w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



M.L. Kumawat & Another v/s Bharat Bio Tech International Ltd.


Company & Directors' Information:- K N INTERNATIONAL LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45201UP2002PLC026841

Company & Directors' Information:- V AND S INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U74899DL1992PTC049964

Company & Directors' Information:- S S A INTERNATIONAL LTD [Active] CIN = U15122DL1995PLC068186

Company & Directors' Information:- A T N INTERNATIONAL LIMITED [Active] CIN = L65993WB1983PLC080793

Company & Directors' Information:- K TECH PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U25190TN2012PTC084486

Company & Directors' Information:- D D INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909PB1995PTC016929

Company & Directors' Information:- T K INTERNATIONAL LIMITED [Active] CIN = U55101OR1982PLC001092

Company & Directors' Information:- N R INTERNATIONAL LIMITED [Active] CIN = L74999WB1991PLC051738

Company & Directors' Information:- K J INTERNATIONAL LIMITED [Active] CIN = L15142PB1993PLC011274

Company & Directors' Information:- A K S INTERNATIONAL LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1996PLC076327

Company & Directors' Information:- S P INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U70100WB1994PTC063228

Company & Directors' Information:- M TECH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U30007DL1997PTC087580

Company & Directors' Information:- B. K. INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999DL2006PTC157013

Company & Directors' Information:- R S C INTERNATIONAL LIMITED [Active] CIN = L17124RJ1993PLC007136

Company & Directors' Information:- J C INTERNATIONAL LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51109WB1999PLC089037

Company & Directors' Information:- M T L INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Amalgamated] CIN = U24219UP2001PTC025965

Company & Directors' Information:- T C N S INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Amalgamated] CIN = U51311DL1996PTC080096

Company & Directors' Information:- K V S INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2003PTC120770

Company & Directors' Information:- K. TECH (INDIA) LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24222MH2000PLC123695

Company & Directors' Information:- G N INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909DL2001PTC110766

Company & Directors' Information:- S H A M INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45200MH1994PTC079867

Company & Directors' Information:- M K INTERNATIONAL LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909DL1996PLC083430

Company & Directors' Information:- V. G. INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51101DL2007PTC162540

Company & Directors' Information:- D R INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24132DL1996PTC079867

Company & Directors' Information:- R H INTERNATIONAL LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72900DL2007PLC159452

Company & Directors' Information:- G & G INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17120DL2012PTC234047

Company & Directors' Information:- A & D INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U36109RJ2007PTC024176

Company & Directors' Information:- K A I INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U13100OR2007PTC009647

Company & Directors' Information:- C G INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U99999MH1996PTC097577

Company & Directors' Information:- K C INTERNATIONAL LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1994PLC060402

Company & Directors' Information:- M P INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29130MH1997PTC107943

Company & Directors' Information:- A S INTERNATIONAL LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74899DL1993PLC056158

Company & Directors' Information:- A K TECH LTD [Active] CIN = U74899DL1986PLC023700

Company & Directors' Information:- S. D. INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74900UP2008PTC036047

Company & Directors' Information:- S AND I INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909DL1995PTC072210

Company & Directors' Information:- L T INTERNATIONAL LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1999PLC097892

Company & Directors' Information:- A. INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51102GJ2008PTC053840

Company & Directors' Information:- S J M INTERNATIONAL LIMITED [Active] CIN = U52110DL1987PLC028571

Company & Directors' Information:- S B S INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL1997PTC085878

Company & Directors' Information:- I & V BIO INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U05000TN2014PTC098614

Company & Directors' Information:- R. A. INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51225DL2008PTC177405

Company & Directors' Information:- B G INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U50300PB2014PTC038889

Company & Directors' Information:- S F INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999PB2000PTC023654

Company & Directors' Information:- I K INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1995PTC066267

Company & Directors' Information:- C K INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1991PTC045625

Company & Directors' Information:- L A INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909PB2010PTC033683

Company & Directors' Information:- H R V INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Amalgamated] CIN = U74899UP1993PTC057665

Company & Directors' Information:- K P INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24110GJ2007PTC050026

Company & Directors' Information:- Z-TECH (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1994PTC062582

Company & Directors' Information:- V S INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U85100MH1997PTC109647

Company & Directors' Information:- N N INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U01111DL1999PTC099094

Company & Directors' Information:- S R V INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74140DL2012PTC243060

Company & Directors' Information:- A. R. INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51900MH2010PTC228539

Company & Directors' Information:- B R INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1993PTC055562

Company & Directors' Information:- M J INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Amalgamated] CIN = U74899DL1982PTC013231

Company & Directors' Information:- D N INTERNATIONAL LIMITED [Active] CIN = U36911TN1996PLC034205

Company & Directors' Information:- M. H. INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U70102DL2007PTC164267

Company & Directors' Information:- BHARAT INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1994PTC062143

Company & Directors' Information:- M G M INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U74899DL1982PTC013580

Company & Directors' Information:- J J INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51109DL1992PTC047657

Company & Directors' Information:- H D INTERNATIONAL LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1994PLC060720

Company & Directors' Information:- K. A. INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51101UP2012PTC049338

Company & Directors' Information:- J & G INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18109DL2012PTC238392

Company & Directors' Information:- K R INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17291DL2008PTC172188

Company & Directors' Information:- S P INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U99999UP1965PTC003091

Company & Directors' Information:- E-TECH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51101MH2013PTC240790

Company & Directors' Information:- B M INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1992PTC048736

Company & Directors' Information:- S G INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51109WB1998PTC086547

Company & Directors' Information:- B N INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15412WB1999PTC089316

Company & Directors' Information:- V A INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U01111DL2000PTC104712

Company & Directors' Information:- S. J. INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27310DL2007PTC169438

Company & Directors' Information:- G. S. C. INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29120MH1994PTC080380

Company & Directors' Information:- A J INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Converted to LLP] CIN = U74899DL1994PTC060818

Company & Directors' Information:- J S M INTERNATIONAL LIMITED [Active] CIN = U85110KA1996PLC020046

Company & Directors' Information:- N M INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74120MH2012PTC234492

Company & Directors' Information:- S S M INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909DL1997PTC089876

Company & Directors' Information:- A P J INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51909HR2010PTC040304

Company & Directors' Information:- T. INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72900DL1997PTC091049

Company & Directors' Information:- V R INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51101UP2011PTC043952

Company & Directors' Information:- M E C INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U33111GJ1963PTC082423

Company & Directors' Information:- TECH INDIA LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45201AS1995PLC004380

Company & Directors' Information:- J K INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U01100MH2004PTC144492

Company & Directors' Information:- D. S. R. INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999UP2010PTC039954

Company & Directors' Information:- R B INTERNATIONAL LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U18101WB1993PLC059515

Company & Directors' Information:- P Y INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Converted to LLP] CIN = U51102RJ1995PTC010133

Company & Directors' Information:- R C INTERNATIONAL LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51909TG1991PLC012477

Company & Directors' Information:- I AND A INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200TG1995PTC019936

Company & Directors' Information:- P V INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1998PTC094598

Company & Directors' Information:- I B INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U72200DL2000PTC105735

Company & Directors' Information:- A M INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74899DL1995PTC066228

Company & Directors' Information:- Z. H. INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U21098MH2010PTC210735

Company & Directors' Information:- J R INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909TN2002PTC048744

Company & Directors' Information:- L S INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74999DL2009PTC193390

Company & Directors' Information:- M B INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U52190DL2001PTC110572

Company & Directors' Information:- O K R INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74900DL1996PTC077152

Company & Directors' Information:- B B C INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U25209WB1984PTC037383

Company & Directors' Information:- K S INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51909MH2001PTC134345

Company & Directors' Information:- A TO Z INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51101TN1992PTC022507

Company & Directors' Information:- S I TECH (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U32109MH2003PTC140622

Company & Directors' Information:- C & A INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51900MH1982PTC026718

Company & Directors' Information:- J S INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U51900MH1982PTC027604

Company & Directors' Information:- A C INDIA INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1989PTC034784

Company & Directors' Information:- INDIA INTERNATIONAL COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51228MH1955PTC009483

Company & Directors' Information:- S C TECH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45400HR2015PTC055858

Company & Directors' Information:- R K INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U63040PB1982PTC004926

Company & Directors' Information:- R AND D TECH PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U33112PN2004PTC018927

Company & Directors' Information:- L & P INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U52100DL2016PTC292025

Company & Directors' Information:- K. V. TECH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Converted to LLP] CIN = U28939MH2008PTC181898

Company & Directors' Information:- D-TECH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72900DL2016PTC304389

Company & Directors' Information:- BIO 2 (INDIA) LIMITED [Active] CIN = U41000DL2012PLC243023

Company & Directors' Information:- R B N INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U52300DL2012PTC243998

Company & Directors' Information:- P AND P INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED. [Strike Off] CIN = U24100OR1993PTC003244

Company & Directors' Information:- E C INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U99999DL1982PTC013146

Company & Directors' Information:- R G V BIO TECH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED.. [Strike Off] CIN = U24232KA2008PTC046016

Company & Directors' Information:- V-TECH (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72100MH2000PTC127157

Company & Directors' Information:- M M INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD [Converted to LLP] CIN = U51312DL1977PTC008583

Company & Directors' Information:- BIO 2 (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U41000DL2012PTC243023

Company & Directors' Information:- A K INDIA INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U45201DL1981PTC012389

Company & Directors' Information:- C-TECH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72900DL1995PTC070765

Company & Directors' Information:- T B TECH PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U70100DL1986PTC023103

Company & Directors' Information:- O P INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U55101PB2013PTC037499

Company & Directors' Information:- J & A INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51900PB2013PTC037302

Company & Directors' Information:- Y. A. INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74900RJ2012PTC040431

Company & Directors' Information:- V TECH CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74900PN2012PTC145814

Company & Directors' Information:- D & A INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999MH2015PTC262713

Company & Directors' Information:- R. S. TECH PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45202MH2010PTC207142

Company & Directors' Information:- R L INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18204UP2016PTC076344

Company & Directors' Information:- V P S INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U93030UP2014PTC066242

Company & Directors' Information:- J V INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51102DL2012PTC240197

Company & Directors' Information:- S R L INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U20296AP2013PTC085533

Company & Directors' Information:- M D INTERNATIONAL LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74140MH1981PTC025007

Company & Directors' Information:- D C M INTERNATIONAL LTD. [Strike Off] CIN = U99999DL2000PTC004208

    Consumer Case No. 172 of 2003

    Decided On, 09 October 2019

    At, National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

    By, THE HONOURABLE DR. S.M. KANTIKAR
    By, PRESIDING MEMBER & THE HONOURABLE MR. DINESH SINGH
    By, MEMBER

    For the Complainant: Adarsh Kumar Tiwari, Advocate. For the Opposite Party: Anil Kumar Tandale, Advocate.



Judgment Text


Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Presiding Member.

1. The complainant No. 1, an IPS officer, was serving as Additional Director General of Police, CID, Hyderabad in the year 2003. The complainant No. 2 is the wife of complainant No. 1. The opposite party—M/s. Bharat Biotech International Limited (for short, ‘M/s Bharat Biotech’) is a pharmaceutical company engaged in manufacturing and marketing of different drugs, vaccines including the vaccine “Revac-B” for Hepatitis-B. Complaint:

2. For Hepatitis-B prophylaxis, complainant No. 1, Mr. M.L. Kumavat, took the first dose of Hepatitis-B vaccine ‘Energix-B’ manufactured by M/s. Smith Kline Beecham. He did not experience any adverse reaction. After about a month i.e. on 19.6.2001, he took second dose of vaccine with the trade name ‘Revac-B’ vaccine manufactured by M/s Bharat Biotech Ltd., the opposite party. The said vaccine was purchased from a regular medical shop and was administered by Dr. Indeever Reddy-doctor of the Police Department. The vaccine was administered at the complainant’s residence. Just after five minutes of administration of ‘Revac-B’ vaccine, complainant No. 1 started getting pain on right deltoid region which went on increasing and inflammation was started in that area. However, according to complainant No. 1, there was no such pain or reaction at the time of first dosage of ‘Energix-B’ vaccine. Furthermore, the swelling on the right deltoid region started increasing with discoloration of the skin on the entire deltoid region. The pain was intolerable and he started feeling breathless. The complainant No. 1 immediately rushed to nearby Vasavi Hospital, Khairatabad at 11.30 a.m. where Dr. Pushpa examined him and advised to apply analgesic cream on the deltoid region and to take ‘Avil’ and ‘Combiflam’ tablets. The complainant also called his departmental doctor, Dr. Reddy, who was shocked to see the condition of complainant No. 1. The complainant No. 1 had applied the analgesic cream and took the medicine also but the pain did not subside. He was unable to move his right arm or even the fingers of his right hand. Thereafter, he started feeling pain in the entire right side of the body. The reaction of the vaccine would develop a state of shock and paralysis in him. As advised by Dr. Reddy, complainant No. 1 approached Nizam Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad (NIMS) at 3.45 p.m. apprehending that this reaction might turn into fatal condition. He was examined at the emergency department of NIMS, and due to his extremely critical condition, he got admitted there. The doctors gave him life saving drugs and steroid. Thus, the complainant No. 1 had to battle for his life during his stay in NIMS from 19.6.2001 to 27.6.2001.

3. The complainant No. 1 further alleged that his father about 75 years of age was staying at their home town in Rajasthan, went into shock by knowing the serious condition of his son. His father could not recover from the shock and finally expired on 27.6.2001. Despite his ailing condition, he was forced to seek discharge from NIMS to attend last rites of his father.

4. Regarding vaccine ‘Revac-B’ it was bearing batch No. RVV 009 manufactured in 1998 and its expiry was November 2001. The complainant No. 1 enquired about the details of the company and came to know that the drug control had issued notice to the opposite party and it accused of not having printed the proper generic name of the said product in accordance to the prescribed manner. It was alleged that the vaccine was released before the approval of the Central Research Institute, Kasauli. The complainant also alleged that the drug department had received complaints that some people who used the vaccine ‘Revac-B’ of batch No. RVV 009 developed pain at the place of injection. The complainant No. 1 was shocked and surprised when he came to know that even after the drug department had issued directives to stop the sale of ‘Revac-B’ vaccine, opposite party disobeyed the directives and doing unethical sale in the market. The complainant further submitted that during his hospitalization, two senior officers of opposite party-company, namely, Mr. K. S. Rao, Director and Mr. G. M. Krishna, General Manager visited him with a bouquet of flowers and offered the complainant to pay hospitalization charges and other expenses. However, the complainant politely declined their offer. Thus, it was a mala fide intention of the opposite party to buy his silence by coming forward to pay the hospitalization charges/expenses. The opposite party had manufactured the said dangerous vaccine in violation of license from drug controller with utter disregard to the value and importance of human life. The complainant further submitted that due to the said episode his entire family suffered mentally as well as financially.

5. The complainant No. 1 further submitted that, on 6.7.2001 Dr. P.M. Bhargava, the President of Society for Scientific Values had written a letter to the then Drugs Controller General of India stating that the opposite party had been licensed to produce Hepatitis-B vaccine using only “ Cervisiac ” as the vector but have been using “ Pischia Pastoris ” as the vector. Thus, complainant No. 1 requested for investigation and withholding of license to manufacture their vaccine using “Pischia Pastoris” pending the Drug Controller General’s investigation.

6. On 19.7.2001, the complainant served legal notice to the opposite party for supply of sub-standard vaccine which did not meet the standard of purification. Being aggrieved by the entirety, the complainant filed a complaint for recovery of damages due to the negligence of opposite party-company, with the following prayer:

1. Issue an appropriate order and direction thereby directing the respondent to pay sum of Rs. 12 crore as compensation/damages/expenses as stated in para 26 of the complaint.

2. Issue an appropriate order and direction thereby directing the respondent to pay sum of Rs. 50,000 as cost and expenses of the present complaint.

3. Issue any other appropriate orders or directions as this Hon’ble Commission may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

DEFENCE

7. The opposite party filed its written version through its manager and denied entire allegations. According to the opposite party, complaint was based on wrong premise. There is no basis that the first dose of vaccine named ‘Engerix-B’ was uneventful, but after the second dose of vaccine with different trade name ‘Revac-B’, he got intolerable pain. He was hospitalized and took treatment for about one week for pain and inflammation caused due to administration of ‘Revac-B’ vaccine. The alleged grievance was untenable and the compensation of Rs. 12 crores prayed was highly exaggerated. The opposite party obeyed the direction/communication issued by Drugs Controller of Andhra Pradesh on 30.6.2001 calling upon the opposite party to withdraw batch No. 009 from the market. However, it was an administrative direction and not a conclusion about the quality of vaccine because the said batch No. 009 was already certified by the Central Drugs Laboratory, Kasauli on 22.3.1999, as being fit for human administration. One Dr. P.M. Bhargava addressed a letter dated 6.7.2001 to several persons alleging that the opposite party-company is using “ Pichia pastoris” as a vector without license from the owner of the Patent M/s. Research Technologies Corporation of USA. At the same time, complainant No. 1 got issued lawyer’s legal notice dated 19.7.2001 and 3.8.2001 claiming Rs. 12 crores as compensation by alleging “Pichia pastoris” is an inferior vector and demanded the stopping of manufacturing of the vaccine. After issuance of the lawyer’s notice dated 19.7.2001 and 3.8.2001, Mr. M. L. Kumawat and Dr. P. M. Bhargava had gone on a rampage by planting sponsored news in the Indian Express of Hyderabad Edition from 6 th to 9th August, 2001. Thus, the opposite party-company was victimized by the media trial. Dr. P. M. Bhargava had filed a writ petition No. 20565 of 2001 before the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad on 1.10.2001. The writ petition was dismissed vide order dated 21.11.2001 with their observation “inspecting team has pointed out certain deficiencies relating to documentation and maintenance” . There was no adverse remark about the quality of product and vector (Pichia-Pastoris) used in the production of vaccine. Thereafter, the sample of vaccine was sent to Central Drug Laboratory, Kasauli, who certified that the vaccine was safe and immunogenic responsive. According to the OP, the complainant No. 1 did not belong to high risk category of immunization of ‘Hepatitis-B’.

8. The opposite party further submitted that there was no prescription with the complainant No. 1 for ‘Hepatitis-B’ vaccination. The complainant No. 1 neither produced bill showing his name and details of purchase of Engerix-B (1st dose) and the Revac-B (2nd dose). The vaccine was administered by Dr. Indeevar Reddy, the doctor of police department which might have administered with lack of due care and caution. Another objection was that the complaint was barred by limitation as the alleged cause of action was from 19th to 26th June, 2001 when the alleged vaccination and hospitalization occurred, however, the complaint was filed on 7.8.2003. The complainant No. 1 had misused his official capacity and got enlisted the services of his subordinate officer Mr. Alok Srivastava, IPS (1977 batch), who was the Inspector General of Drugs Control Administration and got initiated proceedings by the Drugs Inspector against the chemist who sold ‘Revac-B’ vaccine of batch No. 009 on 19.06.2001 without prescription or bill. However, the investigation showed that the chemist had six vials of 0.5 ml each of Pediatric dose of batch No. 011. He did not possess any stock of batch No. 009.

ARGUMENTS

9. Learned Counsel of both the sides argued the matter. They reiterated their respective affidavits of evidence.

FINDINGS

10. We have perused the affidavits of evidence and the medical record of NIMS; gave our thoughtful consideration to the arguments from both the sides.

* According to the complainant No. 1, he suffered severe pain after injection of ‘Revac B’. There are several reasons which could be due to faulty administration or storage / refrigeration at the pharmacy. Therefore, how opposite party-company made liable.

* It is surprising that, how Dr. Indeveer Reddy suggest the complainant No. 1 to take ‘Revac B’ when already 1st dose of Engerix-B was given. Thus in our view it was fault of the doctor for choosing the different brand of 2 nd dose.

* We are not impressed about the contention raised by the complainant No. 1 with respect to the use of vector ‘Pichia Pastoris’ for manufacture of the vaccine. As per record the drug authorities have certified the product fit for human use and in the instant case, Central Drugs Laboratory certified the vaccine as being fit for human use and for release in the market on 23.2.1999. Moreover, M/s, Research Technologies Cor-poration of U.S.A. has not chosen to initiate any proceedings against the opposite party in India for its patent. Therefore,Dr. P. M. Bhargava has no locus to arrogate himself about what would be ethical in manufacture of vaccine by the opposite party.

* In the instant case, when the vaccine caused allegedproblem, the complainant should have preserved the product literature and the vial of the vaccine as an evidence before this commission.

11. We have perused the medical literature ‘Martinale: The Complete Drug Reference, a reference book published by Pharmaceutical Press consisting the adverse effects of vaccines. The extracts are reproduced below:

Adverse effects of vaccines

“Injection of a vaccine may be followed by the local reaction possibly if inflammation and lymphangitis and Induration or sterile abscess may develop at the site of injected vaccine. Fever, headache and malaise may start a few hours after injection and last for one or two days. Hyper sensitivity reaction may occur and anaphylaxis has been reported rarely.

In addition, Hapatitis-B vaccines have been reported to cause abdominal pain and gastro intestinal disturbance, and musculo-skeletal and joint pain inflammation. There may also be dizziness and sleep disturbance. Cardiovascular effects include occasional hypotension and rarely, tachy cardia. Other rare adverse effect dysuria, visual disturbance and earache.”

Adverse effects of Revac-B

Inflammation at the site of injection or a febrile reaction may be obsorved in some subjects. In rare cases of post vaccinal hyper sensitivity, the common symptoms that are quickly recognized by the physician are dizziness, headache, nausea, abdominal pain, rash, pruritis, urticria, arthralgia, myalgias, and similar associated symptoms and side effects.

Observations of NIMS hospital

There were no suggestive features of drug reaction or respiratory distress or bronchospasm or urticarial. The discharge report dated 27.6.2001 mentions the clinical diagnosis as post injectional soft tissue injury. The investigation with MRI of right arm showed oedema of deltoid muscle with subcutaneous tissue oedema.

CONCLUSION

12. The provisions of the Consumer Protection Act are in addition to and not in derogation of other laws in force. In our considered view, the vaccine manufactured by opposite party was not hazardous. Opposite Party complied with the World Health Organisation (WHO) standards and the manufacturing norms under Drugs and Cosmetic Act, 1940. The action under Section 32(2) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act is entirely different. However, in this case, the drug authorities have certified the product fit for human use and it was fit for release in the market on 23.2.1999. Even the Hon’ble High Court left the matter to decide by the statutory authorities.

13. The complainant No. 1 was hospitalized for 8 days from 19.6.2001 to 26.6.2001, it was not due to any grievous hurt or injury. We do not find any justification, why complainant No. 1 remained away from work for 21 days. It is also transpired that the complainant continued to be in the hospital and while being inpatient he went out of the hospital from 11.00 a.m. to 2.00 p.m. on 23.6.2001 and 24.6.2001 on his own volition, when he was allegedly under life threatening condition. He was discharged on 26.6.2001.

The NIMS medical record revealed that it was a case of local induration reaction due to inflammatory changes in the deltoid muscles. Medically in few persons induration or sterile abscess may develop at the site of injected vaccine. Fever, headache and malaise may start a few hours after injection and last for one or two days.

14. It is also transpired from the NIMS record that the duty doctor recorded that there were no suggestive features of drug reaction or respiratory distress or bronchospasm or urticarial rash.

15. We note the conduct of the complainant No. 1 in collusion with Dr. P. M. Bhargava and he made several allegations against the opposite party about the violation of manufacturing norms, the licence, about the illegal release of vaccine in the market without any authorisation by the department of drugs under Drugs and Cosmetics Act. We also note that the complainant No. 1 initiated action through Mr. Alok Srivastava, the Inspector General of Drugs Control Administration against the chemist who sold the said vaccine and against the opposite party-Co., however, nothing was proved. It seems that the complainant No. 1 has misused his official position by taking advantage of being senior to Mr. Alok Srivastava who belonged to 1997 Batch of IPS.

16. In our view, there is nothing on record to prove that the vaccine was either defective or of sub-standard quality. It was within the expiry date. It was administered by Dr. Indeveer Reddy, who was a doctor of their own police department. A person develops pain at the point of injection mainly due to injury and inflammation in the muscle tissue. Nothing is attributed to medical negligence. Thus complainant No. 1’s own statement about his life threatening condition is totally false.

17. The complainant No. 1 neither suffered any anaphylactic reaction nor had any signs of allergic reaction to the vaccine. Thus, in our view, the entire allegations and the complaint itself have multiple rings of untruth. It was just harassment by the complainant No. 1 in collusion with Dr. P. M. Bhargava, who was ex-staff of opposite party-Co. Both have indulged in publishing news in the newspaper from 6th to 9th August, 2001

18. Thus, in our considered view, the allegations are imaginary and the claim was irrational. Considering the entirety, the complainant No. 1 filed the instant complaint to harass the opposite party-co. by one way or the other. We do not find any merit in the complaint. The complaint is dismissed with cost of Rs. 10,000 to be deposited in the Consumer Legal Aid Account of this Commission within 8 weeks from today.

Registry shall report the compliance accordingly.

Mr. Dinesh Singh, Member:

19. It is noted that:

(a) A second dose of Hepatitis-B vaccine, ‘Revac-B (Recombinant)’, manufactured by opposite party Bharat Biotech International Ltd., was averred to have been taken by the complainant No. 1 on 19.6.2001. The said vaccine in the said second dose was different from the first dose of Hepatitis-B vaccine, ‘Engerix-B’, manufactured by one Smith Kline Beecham, averred to have been taken earlier. The averred batch No. of the Hepatitis-B vaccine, ‘Revac-B (Recombinant)’, in question was RVB 009. The report dated 22.3.1999 of Central Drugs Laboratory,

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

Central Research Institute, Kasauli, Himachal Pradesh, India, inter alia states that batch No. RVB 009 manufactured on 22.11.1998 with expiry date of 21.11.2001 was found to be of “Standard Quality” and “be released”. (b) No steps were taken by the complainants to get the vaccine in question analysed or tested through an appropriate laboratory as per the provisions of Section 13(1)(c) of the Act 1986. (c) No steps were taken by the complainants for class action under Section 12(1)(c) of the Act 1986. (d) On the face of it, the compensation claimed (Rs. 12 crore plus, in 2003) was not commensurate with the averred loss and injury due to ‘reaction’ to the vaccine in question, which, admittedly, did not cause any continuing or permanent bodily ill-effect to the complainant No. 1. (e) The complaint, ex facie, is frivolous and vexatious within the meaning of Section 26 of the Act 1986. 20. The complaint is dismissed with cost of Rs. 10,000 to be deposited by the complainant No. 1 with the Consumer Legal Aid Account of this Commission within eight weeks of the pronouncement of this Order. 21. It is, but, unequivocally and explicitly added that it is for the regulatory authorities, both of Government of India and of the State Government concerned, to regulate the import, manufacture, distribution and sale of vaccines. This Commission has no role therein. The dismissal of the complaint by this Commission shall in no way be construed to imply that the role and responsibility and accountability of the regulatory authorities or of the opposite party Bharat Biotech International Ltd. are in any manner affected or diluted. This inter alia includes any action that the regulatory authorities may have taken or may take in respect of the said batch No. RVB 009 or any other batch of the said vaccine in question or any other vaccine or drug manufactured by the one Bharat Biotech International Ltd. Complaint dismissed.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

22-09-2020 Elite International Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai Versus United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Chennai & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
27-08-2020 M/s. Web International Cargo Ltd., Rep. by its proprietor Srinivas P. Bhat Versus M/s. Magnum Logistics Ltd., Rep. by its Director, Jayaram High Court of Karnataka
26-08-2020 Huawei Technologies (UK) Co Ltd. & Another Versus Unwired Planet International Ltd. & Another United Kingdom Supreme Court
24-08-2020 The Director of Income-Tax International Taxation, Bangalore & Another Versus The Executive Engineer, M/s. Bangalore Water Supply & Sewerage Board, Bangalore & Another High Court of Karnataka
20-08-2020 M/s. Life Cell International Private Limited, Represented by its Company Secretary D. Mahesh, Chennai Versus Vinay Katrela High Court of Judicature at Madras
22-07-2020 Director of Income Tax-II (International Taxation) New Delhi & Another Versus M/s. Samsung Heavy Industries Co. Ltd. Supreme Court of India
17-07-2020 ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. Versus Delhi International Airport Ltd. Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission New Delhi
17-07-2020 Paras International Exports Versus Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Limited Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission New Delhi
16-07-2020 Hi-Tech Pipes Ltd. Versus National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. & Another SEBI Securities amp Exchange Board of India Securities Appellate Tribunal
29-06-2020 Coromandel International Ltd. (Earlier Known As Coromandel Fertillisers Ltd.) Through its Authorized Representative, Vishakhapatnam & Others Versus Kamrubai & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
26-06-2020 IRCON International Ltd. Versus M/s. Meumal Athwani High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
23-06-2020 M/s. Angelique International Limited Versus Public Electricity Corporation & Others High Court of Delhi
12-06-2020 Aberdeen Asia Pacific Including Japan Equity Fund Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-1(1)(1) & Another High Court of Judicature at Bombay
10-06-2020 Director of Income-Tax, International Taxation Versus M/s. Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd. High Court of Karnataka
10-06-2020 Hotel Nikhil Sai International Bar & Restaurant Versus Assistant Commissioner ST Audit & Another High Court of for the State of Telangana
09-06-2020 Ircon International Limited Versus Government of Andhra Pradesh rep by its Chief Engineer High Court of for the State of Telangana
08-06-2020 P.P. Jose, Manager, Mattoor, Kalady, Rice Tech Agro Mills Pvt. Ltd. Versus M.M. Abdulkhader, Proprietor, East India Trading Company, Kothamangalam & Another High Court of Kerala
05-06-2020 Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited Versus BDR Pharmaceuticals International Pvt. Ltd. & Another High Court of Delhi
01-06-2020 Sri Vinayaka Caterors & Consultants, Partnership Firm, Represented by its Partners, K. Eshwar Versus The Executive Warden, International Hostels, Anna University, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-05-2020 M/s. Shriram Capital Limited, A Limited Company represented by its Vice-President, N. Mani Versus The Director of Income Tax, (International Taxation) & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-05-2020 Bhansali Productions Pvt.Ltd. Versus Eros International Medial Ltd. & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
01-05-2020 M/s. Inter Ads Exhibition Pvt. Ltd. Versus Busworld International Cooperatieve Vennootschap Met Beperkte Anasprakelijkheid High Court of Delhi
01-05-2020 Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. Versus Space Tech Equipments & Structurals Private Limited High Court of Andhra Pradesh
30-04-2020 Banyan Tree Growth Capital L.L.C. Versus Axiom Cordages Limited (Previously Known as Axion Impex International Ltd.) & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
28-04-2020 Flemingo Travel Retail Limited, Having Registered Office at Turbhe, Navi Mumbai, Represented by Its Authorised Signatory Nixon Varghese Versus Kannur International Airport Limited, Mattannur, Represented by Its Managing Director & Another High Court of Kerala
23-04-2020 In Re: Scientific Disposal of Bio-Medical Waste arising out of COVID-19 treatment-Compliance of BMW Rules, 2016 National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
07-04-2020 Ultra Tech Nathdwara Cement Ltd. Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Rajasthan
18-03-2020 Union of India Versus Bharat Biotech International Ltd. & Others High Court of Delhi
13-03-2020 Dr. Rajesh Jhorawat Versus Life Cell International Pvt. Ltd., Kancheepuram & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
13-03-2020 M/s. Inno-Tech Electronics Systems, Rep. by it's Proprietor – M. Ravichandran Versus The Commercial Tax Officer, Mylapore Assessment Circle, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-03-2020 M/s. Shriram Capital Limited, A Limited Company represented by its Vice-President, N. Mani Versus The Director of Income Tax, (International Taxation) & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-03-2020 Paradigm Geophysical Pty Ltd. V/S Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-3, New Delhi High Court of Delhi
12-03-2020 Joshi Technologies International, Inc-India Projects Versus Union of India High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
11-03-2020 M/s. Meyer Apparel Ltd. Versus M/s. Panchanan International Pvt. Ltd. High Court of Delhi
06-03-2020 Uttam Datta Versus Proprietor, International Trading Co. & Another West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
03-03-2020 Cambridge International School & Another Versus Priyanka Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Chandigarh
28-02-2020 Seed Works International Pvt., Ltd. & Another Versus Banothu Rangamma & Others Telangana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hyderabad
27-02-2020 Perfect Synergy Advisory Pvt. Ltd. Versus Sagar Infra Rail International Limited & Others High Court of Delhi
24-02-2020 Saurabh Kar & Another Versus Kolkata West International City Pvt. Ltd. & Another West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
20-02-2020 Shree Rama Multi Tech Limited Versus Regional Director High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
17-02-2020 Steelbird HI-Tech India Ltd. Versus Asia Fibre Glass Products & Another High Court of Delhi
14-02-2020 APS Forex Services Private Limited Versus Shakti International Fashion Linkers & Others Supreme Court of India
14-02-2020 Seed Works International Pvt., Ltd., Rep. by its Finance Controller, TN Rajan & Another Versus Banothu Tharya & Another Telangana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hyderabad
11-02-2020 Ircon International Limited Versus C.R. Sons Builders & Development Pvt. Ltd. & Another High Court of Delhi
07-02-2020 Swastik Builders, Satyam Apartments Next to Rowell Continental (Sunny International) & Others Versus Dr. Shobha & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
06-02-2020 Soumitra Mukherjee Versus Green Tech IT City Pvt. Ltd. West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
05-02-2020 M/s. Texcel International Pvt. Ltd., Sengundram Industrial Area (Near Ford India Ltd.,), Chengalpattu Versus M/s. Chennai Steel Tubes, Rep.by one of its Partner, G. Bhavanishankar High Court of Judicature at Madras
31-01-2020 Alstom T&D India Ltd., Formerly known as Areva T&D India Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director, Rep. by its authorized signatory, Padappai Versus M/s. Texcel International Pvt., Ltd., Represented by Mukunthan C.O.O, Chengalpattu High Court of Judicature at Madras
30-01-2020 Bristol-Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland Unlimited Company & Others Versus BDR Pharmaceuticals International Pvt. Ltd. & Another High Court of Delhi
27-01-2020 Hotel Soorya International, Represented by its Partner, S. Arumugam Versus The Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition & Excise, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
22-01-2020 M/s. IRCON International Limited, (A Government of India Undertaking), Rep. by its Joint General Manager(South), Bangalore Versus The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Superintending Engineer(H), Villupuram High Court of Judicature at Madras
21-01-2020 M/s. Oasys Green Tech Private Limited, Represented by its authorised signatory E. Venkatakrishnaiah Versus Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward – 5(1), Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
21-01-2020 M/s. Oasys Green Tech Private Limited Versus Income Tax Officer, Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
15-01-2020 M/s. S.R. Bio Chem Versus Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
14-01-2020 Export Import Bank of India & Another Versus Punjab National Bank (International) Ltd. & Another High Court of Judicature at Bombay
14-01-2020 International Car and Motors Ltd. Versus Shyam Sundar Sen & Others West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
14-01-2020 Ircon International Limited Versus Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
13-01-2020 Delhi Vyapar Mahasangh, Delhi Versus Flipkart Internet Private Limited and its affiliated entities Buildings Alyssa, Begonia & Clover, Embassy Tech Village, Bengaluru & Others Competition Commission of India
13-01-2020 Union of India rep. By its Enforcement Officer Enforcement Directorate Chennai Versus M/s. Raiments & Garments International, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-01-2020 Congruent Info-tech Pvt. Ltd., Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai, Rep. by its Director, Shaileshkumar Limaye Versus The Regional Director, Southern Region, Ministry of Company Affairs, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
07-01-2020 West Fort Hi-Tech Hospital Limited Versus Punjab National Bank & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
06-01-2020 M/s. Prime Gold International Limited, Represented by its Director Achin Aggarwal & Another Versus The Additional Director General, The Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence Coimbatore Zonal Unit, Coimbatore & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-01-2020 Phoenix International Ltd V/S Commissioner of Central Excise, Noida-I Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal Regional Bench Allahabad
04-01-2020 HDFC Bank Limited V/S KPG International Private Limited and Others. Debts Recovery Tribunal Delhi
19-12-2019 J. John Winfred Versus International Airport Authority of India Rep. By Airport Director, Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
18-12-2019 M/s. G-Tech Stone Limited, Alwarpet & Another Versus BFIL Finance Limited, Mumbai, (formerly known was ITC Bhadrachalam Finance and Investment Limited, and since amalgamated with Russel Credit Limited) High Court of Judicature at Madras
16-12-2019 Abhey Kumar Sharma & Another Versus Ansal Hi-Tech Townships Ltd. Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission New Delhi
12-12-2019 Moets Catering Services Through Its Sole Proprietor Mr. Sandeep Bindra Versus Dr. Ambedkar International Center & Others High Court of Delhi
12-12-2019 M/s. Saravana International, Rep. by its Proprietor C.R. Devanathan, Panruti Versus The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Panruti High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-12-2019 Tuli International Through it is Partner, Neeraj Tuli Versus New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Through Sh. A.K. Longai, Manager, Duly Contituted Attorney & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
06-12-2019 M/s. N.V. International Versus State of Assam & Others Supreme Court of India
13-11-2019 Shaji B. John, Kings International Ltd., Quilon & Others Versus The Marine Products Exports Development Authority, Cochin, Represented by Its Secretary, Dr. G. Santhanakrishnan High Court of Kerala
07-11-2019 SPT International & Finance Ltd. Versus Bank of Baroda & Another High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
30-10-2019 M/s. Usha International Ltd., Represented by its Chief Operating Officer, Haryana Versus Customs & Central Excise Settlement Commission, Additional Bench, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
24-10-2019 Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Others Versus M/s. Sunbeam High Tech Developers Private Ltd. Supreme Court of India
22-10-2019 M/s. EOS GmbH-India Branch, Rep. By its Authorized Signatory, Prakasam Anand (Country Manager), Kolathur Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation 1(1), Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
17-10-2019 K.P.L. International Limited, Represented by it Senior Vice President, R.P. Mundra Versus The Commercial Tax Officer Saidapet Assessment Circle, Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
17-10-2019 Head Legal, Gmr Hyd International Airport Ltd. Versus Registrar, Airports Economic Regulatory Appellate Tribunal 2 High Court of for the State of Telangana
27-09-2019 Chennai Port Trust Versus Chennai International Terminals Pvt. Ltd. & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
26-09-2019 Ajit Ravi Versus Cochin International Airport Ltd. High Court of Kerala
20-09-2019 International Society for Krishna Consciousness Versus Ishwari Prasad Singh Roy & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
19-09-2019 Dharam Vir & Others Versus BGS International Public School & Others High Court of Delhi
18-09-2019 The Management of M/s. International Travel House Limited, Chennai Versus The Presiding Officer, First Additional Labour Court, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-09-2019 India SME Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd. Versus Medirad Tech India Ltd. National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
29-08-2019 M/s. Kadimi International Pvt. Ltd. Versus M/s. Emaar MGF Land Limited High Court of Delhi
27-08-2019 Yun Zhang & Others Versus Sealegs International Limited Court of Appeal of New Zealand
27-08-2019 Central Board of Secondary Education, Application Branch, Shiksha Kendra, Delhi, Represented by its Secretary Versus Manager, Bethlehem International, Vazhakulam, Ernakulam & Others High Court of Kerala
19-08-2019 International Flavours & Fragrances India Pvt. Ltd., Chennai & Another Versus State of Kerala, Represented by the Public Prosecutor, Office of the Advocate General, Ernakulam & Another High Court of Kerala
09-08-2019 Glencore International AG Versus Indian Potash Limited & Another High Court of Delhi
07-08-2019 San International Business School, Rep.by its Chairman, T. Jayalakshmi Versus The Director, Centre for Affiliation of Institutions, Anna University, Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
07-08-2019 K. Mahendran, Trincomalee Versus Deutche Welle Radio and TV International, Colombo Supreme Court of Sri Lanka
07-08-2019 Sphere International, a proprietorship concern through its proprietor Rakesh Jalan Versus Ecopack India Paper Cup Pvt. Ltd. High Court of Judicature at Bombay
30-07-2019 M Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. Versus State of NCT of Delhi & Others Supreme Court of India
30-07-2019 M/s. Kuldip Singh Sethi & Gagan Goyal Versus Ecole Globale International Girls School High Court of Uttarakhand
29-07-2019 Bently Nevada LLC Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1) (2), International Taxation & Another High Court of Delhi
23-07-2019 KAS International, Represented by its Proprietor, Chennai Versus The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Purasawalkam Assessment Circle, Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
12-07-2019 Cauvery Build Tech (P) Ltd. Kalamassery, Represented by Its Regional Manager & Power of Attorney holder Sivaji Versus Aneesh James, Proprietor, Immaculate Ceilings & Floorings, Kochin & Another High Court of Kerala
05-07-2019 M/s. Saravana International, Rep. by its Proprietor, C.R. Devanathan, Panruti Versus The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Panruti High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-07-2019 Guma Tech Marine Services Versus State of Maharashtra & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
03-07-2019 Union of India & Others Versus Ultra Tech Cement Limited & Another High Court of Judicature at Calcutta