w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Singhal Udyog & Others v/s Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-1 & Others


Company & Directors' Information:- SINGHAL CORPORATION LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999DL1984PLC018468

Company & Directors' Information:- SINGHAL AND CO PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U50101PB1981PTC004379

Company & Directors' Information:- DELHI UDYOG CORPN PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U63090DL1959PTC003025

    CEAC. Nos. 23 to 30, 19 to 22 of 2018 & CM. Appl. Nos. 26747-26748, 26753-26754, 26788-26789, 26790-26791, 26797-26798, 26799-26800, 26802-26803, 26866-26867, 26530-26531, 26532-26533, 26534-26535, 26559-26560 of 2018

    Decided On, 10 July 2018

    At, High Court of Delhi

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. TEJI

    For the Appearing Parties: Rajesh Rawal, Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel, Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel, Abhishek Ghai, Amit Bansal, Akhil Kulshrestha, Advocates.



Judgment Text

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.

Oral:

1. The question of law urged in these appeals under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 by the assessees/appellants is with respect to the tenability of invocation of the extended period of limitation, enacted by the proviso to Section 11 of the Central Excise Act. The appellants urge that having regard to the totality of facts and circumstances, the findings arrived at by the Adjudicating and Appellate Authority, and later affirmed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), are wholly erroneous.

2. All the appellants manufacture stainless steel strips which are excisable. According to the plea, they claim to have availed the facility of a compounding scheme and deposited the excise duty leviable in accordance with the provisions of the Act and Notifications, in terms of the required form (Appendix II). All the appellants, have their own units located in Wazirpur Industrial Area. The Commissioner of Central Excise, by identically phrased show-cause notices issued in March 2009, called upon the assessees to show cause as to why duty and appropriate penalty ought not to be levied on the allegations that the compounding scheme and the benefit of lower duty was availed without depositing the amounts. The show-cause notice alleged that contrary to the assessees’ claims, the documents relied upon by them – principally in the form of the duly stamped bank receipts evidencing payment of the bank amounts, were forged. The assessees replied arguing that they were victims of a fraud and not its perpetrators, since the amounts appear to have been misappropriated even though paid by them. It is not disputed that the amounts were not debited from the assessees’ bank accounts; rather, they claim that these amounts were periodically deposited in cash with the bank. The Adjudicatory Authority - and later the Appellate Authority rendered concurrent findings of fact rejecting the assessees’ explanations and confirming the duty payable for the extended period. In addition, penalty was imposed. In these circumstances, the assessees approached the CESTAT which vide the impugned order rejected all their appeals through a common order.

3. It is argued on behalf of the assessees that the invocation of the extended period in the given facts and circumstances of the case was patently erroneous. Learned counsel emphasized that there is no positive finding rendered by any of the authorities below which says that the assessees were parties to the fraud. It was submitted that in the absence of such a finding, the invocation of the extended period which is premised upon short levy or short payment, on grounds of 'fraud or collusion or any wilful representation or suppression of facts', necessarily means that there ought to be an active participation by the individual, against whom such notice is issued. It is claimed that the assessees’ consistent case or rather plea was that the First Information Report (FIR) was in fact, lodged by them upon immediately becoming aware that the amounts were not deposited with the bank. Given these facts and the pendency of criminal investigation, it could not be urged much less found that they were perpetrators of the fraud justifying the invocation of an extended period. Learned counsel relied upon the authority of the Punjab and Haryana High Court decision in Commissioner of Customs, Amritsar v. Vallabh Design Products 2007 (219) E.L.T. 73 (P&H). It is evident from a facial analysis that the Commissioner, Customs, being the Adjudicatory Authority, had concluded that the assessee in that case was not party to the fraud but rather was a subsequent purchaser of the forged instrument (DEPB licence). Learned counsel also relied upon Pee Jay International v. Commissioner of Customs 2016 (340) E.L.T. 625 (P&H). The Revenue relies upon the Supreme Court decision in Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) v. Aafloat Textiles (I) Pvt. Ltd. 2009 (235) E.L.T. 587 (S.C.) and the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Golden Tools International v. Joint DGFT, Ludhiana 2006 (199) E.L.T. 213 (P&H) which was apparently affirmed in Golden Tools International v. Joint DGFT, Ludhiana 2013 (293) E.L.T. A57 (SC) by the Supreme Court. It was urged that the appellants were given every opportunity to establish that they were innocent parties but made no attempt to present acceptable evidence.

4. This Court is of the opinion that the concurrent findings of fact rendered in this case, were in order, given the circumstances which appear on the record. All the appellants stated in their defence that they had tasked one or the other individual to deposit the duty amounts with the concerned bank periodically. The least that could have been done by them in these circumstances, was to establish through some credible material i.e. by summoning the bank records or citing the concerned individuals as witnesses and ensuring that their statements were recorded. The assessees however, chose to baldly assert that they were victims of fraud and that the First Information Report was in fact lodged against a certain individual, one Sachin, against whom investigations are ongoing.

5. The judgment in Aafloat (supra) states that if one takes advantage of a set of circumstances which turns out to be based upon fraud, he or it has to suffer the consequences. The Court then was dealing with a situation of importation of gold under forged Special Import License (SIL). The decision is contrary to the Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment in Vallabh Design Products (supra) (which the appellants rely upon). Consequently, the Supreme Court decision has to prevail. Even otherwise, there is no denial of the fact that the appellants availed of and sought to take adva

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

ntage of the fraudulent documents, which they pleaded to be genuine, even though the amounts in fact were never deposited. The reliance on Pee Jay International (supra) by the appellant’s counsel is insubstantial. The broad manner of construing the ratio in Aafloat (supra) necessarily is that one who takes advantage of fraudulent act has to suffer the consequences. We, therefore, do not agree with the view of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Having regard to these facts, the invocation of the extended period was justified. There is no error in the findings of the lower authorities. The appeals are consequently dismissed.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

28-08-2020 R.K. Singhal Versus M/s. Sudradh Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Director, Shri Laxmichand Damji Chheda, Mumbai National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
26-06-2020 Mohd. Inam Versus Sanjay Kumar Singhal & Others Supreme Court of India
20-04-2020 Anuj Singhal & Another Versus State of U.P. & Another High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
26-02-2020 Loveleen Gupta & Another Versus Ram Pratap Singhal & Others High Court of Delhi
17-02-2020 Union of India, Represented by The Secretary to Government, M/o.Commerce & Industry, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, Udyog Bhavan, New Delhi & Others Versus Rema Srinivasan Iyengar, Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks & GI, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
07-02-2020 Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. (Earlier Known As Maruti Udyog Ltd.) Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi Supreme Court of India
29-01-2020 Sanjay Singhal & Another Versus North Goa Planning & Development Authority, Through its Member Secretary & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
10-01-2020 Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. Versus Preeti Singhal National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
10-12-2019 Hemant Kumar Singhal Versus Indian Overseas Bank & Another High Court of Delhi
05-08-2019 R. Deekshita Versus The Directorate General of Health Services, Health and Family Welfare Department Near Udyog Bhawan Metro Station, New Delhi & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
30-05-2019 Ambika Vikas Udyog Versus Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Delhi Zonal Unit & Another High Court of Delhi
24-05-2019 Kanhaiya Singhal Versus India-bulls Housing Finance Limited & Others Competition Commission of India
25-04-2019 Manish Kumar Versus Indu Singhal High Court of Rajasthan Jodhpur Bench
13-04-2019 Jai Prakash Versus Anoop Singhal High Court of Delhi
07-02-2019 Shiv Kumar Agarwal Former Director M/s. Moongipa Investments Limited R/o Ansal Sushant City & Others Versus Lal Chand Singhal & Others National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
01-02-2019 Ritu Kamal Singhal, Mumbai Versus Ito 24(3)(4), Mumbai Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Mumbai
18-01-2019 Aura Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd Versus Rajesh Kumar Singhal National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
04-12-2018 Amit Kumar Singhal & Others Versus M/s Kohinoor Plywoods Pvt Ltd & Another High Court of Gauhati
13-11-2018 Suresh Kumar Singhal Versus Union of India High Court of Rajasthan
16-10-2018 Shankar Lal Versus Rajinder Singhal & Others High Court of Delhi
09-10-2018 Dr. Ashok Singhal Versus Dr. Inder Kumar Gupta & Others High Court of Delhi
27-09-2018 Rajeev Singhal & Another Versus MCD (East Delhi Municipal Corporation) & Another High Court of Delhi
17-09-2018 United Bleachers Limited, Mettupalayam Versus The Additional Development Commissioner for Handlooms, Ministry of Textiles, Government of India, Udyog Bhavan, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
18-07-2018 J R Singhal Versus Kameshwar Das Atri & Others High Court of Delhi
13-07-2018 Rajesh Verma Versus Suraj Prakash Singhal High Court of Delhi
13-07-2018 Puneet Prakash Versus Suresh Kumar Singhal & Another High Court of Delhi
11-07-2018 International Commerce Limited Versus Government of India, Ministry of Steel, through its Secretary Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
06-06-2018 Ramesh Singhal Versus United Bank of India & Another High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
15-05-2018 M/s. Singhal Automobiles Versus Chandreshwar Tiwari Uttarakhand State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dehradun
14-05-2018 Seema Dhatu Udyog and Others V/S CCE, Delhi - I Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
04-05-2018 J.P. Singhal & Co. and Others V/S CC (Prev.), Jaipur and Others. Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal New Delhi
03-05-2018 Biresh Singhal Versus Emaar MGF Land Ltd. & Others Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh
18-04-2018 M/s. Gupta International & Others Versus Ashok Kumar Singhal & Another High Court of Delhi
17-04-2018 Dr. Amit Singhal Versus State of Rajasthan High Court of Rajasthan Jodhpur Bench
16-04-2018 Asha Gupta Versus Inder Singhal & Others High Court of Delhi
13-04-2018 Jai Prakash Versus Anoop Singhal High Court of Delhi
29-03-2018 Lalit Kumar Chhibar Versus Dharmendra Singhal, Dinesh Kumar Yadav High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
02-02-2018 Srei Equipment Finance Limited Versus Santosh Kumar Singhal & Another High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
12-01-2018 Nitin Singhal Versus State of U.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
17-11-2017 Navin Kumar Singhal Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
15-11-2017 Neeraj Singhal Versus CBI High Court of Delhi
16-10-2017 M/s. Supertron Electronics Private Limited, Represented herein by its Authorized Signatory, Subodh Kumar (adult) Versus The Union of India Union of India, through the Secretary Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Having its office at Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi & Others High Court of Karnataka
29-08-2017 Somesh Paliwal Versus The Union of India Represented by the Secretary to the Government of India Department of Textile, Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
17-08-2017 Ritu Singhal Versus New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
14-07-2017 Ravi Singhal Versus Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University & Another High Court of Delhi
30-06-2017 Prem Jain Ispat Udyog Pvt. Limited V/S CC (Prev.), New Delhi Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal New Delhi
06-06-2017 Manomati Lahkar Versus The Union of India Represented by the Secretary Ministry of Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises Government of India, Udyog Bhawan New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
18-05-2017 Pan Relations Pvt. Ltd. Versus Priyank Kumar Singhal National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
16-05-2017 Manali Singhal & Another Versus Ravi Singhal & Others High Court of Delhi
08-03-2017 Dharamveer Gupta Alias Pradeep Gupta Versus Dr. S.C. Singhal, M.B.B.S.(MD) National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
02-02-2017 Suresh Singhal Versus State (Delhi Administration) Supreme Court of India
27-01-2017 Commissioner of Income Tax, Alwar Versus M/s. Singhal Industries, Bharatpur High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
24-01-2017 Manish Singhal Versus State of U.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
04-01-2017 Simran Singhal Versus Vice Chancellor Indraprastha University & Others High Court of Delhi
26-12-2016 Bank of India V/S Preeti Singhal Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal At Delhi
15-12-2016 P. Venu Versus The Union of India, through the Secretary, Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion, Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Udyog Bhavan, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Ernakulam Bench
15-12-2016 P. Venu Versus The Union of India, through the Secretary, Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion, Udyog Bhavan, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Ernakulam Bench
07-12-2016 Surendra Singhal Versus Alok Kumar Sinha & Others West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
10-11-2016 Amrit Prasad Singhal Versus Bal Kishan Gupta High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
21-10-2016 M/s. BVM Projects Pvt. Ltd. Versus Ghanshyam Singhal & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
14-10-2016 Mohd. Ayoub Mir & Others Versus Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Textiles, Govt. of India, Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh Bench
07-10-2016 Singhal Construction Company Registered Partnership firm B Narain Gate Versus Rajasthan State Agriculture Marketing Board through Administrator & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
20-09-2016 Kamlesh K. Singhal General Manager (MM) Versus Commissioner of Income-Tax-III High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
22-08-2016 Rekha Singhal Versus Rekha Choubey High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
09-06-2016 Gyanendra Kumar Singhal Versus M/s. Supertech Ltd. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
06-05-2016 Rakesh Birani & Another Versus Prem Narain Singhal & Another High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
22-04-2016 Vivek Singhal & Others Versus Manali Singhal & Another High Court of Delhi
31-03-2016 M/s. Katwa Udyog Limited, by its Managing Director Venkatesh Katwa Versus Union of India, Represented by its Secretary to Mines, New Delhi & Others High Court of Karnataka
29-03-2016 National Textiles Corporation Ltd. Versus Pankaj Singhal & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jodhpur Bench
27-10-2015 Laxmi Devi Singhal & Another Versus Kailash Singhal High Court of Madhya Pradesh
08-10-2015 Maruti Suzuki India Limited (Formerly Known As Maruthi Udyog Lrd.) Regd Off; I Nelson Mandela Road Vasant Kunj), New Delhi Versus Soma Shekar Sanganbasappa Khadabadi & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
10-09-2015 Dr. Kamini Singhal Versus The Government of NCT of Delhi, Through its Chief Secretary, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
26-08-2015 Rajan Singhal Versus State of U.T. Chandigarh & Others High Court of Punjab and Haryana
13-08-2015 Ravi Singhal & Others Versus Rajeev Goyal & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
11-06-2015 Usha Singhal Versus State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur & Others Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Delhi
14-05-2015 Suresh Chandra Goyal Versus Amit Singhal High Court of Delhi
24-03-2015 Shreya Singhal Versus Union of India Supreme Court of India
15-12-2014 Sohanlal Singhal & Another Versus Sunil Jain High Court of Madhya Pradesh
09-12-2014 K.K. Singhal & Others Versus Steel Strips Ltd. Supreme Court of India
04-12-2014 Dr. Ashish Singhal Versus State of Rajasthan & Another High Court of Rajasthan
01-12-2014 Dhirubhai Kalabhai Singhal Versus State of Gujarat High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
17-11-2014 Mahesh Chandra Donia Versus Anil Kumar Singhal High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
13-11-2014 Delhi Inframart Pvt. Ltd V/S N.K. Singhal High Court of Delhi
13-11-2014 Devshi Karsan Singhal Versus State of Gujarat High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
10-11-2014 Rohit Singhal Versus State of M.P. through Station House Officer & Another High Court of Madhya Pradesh
13-10-2014 Shri Chander Gauba & Others Versus Anuradha Singhal & Others Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
10-10-2014 Sanjiv Singhal & Others Versus Ece Industries Ltd. & Others High Court of Delhi
20-08-2014 Deepak Singhal Versus Dinesh Kumar Tandan High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
08-07-2014 S.K. Gupta Versus Vinay Singhal High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
01-07-2014 Vikrant Singhal & Another Versus State of Rajasthan & Others High Court of Rajasthan
27-05-2014 D.N. Singhal & Others Versus Kishan Kumar (Decd.) Through His Lrs & Others High Court of Delhi
24-04-2014 M/s. Singhal Maternity & Medical Centre & Others Versus Master Nishant Verma & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
17-04-2014 Sushil Kumar Singhal Versus Pramukh Sachiv Irrigation Department & Others Supreme Court of India
26-02-2014 Manish Kumar Versus Indu Singhal High Court of Rajasthan
19-02-2014 Om Prakash Singhal Versus K.L. Kurian High Court of Delhi
06-01-2014 Tarun Singhal Versus Devender Kumar & Others High Court of Delhi
09-12-2013 Pramod Kumari Singhal Versus Income Tax Officer & Another High Court of Madhya Pradesh
06-12-2013 Mahesh Singhal Versus Bhupinder Narain Bhatnagar High Court of Delhi
06-12-2013 Arvind Garg Versus Neeta Singhal High Court of Delhi
26-11-2013 Ashok Kumar Singhal & Another Versus State of Rajasthan High Court of Rajasthan