w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Pritam Lal Makhija v/s Akhil Bhartiya Aggarwal Sammelan Thr its Joint Organised Secretary Virender Gupta


Company & Directors' Information:- N M AGGARWAL AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909DL1986PTC023967

Company & Directors' Information:- V. K. AGGARWAL & COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45206DL2012PTC237993

Company & Directors' Information:- AKHIL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51109JK2000PTC002046

Company & Directors' Information:- R. S. AGGARWAL AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45203DL1982PTC013965

Company & Directors' Information:- C. LAL LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909HR2012PLC046499

Company & Directors' Information:- AKHIL CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U74900TG2015PTC098902

Company & Directors' Information:- R R AGGARWAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U16000MH1957PTC010934

Company & Directors' Information:- B K AGGARWAL AND COMPANY PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U16003PB1988PTC008247

Company & Directors' Information:- MAKHIJA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999MH1949PTC007028

    RC.REV. No. 431 of 2016

    Decided On, 03 September 2019

    At, High Court of Delhi

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

    For the Petitioner: Prasoon Kumar, Aashish Kumar, Sarita Kumari, Advocates. For the Respondent: V.P. Rana, Advocate.



Judgment Text

(Oral)

RC.REV. 431/2016 & CM APPL.32783/2016 (stay), CM APPL. 39582/2019 (for fixation of user charges)

1. Petitioner impugns order dated 02.08.2016, whereby, the application seeking leave to defend of the petitioner has been rejected.

2. Petitioner is a tenant in a shop measuring 7 feet x 18 feet of ground floor of the property bearing Nos.8596, 8597 and 8543, more particularly, as described in red colour in the site plan annexed with the eviction petition.

3. Subject petition for eviction was filed by the respondent contending that the respondent is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act and is an all India level society conducting its office through employees employed in the organisation/society. As per the respondent landlord, it is in possession of a portion of the ground floor, entire first floor and the second floor.

4. It is contended in the petition that the accommodation in the possession of the respondent landlord is falling short and it is not able to accommodate the staff employed by it. There is a shortage of sitting space to accommodate the staff, as such, the portion in possession of the petitioner tenant is required for bonafide expansion of its office.

5. Leave to defend application was filed by the petitioner contending that there are only 7 employees in the office of the respondent and in the last 15 years it had never employed more than 8 persons. It is alleged that the respondent landlord has 472.5 Sq. ft. space available on the ground floor, 598.5 Sq. ft. on the first floor and 598.5 Sq. ft. space available on the second floor besides the terrace also being available to the respondent landlord. A ground has been taken that the need is not bonafide and the requirement as set up is artificial, imaginary and expresses a mere desire and not a necessity.

6. In the reply to leave to defend, the respondent landlord has contended that the respondent society is a national level society having 21 national office bearers, 72 State bearers and 17 Committee bearers and more than 50 office bearers visit the office daily for various works.

7. It is averred that the ground floor is used for the office purpose which is too small to accommodate the national office of the organisation. It is, however, admitted that there are only 7 employees employed to look after the work of the Delhi office.

8. It is further stated that the first floor is used as a conference room and the second floor having two rooms are used as storage.

9. Perusal of the eviction petition shows that the respondent/landlord has not explained the accommodation in its possession and has merely stated that it is falling short in terms of the accommodation and the space already available is not sufficient to accommodate the staff employed by the respondent landlord. It is further averred that there is a shortage of sitting space to accommodate the staff.

10. Per contra, the petitioner tenant has categorically taken a ground that the respondent landlord has never employed more than 8 employees in its office in the last 15 years and has 472.5 Sq. ft. space available on the ground floor and approximately 600 Sq. ft. space available on each of the first and the second floors.

11. Perusal of the petition as also the reply to the leave to defend shows that the landlord has expressed a desire to expand its office. The Rent Controller has rejected the grant of leave to defend solely on the ground that the tenant cannot dictate as to how the landlord has to utilize the premises and it is for the landlord to decide as to what is suitable and what is not.

12. No doubt the tenant cannot dictate to the landlord as to how it has to utilise its property and the landlord is a best judge of its accommodation. Nonetheless, it is also to be seen that a petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act would lie only if there is a bonafide need of the landlord for additional accommodation. Bonafide need/bonafide necessity is distinct from a mere wish or desire.

13. Reading of the petition shows that the landlord has merely expressed a desire to expand and has not even pleaded as to how there is a need for expansion of additional space.

14. In my view, the tenant has raised sufficient grounds which, if established at trial, would disentitle the respondent landlord of an order of eviction. The application seeking leave to defend discloses a triable issue and sufficient ground as to why leave to defend should be granted.

15. The Rent Controller has clearly committed an error in not noticing the distinction between the bonafide necessity and a mere desire.

16. It may be noticed that the respondent landlord has neither denied the number of the employees nor the extent of accommodation available with it. In the reply, the respondent landlord merely stated that 50 people visit the office on daily basis. It is a matter of trial as to whether the existing accommodation available with the landlord is sufficient to accommodate 7 employees and 50 visiting members.

17. Clearly, the Rent Controller has committed an error in declining to grant the leave to defend to the petitioner.

18. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and also the facts, as pleaded by the petitioner tenant, specifically stating the extent of accommodation in possession of the landlord and also the plea that there are only 7 employees, I am of the view that the petitioner tenant has shown sufficient grounds to entitle the petition

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

er/tenant to a leave to defend the eviction petition. 19. Accordingly, impugned order dated 02.08.2016 is set aside. Leave is granted to the petitioner to defend the petition. 20. Petition is allowed in the above terms. 21. List the eviction petition for consideration before the concerned Rent Controller on 17.10.2019. Petitioner shall file his written statement within a period of 30 days from today. 22. Since the eviction petition was filed in the year 2014, the Rent Controller is directed to expedite the proceedings. 23. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

13-10-2020 M/S. Device Driven (India) Pvt. Ltd., Represented by its Director, Indu Lakshmy Lal & Versus The Commissioner of Income Tax, Thiruvananthapuram High Court of Kerala
29-09-2020 Laddu Lal Mahto Versus Managing Director, Tata Motors Limited, Bihar & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
28-09-2020 S. Akhil & Another Versus The State of Kerala, Represented by Secretary, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Thycaud & Others High Court of Kerala
09-09-2020 Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Others Versus Goverdhan Lal Soni & Another Supreme Court of India
08-09-2020 Murari Lal Versus State of U.P & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
31-08-2020 Vipan Aggarwal & Others Versus State of J&K High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
28-08-2020 Chhotey Lal Versus State of U.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
18-08-2020 Lal Chand Versus Union Territory of J&K & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
11-08-2020 Shankar Lal Yadav & Another Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Delhi
06-08-2020 Ram Lal Versus State of HP & Others High Court of Himachal Pradesh
17-07-2020 Pyare Lal Versus State of Haryana Supreme Court of India
16-07-2020 Max Bupa Health Insurance Company Ltd. Versus Raveessh Aggarwal Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission New Delhi
30-06-2020 Sindhu. S. Lal Versus Revenue Divisional Officer, Adoor & Others High Court of Kerala
29-06-2020 Mohan Lal Jain Versus Insolvency & Bankruptcy Board of India & Another High Court of Delhi
26-06-2020 Amrut Lal @ Amrit Lal Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
24-06-2020 M/s. Atul Aggarwal & Sons Versus M/s. Mercedes Benz India Pvt. Ltd. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
23-06-2020 Pankaj Aggarwal Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Delhi
23-06-2020 Munna Lal Versus State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Medical & Health Lko & Others High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
19-06-2020 Vipin Kumar Choudhary Versus Makhan Lal Chaturvedi National University Of Journalism & Communication - Bhopal National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-06-2020 Jivan Lal Verma Versus Kishan Agrotek National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
17-06-2020 Ashish Aggarwal Versus Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Limited, New Delhi National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
12-06-2020 Arjun Aggarwal Versus Union of India & Another High Court of Delhi
11-06-2020 Moti Lal @ Moti Lal Patwa Versus Union of India, Ministry of Finance through the Director, Enforcement Directorate, Delhi & Another High Court of Judicature at Patna
03-06-2020 Latelraj Suryawanshi (Latelram Suryawanshi wrongly mentioned in the impugned judgment) Versus Hori Lal Tamboli & Another High Court of Chhattisgarh
26-05-2020 Ravikiran Aggarwal & Another Versus --------- High Court of Judicature at Bombay
21-05-2020 Aravapalli Krishna Murthy Versus Syed Lal Saheb Died & Others High Court of Andhra Pradesh
20-05-2020 Diwari Lal & Others Versus State of U.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
19-05-2020 Sandeep, Rahul Aggarwal Vijender Yadav & Another Versus State Through Central Bureau of Investigation High Court of Delhi
14-05-2020 Meena Sharma Versus Nand Lal & Another High Court of Delhi
11-05-2020 Shiv Lal (Since Deceased) Versus Mohan Lal High Court of Punjab and Haryana
08-05-2020 Mohan Lal Versus State of NCT of Delhi Supreme Court of India
05-05-2020 Lalita Aggarwal Versus Principal Commissioner of Income Tax & Others High Court of Delhi
01-05-2020 Anil K. Aggarwal, Advocate & Another Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Delhi
30-04-2020 Jagdish Lal Versus State of Himachal Pradesh High Court of Himachal Pradesh
29-04-2020 Col Ramneesh Pal Singh Versus Sugandhi Aggarwal High Court of Delhi
20-04-2020 Babu Lal Versus State (N.C.T. of Delhi) High Court of Delhi
07-04-2020 (The State) The National Investigation Agency, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, Represented by the Superintendent of Police, Assam Versus Akhil Gogoi High Court of Gauhati
24-03-2020 Babu Lal & Others Versus Para Devi & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
17-03-2020 Meghna Singh (Through: Her Natural Guardian) Avita D Lal Versus Central Board of Secondary Education & Another High Court of Delhi
17-03-2020 The Joint Labour Commissioner and Registering Officer & Another Versus Kesar Lal Supreme Court of India
11-03-2020 Ram Dulari & Another Versus Ram Lal & Another High Court of Himachal Pradesh
11-03-2020 Fiitjee Ltd., Through Its A.R Sh. Ashish Kr. Aggarwal, New Delhi & Another Versus Puneet Garg (Minor) Through His Natural Guardian His Father Sh. Anil Kuamr, Barnala National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
10-03-2020 M. Akhil Versus State of Kerala, Represented by The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam & Another High Court of Kerala
03-03-2020 Prayag Polytech Private Limited Through Milan Aggarwal, Director C-587 Versus Iworld Digital Solution Private Limited National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
02-03-2020 Vikas Aggarwal Versus Bal Krishna Gupta & Others High Court of Delhi
02-03-2020 Akhil Ahmad Versus The Commissioner for Agriculture, Pune Region Pune & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
29-02-2020 Lal Chand Versus State of H.P. High Court of Himachal Pradesh
28-02-2020 Neena Aggarwal Versus Base 39 Mobile Communication & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
27-02-2020 Manohar Lal Versus State Of Himachal Pradesh High Court of Himachal Pradesh
27-02-2020 Aman Khattar Versus Jawahar Lal High Court of Delhi
26-02-2020 M/s. Kiran Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. Through Director Manohar Lal Ahuja, Uttar Pradesh Versus Yashpal National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
19-02-2020 M/s. Behari Lal & sons V/S The State of Punjab High Court of Punjab and Haryana
18-02-2020 M/s. Girdhari Lal Constructions (P) Ltd. Dwaraka, New Delhi, Registered Office Bhatinda, Punjab, Represented by Its Director, Vikas Mehta Versus Union of India, Represented by Its Secretary, Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs, New Delhi & Others High Court of Kerala
18-02-2020 Dr. Hira Lal Versus State of Bihar & Others Supreme Court of India
14-02-2020 New India Assurance Company Ltd. Through Its Duly Constituted Attorney, Manager, Delhi Versus Chaman Lal National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
13-02-2020 Jhanak Lal V/S State of Madhya Pradesh High Court of Chattisgarh
13-02-2020 Nitin Aggarwal Versus M/s. Imperia Structures Limited Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission New Delhi
13-02-2020 Vikas Panchayat, Gram Boheda Through Sarpanch, Rajasthan Versus Badri Lal & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
13-02-2020 Ashok Alias Gore Lal Veruss State of U.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
11-02-2020 Kanhaiya Lal Versus Lala Ram & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
11-02-2020 Neeti Aggarwal Versus M/s. Top Runners Impex Pvt. Ltd. & Others High Court of Delhi
10-02-2020 Rajender Prasad Aggarwal & Others Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Punjab and Haryana
06-02-2020 Heera Lal Versus State High Court of Rajasthan
06-02-2020 Ashish Aggarwal Versus Sushil Kumar High Court of Delhi
05-02-2020 Chhotey Lal @ Chottu Versus State High Court of Delhi
04-02-2020 Dr. G.K. Aggarwal, Senior Consultant Orthopedic Surgeon Versus Lalit Sayal & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
31-01-2020 Manohar Lal Versus State of H.P. & Others High Court of Himachal Pradesh
29-01-2020 Sushila Aggarwal & Others Versus State (NCT of Delhi) & Another Supreme Court of India
29-01-2020 Karnveer Singh Versus Panji Lal Damor High Court of Rajasthan Jodhpur Bench
28-01-2020 Mohit Lal Ghosh Versus The State of West Bengal & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
27-01-2020 M/s. Urban Umbrella Development And Management Company Through Its Proprietor/Authorized Signatory, Punjab V/S Pawan Lal & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
27-01-2020 Priyantha Lal Ramanayake Versus The Hon. Attorney General Supreme Court of Sri Lanka
24-01-2020 Chuni Lal Versus Munshi Ram & Another Supreme Court of India
24-01-2020 Lal Mohammed Versus State (Nct of Delhi) High Court of Delhi
23-01-2020 Bajrang Lal Sharma Versus C.K. Mathew & Others Supreme Court of India
22-01-2020 Seema Lal & Others V/S State of Kerala, Represented by The Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Secretariat, Trivandrum & Others High Court of Kerala
21-01-2020 Kishan Lal Chadha @ Krishan Lal Chadha (Deceased) Versus Anup Chadha High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
17-01-2020 Rajinder Prasad Aggarwal Versus Dr. Anil Kumar Narang High Court of Delhi
17-01-2020 Oriental Insurance Company Ltd, Orissa Versus Achhey Lal High Court of Chhattisgarh
16-01-2020 Rattan Lal Bharadwaj Versus Magma Financial Corporation Ltd. & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
09-01-2020 Janardan Narsingh Mahajan Versus Messers Makhija Vohra Builders High Court of Judicature at Bombay
08-01-2020 Shyam Lal Jayaswal Versus Branch Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Limited & Another Supreme Court of India
06-01-2020 Vipin Agarwal V/S Satyaprakash Aggarwal & Others National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
06-01-2020 M/s. Prime Gold International Limited, Represented by its Director Achin Aggarwal & Another Versus The Additional Director General, The Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence Coimbatore Zonal Unit, Coimbatore & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-01-2020 Udhav Lal Versus State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Police Station Sarangarh High Court of Chhattisgarh
03-01-2020 State Bank of India V/S Nand Lal Sokhal and Others. Debts Recovery Tribunal Jaipur
02-01-2020 Manori Lal & Another Versus State of U.P. & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
20-12-2019 Ram Babu Aggarwal Versus State & Another High Court of Delhi
17-12-2019 Gopal Aggarwal Versus Metro Motors & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
17-12-2019 Gopal Aggarwal Versus M/s. Metro Motors & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
16-12-2019 Souhrada Charitable Club, Represented by Its President, Akhil Augustine & Another Versus The Union of India, Represented by The Secretary To Government, The Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change, New Delhi & Others High Court of Kerala
10-12-2019 BMW India Private Limited Versus Mukul Aggarwal & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
06-12-2019 Manik Lal Das Versus The State of West Bengal & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
04-12-2019 State of Punjab Versus Kashmiri Lal @ Sheera High Court of Punjab and Haryana
29-11-2019 Chumman Lal Sahu & Another Versus Gopal Ji Singh & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
21-11-2019 Sham Lal Chabba Versus Om Prakash & Others High Court of Himachal Pradesh
21-11-2019 Sree Sankara Vidyapeetom College, Represented by the Principal, Ernakulam & Another Versus P.K. Akhil & Others High Court of Kerala
20-11-2019 Chaitu Lal Versus State of Uttarakhand Supreme Court of India
19-11-2019 Akhil Dev @ Chandroose Versus State of Kerala, Represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam High Court of Kerala
15-11-2019 Municipal Corpn. Of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) Versus Abhilash Lal & Others Supreme Court of India