w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Shambhu Prasad Sharma Advocate v/s Renu Jogi


Company & Directors' Information:- PRASAD CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U32301TN1994PTC028160

Company & Directors' Information:- PRASAD AND CO. PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U67120DL1995PTC068088

Company & Directors' Information:- M. PRASAD AND CO LIMITED [Active] CIN = U67120WB1999PLC090325

Company & Directors' Information:- S C SHARMA AND CO PRIVATE LTD [Active] CIN = U74899DL1948PTC001507

Company & Directors' Information:- SHARMA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999UP2008PTC035620

Company & Directors' Information:- K P SHARMA (INDIA) PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U51109WB1988PTC045569

Company & Directors' Information:- SHARMA CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909WB2017PTC220657

Company & Directors' Information:- P C SHARMA AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45201DL1981PTC012750

Company & Directors' Information:- J. R. SHARMA & COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U24211DL1966PTC004602

Company & Directors' Information:- M K SHARMA AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74994DL1982PTC014090

Company & Directors' Information:- SHARMA AND SHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74900DL2015PTC276949

Company & Directors' Information:- SHARMA & CO. PVT LTD. [Strike Off] CIN = U28991WB1949PTC018064

Company & Directors' Information:- H PRASAD & CO PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U51109WB1944PTC011797

    Election Petition No. 2 of 2019

    Decided On, 18 March 2020

    At, High Court of Chhattisgarh

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOUTAM BHADURI

    For the Appearing Parties: N.K. Shukla, Rashika Soni, Advocates.



Judgment Text


Goutam Bhaduri, J.

1. Heard on application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC filed by the respondent No.1/returned candidate.

2. An application has been preferred on behalf of the respondent No.1/returned candidate that the challenge is made to the election of the constituency No.25 of Kota assembly of the district Bilaspur but the prayer as has been made in the election petition do not give any cause of action for which the challenge can be made under Section 100 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (for short 'the Act, 1951'). It is contended that neither any grounds which require on which the election petition can be entertained have been pleaded nor has been projected in the pleadings.

3. Learned counsel would submit that the main contention of the petitioner is that the manifesto of the petitioner's party namely "Bharat Bhoomi Party" of which the petitioner was a candidate, was not published in the nation wide circulating newspaper. It is stated that by such election petition it is pleaded that since the publication of the manifesto was not made in the newspaper which is circulating nationwide, the elections of the other States which were held along with the Chhattisgarh namely Madhya Pradesh, Telangana, Rajasthan and Mijorum were also affected. It is stated that since the election of the entire Chhattisgarh constituencies has been prayed to be set aside, therefore, the present election petition is not sustainable as it do not give this Court jurisdiction to exercise the power under Section 100 of the Act, 1951. Reading the prayer learned counsel would submit that along with Kota constituency assembly bearing No.25 which was held on 11.12.2018 has been prayed to be canceled along with 72 other seats of entire Chhattisgarh assembly. Referring to section 80 and 81 of the Act of 1951 counsel would submit that the word any election has been defined in section 81 which means that election as a whole cannot be challenged. Reliance was placed in in between Indrajit Barua & ors. Vs. Election Commission of India & ors, 1986 AIR(SC) 103, in between P.R. Francis Vs. A.V. Aryian & Anr, 1968 AIR(Ker) 252 and would submit that election of 72 seats the election as a whole cannot be challenged and the scheme of the Act is that each election has to be challenged by filing a separate election petition, therefore no cause of action arises for this court to go into trial in this election petition which is liable to be dismissed at the threshold.

4. Despite the repeated pass overs, the petitioner did not appear and on the earlier occasion too when the case was fixed no representation was made on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, in absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner the arguments were heard on the application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

5. By way of the present election the following prayer has been made:-

"(i) To declare the election of Kota Assembly 25 held on 11/12/2018 void alongwith 72 other seats of C.G. Assembly.

(ii) The cost of petition may be allowed to the petitioner alongwith any other suitable declaration which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper.

(iii) This Hon'ble Court may further be pleased to pass an interim direction to the respondents Election Commission to publish the MANIFESTO of petitioner's party before Parliamentary Election, 2019 for fair election not only in the State of Chhattisgarh but also in the entire Country in the nationwide newspapers, in the interest of justice."

6. At para 2 of the petition it is pleaded that the Election Commission was under responsibility to publish the party manifesto though it was given before the date of election. Consequently, the manifesto which was not published, the public could not read the same because of the polling date and time as it was published on 20.11.2018 little time hence remained and could not select the honest candidates. It is stated because the electors could not read the manifesto it caused an adverse effect on the assembly elections done in the five States i.e. Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Telangana, Rajasthan and Mijorum. As per the own pleading, the petitioner secured 10th position out of 12 candidates and it is repeated that non-publication of the election manifesto of Bharat Bhoomi Party, the entire election of five States was badly affected.

7. Section 80 of the of the Act, 1951 when are read in between the line purports that no election shall be called in question except by an election petition presented in accordance with the provisions of this part. Under Section 81 of the Act, 1951 an election petition calling in question any election may be presented on one or more of the grounds specified in sub-section (1) of Section 100 & 101 to the High Court. Therefore, an election can be challenged only by filing of an election petition in the manner prescribed by the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

8. The Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in case of Jagan Nath V. Jaswant Singh, 1954 AIR(SC) 210 has held that the General rule is well settled that the statutory requirement of election law must be strictly observed and that an election contest is not an election at law or a suit in equity but is a purely statutory proceeding unknown to the common law and that the Court possesses no common law power. Therefore, the reading of the Section 81 would show that the election in this context means not the general election or the entirety of the elections held in the State, but one election held in one constituency.

9. The Supreme Court in the case of Indrajit Barua and others v. Election Commission of India and others, 1986 AIR(SC) 103} has laid down the principle that the Act of 1951 does not contemplate a challenge to the election to the Legislature as a whole and the scheme of the Act is clear. It further held that the election of each of the returned candidates has to be challenged by filing of a separate election petition.

10. When such principles are tested against the prayer made, it shows the petitioner has made omnibus prayer to cancel all the elections of the Chhattisgarh constituencies of 72 seats as void. The said election petition, therefore, do not give a cause of action which can be a ground of challenge under Section 100 of the Act, 1951 wherein specific grounds have been enumerated for declaration of the election to be void. The pleadings are completely on the premise that the election manifesto since was not publishe

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

d before the specific time, therefore, it has affected the entire election held in the five States. The said prayer cannot be allowed being not a ground or give a cause of action under Section 100 of the Act, 1951. 11. In view of the aforesaid discussion prima facie on the basis of the pleadings of the petition, no cause of action said to have accrued on the ground enumerated by the petitioner. Therefore, in absence of material facts necessarily to make out a cause of action under Section 100 read with Section 81 of the Act, 1951, the petition sans merit. Accordingly, as a necessary fall out of the aforesaid discussion, the application under Order 7 Rule 11 of C.P.C. is allowed. The election petition is dismissed.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

16-10-2020 A. Prasad & Another Versus Union of India, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Civil Aviation, New Delhi & Others High Court of Kerala
16-10-2020 Umesh Kumar Sharma Versus State of Uttarakhand & Others Supreme Court of India
15-10-2020 State of U.P. Versus Gayatri Prasad Prajapati Supreme Court of India
15-10-2020 Rajasthan State Road Development & Construction Corporation Limited Versus Piyush Kant Sharma & Others Supreme Court of India
13-10-2020 Jitender Prasad Versus State (NCT of Delhi) High Court of Delhi
13-10-2020 N. Shankar Prasad Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, Velagapudi & Others High Court of Andhra Pradesh
12-10-2020 M/S. Renuka Poultry Farm Rep. By Its Managing Partner, Sri Badraiah, Karnataka Versus M/s. State Bank of India Rep By Its Assistant General Manager A Rajendra Prasad National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
07-10-2020 Laxmi Prasad Versus District Judge Sultanpur High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
03-10-2020 Bishnu Maya Rai Versus Dr. Rameshwar Prasad & Others High Court of Sikkim
01-10-2020 Ujwala Prasad & Others Versus New India Assurance Company Ltd., Rep. by Division Manager & Others High Court of Karnataka
01-10-2020 Ujwala Prasad & Others Versus New India Assurance Company Ltd., Rep. by Division Manager & Others High Court of Karnataka
23-09-2020 Charu Sharma & Others Versus Birla Sun Life Insurance Company Ltd., Maharshtra & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-09-2020 Vaibhav Prasad Singh Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Delhi
18-09-2020 Arun Sharma Versus Roxann Sharma In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
11-09-2020 Tuntun Prasad Versus The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Excise, Govt. of Bihar, Patna & Others High Court of Judicature at Patna
10-09-2020 Devendra Prasad Boda & Others Versus Director, Pension & Pensioner Welfare Dept., Jaipur (Raj.) & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jodhpur Bench
08-09-2020 Arun Kumar Sharma Versus Adesh Goel & Others High Court of Delhi
07-09-2020 Suneeta Sharma Versus Greater Mohali Area Development Authority, Punjab & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
02-09-2020 M/s. Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd. & Another Versus Prasad Vassudev Keni Supreme Court of India
02-09-2020 All India Union Bank Officer, Staff Association Rep. by its General Secretary, AIBOA, Chennai Versus Brajeshwar Sharma, The Chief General Manager(HR) Union Bank of India, Mumbai High Court of Judicature at Madras
31-08-2020 Rajesh Kumar Sharma @ Rajesh Kumar Versus C.B.I. High Court of Delhi
28-08-2020 Jigeshwar Prasad Deshmukh & Another Versus Authorized Officer, Bank of Baroda, Durg (CG) & Another High Court of Chhattisgarh
26-08-2020 Oriental Insurance Company Limited Versus Nand Kishore Sharma & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
25-08-2020 Abhishek Sharma @ Chanchal Pandit Versus State of U.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
24-08-2020 ICICI Bank, ICICI Bank Through Manager, Rajasthan Versus Ram Prakash Sharma National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
24-08-2020 Sanjay Kumar Sharma & Another Versus Union of India & Another High Court of Gauhati
21-08-2020 The Union of India & Others Versus Aditya Nandan Prasad @ Bala Prasad High Court of Judicature at Patna
21-08-2020 H.N. Sharma & Anr versus Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors. High Court of Judicature at Madras
18-08-2020 Ritlal Rai @ Ritlal Yadav @ Ritlal Ray @ Ritlal Prasad Singh Versus The U.O.I. through B. Hazara, Assistant Director, Prevention of Money Laundering Act (Complainant) & Others High Court of Judicature at Patna
17-08-2020 New India Assurance Company Ltd., New Delhi Versus Shailendra Prasad Singh National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
14-08-2020 Union of India & Another Versus M/s. K.C. Sharma & Co. & Others Supreme Court of India
14-08-2020 Nandyala Venkata Prasad Versus The State of A.P. High Court of Andhra Pradesh
14-08-2020 Nipun Sharma Versus Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Sector 12, Chandigarh High Court of Punjab and Haryana
11-08-2020 Vineeta Sharma V/S Rakesh Sharma and Others. Supreme Court of India
11-08-2020 V.P. Sharma & Others Versus Dr. G.S. Kochar Surgeon Urologist) & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
11-08-2020 Vineeta Sharma Versus Rakesh Sharma & Others Supreme Court of India
07-08-2020 Vijay Ramswarup Sharma Versus State of Gujarat High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
06-08-2020 Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd., Rajasthan Versus Kailash Chand Sharma National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
30-07-2020 Prasad Naik & Another Versus The Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority, through its Member Secretary & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
27-07-2020 Manish Sharma & Another Versus Urmila Arora High Court of Delhi
24-07-2020 Siba Prasad Sharmah Versus State of Assam & Others High Court of Gauhati
21-07-2020 Ex-Subedar Vinod Kumar Sharma Versus National Insurance Co. Ltd. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
20-07-2020 N. Prasad Versus Harithalakshmi High Court of Judicature at Madras
10-07-2020 P. Sreedevi Versus IVLN Venkata Lakshmi Narasimha Prasad High Court of for the State of Telangana
08-07-2020 Parmeshwar Prasad @ Prameshwar Yadav Versus State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Registration, Excise and Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna & Others High Court of Judicature at Patna
06-07-2020 B.A.S. Devi Prasad Versus The Telangana Co-operative Tribunal, Rep. by its Registrar High Court of for the State of Telangana
30-06-2020 Union Bank of India, Through Shri R. Rajendra Prasad, Branch Manager, Raichur Versus M/s. Tirumala Enterprises, Raichur National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
26-06-2020 Badri Prasad Jharia Versus Vatsalya Jharia High Court of Madhya Pradesh
25-06-2020 Firm: Narmada Prasad Rajesh Kumar, Bilaspur Versus Firm: Kailash Chand Ramesh Kumar Chandrapur, Distt. Janjgir-Champa High Court of Chhattisgarh
25-06-2020 Sudama Prasad Nai Versus State of Madhya Pradesh High Court of Madhya Pradesh
24-06-2020 Jwala Prasad Singh Versus State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Govt of Bihar Patna & Others High Court of Judicature at Patna
24-06-2020 Tara Prasad Sharma Versus State of Sikkim & Others High Court of Sikkim
23-06-2020 Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., Through The General Manager & Another Versus Narendra Kumar Sharma National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
22-06-2020 Ashok Sharma Versus State of Assam & Another High Court of Gauhati
22-06-2020 Jayanta Prasad Banik, Assam Versus STATE of Assam & Others High Court of Gauhati
18-06-2020 Pydah Subramanya Jagannadha Satya Prasad & Others Versus Pyda Sathiraju & Others High Court of Andhra Pradesh
17-06-2020 Aman Sharma Versus The Chief Election Commissioner & Another High Court of Madhya Pradesh
15-06-2020 Rajan Sharma & Another Versus Union of India & Another Supreme Court of India
12-06-2020 Raghuvir Prasad Kalicharan Kaithwar, (Since deceased, through His LRs. & Others Versus Hridainarain Rampakhan Pande High Court of Judicature at Bombay
03-06-2020 A.M. Prasad Raju Versus State of Telangana High Court of for the State of Telangana
02-06-2020 Prateek Sharma & Another Versus Union of India & Another High Court of Delhi
02-06-2020 Pravin Kishor Prasad Singh Versus The State of Bihar & Others High Court of Judicature at Patna
30-05-2020 Kshitiz Sharma Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
29-05-2020 Mahadev Prasad @ Shiv Ram Goojar & Another Versus State of U.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
19-05-2020 Randhir Rambrij Sharma Versus Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation High Court of Judicature at Bombay
19-05-2020 Mukesh Sharma Versus C.V. Ramana High Court of for the State of Telangana
14-05-2020 Meena Sharma Versus Nand Lal & Another High Court of Delhi
13-05-2020 Kumar Bimal Prasad Singh & Others Versus Hare Ram Singh & Others High Court of Judicature at Patna
13-05-2020 Shiv Prasad Singh Versus Nageshwar Kumar & Others High Court of Judicature at Patna
11-05-2020 Sreeja Prasad Versus State of Kerala, Represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam & Another High Court of Kerala
08-05-2020 Ram Prasad Nayak Versus State of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh
06-05-2020 Kamla Sharma Versus North Delhi Municipal Corporation High Court of Delhi
29-04-2020 Anurag Sarmah @ Sharma Versus State of Assam & Another High Court of Gauhati
22-04-2020 Chebrolu Leela Prasad Rao & Others Versus State of A.P. & Others Supreme Court of India
22-04-2020 Anand Sharma Versus State of Rajasthan & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
20-04-2020 Dr. Mahesh Sharma & Another Versus Cabinet Secretary, Govt. of India, Cabinet Secretariat, New Delhi & Others High Court of Rajasthan
15-04-2020 Sanjeev Sharma Versus State (N.C.T. of Delhi) High Court of Delhi
13-04-2020 Mamta Sharma & Another Versus State of Chhattisgarh Through The Chief Secretary, Chhattisgarh & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
10-04-2020 Ayodhya Prasad Mishra Versus State of U.P. High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
08-04-2020 Mohmmad Yunus Versus Madho Prasad Sharma High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
08-04-2020 C.H. Sharma & Another Versus State of Maharashtra & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
30-03-2020 Prashant Sharma Versus State of Sikkim & Others High Court of Sikkim
23-03-2020 Rajasthan Public Service Commission & Others Versus Megha Sharma & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
20-03-2020 Anju Sharma Versus Sunita Kumari & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
19-03-2020 Ram Chandra Prasad Singh Versus Sharad Yadav Supreme Court of India
19-03-2020 Nand Ram (D) Through Lrs. & Others V/S Jagdish Prasad (D) Through Lrs Supreme Court of India
18-03-2020 State of M.P. & Others Versus Rajendra Kumar Sharma High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwailor
18-03-2020 Ex-Gunner Virender Prasad Versus Union of India & Another Supreme Court of India
18-03-2020 Saurav Sharma Versus State of HP & Others High Court of Himachal Pradesh
17-03-2020 Aashu Pandit @ Aashu Bajpai @ Aash Narayan Sharma Versus Union of India High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
16-03-2020 Bhanu Prasad Variganji Versus State of Telangana High Court of for the State of Telangana
13-03-2020 Sankar Prasad Bose & Another Versus M/s. Shitala Construction Rep. by Ajit Panja & Others West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
13-03-2020 Unnati Bhardwaj & Another Versus K.P. Sharma High Court of Delhi
11-03-2020 Ajay Sharma & Others Versus Kulwant Singh High Court of Delhi
11-03-2020 Jyothi Prasad Versus K.V. Prakasan & Another High Court of Kerala
06-03-2020 Rampal Sharma & Others Versus State of Rajasthan & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
06-03-2020 Mithun Sharma Versus Tripura Gramin Bank & Others High Court of Tripura
05-03-2020 MES No. 238143, Ram Prasad Koiri & Others Versus The Union of India Represented by the Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Defence, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
05-03-2020 M/s. N.K. Enterprise, West Bengal & Another V/S Narayan Prasad Sharma & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
05-03-2020 Sancha Bahadur Subba Versus Ramesh Sharma High Court of Sikkim