w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Rajendra Pandit v/s Union of India, Through the Secretary Ministry of Communication, New Delhi & Others


Company & Directors' Information:- E N COMMUNICATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U92132DL2005PTC143469

Company & Directors' Information:- T C COMMUNICATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999DL2000PTC105354

Company & Directors' Information:- P. K. COMMUNICATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U92141DL1984PTC017748

Company & Directors' Information:- T I COMMUNICATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51109HP2009PTC031079

Company & Directors' Information:- RAJENDRA LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U99999KA1943PLC000306

Company & Directors' Information:- K AND D COMMUNICATION LIMITED [Active] CIN = U64120GJ1997PLC031879

Company & Directors' Information:- P & G COMMUNICATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74140MH2013PTC251505

Company & Directors' Information:- P J COMMUNICATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72900DL2000PTC105416

Company & Directors' Information:- M K COMMUNICATION PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U72900HP2006PTC030292

Company & Directors' Information:- H V COMMUNICATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U52602DL2009PTC193309

Company & Directors' Information:- A AND A COMMUNICATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U92132DL2001PTC110975

Company & Directors' Information:- H. K. COMMUNICATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U64100DL2013PTC255831

Company & Directors' Information:- B R COMMUNICATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U64203DL2002PTC114477

Company & Directors' Information:- N A COMMUNICATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74120DL2008PTC182901

Company & Directors' Information:- G & D COMMUNICATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U64200MP2007PTC019633

Company & Directors' Information:- RAJENDRA CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U17219TZ1948PTC000161

    Original application No. 040/00252 of 2019

    Decided On, 06 August 2019

    At, Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati

    By, THE HONOURABLE MRS. MANJULA DAS
    By, JUDICIAL MEMBER

    For the Applicant: B. Das, Advocate. For the Respondents: V.K. Bhatra, Sr. C.G.S.C.



Judgment Text


Oral Order:

1. The Applicant has this O.A. Under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 with the following reliefs.

“8.1 Direct the Respondent No.3, i.e the of Postal Services, Arunachal Division to forward/ recommend the applicant’s application Under Rule 38 of P & T Manual Vol. IV for inter Circle transfer to Vaishali Division, Bihal Circle to the Chief Post Master General (staff), Department of Posts, North East Circle, Shillong i.e Respondent No.2 Without further delay.

(ii)Direct the chief Post Master General (staff), North East Circle, Shillong, i.e Respondent No.2 that on receipt of the applicant’s application for the inter circle transfer Under Rule-38 of P&T Manual Vol.IV Same should be forwarded to Chief Post Master General Bihar Circle (Staff), Patna, without further delay.

(iii) it is further prayed that the respondent authorities may be directed to take all steps for transferring the applicant under Rule-38 of P & T Manual Vol.IV to Vaishali Division Under Bihar Circle, Patna from Arunachal Pradesh Division Under North East Circle, Shillong without further delay.

(iv) Any appropriate Order or Direction to give full and effective relief’s to the applicant.”

2. Mr.B.Das, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant initially joined in the Postal Services as Post man in the year 2002, and posted at Daporojo SO Under Director Postal Services Arunachal Pradesh Division, Itanagar. In the year 2005 from Daporijo S.O. he was transferred to Itanagar, HO. While Working at Itanagar HO, applicant appeared in LGO Examination on 2013 for the post of Postal Assistant and he was declared successful on 21.4.2014. While Working as a Postal Assistant at Itanagar, applicant was transferred to seppa S.O. vide order dated 25.08.2014, then to itanagar S.O. vide order dated 08.03.2017. Thereafter, vide order dated 18.03.2017, he was transferred to Sagaliee SO under papumpare District from where the applicant was again transferred to Naharlagun SO. Thereafter, vide order dated 03.02.2018, he was sent on deputation to Ranganadi project SO, Yazali, District Lower Subansiri wherefrom he was transferred to Itanagar Head Post office in which he is continuing as Such.

3. Learned Counsel further submitted that while the applicant was working as a postman at Itanagar HO, under Director of Postal Service, AP Division (Respondent No.3) he applied for inter circle transfer under Rule 38 of P & T Manual Vol. IV from Arunachal Pradesh Division, Itanagar under North East Circle Shillong to Vaishali Division, under Bihar Circle, Patna on the ground of ill health of his wife Smti Mila Devi. Thereafter, the inter-circle transfer of the applicant under Rule 38 was duly approved by the Chief Postmaster General (staff), Department of Posts, North East Circle, Shillong, i.e. Respondent No.2 vide letter No.STAFF/152-10/2011 dated 09.02.2012

4. According to learned counsel for the applicant despite the approval of the Respondent No.2, the inter circle transfer of the applicant was kept pending for long time. Situated thus, the applicant’s wife Smti Mila Devi had made a representation before the Hon’ble Prime Minister of India on 07.06.2017, after which, vide letter No.STAFF/152/10/2011 dated 14.07.2017, the Asstt.PMG (Staff), O/O the Chief Postmaster General, N.E. Circle, shillong Requested the SP (HQ), Itanagar to obtain fresh application under Rule 38 from the applicant and also requested to forward the same to the office of the Chief Post Master General, N.E. Circle, Shillong along with recommendation at the earliest.

5. Learned Counsel further submitted that the applicant had again submitted his fresh application under Rule 38 and the same was forwarded to the office of the Respondent No.2 on 07.08.2017 from the office of the Director of Postal Service, AP Division, Itanagar without recommendation, showing the cause as shortage of the staff A.P. Division.

6. Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that the applicant’s wife Smti Mila Devi again made a representation on 18.08.2017 before the Hon’ble prime Minister, Govt. of India for Consideration of the application of the applicant under Rule 38. In response to the said representation, the Section Officer (SPB-11) , Ministry of Communication, Department of Post, vide letter dated 25.09.2017 requested the respondent No.2 to take further necessary action as per rule.

7. According to the learned counsel for the applicant Shri B.Das, the applicant has a right to request for inter circle transfer and Respondent No.2 & 3 has discretion to consider the same and forward /recommend to respective circle. However, such discretion is not unfettered and has to be exercised reasonably and not arbitrarily in a pick and choose manner.

8. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the Respondent No.3 has exercised the discretion arbitrarily, unfairly and unreasonably by not forwarding/ recommending the case of the applicant for inter circle transfer, whereas smit Bidyarani Devi, who is junior to the applicant has already been transferred under Rule 38 of the P & T Manual Vol. IV. Learned counsel also submitted vide letter dated 21.12.2018 Office of the Respondent No.2 has requested the Respondent No.3 to re-examine the Rule 38 transfer of the applicant, but the Respondent No.3 has not yet considered the same.

9. Mr.V.K. Bhatra, learned Sr. C.G.S.C. for the respondents prayed for time to obtain instructions but as the matter is pending before the respondent authority since 2011 and till no fruitful action was taken by respondents authority as such, I am not inclined to grant time for taking instruction as the matter is already pending before the Chief Postmaster General who is the competent authority and can take the matter for consideration.

10. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant Perused the pleadings and the documents produced before me.

11. It is noted that the applicant initially joined the postal services as postman in the year 2002. Since 2011, applicant made his application on request under Rule 38 of the P & T Manual Vol. IV as prescribed by the authority. However, still the matter is not sorted out. It was alleged by the applicant that one of the station junior at Arunachal Pradesh smti Bidyarani Devi whose case has been considered favourably by the authority vide discharge letter dated 24.3.2018 to make the transfer as per her request at senior station but the applicant’s case was not considered.

12. From the perusal of O.A. and annexures, it appears that the case of the applicant was forwarded by the Respondent No.3 to the Respondent No.2, without recommendation on the ground of shortage of staff in the A.P. Division.

13. During the course of argument, learned counsel for the applicant has drawn my attention to the Annexure A-4 letter dated 21.12.2018 vide which the Respondent No.2 has requested Respondent No.3 to re- examine the case of the applicant. The contents of the letter is quoted below:-

“with reference to the above cited letter, it is requested to kindly re-examine the Rule-38 case of the above official which was not recommended by you earlier due to acute shortage of staff as recently this office has received an information from your office that there are lots of surplus PA in your division.” Action taken may kindly be intimated to this office immediately as report on the same is called by postal Directorate.”

14. The Respondent No.2 who is the Competent authority to consider inter circle transfer has passed orders to re-examine the Rule 38 transfer of the applicant, the Respondent No.3 has not acted on the same. Since the competent authority has already observed that there are lots of surplus postal Assistant in the A.P. Division, this court f

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

ails to understand the reason for not recommending the case of the applicant by the Respondent No.3 . On the face of letter dated 21.12.2018 this court is not inclined to grand time to sr. C.G.S.C. to obtain instruction. 15. Accordingly, without issuing notice to the respondents, I direct the Respondent No.2 & 3 to consider application of the applicant under Rule 38 of P & T Manual Vol.IV in the light of the letter dated 21.12.2018 (Annexure 4 ) as expeditiously as possible but not later than 2 months from the date of receipt of this order. 16. In my view, if the matter is not disposed of by this court, the applicant may suffer as the competent authority has already observed that there are lots of surplus PA in the A.P. Division. 17. With the above directions, O.A. stands disposed of at the admission stage itself. No order as to costs.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

06-10-2020 Rajendra Eknath Apugade & Another Versus The State of Maharashtra & Another High Court of Judicature at Bombay
31-08-2020 Rajendra Singh Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Delhi
24-08-2020 M/s. Govindhji Jewat & Co., Represented by its Partner Rajendra Kone & Others Versus M/s. Rukmani Mills Ltd., Represented by its Board of Directors, Madurai & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
24-08-2020 R.K. Dawra Versus Union of India, Through Secretary Ministry of Communication, Department of Telecommunication, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh Bench
11-08-2020 Atalbiharikumar Rajendra Mandal Versus State of Gujarat High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
23-07-2020 Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., through its Authorized signatory, Pravin Prabhakar Prabhu Versus Kameshwari Rajendra Sabnis & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
07-07-2020 Rajesh Kumar Versus Union of India through the Secretary Ministry of Communication, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
30-06-2020 Union Bank of India, Through Shri R. Rajendra Prasad, Branch Manager, Raichur Versus M/s. Tirumala Enterprises, Raichur National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
19-06-2020 Vipin Kumar Choudhary Versus Makhan Lal Chaturvedi National University Of Journalism & Communication - Bhopal National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-06-2020 Rajendra Singh & Others Versus National Insurance Company Limited & Others Supreme Court of India
16-06-2020 Union of India, Represented by The Secretary Posts, Ministry of Communication, Department of Posts, New Delhi & Others Versus G. Lakshmi & Others High Court of Kerala
10-06-2020 Director of Income-Tax, International Taxation Versus M/s. Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd. High Court of Karnataka
26-05-2020 Rajendra Kumar & Others Versus Raj Kumar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
19-05-2020 Transport Manager, Thane Municipal Transport Undertaking Versus Rajendra Visanji Thakkar & Another High Court of Judicature at Bombay
14-05-2020 Rajendra Kumar Chandrol Versus High Court of Madhya Pradesh
21-04-2020 Babu Rajendra Versus Basalingappa & Others High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench OF Kalaburagi
18-03-2020 State of M.P. & Others Versus Rajendra Kumar Sharma High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwailor
18-03-2020 Ritesh Rajendra Thakur Versus State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary, Tribal Development Department & Another High Court of Judicature at Bombay
17-03-2020 Rajendra & Others Versus The State of Maharashtra In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
16-03-2020 Satish Kumar Khandelwal V/S Rajendra Jain & Others High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Indore
12-03-2020 Rajendra & Others Versus The State of Maharashtra In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
04-03-2020 Anil Ramdas Pawar V/S Union of India, Through Secretary, Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, Department of Telecommunications & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
28-02-2020 Neena Aggarwal Versus Base 39 Mobile Communication & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
26-02-2020 Presilish Marak Versus The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Communication, New Delhi, & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
24-02-2020 Manaj Tollway Private Limited Versus Rajendra Rahane Superintending Engineer & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
19-02-2020 Rajendra K. Bhutta Versus Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority & Another Supreme Court of India
13-02-2020 Life Insurance Corporation of India Through Its Zonal Manager, Life Insurance Corporation Of India, New Delhi Versus Rajendra Sudamrao Shinde & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
11-02-2020 Nisar Ahmad Versus Rajendra Kumar Soni & Others High Court of Delhi
10-02-2020 Rajendra Versus Jugalkishor & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
05-02-2020 M/s. Kapoor Imaging Private Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director Versus M/s. Kodak (India) Private Limited, [Formerly known as M/s.Kodak Graphic Communication (India) Private Limited] Rep. by its Director, Kalpataru Synergy High Court of Judicature at Madras
30-01-2020 Vishnu Varma Pilli Versus The Union of India, Represented by Communication & Information Technology, Department of Electronics & Information Technology, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
20-01-2020 M/s. Fair Communication & Consultants & Another Versus Surendra Kerdile Supreme Court of India
17-01-2020 Sanjiv Rajendra Bhatt Thro Shweta Sanjiv Bhatt Versus State of Rajasthan High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
17-01-2020 Rajendra Mishra Versus State of Bihar & Others High Court of Judicature at Patna
17-01-2020 Rajendra Saxena & Another Versus Sharda Ratnam & Another High Court of Judicature at Bombay
16-01-2020 Rajendra Kumar Verma & Another Versus Dolly Rani Bag & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
10-01-2020 Harendra Ramchandra Pathak Versus Rajendra Ratan Mhatre High Court of Judicature at Bombay
07-01-2020 Union of India Versus Reliance Communication Limited & Another Supreme Court of India
07-01-2020 Kamal Nath, Accountant, Divisional Office Tezpur, Sonitpur Versus The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Communication & IT Department of Posts, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
06-01-2020 Rajendra Kumar Khera & Others Versus U.P. Awas Vikas Parishad & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
06-01-2020 Union of India, Represented by Its Secretary, Department of Posts, Ministry of Communication & Information Technology, New Delhi Versus Shibu M. Job, Now Working as Director (Postal Life Insurance), Kolkatha & Others High Court of Kerala
06-01-2020 Dr. N. Rajendra Prasad & Others Versus Lingampally Srinivas & Others Telangana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hyderabad
02-01-2020 Mukul Deka Versus The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, To the Government of India, Ministry of Communication & IT, Department of Posts, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
26-12-2019 Rajendra Manohar Kowli & Another Versus Bank of India Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal At Mumbai
26-12-2019 Rajendra Girdhar Patel Versus State Of Gujarat & Others High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
13-12-2019 M/s. Kapoor Imaging Private Limited, Chennai Versus M/s. Kodak (India) Private Limited, [Formerly known as M/s.Kodak Graphic Communication (India) Private Limited] Mumbai High Court of Judicature at Madras
10-12-2019 Rajendra Diwan Versus Pradeep Kumar Ranibala & Another Supreme Court of India
03-12-2019 Rajendra Singh Tomar & Others Versus State of Uttarakhand Through Secretary & Others Supreme Court of India
02-12-2019 Sathi Khurana Versus Rajendra Singh Khurana High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
02-12-2019 Ajit Rajendra Bhagwat & Others Versus The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Higher and Technical Education Mantralaya & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
28-11-2019 Balasaheb Govind Basugade Versus Rajendra Shivaji Kumthekar & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
28-11-2019 Nabasius Warjri Versus The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Communication Department of Post, New Delhi & Another Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
20-11-2019 Jaihind Sahakari Pani Purvatha Mandali Ltd. Shirdhon, Kolhapur Versus Rajendra Bandu Khot & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
14-11-2019 Galam Shah Zaman Versus The Director General of Posts, Ministry of Communication & IT, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
13-11-2019 Ranjit Roy Versus Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to the Telecom Commission, Ministry of Communication, Department of Telecom, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
13-11-2019 Biju Borah Versus Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, To the Department of Posts, Government of India, Ministry of Communication Information & Technology, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
08-11-2019 Ranjit Sukla Baidya, Tripura Versus Union of India, Represented by the Secretary cum Commissioner, Department of Post, Ministry of Communication & Technology, Government of India, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
05-11-2019 Victoria Gonmei, Cachar Versus The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary To the Government of India, Ministry of Communication & IT, Department of Posts, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
02-11-2019 Rajendra Prasad Versus Sikkim University & Others High Court of Sikkim
01-11-2019 Jivan Chandra Handique Versus The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to the Government of Communication, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
31-10-2019 Union of India & Others Versus Association of the Employees of Indian Institute of Mass Communication (Regd.) & Others High Court of Delhi
30-10-2019 Suo Moto Proceedings on a Communication Received from The II Additional Sessions Judge, Ernakulam Regarding Wrong Committal In SC 242/2015 on that Court Versus State of Kerala, Represented by Regional Drug Inspector, Office of The Assistant Drugs Controller, Ernakulam Represented by The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam & Others High Court of Kerala
25-10-2019 K. Rajendra Prasad & Others Versus State of Andhra Pradesh & Others High Court of Andhra Pradesh
18-10-2019 Rajendra Agrawal Versus State of Bihar & Others High Court of Judicature at Patna
15-10-2019 Sharda Mittal, Barnala Versus Union of India through the Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Communication & I.T. Department of Post, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh Bench
11-10-2019 New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Versus Rajendra Kumar & Another Madya Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Bhopal
25-09-2019 Kalpana Rajendra Kothari & Others Versus Santosh Arvind Jangam & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
20-09-2019 Monir Uddin Ahmed, Junior Engineer (Civil), Postal Civil Sub Division, (Dimapur), Nagaland Versus Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, Govt. of India, Ministry of Communication & IT, Department of Posts, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
11-09-2019 Krushna Shivaji Patil Versus Parmanand Rajendra Patil & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
05-09-2019 M/s. Sugesan Transport Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Director, Kanthibai Rajendra Sheth Versus M/s. E.C. Bose & Company Private Limited, Kolkata & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
03-09-2019 Raju @ Rajendra Versus State of U.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
16-08-2019 Rajendra Mahadeorao Chaudhary Versus Gajanan Keshavrao Bore In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
06-08-2019 Rajendra Kumar Goyal & Another Versus South City Project (Kolkata) Ltd. & Others West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
06-08-2019 Tapas Malakar Versus The Union of India Represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Communication & Information Technology, Government of India, Central Secretariat, New Delhi & Others High Court of Tripura
05-08-2019 Rajendra Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
30-07-2019 N. Rajendra Reddy Versus The Block Development Officer, Sholingur Panchayat Union, Vellore District & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
29-07-2019 Rajendra Versus Gopinath In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
29-07-2019 Rajendra Versus Vikas & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
26-07-2019 Rajendra Agarwal & Others Versus State of U.P. & Another High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
22-07-2019 Rajendra Prasad Sharma Versus M/s. Hartin Harris Ltd. High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
18-07-2019 Sujan Bhabani Prasad Chatterjee & Another Versus Rajendra Kumar Singh & Another High Court of Judicature at Bombay
10-07-2019 Shristi Communication Network Versus Technobile Systems Pvt. Ltd. & Another High Court of Delhi
08-07-2019 C. Rajendra Prasad Versus The Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority, Rep. by its Member Secretary, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
05-07-2019 Rajendra Versus The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary, Tribal Development & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
04-07-2019 Rajendra Kumar through Nisar Mohammad Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh High Court of Madhya Pradesh
02-07-2019 G.V. Reddy Versus Ministry of Communication Employees Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. High Court of Karnataka
01-07-2019 Rajendra Shivsing Chanda & Others Versus Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
17-06-2019 Rajendra Kumar Versus The State of Bihar & Others High Court of Judicature at Patna
22-05-2019 Superwave Communication & Infra Solution Private Limited & Another Versus State of West Bengal & Another High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
06-05-2019 Anuradha Chakraborty Versus The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Communication & Information Technology, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
02-05-2019 Indian Potash Ltd. & Others Versus Media Contents & Communication Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Another High Court of Delhi
30-04-2019 Siddesh Tours and Travels (Prop.Shri Rajendra Ramdas Yerandekar) Versus The Commissioner of Service Tax Mumbai VII Commissionerate High Court of Judicature at Bombay
23-04-2019 Dr. P. Rajendra Prasad Versus The State of Telangana, rep by its Special Chief Secretary, Health, Medical & Family Welfare Department & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
18-04-2019 Sant Kejaji Maharaj Smruti & Another Versus Rajendra Deoraoji Raut & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
15-04-2019 Rajendra Singh & Others Versus State of Madhya Pradesh High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwailor
09-04-2019 Raju @ Rajendra Dashrath Khaire & Another Versus The State of Maharashtra & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
04-04-2019 Binud Sonowal Versus Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to the Department of Posts, Government of India, Ministry of Communication, Information & Technology, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
03-04-2019 Nayan Talukdar Versus The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to the Government of India, Department of Posts, Ministry of Communication, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
01-04-2019 Lakhidhar Das Versus The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to the Department of Posts, Government of India, Ministry of Communication Information & Technology, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
01-04-2019 Kerlinmon Kharshandi, SP (HQ), Itanagar Versus The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Communication & Information Technology, Department of Post of Revenue Central Board of Excise, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati