w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Moti Lal @ Moti Lal Patwa v/s Union of India, Ministry of Finance through the Director, Enforcement Directorate, Delhi & Another


Company & Directors' Information:- L & T FINANCE LIMITED [Amalgamated] CIN = U65990MH1994PLC083147

Company & Directors' Information:- S P FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65990MH1979PTC021790

Company & Directors' Information:- V L S FINANCE LIMITED [Active] CIN = L65910DL1986PLC023129

Company & Directors' Information:- L R N FINANCE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65921TN1992PLC089288

Company & Directors' Information:- S M FINANCE LTD [Active] CIN = L65999TG1984PLC004526

Company & Directors' Information:- J R D FINANCE LTD [Active] CIN = L65999WB1993PLC058107

Company & Directors' Information:- B R D FINANCE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65910KL1995PLC009430

Company & Directors' Information:- T C I FINANCE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65920MH1973PLC017042

Company & Directors' Information:- A. V. B. FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED. [Active] CIN = U65993DL1992PTC049818

Company & Directors' Information:- S M L FINANCE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65910KL1996PLC010648

Company & Directors' Information:- S B FINANCE PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U65921TG1988PTC008268

Company & Directors' Information:- INDIA FINANCE LTD. [Active] CIN = L65110WB1984PLC050214

Company & Directors' Information:- J J FINANCE CORPORATION LTD [Active] CIN = L65921WB1982PLC035092

Company & Directors' Information:- G V S FINANCE PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U65921TG1988PTC008269

Company & Directors' Information:- G T P FINANCE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65921TZ1991PLC003149

Company & Directors' Information:- S R K FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65910UP1994PTC016038

Company & Directors' Information:- R N FINANCE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1988PLC034289

Company & Directors' Information:- J R D FINANCE LTD [Active] CIN = U65999WB1993PLC058107

Company & Directors' Information:- L N FINANCE LTD [Active] CIN = U65923WB1991PLC052876

Company & Directors' Information:- R K FINANCE LTD [Active] CIN = L65921WB1983PLC035896

Company & Directors' Information:- J S M FINANCE PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U74140MP1995PTC009542

Company & Directors' Information:- I & D FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65191TN1991PTC021369

Company & Directors' Information:- UNION FINANCE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65910GJ1994PLC023717

Company & Directors' Information:- L N FINANCE PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U65929AS1992PTC003766

Company & Directors' Information:- T P D FINANCE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U67120RJ1994PLC008051

Company & Directors' Information:- R G L FINANCE COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1983PTC015809

Company & Directors' Information:- S K B FINANCE LIMITED [Amalgamated] CIN = U65999WB1996PLC082317

Company & Directors' Information:- J V FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74899DL1985PTC067873

Company & Directors' Information:- L C J FINANCE PVT. LTD. [Active] CIN = U65921WB1995PTC068809

Company & Directors' Information:- T T FINANCE LIMITED [Amalgamated] CIN = U67120DL1986PLC023168

Company & Directors' Information:- M M V R FINANCE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65921TZ1997PLC007705

Company & Directors' Information:- D B FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65191TN1989PTC016705

Company & Directors' Information:- C H P FINANCE PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U65921PB1992PTC012788

Company & Directors' Information:- S L B P FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1990PTC041694

Company & Directors' Information:- R S FINANCE PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U65191WB1988PTC044144

Company & Directors' Information:- I C FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65921UP1989PTC011236

Company & Directors' Information:- V K FINANCE PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U67120WB1991PTC052140

Company & Directors' Information:- C AND N FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65921DL1998PTC094290

Company & Directors' Information:- C D R FINANCE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65910TG1995PLC022237

Company & Directors' Information:- J R FINANCE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65921PB1996PLC017699

Company & Directors' Information:- I C S FINANCE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65921TZ1987PLC001991

Company & Directors' Information:- D D S FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65910DL1996PTC076165

Company & Directors' Information:- D A S FINANCE PVT LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65921PB1993PTC012888

Company & Directors' Information:- U B FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74899DL1992PTC051300

Company & Directors' Information:- V L G FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65910AP1997PTC027952

Company & Directors' Information:- E M S FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65921TZ1986PTC001789

Company & Directors' Information:- S. F. FINANCE COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65921PB1996PTC018702

Company & Directors' Information:- D S L FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65921TG1996PTC023898

Company & Directors' Information:- S R K C FINANCE LIMITED [Amalgamated] CIN = U65999TZ1989PLC002445

Company & Directors' Information:- H A FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65993DL1987PTC027064

Company & Directors' Information:- V V A FINANCE LTD [Active] CIN = U65993WB1984PLC037171

Company & Directors' Information:- Y B FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65921CH1996PTC017745

Company & Directors' Information:- M S R FINANCE PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U65191TN1989PTC016789

Company & Directors' Information:- S S P FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65191TN1987PTC014526

Company & Directors' Information:- C. LAL LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909HR2012PLC046499

Company & Directors' Information:- I FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED [Active] CIN = U67110DL2011PLC212268

Company & Directors' Information:- H AND Z FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U67190MH1995PTC093153

Company & Directors' Information:- Y AND K FINANCE COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74899DL1985PTC019837

Company & Directors' Information:- S L P FINANCE PRIVATE LTD. [Strike Off] CIN = U65923DL1985PTC021970

Company & Directors' Information:- V M FINANCE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65910PB1996PLC018339

Company & Directors' Information:- D S K FINANCE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65910UP1988PLC010317

Company & Directors' Information:- G B V FINANCE COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65110UP1988PTC010219

Company & Directors' Information:- B H FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65922KA1995PTC018390

Company & Directors' Information:- M .R .S . FINANCE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65929DL1995PLC067184

Company & Directors' Information:- H D FINANCE LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U67120DL1986PLC023675

Company & Directors' Information:- P R K FINANCE P LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U65191TN1995PTC033478

Company & Directors' Information:- T AND C FINANCE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U67120RJ1996PLC012576

Company & Directors' Information:- MOTI PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U74899DL1961PTC003372

Company & Directors' Information:- W S FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65192UP1996PTC020243

Company & Directors' Information:- S A C FINANCE COMPANY PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U65999WB1985PTC039002

Company & Directors' Information:- C C FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65191TN1997PTC037805

Company & Directors' Information:- S R B FINANCE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65910UP1988PLC010045

Company & Directors' Information:- P V FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65993DL1987PTC027270

Company & Directors' Information:- R V S FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65990KA1995PTC018436

Company & Directors' Information:- P AND B FINANCE PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U99999MH1986PTC038841

Company & Directors' Information:- A E FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65999TZ1990PTC002905

Company & Directors' Information:- MOTI PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U67120TN1943PTC001460

Company & Directors' Information:- L R FINANCE COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65910UP1988PTC009758

Company & Directors' Information:- S B M FINANCE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65921PB1994PLC014374

Company & Directors' Information:- T A S FINANCE PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U65191TN1990PTC018654

Company & Directors' Information:- D AND O FINANCE COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74899DL1993PTC054788

Company & Directors' Information:- H R P FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65921PB1995PTC015715

Company & Directors' Information:- P T R FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65191TN1989PTC016795

Company & Directors' Information:- B & S FINANCE PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U65191TN1988PTC015491

Company & Directors' Information:- H S B FINANCE PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U67120RJ1996PTC012119

Company & Directors' Information:- M. J. S. FINANCE COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65921PB1971PTC003049

Company & Directors' Information:- A R FINANCE PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U65921PB1989PTC009778

Company & Directors' Information:- K G FINANCE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65910TZ1982PLC001219

Company & Directors' Information:- S AND Z FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65923PN1997PTC106520

Company & Directors' Information:- H S N FINANCE PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U67120PB1993PTC013900

Company & Directors' Information:- G N FINANCE PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U65990MH1981PTC024294

Company & Directors' Information:- C S FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65910GJ1987PTC009799

    Criminal Miscellaneous No. 73052 of 2019

    Decided On, 11 June 2020

    At, High Court of Judicature at Patna

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH

    For the Petitioner: Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Advocate, Hemant Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: S.D. Sanjay, ASG, Ms. Kanak Verma, CGC.



Judgment Text


1. The matter has been heard via video conferencing due to lockdown imposed on account of the COVID-19 pandemic.

2. Heard Mr. Ramakant Sharma, learned senior counsel, along with Mr. Hemant Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S. D. Sanjay, learned Additional Solicitor General (hereinafter referred to as 'ASG'), along with Ms. Kanak Verma, learned Central Government Counsel for the Union of India - Opposite Parties.

3. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Special Trial No. (PMLA) 2 of 2018 under Section 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act').

4. The allegation against the petitioner is of money laundering by depositing demonetized notes of more than Rs. 44 crores in accounts of various persons, including his own, and thereafter transferring it through RTGS into accounts of various other persons at Delhi and Kolkata, mostly in fictitious accounts.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is nowhere involved in the entire episode as it was through the accounts of other persons namely Shashi Kumar and Rajesh Kumar in whose accounts huge amounts of cash were deposited post demonetization and from there, through RTGS, the amounts were transferred into various other accounts. It was submitted that on the basis of complaint lodged by Shashi Kumar and Rajesh Kumar, that fraud had been committed in their accounts, as without having made any cash deposits, transactions of heavy amounts were reflected in their accounts, police cases were registered and thereafter the Enforcement Directorate came into the picture leading to the present case. It was submitted that there is nothing to connect the petitioner to such heavy cash deposits and the petitioner himself is the Managing Director of MDI Cotton Mills Private Limited located at Manpur in Gaya and his turn over is in crores and only his money was being deposited in his accounts and the same have also been shown in the Income Tax returns. Learned counsel submitted that as per the allegation, the petitioner after depositing the cash got the same transferred through RTGS to various accounts at the dictate of Dhiraj Jain and Niraj Jain, who were based in Delhi. Learned counsel submitted that Dhiraj Jain has been granted bail by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 6262 of 2019 vide order dated 19.09.2019. It was submitted that the petitioner is alleged to have transferred the money at the behest of Dhiraj Jain and he has been granted bail and, thus, the petitioner also is entitled to such indulgence. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner has given his statement to the authorities and all his papers are presently in the custody of the Special Court and, thus, there cannot be any tampering by him. It was further submitted that the petitioner having a running mill, there was no chances of him absconding. Learned counsel submitted that only on presumption and the statement of the Bank officials, who have tried to falsely implicate the petitioner, he has been made accused. Learned counsel contended that Shashi Kumar and Rajesh Kumar, who have filed cases that there was fraud committed in their accounts have not taken the name of the petitioner and further that the petitioner has no concern with those persons and, thus, could not have deposited such money as it was not in his knowledge with regard to accounts maintained by them. Learned counsel submitted that because the petitioner has good business and there is heavy transaction in his account, he has been made a scapegoat by the authorities to hide their misconduct without the petitioner being involved in such transactions. Learned counsel further submitted that though there is restriction under Section 45 of the Act but the same does not bar the Court from considering and granting bail if the Court is satisfied that the petitioner may be innocent and that there is no chance of tampering with the evidence. It was submitted that in the present case, both the conditions are satisfied and most importantly, the person namely Dhiraj Jain, who is said to be giving instructions to the petitioner with regard to transfer of money, having been granted bail, the case of the petitioner stands on a better footing. It was further submitted that details of the accounts in whose favour monies were transferred have not been given and only references have been given without there being any legal evidence relating to the same. It was submitted that even charges have not been framed and, thus, there is little scope of the trial commencing in the near future, much less, the same being concluded and unnecessarily, the petitioner is languishing in jail. Learned counsel submitted that in the complaint itself, it has been written that the petitioner, Dhiraj Jain and two others were in touch right from the beginning and, thus, the case of Dhiraj Jain stands on a similar footing to that of the petitioner.

6. Mr. S D Sanjay, learned ASG submitted that the petitioner is in fact the main player in the whole episode. It was submitted that he is the person who actually brought the demonetized cash to the Bank where it was allowed to be deposited in the accounts of others persons without their knowledge and subsequently, they were transferred through RTGS to other accounts. It was submitted that Shashi Kumar and Rajesh Kumar had given blank cheques to the Bank for being used in case they defaulted in the loan repayment and, having been given in good faith, were misused, in connivance with the Bank officials by using them for RTGS transfer from their accounts to various other accounts. It was submitted that under such circumstances, it was the petitioner who had laundered the demonetized illegal cash into legal cash through the mode of depositing it in connivance with the Bank officials and then getting the same transferred to various other accounts, most of which were fictitious. Learned counsel submitted that even from the account of MTI Cotton Mills Private Limited, of which the petitioner is the Managing Director, more than 13 crore rupees were transferred into various accounts of persons and firms which have been found to be fictitious. Learned counsel submitted that the level of satisfaction of the Court as contemplated in Section 45 of the Act is of a high level which has also been explained by a three Judges bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rohit Tandon v. Enforcement Directorate, since reported as AIR 2017 SC 5309, the relevant being at paragraph no. 15 onwards. It was further submitted that similarly the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gautam Kundu v. Directorate of Enforcement (Prevention of Money-Laundering Act), since reported as (2015) 16 SCC 1, has also indicated broad parameters for grant of bail. Learned counsel submitted that in those cases, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has upheld the rejection of bail by the High Court and has reiterated the law that on the basis of materials, the Court has to be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the petitioner is not guilty of such offence and is not likely to commit any offence while on bail. In the present case, learned counsel submitted that in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the opposite parties, materials have been brought on record, most importantly, the statement given by the petitioner himself under Section 50 of the Act, which is admissible in law, with regard to his complicity in the entire act where he admits that he had deposited demonetized notes in such accounts, including his own. Learned counsel submitted that even otherwise, there has been corroboration of the petitioner being in regular telephonic contact with Dhiraj Jain and other accused persons, from their CDRs. Learned counsel submitted that under such circumstances, the obvious presumption, in the absence of there being any explanation as to how such huge demonetized notes came in the possession of the petitioner which he has deposited, the onus is on him to rebut and show that the same was bona fide, failing which, for the present at least, there is a presumption in law that the petitioner is guilty under the Act. Thus, learned counsel submitted that there being such strong evidence against him which is based on his own statement under Section 50 of the Act, the petitioner cannot be said to be innocent or not involved in the crime alleged. It was submitted that in such background, the first condition under Section 45, that the Court has to reach to a conclusion, maybe tentative and only for the purposes of considering the prayer for bail and without the same being prejudicial to the petitioner in trial, but none the less the same being essential, that the person was not involved in crime under the Act, is not satisfied. Further, learned counsel submitted that with regard to the petitioner not being likely to commit any offence, in the present case, it was very much possible that the petitioner, after coming out, would be in a position to influence the witnesses, more so since the prosecution evidence has yet not been recorded. Thus, according to learned counsel, even the second criterion under Section 45 of the Act is not satisfied and goes against the petitioner. Learned counsel submitted that the Court may also take note of the larger ramification, as has been indicated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Y. S. Jagan Mohan Reddy v. CBI, since reported as (2013) 7 SCC 439, where it has been held that economic offences constitute a class apart and need to be visited with a different approach in the matter of bail. It was submitted that the present case would amount to fraud on the public exchequer since notes which were demonetized with the objective that they should go out of circulation have been made legitimate by such illegal act of the petitioner. Learned counsel submitted that the case of Dhiraj Jain is different compared to the petitioner for the reason that Dhiraj Jain only gave instructions as to where the money was to be sent, but the actual act of getting demonetized cash being made legal by depositing it into the Bank was solely the act of the petitioner. It was submitted that only after the illegal demonetized notes were made legal by showing them to be deposited in various accounts of other persons, which was done only by the petitioner, the role of Dhiraj Jain, will start as he has only instructed as to where such white money should be transferred. Thus, it was contended that there cannot be any similarity between the case of Dhiraj Jain and the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that recently the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Diary No. 5150 of 2020 by order dated 03.06.2020 in the case of Directorate of Enforcement New Delhi v. Upendra Rai has issued notice and stayed the operation of the order of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court by which bail was gra

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

nted to Upendra Rai in a case under the Act and has directed that if Upendra Rai has not already been released, he shall not be released. 7. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the Court finds force in the arguments of learned ASG, and is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 8. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. 9. However, the Court, taking note of the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that trial be directed to be concluded within a fixed time-period, since all the evidence has been collected and the matter otherwise also is of public importance, the Court below as well as the parties shall ensure that the trial is expedited and completed at the earliest, preferably within a period of one year. 10. At this juncture, as it has been pointed out by learned ASG that due to the prevailing circumstances, the trial may not be able to commence for the present, the Court would only observe that in the meantime, all pre-trial formalities be completed, so as to ensure that when the Courts resume normal functioning, the trial proceeds without any further delay.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

06-10-2020 C.J. Manoj & Others Versus Shriram Transport Finance Company Limited, Thrissur, Represented by Its P/A Holder, Vineeth Ramaraghavan High Court of Kerala
01-10-2020 P. Kandasamy & Others Versus Manikandan Finance Represented by Its Managing Partner A. Chellapathi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
29-09-2020 Laddu Lal Mahto Versus Managing Director, Tata Motors Limited, Bihar & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
21-09-2020 Tvl. Transtonnelstroy Afcons Joint Venture, Represented by its Authorised Signatory, Chennai Versus Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
18-09-2020 Sundaram Home Finance Limited Versus Rahul Jayvantrao Kaulavkar & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
09-09-2020 Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Others Versus Goverdhan Lal Soni & Another Supreme Court of India
08-09-2020 SREI Equipment Finance Limited Versus Rajeev Anand & Others Supreme Court of India
08-09-2020 Murari Lal Versus State of U.P & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
31-08-2020 Jayantkumar Kalubhai Sagar Versus Shriram Housing Finance Ltd. & Another High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
28-08-2020 Chhotey Lal Versus State of U.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
28-08-2020 M/s Urban Systems Versus The Union of India Rep. By The Secretary To The Govt of India, Min of Finance, Deptt of Revenue Central Board of Indirect Taxes And Customs, North Block, New Delhi & Others High Court of Gauhati
18-08-2020 Lal Chand Versus Union Territory of J&K & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
11-08-2020 Shankar Lal Yadav & Another Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Delhi
06-08-2020 Ram Lal Versus State of HP & Others High Court of Himachal Pradesh
28-07-2020 N. Madhavan Versus Union of India Rep. by its Secretary, Department of Financial Services, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
24-07-2020 Kapil Dev Chaturvedi Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Finance & Others High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
23-07-2020 Balwinder Singh Versus Mithoot Finance (P) Limited & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
17-07-2020 Pyare Lal Versus State of Haryana Supreme Court of India
14-07-2020 M/s. Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, Rep. by its Authorised representative Goregaon Mumbai Versus Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-07-2020 M/s. P.R. Mani Electronics Rep. by its Proprietor, Thiruvannamalai Versus Union of India Rep. by Secretary, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-07-2020 Sree Gokula Chit & Finance Co (Pvt.) Ltd Versus Sunil Sabu High Court of Kerala
30-06-2020 Sindhu. S. Lal Versus Revenue Divisional Officer, Adoor & Others High Court of Kerala
29-06-2020 Mohan Lal Jain Versus Insolvency & Bankruptcy Board of India & Another High Court of Delhi
26-06-2020 Amrut Lal @ Amrit Lal Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
23-06-2020 Tata Motors Finance Ltd., Mumbai Versus Vinod Kumar Agrrawal National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
23-06-2020 M/s. Acme Trade And Agencies, ASSAM Versus Union of India Rep. By The Secy. to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Finance, Deptt. of Revenue, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
23-06-2020 Munna Lal Versus State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Medical & Health Lko & Others High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
19-06-2020 M/s. Integrated Finance Company Limited rep. by its Legal Officer and duly constituted Attorney A. Hema Jothi Versus Garware Marine Industries Limited Registered Office at Chander Mukhi High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-06-2020 Vipin Kumar Choudhary Versus Makhan Lal Chaturvedi National University Of Journalism & Communication - Bhopal National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-06-2020 Jivan Lal Verma Versus Kishan Agrotek National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
10-06-2020 K. Premanandan Versus State of Kerala, Represented by The Under Secretary, Accounts, Department of Finance, Secretariat of Government of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram & Others High Court of Kerala
08-06-2020 K. Balasubramaniam & Others Versus Sri Vinayagar Finance, Namakkal High Court of Judicature at Madras
08-06-2020 A. Sudershan Versus M/s. Gowra Leasing & Finance High Court of for the State of Telangana
08-06-2020 K. Balasubramaniam & Others Versus Sri Vinayagar Finance, Namakkal (A registered Partnership firm by its Managing Partner N.K. Natarajan) High Court of Judicature at Madras
03-06-2020 Latelraj Suryawanshi (Latelram Suryawanshi wrongly mentioned in the impugned judgment) Versus Hori Lal Tamboli & Another High Court of Chhattisgarh
02-06-2020 Indian Overseas Bank Officers' Association, Reg No: 321/MDS, Rep by its Joint General Secretary, R. Muthukumar Versus Union of India, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-06-2020 Hitesh Bhardwaj Versus Ministry of Finance, Union of India & Another High Court of Delhi
01-06-2020 Vasu Versus M/s. Shriram City Union Finance Ltd., Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
30-05-2020 Kshitiz Sharma Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
27-05-2020 Jeetha Agnes Versus Union of India, Represented by The Secretary To Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi & Others High Court of Kerala
26-05-2020 M/s. Mulberry Silks Limited (formerly M/s. Shakashambana Silks Exports (P) Ltd.), 'Mulberry House', Rep.by its Director R.K. Bothra Versus Settlement Commission (IT & WT), Additional Bench, Ministry of Finance, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
21-05-2020 Aravapalli Krishna Murthy Versus Syed Lal Saheb Died & Others High Court of Andhra Pradesh
20-05-2020 Diwari Lal & Others Versus State of U.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
20-05-2020 The Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Ernakulam Versus M/s. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Kochi Refinery, Ambalamugal, Represented by The Chief Finance Manager High Court of Kerala
20-05-2020 A. Sennimalai Versus Tourism Finance Corporation of India Ltd., New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-05-2020 M/s. Seshasayee Paper and Boards Limited, Rep. by its Director (Finance) & Secretary, V. Pichai Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income- tax, Circle I (1) High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-05-2020 M/s. Seshasayee Paper & Boards Limited, Rep. by its Director (Finance) & Secretary, V. Pichai Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income- tax, Circle I (1) High Court of Judicature at Madras
14-05-2020 Meena Sharma Versus Nand Lal & Another High Court of Delhi
12-05-2020 Kenneth Jideofor Versus Union of India, Joint Secretary to Govt. of India Ministry of Finance & Revenue & Others High Court of Karnataka
11-05-2020 Shiv Lal (Since Deceased) Versus Mohan Lal High Court of Punjab and Haryana
08-05-2020 Mohan Lal Versus State of NCT of Delhi Supreme Court of India
02-05-2020 Ratan Ch. Banik Versus The State of Tripura, Represented by the Secretary to the Government of Tripura, Department of Finance, West Tripura & Others High Court of Tripura
30-04-2020 Jagdish Lal Versus State of Himachal Pradesh High Court of Himachal Pradesh
29-04-2020 M/s. PPS Enviro Power Private Limited (PPSE) Versus M/s. Pantime Finance Company Pvt. Ltd. High Court of for the State of Telangana
21-04-2020 State Bank of India, A Government of India Undertaking Rep by its DGM and Branch Head Stressed Asset Management Branch, Hyderabad Versus The Union of India, Ministry of Finance Rep by its Secretary Services Tax Wing, South Block, New Delhi & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
20-04-2020 Babu Lal Versus State (N.C.T. of Delhi) High Court of Delhi
03-04-2020 India Bulls Housing Finance Ltd. Versus Securities Exchange Board of India & Another High Court of Delhi
24-03-2020 Babu Lal & Others Versus Para Devi & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
20-03-2020 Nelco Limited Versus The Union of India through the Revenue Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
19-03-2020 M/s. Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. Versus Jaysingh Damodar Patil National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-03-2020 The Branch Manager, M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co. Ltd. & Others Versus Bikram Kumar Jaiswal West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
17-03-2020 Surajit Das Versus The Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Ltd. & Others West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
17-03-2020 Union of India, Represented by The Secretary To The Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi & Others Versus M.K. Ali Kunju, Tax Assistant, O/O The Director General Income Tax (Investigation), Elamkulam & Others High Court of Kerala
17-03-2020 R. Saroja Versus The Government of Tamilnadu, rep. by its Secretary, Finance Department & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
17-03-2020 Meghna Singh (Through: Her Natural Guardian) Avita D Lal Versus Central Board of Secondary Education & Another High Court of Delhi
17-03-2020 V. Raveendran Versus Sree Gokulam Chits & Finance Company Pvt. Ltd. Kodambakkom, Chennai & Another High Court of Kerala
17-03-2020 R. Saroja Versus The Government of Tamilnadu, rep. by its Secretary, Finance Department, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
17-03-2020 The Joint Labour Commissioner and Registering Officer & Another Versus Kesar Lal Supreme Court of India
16-03-2020 K.P. Sugandh Ltd. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh Versus State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Finance, Chhattisgarh & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
13-03-2020 Gyanendra Singh & Others Versus State Of U.P. Through Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Finance & Others High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
13-03-2020 Ramu Kalanjiam Venkataraman, Director, M/s. Lakshmi Petro Pvt Ltd., Chennai Versus M/s. Paceman Finance India Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Manager, Elumalai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
11-03-2020 M/s. Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director, R. Kirlosh Kumar Versus Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
11-03-2020 M/s. Jaya Sakthi Leathers (P) Ltd., a Company constituted under Companies Act, Rep. by its Managing Director, M.P. Adimoolam Versus The Finance Secretary, Chief Secretariat, Pondicherry & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
11-03-2020 Ram Dulari & Another Versus Ram Lal & Another High Court of Himachal Pradesh
09-03-2020 Citi-financial Retail Services India Ltd., Rep. by its Assistant Manager-Collections J. Srikumar Versus Dove Finance Ltd., Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
09-03-2020 The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Chennai & Another Versus Rane Brake Linings Limited, Rep. by its Vice President Finance & Secretary V. Krishnan & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
09-03-2020 S.K. Sampathkumar Versus Indo Asain Finance Ltd, Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-03-2020 Sudha Gupta V/S PNB Housing Finance Ltd. & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
06-03-2020 M/s. Connectwell Industries Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India Through Ministry of Finance & Others Supreme Court of India
05-03-2020 K.M. Suresh Babu Versus M/s. Sundaram Finance Limited, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-03-2020 The Director, Shriram Transport Finance Co., Chennai Versus Kulandhai Theres & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
04-03-2020 Shri Chand Construction & Apartments Private Limited & Another Versus Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd. High Court of Delhi
03-03-2020 Pachayammal (Died) & Others Versus M/s. Sundaram Finance Limited, Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
02-03-2020 Badri Prasad Mishra Versus Moti Singh High Court of Chhattisgarh
02-03-2020 V.M. Bijili & Another Versus Sundaram Finance Limited, Rep. by its Manager (Legal), Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
29-02-2020 Lal Chand Versus State of H.P. High Court of Himachal Pradesh
27-02-2020 Manohar Lal Versus State Of Himachal Pradesh High Court of Himachal Pradesh
27-02-2020 Aman Khattar Versus Jawahar Lal High Court of Delhi
27-02-2020 Abdul Rasheed Versus The Managing Director, Tata Motors Finance Ltd., Mumbai & Others Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
27-02-2020 Kumuthamalar Ramachandran Versus Joint Secretary (COFEPOSA), Government of India, Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue, Central Economic Intelligence Bureau, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
26-02-2020 M/s. Kiran Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. Through Director Manohar Lal Ahuja, Uttar Pradesh Versus Yashpal National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
24-02-2020 Tamil Nadu Retitred Revenue Officer's Association, Represented by its President A. Raju Versus The Secretary to Government, Finance Department, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
21-02-2020 Nagpur District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. & Another Versus Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
21-02-2020 K. Padmapriya Versus The Chief Finance Controller, Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation and Distributions Ltd., Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
21-02-2020 T.P. Akbar & Another Versus M/s. Sundaram Finance Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
21-02-2020 M/s. Sundaram Finance Ltd., by its Branch Manager, Ernakulam Versus T.P. Akbar & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
20-02-2020 ITC Limited, PSPD Unit: Rep. by its EVP Finance & MIS, C.V. Sarma, Coimbatore Versus The Joint Director, The Employees State Insurance Corporation, Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore High Court of Judicature at Madras
20-02-2020 Jayanta Dey & Others Versus The Union of India Through the Secretary to the Government of India, Revenue Department, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
19-02-2020 M/s. Behari Lal & sons V/S The State of Punjab High Court of Punjab and Haryana
19-02-2020 K.A. Beevikunju & Another Versus The Union of India, (Represented by Its Director General), Central Economic Intelligence Bureau, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi & Others High Court of Kerala