w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



M/s. Indus Steel & Alloys Ltd. Represented by its Director S.S. Srikanth & Others v/s D. Venkatesh Guptha & Others


Company & Directors' Information:- S A L STEEL LIMITED [Active] CIN = L29199GJ2003PLC043148

Company & Directors' Information:- T S ALLOYS LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27109OR2004PLC009683

Company & Directors' Information:- M M S STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27109TZ1996PTC006849

Company & Directors' Information:- G. O. STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27100PB2007PTC031033

Company & Directors' Information:- INDUS STEEL AND ALLOYS LIMITED [Active] CIN = U85110KA1993PLC014517

Company & Directors' Information:- B P ALLOYS LIMITED [Active] CIN = L27107PB1987PLC007827

Company & Directors' Information:- A TO Z ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27100MH2006PTC160869

Company & Directors' Information:- J M G STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27105BR1992PTC004985

Company & Directors' Information:- V S L ALLOYS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1991PTC046396

Company & Directors' Information:- G. M. ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74120DL2007PTC169855

Company & Directors' Information:- H L STEEL PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27107AS1992PTC003726

Company & Directors' Information:- R D ALLOYS PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27320WB1971PTC027983

Company & Directors' Information:- K V M STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29141DL1988PTC031248

Company & Directors' Information:- A K ALLOYS PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27101PB1989PTC009860

Company & Directors' Information:- K STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27104JH1973PTC000998

Company & Directors' Information:- R. J. STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U28112MH2009PTC193047

Company & Directors' Information:- M M STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27107MH2001PTC131270

Company & Directors' Information:- K L ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U99999PB1989PTC008964

Company & Directors' Information:- B R ALLOYS PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27101WB1995PTC075793

Company & Directors' Information:- P D ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27100PB2004PTC027669

Company & Directors' Information:- B L STEEL PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U51909WB1981PTC034021

Company & Directors' Information:- R K G STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27109DL2004PTC128852

Company & Directors' Information:- K M U ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1994PTC059238

Company & Directors' Information:- M. R. ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27106PB1990PTC010461

Company & Directors' Information:- V B STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U28112MH2010PTC211691

Company & Directors' Information:- I B STEEL COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U28910MH2010PTC211344

Company & Directors' Information:- P R STEEL & ALLOYS PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27109WB2006PTC109377

Company & Directors' Information:- S N ALLOYS PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27101WB1993PTC059587

Company & Directors' Information:- J S C STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27106UP2013PTC061568

Company & Directors' Information:- S A ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27310DL1996PTC081185

Company & Directors' Information:- S. M. STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51101MH2013PTC239811

Company & Directors' Information:- R K P STEEL LTD [Active] CIN = L27109WB1980PLC033206

Company & Directors' Information:- C P STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27100WB2008PTC127447

Company & Directors' Information:- P. B. ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U28910UP2010PTC039384

Company & Directors' Information:- VENKATESH STEEL & ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED [Dissolved] CIN = U70101WB1994PTC065205

Company & Directors' Information:- A. K. J. STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U28112WB2010PTC144880

Company & Directors' Information:- C D STEEL PVT LTD [Under Liquidation] CIN = U27109WB1981PTC034340

Company & Directors' Information:- T M S STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U02710TZ1996PTC007498

Company & Directors' Information:- H. P. ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999MH2012PTC230070

Company & Directors' Information:- M K ALLOYS PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27109PB1992PTC012515

Company & Directors' Information:- P M R STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51102DL2003PTC122675

Company & Directors' Information:- C T STEEL PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27109WB2005PTC106634

Company & Directors' Information:- P G STEEL PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U24111AS1998PTC005409

Company & Directors' Information:- A AND S STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U63090DL1987PTC027835

Company & Directors' Information:- K K ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27106PB1996PTC018111

Company & Directors' Information:- S. B. ALLOYS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U27101PB1990PTC010324

Company & Directors' Information:- VENKATESH CO. LIMITED [Not available for efiling] CIN = U74999RJ1941PLC000085

Company & Directors' Information:- J S STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U52190CT1978PTC001432

Company & Directors' Information:- G A ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45400DL2008PTC175934

Company & Directors' Information:- U M STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27209TN1986PTC013670

Company & Directors' Information:- L C ALLOYS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U27107WB1978PTC031690

Company & Directors' Information:- S G ALLOYS PRIVATE LTD. [Active] CIN = U74899DL1985PTC021870

Company & Directors' Information:- V. S. ALLOYS & STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27100MP2009PTC021808

Company & Directors' Information:- R. N. STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27100WB2007PTC116588

Company & Directors' Information:- S P ALLOYS PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27106PB1990PTC010856

Company & Directors' Information:- P M STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27105MP1982PTC001915

Company & Directors' Information:- M R STEEL (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27100TG2013PTC088808

Company & Directors' Information:- C K STEEL PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U29150WB1975PTC030259

Company & Directors' Information:- C K ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27101DL1998PTC095554

Company & Directors' Information:- K STEEL & COMPANY PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U51909WB1991PTC053960

Company & Directors' Information:- M M ALLOYS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U27101RJ1983PTC002780

Company & Directors' Information:- N I ALLOYS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U27109PB1987PTC007643

Company & Directors' Information:- D R ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27101MH1999PTC118474

Company & Directors' Information:- A N ALLOYS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U27106PB1994PTC015052

Company & Directors' Information:- R A ALLOYS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U27106PB1995PTC016101

Company & Directors' Information:- N S STEEL PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U27106PB1980PTC004266

Company & Directors' Information:- S B ALLOYS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U27106CH1990PTC010538

Company & Directors' Information:- S J ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27101PB1995PTC015964

Company & Directors' Information:- S U ALLOYS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U27104WB1988PTC044767

Company & Directors' Information:- S K R S ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U28113HR2011PTC042687

Company & Directors' Information:- T R ALLOYS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U27106PB1990PTC010906

Company & Directors' Information:- R C STEEL PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U28112AS1980PTC001811

Company & Directors' Information:- G C ALLOYS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U27101PB1995PTC015760

Company & Directors' Information:- K R ALLOYS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U27101HR1981PTC011733

Company & Directors' Information:- B R N ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27101KA1982PTC004759

Company & Directors' Information:- P D STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74899DL1989PTC038426

Company & Directors' Information:- A K STEEL PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U99999DL1961PTC003566

Company & Directors' Information:- H S P STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27100MH2013PTC242983

Company & Directors' Information:- D H STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27109RJ2012PTC039742

Company & Directors' Information:- D AND L ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27310RJ2006PTC023316

Company & Directors' Information:- R A STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909MH2014PTC253625

Company & Directors' Information:- N. V. STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27310DL2009PTC186541

Company & Directors' Information:- K. D. STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U28939DL2012PTC244467

Company & Directors' Information:- R. M. ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U37100DL2016PTC302431

Company & Directors' Information:- A M ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27310GJ2014PTC078387

Company & Directors' Information:- STEEL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U00349KA1958PTC001309

    M.F.A. No. 9532 of 2018 (CPC)

    Decided On, 08 May 2019

    At, High Court of Karnataka

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. SUDHINDRARAO

    For the Appellants: C.M. Poonacha, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, V. Sanjay Krishna, Advocate.



Judgment Text

(Prayer: This MFA is filed Under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the CPC, against the order dated 03.10.2017 passed on I.A.No.1 in O.S.No.6669/2017 on the file of the Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, issuing exparte temporary injunction order on I.A.No.1 and notice on I.A.No.1 and suit summons to defendants.)

1. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for final disposal.

2. This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against the order passed by the learned Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, in O.S.No.6669/2017 dated 03.10.2017 on the application filed by the plaintiff numbered as I.A.No.1.

3. In order to avoid confusion and overlappings, the parties are addressed in accordance with their ranking as held before the trial court.

4. Basically a suit was filed by the plaintiff for permanent injunction to restrain defendants No. 4 to 7 and the persons claiming under them from diverting the business of M/s Indus Steel and Alloys Ltd., and to carry on with the business in the name and style of M/s Indus TMT Industries Ltd., withoutascertaining the fair market value of the suit schedule property in accordance with law and also the prayer as sought for in the plaint.

5. The plaintiff is one Mr. D Venkatesh Guptha and there are seven defendants. The relief urged against the defendants is as stated above. Learned Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, on 3.10.2017 after perusing the records and hearing the learned counsel for the plaintiff passed an order on I.A.No.1 therein and granted exparte temporary injunction restraining the defendants No.4 to 7 and the persons claiming under them from dealing with the name "INDUS" and from using the land and building, plant and machinery and other assets connected to the said organization. Exparte injunction was granted till next date of hearing. Learned trial Judge ordered for temporary injunction in the following manner:

"Issue exparte temporary injunction on I.A.No.1 and notice of I.A.1 and II and suit summons to defendants."

6. The date of order passed by the learned trial judge is 3.10.2017 regard being had to the fact that the suit was filed on the same day.

7. Learned counsel for appellants Sri. C.M. Poonacha would submit that appellants hold an agreement in the form of assignment deed for using the Trade mark and connected intellectual rights. The appeal is preferred by defendant Nos.3 to 7. The order passed by the learned trial judge dated 3.10.2017 is being questioned on two limbs i.e., substantive and procedural aspects

8. Learned counsel Sri. Poonachha, for appellants as well submits that he is not alone, the other defendants are also joined him in presenting the appeal. As the order dated 3.10.2017 is affecting larger interest of the Concern, he would submit that the learned trial Judge has not assigned reasons for granting interim order on 3.10.2017 nor dispensing with the notice to any of the appellants which includes first defendant.

9. Learned counsel would further submit that having granted an order of exparte injunction, learned trial Judge did not adjudicate the matter by hearing both parties within the stipulated period of 30 days. Learned counsel would further submit that the injunction order should have been treated as nonest after the expiry of 30 days by virtue of the principles formulated by the Hon'ble Apex Court. It was also submitted that the plaintiff neither had prima facie case nor balance of convenience in his favour to get the order of injunction. There was no necessity for granting the order as the interest of the plaintiff and defendants was in the form of inseparable mode, particularly, defendant No.3, who has larger interest along with other defendants. He further submits that the plaintiff is bent upon in dragging the defendant in one or the other proceedings. As a matter of fact, Misc. No.25111/2016 was filed against the order that was passed with regard to compromise and disposing of the matter accordingly between the parties, and the said petition is stated to be still pending of course, however, without any exparte orders or interim order. He would also submit that the defendant filed an application for rejecting the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 of C.P.C. in respect of non disclosure of cause of action. However, the said application came to be rejected on 24.9.2018. It is stated that the defendants consist of present lot or group filed CRP No.509/2018 challenging the said order which also stated to be pending having regard to the fact that no interim order are said to be in force against either of the parties.

10. Learned counsel Sri. Sanjaya Krishna for the plaintiff respondent No.1 would submit that when his interest was at stake he filed a suit for injunction. He would further submit that the defendant No.3 and others, who are parties in appeal were acting against the paramount interest of the entire organization and depriving the plaintiff of his rights and he was compelled by the circumstances to file the present suit in O.S.No.6669/2017. He would further submit that, it was the trial court which passed the orders on 3.10.2017 and after service of process the defendants entered appearance on 25.10.2017.

11. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1/plaintiff would further submit that there was no hiccups for disposing of the application. But for the reasons and contingencies such as bifurcation of courts, change of jurisdiction, classification of the case occurred at regular intervals etc., propelled for not disposing of the matter expeditiously, more particularly within the mandated period.

12. Learned counsel for the plaintiff would further submit that he has got the injunction order only to prevent the defendants from misusing the trade mark name, assets, plant and machinery and other belongings of the Concern.

13. Learned counsel for the appellants would submit that Trial Judge did not dispose of the application for injunction by hearing both the parties within the stipulated period as laid down in the case of A Venkatasubbaiah Naidu Vs. S Chellappan and Others, reported in (2000)7 Supreme Court Cases, 695.

14. Learned counsel for the appellant/defendants would submit that the order dated 3.10.2017 is literally preventing the larger interest of the Concern. The result of the said order is stated to be a grinding halt of the business due to non-working of the plant and machinery. Consequently, the machineries are undergoing depreciation without any output. The question that would arise at the stage of hearing is that the suit was filed on 3.10.2017 along with I.A.No.1 seeking grant of temporary injunction against the defendants stated above. The order was passed on 3.10.2017. However, the application for vacating injunction along with written statement were filed by the defendants on 25.10.2017. If that is taken into consideration, it was the bounden duty on the part of the Court to dispose of the application within the mandated period, but that did not happen. Of course, it is seen that there has been several ups and down in the proceedings that paved the way for non disposal of the application.

15. Sri. M Poonacha, learned counsel for the appellants would submit, earlier Writ Petition Nos.55338-342/2017 were filed before this Court on 3.12.2017, wherein the appellants/defendants urged with regard to the pendency of the application or its non-disposal within the mandated period as held by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Challappan's case. However, the petitions came to be disposed of with a direction to dispose of the application filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 within the time frame as indicated in the Code of Civil Procedure.

16. It was also brought to my notice that the Court was sandwiched one application under Order VII rule 11 of C.P.C. and transferred all cases on account of change of jurisdiction and the related facts. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, learned counsel for the defendants/appellants relied on the decision reported in 2018 SCC Online Karnataka 626, in addition to Chellappan's case.

17. Incidentally, learned counsel for the plaintiff also relied upon Chellappan's case which is relied upon by the learned counsel for the defendants/appellants to submit that the court should have disposed of the application within the mandated period. However, the said submission was resisted by the learned counsel for the plaintiff claiming that there was no occasion for procrastination of the proceedings at the instance of the Court. The effect of the order is that the plaintiff holds the order against the defendants and others from using the trade mark, plant and machinery relating to Indus Steel and Alloys Ltd.,

18. Learned counsel for the plaintiff would submit that if the injunction order is vacated, the result would be that the defendants will start manufacturing process by using the name, trade mark and other assets connected to the Concern, in which event, it amounts to disposal of the suit without analyzing the merits.

19. It is also the grievance of the defendants that if the present order is allowed to continue, it would affect the interest of the entire Concern and it is a punishment without trial for no fault of the defendants.

20. Insofar as grant of injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of CPC is concerned, it is the domain of the trial court in deciding the application whether there is prima-facie case, balance of convenience and hardship that are going to be caused to either of the parties in granting or refusing temporary injunction. The yardstick is not on the alternative basis of the said factors. On the other hand, the court has to satisfy the presence of the said factors. It is not the case that the entire pleadings are to be cross-examined before passing the order. But, there should be a mention as to need and justifiable and compelling circumstances on the basis of the documents and the pleadings for granting interlocutory order of temporary injunction. Yes, there are several factors that dominated which are said to have been crept in the middle and the matter was not disposed of. The question is not what prevented or interrupted, the process should go on and the ends of justice must be the object, whether though an order is in favour or against the parties.

21. The suit is filed on 3.10.2017 and order was passed on the same day and the same was in force till next date of hearing or until further orders. However, it appears that the matter was advanced and written statement along with objections were filed on 25.10.2017. It is not the question that how many Judges or courts or jurisdiction are changed. It is not the question of successor putting the responsibility on the predecessor or the predecessor transferring the responsibility to the Successor.

22. It is to be borne in mind that whether the Presiding Officer or succeeding Officer of the first court or subsequent court or newly constituted court or designated court or special court or names would change but the issues remain consistent and it was up to them to discharge their duties without waiting for or relying on the reasons aforesaid.

23. The direction issued by this Court in W.P.Nos.55338-342/2017 was also not considered. In totality, the application- I.A.No.1 filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 did not get any light of adjudication before the trial court. However, it is high time for the trial court and now onwards, it shall get alerted about its responsibility and dispose of the application better later than never and

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

avoid the effect of miscarriage of justice would occur. 24. Insofar as the non-disposal of the application and the effects of such inaction is left to the administrative side of this Court. However, this court is bound to go ahead for disposal of the case as the courts are running Summer vacation and re-opening on 27.5.2019. 25. Learned counsel for both parties submit that arguments were heard for several reasons and the matter was posted for orders. 26. In the over all circumstances of the case, the trial court shall dispose of the matter within a period of 10 days from reopening day of the courts i.e., on 27.5.2019 without seeking any request for further extension of time considering the nature and circumstances of the case. 27. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of with a direction to the trial court to dispose of the application within a period of 10 days from the reopening day of the Courts i.e., 27.05.2019. However, the injunction order granted shall continue till disposal of the said application. In case of non-disposal of the case within the said period i.e., 06.06.2019, either seeking adjournment by the plaintiff or the defendants, the order dated 03.10.2017 shall come to an end and the accountability shall be on the trial court.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

17-09-2020 Ramchandra Anant Sinai Rataboli Versus Manica Sinai Rataboli @ Manik Venkatesh Nayak In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
16-09-2020 Balasore Alloys Limited Versus Medima LLC Supreme Court of India
09-06-2020 Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Versus Steel Authority of India, Chhattisgarh & Another High Court of Chhattisgarh
04-06-2020 Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. Versus State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. & Others High Court of Delhi
02-06-2020 The Board of Trustees for the Port of Kolkata & Another Versus Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd. & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
01-06-2020 Venkatesh Versus State by Doddaballapura, Represents by HC Public Prosecutor, Bengaluru High Court of Karnataka
12-05-2020 Damodar Valley Corporation, having its office at DVC Towers, Through its Chairman Versus M/s. Gautam Ferro Alloys, a unit of M/s. Bihar Foundary & Casting Ltd., Through its Managing Director Dr. Hari Krishan Budhia & Others High Court of Jharkhand
08-05-2020 M/s. Suryadev Alloys & Power Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Authorised Signatory, Govind Gagoria & Another Versus M/s. Shri Govindaraja Textiles Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by its Director, Aruppukottai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-05-2020 Venkatesh Narasimhan Versus V. Sujatha High Court of Delhi
29-04-2020 Jindal Steel & Power Limited Versus State Tradings Corporation Of India Limited & Others High Court of Delhi
12-03-2020 K. Venkatesh Versus Swamy Vivekananda Educational Society High Court of for the State of Telangana
04-03-2020 M/s. Commercial Steel Co. Versus ASC Sales Tax High Court of for the State of Telangana
28-02-2020 M/.GBR Metals Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Director Venkatesh Rathi Versus The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Poeddunaickenpet Assessment Circle High Court of Judicature at Madras
26-02-2020 State Bank of India Stressed Assets Management Branch- II, Kolkata Versus Maithan Alloys Limited, Kolkatta & Others National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
25-02-2020 G.S. Venkatesh Versus State of Karnataka Chikkaballapura Police Circle, Chikkaballapura High Court of Karnataka
25-02-2020 G.S. Venkatesh Versus State of Karnataka Chikkaballapura Police Circle, Chikkaballapura High Court of Karnataka
24-02-2020 Panch Tatva Promoters Pvt. Ltd. Versus GPT Steel Industries Ltd. (Through Resolution Professional) & Others National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
13-02-2020 The Commissioner of Central Excise, O/o. The Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Salem Versus M/s. JSW Steel Ltd., M/s. JSW Power Ltd., Pottaneri, Mecheri High Court of Judicature at Madras
12-02-2020 M/s. Steel Authority of India Ltd., Salem Steel Plant, Represented by its Deputy General Manager, Finance & Accounts, K. Sivaguru, Versus The Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
07-02-2020 C.S. Venkatesh Versus A.S.C. Murthy (D) By Lrs. & Others Supreme Court of India
05-02-2020 M/s. Texcel International Pvt. Ltd., Sengundram Industrial Area (Near Ford India Ltd.,), Chengalpattu Versus M/s. Chennai Steel Tubes, Rep.by one of its Partner, G. Bhavanishankar High Court of Judicature at Madras
05-02-2020 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-2 Versus M/s. JSW Steel Ltd. (Successor on amalgamation of JSW Ispat Steel Ltd.) High Court of Judicature at Bombay
03-02-2020 P. Uttam Kumar Goud Versus Jagini Venkatesh High Court of for the State of Telangana
30-01-2020 State of Odisha & Others Versus M/s. Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. & Others Supreme Court of India
22-01-2020 Maharashtra Seamless Limited Versus Padmanabhan Venkatesh & Others Supreme Court of India
21-01-2020 Jindal Steel & Power Limited, Raigarh & Another Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
13-01-2020 M/s. Steel Authority Of India Ltd. Versus Kamladityya Construction Pvt Ltd. High Court of Jharkhand
06-01-2020 M/s. Rukminirama Steel Rollings Pvt. Ltd. & Others Versus The State of Goa Through the Chief Secretary, Secretariat & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
03-01-2020 Venkatesh Nayak Versus CPIO-1: Department of Economic Affairs & Others Central Information Commission
31-12-2019 M/s. Sai Krishna Alloys, Rep. by its Partner, N. Anbalagan Versus The Superintending Engineer (Metro) Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Coimbatore Electricity Distribution Circle, Coimbatore High Court of Judicature at Madras
24-12-2019 Shyam Steel Industries Limited Versus Shyam Sel & Power Limited & Another High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
16-12-2019 Selva's Steel Private Limited Versus The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
10-12-2019 Kanthamma & Others Versus V. Venkatesh High Court of Karnataka
10-12-2019 Shalimar Iron and Steel Private Limited, Ramgarh Cantt. through its Director Rafat Praveen Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others High Court of Jharkhand
09-12-2019 M. Venkatesh Versus State of Telangana & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
05-12-2019 M/s. Bhuwalka Steel Industries Ltd & Another Versus Union of India & Others Supreme Court of India
04-12-2019 M/s. Hindustan Steel Works Construction Limited, Rep. by its General Manager, V.S. Prasad Versus Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Project Director, Tamil Nadu Road Sector Project, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
02-12-2019 Electrosteel Steel Ltd. & Others Versus M/s. STP Ltd. High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
19-11-2019 M/s. Akshayah Global School, Represented by its Founder-Chairman, T.K. Venkatesh Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, School Education Department, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-11-2019 B. Basappa & Another Versus J.S.W. Steel Ltd., Bellary High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench At Dharwad
06-11-2019 Venkatesh Reddy Versus Bengaluru Development Authority Kumara Park West High Court of Karnataka
04-11-2019 JSW Steel Limited Versus Government of Karnataka High Court of Karnataka
02-11-2019 Shivaiah Versus Ashok Venkatesh Shet High Court of Karnataka
25-10-2019 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) - 1 Versus NRA Iron & Steel Pvt. Ltd. Supreme Court of India
24-10-2019 Jindal Steel & Power Limited Versus Arun Kumar Jagatramka National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
22-10-2019 Steel Authority of India Limited Central Marketing Organization Through Assistant General Manager (Marketing) Regional Office, Maharashtra Versus Lalit Agrawal & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
22-10-2019 Vanit Gupta & Another Versus Delta Iron & Steel Company P. Ltd. & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
18-10-2019 N. Venkatesh Versus Joint Commissioner Rajarajeshwarinagar Region High Court of Karnataka
14-10-2019 JSW Steel Ltd. Versus Mahender Kumar Khandelwal & Another National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
11-10-2019 State of Karnataka by Mahadevapura Police Station Versus B.Y. Venkatesh @ Muthuraju High Court of Karnataka
10-10-2019 S.R. Venkatesh Babu Versus The Registrar, City Civil Court & Others High Court of Karnataka
03-10-2019 The Secretary to Government, Highways & Minor Ports (HL.1) Department, Secretariat, Chennai Versus S.R. Venkatesh High Court of Judicature at Madras
11-09-2019 Krishna Venkatesh & Another Versus Balbhim Malvankar & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
05-09-2019 M/s. S.S. Steel Industry Versus M/s. Shri Guru Hargobind Steels High Court of Delhi
04-09-2019 A.S. Venkatesh Versus The Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
21-08-2019 Ramesh Kumar Vishwakarma & Others Versus Steel Authority of India Limited Through Its Managing Director, Bhilai & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
13-08-2019 C.A. Rafeek, Managing Partner, M/s. Alchemy Alloys, Erattupetta Versus Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd., Vydryudi Bhavanam, Thiruvananthapuram, Represented by Its Chairman & Others High Court of Kerala
01-08-2019 M/S Mamta Steel India Pvt. Ltd. Peepur Amethi Throu, Director & Another Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Civil Lines Allahabad High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
31-07-2019 M/s. Steel Authority of India Ltd. Versus Exalt Service Pvt. Ltd. High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
29-07-2019 M/S Vishwaleela Steel Tube Industries & Others Versus State of U.P. & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
16-07-2019 Asset Reconstruction Company India Limited, Mumbai Versus Abhishek Steel & Power Limited rep. by its Managing Director, Gopal Agarwal, Hyderabad & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
05-07-2019 The Director, Steel Authority of India Limited Versus Ispat Khandan Janta Mazdoor Union Supreme Court of India
05-07-2019 Steel Authority of India Limited & Another Versus Jaggu & Others Supreme Court of India
05-07-2019 Thulja Traders, Rep.by its Power Agent, S.R. Guruprasad Versus M/s. Venkatesh Trading Company, Rep. by its Partner, Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
18-06-2019 M/s. Steel Complex Limited, Wisco Manor, Calicut, Represented by The Managing Director Versus K.G. Subramania Iyer High Court of Kerala
13-06-2019 M/s. India Metal One Steel Plate Processing Private Limited Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle – 2 (2) High Court of Judicature at Madras
29-05-2019 Venkatesh Babu & Another Versus Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Another High Court of Karnataka
21-05-2019 Venkatesh Versus State By SHO, Represented by State Public Prosecutor High Court of Karnataka
17-05-2019 Amar Alloys Pvt Limited (Regd) Versus State Bank of India High Court of Punjab and Haryana
13-05-2019 Adwaita Prasad Biswal Versus Rourkela Steel Plant High Court of Orissa
09-05-2019 Dr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Director (Retired), Geological Survey of India, Shillong Versus The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of steel & Mines, Department of Mines, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
08-05-2019 M/s. Steel Authority of India Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Raipur Supreme Court of India
25-04-2019 Sadashiv Yashwant Kumbhar & Others Versus M/s. S.J. Iron and Steel Pvt. Ltd. High Court of Judicature at Bombay
25-04-2019 Venkatesh Naik Versus State of Karnataka, Rept. by State Public Prosecutor High Court of Karnataka
25-04-2019 Union of India & Others Versus M/s. RVG Metals & Alloys Pvt. Ltd. & Others High Court of Delhi
24-04-2019 Hari Steel & General Industries Ltd. & Another Versus Daljit Singh & Others Supreme Court of India
18-04-2019 Steel Authority of India Limited, Unit: Iisco Steel Plant Versus Workmen of Steel Authority of India Limited & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
09-04-2019 Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Bangalore Versus M/s. Jsw Steel Ltd. (Formerly Known As Jindal Vijayanagar Steel Ltd.) Supreme Court of India
08-04-2019 M/s. Emkay Alloys (P) Ltd., Erode District Versus The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (O&M), Gobichettipalayam, Erode District & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
05-04-2019 Prema Venkatesh Versus Deputy Commissioner, Chickaballapura District & Others High Court of Karnataka
04-04-2019 M/s. Paripooranam Steel Traders, Chennai Versus The Assistant Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-04-2019 M/s. Steel Park, Represented by its Partner A.S. Hasan Adbulcader, Valliyoor Versus The Commercial Tax Officer, Nanguneri Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
03-04-2019 Venkatesh Versus State by Inspector of Police High Court of Judicature at Madras
03-04-2019 Amit Mines Private Limited Versus Maithan Alloys Limited & Another High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
02-04-2019 M/s. Swastika Steel & Allied Products Pvt. Ltd. Versus CCE, Kol-II Customs Excise amp Service Tax Appellate Tribunal East Regional Bench Kolkata
01-04-2019 Steel Authority of India Limited & Another Versus International Commerce Limited & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
01-04-2019 M/s. Obulapuram Mining Company Pvt. Ltd. Versus M/s. JSW Steel Limited High Court of Judicature at Bombay
26-03-2019 Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai II Commissionerate, Chennai Versus M/s. Kanishk Steel Industries Ltd., Gummidipoondi & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-03-2019 MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S A & Another Versus BRG Iron & Steel Company Private Limited & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
13-03-2019 Venkatesh Versus The State, Rep. by Inspector of Police, Salem High Court of Judicature at Madras
12-03-2019 State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. Versus M/s. Global Steel Holding Limited & Others Supreme Court of India
08-03-2019 Kamal Kumar Bhuwalka, Managing Director M/S Bhuwalka Castings & Forgings Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Known As M/s. Bhuwalka Steel Industries Ltd) & Others Versus C.C.E. Bangalore Customs Excise amp Service Tax Appellate Tribunal South Zonal Bench At Bangalore
08-03-2019 Kamal Kumar Bhuwalka, Managing Director, M/s. Bhuwalka Castings & Forgings Pvt. Ltd (Formerly Known As M/s. Bhuwalka Steel Industries Ltd) & Others Versus C.C.E.-Bangalore Customs Excise amp Service Tax Appellate Tribunal South Zonal Bench At Bangalore
07-03-2019 Prithvi Ferro Alloys Pvt Limited & Others Versus Bank of Baroda & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
07-03-2019 Sahu Shivaji Versus Ma Sakti Steel Traders Proprietor Sujeet Jaiswal High Court of Chhattisgarh
05-03-2019 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 3 Versus Patel Alloy Steel Co. Pvt. Ltd. Supreme Court of India
01-03-2019 Govt. of India & Another Versus P. Venkatesh Supreme Court of India
28-02-2019 Steel Authority of India Ltd. Versus M/s. Seaspray Shipping Co. Ltd. High Court of Delhi
25-02-2019 Punjab National Bank Versus Indian Steel Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
19-02-2019 Venkatesh Coke & Power Limited & Others Versus M/s. Otto India Private Limited, Rep. by its Partner A. Naraynan High Court of Judicature at Madras