan Co Operative Industrial Estate, New Delhi & Others v/s Jose George


Company & Directors' Information:- SONY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1994PTC062781

Company & Directors' Information:- TO THE NEW PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72900DL2006PTC235208

Company & Directors' Information:- CO-OPERATIVE COMPANY LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51226DL1910PLC299886

Company & Directors' Information:- CO-OPERATIVE COMPANY LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51226UP1910PLC000093

Company & Directors' Information:- V. K. INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27100MH2004PLC149538

Company & Directors' Information:- R K INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29300PB1996PLC017836

Company & Directors' Information:- V T INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74990TN2010PLC078041

Company & Directors' Information:- A L W ESTATE PRIVATE LTD [Active] CIN = U70101WB1993PTC057397

Company & Directors' Information:- S L H ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45201DL2005PTC140123

Company & Directors' Information:- SONY ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45200MH2004PTC146712

Company & Directors' Information:- B P INDUSTRIAL CORPN. PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U15312UP1973PTC087037

Company & Directors' Information:- S K G ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45201DL2005PTC140647

Company & Directors' Information:- THE NEW INDIA INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72100DL1950PLC001757

Company & Directors' Information:- A V A INDUSTRIAL CORPN PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29191TZ1956PTC000261

Company & Directors' Information:- MOHAN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U70101DL2010PTC207186

Company & Directors' Information:- MOHAN MOHAN & CO PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U60200BR1951PTC000497

Company & Directors' Information:- M S ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45202MH1998PTC117103

Company & Directors' Information:- N J JOSE AND CO PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U55101KL1979PTC003037

Company & Directors' Information:- THE INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15420MH1921PTC000947

Company & Directors' Information:- S SONY AND CO PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U74899DL1981PTC011522

Company & Directors' Information:- V M ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U70101DL1996PTC079469

Company & Directors' Information:- B M P ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U45200DL2006PTC156493

Company & Directors' Information:- K N F ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45202PN2006PTC129684

Company & Directors' Information:- R AND R MOHAN INDIA PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U74899DL1961PTC003426

Company & Directors' Information:- D D INDUSTRIAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U34102DL2006PTC156978

Company & Directors' Information:- OPERATIVE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74300KA2008FTC048079

Company & Directors' Information:- A V GEORGE AND CO PRIVATE LTD [Active] CIN = U51109KL1937PTC000027

Company & Directors' Information:- G K S ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U70102TN2007PTC063818

Company & Directors' Information:- J R ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45201DL1994PTC058595

Company & Directors' Information:- G P ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45201GJ1987PTC009746

Company & Directors' Information:- K MOHAN (INDIA ) PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U63090DL1987PTC027404

Company & Directors' Information:- P. C. ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45203MH2003PTC141842

Company & Directors' Information:- B L AND CO NEW DELHI PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1968PTC004910

Company & Directors' Information:- A K INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29130PN2014PTC151053

Company & Directors' Information:- S B ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45200MH2003PTC142450

Company & Directors' Information:- K L G ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U70101DL2005PTC141271

Company & Directors' Information:- C L C ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U70109HR2009PTC039162

Company & Directors' Information:- A V GEORGE AND CO INDIA PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U74999KL1946PTC001390

Company & Directors' Information:- NEW INDIA CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U36999TN1940PTC001776

    First Appeal No. 580 of 2016

    Decided On, 01 July 2020

    At, Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. T.S.P. MOOSATH
    By, JUDICIAL MEMBER
    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. R. RANJIT
    By, MEMBER & THE HONOURABLE MRS. A. BEENA KUMARI
    By, MEMBER

    For the Appellants: R. Chandrapraveen, Advocate. For the Respondent: R. Suja Madhav, Advocate.



Judgment Text


A. Beena Kumari, Member

The appellants are the opposite parties in C.C. No. 131/2015 on the file of Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Malappuram (hereinafter referred to as the District Forum for short). The respondent is the complainant. The dispute is regarding the defect of the T.V. The District Forum allowed the complaint and directed the opposite parties to refund Rs. 38,000/-, the price of the T.V and to pay Rs. 10,000/- as compensation and Rs. 10,000/- as costs. Aggrieved by this order the opposite parties have filed this appeal.

2. Brief facts of the case are as follows: The complainant had purchased a Sony Television from the 1st opposite party which was manufactured by the 3rd opposite party on 09.12.2009 for Rs. 38,000/-. On 03.07.2010 an abnormal display was found to the TV and serviceman tried to repair the same, but they failed in their effort. At last, after a long effort the problem was solved. On 02.06.2013 the same defect again found and 1st opposite party directed the complainant to entrust the TV to their authorized service centre at Perinthalmanna and an amount of Rs. 11,374/- was paid as repair charge. Though it was repaired the problem repeated again and again and the 2nd opposite party made him believe that they will solve the problem, and as instructed by them an amount of Rs. 11,361/- was paid by the complainant by way of DD to the 2nd opposite party. Thereafter 2nd opposite party informed the complainant that the spare parts are not available and the complainant enquired about the payment of Rs. 11,361/-, and he was told that he had to wait for 7 days to return the said amount since the D.D had been sent to 3rd opposite party. Thereafter they suggested an offer that if the complainant is purchasing a new Sony Television, they will provide a discount of 5% towards maximum retail price and for that he has to return the damaged one. Since the complainant was not amenable to that he demanded the money which was already paid by him. After repeated demand the complainant was directed to come and collect the amount from the office of the 2nd opposite party. Thus the complainant collected the amount and at that time also the 2nd opposite party offered 7% discount for the television. They were not ready to repair the TV and they compelled the complainant to purchase a new one. The complainant had purchased the above branded TV by seeing the attractive and misleading advertisements. But the acts and omission on the part of the opposite parties caused this complaint.

3. Opposite parties 1 & 2 set ex-parte. 3rd opposite party filed version. The purchase of the TV was admitted. It was holding one year warranty. After enjoying the TV for a period of 4 years the complainant approached the opposite party for repairing the same. Since it was already in out of warranty, an amount of Rs. 11,379/- was received by them and it was repaired. Second time also the complainant entrusted the TV for repair. Since it was out of its warranty an estimate was provided by the opposite party and the complainant was not ready to approve the same. As a goodwill gesture, the opposite party offered the complainant to exchange the TV with another model by paying 75% of the actual price i.e; at a discount of 25% on M.R.P. The complainant refused the offer. As it is an electronic goods the natural fail may happen in the product in the course of time and this is the reason that the opposite party offered one year warranty and beyond the period, the service becomes chargeable. So no deficiency in service committed by opposite party and the complaint is to be dismissed with cost.

4. In this case the complainant has filed chief affidavit and Exts. A1 to A5 were marked on his side. Ext. A1 is the warranty card. Ext. A2 is the bill issued by the 1st opposite party dated 09.12.2009 for Rs. 38,000/-. Ext. A3 is the proforma invoice. Ext. A4 is the job sheet dated 02.02.2015. Ext. A5 is the copy of the D.D issued by the complainant to the 3rd opposite party by way of repairing charge. 3rd opposite party also filed chief affidavit and produced the warranty card. The 3rd opposite party admitted the documents produced by the complainant. According to them the complainant had enjoyed the T.V for 4 years and as it is out of warranty repair charge was received from the complainant.

5. The complainant stated that within six months of purchase of the TV, there were some defects. But the complainant had failed to prove that contention. The District Forum found that the charging of Rs. 11,361/- as repairing charge by the opposite parties from the complainant itself is their deficiency in service.

6. On the basis of the evidence adduced by the complainant the District Forum allowed the complaint and directed the opposite parties to pay Rs. 38,000/- as the price of the T.V set and also directed to pay Rs. 10,000/- as compensation for the mental agony suffered by the complainant and also to pay Rs. 10,000/- as costs of the proceedings to the complainant. Against this order the opposite parties have filed this appeal.

7. We heard both sides and verified the entire records. There was no dispute regarding Exts. A1 and A2. As per Ext. A2 the date of purchase is 09.12.2009. As per Ext. A1 the service warranty provides upto 21.11.2010. As per Ext. A3 the first repair was done on 26.06.2013, i.e; out of warranty period. Thereafter the complainant used the T.V till 02.02.2015 without any defects, ie; for more than 2 years. Ext. A4 shows that the complainant approached the opposite parties for repairing the T.V. on 02.02.2015 and they charged Rs. 11,361/- from the complainant. But the complainant was not satisfied with the work of the opposite parties and demanded for refund of the repairing charge which he had paid. The opposite parties refunded the amount to the complainant. The opposite parties advised the complainant to purchase a new Sony television, by offering 25% discount towards maximum retail price. But the complainant was not amenable for that offer.

8. In this case the complainant has not proved the manufacturing defect of the T.V. The complainant has been using the T.V without any problem for more than 4 years. The defects occurred after the warranty period hence the repair will be only on payment basis. Since the complainant has been using the T.V without any problem for more than 4 years, he is not entitled to get the total price of the T.V. The District Forum ought to have deducted the depreciation of the T.V. Moreover the defects were found only after the warranty period. There is no evidenc

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

e before us to prove that the T.V set is repairable or not. 9. In these circumstances, we decide to modify the order of the District Forum. In the result, the appeal is partly allowed and the order passed by the District Forum, Malappuram in C.C. No. 131/2015 is modified as follows: The appellants/opposite parties are directed to pay Rs. 15,000/- to the respondent/complainant. The respondent/complainant is permitted to obtain release of the amount of Rs. 15,000/- from the statutory amount deposited by the appellant at the time of institution of the appeal before this Commission, on proper application. The appellants/opposite parties can withdraw the balance amount, on proper application. No order of costs.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

06-10-2020 Rikhab Jain Versus M/S. Trackon Couriers Private Limited, New Delhi & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
05-10-2020 T.K. David Versus Kuruppampady Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. & Others Supreme Court of India
05-10-2020 Tarun Kanti Chowdhury & Others Versus Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
01-10-2020 Ujwala Prasad & Others Versus New India Assurance Company Ltd., Rep. by Division Manager & Others High Court of Karnataka
01-10-2020 Ujwala Prasad & Others Versus New India Assurance Company Ltd., Rep. by Division Manager & Others High Court of Karnataka
01-10-2020 Bayer New Zealand Limited Versus Ministry For Primary Industries Court of Appeal of New Zealand
01-10-2020 M. Meenachi Muppidathi Versus The Government of India, Representing by The Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi & Another Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
01-10-2020 M. Meenachi Muppidathi Versus The Government of India, Representing by The Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi & Another Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
01-10-2020 R. Krishnaraj Versus The Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Cuddalore & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-10-2020 Construction Industry Development Council, New Delhi Versus Arjun Singh & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
01-10-2020 M/s. Harihar Buildspace Pvt. Ltd. G-III, Amar Palace, Panchsheel Square, Dhantoli, Nagpur Versus Union of India Through its Chief Secretary, Ministry of Power, Shramshakti Bhavan, New Delhi & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
30-09-2020 Lalatendu Nayak & Another Versus Supertech Ltd., New Delhi National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
30-09-2020 Pavai Varam Educational Trust, Established & Namakkal Represented by Chairman, V. Natarajan Versus The Pharmacy Council of India, Represented by the Secretary Cum Registrar, New Delhi High Court of Judicature at Madras
30-09-2020 M/s. Taneja Developers & Infrastructure Ltd., New Delhi Versus Col. B.S. Goraya National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
25-09-2020 Rhonpal Biotech Pvt. Ltd. Versus New Delhi Municipal Council & Others High Court of Delhi
24-09-2020 Mohan Versus State of Madhya Pradesh Supreme Court of India
23-09-2020 C.M. Gadha & Another Versus Bar Council of India, New Delhi, Rep. by Its Secretary & Others High Court of Kerala
22-09-2020 Bhilai Engineering Corporation Ltd., Through Madhavdas K., Authorised Signatory Bec Nandinin Road Industrial Area, Chhattisgarh Versus United India Insurance Company Ltd. Through Senior Divisional Manager, Chhattisgarh National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
22-09-2020 The Visnagar Taluka Co-Operative Purchase & Sales Union Limited (Deleted) Versus District Registrar, Co-Op. Societies High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
21-09-2020 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Versus & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
21-09-2020 Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi Versus M/s. Guptasons Jewellers & Gems Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
21-09-2020 Tvl. Transtonnelstroy Afcons Joint Venture, Represented by its Authorised Signatory, Chennai Versus Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
21-09-2020 New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Represented by its Divisional Manager Versus Shanthamma & Another High Court of Karnataka
18-09-2020 Subanamma Ninan & Others Versus George Veeran High Court of Kerala
18-09-2020 Aaraf Khan & Another Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh, Through Police Station Industrial Area, Ratlam High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Indore
17-09-2020 M/s. MSD Real Estate LLP Versus The Collector of Stamps & Another Supreme Court of India
17-09-2020 Advocate Thoufeek Ahamed Versus Union of India, Represented by Secretary (Justice), Ministry of Law & Justice, New Delhi & Another High Court of Kerala
17-09-2020 Katherine Anne Starr Phillips Versus New Zealand Police Court of Appeal of New Zealand
15-09-2020 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Represented by its Manager Versus Girija & Another High Court of Karnataka
15-09-2020 United India Insurance Company Ltd., Through The Regional Manager, New Delhi Versus Dinesh Vijay National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
14-09-2020 Tuticorin Stevedores' Association, Rep.by its Secretary, Tuticorin Versus The Government of India, Rep.by its Secretary, Ministry of Shipping, New Delhi & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
14-09-2020 Dr. Varghese Perayil Versus The Election Commission of India, New Delhi, Rep. by Its Secretary & Others High Court of Kerala
14-09-2020 Tamil Nadu Atomic Power Employees Union (A Government of India Enterprise), Rep.by its President, Kanchipuram Versus Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd., (A Government of India Enterprise), Rep.by its Senior Manager(Personal & Industrial Relations), Madras Atomic Power Station, Kanchipuram High Court of Judicature at Madras
11-09-2020 George Thomas Kuruvilla & Others Versus State of Goa through Calangute Police Station, Calangute, Bardez, Goa & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
11-09-2020 Nagpur Integrated Township Pvt. Ltd. & Another Versus Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Mumbai & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
10-09-2020 Raina Begum Versus The Union of India Rep. By The Comm & Secy. to The Govt. of India, Home Deptt., New Delhi-01, India & Others High Court of Gauhati
09-09-2020 Oriental College of Teacher Education, Represented by Its Manager, Calicut Versus The Regional Director, National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi High Court of Kerala
08-09-2020 S. Jagannatha Rao Versus Air India Limited, Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
08-09-2020 The Dental Council of India, Aiwan-E-Galib Marg, New Delhi Versus PSR Lakhmi Bhuvaneshwari Preethi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
08-09-2020 The Branch Manager, The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Karaikudi Versus Rani & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
07-09-2020 Badri Narayan Singh & Another Versus The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) Government of India, through the Home Secretary North Block, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Patna
07-09-2020 The New India Assurance Company Limited Versus Somwati & Others Supreme Court of India
07-09-2020 District Co-Operative Bank Ltd. Durga Branch, Varanasi, Through Its Branch Manager & Another Versus Leelawati Devi & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
03-09-2020 B. Rajesh & Another Versus Union of India, Rep. by its Ministry of Corporate Affairs, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-09-2020 Hyundai Motor India Ltd., New Delhi Versus Harshad Ramji Chauhan & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
01-09-2020 M/s Elgi Equipments Ltd., Rep.by its company Secretary, S. Raveendar, Coimbatore Versus M/s Kurichi New Town Development Authority Rep.by its Member Secretary, Kurichi, Coimbatore & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-09-2020 Pavai Varam Educational Trust Established and Administering, Paavai College of Pharmacy and Research, Rep. by Chairman V. Natarajan Versus The Pharmacy Council of India, Represented by the Secretary cum Registrar, New Delhi High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-09-2020 M. Mangalasamy Versus The Registrar of Co-operative Societies (Housing), Nandanam, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
31-08-2020 New Negendra Lorry Transport Versus M/s. Telangana Foods a Government of Telangana Enterprises & Another High Court of for the State of Telangana
31-08-2020 M/s. Omaxe Limited, New Delhi & Another Versus Divya Karun & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
28-08-2020 M/s Urban Systems Versus The Union of India Rep. By The Secretary To The Govt of India, Min of Finance, Deptt of Revenue Central Board of Indirect Taxes And Customs, North Block, New Delhi & Others High Court of Gauhati
28-08-2020 Inter Gold India Pvt. Ltd., Maharashtra & Another Versus New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Maharashtra National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
27-08-2020 Shriram General Insurance Co.Ltd., E.B.RIICO Industrial Area, Rajasthan Versus Chinnaraj & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
26-08-2020 Davinder Nath Sethi & Another Versus M/s. Purearth Infrastructure Limited, New Delhi National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
26-08-2020 Karvy Stock Broking Limited, Represented by its Vicepresident (Legal) Ch. Viswanath Versus The Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, New Delhi & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
26-08-2020 New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Delhi Versus Maninderjeet Singh Khera National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
26-08-2020 State of Kerala, Represented by The Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram & Others Versus Laly George High Court of Kerala
25-08-2020 Gopal Krishna Mishra Versus State of Chhattisgarh through The Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare Development, Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
25-08-2020 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Branch Office, Villupuram Versus J. Manimaran & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
24-08-2020 R.K. Dawra Versus Union of India, Through Secretary Ministry of Communication, Department of Telecommunication, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh Bench
24-08-2020 Sanjay Nayyar Versus State of NCT Delhi, New Delhi & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
24-08-2020 United India Insurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi Versus Singhla Engineers & Contractors Pvt. Ltd. & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
21-08-2020 Bindu George Versus Manager, Aquinas College Edacochin High Court of Kerala
21-08-2020 Pankaj Chaudhary, HCS, Special Secretary, Public Health Engineer Department Versus Union of India, through its Secretary, Department of Personnel & Training, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh Bench
21-08-2020 Dr. Parimal Roy, Working as Director, Indian Council of Agricultural Research NIVEDI Versus The President, Indian Council of Agricultural Research Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Bangalore Bench
19-08-2020 Babubhai Bhagvanji Tandel Versus New India Assurance Company Ltd., Maharashtra National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
19-08-2020 Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., New Delhi Versus Adv. Shiji Joseph & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
19-08-2020 V.K. Somarajan Pillai Versus Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to Govt. of India, Department of Posts, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Ernakulam Bench
19-08-2020 Vijay Cotton & Fibre Co., Maharashtra Versus New India Insurance Company Ltd., Maharashtra & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
19-08-2020 George Elamplakkadu@Vakkachan Powathil Versus A.V. Mathew@Samkutty Vettupalam & Others High Court of Kerala
18-08-2020 Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi Versus Astha Cement Pvt. Ltd. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-08-2020 Sri Nandhanam Educational & Social Welfare Trust Vellore District rep. by its Chairman, P.M.N. Mohan Krishnaa Versus The Reserve Bank of India, rep. by its General Manager, Banking Ombudsman, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
18-08-2020 The Registrar (Judicial), High Court of Judicature of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad Versus The Union of India, The Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
17-08-2020 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Chhattisgarh & Another Versus Astu Ram & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
17-08-2020 New India Assurance Company Ltd., New Delhi Versus Shailendra Prasad Singh National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
14-08-2020 T.V. Maniyappan & Another Versus Pattanakkad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Rep. by Its Secretary & Others High Court of Kerala
14-08-2020 Kasmikoya Biyyammabiyoda & Others Versus Union of India, Represented by Home Secretary, Secretariat, Government of India, New Delhi & Others High Court of Kerala
13-08-2020 Brahmaputra Infrastructure Ltd, New Delhi & Another Versus State of Bihar & Another High Court of Judicature at Patna
13-08-2020 The Secretary to the Government, Department of Education Fort St. George, Chennai & Others Versus P. Dhanapackiathai & Another Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
12-08-2020 Abdul Saleem Pattakal & Another Versus The Director General Bureau of Civil Aviation Security, A-Wing, New Delhi & Others High Court of Kerala
12-08-2020 Scott Christian College, Rep.by its Correspondent S. Byju Nizeth Paaul Versus The Member Secretary, All India Council for Technical Education, New Delhi & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
12-08-2020 Krishnamoorthy & Another Versus Chengalvarayan Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd., Periyasevalai, Rep. by its Special Officer & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
10-08-2020 Malvinder Mohan Singh Versus State of NCT of Delhi & Another High Court of Delhi
10-08-2020 Maranalloor Milk Producers Co. Operative Society Ltd. Represented by Its Secretary, Thiruvananthapuram & Others Versus The Registrar /Director, Directorate of Dairy Development, Pattom & Others High Court of Kerala
10-08-2020 Vipin K. Hari & Another Versus The Joint Registrar of Co-Operative Societies (General), Thrissur & Others High Court of Kerala
10-08-2020 Sri Kalakuteers Apartment Flat Owners Maintenance Mutually Aided Co-operative Society Limited, rep. by its Chief Promoter & Another Versus The State of Telangana, rep. by its Prl. Secretary Cooperation Dept., Secretariat, Hyd. & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
07-08-2020 Citibank N.A., New Delhi Versus Deepanshu Kumar & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
07-08-2020 The Commissioner of Income Tax-V, New Delhi Versus M/s. Nalwa Investment Ltd. & Others High Court of Delhi
07-08-2020 M/s. B & B Growing, New Delhi & Another Versus Capital Co-Op. Group Housing Society Ltd., Delhi & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
07-08-2020 Surender Singh Dahiya, Additional Director, Agriculture Department, Government of Haryana (Panchkula) Versus Union of India, through Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions, Department of Personnel & Training, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh Bench
06-08-2020 Rajiv Bal Versus Harrison Industries, New Delhi & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
06-08-2020 The Branch Manager, M/s Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Kodungallur Versus M.M. Jose Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
06-08-2020 Peter & Others Versus Union of India, Represented by Its Secretary, Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change, New Delhi & Others High Court of Kerala
06-08-2020 New India Assurance Company Ltd., Divisional Office, Kottayam, Rep. by The Manager Versus O.S. Varghese & Others High Court of Kerala
05-08-2020 Liju Jose & Another Versus Anto P. Ignatious & Another High Court of Kerala
04-08-2020 P. Anil Kumar @ Chempazhanthi Anil & Others Versus The Indian Red Cross Society, Represented by Its Secretary General, National IRCS, New Delhi & Others High Court of Kerala
04-08-2020 M/s. Pioneer Power Ltd, Rep. by its Chief General Manager, Therkukattur Village, Ramanathapuram Versus Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, New Delhi & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
04-08-2020 Alangudi Village Panchayat, Rep. by its President, A.M. Mohan Versus The Secretary to Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Department of HR & CE, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-08-2020 The Managing Committee, (Under Order of Suspension), The Vellathooval Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Represented by Its President Versus The Joint Registrar of Co-Operative Societies (General), Office of The Joint Registrar of Co-Operative Societies (General), Idukki & Others High Court of Kerala
04-08-2020 Union of India, Rep by its Secretary to the Government, Department of Home Affairs, New Delhi & Others Versus Siva Lakshmi High Court of Judicature at Madras