w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Parvaiz Ahmad Parry v/s State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others


Company & Directors' Information:- PARRY AND COMPANY LIMITED [Dissolved] CIN = U65991TN1928PLC001985

Company & Directors' Information:- KASHMIR CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U15410JK2013PTC003982

    Civil Appeal No. 13368 of 2015 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 26131 of 2013)

    Decided On, 06 November 2015

    At, Supreme Court of India

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE

   



Judgment Text

Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal is filed against the final judgment and order dated 10.05.2013 passed by the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir at Jammu in L.P.A. No. 102 of 2012 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant herein while upholding the judgment dated 12.11.2012 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court in SWP No. 2699 of 2010.

3. In order to appreciate the issues involved in the appeal, which lie in a narrow compass, few relevant facts need mention infra.

4. The appellant completed B.Sc. with Forestry as one of the major subjects from Garhwal University, Uttarakhand in the year 2001. Thereafter he also completed his M.Sc.(Forestry) from the same University in the year 2003.

5. The appellant also passed the National Eligibility Test (NET) in Forestry from Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) in the year 2005-2006.

6. The J & K Forest Service (Gazetted) Recruitment Rules, 1970 (in short ‘the Rules’) lays down the eligibility qualifications for the post of Range Officer Grade-I (Forest) which is 'B.Sc. Forestry or its equivalent from any University recognized by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research'.

7. The Indian Council of Forest Research & Education (in short 'ICFRE') issued Notification dated 15.01.1999 clarifying that the syllabus of State Forest Service (in short ‘SFS’) Colleges was very much akin to that of Indira Gandhi National Forest Academy (in Short 'IGNFA'), therefore, considering the high standard of training and education in the SFS Colleges, the ICFRE resolved that 'SFS College Diploma to be treated as equivalent to M.Sc.(Forestry).'

8. By letter dated 15.02.2007, the Forest Research Institute (in short ‘FRI’) informed the Department of Forest, J & K Government, that the SFS Colleges Diploma be treated as equivalent to M.Sc. (Forestry). In turn, on 12.03.2007, the Forest Department informed the same to the J.K. Public Service Commission (JKPSC) endorsing the opinion of the FRI dated 15.02.2007.

9. By Notification dated 20.07.2007, the JKPSC advertised 23 posts of J & K Forest Service Range Officers Grade-I (Forest) and invited applications from the eligible candidates. The eligibility qualification mentioned in the Notification was 'B.Sc.(Forestry) or equivalent from any University recognized by the ICAR'. The appointment to the post was to be made on the basis of written test, viva-voce test, walking test and medical test. The appellant applied for the said post.

10. By Notification dated 08.09.2010, the JKPSC declared the appellant as an ineligible candidate for appointment to the post of Range Officer Grade-I(Forest) on the ground that he does not possess the prescribed qualification.

11. On 07.10.2010, the appellant sent a representation to the JKPSC to re-consider his case as according to him, he possessed the qualification prescribed for the post. On 11.10.2010, the appellant sent another representation to the JKPSC requesting it to allow him to participate in the selection. Since no action was taken on the representation, the appellant filed a petition being SWP No. 2699 of 2010 before the High Court for issuance of writ of certiorari for quashing the said notification dated 08.09.2010 and for further direction to the JKPSC to allow him to participate in the selection process.

12. The learned Single Judge, by interim order dated 24.11.2010, allowed the appellant to appear in the written examination subject to the outcome of the writ petition. Accordingly, the appellant appeared in the examination.

13. On 22.02.2011, the result of the written examination was produced in the Court by the JKPSC, which declared the appellant as successful. The learned Single Judge permitted the appellant to appear in the interview.

14. On 22.07.2011, the JKPSC published a list of selected candidates who were recommended for appointment on the basis of merit but the list did not reflect the name of the appellant.

15. By order dated 12.11.2012, the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition.

16. Against by the said order, the appellant preferred an appeal being L.P.A. No. 102 of 2012 before the High Court. Pending disposal of the appeal, the Division Bench, by interim order dated 22.11.2012, directed that one post of Range Officer Grade-I (Forest) be reserved for the appellant. However, by order dated 10.05.2013, the Division Bench dismissed the appeal.

17. Aggrieved by the said judgment, the appellant preferred this appeal by way of special leave before this Court.

18. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

19. Learned Counsel for the appellant while assailing the legality and correctness of the impugned judgment made two submissions. In the first place, he contended that the writ court and the appellate court erred in dismissing the appellant's writ petition and the appeal. It was his submission that the reasoning of the writ court, which was simply upheld by the appellate Court without examining the real issue, is wholly perverse and being unsustainable in law deserves to be set aside. In the second place, learned counsel contended that when admittedly the appellant was having B.Sc. degree in Forestry as one of the major subjects and further he had also obtained Masters degree in Forestry, M.Sc.(Forestry), and later acquired higher qualification of Masters degree, i.e., M.Sc. in Natural Resources and Environment from the University of Michigan, USA, he should have been held as an eligible candidate for the post of J & K Forest Service Range Officers Grade-I for which he had applied pursuant to the advertisement.

20. In reply, learned counsel for the respondents supported the impugned judgment and contended that no case is made out to interfere in the impugned order and hence the appeal should be dismissed.

21. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record of the case, we find force in the submissions urged by the learned counsel for the appellant.

22. As would be clear from the undisputed facts mentioned above, the minimum qualification prescribed for applying to the post of J & K Forest Service Range Officers Grade-I was "B.Sc. (Forestry) or equivalent from any University recognized by ICAR". It is not disputed that the appellant was to his credit a qualification of B.Sc. with Forestry as one of the major subjects and Masters in Forestry, i.e. M.Sc.(Forestry), on the date when he applied for the post in question, which satisfied the eligibility criteria so far as the qualification was concerned.

23. We do not agree with the reasoning of the High Court that in order to be an eligible candidate, the appellant should have done B.Sc. in Forestry and since he had not done so, he was not considered as an eligible candidate. This reasoning, in our view, does not stand to any logic and is, therefore, not acceptable insofar as the facts of this case are concerned.

24. In our considered view, firstly, if there was any ambiguity or vagueness noticed in prescribing the qualification in the advertisement, then it should have been clarified by the authority concerned in the advertisement itself. Secondly, if it was not clarified, then benefit should have been given to the candidate rather than to the respondents. Thirdly, even assuming that there was no ambiguity or/and any vagueness yet we find that the appellant was admittedly having B.Sc. degree with Forestry as one of the major subjects in his graduation and further he was also having Masters degree in Forestry, i.e., M.Sc.(Forestry). In the light of these facts, we are of the view that the appellant was possessed of the prescribed qualification to apply for the post in question and his application could not have been rejected treating him to be an ineligible candidate for not possessing prescribed qualification.

25. In our view, if a candidate has done B.Sc. in Forestry as one of the major subjects and has also done Masters in the Forestry, i.e., M.Sc.(Forestry) then in the absence of any clarification on such issue, the candidate possessing such higher qualification has to be held to possess the required qualification to apply for the post. In fact, acquiring higher qualification in the prescribed subject i.e. Forestry was sufficient to hold that the appellant had possessed the prescribed qualification. It was coupled with the fact that Forestry was one of the appellant’s major subjects in graduation, due to which he was able to do his Masters in Forestry.

26. Learned counsel for the respondents contended that if the appellant is held eligible on the basis of his qualification, the candidates alike him would be deprived of applying for the said post. The argument, in our view, has no merit.

27. In the first place, no such candidate or/and applied for the post and secondly,

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

the argument being wholly hypothical in nature cannot be accepted. 28. In the light of foregoing discussion, we are not in agreement with the view taken by the High Court when it was held that the appellant did not possess the prescribed qualification. This finding, as held above, is unsustainable and thus cannot be upheld. The appeal thus succeeds and is accordingly allowed. Impugned order is set aside. As a consequence, the writ petition filed by the appellant succeeds and is accordingly allowed. Since the appellant has already cleared the written examination and had appeared in the interview and further one post was directed to be kept reserved for him by the orders of the High Court in the event, the appellant succeeds in this litigation, we consider it appropriate to direct the respondents to issue necessary appointment order in favour of the appellant for the said post after ensuring compliance of the procedural formalities within one month from the date of receipt of this judgment.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

05-05-2020 Bhanumathy Usha & Others Versus The Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd., Thiruvananthapuram Branch, Represented by Its, Branch Head Susil Kaloor & Others High Court of Kerala
16-04-2020 In Re: Court on Its Own Motion Versus Union Territories of Jammu & Kashmir & Ladakh through Secretaries, Social Welfare Department High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
03-04-2020 Azra Usmail & Another Versus Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
03-04-2020 Azra Usmail & Another Versus Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir Rajasthan Revenue Board
24-03-2020 Azra Usmail & Another Versus Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
20-03-2020 Azra Usmail & Another Versus Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
28-02-2020 Trans Asian Industries Exposition Pvt. Ltd. & Others Versus Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd & Another High Court of Delhi
06-02-2020 Rafiq Ahmad Wani & Others Versus Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd. & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
14-01-2020 Ircon International Limited Versus Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
14-01-2020 Managing Director, Jammu & Kashmir Housing Board & Another Versus Amarjeet Kaur & Another High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
14-01-2020 Sonia Sharma Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
03-12-2019 Meena Sharma Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others Supreme Court of India
05-09-2019 The Management of Shekkalmudi Estate, M/s. Parry Agro Industries Limited, Murugali Bazaar (P), Valparai, Coimbatore DT, Represented by its Assistant General Manager P & IR Versus The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Coimbatore High Court of Judicature at Madras
07-06-2019 Sarwan Singh Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
07-06-2019 Hilal Ahmad Laway Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
03-06-2019 Mohammad Shafi Shaikh Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
29-05-2019 Vikas Nissar Ganai Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
28-05-2019 Narinder Kour & Others Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
17-05-2019 Sham Lal & Another Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
13-05-2019 Irshad Ahmad Reshi Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir, Through Sho P/S Sumbal Sonawari, Bandipora High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
08-05-2019 Abdul Rehman Mir & Another Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
07-05-2019 Haji Lal Hussain Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Another High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
06-05-2019 Ghulam Mohudin Lone Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
02-05-2019 The State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others Versus Farid Ahmad Tak Supreme Court of India
01-05-2019 Jehangir Bashir Sathoo Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
05-04-2019 State of Jammu & Kashmir Versus Ram Bahadur High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
18-03-2019 J.P. World School & Others Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
01-03-2019 State of Jammu & Kashmir Versus Sheelo Devi High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
26-02-2019 Suhail Ahmad Dar Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
21-02-2019 EID Parry (India) Limited, Chennai Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Assistant Commissioner (CT), Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
31-01-2019 State of Jammu & Kashmir Versus Ravi Kumar & Another High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
28-01-2019 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Cochin Versus Parry Agro Industries Ltd., W. Island, Kochi High Court of Kerala
28-01-2019 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Cochin Versus Parry Agro Industries Ltd., W. Island, Kochi High Court of Kerala
22-01-2019 Rakesh Bakshi & Others Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others Supreme Court of India
28-12-2018 Suresh Singh Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
26-12-2018 Zuber Ahmed Chandel Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
14-11-2018 Vijay Kumar Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir Supreme Court of India
30-10-2018 J.S. Luthra Academy & Another Versus State of Jammu and Kashmir & Others Supreme Court of India
12-07-2018 Balwant Singh Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
09-07-2018 Mohd. Akhtar Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir Supreme Court of India
03-07-2018 Angat Kumar Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Another High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
02-07-2018 Manzoor Ahmad Bhat Versus Chief Engineer, Kashmir & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
08-06-2018 CCE, Jammu & Kashmir V/S Jindal Drugs Limited Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal Chandigarh Bench
23-05-2018 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Cochin Versus Parry Agro Industries Ltd., Kochi High Court of Kerala
23-05-2018 Vinod Kumar Jain and Others. V/S C.C.E. & S.T.-Jammu & Kashmir and Others. Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
15-05-2018 Khurshid Ahmed Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir Supreme Court of India
27-04-2018 Akbar Hussain Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Another Supreme Court of India
16-04-2018 Mohd. Akhtar Versus The State of Jammu & Kashmir Supreme Court of India
12-04-2018 Neeru Gupta Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Another High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
06-03-2018 Vijay Gupta & Another Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Another High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
27-02-2018 Saraswati Agro Chemicals India Ltd V/S CCE, Jammu & Kashmir Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal Chandigarh Bench
21-11-2017 State of Jammu & Kashmir Versus Mohammad Mehraj-Ud-Din Khan & Others Supreme Court of India
14-11-2017 EID Parry India Ltd V/S CCE & ST, LTU, Chennai Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal South Zonal Bench At Chennai
26-10-2017 Sunaina Sharma & Others Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others Supreme Court of India
15-09-2017 EID Parry (India) Ltd V/S CCE & ST, LTU Chennai Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal South Zonal Bench At Chennai
14-09-2017 M/s. E.I.D. Parry (India) Limited, Rep by its Sr. AVP ? Legal, Biswa Mohan Rath Versus Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation & Distribution Company (TANGEDCO), Rep by its Chairman & Managing Director & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
18-08-2017 State of Jammu & Kashmir Versus M/s. Trikuta Roller Flour Mills Pvt. Ltd. & Others Supreme Court of India
19-07-2017 M/s. Hotel Tramboo Continental Versus Home Department Civil Secretariat Govt. of Jammu & Kashmir & Others Supreme Court of India
18-07-2017 Kashmir Ayurvedic Works Versus The Director Ayurveda, Yoga & Naturopathy Another High Court of Punjab and Haryana
13-07-2017 Vinod Kumar Khajuria & Another Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others Supreme Court of India
05-07-2017 EID Parry (India) Ltd V/S CCE, Tiruchirappalli Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal South Zonal Bench At Chennai
17-04-2017 Kashmir Singh Versus Mohd. Siddiq Khan High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
09-03-2017 Jammu & Kashmir State Power Development Corporation Versus KJMC Global Market (India) Limited High Court of Delhi
09-03-2017 Varinder Singh Chandel Versus Kashmir Singh Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Shimla
06-03-2017 State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others Versus Suraj Singh High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
28-02-2017 The National Insurance Co. Ltd., Chennai & Another Versus New Kashmir Arts & Crafts, Rep. by its Partner M. Abdul Majeed Khan & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
22-02-2017 State of Jammu & Kashmir, Through Commissioner/Secretary to Government, Srinagar & Others Versus M/s National India Construction Company, Engineers & Contractors, Through its partner, Sanjeev Singh High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
08-02-2017 Jagdish Raj & Others Versus Jammu & Kashmir Special Tribunal & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
07-02-2017 State of Jammu & Kashmir Versus Harvinder Singh High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
17-01-2017 M/s. Prabhat General Agencies & Others Versus The Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd. High Court of Judicature at Bombay
08-12-2016 State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others Versus District Bar Association, Bandipora Supreme Court of India
21-10-2016 State of Jammu and Kashmir Versus Vichar Kranti International & Another Supreme Court of India
20-09-2016 Joint Committee of Private Schools, Srinagar Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
14-07-2016 Dr. Renu Gupta Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir thr. Commissioner/Secretary to Government & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
12-07-2016 Kashmir Singh Versus State of H.P. & Others High Court of Himachal Pradesh
17-05-2016 Kashmir Singh alias Sodhi Versus State of HP High Court of Himachal Pradesh
28-04-2016 Satish Singh & Another Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
23-04-2016 Kashmir Kaur & Others Versus Sunita Rani & Another High Court of Punjab and Haryana
18-04-2016 M/s.S.L. Telecom & Others Versus Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd. High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
12-04-2016 Munshi Ram & Another Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
11-04-2016 Bachan Lal Kalgotra Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir, Through Secretary to the Ministry of Home Affairs Govt, of Jammu & Kashmir High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
17-03-2016 Ravinder Kumar Sharma Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Another High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
17-03-2016 State of Jammu and Kashmir Through the Conservator of Forests Versus M/s R.B. Jodha Mal & Co.(Pvt) Ltd., Through Sh. Joginder Lal Kuthiala, Managing Director, Canal Road, Jammu, near Toph Bridge & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
16-03-2016 Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd., Jammu Versus Tania Jamwal & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
16-03-2016 Radhey Sham Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
09-03-2016 Surinder Singh & Others Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir Through Chief Secretary, Civil Secretariat & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
02-03-2016 Santosh & Another Versus The State of Jammu & Kashmir, Through Chief Secretary, Government of Jammu & Kashmir & Another High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
26-02-2016 Shabir Ahmed Versus State of Jammu and Kashmir & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
11-02-2016 Sham Singh Versus Kashmir Kaur & Another High Court of Punjab and Haryana
01-01-2016 Naresh Kumar Jain Versus State of Jammu and Kashmir through its Chief Secretary, Civil Secretariat Srinagar & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
05-12-2015 Kashmir Kaur Versus Sukhdev Singh High Court of Punjab and Haryana
30-11-2015 Muhammad Faisal Qureshi & Others Versus State of Jammu and Kashmir through its Chief Secretary Civil Secretariat Srinagar & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
06-11-2015 Kartar Singh (deceased) through LRs Versus Kashmir Singh & Others High Court of Punjab and Haryana
29-10-2015 Mst. Syeda Begum Versus State of Jammu and Kashmir through Commissioner/Secretary to Govt. Revenue Department, Civil Secretariat Srinagar/Jammu & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
16-10-2015 Parimoksh Seth & Another Versus State of Jammu and Kashmir & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
15-10-2015 Sher-e-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences Soura, Srinagar through its Director & Another Versus Dr. Mushtaq Ahmad Laway & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
14-10-2015 Jammu & Kashmir Peoples Forum through its Secretary General M.M. Shuja Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir through Secretary to Govt. Law & Parliamentary Affairs Department High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
08-10-2015 State of Jammu & Kashmir Versus R.K. Zalpuri & Others Supreme Court of India
30-07-2015 State of Jammu & Kashmir through Principal Secretary to Government (Home Department), & Others Versus Sajad Ahmad Dar High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
16-07-2015 Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd Versus Saroj Kumari & Others Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Delhi


LawyerServices is a Premium Legal Tech solution.


Lawyers, Law Firms, Government Departments and Corporates rely on us for, Workflow Automation, Data Aggregation, Timely Updates, Case Management, Intelligent Research, Latest Legal Data Updates and a LOT more!

If you are a legal professional, CONTACT US, in order to see how our UNIQUE solution can benefit your organization.

Features Intro Close Box