w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



M/s. Steer Engineering Private Limited, Represented herein by its authorized Signatory, Satish Padmanabhan v/s M/s. Glaxosmithkline Consumer Healthcare Holdings (US)LLC & Others


Company & Directors' Information:- GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24232PB2014FTC039082

Company & Directors' Information:- A V S R HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U67120TG2005PTC045117

Company & Directors' Information:- GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE LIMITED [Active] CIN = L24231PB1958PLC002257

Company & Directors' Information:- M & B ENGINEERING LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45200GJ1981PLC004437

Company & Directors' Information:- S R HOLDINGS LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65993TN1988PLC083659

Company & Directors' Information:- S R HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65993TN1988PTC083659

Company & Directors' Information:- A B HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U70102KA2006PTC040894

Company & Directors' Information:- G. R. ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65990MH1990PTC058602

Company & Directors' Information:- G G ENGINEERING LIMITED [Active] CIN = L28900MH2006PLC159174

Company & Directors' Information:- S K A HOLDINGS LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65993DL1981PLC012592

Company & Directors' Information:- S K A HOLDINGS LIMITED [Active] CIN = L65993DL1981PLC012592

Company & Directors' Information:- V U B ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29290MH2005PTC154033

Company & Directors' Information:- N S ENGINEERING COMPANY PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U29219TG1989PTC010511

Company & Directors' Information:- G J HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51100DL2004PTC126687

Company & Directors' Information:- G J HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65993DL2004PTC126687

Company & Directors' Information:- R G S HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U85110PB2004PTC047381

Company & Directors' Information:- R G S HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U85110CH2004PTC027689

Company & Directors' Information:- P. H. HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U33110MH2010PTC208651

Company & Directors' Information:- S S S ENGINEERING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27205KA1981PTC004194

Company & Directors' Information:- P P HOLDINGS LTD [Active] CIN = U65993PN1981PLC025916

Company & Directors' Information:- B G P HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24232GJ2007PTC050417

Company & Directors' Information:- D R HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U85110GJ2006PTC048008

Company & Directors' Information:- H M G ENGINEERING LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45200MH1977PLC019533

Company & Directors' Information:- K R R ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29309TN1989PTC016852

Company & Directors' Information:- G G ENGINEERING LIMITED [Active] CIN = U28900MH2006PLC159174

Company & Directors' Information:- D B ENGINEERING PRIVATE LTD [Active] CIN = U74899DL1986PTC026541

Company & Directors' Information:- G G ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U28900MH2006PTC159174

Company & Directors' Information:- G S D HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U70109WB1990PTC048518

Company & Directors' Information:- S T HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U67120MH1979PTC021588

Company & Directors' Information:- M C HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U67190DL2009PTC190957

Company & Directors' Information:- J P ENGINEERING CORPN PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U34103WB1951PTC019638

Company & Directors' Information:- J S K HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U67120WB1994PTC065660

Company & Directors' Information:- S N B ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27106DL2007PTC301213

Company & Directors' Information:- P R HOLDINGS LIMITED [Active] CIN = L27310AS1983PLC007154

Company & Directors' Information:- P R HOLDINGS LIMITED [Active] CIN = L27310DL1983PLC314402

Company & Directors' Information:- G R A HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U70101WB1992PTC055865

Company & Directors' Information:- M J HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U93090PN2008PTC132455

Company & Directors' Information:- B S S HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U67120WB1992PTC056874

Company & Directors' Information:- S J HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U85190MH2005PTC153435

Company & Directors' Information:- H M HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65993ML2005PTC007956

Company & Directors' Information:- S M H HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65993TG2006PTC049309

Company & Directors' Information:- M M HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U70109WB1993PTC058147

Company & Directors' Information:- G J HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U85110PB1998PTC021049

Company & Directors' Information:- T P W ENGINEERING LTD [Active] CIN = U27203WB1975PLC029939

Company & Directors' Information:- D J HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U67120MH1992PTC067448

Company & Directors' Information:- C L ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U34300PB1992PTC012057

Company & Directors' Information:- R S M P HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U67190MH1995PTC088443

Company & Directors' Information:- V A G HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1994PTC057817

Company & Directors' Information:- K E HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U70101TN2013PTC089953

Company & Directors' Information:- W & W ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72900TN2003PTC051228

Company & Directors' Information:- M L R ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999TG2006PTC051974

Company & Directors' Information:- I M HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24232CH2010PTC032454

Company & Directors' Information:- K B ENGINEERING CO PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U74160TG1988PTC008366

Company & Directors' Information:- R P ENGINEERING PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U29299WB1992PTC055482

Company & Directors' Information:- K C HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65990MH1981PTC024688

Company & Directors' Information:- J & K ENGINEERING LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45203JK2006PLC002684

Company & Directors' Information:- A TO Z HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1987PTC028294

Company & Directors' Information:- V R HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U70102KA2009PTC051724

Company & Directors' Information:- S P T ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Converted to LLP] CIN = U27109UP2005PTC030940

Company & Directors' Information:- A R F ENGINEERING LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27200TN1980PLC008347

Company & Directors' Information:- J B HOLDINGS LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U91110ML1995PLC004396

Company & Directors' Information:- P G T HOLDINGS LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74899DL1994PLC057886

Company & Directors' Information:- A M ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Amalgamated] CIN = U65910MH1981PTC187856

Company & Directors' Information:- S. S. E. ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U36990MH2007PTC175320

Company & Directors' Information:- S M HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65990MH2011PTC225004

Company & Directors' Information:- M S R HOLDINGS LIMITED [Active] CIN = U85110KA1995PLC018599

Company & Directors' Information:- C T ENGINEERING LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29259GJ1986PLC009007

Company & Directors' Information:- V N C A HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999TN2011PTC081684

Company & Directors' Information:- S C HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74899DL1986PTC025017

Company & Directors' Information:- K G HEALTHCARE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U85110TZ1995PLC006402

Company & Directors' Information:- STEER ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U05190KA1993PTC015303

Company & Directors' Information:- S G HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U70109WB1986PTC040839

Company & Directors' Information:- R AND S ENGINEERING INDIA PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U29199GJ1995PTC027661

Company & Directors' Information:- U AND R ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29199TZ1999PTC009012

Company & Directors' Information:- I Q ENGINEERING (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U85110KA1996PTC021507

Company & Directors' Information:- G M ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U28910GJ2013PTC077091

Company & Directors' Information:- K C A HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1995PTC066204

Company & Directors' Information:- W. E. ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. [Active] CIN = U52335WB1985PTC039370

Company & Directors' Information:- H P HOLDINGS LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U67120HP1997PLC019474

Company & Directors' Information:- L. B. ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999WB2018PTC225084

Company & Directors' Information:- R I ENGINEERING (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74210KA1991PTC012420

Company & Directors' Information:- C S HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U85110GJ2012PTC070018

Company & Directors' Information:- M M HEALTHCARE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1988PLC034339

Company & Directors' Information:- A L B HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U85110UP2002PTC026786

Company & Directors' Information:- U D ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U32109DL1999PTC102586

Company & Directors' Information:- K M T S ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29192DL2005PTC141240

Company & Directors' Information:- C A G ENGINEERING LIMITED [Active] CIN = U00350PB2006PLC029521

Company & Directors' Information:- C A G ENGINEERING LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29110PB2006PLC029521

Company & Directors' Information:- S B M HEALTHCARE (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U33112DL2005PTC140703

Company & Directors' Information:- K L N HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65990TG1986PTC006344

Company & Directors' Information:- D ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29269TZ1932PTC000046

Company & Directors' Information:- V K B ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL2005PTC141483

Company & Directors' Information:- S A HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U85100OR2014PTC018365

Company & Directors' Information:- AND HEALTHCARE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909PB2017PLC046446

Company & Directors' Information:- M R HOLDINGS LIMITED [Active] CIN = U67120MH1978PLC020559

Company & Directors' Information:- J T HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U67120MH1979PTC021585

Company & Directors' Information:- INDIA ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200PN1999PTC014259

Company & Directors' Information:- C N C ENGINEERING LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U93000KA1986PLC007922

Company & Directors' Information:- M K V ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29199TZ1997PTC007736

Company & Directors' Information:- G V T ENGINEERING (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29219DL1996PTC082427

Company & Directors' Information:- H K R HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1982PTC013032

Company & Directors' Information:- R J HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1982PTC013033

Company & Directors' Information:- K D R HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1982PTC013034

Company & Directors' Information:- P D R HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Amalgamated] CIN = U67120WB1996PTC077248

Company & Directors' Information:- W A HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65993DL1997PTC084687

Company & Directors' Information:- W D HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65993DL1997PTC084667

Company & Directors' Information:- K. I. ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999WB2009PTC133109

Company & Directors' Information:- D. S. HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24232WB2007PTC115617

Company & Directors' Information:- A K HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899UP1986PTC037306

Company & Directors' Information:- G M E P ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29192DL1998PTC096737

Company & Directors' Information:- J R D HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1994PTC059769

Company & Directors' Information:- P AND B HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U24230GJ2013PTC075056

Company & Directors' Information:- C S HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U85110KA1995PTC018441

Company & Directors' Information:- R A HOLDINGS LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U17119GJ1986PLC037333

Company & Directors' Information:- J T ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1984PTC018756

Company & Directors' Information:- A V HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U51109WB1992PTC054035

Company & Directors' Information:- K B R HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U67120TG1998PTC030518

Company & Directors' Information:- E K HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1990PTC040323

Company & Directors' Information:- N R HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U67120WB1993PTC060077

Company & Directors' Information:- B P A HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U74990DL1982PTC013326

Company & Directors' Information:- M C ENGINEERING CO PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U74899DL1972PTC006392

Company & Directors' Information:- V V HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1994PTC060480

Company & Directors' Information:- D D B HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U67120WB1992PTC055592

Company & Directors' Information:- M D HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U67120DL2001PTC111221

Company & Directors' Information:- V H A HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Converted to LLP and Dissolved] CIN = U65993DL2003PTC120147

Company & Directors' Information:- K E F HOLDINGS LTD [Amalgamated] CIN = U67120WB1988PLC045280

Company & Directors' Information:- C P ENGINEERING (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27209TN1987PTC014052

Company & Directors' Information:- A P HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U65993PN1981PTC025915

Company & Directors' Information:- N. R. HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U67120MH1993PTC140612

Company & Directors' Information:- M B HOLDINGS LTD. [Not available for efiling] CIN = U70109WB1986PLC041226

Company & Directors' Information:- K M HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1995PTC064343

Company & Directors' Information:- STEER ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29199TZ1993PTC004325

Company & Directors' Information:- H V S ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U28920MH2005PTC158342

Company & Directors' Information:- S C ENGINEERING CO PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U74210WB1982PTC035623

Company & Directors' Information:- SATISH ENGINEERING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29120MH1995PTC087523

Company & Directors' Information:- U M ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29200MH1977PTC019574

Company & Directors' Information:- A S H HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL2004PTC125403

Company & Directors' Information:- A V K ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1995PTC071971

Company & Directors' Information:- S K ENGINEERING CO PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U05001UP1952PTC002408

Company & Directors' Information:- C M HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U45203WB1986PTC041627

Company & Directors' Information:- G D ENGINEERING COMPANY (INDIA) PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U74210WB1993PTC058553

Company & Directors' Information:- V M R ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29120DL2005PTC136764

Company & Directors' Information:- M H HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1995PTC067392

Company & Directors' Information:- K. S. I. ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U36999HR2007PTC036660

Company & Directors' Information:- I K HOLDINGS LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U70101WB1951PLC019703

Company & Directors' Information:- C & R HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. [Active] CIN = U65929WB1991PTC051376

Company & Directors' Information:- N S S ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U28999KA1989PTC010312

Company & Directors' Information:- A P V ENGINEERING CO LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U29113WB1945PLC006428

Company & Directors' Information:- G B ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29212PB1996PTC017500

Company & Directors' Information:- C M S ENGINEERING INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74210TN2010PTC075302

Company & Directors' Information:- K G HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U65929WB1987PTC042868

Company & Directors' Information:- A AND R HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24239DL1999PTC102404

Company & Directors' Information:- T S C ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U70109DL2011PTC217251

Company & Directors' Information:- B & T HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74920DL2007PTC171796

Company & Directors' Information:- K. N. HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U85320RJ2018PTC061003

Company & Directors' Information:- H T S ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999MH2008PTC187914

Company & Directors' Information:- T P ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45201OR2010PTC011517

Company & Directors' Information:- S B ENGINEERING PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U29199GJ1982PTC005292

Company & Directors' Information:- H D HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Amalgamated] CIN = U51109WB1991PTC051415

Company & Directors' Information:- N AND N HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1990PTC040846

Company & Directors' Information:- M S HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24239MH2001PTC130893

Company & Directors' Information:- J J ENGINEERING PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U29219WB1986PTC041433

Company & Directors' Information:- D & L ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Converted to LLP] CIN = U29113TN2004PTC052690

Company & Directors' Information:- M P HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U67120DL1997PTC088350

Company & Directors' Information:- H R P ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U31503MH1997PTC108621

Company & Directors' Information:- S H ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U70101WB1999PTC088930

Company & Directors' Information:- V K S ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U28133TN2005PTC057283

Company & Directors' Information:- M K ENGINEERING PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U29199GJ1995PTC027278

Company & Directors' Information:- B P HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1989PTC038274

Company & Directors' Information:- K P R HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74900TZ2011PTC017467

Company & Directors' Information:- K J ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29299PN2006PTC129171

Company & Directors' Information:- C S S ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45302TN2003PTC051161

Company & Directors' Information:- J. R. HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U85191UP2013PTC054982

Company & Directors' Information:- N. P. ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U31100WB2010PTC150609

Company & Directors' Information:- S R K ENGINEERING CO PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U67120WB1994PTC063442

Company & Directors' Information:- M A P H HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U85100WB2010PTC144870

Company & Directors' Information:- B AND B HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U70101AS1999PTC005674

Company & Directors' Information:- M. G. HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U67120DL2010PTC198226

Company & Directors' Information:- D G HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65110DL1998PTC094466

Company & Directors' Information:- I R HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74120DL2008PTC185743

Company & Directors' Information:- S I HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74120DL2008PTC186043

Company & Directors' Information:- N. C. HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U85191DL2007PTC164437

Company & Directors' Information:- N Y HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24230GJ2010PTC063348

Company & Directors' Information:- M P T ENGINEERING PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U29299KL1994PTC007761

Company & Directors' Information:- C J G HOLDINGS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U70101KL2010PTC038559

Company & Directors' Information:- T S R C ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29100UP2020PTC133920

Company & Directors' Information:- A K ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U50300UP1981PTC005354

Company & Directors' Information:- N N HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U65999WB1990PTC048493

Company & Directors' Information:- O M K HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U67120WB1995PTC072914

Company & Directors' Information:- M K HOLDINGS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65993TN1996PTC036985

Company & Directors' Information:- H M T D ENGINEERING PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U99999MH1981PTC035175

Company & Directors' Information:- K I HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U67120MH1981PTC024069

Company & Directors' Information:- J P ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U28129MH1972PTC015813

Company & Directors' Information:- D R HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65993DL1982PTC013031

Company & Directors' Information:- R R HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1983PTC017127

Company & Directors' Information:- G J HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Not available for efiling] CIN = U65993PB1985PTC006327

Company & Directors' Information:- V M ENGINEERING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U28920MH1969PTC014224

Company & Directors' Information:- H M A ENGINEERING LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45209PB2008PLC031777

Company & Directors' Information:- M G L HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65993TN1994PTC029354

Company & Directors' Information:- K S M ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74210TG1997PTC028612

Company & Directors' Information:- K V R HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65191KA2012PTC063353

Company & Directors' Information:- M M ENGINEERING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Converted to LLP] CIN = U28932MH1979PTC021819

Company & Directors' Information:- R N M HOLDINGS P LTD. [Active] CIN = U65921WB1990PTC050174

Company & Directors' Information:- M D HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U67120CH1983PTC005399

Company & Directors' Information:- R V HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74899DL1989PTC036577

Company & Directors' Information:- N G T ENGINEERING PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27109WB1968PTC027292

Company & Directors' Information:- M A S ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U99999MH1976PTC019233

Company & Directors' Information:- B J HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U67120MH1982PTC028820

Company & Directors' Information:- G R K ENGINEERING (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74200AP2011PTC076356

Company & Directors' Information:- K S V HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U85195HR2011PTC043767

Company & Directors' Information:- P N S ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29120TN2006PTC060120

Company & Directors' Information:- R S HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U70109WB1986PTC040255

Company & Directors' Information:- A D HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U65993WB1976PTC030525

Company & Directors' Information:- S P HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U65993WB1988PTC044540

Company & Directors' Information:- R A HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U70200WB1986PTC040138

Company & Directors' Information:- A HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U70101WB1962PTC025617

Company & Directors' Information:- K P ENGINEERING CORPORATION PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U74200WB1961PTC025258

Company & Directors' Information:- M A N INDIA ENGINEERING LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U74200WB1979PLC020893

Company & Directors' Information:- B I HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U65922WB1988PTC043690

Company & Directors' Information:- R V K ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29253TN2010PTC074505

Company & Directors' Information:- R K ENGINEERING COMPANY PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U74899DL1975PTC007743

Company & Directors' Information:- G S A ENGINEERING CORPN PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U74210WB1957PTC023382

Company & Directors' Information:- A R M ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED. [Strike Off] CIN = U00500JH1988PTC003057

Company & Directors' Information:- E TO E HOLDINGS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65999KA2008PTC047780

Company & Directors' Information:- L & V ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45202MZ2005PTC007690

Company & Directors' Information:- S G A ENGINEERING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29200MH2005PTC154349

Company & Directors' Information:- N M HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U85110MH2000PTC125392

Company & Directors' Information:- C P C ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29120TZ1986PTC001880

Company & Directors' Information:- P K R ENGINEERING INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29130TZ2004PTC011094

Company & Directors' Information:- M A HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U26106UP2003PTC027990

Company & Directors' Information:- R R K ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999WB2011PTC161080

Company & Directors' Information:- A R HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U85110CH2013PTC034820

Company & Directors' Information:- I P HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24239DL2003PTC121211

Company & Directors' Information:- K. D. HEALTHCARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U85100DL2015PTC281658

Company & Directors' Information:- G L HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Dormant under section 455] CIN = U74996KA2008PTC044867

Company & Directors' Information:- D M S ENGINEERING CO PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U28920WB1964PTC026168

Company & Directors' Information:- A AND M HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U67190TG1995PTC021464

Company & Directors' Information:- K V S HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U65993WB1993PTC060850

Company & Directors' Information:- V K HOLDINGS PRIVATE LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U27924DL1987PTC027924

Company & Directors' Information:- S D S ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U28999PN2000PTC014838

Company & Directors' Information:- A P HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24230MH1999PTC122520

Company & Directors' Information:- N T ENGINEERING COMPANY PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U99999PY1986PTC000445

Company & Directors' Information:- Q AND A HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U67120MH2000PTC127319

Company & Directors' Information:- S K HOLDINGS PVT. LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U99999UP1988PTC010231

Company & Directors' Information:- R K ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U31100MH2005PTC152838

Company & Directors' Information:- V J S ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29130TN1996PTC036636

Company & Directors' Information:- R. K. V. ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29253MH2010PTC205237

Company & Directors' Information:- K Y O S HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51397HP2010PTC031280

Company & Directors' Information:- U S ENGINEERING PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U34300CH1986PTC006887

Company & Directors' Information:- V A HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U67120KL1986PTC004442

Company & Directors' Information:- A D ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74210OR1989PTC002348

Company & Directors' Information:- R J ENGINEERING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27107RJ1972PTC001441

Company & Directors' Information:- H F ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29244KL2013PTC033909

Company & Directors' Information:- O N ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1988PTC031987

Company & Directors' Information:- S R HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65993TN1980PTC008388

Company & Directors' Information:- P S R ENGINEERING PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U40200WB1987PTC042244

Company & Directors' Information:- P N ENGINEERING CO PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U74210WB1980PTC032750

Company & Directors' Information:- A M A R ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29219DL1997PTC084187

Company & Directors' Information:- M T R HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U67110KA2007PTC042600

Company & Directors' Information:- S G D ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29210KA2009PTC050452

Company & Directors' Information:- G A S ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29191MH2004PTC149606

Company & Directors' Information:- G T ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29219PN2012PTC145781

Company & Directors' Information:- M. M. K. ENGINEERING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29305MH2014PTC252830

Company & Directors' Information:- K. B. B. K. HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U85110RJ2013PTC041465

Company & Directors' Information:- K-4 ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U31400MH2010PTC204004

Company & Directors' Information:- C S A HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65990MH1995PTC092555

Company & Directors' Information:- T.H.E. HEALTHCARE COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U33111MH2012PTC229451

Company & Directors' Information:- K N Z HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U67120MH1998PTC117331

Company & Directors' Information:- S H HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U67120MH2001PTC131041

Company & Directors' Information:- N J ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45209MH2015PTC262607

Company & Directors' Information:- J S B HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74120MH2013PTC248848

Company & Directors' Information:- D L HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U67100TN2012PTC083929

Company & Directors' Information:- P C T HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U70101TZ2004PTC010971

Company & Directors' Information:- P R S ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29253TN2009PTC073915

Company & Directors' Information:- U P S ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U40300TN2013PTC090167

Company & Directors' Information:- PADMANABHAN ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74900TZ2007PTC013862

Company & Directors' Information:- J S D HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74120UP2011PTC046578

Company & Directors' Information:- S V T HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U85100TZ2009PTC015287

Company & Directors' Information:- M J P HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74900TG2015PTC098835

Company & Directors' Information:- K G D ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45400WB2014PTC200732

Company & Directors' Information:- P H HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U67120WB1985PTC039369

Company & Directors' Information:- A N S HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U85100HP2011PTC031745

Company & Directors' Information:- J M HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24230CH2007PTC030943

Company & Directors' Information:- T A ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U28992CH2003PTC025800

Company & Directors' Information:- M N A ENGINEERING PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U45202CH2006PTC030215

Company & Directors' Information:- P R HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED. [Strike Off] CIN = U24231DL2003PTC120123

Company & Directors' Information:- R S M HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U24232DL2005PTC136255

Company & Directors' Information:- A A P ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27106DL2005PTC138318

Company & Directors' Information:- J D S HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65993DL1993PTC053637

Company & Directors' Information:- M R S HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U67120DL2001PTC113197

Company & Directors' Information:- A C ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29253DL2011PTC222515

Company & Directors' Information:- S. Z. ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29253DL2014PTC274095

Company & Directors' Information:- IN ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74210DL2011PTC212284

Company & Directors' Information:- J N ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45400DL2015PTC278906

Company & Directors' Information:- N I ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45400DL2015PTC280734

Company & Directors' Information:- A N D ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51502DL2012PTC242516

Company & Directors' Information:- R R V ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51909DL1997PTC089342

Company & Directors' Information:- Z. M. ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909DL2007PTC168270

Company & Directors' Information:- K Y ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74999DL2013PTC248278

Company & Directors' Information:- M H HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999DL2016PTC289311

Company & Directors' Information:- J S M S HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45201DL2002PTC117110

Company & Directors' Information:- R AND T ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U34300DL2005PTC136846

Company & Directors' Information:- N T HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U85100DL2012PTC241304

Company & Directors' Information:- R A HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U85190DL2009PTC188221

Company & Directors' Information:- B R HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Amalgamated] CIN = U74899HR1994PTC064054

Company & Directors' Information:- THE ENGINEERING CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U99999KA1951PTC000699

Company & Directors' Information:- G & G HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51397HR2015PTC057293

Company & Directors' Information:- S J P ENGINEERING CO. PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51505KA2002PTC030808

Company & Directors' Information:- P D HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24230GJ2004PTC045131

Company & Directors' Information:- L. V. G. HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24233GJ2006PTC047749

Company & Directors' Information:- P R S HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U67120KA2010PTC052295

Company & Directors' Information:- S I ENGINEERING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27109UP1967PTC003182

Company & Directors' Information:- W D ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29308MH2020PTC345065

Company & Directors' Information:- M AND D HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U67120MH1981PTC025882

Company & Directors' Information:- S D ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U18101DL1999PTC102948

Company & Directors' Information:- S H G HEALTHCARE PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U85110WB1989PTC047231

Company & Directors' Information:- A T HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U74899DL1994PTC057216

Company & Directors' Information:- J AND S HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U67120RJ1996PTC012114

Company & Directors' Information:- M B D ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74210DL2008PTC181446

Company & Directors' Information:- HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51103KL2001PTC014938

Company & Directors' Information:- S K V HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65993DL1981PTC012910

Company & Directors' Information:- S M K S HOLDINGS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U45400WB1990PTC048498

Company & Directors' Information:- A. B. C. ENGINEERING CORPORATION LIMITED [Not available for efiling] CIN = U99999MH1950PLC008192

Company & Directors' Information:-  ENGINEERING COMPANY ( [Not Available for eFiling] CIN = U99999MH1951PLC010002

    Commercial Appeal No. 5 of 2019

    Decided On, 18 October 2019

    At, High Court of Karnataka

    By, THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ABHAY S. OKA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ

    For the Appellant: Swati Sukumara, Pradeep Nayak, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1 to R3, V. Srinivasa Raghavan, Senior Counsel, M. Nikhilesh Rao, Advocate.



Judgment Text

(Prayer: This Commercial appeal (COMAP) is filed under Section 13 (1A) of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate division of the High Court Act, 2015 read with Order XLIII Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying to set aside the order dated 17.07.2019 in Com.O.S.194/2019, passed by the learned LXXXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (Commercial Court), Bengaluru, dismissing I.A. No.2 and consequently, to allow I.A. No.2 filed by the appellant in Com. O.S.No.194/2019 filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.)

Abhay S. Oka, CJ.

This appeal is by the Plaintiff in Com O.S. 194/2019 pending on the file of the LXXXII City Civil Judge (CCH-83) Bengaluru. By the impugned Order dated 17th July, 2019, the learned trial Judge has rejected Interlocutory Application No.2/2019 filed by the plaintiff-appellant in the said Commercial Suit. The prayer in the said IA was for grant of an interim order of injunction. As noted in the order dated 30th August, 2019, the appellant has deleted the name of the 4th respondent from this appeal and has stated that an application will be made before the trial Court for deleting the name of the 4th respondent from cause title of the suit.

FACTS:

1. The appellant is the plaintiff and the respondents are the defendants. The appellant claims to be an innovator company which has solved several problems in the area of industrial manufacture. The appellant has stated that it has done work of different categories of industries. It is stated that the appellant has applied for several patents for its pioneering processes, products and machines. According to the appellant, it had also applied for over one hundred patents in the area of continuous process of engineering and the list containing grant of patents and patent applications pending has been annexed to the plaint. The appellant has stated that it is a part of the STEER group of companies and said STEER group of companies also extends its operations in manufacturing process in food and pharmaceutical industry which provides unique solutions in the product development and drug delivery systems. It is stated that STEER group also designs/creates advanced technology platforms which can help manufacturers and research departments test and create formulations at the laboratory level and for commercial production. The awards received by the appellants for its contribution as an innovator in polymer science and extruder technology have been set out in the plaint.

2. It is stated in the plaint that the appellant's pioneering technology was the use of the process of extrusion in various industries. The process of extrusion is a manufacturing process in which a softened material is typically forced through a shaped metal piece or die to produce a formed product. It is claimed that the appellant has prior experience of gelatinizing starches used in extruder in a controlled manner. In addition, the appellant has a prior experience with simultaneous gelatinization and hydrolysis of starch using an extruder. It is claimed that the appellant's work in the area of technology is confidential. It is alleged that the appellant has taken measures to ensure that the information is available only on a need to know basis under strict confidentiality obligations.

3. The case of the appellant is that the appellant's test results and its databases are protected under Section 2 (o) of the Copyright Act, 1957 (for short, 'the said Act of 1957'). It is alleged that the appellant has expended its independent skill, labour, time and capital in generating its proprietary test databases and test results which are its original works and therefore, they are entitled to protection under the said Act of 1957. It is alleged that from the year 2013 to 2015, the appellant was consulted by the 4th respondent who had unsuccessfully been trying to use the process of extrusion for manufacture of its nutritional beverage called Horlicks. In this period, the appellant devoted its extensive efforts and used its knowledge of extrusion process to enable the use of extrusion process for manufacture of Horlicks. It is alleged that use of extrusion technology for the manufacture of nutritional beverages was not known before the pioneering work made by the appellant. It is alleged that prior to being approached by the 4th respondent, the appellant had developed technologies in-house that enable controlled gelatinization of starch in an extruder and the same has been admitted by the 4th respondent in the task order dated 14th August, 2013 and that the said respondent had no knowledge of using extruder without the pre-conditioner (or batch mixer). A Master Services Agreement (MSA) was earlier entered between the appellant and the 4th respondent. The appellant has set out the details of the process parameters for manufacturing of Horlicks at the laboratory scale developed by it. It is alleged that the process parameters and the manner of elimination of the pre- conditioner, while using extruders, are confidential and the intellectual property of the appellant. It is claimed that the copyright works were created by the appellant's employees and therefore, the appellant is the first owner of copyright in these test databases and has the exclusive rights inter alia to use, reproduce, and communicate to the public these databases as provided in Section 14 of the said Act of 1957. It is, therefore, alleged that any breach of these rights would amount to infringement of the appellant's copyright.

Without prejudice to the contentions narrated supra, it is further contended in the plaint that the appellant has also secured its right under a contract. In support of the said claim, the appellant has relied upon its Master Services Agreement (MSA) entered with the 4th respondent on 9th August, 2013 read with various tasks orders issued from 14th August, 2013 till 28th April, 2014. It is claimed that the appellant's rights in its confidential information and all intellectual property relating to or arising from its hardware were well protected.

4. It is contended in the plaint that the first and second respondents have made international patent application in the subject matter of the present suit. It is alleged that the reading of the background to invention mentioned in the impugned international patent application shows that it admits that gelatinization of starches in an extruders at high speeds and using high shear was not known. The first and second respondents admit that the prior art in fact taught that higher amounts of water and enzyme is required for higher conversion of starches.

5. It is pointed out that the impugned patent application describes experiments conducted at the plaintiff's premises where gelatinization of starches was done in an extruder at high speed using lower amounts of enzyme and water. The admission are quoted as under:

"a. Example 1, internal page 9: Use of Omega series of extruders available from Steer India for the process of the patent invention.

b. Example 2, internal page 13: Use of Omega 30 twin-screw extruder (Steer India) for production of a dextrinized product."

It is pointed out that the appellant is involved in an arbitration proceedings against inter alia GSK Consumer Healthcare Pte Ltd, which is a company incorporated in Singapore and the proceedings are pending before Singapore International Arbitration Centre. The appellant relied on two orders passed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1986, in arbitration proceedings before the Delhi High Court. It is stated that during the course of said arbitral proceedings before Singapore International Arbitration Centre, the GSK Consumer Healthcare Pte Ltd, (for short, Singapore Company') filed a reply to the appellant's application for interim relief on 23rd May, 2019. In the said reply, the Singapore Company referred to filing of the impugned patent application by the 1st and 2nd respondents. It is alleged that the appellant was shocked to find that the impugned patent application incorporates the appellant's intellectual property and confidential information. It is stated that the act of the 1st and 2nd respondents of filing and causing publication of the impugned international patent application gives rise to the present suit. It is stated that the impugned application has been assigned to the 1st and 2nd respondents by the 3rd respondent, as reflected from the records of the Indian Patent Office. The appellant has reproduced in paragraph-21, the background to the invention as stated in the impugned patent application. In paragraph 22 of the plaint, the key claims of the impugned patent application have been set out. It is further alleged that from the claims made in the impugned international patent application, the 1st and 2nd respondents have unlawfully disclosed and are seeking a monopoly over the appellant's proprietary extruder technology, parameters directly emanating from appellant's hardware and know-how which was confidential and proprietary to the appellant even prior to its engagement by the 4th respondent. It is further alleged that the act of filing and publishing of the impugned international patent application amounts to infringement of the appellant's rights in its proprietary information and intellectual property. It is alleged that the 1st and 2nd respondents have unlawfully used the appellant's test databases in drafting the impugned patent application and the act of using, storing and reproducing the test results amounts to infringement of copyright. The allegation is that the act of 1st and 2nd respondents amounts to misappropriation of a part of the appellant's technologies which admittedly have great commercial value.

6. On the basis of the above allegations/pleadings, the appellant has filed the commercial suit, seeking a perpetual injunction to restrain the respondents, its group/sisters concern companies from infringing the rights of the appellant in its intellectual property or confidential information in any manner including by asserting, enforcing any rights in the International Patent Application No.PCT/US2016/028574 against any party, or from transferring the said patent application to any third party. The interim relief prayed in IA-2/2019 is in same terms. In addition, in the plaint, a prayer is made for passing order for damages in a sum of Rs.1,00,00,000/-.

7. A statement of objections was filed by the 1st and 2nd respondents to the Interim Application (IA-2/2019). The first prayer made therein is that the plaint filed by the appellant under Order-VII Rule-1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 be rejected, as it has not disclosed any cause of action. It is claimed that there is no cause of action against 3rd and 4th respondents. It is pointed out that the appellant has also claimed its right under Master Services Agreement dated 9th August, 2013 between itself and the 4th respondent which contains a jurisdictional clause as well as the dispute resolution clause which provides for arbitration with its seat in London. In view of the specific clause contained in the said Master Services Agreement, the appellant will have to abide by the provisions of Master Services Agreement and take recourse to the remedy as provided therein. Another contention raised is about the territorial jurisdiction of the suit filed before the Civil Court at Bengaluru. It is contended that there is a mis-joinder of parties, inasmuch as, the 3rd and 4th respondents have been unnecessarily made parties to the proceedings, though no relief could be claimed against them. It is stated that in the list of patent applications filed by the appellant, the details of number of applications, patents granted and those pending have been mentioned, but in none of these applications, the appellant claims anything similar to what the impugned patent application contains. It is contended that the confidential information and intellectual property in question does not belong to the appellant but rather it belongs to GSK entity. Reliance was placed on clauses contained in the Masters Services Agreement between the appellant and 4th respondent and subsequent Service Development Agreement dated 29th October, 2015 between the appellant and Glaxo Smith Kline Consumer Healthcare Pte Ltd., which clearly records that all project intellectual property rights shall belongs to and vest in GSK. It is contended that the project IPR is defined in the said agreement with the GSK Company includes all intellectual property rights relating to any outputs. It is contended that test results and test databases relating to the project fall within the meaning of outputs. It is contended that the Development Services Agreement between the appellant and the Glaxo Smith Kline Consumer Healthcare Pte Ltd, clearly records that the 4th respondent has transferred its rights and interest over the Master Services Agreement to GSK. It is contended that the 4th respondent had developed the GSK two twin extrusion process before engaging the appellant including with other third parties and its running process without using a pre- conditioner.

8. It is contended that the appellant has an alternate remedy of filing pre-grant opposition under Section 25 of the Indian Patent Act, 1970 (for short, said Act of 1970). It is alleged that the said remedy ought to have been exhausted by the appellant before filing the commercial suit. It is contended that the appellant has not made out a prima facie case. Further, it is contended that the impugned patent application was published on 15th December 2017 in the official journal of the Indian Patent Office. Though the appellant claims that it came to know about the impugned patent application on 23rd May, 2019, the suit is filed only on 3rd July, 2019 and hence, there was delay in filing the commercial suit. It is alleged that 4th respondent, prior to any of the engagement with the appellant, had knowledge of using extrusion process for making Horlicks without a pre-conditioner and that the confidential information of intellectual property in question does not belonging to the appellant. It is submitted that the elimination of pre-conditioner cannot be a confidential information belonging to the appellant.

Decision of the trial Judge:

9. The learned trial judge, by the impugned judgment and order dated 17th July, 2019, after considering the conditions contained in the Master Services Agreement dated 9th August, 2013 wherein the appellant has been referred to as supplier and 4th respondent has been referred to as GSK, held that the information relating to any project of intellectual property rights or outputs under the Master Services Agreement or to be provided is a confidential information of GSK and not of the supplier. Secondly, it was held that the impugned International Patent Application was published on 27th October, 2016. The learned trial judge further held that the concept of two extruders in series for the conversion and drying of dextrinized starch, the production process, formulation and the technical information relating to the product disclosed by the 4th respondent to the appellant is an intellectual property exclusively owned by the 4th respondent. It was held that there is no document placed on record to show the details of the test of experiments etc., and the documents produced are incomplete which do not bear any signature and there was no material placed to show that the original literary work was done by the appellant. The learned trial Judge held that the impugned International Patent Application was published on 27th October, 2016 and database in the said application is in the public domain, since nearly about three years. It was further held that it is not stated in the International Patent Application that two extruder experiment was done in the premises of the appellant and hence, it cannot be said that the appellant has made out a prima facie case and balance of convenience lies in its favour. It was held that it cannot be said that the appellant would be put to irreparable injury, if the interim order is refused. Consequently, rejected IA-2/2019 filed by the plaintiff-appellant herein.

SUBMISSIONS

10. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the 4th respondent was the only party with whom 1st to 3rd respondents had contractual relationship earlier. She submitted that the learned trial Judge completely ignored the fact that the 1st to 3rd respondents denied having derived any right, title or interest in the subject matter of the suit from 4th respondent. The learned counsel submitted that the 1st to 3rd respondents have not acquired any title or rights from 4th respondent. She pointed out that the rights of the 4th respondent stood transferred to GSK company which is not involved in filing patent application. Her submission is that there was no reason for the trial Court to go into the interpretation of Master Services Agreement between the appellant and the 4th respondent, when 1st to 3rd respondents were not claiming any right, title or interest from the 4th respondent. She submitted that even under the relevant clauses of MSA, the 4th respondent could not have transferred the confidential information of the appellant without consent of the appellant. She submitted that the finding recorded by the trial Court that the appellant was seeking an injunction on the process of extrusion is erroneous. She submitted that the appellant had made out a strong prima facie case and what was claimed in the impugned patent application was not the process of GSK but it is the appellant's process. She pointed out that GSK's extrusion process was involved in using a pre- conditioner/batch mixer before extrusion. She pointed that the impugned patent application does not contemplate a pre- conditioner/batch mixer and it envisages direct feeding of flour/starch into extruders which is, in fact, the appellant's process and therefore, the appellant is having title, right and interest over the process of said extrusion technology.

11. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant's claim was on confidential information possessed by it prior to the execution of MSA and even the claim of the appellant over the process machine parameters was a prior claim. She pointed out that the suit was also based on the misappropriation of confidential information, of which the impugned patent application was one part. She pointed out that the impugned patent application mentions only two experiments in support of the claimed invention and both the experiments were conducted on the appellant's machines. She submitted that significantly, the appellant had not sold its machines to any of the respondents including 1st to 3rd respondents.

12. On the issue of the finding on delay, she submitted that the appellant had acquired knowledge of the impugned patent application only on 23rd May, 2019 in the course of arbitral proceedings before the Singapore International Arbitration Centre. She submitted that the impugned patent application was filed by stranger entities under the broad title 'a Novel Process' and therefore, it was not possible for the appellant to become aware of the same. She submitted that the prayer in the suit was in relation to alienation of confidential information as distinguished from prayer regarding the impugned patent application.

13. The learned counsel submitted that not a single document has been submitted by the 1st to 3rd respondents to support their claim that they owned the confidential information and as to how they came in possession of the tests data of the appellant. She submitted that the 1st to 3rd respondents have deliberately withheld the material information about the source of confidential information. As such, the trial Court ought to have drawn an adverse inference against the respondents.

14. As regards balance of convenience, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the confidential information subject matter of the suit was referred in the impugned patent application. She pointed out that in the interim application, a restraint order for non-alienation of the said information was sought, in view of the impending sale of the Horlicks business to a third party. It is claimed that as the 1st to 3rd respondents are not using extrusion for manufacture of Horlicks and therefore, balance of convenience was in favour of the appellant. She submitted that irreparable loss and injury would be caused to the appellant, if interim order of injunction is not granted, inasmuch as, the confidential information will be lost forever.

15. There are certain other arguments canvassed about the redacted documents. However, during the course of oral arguments, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant not pressed the said document into service. She would submit that the appeal be allowed and interim injunction, as sought for be granted in favour of the appellant.

16. The learned counsel appearing for the 1st to 3rd respondents submitted that before filing commercial suit, the appellant ought to have exhausted the alternative remedy by filing pre-grant opposition before the Indian Patent Office, as contemplated under Section 25 and 26 of the said Act of 1970. He submitted that the only evidence placed on record by the appellant to show that the alleged information was belonging to the appellant was the document No.4 which was rightly discarded by the trial Court. He pointed out that the objection taken by the appellant against the finding of the learned trial Judge on this issue has been withdrawn. He submitted that prior to the execution of Master Services Agreement dated 9th August, 2013, there is no record available to show that the confidential information was owned by the appellant and the same has been misappropriated by the respondents. He submitted that in case of alleged copyright infringement, the work over which the copyright is being claimed has to be produced before the Court which has not been done by the appellant. He submitted that it is a fit case where the Court of first instance can exercise its discretion and rightly refused to grant an interim order of injunction. He submitted that there was a gross delay in filing the suit and that the confidential information claimed by the appellant has not been particularized. He submitted that there was an adequate explanation for the appearance of the appellant's name in the impugned patent application.

17. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that it was the duty of the 1st to 3rd respondents to disclose on oath the source of information which is found in the impugned patent application filed by the 1st and 2nd respondents. In support of her contention, she relied upon a decision of the Apex Court in the case of Gopal Krishnaji Ketkar -vs- Mohamed Haji Latif and others (AIR 1968 SC 1413). She submitted that the Apex Court has held that every party to a suit or proceedings is under an obligation to place on record the document in his/its custody which could throw light on the controversy involved in the lis, though there is no burden to prove any fact on that party. She submitted that as per the law laid down in the said decision, the 1st to 3rd respondents were under obligation to explain as to the source of information possessed them. As, they have failed to do so, an adverse inference has to be drawn against them. She also relied upon another decision of the Apex Court in the case of Badat and Company Bombay -vs- East India Trading Co (AIR 1964 SC 538). The learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that the delay in filing the suit will not defeat the right/claim of the appellant and the prayer for interim injunction. She submitted that raising an objection to the impugned patent application is not an efficacious remedy for the appellant.

CONSIDERATION OF SUBMISSIONS:

18. We have given careful consideration to the submissions made by the respective counsel. We have carefully perused the averments made in the plaint. The perusal of the averments made in the plaint will show that the relief sought by the appellant is in twofold:

i) First one is for protecting appellant's Copyright in an intellectual property.

ii) The second one is for protecting rights of the appellant in respect of alleged copyright.

19. As far as the confidential information is concerned, it is necessary to refer to the material averments made in paragraphs 8 and 9 of the plaint which read thus:

"8. One of the plaintiff's pioneering technologies was the use of the process of extrusion in various industries. Extrusion is a manufacturing process in which a softened material is typically forced through a shaped metal piece or dies to produce a formed product.

9. The Plaintiff had prior experience of gelatinizing starches in an extruder in a controlled manner. In addition the plaintiff had prior experience with simultaneous gelatinization and hydrolysis of starch using an extruder. The plaintiff's work in this area of technology is confidential and proprietary information and the plaintiff has taken measures to ensure that this information is only available on a need to know basis under strict confidentiality obligations."

(underline supplied)

As far as the alleged Copyright is concerned, the material averments are in paragraph-11 of the plaint which read thus:

"11. The Plaintiff's test results and test databases are protected under section 2 (o) of the Copyright Act, 1957. The Plaintiff has expended independent skill, labour, time and capital in generating its proprietary test databases and test results, and these are original works entitled to protection under the Copyright Act, 1957. The test databases contain extensive test results and an illustrative extract of the redacted test database created prior to the Plaintiff's engagement with defendant No.4, is produced herewith as Document No.4."

(underline supplied)

20. As far as the impugned patent application is concerned, we may note here that said application was filed by the 3rd respondent which was transferred to 1st and 2nd respondents. As observed by the learned trial judge, the impugned patent application was filed in the year 2015 and the databases in the said application are in the public domain, since nearly about three years with effect from 27th October 2016.

21. Now, coming to the knowledge of the violations alleged in the plaint, as per the averments made in paragraph 18 onwards of the plaint, it is the specific case of the appellant that on 23rd May, 2019, when Singapore Company filed a reply to the appellant's application before the Singapore International Arbitration Centre, the appellant came to know about filing of the impugned patent application and found that the confidential information of the appellant was disclosed in the said application.

22. The basic allegation in the plaint is that the impugned patent application incorporates the appellant's intellectual property and confidential information. The appellant has quoted what is stated in the patent application and the key claims made in the patent application. The said details are set out in paragraph-22 of the plaint. Thus, the case of the appellant is that the acts of 1st to 3rd respondents of using, storing and reproducing the test results of the appellant's amounts to infringement of its copyright. Secondly, the confidential information that is proprietary to the plaintiff is reproduced in the impugned patent application. The case of the appellant is that know-how of extruder technology was confidential and proprietary to the appellant even prior to its engagement with the 4th respondent.

23. Coming back to the case regarding existence of the copyright, according to the averments made in paragraph 11, proprietary test databases and test results are original works of the appellant which are entitled to protection under the said Act of 1957. The appellant has specifically stated that databases contain extensive test results. It is stated that an illustrative extract of the redacted test database created prior to appellant's engagement with 4th respondent is produced as document No.4 to the plaint. The trial Court, by recording a specific finding rejected the said document No.4 for the reasons recorded in paragraph 9 of the impugned order. Firstly, the learned trial judge has observed that there are no details of test databases test experiments in it. Moreover, it is an incomplete document which does not contain signature of anybody. Apart from that, the appellant has filed an application being IA-3/2019 before this Court, in which it was prayed that a sealed cover-A containing confidential lab notes, lab data and test databases created by the appellant prior to its engagement with 4th respondent in addition to the complete un- redacted document No.4 filed with the plaint be permitted to be produced before the Court. However, we must note here that the order dated 30th August, 2019 passed by this Court records that the appellant did not press the said IA 3/2019. IA 2/2019 was filed again referring to sealed cover-A and praying for a direction to the respondents to nominate not more than three Advocates who shall constitute a confidentiality club who would be entitled to inspect the confidential document/information. However, the order dated 30th August, 2019 passed by this Court records that even the said application was not pressed by the appellant, with liberty to apply for the trial Court keep the said document confidential. Thus, even according to case made out in paragraph 11 of the plaint, the proprietary test databases and test results are original works of the appellant which are entitled to protection under the said Act of 1957. Only an extract of redacted test database was produced as document No.4. It is not a complete document and does not bear any signature. Thus, the original work in respect of which Copyright is claimed was not produced before the trial Court. Only a redacted version of alleged original work was produced. Applications being IA-2/2019 and 3/2019 under which the appellant sought permission for production of confidential databases containing extensive test results created prior to appellant's engagement with 4th respondent were withdrawn as not pressed.

24. As narrated earlier, cogent reasons have been recorded by the trial Court for discarding document No.4. The main reason is that what was produced was a redacted document. It is settled law that in a suit filed alleging infringement of Copyright, the plaintiff must show to the Court what is the original literary, dramatic, musical and artistic work etc., in respect of which a Copyright is claimed.

25. The reasons given by the trial Court for rejection of document No.4 cannot be faulted with at this stage, inasmuch as, what was produced before the trial Court was an ordinary redacted copy. As stated earlier, apart from producing document No.4, the appellant had filed IA-2/2019 and 3/2019 for production of originals of databases containing extensive test results prior to appellant's engagement with 4th respondent in sealed cover-A, in this appeal, which were not pressed at later stage, as per order dated 30th August, 2019. Thus, it is clear that the proprietary test databases and test results were not produced before the trial Court and even before this Court. According to the case of the appellant, the proprietary test databases and test results are its original works which deserve protection under the said Act of 1957. Therefore, it will have to be held that as far as infringement of Copyrights is concerned, no prima facie case is made out. As noted earlier, the IAs were withdrawn with liberty to apply to the trial Court.

26. Now we turn to the issue of confidential information. In order to prove such a claim, the plaintiff must clearly identify the information relied upon by it and must show that it was the information that could be treated as a confidential information. What is important is that that the confidential information must be identified and confidential information so identified must be original and not in public domain.

27. At this juncture, it will be necessary to refer to the averments made in paragraph 15 of the plaint as regards the confidential information which reads thus:

"15. The process parameters and the manner of elimination of the pre-conditioner, while using extruders, are confidential to and the intellectual property of the plaintiff. The Plaintiff has made significant efforts to keep its unique knowledge about, and skills within, the production of nutritional beverages using the extrusion process using the extrusion equipment, confidential. The Plaintiff's knowledge and skills have been built up through thousands of tests. The said efforts have been kept secret partly through the fact that internal information has been distributed on a need-to-know basis only and partly by the conclusion of confidentiality agreements between the Plaintiff's and their clients and subcontractors, where the subcontractors have been involved in the production."

28. We must note her that Master Services Agreement (MSA) was entered into between the appellant and the 4th respondent on 9th August, 2013 and the task order was entered into between the appellant and the 4th respondent on 14th August, 2013. In fact, there are three other task orders dated 16th September 2013, 26th November, 2013 and 28th April, 2014. Thus, it is clear that there was a Master Services Agreement existed as on 9th August, 2013 itself. In paragraph- 14 of the plaint, it is vaguely stated that from 2013 to 2015, the appellant devoted extensive efforts to use its proprietary hardware to develop the process parameters for the manufacture of Horlicks at its laboratory scale. Thus, the averments made in the said paragraph indicate that the information which is now claimed as confidential may have come into existence after the appellant's transactions i.e., Master Services Agreement and Task orders with the 4th respondent. There is no material at this stage to conclude that the alleged confidential information was in existence before MSA was executed.

29. There is one more aspect of the case. The learned trial Judge has referred to the terms contained in the Master Services Agreement and task orders entered into between the plaintiff-appellant and the 4th respondent. The learned trial Judge has relied upon terms contained in clause 1.1 of the said MSA., defining confidential information. The said clause 1.1 of the MSA., reads thus:

"in relation to either party any information or date (in whatever media), including data of a personal nature, which is made available by that party or its Affiliates or its or their Agents to the other or its Affiliates or its or their Agents for the purposes of this Agreement or which (in the case of Confidential Information of GSK) relates to any Intellectual Property Rights which are assigned to GSK under this Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, information relating to any Project IPR and/or Outputs under this Agreement shall be treated as the Confidential Information of GSK and not the Supplier."

Thus, in view of the terms contained in clause 1.1 quoted supra, the learned trial Judge has come to the conclusion that the information relating to project intellectual property rights and outputs under the agreement shall be treated as confidential information of GSK and not that of the appellant. It will be therefore necessary to make a reference to the terms and conditions of the MSA between the appellant and GSK. Some of the terms and conditions contained in MSA have been quoted by the learned trial Judge in the impugned judgment and order. In paragraph 15 of the impugned order, the learned trial Judge referred to the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant to the effect that the impugned International Patent Application (IPA) includes parameters developed and test databases of the plaintiff, as could be compared with document No.4. The case of the appellant is that in the impugned patent application, it is stated that two extruder experiments were made

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

in the premises of the appellant. On perusal of the impugned international patent application, the learned trial Judge rightly held that there is nothing mentioned in the patent application that experiments of two extruders were done in the premises of the appellant. 30. Firstly, we may note here that no reliance can be placed on document No.4. Secondly, the appellant has not come out with clear case as to when the alleged confidential information consisting of proprietary test databases and test results was generated. It was necessary for the appellant to prove the same so as to prove that it was an information which was confidential and it was generated before it was parted with under MSA executed with the fourth respondent. The appellant was required to clearly identify the information relied upon by it and establish that, prima facie, the said information is of a confidential nature. On perusal of the case made out in the plaint, for the reasons recorded above, it is very difficult for this Court to accept that such a prima facie case is made out by the appellant. If such a prima facie case is not made out, the fact that the 1st to 3rd respondents did not disclose as to how they obtained information which is a part of the impugned patent application has no relevance at all. 31. As stated earlier, the relief claimed by the plaintiff- appellant is not only in respect of the infringement of its Copyright but also about confidential information disclosed in the impugned patent application. Injunction is claimed against the 1st to 3rd respondents from infringing the appellant's rights in respect of confidential information and its intellectual property rights in any manner including by asserting and enforcing any rights in the impugned international patent application. It is in the context of the relief concerning confidential information, the delay may be relevant. As noted by the learned trial Judge, the impugned international patent application which was filed on 21st April, 2016 was published on 27th October, 2016 and therefore, the alleged confidential information disclosed in the impugned patent application was in public domain with effect from 27th October 2016. When the appellant claims equitable relief which is of a discretionary in nature of grant of temporary injunction, the fact that the suit is belatedly filed in July, 2019 certainly becomes relevant. The argument that the appellant could not have secured the information online about the impugned international patent application is not sufficient to discard the arguments on the ground of delay and latches. 32. The scope of interference at the hands of Appellate Court against an order refusing to grant discretionary and equitable relief of temporary injunction is limited, as distinguished from an appeal against a final judgment in the suit. It is settled law that unless the discretion exercised by the trial Court is shown to have been exercised in a perverse manner or unless the order is shown to have been illegal, the appellate Court will be slow to interfere with such a discretionary order. We concur with the finding recorded by the learned trial Judge that a prima facie case was not made out by the appellant for grant of interim injunction. In this view of the matter, we are of the considered view that no interference is called for with the impugned order and the appeal deserves to be dismissed. Accordingly, we pass the following order: i) The appeal is dismissed with no order as to the costs; ii) Notwithstanding the dismissal of the appeal, it will be open for the plaintiff-appellant to make appropriate application before the trial Court, as indicated in the order passed on IA Nos. 2/2019 and 3/2019 dated 30th August, 2019; iii) We make it clear that any of the observations made in this order and the findings recorded are only for the purposes of examining the existence of a prima facie case. The suit will be finally decided by the trial Court without being influenced by the said prima facie findings.
O R