w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Max Zipper v/s State


Company & Directors' Information:- MAX INDIA LIMITED [Active] CIN = L85100PB2015PLC039155

Company & Directors' Information:- MAX INDIA LIMITED [Active] CIN = U85100PB2015PLC039155

Company & Directors' Information:- MAX CORPORATION LIMITED [Amalgamated] CIN = U24231PB1996PLC018766

Company & Directors' Information:- MAX INDIA LTD [Amalgamated] CIN = U24232PB1982PLC004841

Company & Directors' Information:- K G ZIPPER CO PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U51109WB1940PTC010356

Company & Directors' Information:- P G MAX PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U22219KL2012PTC031856

Company & Directors' Information:- ZIPPER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U01100MH1961PTC023004

Company & Directors' Information:- MAX I. LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999PB2016PLC045450

Company & Directors' Information:- K. P. ZIPPER PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51300DL2008PTC181960

    Criminal Revision No. 144 of 1991

    Decided On, 25 August 1995

    At, High Court of Delhi

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.K.MEHRA

    For the Petitioner: T.P. Gang Advocate. For the Respondents: Manmohan Singh Advocate.



Judgment Text

Crl. R. 144/91

1. This is an application for the return of the goods seized in a raid in prosecution initiated under Trade & Merchandise Marks Act.

2. I have heard the parties. In the present case on filing the complaint certain searches and seizures were carried out whereby certain alleged, spurious goods whereon false trade marks were being imposed by the accused petitioner were seized. The case is still before the trial court and even summons are yet to be issued. The goods which were seized have to be tendered in evidence to establish the alleged illegal activities of the accused, the petitioner in the present case. It cannot be said that these goods will not be required by the trial court at the time of evidence or are not to be used as evidence against the accused. As such there cannot be any question of any such application being enter

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

tained at this stage. 3. The petition is pre-mature and is, therefore, dismissed.
O R