At, High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIV KUMAR SHARMA
For the Appellant: Paras Kuhmad, Advocate. For the Respondent: M.R. Singhvi, Advocate.
1. The meaningful question that falls for consideration in the instant revision is whether a void condition of agreement is severable from the main agreement or it renders entire agreement as void ?
2. This question arises in circumstances set out below.
3. The petitioner filed an application u/s 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short the Act of 1940) inter alia questioning the validity of Article 14 of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 18-8-1989 (in short the MOU) initiated by Shri Shiv Prakash, respondent No. 2, at the instance of the