w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



M/s. Urban Umbrella Development And Management Company Through Its Proprietor/Authorized Signatory, Punjab V/S Pawan Lal & Others


Company & Directors' Information:- S. M. MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74140AS2005PTC007642

Company & Directors' Information:- URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45400MH2011PTC300616

Company & Directors' Information:- URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45400WB2011PTC166069

Company & Directors' Information:- UMBRELLA CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15134MH2012PTC232149

Company & Directors' Information:- C & K MANAGEMENT LIMITED [Active] CIN = U91990TG2000PLC033293

Company & Directors' Information:- S M MANAGEMENT PVT LTD [Not available for efiling] CIN = U74140WB1992PTC002848

Company & Directors' Information:- S M MANAGEMENT PVT LTD [Not available for efiling] CIN = U74140WB1992PTC057260

Company & Directors' Information:- C. LAL LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909HR2012PLC046499

Company & Directors' Information:- W P MANAGEMENT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U40100TG2016PTC112006

Company & Directors' Information:- S R MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74140MH2000PTC129839

Company & Directors' Information:- R K URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45400MH2011PTC223591

Company & Directors' Information:- V M G MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74140WB2011PTC160061

Company & Directors' Information:- M B MANAGEMENT PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U99999MH1981PTC025914

Company & Directors' Information:- A. B. URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U70100MH2015PTC267677

Company & Directors' Information:- W P MANAGEMENT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45201TG2016PTC112006

Company & Directors' Information:- I & J MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U93000DL2016PTC292375

Company & Directors' Information:- H AND S MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74140KL2005PTC018253

    Revision Petition Nos. 495, 496 of 2017

    Decided On, 27 January 2020

    At, National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

    By, THE HONORABLE JUSTICE: V.K. JAIN
    By, PRESIDING MEMBER

    For the Appearing Parties: Krishna Dev J., Piyush Sharma, Rakesh Mohan Dutta, Advocates



Judgment Text


Oral:

The complainants/respondents booked plots with the respondent UK Homes Pvt. Ltd. in a project namely 'Capital Greens' at Zirakpur, Patiala Highway and made payment against the allotted plots to the said Company namely UK Homes Pvt. Ltd. The petitioner herein namely Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company entered into an MoU dated 13.01.2015 with UK Homes Pvt. Ltd., after the said project had been got approved by UK Homes Pvt. Ltd. From PUDA, expressing its interest to undertake the entire project including complete land rights with sale, marketing, execution of agreements to sale and development of plots/units till possession. The petitioner/appellant Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company was to pay a total sum of Rs.39 crores in terms of the said MoU. The payment was to be made in the following manner:-

'Sl. No.

Particulars

Amount(INR)

1.

Amount mentioned in Annexure E

7,78,750

2.

On signing of this MoU

10,00,000

3.

On 15 February, 2015

15,00,000

4.

On 15 April, 2015

50,00,000

5.

From 15 July, 2015 till 15 June, 2016

- Rs. 10 lac each month for 12 months.

1,20,00,000

6.

On 15 August, 2016

50,00,000

7.

From 15 October, 2016 till 15 March, 2017 – Rs. 20 lac each month for 06 months

1,20,00,000

8.

On 15 April, 2017 – Rs. (8,77,00,000 – 3,72,78,750

4,74,21,250

9.

For LOI Approval charges

30,00,000

TOTAL PAYMENT TO FIRST PARTY

8,77,00,000

10.

To land owners (as per annexure D of this MoU)

29,31,76,250

11.

To Land Registration Cost, as applicable

91,23,750

TOTAL SALE CONSIDERATION AMOUNT (RUPEES THIRTY NINE CRORES ONLY)

39,00,00,000

12.

On Retention by Each Existing Client i.e. 75 Intending Allotee =Rs. (75X50000)

37,50,000'


2. Clause 3, 4, 6 and 9 of the MoU read as under:-

'3) That the FIRST PARTY till date has already executed Agreement to Sell & Purchase for Residential unit(s)/plot(s) in the said PROJECT with its customers, hereinafter referred to as Intending Allottee(s), and has received payments from those customers/intending Allottee(s) as detailed in 'Annexure-C' of this MoU.

4) That the SECOND PARTY will adjust these Intending Allottee(s), as mentioned in the 'Annexure-C' of this MoU, in case any of these intending Allottee(s) wish to retain/buy plot(s)/unit(s) in the said PROJECT, subject to the condition that their prevailing plot/unit rate(s), Basic Sale Price (BSP), in the Agreement to Sell with the FIRST PARTY should not be less than Rs. 12,000/- psy (Rupees Twelve Thousand only per sq. yard) and also subject to the availability of plot(s)/unit(s) in the said PROJECT.

6) That the SECOND PARTY will have the rights to execute a fresh Agreement to Sell & Purchase with these Intending allottee(s) who wish to retain their Unit(s)/Plot(s). And will receive the balance payment from them, as and when demanded as per their new payment terms and conditions in the Agreement to Sell & Purchase executed with the SECOND PARTY.

9) That the sale amount received by the FIRST PARTY from those Intending Allottee(s) as mentioned in 'Annexure-C' of this MoU, who do not wish to retain their Plots/Units in the said PROJECT, then it will the Sole responsibility of the FIRST PARTY to either refund them or adjust that amount in any of their (FIRST PARTY) other Projects. Under no circumstances the SECOND PARTY will be responsible for the amount received from those intending Allottee(s), as mentioned in Annexure-C’ of this MoU, who do not wish to retain their Plots/Units in the said PROJECT.'

3. No fresh agreements were executed by the Complainants with Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company and no payment was made by them to the afore-said firm. Since the plots allotted to them by UK Homes Pvt. Ltd. were not developed, the Complainants approached the concerned District Forum/State Commission by way of separate complaints. In two cases the complaints were instituted before the District Forum whereas in one case the complaint was instituted before the State Commission. The complainants sought refund of the amount which they had paid for the plots along with interest, compensation etc.4. The complaints were resisted both by UK Homes Pvt. Ltd. and Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company. As noted by the State Commission it was stated in the written version filed by UK Homes Pvt. Ltd. that no assured allotment had been made by them and the Complainant was only an investor. The said written version, it is informed, was filed only in Consumer Complaint subject matter of FA No. 760/2016. The complaint was resisted by the petitioner/appellant Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company primarily on the ground that there was no privity of contract between them and the complainants and in terms of the MoU, it was for UK Homes Pvt. Ltd. to refund the amount received from such allottees who did not switch over to them and did not execute agreements with them.

5. The consumer complaints having been allowed by the District Forum in Revision Petition No. 495 and 496 of 2017, the petitioner approached the concerned State Commission by way of an appeal. The said appeals having been dismissed the aforesaid petitioner is before this Commission by way of Revision Petitions No. 495 and 496 of 2017. The consumer complaint subject matter of FA No. 760 of 2016 having been allowed by the State Commission against the appellant herein namely Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company as well as UK Homes Pvt. Ltd., the afore-said firm is before this Commission by way of FA No. 760 of 2016.

6. It is an admitted position that no payment whatsoever was made by any of these complainants to Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company. It is also an undisputed position that none of them executed any agreement with Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company in terms of clause 6 of the MoU. It is evident from a bare perusal of clause 4 of the MoU that the Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company was required to adjust the persons to whom allotment was made by UK Homes Pvt. Ltd. in case any of them wished to retain the plots subject to the condition that the price in that case was not to be less than Rs.12,000/- per sq. yd. and such adjustment was to be subject to the availability of the plots/units in the afore-said project. The total number of the allottees who were to be adjusted by Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company was not to exceed 75 and for every allottee retaining their plot/unit with Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company a sum of Rs.50,000/- was to be paid to UK Homes Pvt. Ltd. It is also evident from clause 9 of the MoU that if an allottee did not wish to retain plot/unit in the project with Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company, the refund to such allottee was to be made by UK Homes Pvt. Ltd. and not by Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company. It was expressly made clear in clause 9 of the MoU that under no circumstance Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company will be responsible for the amount received from such allottees who did not wish to retain their plots/units in the project.

7. Even as per annexure B to the MoU, if any allottee to whom allotment was made by UK Homes Pvt. Ltd. wanted to retain his plot/unit, the amount which UK Homes Pvt. Ltd. received from such an allottee was to be adjusted in the payment which Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company had to make to UK Homes Pvt. Ltd. by 15.084.2017 and in that case, the amount paid by the allottee retaining the plot/unit in the project was to be taken as the payment made by Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company to UK Homes Pvt. Ltd.

8. Since the allottees did not write to Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company seeking to retain their allotment on the terms and conditions mentioned in the MoU, it is only UK Homes Pvt. Ltd. which remained liable to make refund of the amount which it had received from them along-with appropriate interest/compensation and no such liability can be imposed upon Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company particularly in view of clause 9 of the MoU executed on 13.01.2015.

9. The learned Counsel for the Complainant has drawn my attention to clause 15 of the MoU which reads as under:-

'That complete sale process, w.e.f. date of Signing of this MoU by both the Parties, for the Plot(s)/Unit(s) in the said PROJECT including Agreement/Sale documents and payments collection will be executed sole by the SECOND PARTY. Under no circumstances, the FIRST PARTY will be able to sell and/or execute any documents pertaining to the Sale of the Plot(s)/Unit(s) in the said PROJECT directly to any third party, without the written consent from the SECOND PARTY.'

The aforesaid clause, in my opinion, is wholly irrelevant for the purpose of deciding these matters since the said Clause deals with the completion of the project but obviously would apply only in respect of those allottees who switch over to Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company in terms of clause 14(I4) of the MoU and not to the allottees who did not switched over to Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company and the entire payment by whom was made only to UK Homes Pvt. Ltd. In fact, even UK Homes Pvt. Ltd. did not claim in its written version filed before the State Commission that it was the obligation of Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company to refund the amount which UK Homes Pvt. Ltd. had received from the Complainants. In fact, in an affidavit dated 17.084.2015 Mr. Udai Raj Singh Brar, Director of UK Homes Pvt. Ltd. has clearly stated that any amount received by the Company UK Homes Pvt. Ltd. jfrom any party/individual against the booking/sale etc. of any part/unit/plot in the project Capital Greens will be the responsibility of UK Homes Pvt. Ltd. including refund etc., and under no circumstance Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company or its assignees or employees will have any responsibility for the refund of the said amount.

10. It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the complainants that after executing MoU with UK Homes Pvt. Ltd., Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company did not write any letters to the complainants informing them of the execution of the MoU and giving them an option to switch over to Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company in terms of the MoU executed between the parties. However, no such obligation on Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company is found in the MoU. Primarily, it was for UK Homes Pvt. Ltd., the s

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

aid company having collected money from the complainants to inform the allottees of the said MoU and given them an opportunity to switch over to Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company in terms of the MoU executed between Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company and UK Homes Pvt. Ltd. No doubt UK Homes Pvt. Ltd. could not have compelled the allottees to switch over to Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company on the terms and conditions agreed between Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company and UK Homes Pvt. Ltd., but then if such terms and conditions were not acceptable to the allotees, the appropriate course of action for them was to take recourse to legal proceedings against UK Homes Pvt. Ltd., the said company having taken money and having made allotment to them. 11. For the reasons stated, hereinabove, the impugned orders to the extent Urban Umbrella Development and Management Company has also been directed to refund the amount which UK Homes Pvt. Ltd. received from the Complainants cannot be sustained and to this extent the impugned order is set aside. However, the impugned orders to the extent they are directed against UK Homes Pvt. Ltd. and its Directors remained unaltered. The appeal and the revision petitions stand disposed of accordingly.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

29-09-2020 Laddu Lal Mahto Versus Managing Director, Tata Motors Limited, Bihar & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
21-09-2020 M. Rajalakshmi Versus Union of India Represented by the Secretary to Government Department of Revenue & Disaster Management Govt. of Union Territory of Puducherry & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
21-09-2020 Yellappa Versus The Management of NWKRTC, Rep. by its Divisional Controller, Gadag High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench At Dharwad
09-09-2020 Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Others Versus Goverdhan Lal Soni & Another Supreme Court of India
09-09-2020 Padmavathi Hospitality and Facilities Management Service, Rep. by its Authorized Representative J. Anjananandan Versus The Tamil Nadu Medical Service Corporation, (A Government of Tamil Nadu undertaking), Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
08-09-2020 Jai Bharath College of Management & Engineering Technology, Rep. by Its Chairman, Ernakulam & Others Versus The State of Kerala, Rep. by Its Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department, Trivandrum & Others High Court of Kerala
08-09-2020 Murari Lal Versus State of U.P & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
28-08-2020 Chhotey Lal Versus State of U.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
28-08-2020 Pinnaccle Institute Engg. & Management Versus Biswajit Santra & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
20-08-2020 Indian Overseas Bank, Asset Recovery Management Branch, Rep. by its Chief Manager Versus The District Collector & District Magistrate, Coimbatore & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
18-08-2020 Lal Chand Versus Union Territory of J&K & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
17-08-2020 Hariom Project Private Limited Versus Military Engineer Services, Director Of Contract Management And Ors. High Court of Delhi
11-08-2020 Khaja Nayeemuddin Versus State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Development & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
11-08-2020 Shankar Lal Yadav & Another Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Delhi
06-08-2020 Ram Lal Versus State of HP & Others High Court of Himachal Pradesh
05-08-2020 Dav Institute of Management, Chandigarh Versus Punjab University, Chandigarh High Court of Punjab and Haryana
03-08-2020 Sadanand Versus The State of Karnataka, Rep. by its Secretary Urban Development Department, Bengaluru & Another High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench OF Kalaburagi
30-07-2020 Haryana Urban Development Authority, Haryana & Another Versus Jaswant Singh National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
30-07-2020 Prasad Naik & Another Versus The Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority, through its Member Secretary & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
24-07-2020 P. Prabhavathi Versus The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Authority, Secretariat, Hyderabad & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
17-07-2020 Pyare Lal Versus State of Haryana Supreme Court of India
15-07-2020 Vankudoth Swathi Versus The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Development, Secretariat & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
13-07-2020 Zee Learn Ltd. Versus UTI Asset Management Co. Ltd. & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
03-07-2020 The Management of M/s. Therelek Engineers Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Director, S. Venkatramana Bhat Versus K. Dharman High Court of Karnataka
30-06-2020 Sindhu. S. Lal Versus Revenue Divisional Officer, Adoor & Others High Court of Kerala
29-06-2020 Mohan Lal Jain Versus Insolvency & Bankruptcy Board of India & Another High Court of Delhi
26-06-2020 Amrut Lal @ Amrit Lal Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
24-06-2020 Rajasthan State Warehousing Corporation Versus Star Agriwarehousing And Collateral Management Limited & Others Supreme Court of India
23-06-2020 Munna Lal Versus State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Medical & Health Lko & Others High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
23-06-2020 Nancy Roy Versus Delhi Disaster Management Authority & Others High Court of Delhi
19-06-2020 Vipin Kumar Choudhary Versus Makhan Lal Chaturvedi National University Of Journalism & Communication - Bhopal National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-06-2020 Jivan Lal Verma Versus Kishan Agrotek National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
11-06-2020 Moti Lal @ Moti Lal Patwa Versus Union of India, Ministry of Finance through the Director, Enforcement Directorate, Delhi & Another High Court of Judicature at Patna
03-06-2020 Latelraj Suryawanshi (Latelram Suryawanshi wrongly mentioned in the impugned judgment) Versus Hori Lal Tamboli & Another High Court of Chhattisgarh
02-06-2020 C. Sasiyendran Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, rep., by its Secretary to Government, Housing & Urban Development Department, Chennai & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
01-06-2020 Nagen Chandra Das & Others Versus The State of Assam, Rep. by the Comm. And Secy., Deptt. of Urban Development Deptt., Dispur & Others High Court of Gauhati
01-06-2020 K. Shanthi Versus The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Secretary, Housing and Urban Development Department, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-06-2020 Padmavani Educational & Charitable Trust, Rep.by its Joint Managing Trustee, Salem Versus The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep.its Secretary, Housing & Urban Development Department, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-06-2020 M/s SGS Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Versus State of Bihar Urban Development Agency BUDA, Patna & Another High Court of Judicature at Patna
21-05-2020 Aravapalli Krishna Murthy Versus Syed Lal Saheb Died & Others High Court of Andhra Pradesh
20-05-2020 Diwari Lal & Others Versus State of U.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
19-05-2020 The Federal Agency for State Property Management of the Russian Federation (ROSIMUSHCESTVO) Versus Saraf Agency Pvt. Ltd. & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
14-05-2020 Meena Sharma Versus Nand Lal & Another High Court of Delhi
11-05-2020 Shiv Lal (Since Deceased) Versus Mohan Lal High Court of Punjab and Haryana
08-05-2020 Mohan Lal Versus State of NCT of Delhi Supreme Court of India
08-05-2020 The Management of M/s. Recipharm Pharma Services Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by Assistant General Manager Versus G. Vasanthkumr & Others High Court of Karnataka
05-05-2020 Prabhu & Others Versus The State of Karnataka, by its Secretary Department of Housing & Urban Development, Bangalore & Others High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench At Dharwad
05-05-2020 V. Divakar Versus The State of Karnataka, Department of Urban Development, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Bengaluru & Others High Court of Karnataka
30-04-2020 Jagdish Lal Versus State of Himachal Pradesh High Court of Himachal Pradesh
21-04-2020 State Bank of India, A Government of India Undertaking Rep by its DGM and Branch Head Stressed Asset Management Branch, Hyderabad Versus The Union of India, Ministry of Finance Rep by its Secretary Services Tax Wing, South Block, New Delhi & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
21-04-2020 A. Mallikarjuna Versus Government of India Ministry of Home Affairs, Disaster Management Division, Represented by its Secretary & Others High Court of Karnataka
20-04-2020 Babu Lal Versus State (N.C.T. of Delhi) High Court of Delhi
30-03-2020 Bala Krishna Mandapati Versus The State of Telangana, Rep., by its Chief Secretary, Revenue (Disaster Management-II), Hyderabad & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
24-03-2020 Babu Lal & Others Versus Para Devi & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
17-03-2020 M/s. Rite Choice Foundations and Engineering Pvt. Ltd., Rep., by its Managing Director, C.K. Sridhar Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep., by its Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
17-03-2020 Meghna Singh (Through: Her Natural Guardian) Avita D Lal Versus Central Board of Secondary Education & Another High Court of Delhi
17-03-2020 The Joint Labour Commissioner and Registering Officer & Another Versus Kesar Lal Supreme Court of India
13-03-2020 Nagrik Samanvya Samiti & Others Versus The State of Maharashtra, Through Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
13-03-2020 Ram Pralhad Khatri & Others Versus State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
12-03-2020 The Adirampattinam Education Trust, Adirampattinam Represented by its Secretary, M.S. Tajudeen & Another Versus The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Secretariate, Chennai & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
11-03-2020 Jerome Velho Versus State of Goa, through the Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
11-03-2020 Ram Dulari & Another Versus Ram Lal & Another High Court of Himachal Pradesh
11-03-2020 S.S. Sundaresan Versus State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department, Chennai & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
10-03-2020 V.S. Senthil Kumar Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Secretary, Housing and Urban Development, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
10-03-2020 M/s. Professional Management Consultants (P) Ltd., Chennai Versus Employees State Insurance Corporation, Rep by its Joint Director, Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
09-03-2020 The Principal Officer, M/s. RR Donnelley India Outsource Private Limited, (Formerly known as Astron Document Management Private Limited), Rep. by its Jyothi Prosad Bose, Director Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle – 5 (2) High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-03-2020 Remedial Resolutions Advisors Private Limited (Formerly known as Stressed Asset Management Advisors and Settlement Company Pvt. Ltd.) & Others Versus Capri UK Investments Limited & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
05-03-2020 Gunjan Kumar Versus Management of Circle Head Punjab National Bank, Darbhanga & Others High Court of Judicature at Patna
03-03-2020 T.D. Watson Versus The Principal Secretary / Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Disaster Management and Mitigation Department, Ezhilagam & Another Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
02-03-2020 In The Matter of Anil Duggal Director Representing the suspended management of Duggal Associates Private Ltd., Delhi Versus Roofs & Ceilings Pvt. Ltd., Ghatkopar (W) Mumbai National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
29-02-2020 Lal Chand Versus State of H.P. High Court of Himachal Pradesh
28-02-2020 M/s. Padmavathi Hospitality & Facilities Management Services, Rep. by its Partner & Authorized Representative Pradeep Kanumuri & Another V/S The Tamil Nadu Medical Service Corporation (A Government of Tamil Nadu undertaking) Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-02-2020 Manohar Lal Versus State Of Himachal Pradesh High Court of Himachal Pradesh
27-02-2020 Aman Khattar Versus Jawahar Lal High Court of Delhi
26-02-2020 Anil Dattatraya Girme & Others Versus The State of Maharashtra Through the Ministry of Urban Development, Mantralaya & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
26-02-2020 State Bank of India Stressed Assets Management Branch- II, Kolkata Versus Maithan Alloys Limited, Kolkatta & Others National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
26-02-2020 M/s. Kiran Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. Through Director Manohar Lal Ahuja, Uttar Pradesh Versus Yashpal National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
25-02-2020 R. Thenmozhi Versus The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Housing & Urban Development, Secretariat, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
25-02-2020 Bank of India, Asset Recovery Management Branch, Mumbai Versus Shrenuj & Company Limited, Mumbai National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
25-02-2020 Proprietor, Gandhi Institute of Management & TechnologyProprietor Sarbani Das Versus Alok Kumar Jha National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
24-02-2020 Vuchi Bhuvaneswari Prasad Versus State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Municipal Administration & Urban Development & Others High Court of Andhra Pradesh
24-02-2020 S. Suresh Versus The Management Exide Industries Ltd., Madurai & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
24-02-2020 The Management, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai Division-1), Bye-Pass Salai, Madurai & Another Versus S. Gunasekaran & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
20-02-2020 Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Maharashtra Versus M/s. Dangi Financial & Management Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. Maharashtra National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
19-02-2020 Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., Rep.by its Authorized Representative M.D. Maheshwaran Versus The Special Secretary, Department of Revenue & Disaster Management, Government of Puducherry, Puducherry & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-02-2020 M/s. Behari Lal & sons V/S The State of Punjab High Court of Punjab and Haryana
18-02-2020 Dr. Hira Lal Versus State of Bihar & Others Supreme Court of India
18-02-2020 M/s. Girdhari Lal Constructions (P) Ltd. Dwaraka, New Delhi, Registered Office Bhatinda, Punjab, Represented by Its Director, Vikas Mehta Versus Union of India, Represented by Its Secretary, Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs, New Delhi & Others High Court of Kerala
18-02-2020 Pushparani Versus The Management of Chattan Estate, Kolakambai, The Nilgiris District & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
14-02-2020 The Management, ICICI Bank Limited, ICICI Bank Towers, Mumbai & Others Versus The Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
14-02-2020 New India Assurance Company Ltd. Through Its Duly Constituted Attorney, Manager, Delhi Versus Chaman Lal National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
14-02-2020 Asim Kumar Pal & Others Versus Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
13-02-2020 Vikas Panchayat, Gram Boheda Through Sarpanch, Rajasthan Versus Badri Lal & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
13-02-2020 Jhanak Lal V/S State of Madhya Pradesh High Court of Chattisgarh
13-02-2020 Ashok Alias Gore Lal Veruss State of U.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
11-02-2020 Kanhaiya Lal Versus Lala Ram & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
10-02-2020 C. Jacob Versus The Secretary Department Of Housing & Urban Development, Bangalore & Another High Court of Karnataka
10-02-2020 Achal Bisht Versus Chandigarh Institute of Hotel Management & Catering Technology & Another High Court of Punjab and Haryana
07-02-2020 M/s. Veejay Facility Management Private Limited & Another Versus The Zonal Manager, Bank of India, A & S Department, “Star House” & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
06-02-2020 P. Babu Versus The Union of ndia Rep. by the Secretary to Government Department of Revenue and Disaster Management Government of Puducherry, Puducherry & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras