At, Supreme Court of India
By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA
For the Applicants: Maninder Singh, ASG., D.L. Chidananda, Meenakshi Grover, Nalin K., Prabhas Bajaj, D.S. Mahra, Raju Ramchandran, Sr. Advocate, Anitha Shenoy, Mythili, Advocates. For the Respondents: Anand Grover, Sr. Advocate, Anil Shrivastav, Anip Sachthey, Jugal Kishore Gilda, Aniruddha P. Mayee, A. Selvin Raja, Sapam Biswajit Meitei, Linthoingambi Thongam, Naresh Kumar, I.H. Issac H., Ashok Kumar Singh, B. Balaji, D.S. Mahra, Gopal Singh, Rituraj Biswas, Vimla Sinha, Jogy Scaria, Mishra Saurabh, P.V. Yogeswaran, Rahul Kaushik, Bhuvneshwari Pathak, Shilpi Satya Priya Satyam, Devender Kr. Saini, Sanjay Kumar Visen, Mrs. Kirti Renu Mishra, Sudarshan Singh Rawat, Sunil Fernandes, V.G. Pragasam, Prabu Ramasubramanian, V.N. Raghupathy, Parikshit P. Angadi, Aruna Mathur, Avneesh Arputham, Yusuf Khan, Anuradha Arputham, M/s. Arputham Aruna & Co., Asha Gopalan Nair, Navnit Kumar, M/s Corporate Law Group, K.V. Jagdishvaran, G. Indira, Ashok Kumar Juneja, Chand Qureshi, Hemantika Wahi, K. Enatoli Sema, Edward Belho, Amit Kumar Singh, K. Luikang Michael, Suryanarayana Singh, Pragati Neekhra, S. Pathak, Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, S.S. Shamshery, Amit Sharma, Prateek Yadav, Ruchi Kohli, Soumik Ghosal, Parijat Sinha, Tripti Tandon, Amritananda Chakravorty, Purushottam Sharma Tripathi, Mukesh Kumar Singh, Ravi Chandra Prakash, Advocates.
It is stated by Mr. Maninder Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General, that in this application, clarification is sought to the effect that the judgment dated 15.04.2014 related to only transgender, i.e., those commonly known as Hijras/Eunuchs and did not include Gay, Lesbian or Bisexual.2. No such clarification was needed as this aspect is amply clarified in paragraphs 107 and 109 and other parts of the judgment.3. The Int
Please Login To View The Full Judgment!
erlocutory Application stands disposed of.