w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



National Engineering Industries Ltd. v/s Cimmco Birla Ltd.


Company & Directors' Information:- CIMMCO LIMITED [Active] CIN = L28910WB1943PLC168801

Company & Directors' Information:- BIRLA CORPORATION LIMITED [Active] CIN = L01132WB1919PLC003334

Company & Directors' Information:- NATIONAL ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29130WB1946PLC013643

Company & Directors' Information:- D ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29269TZ1932PTC000046

Company & Directors' Information:- NATIONAL CO LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U51909WB1917PLC002781

Company & Directors' Information:- L & V ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45202MZ2005PTC007690

Company & Directors' Information:- NATIONAL CORPORATION PVT LTD [Not available for efiling] CIN = U51909PB1942PTC000480

Company & Directors' Information:- K INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U99999KA1946PTC000938

Company & Directors' Information:- IN ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74210DL2011PTC212284

Company & Directors' Information:- THE ENGINEERING CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U99999KA1951PTC000699

Company & Directors' Information:- INDUSTRIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U00349KA1947PTC000501

Company & Directors' Information:- J INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U18101OR1960PTC000388

    Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 151 of 2018

    Decided On, 30 May 2018

    At, National Company Law Appellate Tribunal

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. MUKHOPADHAYA
    By, CHAIRPERSON & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BANSI LAL BHAT
    By, JUDICIAL MEMBER

    For the Appellant: Ajit Sharma, Asheesh Jain, Adnan Siddiqui, Mayank Aggarwal, Advocates. For the Respondent: Ved Jain, Pranjal Srivastava, Advocates.



Judgment Text

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson

1. This appeal(s) has been preferred under section 61(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the 'I&B Code') against order dated 11th March, 2010 and 28th July, 2016 passed by the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, New Delhi (for short, 'BIFR') referred to as the BIFR Case No. 372 of 2000.

2. The appeal(s) has been preferred in view of Notification No. S.O. 1683 (E) dated 24th May, 2017, issued by the Central Government whereby and whereunder 'The Eighth Schedule' of the I&B Code has been amended and the order passed by the BIFR has been ordered to be treated an order passed by the Adjudicating Authority under Section 31(1) of the I&B Code and thereby preferred appeal within 90 days before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT).

3. The aforesaid Notification No. S.O. 1683 (E) dated 24th May, 2017 fell for consideration before this Appellate Tribunal in the ' Principal Director General of Income Tax (Admn. & TPS) vs. M/s. Spartek Ceramics India Ltd. & anr.' -'Company Appeal (AT) (insolvency) No. 160 of 2017 and analogous case. In the aforesaid appeals, this Appellate Tribunal by judgment dated 28th May, 2018 while pointed out the infirmity in the Notification No. S.O. 1683 (E) dated 24th May, 2017 held that :

"44. If the intention of the legislature/Parliament substituting sub-clause (b) of Section 4 (by Eighth Schedule) is looked into, we find that the executive instruction issued by the Central Government under Section 242 is contrary to the provisions of sub-clause (b) of Section 4 of the 'SICA Repeal Act, 2003'.

45. In view of the aforesaid discussion, we find that the grounds shown by the Central Government in Notification S.O. 1683(E) dated 24th May, 2017 for exercising powers conferred under Section 242 are in conflict with the amended sub-clause (b) of Section 4 of the 'SICA Repeal Act, 2003'.

xx xx xx xx

50. From the aforesaid provision, it is clear that the grounds to prefer appeal under Section 61 of the 'I&B Code' against an order of approval of plan passed by the Adjudicating Authority under Section 31, should be such as mentioned in subsection (3) of Section 61. As per sub-section (2) of Section 61, the appeal is required to be filed within thirty days before the NCLAT. The Appellate Tribunal is empowered to condone the delay of 'another fifteen days' after the expiry of the period of thirty days in preferring the appeal that too for sufficient cause. It has no power to condone the delay if appeal under Section 61 is preferred beyond fifteen days from the date of the expiry of the period of thirty days. Meaning thereby, no appeal under sub-section (1) of Section 61 can be entertained after forty-five days of knowledge of the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority.

51. The impugned Notification S.O. 1683(E) dated 24th May, 2017 was notified after five months twenty seven days of enactment of the 'I&B Code' (came into force from 1st December, 2016). All Schemes have been framed by the Board prior to 1st December, 2016 i.e. before coming into force of the 'I&B Code' i.e. much more than five months twenty-seven days back (177 days).

52. The limitation of thirty days has been prescribed under sub-section (2) of Section 61 for preferring an appeal against an order passed by the Adjudicating Authority, including the order passed under section 31(1) of the 'I&B Code'. The Appellate Tribunal for sufficient cause can condone the delay but such period cannot exceed fifteen days. Therefore, no appeal can be entertained after forty-five days of knowledge of order. The Central Government, thereby cannot grant ninety days' period to prefer an appeal under section 61(1), which is contrary to Section 61(2) of the 'I&B Code'.

53. The 'difficulty' as contemplated under Section 242 of the 'I&B Code' has not been mentioned by the Central Government in the notification in question. The Central Government in exercise of its powers conferred under Section 242, is competent to make provision to remove the difficulty in giving effect to the provisions of the 'I&B Code', but it cannot be in conflict with nor can change the substantive provisions of the 'I&B Code'. The period of limitation as prescribed by Notification S.O. 1683(E) dated 24th May, 2017 being in conflict with the maximum period of limitation granted under sub-section (2) of Section 61 of the 'I&B Code' and beyond forty-five days, the NCLAT having not empowered to entertain the appeal. The NCLAT has no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal under Section 61 beyond the period of forty-five days.

54. The NCLAT, having been empowered by the Parliament to hear the appeal under provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, 'I&B Code, 2016' and the Competition Act, 2003, the Central Government cannot empower the Appellate Tribunal to hear an appeal pursuant to Notification S.O. 1683(E) dated 24th May, 2017.

55. For the reasons aforesaid, we hold that both the appeals preferred by 'Pr. Director General of Income Tax (Admn. & TPS)' and 'GMB Ceramics India Ltd. & Ors.' against the Scheme framed by the Board are barred by limitation and otherwise not maintainable under Section 61 of the 'I&B Code'.

4. In view of the aforesaid finding, we hold that the present appeal under Section 61(1) is not maintainable and otherwise also barred by limitation prescribed under sub-section (2) of Section 61.

5. However, this Appellate Tribunal to maintain judicial decorum in 'Principal Director General of Income Tax (Admn. & TPS) (Supra) observed as follows :

"57. To maintain the judicial decorum, though we have noticed the conflict in the order passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi and the Notification S.O. 1683(E) dated 24th May, 2017, we refrain from giving any specific declaration about the same.

In spite of observations as made above, the next question requires consideration is that if otherwise the appeals are maintainable the impugned Scheme is legal or not."

6. While so observing, this Appellate Tribunal had also gone into the merits of the appeals.

7. Though we are not supposed to decide the merit of the appeal(s), but if the arguments of the appellant is accepted, we find that there are infirmity in the scheme in question :

(i) The Scheme was framed without notice to the appellant - unsecured creditor.

(ii) The Scheme which is deemed to be a 'Resolution Plan' is in contravention of Section 30(2)(e) of the I&B Code i.e. not in accordance with the provisions of law time being in force. For example, if there is a material irregularity in exercising of the powers by the 'Insolvency Resolution Professional' during the 'corporate insolvency resolution process; whether 'debts' owed to the 'Operational Creditor' is to be provided in the 'Resolution Plan'. It has not been decided nor the 'scheme' complies with the guidelines prescribed in the 'Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India' and the provisions of the 'I&B Code'.

(iii) The 'Committee of Creditors' are supposed to approve the 'Resolution Plan' and the 'Resolution Applicant' is supposed to pay the dues but no such provision has been made in the scheme.

(iv) The 'Resolution Plan' contravenes the provisions of the Income-tax Act, as alleged by the Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax-7. Thus, if the impugned Schemes are treated to be approved (Resolution Plan) under sub-section (1) of Section 31 of the 'I & B Code' they being against the provisions of the existing laws and being in violative of clause (e) of sub-section (2) of Section 30 of the I&a

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

mp;B Code are illegal. 8. Though, we find that the impugned Schemes dated 11th March, 2010 and 28th July, 2016 are illegal, however, in absence of our jurisdiction to exercise of powers under Section 61 of the 'I&B Code' and appeals being barred by limitation, we are not interfering with the illegal Schemes dated 11th March, 2010 and 28th July, 2016 though we hold them as illegal. 9. Further, in absence of any provision to get the Schemes in question executed through any court of Competent jurisdiction, the relevant provision(s) having been repealed, the appellant(s) may raise the question, if the respondent(s) move before any court of Law for implementation of the Schemes. 10. Both the appeal(s) are disposed of with aforesaid observations. However, in the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

25-06-2020 M/s. Goodwill Leather Art Rep By its Prop Md Quddus ALi Alias Md Quddus Ali Molla Versus National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
23-06-2020 Rohini Gogoi (Under Suspension) Versus State of Assam Rep. by the Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Public Health Engineering Deptt. High Court of Gauhati
19-06-2020 Vipin Kumar Choudhary Versus Makhan Lal Chaturvedi National University Of Journalism & Communication - Bhopal National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
19-06-2020 Ram Avtar Versus National Insurance Co. Ltd. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-06-2020 Rajendra Singh & Others Versus National Insurance Company Limited & Others Supreme Court of India
17-06-2020 S. Selvam Versus The Senior Manager – HRD Air India Limited, (Now known as National Aviation Company of India Limited), Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
17-06-2020 D.D. Industries Ltd., New Delhi Versus Jasmeet Walia & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
15-06-2020 Piara Ram Versus National Insurance Co. Ltd. Through Its Manager, Punjab National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
09-06-2020 State rep. by the Drugs Inspector, O/o. Director of Drugs Control, Tamil Nadu, Chennai Versus M/s. National Pharmaceuticals [A-3], A Division of Rider Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by Kamalchand Jain, Director & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
09-06-2020 Rakesh Malhotra Versus Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Others High Court of Delhi
09-06-2020 Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. Versus Principal, College of Engineering, Pune High Court of Judicature at Bombay
03-06-2020 Bhubaneshwar Expressways Pvt. Ltd. Versus National Highways Authority of India High Court of Delhi
01-06-2020 Khaleed Pasha & Others Versus State of Karnataka, Represented by its Secretary Department of Commerce & Industries (MSME, Mines & Textile), Bangalore & Others High Court of Karnataka
01-06-2020 Aditya Birla Money Limited, Rep. By its Head – Legal & Compliance, L.R. Murali Krishnan Versus The National Stock Exchange of India Limited, Investors Services Cell, Kotturpuram & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-05-2020 Gautam Navlakha Versus National Investigation Agency & Another High Court of Delhi
26-05-2020 Tips Industries Ltd. Versus Entertainment Network (Kindia) Ltd. & Another High Court of Judicature at Bombay
26-05-2020 Guru Nanak Industries, Faridabad & Another Versus Amar Singh (Dead) Through Lrs. Supreme Court of India
26-05-2020 Dr. Divyesh J. Pathak & Others Versus National Board of Examinations & Another High Court of Delhi
22-05-2020 Patel Engineering Ltd. Versus North Eastern Electric Power Corporation Ltd. (Neepco) Supreme Court of India
20-05-2020 M/s. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, Represented by its Authorised Signatory, Nilesh Mahendra Kumar Gandhi & Another Versus The Assistant Commercial Tax Officer (Check of Accounts) & Others High Court of Andhra Pradesh
15-05-2020 Mohet Hojai Versus National Investigation Agency Supreme Court of India
13-05-2020 Jayanta Sarkar Versus National Jute Board & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
12-05-2020 Spentex Industries Ltd Versus Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP High Court of Delhi
11-05-2020 South East Asia Marine Engineering & Constructions Ltd. (Seamec Ltd.) Versus Oil India Limited Supreme Court of India
11-05-2020 Posco Engineering & Construction India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Sinew Developers Pvt. Ltd. Supreme Court of India
06-05-2020 Punjab National Bank & Others Versus Atmanand Singh & Others Supreme Court of India
04-05-2020 Priyambada Devi Birla & Birla Corporation Ltd. Versus Arvind Kumar Newar & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
30-04-2020 Natural Sugar and Allied Industries Limited & Others Versus The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary for Co-operation, Marketing & Textile Department, Mantralaya & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
27-04-2020 Bihar State Electricity Board & Others Versus M/s. Iceberg Industries Ltd. & Others Supreme Court of India
27-04-2020 Dr. Devyesh J. Pathak & Others Versus National Board of Examination & Others High Court of Delhi
24-04-2020 Union of India & Others Versus Exide Industries Limited & Another Supreme Court of India
22-04-2020 National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Versus S.A. Alimenta Supreme Court of India
07-04-2020 (The State) The National Investigation Agency, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, Represented by the Superintendent of Police, Assam Versus Akhil Gogoi High Court of Gauhati
23-03-2020 The Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Limited, Sikkim Versus Bishal Chettri & Another High Court of Sikkim
20-03-2020 M/s. CJP Industries, Represented by its Managing Partner S. Julius Versus Amitha Bishnoi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
18-03-2020 Abhighyan Bhattacharya & Another Versus School Of Engineering & Technology & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-03-2020 M/s. COPCO Engineering Pvt. Ltd., Rep.by its Managing Director K. George Versus Southern Railway, Office of the Chief Administrative Officer (Construction), Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
18-03-2020 West Bengal Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd. & Others Versus M/s. Sona Promoters Pvt. Ltd. & Others Supreme Court of India
17-03-2020 A Marine Industries Munambam, Ernakulam, Represented by Its Proprietor, P.T. Francis & Others Versus UCO Bank, Represented by The Chief Manager, Ernakulam & Another High Court of Kerala
17-03-2020 M/s. Rite Choice Foundations and Engineering Pvt. Ltd., Rep., by its Managing Director, C.K. Sridhar Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep., by its Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
17-03-2020 S. Vaikundarajan Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep., by its Principal Secretary to Government, Industries (MMD.2) Department, Chennai Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
16-03-2020 Peps Industries Private Limited Versus Kurlon Limited High Court of Delhi
13-03-2020 The National Insurance Co. Ltd., Kolkata, through its Regional Manager Versus Marotrao & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
13-03-2020 The Branch Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus Suchandra Basak West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
12-03-2020 Sai Electromech Industries, A Sole Proprietary Concern rep.by Its Proprietor Umangkumar Joshi Versus Sicagen India Limited, Rep.by its Authorised Signatory S. Mahadevan High Court of Judicature at Madras
12-03-2020 M/s. National Insurance Co. Ltd., Puducherry Versus Rani & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
12-03-2020 The Branch Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus Subhash Mahanta West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
12-03-2020 National Insurance Co. Ltd., National Legal Vertical (Legal Cell), New Delhi Versus Biswadeb Koley & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
11-03-2020 M/s. National Insurance Co. Ltd., Basheerbagh, Hyderabad through local branch at Khammam Versus F.R. Phillip High Court of for the State of Telangana
11-03-2020 Agrocel Industries Pvt. Ltd. Versus United India Insurance Company Ltd. High Court of Judicature at Bombay
10-03-2020 National Company, Represented by its Managing Director, Dr. Arun A Raja Versus Joint Chief Controller of Explosives Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Petroleum & Explosives Safety Organization (PESO), (Formerly Department of Explosives), Egmore, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
10-03-2020 S. Nijam Ali @ Nijam Versus Union of India, Rep. by the Addl. Superintendent of Police, National Investigation Agency, Kochi Branch High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-03-2020 National Insurance Co. Ltd., Rajasthan & Another Versus Bhawal Synthetics India Ltd., Rajasthan & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
06-03-2020 Indian Oil Corporation Limited. Versus TOYO Engineering Corporation & Another High Court of Delhi
06-03-2020 M/s. Connectwell Industries Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India Through Ministry of Finance & Others Supreme Court of India
06-03-2020 Pankaj Kumar Singh Versus National Thermal Power Corp Ltd. & Others High Court of Madhya Pradesh
06-03-2020 Mumtaz & Others Versus The National Insurance Co. Ltd., & Another High Court of Karnataka
05-03-2020 UCO Bank Versus National Textile Corporation Limited & Another Supreme Court of India
05-03-2020 Dr.(Mrs) Sania Akhtar, Working as Principal Director (Senior Principal Scientist), Central Institute of Plastics Engineering & Technology SARP, Bangalore Versus The Director General, Central Institute of Plastics Engineering & Technology, Ministry of Chemical & Fertilizers, Guindy, Chennai & Another Central Administrative Tribunal Bangalore Bench
05-03-2020 National Insurance Co. Ltd., Chennai Versus S. Chitirai Pandian & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
05-03-2020 Electrosteel Steels Limited, Bokaro & Others Versus The State of Jharkhand through Secretary, Department of Industries, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi & Others High Court of Jharkhand
05-03-2020 Gunjan Kumar Versus Management of Circle Head Punjab National Bank, Darbhanga & Others High Court of Judicature at Patna
04-03-2020 The National Council of Women in India, Tamil Nadu Branch, Represented by its President, Chennai Versus Arulmighu Kapaleeswarar Koil, Represented by its Joint Commissioner, Executive Officer, Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-03-2020 M/s. Ramco Industries Ltd., Rajapalaym Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Madurai High Court of Judicature at Madras
03-03-2020 In The Matter of: Punjab National Bank, NOIDA Uttar Pradesh Versus State Bank of India Sam Brnach, New Delhi (Branch Code-04109), New Delhi & Others National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
02-03-2020 G.T.P. Transport Company, Swaranpuri, Salem & Another Versus National Insurance Company Ltd., Divisional Manager, Salem & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
02-03-2020 M/s. Project Engineering Corporation Limited, Ernakulam, Represented by Manager (Administrations) Binu Jacob Versus M/s. Doshion Private Ltd., Ahmedabad, Represented by Its Director, Rakshit Doshi High Court of Kerala
02-03-2020 Branch Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd., Represented by Regional Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd., Bengaluru Versus Latha & Others High Court of Karnataka
28-02-2020 Trans Asian Industries Exposition Pvt. Ltd. & Others Versus Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd & Another High Court of Delhi
28-02-2020 M/s. Techno Global Services Pvt. Ltd. & Another Versus National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Others West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
28-02-2020 Super Cassettes Industries Pvt. Ltd Versus Prime Cable Network & Another High Court of Delhi
27-02-2020 National Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus Bhagwan Bhika Shirsath & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
27-02-2020 Taraknath College of Education Versus National Council For Teacher Education & Another High Court of Delhi
26-02-2020 Punjab National Bank Versus M/s Vindhya Cereals Pvt. Ltd. National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
25-02-2020 Eurotex Industries and Exports Ltd. Versus Additional Commissioner of Labour-cum-Specified Authority & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
25-02-2020 Kamal Encon Industries Limited Through its Authorized Representative Versus Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission Through its Secretary World Trade Centre, Mumbai & Others Appellate Tribunal for Electricity Appellate Jurisdiction
24-02-2020 Panch Tatva Promoters Pvt. Ltd. Versus GPT Steel Industries Ltd. (Through Resolution Professional) & Others National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
24-02-2020 S. Suresh Versus The Management Exide Industries Ltd., Madurai & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
20-02-2020 Asian Food Industries Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
19-02-2020 The National Textile Corporation Ltd. & Another Versus Modified voluntary Retirement Scheme of 2002 of Azam Jahi Mill Workers Association & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
19-02-2020 M.I.E.T. Engineering College, Rep. by its Chairman, Er.A. Mohamed Yunus, Trichy & Others Versus The Registrar, Anna University of Technology, Guindy & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-02-2020 M/s. Pankaj Trading Company Proprietor Mr. Manoj Jain & Others Versus National Insurance Company Ltd. Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-02-2020 National Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus Manjulaben Jayantibhai Usadadiya High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
18-02-2020 Clay Craft (India) Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Director, Rajasthan & Others Versus Rajasthan Small Industries Corporation Limited (Institution of Rajasthan Government) Through Managing Director, Ugyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
17-02-2020 National Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus Veena Jain Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission New Delhi
17-02-2020 Reliance Industries Ltd. Versus Gail (India) Ltd. High Court of Delhi
17-02-2020 Nileshbhai Arvindbhai Gandhi, Director, Cube Construction Engineering Limited Versus State of Gujarat & Another High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
14-02-2020 The Superintending Engineer, General Construction, TANTRANSCO Ltd., Tatabad, Coimbatore & Another Versus Micro Small Enterprises Facilitation Council and Director of Industries and Commerce, Represented by its Chairman, Guindy & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
14-02-2020 National Insurance Company Ltd. Through Its Duly Constituted Attorney Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd., New Delhi Versus M/s. Ganpati Timber Store, By Proprietor Sh. Rajesh Khadariya & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
13-02-2020 The Project Director, National Highways Authority of India, Madurai Versus M. Vijayalakshmi & Another Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
13-02-2020 Daniel Oommen Versus National Institute of Technology, Kozhikode, Represented by Its Registrar & Others High Court of Kerala
13-02-2020 In The Matter of: National Building Construction Corporation Ltd [Presently NBCC (India) Limited] V/S M/s. J R Construction High Court of Delhi
12-02-2020 Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus National Bulk Handling Corporation Pvt. Ltd. Supreme Court of India
10-02-2020 M/s. JV Engineering Associate, Civil Engineering Contractors, Represented by its Partner, S. Jaikumar Versus General Manager, CORE, Allahabad, Represented by Deputy Chief Engineer, Railway Electrification, Chennai, Egmore High Court of Judicature at Madras
10-02-2020 V. Vennila Versus The Executive Engineering Transmission Line Construction/ Tamilnadu Transmission Corporation Ltd. (TANTRANSCO), Thanjavur District & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
10-02-2020 M/s. Tanfac Industries Limited, Rep. by its Secretary G. Balasubramanian Versus M/s. Orichem Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
10-02-2020 Punjab National Bank V/S Sri Vaishnodevi Cashew Processing (P) Ltd. and Others. Debts Recovery Tribunal Cuttack
07-02-2020 National Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus Gowriyammal & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
07-02-2020 Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited V/S Laxmi Balaji Industries and Others. Debts Recovery Tribunal Hyderabad
07-02-2020 Punjab National Bank V/S Biswajit Dhar and Others. Debts Recovery Tribunal Kolkata


LawyerServices is a Premium Legal Tech solution.


Lawyers, Law Firms, Government Departments and Corporates rely on us for, Workflow Automation, Data Aggregation, Timely Updates, Case Management, Intelligent Research, Latest Legal Data Updates and a LOT more!

If you are a legal professional, CONTACT US, in order to see how our UNIQUE solution can benefit your organization.

Features Intro Close Box