w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Khaja Nayeemuddin v/s State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Development & Others


Company & Directors' Information:- URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45400MH2011PTC300616

Company & Directors' Information:- URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45400WB2011PTC166069

Company & Directors' Information:- J J DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U50300WB1996PTC081491

Company & Directors' Information:- L N DEVELOPMENT LIMITED [Active] CIN = U70102ML1986PLC002590

Company & Directors' Information:- D P S DEVELOPMENT PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U45202WB1988PTC044797

Company & Directors' Information:- DEVELOPMENT CORPN PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U13209WB1939PTC009750

Company & Directors' Information:- R K URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45400MH2011PTC223591

Company & Directors' Information:- AMP URBAN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45400WB2011PTC164960

Company & Directors' Information:- A. B. URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U70100MH2015PTC267677

    Writ Petition No. 10128 of 2020

    Decided On, 11 August 2020

    At, High Court of for the State of Telangana

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM

    For the Petitioner: Zulfaquar Alam, Advocate. For the Respondents: R2 to R4, G. Chanakya, Advocate, N. Praveen Kumar, Learned Standing Counsel.



Judgment Text


Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; and Sri G. Chanakya, advocate representing Sri N. Praveen Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Municipality. As no adverse order is being passed against respondent No.5 in view of the nature of disposal being made, it is not necessary to issue notice to respondent No.5 at this stage.

Brief facts of the case as narrated in the writ affidavit are that the petitioner is resident of H.No.1-3-36/H, Rajendra Nagar, Mahabubnagar. Respondent No.5 through a sale deed vide Document No.6434/2020 dated 15.03.2020 purchased the property bearing No.1-3-36/C admeasuring 188.78 square yards situated at Rajendranagar, Mahabubnagar; that the property of respondent No.5 is a neighbouring property of the petitioner and there is a passage of approximately 5/200 feet on the Eastern side and 6/150 feet on the Northern side of respondent No.5; that these two common passages were in use by the people of the locality and public in general since more than 45 years; that after purchase of the property, respondent No.5 is raising a wall and pillar on the Eastern side of the property i.e., in common passage, and also blocked the Northern side passage by placing a cement sheet thus, in effect, he closed the access to the public in general; that noticing the illegal construction by respondent No.5 by obstructing common passage, the petitioner made a complaint on 26.05.2020, 01.06.2020 and 10.06.2020 to the respondent Municipal Commissioner with regard to the illegal construction of walls and pillars on public passage by respondent No.5; that similar representations were given to the District Collector on 26.05.2020 and 29.05.2020, and also to the Director, Municipal Administration at A.C. Guards, Hyderabad; that respondent No.5 had planted some trees after blocking the passage; that in the very sale deed through which the respondent No.5 had purchased the property along with the plan (sketch) to the sale deed disclose the Northern side and Eastern side of H.No.1-3-36/C being a common passage; that not only the petitioner but also one B. Tukaram, who is a resident of H.No.1-3-95/B, made a complaint to the Municipal authorities about the illegal construction being made by respondent No.5; that based on the complaints made, respondent No.4 visited the site and having taken note of the encroachment by respondent No.5, assured the locality people that he would get the illegally constructed walls removed and restore the public passage; that no action has been taken till date on account of the uncle of respondent No.5 who is a Head Constable in the 2-Town Police Station at Mahabubnagar which is the jurisdictional police station, taking advantage of his post, pressurising the petitioner to withdraw the complaint as otherwise the petitioner would be implicated in false cases; that the petitioner had also given a complaint to Additional Director General of Police, Law and Order, Telangana, on 16.03.2020.

In those circumstances, the petitioner prays for a writ of mandamus complaining inaction on the part of the respondent authorities against the illegal and unauthorised construction being made by respondent No.5 by blocking the public passage.

On the other hand, learned Standing Counsel submits that whether there is a common passage and, if so, whether it is being used by public at large; and whether such passage is forming part of public road vesting with the Municipal authorities (local body) are all questions of fact which are required to be established after investigation and after taking evidence into consideration in a properly framed suit; that the petitioner’s assertion that his right of way/right to passage is being obstructed is in essence a claim of violation of Easement rights which relief squarely falls within the four corners of the Easements Act, and therefore, making of complaint about inaction and seeking a mandamus against the municipal authorities to restore the alleged public passage is not a proper remedy, as the issues of this nature are best settled in the Civil Court in an appropriately framed Civil suit; that the municipal authorities are burdened with various functions under the Municipalities Act, rather than sorting out individual problems of neighbours’ encroachments into particular individuals property and making illegal constructions, preventing a passage by a person which is essentially a private street, and not a public street which is vested in the Municipality; that under the provisions of the Telangana Municipalities Act, 2019, the functions to be discharged by the Municipality are of essential and pressing nature, catering to the public amenities at large rather than sorting out individual grievances / disputes between the two parties; that as per the judgment of the A.P. High Court (before bifurcation of the State) reported in Kulli Srinivasa Rao v. The Vaodama Gram Panchayat, represented by its Sarpanch (2008 (4) ALT 187), the writ petition is not a proper remedy and the writ petition is not maintainable.

Having regard to respective submissions, in the present case on hand, the sum and substance of the complaint of the petitioner is that respondent No.5 has blocked the passage of about 5/200 feet on the Northern and Eastern side of his site and is making illegal construction, and the said passage is a “common passage” which is being used by the petitioner and others, thereby obstructing the movement of the petitioner and others.

In view of large number of cases of this nature being filed before this Court, more particularly, complaining about encroachment of passage/pathway, the access road, encroachment of individuals property by third parties and making illegal constructions, obstructions being caused for ingress and egress by neighbours by making unauthorised constructions, and the complaints not being acted upon by the municipal authorities, this Court has deemed it appropriate to consider:

(i) Whether there is a right in the individual citizen to demand the grievance of the nature to be redressed by the public authorities; more particularly, the revenue / municipal authorities / corporation authorities;

(ii) Whether there is any statutory duty cast on the authorities under the local laws/municipal laws to attend to such grievance and redress the problems of this nature, or whether the petitioners be directed to avail remedies in Civil laws.

(iii) Whether a writ of mandamus be issued in every case by the High Court to redress the problems of this nature or whether the petitioners are required to be relegated to the Civil Court for seeking appropriate remedies.

At the outset, it may be noted that though the petitioner asserts that the passage is being used by public at large, there is no assertion in the writ affidavit that the passage would fall within the definition of “Public Street” as defined under Sub-Section 70 of Section 2 of the Municipalities Act.

The Telangana Municipalities Act, 2019, defines “Public Street” under Sub-Section 70 of Section 2 of the Act, and also defines “Private Street” in Sub-Section 68 of Section 2 of the Act, which are defined as under:

Public Street means any street, road, square, court, alley, passage or riding path over which the public have a right of way whether a thoroughfare or not, and includes –

(i) the roadway over any public bridge or causeway;

(ii) the footway attached to any such street, public bridge or causeway;

(iii) the drains attached to any such street, public bridge or causeway and the land, whether covered or not by any pavement, veranda, or other structure which lies on either side of the roadway upto the boundaries of the adjacent property whether that property is private property or property belonging to the Government.

Private Street means any street, road, square, court, alley, passage, or riding path, which is not a public street but does not include a pathway made by the owner of premises on his own land to secure access to, or the convenient use of, such premises.

Sections 137 to 143 of the Telangana Municipalities Act deal with public streets. While Sections 137 and 139 enumerate the prohibited activities, Section 138, 141, 142 and 143 delineate the functions to be discharged by the Municipal Commissioner in relation to the public streets.

Under Section 294 of the Act, public streets and appurtenances in the Municipality shall vest with the Municipality. With a power to withdraw such of the streets etc., from the control of the Municipality and place the same under the control in other department of Government by special notification. The withdrawn public streets shall be governed by the provisions of Section 295 of the Act.

While Section 185 of the Municipalities Act dealing with “Removal of Encroachments on Streets”, couched in general terms, though does not use the words ‘public streets’, the same has to be necessarily understood in the context of public streets vesting in the Municipality, and the scope of Section 185 by necessary implication gets restricted to public streets as defined under Sub-Section 70 of Section 2, and excludes private streets defined under Sub-Section 68 of Section 2 of the Act.

In the present case on hand, though the contention of the petitioner is that the 5th respondent has encroached upon and occupied the passage of 5/200 size as stated supra, neither there is an averment in the writ petition that the said passage is a “Public Street” as defined under the Act, nor there is any material placed before this Court to the effect that the said passage is a “Public Street” mandating the municipal authorities to take action in terms of Section 185 of the Act. The only

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

piece of material placed by the petitioner before this Court is the Sale Deed through which respondent No.5 came to acquire the property and the plan (sketch) attached to the Sale Deed. A conjoint reading of various provisions in the Telangana Municipalities Act, 2019, makes it clear that the responsibility of the authorities under the Telangana Municipalities Act, 2019, with respect to removal of encroachments/obstructions is restricted to “Public Streets”, thus essentially leaving it open for the respective parties/individuals to agitate their grievance with respect to “Private Streets” as a Civil dispute before the appropriate Civil Court either under Easements Act or Specific Reliefs Act. In the present case on hand, this Court at the stage of admission on 10.07.2020 directed the respondent authorities to take necessary action in accordance with law. In those circumstances, no further orders are needed in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

01-10-2020 Construction Industry Development Council, New Delhi Versus Arjun Singh & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-09-2020 K. Murugan: Petitioner in W.P (MD). No. 2547/15 T. Velladurai, Petitioner in W.P (MD). No. 2548/15, Versus The Block Development Officer, (Village Panchayat), Panchayat Union Office, Alangulam & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
09-09-2020 Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, through Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Nagpur Versus Laxman Seetaram Neulkar & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
07-09-2020 Suneeta Sharma Versus Greater Mohali Area Development Authority, Punjab & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
02-09-2020 G.C. Kishor Kumar Versus Karnataka State Handicrafts Development Corporation Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, Bengaluru & Others High Court of Karnataka
01-09-2020 M/s Elgi Equipments Ltd., Rep.by its company Secretary, S. Raveendar, Coimbatore Versus M/s Kurichi New Town Development Authority Rep.by its Member Secretary, Kurichi, Coimbatore & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
28-08-2020 M/s Urban Systems Versus The Union of India Rep. By The Secretary To The Govt of India, Min of Finance, Deptt of Revenue Central Board of Indirect Taxes And Customs, North Block, New Delhi & Others High Court of Gauhati
28-08-2020 State of Madhya Pradesh Versus Centre for Environment Protection Research & Development & Others Supreme Court of India
25-08-2020 The Deputy General Manager, Small Industries Development Bank of India, Coimbatore & Another Versus M/s. Annamalai Hotels (Pvt.) Ltd., Rep.by its Managing Director, P. Velusamy, Coimbatore High Court of Judicature at Madras
25-08-2020 Gopal Krishna Mishra Versus State of Chhattisgarh through The Secretary, Department of Tribal Welfare Development, Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
17-08-2020 National Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd., Uttar Pardesh & Another Versus M/s. Khandelwal Rubber Products Pvt. Ltd., Uttar Pradesh & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
13-08-2020 Karakapally Pusparaju Versus The State of Telangana, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj & Rural Development Department & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
10-08-2020 Maranalloor Milk Producers Co. Operative Society Ltd. Represented by Its Secretary, Thiruvananthapuram & Others Versus The Registrar /Director, Directorate of Dairy Development, Pattom & Others High Court of Kerala
06-08-2020 Syed Firdouse Begum Versus State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj & Rural Development Department & Others High Court of Andhra Pradesh
05-08-2020 Sudhindra Das Versus Assam Fisheries Development Corporation Ltd & Others High Court of Gauhati
05-08-2020 K. Ramalingamma Versus State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayat Raj & Rural Development, Velagapudi, Amaravathi & Others High Court of Andhra Pradesh
04-08-2020 Santosh Kumar Garg (Deceased) Versus U.P. Housing & Development Board, U.P. & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
04-08-2020 S. Ganesan Versus The Commissioner, Department of Rural Development & Panchayat Raj, Chennai & Another Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
03-08-2020 Sadanand Versus The State of Karnataka, Rep. by its Secretary Urban Development Department, Bengaluru & Another High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench OF Kalaburagi
31-07-2020 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority, Punjab & Another Versus Deepshikha National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
30-07-2020 Haryana Urban Development Authority, Haryana & Another Versus Jaswant Singh National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
24-07-2020 P. Prabhavathi Versus The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Authority, Secretariat, Hyderabad & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
24-07-2020 Vishnu Priya & Others Versus State of Kerala, Represented by Secretary To Government, SC/ST Development Department, Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram & Others High Court of Kerala
21-07-2020 Vardhaman Mahila Co-op. Urban Bank Limited Versus A. Vijaya Kumari & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
20-07-2020 Manohar Bandopanth Belekar Versus Dr. Annasaheb Chougule Vadgaon Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd. & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
16-07-2020 Satendra Nath Biswas Versus State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Urban, Administration, Chhattisgarh & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
15-07-2020 Vankudoth Swathi Versus The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Development, Secretariat & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
14-07-2020 The Director General (Road Development) National Highways Authority of India Versus Aam Aadmi Lokmanch & Others Supreme Court of India
13-07-2020 Rakesh Wadhwan, Shareholder (Housing Development & Infrastructure Ltd.) Versus Bank of India, Bandra, & Another National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
09-07-2020 Khem Raj Verma & Others Versus Union of India, through Ministry of Human Resource & Development, Department of Higher Education, New Delhi & Another Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh Bench
07-07-2020 Dr. Y. Kedareswari Versus The State of Telangana, rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Social Welfare (SC Development) Department, Secretariat & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
07-07-2020 The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board, Bengaluru & Another Versus Byamma & Others High Court of Karnataka
07-07-2020 Kamla Nehru Educational Society Thru Secy. Shri Sunil Dev & Others Versus State of U.P. Thru Secretary Housing & Urban Planning & Others High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
03-07-2020 M/s. Psa Impex Pvt Ltd Versus Graeater Noida Industrial Development & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
30-06-2020 Bengal Shirsti Infrastructure Development Ltd. & Others Versus Saurajit Banerjee & Another West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
24-06-2020 Barak Valley Hills Tribes Development Council, Assam Versus State of Assam & Others High Court of Gauhati
23-06-2020 Swetha Shri Selvakumar Versus Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
23-06-2020 P.S. Srinivas Rao Versus 60th Padubidri Grama Panchayath, Represented by its Panchayath Development Officer & Others High Court of Karnataka
18-06-2020 N. Krishnamoorthy Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Rural Development & Panchayat Raj Department, Chennai & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
17-06-2020 Ashish Aggarwal Versus Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Limited, New Delhi National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
17-06-2020 Santhosh Thazhathu Versus The Chief Executive Officer, Bangalore Urban Dist. Panchayati, Bangalore & Others High Court of Karnataka
12-06-2020 Dr. D. Euvalingam & Others Versus The Secretary to Government, Ministry of Human Resource Development, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
12-06-2020 Awadhesh Kumar Versus Multi State Co-operative Land Development Bank, Patna & Others High Court of Judicature at Patna
02-06-2020 C. Sasiyendran Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, rep., by its Secretary to Government, Housing & Urban Development Department, Chennai & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
01-06-2020 Padmavani Educational & Charitable Trust, Rep.by its Joint Managing Trustee, Salem Versus The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep.its Secretary, Housing & Urban Development Department, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-06-2020 K. Shanthi Versus The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Secretary, Housing and Urban Development Department, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-06-2020 M/s SGS Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Versus State of Bihar Urban Development Agency BUDA, Patna & Another High Court of Judicature at Patna
01-06-2020 Nagen Chandra Das & Others Versus The State of Assam, Rep. by the Comm. And Secy., Deptt. of Urban Development Deptt., Dispur & Others High Court of Gauhati
29-05-2020 N. Vijayakumary Versus The Kerala Land Development Corporation Limited, Registered Office Thrissur, Represented By Its Managing Director & Another High Court of Kerala
21-05-2020 Binay Kumar Mishra Versus The Director (R.P. Cell), Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board & Others High Court of Delhi
19-05-2020 The Konkan Irrigation Development Corporation, Water Resources Department, Sinchan Bhavan, Kopri Colony, Thane (West) & Others Versus M/s. F.A. Enterprises & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
15-05-2020 The State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Agriculture, Animal Hubandary, Dairy Development & Fisheries Department, Mantralaya & Another Versus Madhukar Suryabhan Ingale In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
08-05-2020 V. Srinivas Chowdary & Others Versus State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Department of Panchayat Raj & Rural Development, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati & Others High Court of Andhra Pradesh
08-05-2020 Gaddam Koteswaramma Versus State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department, Secretariat & Others High Court of Andhra Pradesh
08-05-2020 Ravipati Nagasarala & Others Versus State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Panchayat Raj & Rural Development, Secretariat, Amaravati & Others High Court of Andhra Pradesh
05-05-2020 Prabhu & Others Versus The State of Karnataka, by its Secretary Department of Housing & Urban Development, Bangalore & Others High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench At Dharwad
05-05-2020 V. Divakar Versus The State of Karnataka, Department of Urban Development, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Bengaluru & Others High Court of Karnataka
30-04-2020 Romesh Kumar Bajaj Versus Delhi Development Authority High Court of Delhi
30-04-2020 Delhi Development Authority & Others Versus Pushpa Lata & Others High Court of Delhi
27-04-2020 Aishwarya Atul Pusalkar Versus Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority & Others Supreme Court of India
27-04-2020 P. Damodhar Versus The Telangana State Industrial Development Corporation Limited rep by its Joint Managing Director, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
17-04-2020 South Durban Community Environmental Alliance Versus MEC For Economic Development, Tourism And Environmental Affairs Kwazulu-Natal Provincial Government & Another Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa
08-04-2020 Civilian Welfare & Development Trust (Regd.) Versus Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Others High Court of Delhi
04-04-2020 ABC Versus Union of India, Represented by Secretary, Ministry of Women & Child Development, New Delhi & Others High Court of Kerala
20-03-2020 Prem Devi Versus Delhi Development Authority Through Its Vice Chairman Vikas Sadan, New Delhi National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-03-2020 Raj Kumar Versus Delhi Development Authority Vikas Sadan Near Ina Market New Delhi National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-03-2020 Ritesh Rajendra Thakur Versus State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary, Tribal Development Department & Another High Court of Judicature at Bombay
18-03-2020 West Bengal Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd. & Others Versus M/s. Sona Promoters Pvt. Ltd. & Others Supreme Court of India
17-03-2020 Chetan Prabhakar Rajwade Versus The State of Maharashtra, Through Secretary, Tribal Development Department & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
17-03-2020 Bengaluru Development Authority V/S Sudhakar Hegde & Others Supreme Court of India
17-03-2020 M/s. Rite Choice Foundations and Engineering Pvt. Ltd., Rep., by its Managing Director, C.K. Sridhar Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep., by its Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-03-2020 Ram Pralhad Khatri & Others Versus State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
13-03-2020 Nagrik Samanvya Samiti & Others Versus The State of Maharashtra, Through Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
12-03-2020 Nitin Kumar Jain Versus Union of India, Through, Human Resources Development, Department of School Education & Literacy, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
11-03-2020 Jerome Velho Versus State of Goa, through the Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
11-03-2020 S.S. Sundaresan Versus State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department, Chennai & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
10-03-2020 V.S. Senthil Kumar Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Secretary, Housing and Urban Development, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
09-03-2020 Milind Bhimsing Shirsath Versus The State of Maharashtra Through its Tribal Development Department, Mantralaya & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
06-03-2020 Choda Bhutia & Others Versus State of Sikkim, Through the Secretary, Human Resources & Development Department Government of Sikkim & Others High Court of Sikkim
06-03-2020 Indore Development Authority Versus Manoharlal & Others Supreme Court of India
06-03-2020 V. Gurusamy Versus The Secretary to Government, Rural Development & Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Chennai & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
06-03-2020 Om Prakash Swami Versus Haryana State Industrial And Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd., New Delhi National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
06-03-2020 Bengal Shelter Housing Development Ltd. Versus Champa Adak & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
04-03-2020 Ravindra Manik Shinde & Another Versus State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mantralaya & Another High Court of Judicature at Bombay
04-03-2020 R. Praveen Versus The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-03-2020 Madhya Pradesh Housing & Infrastructure Development Board & Another Versus Vijay Bodana & Others Supreme Court of India
03-03-2020 Abdul Salam & Others Versus Delhi Development Authority & Another High Court of Delhi
03-03-2020 State of West Bengal Versus PAM Development Private Limited High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
02-03-2020 Birru Prathap Reddy & Others Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayat Raj & Rural Development, Secretariat & Others High Court of Andhra Pradesh
29-02-2020 N.V. Siva Rama Prasad Versus State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by the Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj & Rural Development Department & Others High Court of Andhra Pradesh
27-02-2020 Mann Housing Development & Others V/S Paarijat Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. High Court of Judicature at Bombay
26-02-2020 Burdwan Development Authority & Others Versus Arifa Khatun & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
26-02-2020 Anil Dattatraya Girme & Others Versus The State of Maharashtra Through the Ministry of Urban Development, Mantralaya & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
26-02-2020 M.P. Road Development Corporation Versus Jagannath & Others High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Indore
26-02-2020 The Administrator, City and Industrial Development Corporation [CIDCO] & Others Versus Padmakar & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
25-02-2020 R. Thenmozhi Versus The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Housing & Urban Development, Secretariat, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
24-02-2020 Vuchi Bhuvaneswari Prasad Versus State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Municipal Administration & Urban Development & Others High Court of Andhra Pradesh
20-02-2020 Ummer Nechikkadan Versus Nilambur Co-Operative Urban Bank Ltd., Represented by Its Managing Director, Malappuram & Others High Court of Kerala
19-02-2020 Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd., R/by the Deputy Manager (Legal), Ernakulam Branch Versus R. Ranjith Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
19-02-2020 Rajendra K. Bhutta Versus Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority & Another Supreme Court of India