w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



New Nagpur Mahila Gramin Vikas Credit Co-Operative Society Ltd. & Another v/s Suman Balaji Thakre


Company & Directors' Information:- TO THE NEW PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72900DL2006PTC235208

Company & Directors' Information:- BALAJI CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45400MH2008PTC178324

Company & Directors' Information:- CO-OPERATIVE COMPANY LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51226DL1910PLC299886

Company & Directors' Information:- CO-OPERATIVE COMPANY LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51226UP1910PLC000093

Company & Directors' Information:- R G CREDIT PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U65992WB1992PTC056496

Company & Directors' Information:- A P CREDIT PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U65993WB1993PTC060229

Company & Directors' Information:- M B CREDIT PVT LTD [Amalgamated] CIN = U67190WB1990PTC048536

Company & Directors' Information:- H S CREDIT PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74899DL1991PTC044366

Company & Directors' Information:- S M CREDIT CO PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U67120WB1969PTC027496

Company & Directors' Information:- NEW BALAJI & CO. PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999UP2008PTC035478

Company & Directors' Information:- VIKAS R & D INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U73100DL2012PTC232875

Company & Directors' Information:- OPERATIVE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74300KA2008FTC048079

Company & Directors' Information:- BALAJI PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U25190MH2011PTC225580

Company & Directors' Information:- NEW INDIA CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U36999TN1940PTC001776

Company & Directors' Information:- VIKAS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U99999MH1949PTC007334

    Revision Petition No. 2540 of 2015

    Decided On, 09 July 2020

    At, National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

    By, THE HONOURABLE DR. S.M. KANTIKAR
    By, PRESIDING MEMBER

    For the Petitioners: Joharpurkar, A.P. Adhe, Advocates. For the Respondent: Nitin Bargat, Advocate.



Judgment Text


1. The present Revision Petition has been filed by the New Nagpur Mahila Gramin Vikas Credit Co-operative Society ( Petitioner-1/ OP- 1 herein after referred to as “Society”) and the manager of Society (Petitioner-2/ OP-2) being aggrieved by the order passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra, Circuit Bench, Nagpur (hereinafter referred to as “State Commission”) which had decided the First Appeal No. 13/2014 in favor of the complainant Suman Balaji Thakre (hereinafter referred to as “Respondent/Complainant), who was original complainant before the Additional Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Nagpur (hereinafter referred to as “District Forum”).

2. Brief facts that, the Complainant/Respondent Suman B. Thakre deposited Rs.1,00,000/- for a period of one year from 27.12.2005 to 27.12.2006 with OP-1 Society. It was to be repaid with interest at the rate of 12% per annum. However, the Manager of the society, Deorao Shyamrao Gharjale (OP-2) did not repay the amount with interest. The OPs did not pay heed to the legal notice from the complainant, therefore the complainant filed a Consumer Complaint in the District Forum against the OPs and prayed to repay Rs. 1,00,000/- with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from 27.12.2005 and also to pay her compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- with cost of the complaint.

3. The OPs resisted the Complaint by filing their common written version. The preliminary objection was that the Complaint was barred by limitation. The OPs admitted the deposit and it was to be repaid with interest at the rate of 12% per annum. It was further submitted that the complainant lost her original fixed deposit receipt (FDR) and on her application dated 28.10.2006, the society issued a duplicate FDR. The complainant surrendered the said duplicate receipt and the society refunded Rs. 1,00,000/- after adjusting her loan of Rs.78,800/- taken from the Society and paid the interest and balance amount in cash to her. Hence prayed for the dismissal of the complaint on this ground.

4. The District Forum, on hearing the parties and considering the evidence on record, held the OPs liable by partly allowing the complaint. It directed the OPs to refund Rs. 1,00,000/- with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from 27.12.2005 till realization of the actual amount and also to pay her compensation of Rs.10,000/- for harassment and cost of Rs.2,000/-.

The District Forum observed as below:

As the Non- applicants have not refunded the amount to the Complainant after maturity of fixed deposit, the Forum is of clear view that Complainant is ‘consumer’ of Non- applicants. So also the act of Non- applicants to retain the amount for a long period after maturity and not to return the amount to the Complainant in time shows deficiency in service. Hence, Forum is of clear view that complaint of Complainant can be admitted.

5. Aggrieved by this Order, the Petitioners - OPs filed First Appeal No. FA/13/14 before the State Commission.

1. The State Commission dismissed the Appeal with following observation:

9. It is thus not disputed that the respondent deposited with the Appellant Rs.1,00,000/- initially for the one year from 27.12.2005 to 26.12.2006 and it was to be repaid with interest at the rate of 12%p. a . It is the case of the appellant that the it paid monthly interest over the said amount to the respondent and lastly and on the request of the respondent loan of Rs.78,800/- was advanced to her and on her request the said amount of loan was adjusted in her loan fixed deposit amount and balance amount out of Rs.1,00,000/- was paid to her and accordingly her signature was obtained on duplicate fixed deposit receipt.

10. However we find that fixed deposit receipt does not show that the interest was to be paid monthly the respondent. It is also not the case of the appellants that they paid monthly interest over Rs.1, 00,000/- as per request of the respondent. In our view when the respondent made no request for payment of monthly interest to her over Rs.1,00,000/-, it cannot be believed that the appellants paid monthly interest over Rs.1,00,000/- from time to time to the respondent.

11. Moreover we also find that there is no application from the respondent praying to pay her loan of Rs.78,800/-. In the absence of any such application in regular form from the respondent it cannot be believed that the respondent had demanded loan of Rs.78,800/-from the appellants and that accordingly the said loan was paid to her by the appellant. It is the case of the appellants that loan of Rs.78,800/- was obtained by the respondent from the appellant for the payment of the same to the husband of the appellant No.2 as he was admitted in hospital for treatment and as he is the brother of the respondent. The said fact cannot be believed when it is not explained by the appellant No 2 that she was not having money to meet the expenses required for treatment of her husband. Therefore on this ground also it can not be believed that respondent had demanded loan of Rs.78,800/- and it was paid to her by the appellants.

12. It is also pertinent to note that though the appellants alleged that vouchers and duplicate fixed deposit receipt bear signatures of the respondent, but those signatures are denied by the respondent as belonging to her. The appellants have not referred those documents to hand writing expert to seek his opinion about those signatures. Moreover perusal of the copies of the said documents and Forum after considering the same has rightly held that those documents are not reliable. Thus under these facts and circumstances we hold that simply by producing those documents it cannot be proved they bear the signatures of the respondent and that the amounts mentioned on those vouchers and duplicate deposit receipts were actually paid by the Appellant to the Respondent.

13. The copies of cash book produced by the Appellant showing payment of interest, loan and balance money to the respondent also cannot be believed since those accounts are not duly audited and since they do not bear signatures of Account Officer and entry of said cash book are not supported by cogent and reliable documents.

7. Hence, the present revision petition.

8. Counsel for both the sides made oral arguments. I have perused the material on record.

9. I find the Order of the State Commission to be well-appraised and well-reasoned. The State Commission concurred with the findings of the District Forum. Within the meaning and scope of section 21(b), I find no grave error in appreciating the evidence by the two fora below, as may cause

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

to require re-appreciation of the evidence in revision. I note in particular the extracts of the respective observations made by the two fora quoted, verbatim, in paras 4 and 6 above. I find the award made by the District Forum (quoted in para 4 above), and as affirmed by the State Commission, to be just and appropriate. And, on the face of it, I find no jurisdictional error, or a legal principle ignored, or miscarriage of justice. 10. The revision petition, being misconceived and devoid of merit, is dismissed. 11. Needless to add that the District Forum shall undertake execution as per the law. 12. A copy each of this Order be sent to the District Forum and to the complainant by the Registry within ten days.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

06-10-2020 Rikhab Jain Versus M/S. Trackon Couriers Private Limited, New Delhi & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
05-10-2020 T.K. David Versus Kuruppampady Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. & Others Supreme Court of India
05-10-2020 Tarun Kanti Chowdhury & Others Versus Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
01-10-2020 M/s. Harihar Buildspace Pvt. Ltd. G-III, Amar Palace, Panchsheel Square, Dhantoli, Nagpur Versus Union of India Through its Chief Secretary, Ministry of Power, Shramshakti Bhavan, New Delhi & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
01-10-2020 R. Krishnaraj Versus The Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Cuddalore & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-10-2020 Construction Industry Development Council, New Delhi Versus Arjun Singh & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
01-10-2020 Bayer New Zealand Limited Versus Ministry For Primary Industries Court of Appeal of New Zealand
01-10-2020 M. Meenachi Muppidathi Versus The Government of India, Representing by The Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi & Another Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
01-10-2020 M. Meenachi Muppidathi Versus The Government of India, Representing by The Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi & Another Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
01-10-2020 Ujwala Prasad & Others Versus New India Assurance Company Ltd., Rep. by Division Manager & Others High Court of Karnataka
01-10-2020 Ujwala Prasad & Others Versus New India Assurance Company Ltd., Rep. by Division Manager & Others High Court of Karnataka
30-09-2020 Lalatendu Nayak & Another Versus Supertech Ltd., New Delhi National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
30-09-2020 M/s. Taneja Developers & Infrastructure Ltd., New Delhi Versus Col. B.S. Goraya National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
30-09-2020 Pavai Varam Educational Trust, Established & Namakkal Represented by Chairman, V. Natarajan Versus The Pharmacy Council of India, Represented by the Secretary Cum Registrar, New Delhi High Court of Judicature at Madras
28-09-2020 S.M. Balaji & Another Versus State represented by the Inspector of Police, CCB, Cyber Crime Cell, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
25-09-2020 Rhonpal Biotech Pvt. Ltd. Versus New Delhi Municipal Council & Others High Court of Delhi
23-09-2020 C.M. Gadha & Another Versus Bar Council of India, New Delhi, Rep. by Its Secretary & Others High Court of Kerala
22-09-2020 Gramin Yuvak Vikas Shikshan Mandal, Kinhi Naik & Another Versus Shivnarayan Datta Raut & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
22-09-2020 The Visnagar Taluka Co-Operative Purchase & Sales Union Limited (Deleted) Versus District Registrar, Co-Op. Societies High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
21-09-2020 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Versus & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
21-09-2020 New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Represented by its Divisional Manager Versus Shanthamma & Another High Court of Karnataka
21-09-2020 Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi Versus M/s. Guptasons Jewellers & Gems Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
21-09-2020 Tvl. Transtonnelstroy Afcons Joint Venture, Represented by its Authorised Signatory, Chennai Versus Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
17-09-2020 Katherine Anne Starr Phillips Versus New Zealand Police Court of Appeal of New Zealand
17-09-2020 Advocate Thoufeek Ahamed Versus Union of India, Represented by Secretary (Justice), Ministry of Law & Justice, New Delhi & Another High Court of Kerala
15-09-2020 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Represented by its Manager Versus Girija & Another High Court of Karnataka
15-09-2020 United India Insurance Company Ltd., Through The Regional Manager, New Delhi Versus Dinesh Vijay National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
14-09-2020 Tuticorin Stevedores' Association, Rep.by its Secretary, Tuticorin Versus The Government of India, Rep.by its Secretary, Ministry of Shipping, New Delhi & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
14-09-2020 Dr. Varghese Perayil Versus The Election Commission of India, New Delhi, Rep. by Its Secretary & Others High Court of Kerala
10-09-2020 Raina Begum Versus The Union of India Rep. By The Comm & Secy. to The Govt. of India, Home Deptt., New Delhi-01, India & Others High Court of Gauhati
09-09-2020 Oriental College of Teacher Education, Represented by Its Manager, Calicut Versus The Regional Director, National Council for Teacher Education, New Delhi High Court of Kerala
08-09-2020 The Dental Council of India, Aiwan-E-Galib Marg, New Delhi Versus PSR Lakhmi Bhuvaneshwari Preethi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
08-09-2020 The Branch Manager, The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Karaikudi Versus Rani & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
08-09-2020 S. Jagannatha Rao Versus Air India Limited, Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
07-09-2020 District Co-Operative Bank Ltd. Durga Branch, Varanasi, Through Its Branch Manager & Another Versus Leelawati Devi & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
07-09-2020 Badri Narayan Singh & Another Versus The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) Government of India, through the Home Secretary North Block, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Patna
07-09-2020 Bitu Yadav @ Vikas Yadav Versus State (NCT of Delhi) & Another High Court of Delhi
07-09-2020 The New India Assurance Company Limited Versus Somwati & Others Supreme Court of India
03-09-2020 B. Rajesh & Another Versus Union of India, Rep. by its Ministry of Corporate Affairs, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-09-2020 Hyundai Motor India Ltd., New Delhi Versus Harshad Ramji Chauhan & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
01-09-2020 M/s Elgi Equipments Ltd., Rep.by its company Secretary, S. Raveendar, Coimbatore Versus M/s Kurichi New Town Development Authority Rep.by its Member Secretary, Kurichi, Coimbatore & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-09-2020 M. Mangalasamy Versus The Registrar of Co-operative Societies (Housing), Nandanam, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-09-2020 Pavai Varam Educational Trust Established and Administering, Paavai College of Pharmacy and Research, Rep. by Chairman V. Natarajan Versus The Pharmacy Council of India, Represented by the Secretary cum Registrar, New Delhi High Court of Judicature at Madras
31-08-2020 New Negendra Lorry Transport Versus M/s. Telangana Foods a Government of Telangana Enterprises & Another High Court of for the State of Telangana
31-08-2020 M/s. Omaxe Limited, New Delhi & Another Versus Divya Karun & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
28-08-2020 Inter Gold India Pvt. Ltd., Maharashtra & Another Versus New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Maharashtra National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
28-08-2020 M/s Urban Systems Versus The Union of India Rep. By The Secretary To The Govt of India, Min of Finance, Deptt of Revenue Central Board of Indirect Taxes And Customs, North Block, New Delhi & Others High Court of Gauhati
26-08-2020 Vikas Gupta Versus State & Others High Court of Delhi
26-08-2020 Karvy Stock Broking Limited, Represented by its Vicepresident (Legal) Ch. Viswanath Versus The Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, New Delhi & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
26-08-2020 Davinder Nath Sethi & Another Versus M/s. Purearth Infrastructure Limited, New Delhi National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
26-08-2020 New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Delhi Versus Maninderjeet Singh Khera National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
25-08-2020 Gopal Krishna Mishra Versus State of Chhattisgarh through The Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare Development, Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
25-08-2020 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Branch Office, Villupuram Versus J. Manimaran & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
24-08-2020 Sanjay Nayyar Versus State of NCT Delhi, New Delhi & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
24-08-2020 United India Insurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi Versus Singhla Engineers & Contractors Pvt. Ltd. & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
24-08-2020 R.K. Dawra Versus Union of India, Through Secretary Ministry of Communication, Department of Telecommunication, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh Bench
21-08-2020 Pankaj Chaudhary, HCS, Special Secretary, Public Health Engineer Department Versus Union of India, through its Secretary, Department of Personnel & Training, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh Bench
21-08-2020 Dr. Parimal Roy, Working as Director, Indian Council of Agricultural Research NIVEDI Versus The President, Indian Council of Agricultural Research Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Bangalore Bench
19-08-2020 V.K. Somarajan Pillai Versus Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to Govt. of India, Department of Posts, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Ernakulam Bench
19-08-2020 Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., New Delhi Versus Adv. Shiji Joseph & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
19-08-2020 Babubhai Bhagvanji Tandel Versus New India Assurance Company Ltd., Maharashtra National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
19-08-2020 Vijay Cotton & Fibre Co., Maharashtra Versus New India Insurance Company Ltd., Maharashtra & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-08-2020 The Registrar (Judicial), High Court of Judicature of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad Versus The Union of India, The Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
18-08-2020 Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi Versus Astha Cement Pvt. Ltd. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
17-08-2020 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Chhattisgarh & Another Versus Astu Ram & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
17-08-2020 New India Assurance Company Ltd., New Delhi Versus Shailendra Prasad Singh National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
14-08-2020 T.V. Maniyappan & Another Versus Pattanakkad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Rep. by Its Secretary & Others High Court of Kerala
14-08-2020 Kasmikoya Biyyammabiyoda & Others Versus Union of India, Represented by Home Secretary, Secretariat, Government of India, New Delhi & Others High Court of Kerala
13-08-2020 Brahmaputra Infrastructure Ltd, New Delhi & Another Versus State of Bihar & Another High Court of Judicature at Patna
12-08-2020 Krishnamoorthy & Another Versus Chengalvarayan Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd., Periyasevalai, Rep. by its Special Officer & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
12-08-2020 Scott Christian College, Rep.by its Correspondent S. Byju Nizeth Paaul Versus The Member Secretary, All India Council for Technical Education, New Delhi & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
12-08-2020 Abdul Saleem Pattakal & Another Versus The Director General Bureau of Civil Aviation Security, A-Wing, New Delhi & Others High Court of Kerala
10-08-2020 Maranalloor Milk Producers Co. Operative Society Ltd. Represented by Its Secretary, Thiruvananthapuram & Others Versus The Registrar /Director, Directorate of Dairy Development, Pattom & Others High Court of Kerala
10-08-2020 Sri Kalakuteers Apartment Flat Owners Maintenance Mutually Aided Co-operative Society Limited, rep. by its Chief Promoter & Another Versus The State of Telangana, rep. by its Prl. Secretary Cooperation Dept., Secretariat, Hyd. & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
10-08-2020 Vipin K. Hari & Another Versus The Joint Registrar of Co-Operative Societies (General), Thrissur & Others High Court of Kerala
07-08-2020 Surender Singh Dahiya, Additional Director, Agriculture Department, Government of Haryana (Panchkula) Versus Union of India, through Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions, Department of Personnel & Training, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh Bench
07-08-2020 Citibank N.A., New Delhi Versus Deepanshu Kumar & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
07-08-2020 The Commissioner of Income Tax-V, New Delhi Versus M/s. Nalwa Investment Ltd. & Others High Court of Delhi
07-08-2020 M/s. B & B Growing, New Delhi & Another Versus Capital Co-Op. Group Housing Society Ltd., Delhi & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
06-08-2020 New India Assurance Company Ltd., Divisional Office, Kottayam, Rep. by The Manager Versus O.S. Varghese & Others High Court of Kerala
06-08-2020 Rajiv Bal Versus Harrison Industries, New Delhi & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
06-08-2020 Peter & Others Versus Union of India, Represented by Its Secretary, Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change, New Delhi & Others High Court of Kerala
04-08-2020 Union of India, Rep by its Secretary to the Government, Department of Home Affairs, New Delhi & Others Versus Siva Lakshmi High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-08-2020 The Managing Committee, (Under Order of Suspension), The Vellathooval Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Represented by Its President Versus The Joint Registrar of Co-Operative Societies (General), Office of The Joint Registrar of Co-Operative Societies (General), Idukki & Others High Court of Kerala
04-08-2020 M/s. Pioneer Power Ltd, Rep. by its Chief General Manager, Therkukattur Village, Ramanathapuram Versus Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, New Delhi & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
04-08-2020 Regional Manager, Bajaj Allianz General Ins. Co. Ltd., New Delhi & Another Versus Capt. Bibhuti Mohan Jha National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
04-08-2020 P. Anil Kumar @ Chempazhanthi Anil & Others Versus The Indian Red Cross Society, Represented by Its Secretary General, National IRCS, New Delhi & Others High Court of Kerala
31-07-2020 National Insurance Co. Ltd. Through Rajesh Kumar Dy. Manager, New Delhi Versus Biking Food Products (P) Ltd., Telangana National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
31-07-2020 New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Thru. Manager Versus Dr. Vikas Sethi & Others High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
30-07-2020 C.R. Mahesh Versus Union of India, Represented by The Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi & Others High Court of Kerala
30-07-2020 Som Nath Bhatt Versus Central Provident Fund Commissioner, New Delhi & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
30-07-2020 Som Nath Bhatt Versus Central Provident Fund Commissioner, New Delhi & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
30-07-2020 Jalgaon Golden Transport Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Union of India, Through its Secretary, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food & Public Distribution, New Delhi & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
29-07-2020 New Aadinath Plywood & Hardware Through Its Proprietor, Shri Sanjay, M.P. Versus Nandini Photo Studio, M.P. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
29-07-2020 The Karassery Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Kozhikode, Represented by Its General Manager Versus State of Kerala, Represented by Secretary, Department of Co-Operative Societies, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram & Others High Court of Kerala
28-07-2020 Dr. Uma Suresh Versus The Authorised Officer, The National Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Bangalore & Others High Court of Karnataka
28-07-2020 N. Madhavan Versus Union of India Rep. by its Secretary, Department of Financial Services, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-07-2020 Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Through Its Duly Constituted Attorney, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi Versus Vikash Kumar National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
27-07-2020 Amar Chand Singh Versus C.B.I. Thru. Director, New Delhi & Others High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
24-07-2020 Hindustan Insecticides Ltd., Through Its Authorized Representative, New Delhi Versus Thakar & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC