w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



M/s. Sri Rengas Avitta Garments, Represented by its Partner, R. Rajaram & Another v/s R. Indira


Company & Directors' Information:- D R GARMENTS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101GJ2005PTC046010

Company & Directors' Information:- R. R. GARMENTS LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51900MH1995PLC095544

Company & Directors' Information:- S G GARMENTS LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101WB2004PLC098193

Company & Directors' Information:- K K P GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65921TZ1994PTC005334

Company & Directors' Information:- N K GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2000PTC107093

Company & Directors' Information:- K. D. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18109WB2005PTC101896

Company & Directors' Information:- G AND A GARMENTS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U18101PB1995PTC016121

Company & Directors' Information:- S. S. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL1996PTC083315

Company & Directors' Information:- G. M. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18109DL2006PTC152683

Company & Directors' Information:- D AND D GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1975PTC007923

Company & Directors' Information:- J S GARMENTS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74900WB2009PTC135262

Company & Directors' Information:- K. B . GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18109WB2011PTC166954

Company & Directors' Information:- A K GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17120DL2015PTC282847

Company & Directors' Information:- D P GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U18101DL2004PTC129479

Company & Directors' Information:- V S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC143084

Company & Directors' Information:- P AND P GARMENTS PVT LTD [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC143556

Company & Directors' Information:- V S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101HR2005PTC068124

Company & Directors' Information:- L. H. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U17121KA2011PTC060761

Company & Directors' Information:- K R GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U17111WB1998PTC087046

Company & Directors' Information:- T & A GARMENTS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U52321TN1993PTC025318

Company & Directors' Information:- P. S. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18204DL2007PTC164238

Company & Directors' Information:- S. A. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17121DL2007PTC165007

Company & Directors' Information:- T S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51494DL1996PTC076668

Company & Directors' Information:- GARMENTS INDIA PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U51909GJ1979PTC003310

Company & Directors' Information:- RAJARAM & CO PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U51909WB1941PTC010586

Company & Directors' Information:- K. S. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2007PTC164404

Company & Directors' Information:- B G GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL2005PTC142488

Company & Directors' Information:- S P GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U18101DL2003PTC120709

Company & Directors' Information:- S T GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18109DL2015PTC277043

Company & Directors' Information:- P L GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17120DL2013PTC248417

Company & Directors' Information:- M. K. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17291DL2007PTC164395

Company & Directors' Information:- R A GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Converted to LLP and Dissolved] CIN = U18101DL2003PTC123385

Company & Directors' Information:- C S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC134787

Company & Directors' Information:- B L GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC136912

Company & Directors' Information:- B D S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC137898

Company & Directors' Information:- T G GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC143392

Company & Directors' Information:- G P S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED. [Active] CIN = U18101DL2006PTC149330

Company & Directors' Information:- G P GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2007PTC161067

Company & Directors' Information:- I B GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909DL2013PTC257044

Company & Directors' Information:- G P S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED. [Active] CIN = U74110DL2006PTC149330

Company & Directors' Information:- A G GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51300DL2013PTC257609

Company & Directors' Information:- V R V GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51311DL2008PTC182256

Company & Directors' Information:- M V GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74899HR2005PTC141797

Company & Directors' Information:- A AND R GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U17120HR2013PTC049037

Company & Directors' Information:- V K GARMENTS PRIVATE LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U18101DL1981PTC012410

Company & Directors' Information:- A S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17212CH1992PTC012350

Company & Directors' Information:- V R GARMENTS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U18101CH1991PTC011345

Company & Directors' Information:- S B GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51311DL2005PTC141954

    Crl.O.P. No. 10508 of 2018 & Crl.MP. Nos. 5387 & 5388 of 2018

    Decided On, 04 April 2018

    At, High Court of Judicature at Madras

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N. PRAKASH

    For the Petitioners: C.S. Dhanasekaran, Advocate. For the Respondent: -------



Judgment Text

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 and 483 Cr.P.C. seeking to call for the records in STC.No.204 of 2018 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Salem, quash the proceedings therein.)

1. This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for the records in STC.No.204 of 2018 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Salem, and quash the proceedings therein.

2. For the sake of convenience, the petitioner and the respondent will be referred to as the accused and the complainant respectively.

3. It is the case of the complainant that she is engaged in the business of Yarn Dyed Woven Fabrics and she is having her office in Ammapet, Salem; that the accused purchased yarn to the tune of Rs.35,07,188/- from her and towards the said liability, the accused issued three cheques, which, when presented by the complainant, were returned on the ground of "payment stopped by the Drawer". The complainant issued a statutory notice dated 22.01.2018 to the accused and in response to the said notice, the accused issued a reply notice dated 07.02.2018, contending that the Yarn was of inferior quality and therefore, he had returned the products back to the complainant and had issued stop payment instructions to his bank.

4. However, the complainant has initiated a prosecution in STC.No.204 of 2018, before the Judicial Magistrate-I, Salem, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the accused. The accused received the summons for his appearance before the trial Court on 12.04.2018 and immediately, he has filed the present quash petition on the ground that the complainant has initiated the present prosecution in Salem District, but the accused is admittedly from Coimbatore District and therefore, the trial Court should have conducted an enquiry in terms of Section 202(1) Cr.P.C. before issuing process and therefore, the proceedings in STC.No.204 of 2018 should be quashed.

5. Heard Mr.Dhanasekaran, learned counsel appearing for the accused.

6. Mr.Dhanasekaran, learned counsel appearing for the accused placed strong reliance upon three judgments of the Supreme Court in (i) Adalat Prasad Vs. Rooplal Jindal and Others reported in [2004(4) CTC 608], (ii) Vijay Dhanuka and Others Vs. Najima Mamtaj and Others [(2014) 14 SCC 638] and (iii) Abhijit Pawar Vs. Hemant Madhukar Nimbalkar and another [AIR 2017 SCC 299].

7. It is true, that under Section 202 Cr.P.C., the Magistrate shall postpone the issue of process against the accused, if the accused is residing at a place beyond the area in which the Magistrate exercises his jurisdiction. In this case, the Magistrate is exercising his jurisdiction in Salem District and the accused, admittedly, is living in the neighbouring Coimbatore District. In the three judgments relied upon by Mr.Dhanasekaran, the Supreme Court has held that an enquiry under Section 202 Cr.P.C is necessary before issuing process. However, all the three cases relied upon by Mr.Dhanasekaran, relate to IPC offences. Of course, the procedure for trial of a private complaint for an IPC offence cannot be different for a trial under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The amendment to Section 202 Cr.P.C was made by Central Act 25 of 2005 in order to curb the practice of private complaints being filed indiscriminately against persons living in faraway places for the purpose of harassing them. In a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the accused and the complainant will most probably know each other. They should have had some transaction inter se and only then a cheque can be issued. Here, the complainant has alleged that the accused has purchased yarn from her and had not made payments. The accused is not a stranger to the complainant and he lives in the neighbouring District. Under the amended provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the complaint can be filed within the jurisdiction of the Court where the Bank of the complainant is situate. In this case, the bank of the complainant is in Salem District and therefore, the complaint was filed within the jurisdictional Court. That apart, unlike prosecution of an offender for an IPC offence by way of a private complaint where pre-prosecution notice is not required, for maintaining a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, pre-prosecution notice is a sine qua non. In this case, the complainant has issued the notice and the accused has also replied to the notice. Therefore, the accused cannot plead that he had not anticipated the prosecution at all and that he was surprised on receiving the summons from the Magistrate.

8. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, the complaint cannot be quashed on the failure of the Magistrate to conduct Section 202(1) Cr.P.C. enquiry, before issuing process. After all, procedural law is a hand maid of justice and breach of a procedural aspect cannot ipso facto vitiate the prosecution. Hence, this ground is rejected as being devoid of merits.

9. Mr.Dhanasekaran, learned counsel for the accused placed strong reliance upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in Adalat Prasad (supra), by contending that the complainant must be examined under Section 200 Cr.P.C and the proof affidavit cannot be accepted. He also submitted that under Section 273 Cr.P.C, the evidence of the witness should be recorded in the presence of the accused. It is true that in paragraph Nos. 13 and 15 of the above said judgment, the Supreme Court has held so. However, in Indian Bank Association Vs. Union of India [(2014) 5 SCC 590] and Meters and Instruments Private Limited and ors. Vs. Kanchan Mehta [(2017) 6 CTC 66], the Supreme Court has issued detailed guidelines as to how a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act should be dealt with by the trial Court in which, the Supreme Court has very clearly held that the complainant can file a proof affidavit and on the strength of the proof affidavit, the complainant can be cross examined by the accused. These Judgments have been circulated to all the Magistrates in the State. Therefore, the Trial Magistrate is bound to follow the Supreme Court guidelines, failing which, it would result in contempt of Court. That apart, Section 145 of the Negotiable Instruments Act permits evidence on affidavit. Hence, the provisions of the Special Act will over rule the general procedure in Section 273 Cr.P.C. Hence, these grounds also fail.

10. At this juncture, Mr.Dhanasekaran, the learned counsel requested this Court that the presence of the petitioner before the trial Court may be dispensed with. Accepting his submission, the petitioner is directed to appear before the trial Court on the next hearing date and on his appearance, he shall be released on bail under Section 436 Cr.P.C on the executing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties on the same day. Thereafter, he is directed to appear before the trial Court for receiving the papers under Section 207 Cr.PC, for questioning under Section 251 Cr.P.C., at the time of questioning under Section 313 Cr.P.C.

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

and at the time of passing judgment. The petitioner shall file an affidavit of undertaking, before the Trial Court that he will not dispute his identity; that the counsel named by him in the affidavit will cross-examine the prosecution witnesses on the day they are examined-in-chief, as directed by the Supreme Court in Vinoth Kumar vs. State of Punjab [2015(1) MLJ (Crl) 288] and that he will not adopt dilatory tactics. If he adopts any dilatory tactics, the trial Court can insist for the presence of the accused by informing the counsel nominated by him. If the accused absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered against him under Section 229-A IPC. 11. The Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed in the above terms. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

25-09-2020 The State of Maharashtra Versus Mallinath Rajaram Harsure High Court of Judicature at Bombay
27-05-2020 Ratan Singh Versus Rajaram High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Indore
18-05-2020 Rajaram Khandige Versus Ramesh Santhanam High Court of Karnataka
20-02-2020 Achuthan & Others Versus Rajaram & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
14-02-2020 Rajaram Gurjar Versus State of Rajasthan High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
10-02-2020 The State of Maharashtra Versus Sanjay Rajaram Mugade & Another High Court of Judicature at Bombay
03-02-2020 K. Rajaram & Another Versus The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution and Corporation Ltd. & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
29-01-2020 K. Rajaram V/S K. Ramakrishnan And Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-01-2020 C.N. Rajaram Versus Tamil Nadu Adi Dravidar Housing & Development Corporation Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-01-2020 Union of India rep. By its Enforcement Officer Enforcement Directorate Chennai Versus M/s. Raiments & Garments International, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-01-2020 M/s The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Represented by the Divisional Manager Versus A.V. Rajaram Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Chennai
03-01-2020 The General Manager, Aleppy Parcel Service, Alappuzha Versus Anil Kumar V., Managing Partner, Wetex Garments, Poovattuparamba, Kozhikode Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
16-12-2019 P. Rajaram Versus P. Muthuraj & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
26-11-2019 V. Rajaram Versus State Represented By the Inspector of Police CBI/SCB Supreme Court of India
22-11-2019 The Management Scotts Garments Limited, Trippur Versus The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Coimbatore & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
14-10-2019 M/s. PJS Knit Garments, Rep.by its Partner, P. Sugansaran & Another Versus The Authorised Officer, Bank of Baroda, Tirupur Main Branch, Tirupur High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-09-2019 Latha Ilangovan Versus Usha Rajaram & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
18-09-2019 Satyanarayan Rajaram Chinta & Others Versus Marvel Realtors & Developers Ltd. & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
22-08-2019 Electronics & Controls Power Systems Private Limited, Rep. herein by its Managing Director, Rajaram Ramamurthy Versus WeP Peripherals Limited, Rep. herein by its Magaing Director, Ram Agarwal High Court of Karnataka
19-08-2019 M.N. Rajaram & Others Versus The Secretary Committee on Co-operative Elections Cases East Central Zone Trichy Central Co-operative Building, Trichy & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-08-2019 M/s. Indo Skins Garments Private Limited, Represented by its Managing Director, N. Thiagarajan, Chennai Versus The Presiding Officer, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
05-08-2019 Janardan Mitharam Jangale Versus Jagannath Rajaram Patil & Another High Court of Judicature at Bombay
26-07-2019 Rajhans R. Vhatkar through Legal Heirs Smt. Kempava R. Vhatkar through Legal Heirs & Others Versus Rajaram Shivaji Pol, (Since deceased) through legal heirs & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
24-07-2019 The Officer In Charge, Sub-Regional Provident Fund Office & Another Versus M/s Godavari Garments Limited Supreme Court of India
03-07-2019 N. Rajaram Versus R. Murali & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
14-06-2019 P. Rajaram Versus The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Kancheepuram & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
23-04-2019 Dharmaji Shankar Shinde & Others Versus Rajaram Shripad Joshi (Dead) Through Lrs. & Others Supreme Court of India
18-04-2019 Dinkar Rajaram Sarap Versus The Chairman/Managing Director, Central Bank of India & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
16-04-2019 Kamal Versus Archana Raju @ Rajaram Bhujbal & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
05-04-2019 The District Collector, Kanchipuram Versus M/s. Gupta Garments, Rep. by its Authorized Signatory Anil Gupta & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-04-2019 M/s. Ginni Garments & Another Versus M/s. Sethi Garments & Others High Court of Punjab and Haryana
04-04-2019 Ginni Garments and Others V/S Sethi Garments and Others. In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
29-03-2019 Narayan Rajaram Amre & Others Versus State of Maharashtra & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
25-03-2019 A. Sarojinidevi Represented by her Authorized Power Agent, A. Raja @ Rajaram Versus R. Arumugam High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-03-2019 The Senior Divisional Mechanical Engineer, Southern Railway, Salem Division & Others Versus M/s. Premier Garments Processing, Rep. by its Proprietor Ibrahim Sha, Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
05-03-2019 Wasan Automotive Pvt. Ltd. & Another Versus Subhash Rajaram Vande In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
25-02-2019 Vinju.Co.Rajaram & Another Versus Giri R. Vasanthi & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
01-02-2019 V. Rajaram Versus The District Collector, Vellore & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
31-01-2019 Manager, Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Ltd., Chennai Versus Bharati Rajaram Mouli & Others High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench At Dharwad
31-01-2019 Rajaram Versus The State of Maharashtra In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
23-01-2019 Rajaram & Others Versus The Sub Divisional Magistrate cum The Revenue Divisional Officer Perambalur District & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
21-12-2018 Batra Garments Pvt. Ltd. Versus New India Assurance Co. Ltd. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
21-12-2018 Goodluck Garments Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & Cus., Surat-II High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
14-12-2018 Rajaram Waman Rane & Others Versus Ramkrishna Mahadev Rane & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
10-12-2018 C. Rajaram Versus CPIO, Jt. Registrar & PIO (Administration) & Others Central Information Commission
06-12-2018 Rajaram Sahu Versus Devendra Kumar Raghuvanshi National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
31-10-2018 C.C.E., Pune-II Versus Rajaram Bapu Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. High Court of Judicature at Bombay
24-10-2018 State of Madhya Pradesh Versus Rajaram @ Raja Supreme Court of India
03-10-2018 Pattherao Narsu Patil @ Rajaram Dnyanu Patil High Court of Judicature at Bombay
24-09-2018 M/s. Premier Garments Processing, Rep. by its Proprietor, Ibrahim Sha, Chennai Versus The Divisional Railway Manager, Salem & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-09-2018 Rajaram Johra Versus Commissioner of Customs High Court of Judicature at Madras
11-09-2018 Shrikant Rajaram Sarmokdam & Others Versus The State of Maharashtra & Another High Court of Judicature at Bombay
10-09-2018 Mangal Rajaram Magar & Others Versus The State of Maharashtra & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
24-08-2018 K. Rajaram & Another Versus State rep. by the Inspector of Police, SPE/CBI/ACB/Chennai & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
14-08-2018 Ram Chandra Singh Versus Rajaram & Others Supreme Court of India
06-08-2018 Sanjeev Rajaram Chimbulkar Versus The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
24-07-2018 Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd., (Now ECGC Limited), Chennai & Another Versus Zoro Garments Private Ltd., Rep.by its Managing Director, N.F. Mogrella High Court of Judicature at Madras
23-07-2018 Rajaram M. Caisukar Versus St. Joseph Chapel, Ansabhat, Mapusa Goa, Represented herein by its President of the Managing Committee Agnelo Braganza & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
19-07-2018 E. Ranjit Kuruvilla Versus Rajaram K. Kinger & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-07-2018 M/s. Rasathe Garments, Rep by its Partner, Virudhunagar Versus The Commercial Tax Officer-I, Virudhunagar High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-07-2018 Bord for Industrial & Financial Reconstruction (B.I.F.R.) Versus Coromandel Garments Ltd. & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
28-06-2018 Kamgar Swa Sadan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. through its Chairman, Sanjay Rajaram Mohite Versus Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Mumbai Division & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
21-06-2018 A. Rajaram Versus P. Chinnakani Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
19-06-2018 Chittuluri Venkata Subramanya Rajaram Versus Kotagiri Shivani & Another In the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad
04-05-2018 M/s. Suvarn Rajaram Bandekar Discretionary Trust Versus Advocate Sunifer Cardozo & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
27-04-2018 Rajaram Appa Patil & Another Versus The State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
20-04-2018 Rajaram Shankar Patwardhan Versus The State of Maharashtra & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
06-04-2018 Rajaram Versus State of Tamil Nadu rep. by Secretary to Government, Commercial Taxes, & Religious Endowments Department Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-04-2018 Kandukuri Garments Versus Inspector of Legal Metrology High Court of Karnataka
28-03-2018 BR & Co., Represented by its Partner, M.R. Rajaram Kumar Versus The Reserve Bank of India, South Zone Office, Rep. by its Zonal Officer, Rajaji Salai, Fort Glacis, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
20-02-2018 Kamal Singh s/o. Rajaram Versus State of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh
31-01-2018 Hanuman Rajaram Mhatre Versus The Commissioner of Police, Thane & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
24-01-2018 Dhondiram Rajaram Salunkhe Versus Dinkar Parshuram Salunkhe & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
09-01-2018 Savitri Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. Versus Ullhas Rajaram Thakkar & Others Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Mumbai
02-01-2018 A. Velumurugan Versus M/s. Sree Shiva Sakthi Garments, Represented by its Partner Venkatachalam, Tiruppur High Court of Judicature at Madras
18-12-2017 L. Rajaram Versus N. Rajesekaran & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
06-12-2017 Rajaram Vijayan Versus Krithika Seshadri High Court of Judicature at Madras
30-11-2017 Rajaram Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
16-11-2017 K. Rajaram Versus The District Collector, Ramnad District & Another Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
14-11-2017 M. Rajaram Versus State represented by Special S.I. of Police, District Crime Branch & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
11-10-2017 Suryankant Rajaram Sankpal Versus Sucheta Suryakant Sankpal & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
28-09-2017 The Land Acquisition Officer, PWD(CELL) & Others Versus Rajaram A. Bandodkar & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
13-09-2017 Shri Suresh s/o. Daulatrao Wirulkar V/S Shri Ganesh s/o. Rajaram Bodkhe In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
11-09-2017 M.S. Rajaram Versus Indian Bank Represented by its Assistant General Manager, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
26-07-2017 Creative Garments Pvt. Ltd V/S C.C.E. & S.T. Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal West Zonal Bench At Ahmedabad
28-06-2017 Rajaram& Another Versus The State Rep by The Inspector of Police, Villupuram High Court of Judicature at Madras
22-06-2017 N. Rajaram Versus T.R. Rathineswaran & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
28-04-2017 The Secretary Virudhunagar Hindu Nadars' Senthikumara Nadar College Committee Virudhunagar Versus Dr. K. Rajaram Pandian & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
16-03-2017 Rajaram Singh Versus The Executive Engineer, Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Khand, Sambhal, Moradabad & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
08-03-2017 The State of Maharashtra Versus Rajaram Yashwant Rasal High Court of Judicature at Bombay
23-02-2017 Gonepalli Rajamallaiah Versus Ragipalli Rajaram @ Pedda Rajaram @ Rajamreddy & Others In the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad
14-02-2017 T.E.S. Badur Rabbani Versus The State of Tamilnadu Rep. By Mr.A. Rajaram, Tirunelveli & Another Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
10-02-2017 The Management of Foundation Garments Pvt. Ltd. Represented by its Managing Director ?Divine Grace? Versus Government of Tamil Nadu Labour & Employment (A1) Department, Represented by its Principal Secretary High Court of Judicature at Madras
03-02-2017 Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. Versus Rajaram & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
25-01-2017 Haresh Kumar Versus Rajaram High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
19-01-2017 R.K. Rajkumar Proprietor M/s. Koghima Garments Versus The Registrar Debts Recovery Tribunal - III Spencer Towers Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
17-01-2017 Kitex Garments Ltd., represented by its Managing Director-Sabu M. Jacob Versus State of Kerala, represented by Principal Secretary To Government, Taxes (H) Department & Another High Court of Kerala
02-01-2017 Sonal Garments V/S Commr. of Cus., Seaport (Import), Chennai Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal South Zonal Bench At Chennai
23-12-2016 S. Subburaj Versus N. Rajaram, Co-operative Thrift Society, Madurai Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
05-12-2016 Rajaram Versus The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court