w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



National Lawyers' Campaign for Judicial Transparency & Reforms Represented by its Secretary A.C. Philip & Others v/s Union of India & Another


Company & Directors' Information:- THE INDIA COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999TN1919PTC000911

Company & Directors' Information:- A.C. AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17290PB2013PTC037435

Company & Directors' Information:- INDIA CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65990MH1941PTC003461

Company & Directors' Information:- PHILIP & CO LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U36900WB1930PLC019108

Company & Directors' Information:- NATIONAL UNION CORPN PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U51909WB1940PTC010240

Company & Directors' Information:- NATIONAL UNION LTD [Not available for efiling] CIN = U74999KL1951PLC000818

    Review Petition (Civil) No…………………./2019 (Diary No. 29668 of 2018) In Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1303 of 1987

    Decided On, 17 October 2019

    At, Supreme Court of India

    By, THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. RANJAN GOGOI
    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE
    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA
    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA
    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
    By, THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI
    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT
    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN

   



Judgment Text

Permission to file the review petition is granted.

Prayer for open Court hearing is rejected.

There is an inordinate delay of 9071 days in filing the instant petition, for which no satisfactory explanation has been offered by the petitioners.

Thus, though the present petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay itself, yet we have carefully gone through the review petition and the papers connected therewith. We are satisfied that no case for review of the impugned judgment has been made out.

The review petition is according

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

ly dismissed, both on the ground of delay, as well as, on merits.
O R