w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Krishna Lal Yadav v/s Shambhu Kumar Yadav


Company & Directors' Information:- KRISHNA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1995PTC064252

Company & Directors' Information:- A. KUMAR AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U19201UP1995PTC018833

Company & Directors' Information:- S KUMAR & CO PVT LTD [Not available for efiling] CIN = U51909WB1946PTC014540

Company & Directors' Information:- S KUMAR AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Converted to LLP] CIN = U45203DL1964PTC117149

Company & Directors' Information:- KUMAR (INDIA) PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U51909WB1986PTC041038

Company & Directors' Information:- S KRISHNA AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U25209DL1989PTC124573

Company & Directors' Information:- S. KRISHNA & COMPANY PVT LTD. [Strike Off] CIN = U25191WB1989PTC046821

Company & Directors' Information:- C. LAL LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909HR2012PLC046499

Company & Directors' Information:- P KUMAR & CO PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27105WB1998PTC087242

Company & Directors' Information:- M KUMAR AND CO PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U18101DL1982PTC014823

    MA 205 Of 2000

    Decided On, 07 October 2005

    At, High Court of Bihar

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. VISA

    For the Appearing Parties: ----------



Judgment Text

M.L.VISA, J.

(1.) This appeal has been heard under Order XLI, Rule 11 of CPC alongwith IA No. 2533 of 2000 for its final disposal at that stage itself with the consent of parties.

(2.) The appellants have filed this appeal against order dated 13.03.2000 passed by learned Sub-Judge I, Supaul in Title Suit No. 4 of 1999 issuing temporary injunction restraining the defendants/appellants from causing any disturbance and interference in possession of plaintiffs-respondents over the suit land during the pendency of the suit. The plaintiff-respondent No. 1 has filed Title Suit No. 4 of 1999 in the Court of Sub Judge I, Supaul for partition for his share out of the land described in schedule II of plaint which comprises lands of new plots No. 2470, 2473, 2738 and 2324 measuring seven kathas seven dhurs. The case of plaintiff/respondent No. 1 is that he purchased the land described in schedule II from Bhallu Yadav who was a descendant of Pyarey Gope, the common ancestor of parties and after purchase, he is coming in possession of the land. His further case is that defendants-appellants purchased the lands of plots No. 2473 and 2324 having total area eight kathas five dhurs from defendants-appellants No. 4, 5 and 6 who are descendants of Bhaddi who was grandson of Pyarey Gope the common ancestor of parties and since then all the troubles and disputes arose between them and appellants. The plaintiff/respondent filed a petition under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of CPC, praying therein to restrain the defendants causing any interference and disturbance in his possession in the suit properties. He also filed another petition praying therein to order for maintaining status quo in respect of suit land. Defendants filed replies to aforesaid petitions and the Court below, after hearing both the parties, passed the impugned order temporarily restraining defendants/appellants from causing any disturbance and interference in possession of plaintiff over suit land during the pendency of the suit.

(3.) In this appeal, defendants-appellants filed IA No. 2533 of 2000 for staying the operation of impugned order. The case of defendants-appellants is that they, in reply to petition filed by plaintiff-respondent No. 1 for the issuing injunction, had specifically pleaded that they are having their houses, place for feeding cattle, one tubewell over the suit land. Their further case is that the plaintiff/respondent in his plaint has admitted that C S Khata No. 617 of mauza-Barhara was earlier recorded in the name of Ishwar Yadav and Dhorik Yadav but due to non-payment of rent, the lands of this khata were auctioned and were purchased by ex landlord who after purchase came in possession over the same and subsequently the land of this khata appertaining to C S plot No. 2933 having one bigha, three katha and fourteen dhurs, C S plot No. 2814 having eight katha, ten dhurs and C S plot No. 2847 having seven katha eight dhurs besides other plots having total area of five bigha twelve katha one dhur was settled in favour of Ishwar Yadav and Dhorik Yadav by ex landlord who put them in possession and, thereafter, the Jamabandi was created in the name of Ishwar Yadav and Dhorik Yadav for five bigha, twelve katha, one dhur of land and at the time of vesting of zamindari, return with respect to lands in question was filed in the name of Ishwar Yadav and Dhorik Yadav by ex landlord and plaintiff-respondent No. 1 has nowhere in his plaint mentioned anything about the settlement in favour of Bhallu Yadav, brother of Ishwar Yadav but still he claims that he purchased suit lands detailed in schedule II of the plaint from non else but from his own grandfather Bhallu Yadav. According to them, suit land was never settled with Bhallu Yadav alleged vendor of plaintiff-respondent No. 1.

(4.) Admittedly, plaintiff-respondent No. 1 has filed suit for partition and from the genealogical table given in the Memo of Appeal, it appears that parties are descendants of common ancestor Pyare Gope. From the impugned order, it appears that the Court below has held that appellants did not purchase any land of plots No. 2470 and 2738 as per their sale deeds therefore, they cannot have any claim of title and possession with respect to these lands and plaintiff being first purchaser in the year, 1992 that is five years before the purchase by defendants-appellants is having better title and claim over the land but at the same time, the court below has further observed that whether the plaintiffs or defendants are original purchasers from original owners is subject matter of final adjudication of the suit and which of the portion was purchased by whom is also the subject matter of final adjudication on the basis of their sale deeds. Again, it has observed that plaintiff is found to have a prima facie case for adjudication. All these observations appear to be contradictory to each other, especially in view of the fact that at the time of passing impugned order, defendants-appellants had not filed their written statement. As discussed above, the Court below has held that defendants-appellants did not purchase any land of plots No. 2470/2738. The case of defendants-appellants is that they purchased eight katha five dhurs of land of C S plots No. 2473 and 2324 and the plaintiff is also claiming the lands of these two plots and by adding lands of some other place has laid claim over seven katha seven dhurs of land whereas according to defendants-appellants, total area of C S plot No. 2473 and 2324 alone is eight kathas fi

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

ve dhurs. (5.) Considering the aforesaid facts, I find that contesting parties are descendants of a common ancestor and suit pending before the Court below is a partition suit. In this view of the matter, holding a co-sharer in exclusive possession of a part of suit land and, thereafter, restraining other co-sharers from causing any interference or disturbance of particular co-sharer in respect of part of suit land does not seem proper. (6.) In the result, this appeal is allowed and the impugned order dated 13.03.2000 passed in Title Suit No. 4 of 1999 by Sub Judge I, Supaul is hereby set aside.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

14-05-2020 Meena Sharma Versus Nand Lal & Another High Court of Delhi
13-05-2020 Anil Kumar @ Anil Versus State by Kodigehalli Police Station, Rep. by its Station House Officer High Court of Karnataka
13-05-2020 Swapan Kumar Saha Versus Bangiya Gramin Vikash Bank & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
13-05-2020 Mohomed Saleem Versus R. Senthil Kumar High Court of Judicature at Madras
11-05-2020 M. Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Versus State of Karnataka, Represented by the State Police Prosecutor, Bangalore High Court of Karnataka
09-05-2020 Gauri Shankar Versus Rakesh Kumar & Others High Court of Delhi
08-05-2020 Mohan Lal Versus State of NCT of Delhi Supreme Court of India
06-05-2020 Sunder Kumar & Others Versus State & Another High Court of Delhi
06-05-2020 The State (NCT of Delhi) Versus Sanjeev Kumar Chawla High Court of Delhi
01-05-2020 Jitender Kumar @ Rajan Versus Kamlesh High Court of Delhi
01-05-2020 Manish Kumar Mishra Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
30-04-2020 Romesh Kumar Bajaj Versus Delhi Development Authority High Court of Delhi
28-04-2020 Praveen Kumar @ Prashant Versus State of GNCT of Delhi & Others High Court of Delhi
28-04-2020 Praveen Kumar @ Prashant Versus State & Others High Court of Delhi
27-04-2020 Sunder Kumar & Others Versus State & Another High Court of Delhi
24-04-2020 Naresh Kumar Versus Director of Education & Another High Court of Delhi
21-04-2020 Mahadeo Construction Co. at Chhatarpur, Palamau Through its partner Anil Kumar Singh Versus The Union of India through the Commissioner, Central Goods & Services Tax, Ranchi & Others High Court of Jharkhand
21-04-2020 For the Appellants: Amit Saxena (Senior Advocate) assisted by Abhishek Srivastava, Advocates. For the Respondent: Ajit Kumar, Punit Khare, Advocates. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
20-04-2020 Babu Lal Versus State (N.C.T. of Delhi) High Court of Delhi
20-04-2020 Pradip Kumar Maji Versus Coal India Limited & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
20-04-2020 Aman Kumar Versus State of Bihar High Court of Judicature at Patna
20-04-2020 Aman Kumar Versus The State of Bihar High Court of Judicature at Patna
17-04-2020 Shankar Sakharam Kenjale (Died) Through His Legal Heirs Versus Narayan Krishna Gade & Another Supreme Court of India
09-04-2020 Manoj Kumar Versus The State of Bihar High Court of Judicature at Patna
09-04-2020 T. Ganesh Kumar Versus Union of India Represented by Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
08-04-2020 Ramjit Singh Kardam & Others Versus Sanjeev Kumar & Others Supreme Court of India
08-04-2020 India Awake for Transparency, Rep. by its Director, Rajender Kumar Versus The Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
03-04-2020 Gaurav Kumar Bansal Versus Union of India & Another High Court of Delhi
30-03-2020 Bala Krishna Mandapati Versus The State of Telangana, Rep., by its Chief Secretary, Revenue (Disaster Management-II), Hyderabad & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
20-03-2020 Suchitra Kumar Singha Roy Versus Arpita Singha Roy High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
20-03-2020 State Versus Krishan Kumar High Court of Delhi
20-03-2020 Pawan Kumar Gupta Versus State of NCT of Delhi Supreme Court of India
19-03-2020 Akshay Kumar Singh Versus Union of India & Others Supreme Court of India
19-03-2020 Pawan Kumar Gupta Versus State of N.C.T. of Delhi Supreme Court of India
19-03-2020 Pawan Kumar Gupta & Others Versus State High Court of Delhi
19-03-2020 R. Raghavan, Partner of Dinamalar Group, Dinamalar (RF) New Standard Press Annex, Trichy & Others Versus Educomp Solutions Ltd, Through its Senior Manager Nithish Kumar & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
18-03-2020 The Branch Manager, M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co. Ltd. & Others Versus Bikram Kumar Jaiswal West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
18-03-2020 Mukesh Hyundai Versus Ankur Kumar Roy National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-03-2020 Prabhat Krishna Verma @ Babloo Versus State of U.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
18-03-2020 Raj Kumar Versus Delhi Development Authority Vikas Sadan Near Ina Market New Delhi National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-03-2020 State of M.P. & Others Versus Rajendra Kumar Sharma High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwailor
18-03-2020 Amar Kumar Saraswat Versus M/s. Volkswagen Group Sales India Pvt. Ltd. & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-03-2020 Dr. Ajay Kumar Versus Indu Bala Mishra & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-03-2020 Praveen Kumar Versus M/s. RPS Infrastructure Limited, New Delhi National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
17-03-2020 The Joint Labour Commissioner and Registering Officer & Another Versus Kesar Lal Supreme Court of India
17-03-2020 Meghna Singh (Through: Her Natural Guardian) Avita D Lal Versus Central Board of Secondary Education & Another High Court of Delhi
17-03-2020 Subodh Kumar & Others Versus Commissioner of Police & Others Supreme Court of India
16-03-2020 Kuldeep Kumar & Others Versus Versus Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Through Chief Secretary, Delhi Secretariat, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
16-03-2020 Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., New Delhi & Another Versus Malay Kumar Majumder & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
16-03-2020 Munna Kumar Singh Versus State of NCT of Delhi High Court of Delhi
12-03-2020 Dalip Kumar & Others Versus State of Delhi High Court of Delhi
12-03-2020 Vijay Kumar Singh Versus Rana Cooperative Housing Society & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
12-03-2020 Nitin Kumar Jain Versus Union of India, Through, Human Resources Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
12-03-2020 Sunil Kumar Mishra Versus State High Court of Delhi
11-03-2020 M/s. Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director, R. Kirlosh Kumar Versus Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
09-03-2020 Kishore Kumar & Another Versus The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch - I, EDF-III, Greater Chennai Police, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-03-2020 Amar Kumar Paikra Versus State of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh
06-03-2020 Krishna Enterprise & Others Versus Axis Bank Limited & Another` High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
06-03-2020 Pankaj Kumar Singh Versus National Thermal Power Corp Ltd. & Others High Court of Madhya Pradesh
06-03-2020 South Eastern Coalfields Limited Versus Ashok Kumar Thakur High Court of Chhattisgarh
05-03-2020 Shantanu Kumar & Others Versus Union of India & Others Supreme Court of India
05-03-2020 Dilip Kumar Jatkar Versus Jayasree Jatkar High Court of for the State of Telangana
05-03-2020 Pardeep Kumar Versus State of Haryana High Court of Punjab and Haryana
05-03-2020 Gunjan Kumar Versus Management of Circle Head Punjab National Bank, Darbhanga & Others High Court of Judicature at Patna
04-03-2020 Pradip Kumar Chaudhuri Versus M/s. Dagcon (India) Pvt. Ltd. Through its Resolution Professional Bimal Agarwal & Another National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
04-03-2020 Uttam Kumar @ Tillu Versus State of MP High Court of Chhattisgarh
04-03-2020 Kiki Doma Bhutia Versus Bijendra Kumar Singh High Court of Sikkim
04-03-2020 Ashok Kumar Sharma Versus Nirmaldas Manikpuri High Court of Chhattisgarh
04-03-2020 The Divisional Manager, The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Tiruvannamalai Versus Suresh Kumar & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
03-03-2020 Ashok Kumar Gupta & Another Versus M/s. Sitalaxmi Sahuwala Medical Trust & Others Supreme Court of India
03-03-2020 Dr. Bussa Ramesh Kumar Versus The State of Telangana High Court of for the State of Telangana
03-03-2020 In The Matter of:D & I Taxcon Services Private Limited Versus Vinod Kumar Kothari, Liquidator of Nicco Corporation Limited National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
03-03-2020 M.K. Santhosh Kumar & Another Versus The Federal Bank Ltd., Represented by Chief Mnager & Others High Court of Karnataka
03-03-2020 Leon Thomas Kumar @ Layon Thomas Kumar Versus Mariam Sayanora Thomas High Court of Kerala
03-03-2020 Subir Kumar Sett Versus The Managing Director, Woods Laboratories Ltd. & Others West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
02-03-2020 M/s. Binjusaria Ispat Private Limited Versus Amit Kumar Agarwal High Court of for the State of Telangana
02-03-2020 V. Chakradhar Reddy & Others Versus G. Raveen Kumar & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
02-03-2020 Gateway Distriparks Limited & Another Versus Ranjiv Kumar Bhasin High Court of Judicature at Bombay
02-03-2020 Rasheed Ali Khan, Hyd Versus Jitender Kumar Guptha, Rep. By P.P. & Another High Court of for the State of Telangana
02-03-2020 Udbhav Kumar Jain Versus High Court of Delhi & Another High Court of Delhi
02-03-2020 Pawan Kumar Arya & Others Versus Ravi Kumar Arya & Others Supreme Court of India
02-03-2020 The Superintendent of Post Office, Bolangir Division, Bolangir, Odisha Versus Jambu Kumar Jain & Others Supreme Court of India
02-03-2020 Kiran Kumar Dhappuri & Others Versus The State of Telangana., Rep., PP & Another High Court of for the State of Telangana
02-03-2020 Pawan Kumar Gupta Versus The State of N.C.T. of Delhi Supreme Court of India
02-03-2020 Muthu Kumar Versus M. Thangarathi & Another Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
29-02-2020 Bhavan Kumar Versus State of H.P. High Court of Himachal Pradesh
29-02-2020 Praveen Kumar Khariwal Versus State of M.P. & Others High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Indore
28-02-2020 Ashok Kumar Gupta (Died) Versus Gauri Bagchi High Court of Chhattisgarh
28-02-2020 Ajit Pramod Kumar Jogi Versus State of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh
28-02-2020 State of Karnataka Versus Mahesh Kumar High Court of Karnataka
28-02-2020 Dilip Kumar Sharma Versus State of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh
28-02-2020 All India Drugs Control Officers Confederation, Rep. by its President, M. Dhilip Kumar Versus The Government of India, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-02-2020 Chaman Kumar Shah Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
27-02-2020 Principal and Superintendent of SSKM and IPGME & Another Versus Arun Kumar Pal West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
27-02-2020 Suman Versus Kailash Kumar High Court of Delhi
27-02-2020 A. Ajith Kumar Versus State of Kerala, Represented by The Secretary To Government, Forest & Wildlife Department, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram & Another High Court of Kerala
27-02-2020 Arun Kumar Gupta Versus State of Jharkhand & Another Supreme Court of India
27-02-2020 Kuldeep Gupta & Another Versus Mahender Kumar & Others High Court of Delhi
27-02-2020 Manohar Lal Versus State Of Himachal Pradesh High Court of Himachal Pradesh
26-02-2020 M/s. Kiran Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. Through Director Manohar Lal Ahuja, Uttar Pradesh Versus Yashpal National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC


LawyerServices is a Premium Legal Tech solution.


Lawyers, Law Firms, Government Departments and Corporates rely on us for, Workflow Automation, Data Aggregation, Timely Updates, Case Management, Intelligent Research, Latest Legal Data Updates and a LOT more!

If you are a legal professional, CONTACT US, in order to see how our UNIQUE solution can benefit your organization.

Features Intro Close Box