w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Kerala Textile and Garments Dealer Welfare Association and Another v/s The State of Kerale


Company & Directors' Information:- KERALA STATE TEXTILE CORPORATION LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101KL1972SGC002405

Company & Directors' Information:- D R GARMENTS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101GJ2005PTC046010

Company & Directors' Information:- R. R. GARMENTS LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51900MH1995PLC095544

Company & Directors' Information:- S G GARMENTS LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101WB2004PLC098193

Company & Directors' Information:- K K P GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65921TZ1994PTC005334

Company & Directors' Information:- B K GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2001PTC109850

Company & Directors' Information:- KERALA GARMENTS LTD [Active] CIN = U18101KL1974SGC002619

Company & Directors' Information:- N K GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2000PTC107093

Company & Directors' Information:- K. D. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18109WB2005PTC101896

Company & Directors' Information:- G AND A GARMENTS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U18101PB1995PTC016121

Company & Directors' Information:- V H GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U52322MH2008PTC181066

Company & Directors' Information:- K S DEALER PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909WB2009PTC134541

Company & Directors' Information:- S. S. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL1996PTC083315

Company & Directors' Information:- G. M. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18109DL2006PTC152683

Company & Directors' Information:- D AND D GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1975PTC007923

Company & Directors' Information:- J S GARMENTS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74900WB2009PTC135262

Company & Directors' Information:- K. B . GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18109WB2011PTC166954

Company & Directors' Information:- A K GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17120DL2015PTC282847

Company & Directors' Information:- D P GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U18101DL2004PTC129479

Company & Directors' Information:- V S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC143084

Company & Directors' Information:- P AND P GARMENTS PVT LTD [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC143556

Company & Directors' Information:- V S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101HR2005PTC068124

Company & Directors' Information:- L. H. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U17121KA2011PTC060761

Company & Directors' Information:- K R GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U17111WB1998PTC087046

Company & Directors' Information:- T & A GARMENTS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U52321TN1993PTC025318

Company & Directors' Information:- P. S. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18204DL2007PTC164238

Company & Directors' Information:- S. A. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17121DL2007PTC165007

Company & Directors' Information:- T S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51494DL1996PTC076668

Company & Directors' Information:- GARMENTS INDIA PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U51909GJ1979PTC003310

Company & Directors' Information:- N. K. DEALER PVT. LTD. [Strike Off] CIN = U51109WB1994PTC064119

Company & Directors' Information:- I G S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U18101DL2004PTC128723

Company & Directors' Information:- M. P. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17291DL2007PTC164129

Company & Directors' Information:- K. S. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2007PTC164404

Company & Directors' Information:- B G GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL2005PTC142488

Company & Directors' Information:- G M DEALER PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909WB2011PTC163629

Company & Directors' Information:- S P GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U18101DL2003PTC120709

Company & Directors' Information:- P N GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51311DL2004PTC127524

Company & Directors' Information:- V P GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U18109DL2012PTC233293

Company & Directors' Information:- S T GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18109DL2015PTC277043

Company & Directors' Information:- P L GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17120DL2013PTC248417

Company & Directors' Information:- M. K. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17291DL2007PTC164395

Company & Directors' Information:- R A GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Converted to LLP and Dissolved] CIN = U18101DL2003PTC123385

Company & Directors' Information:- C S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC134787

Company & Directors' Information:- B L GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC136912

Company & Directors' Information:- B D S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC137898

Company & Directors' Information:- T G GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC143392

Company & Directors' Information:- G P S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED. [Active] CIN = U18101DL2006PTC149330

Company & Directors' Information:- G P GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2007PTC161067

Company & Directors' Information:- I B GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909DL2013PTC257044

Company & Directors' Information:- G P S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED. [Active] CIN = U74110DL2006PTC149330

Company & Directors' Information:- A G GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51300DL2013PTC257609

Company & Directors' Information:- V R V GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51311DL2008PTC182256

Company & Directors' Information:- M V GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74899HR2005PTC141797

Company & Directors' Information:- A AND R GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U17120HR2013PTC049037

Company & Directors' Information:- V K GARMENTS PRIVATE LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U18101DL1981PTC012410

Company & Directors' Information:- A S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17212CH1992PTC012350

Company & Directors' Information:- V R GARMENTS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U18101CH1991PTC011345

Company & Directors' Information:- S B GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51311DL2005PTC141954

    W.P.(C) No.33568 of 2005, 36386 of 2005, 90, 332, 4824, 5152, 6676, 8638, 8818 of 2006

    Decided On, 26 October 2006

    At, High Court of Kerala

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR

    For the Appearing Parties: A. Kumar, V.V. Asokan, Advocates.



Judgment Text

1. WP (C) No. 33568 of 2005:


The point that arises for decision in this Writ Petition is whether the inclusion of Silk fabrics and sarees made of natural silk as item No. 116 in the 3rd schedule to the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003, is unconstitutional. The first petitioner is an Association of Textile and Garments Dealers of Kerala. The second petitioner is one of its members. All textile fabrics were excluded from the levy of sales tax and subsequently from the value added tax also. While so, the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was amended by the Kerala Value Added Tax (Amendment) Act, 2005 and Silk fabrics and sarees made of natural silk were included as serial No. 116 in the 3rd schedule to the KVAT Act. The result was that with effect from 28.8.2005, VAT at the rate of 4% was payable on Silk fabrics and sarees made of natural silk. The petitioners, aggrieved by the inclusion of the said item, as a taxable item under the KVAT Act, have filed this Writ Petition, seeking a declaration that the said amendment is unconstitutional and void.


2. Normally, it is for the Government to decide which are the goods to be subjected to tax. The State is conceded freedom to pick and choose any goods. But, the petitioners submit that in view of the provisions of the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1959, the State is incompetent to levy any sales tax on silk fabrics or natural silk. Their contention in this regard is expatiated, relying on Art.286(3) of the Constitution of India, which reads as follows:


"286. Restrictions as to imposition of tax on the sale or purchase of goods:--


(1) xxx xxxx


(2) xxxx xxxx


(3) Any law of a State shall, insofar as it imposes, or authorises the imposition of,--

(a) a tax on the sale or purchase of goods declared by Parliament by law to be of special importance in inter State trade or commerce; or


(b) a tax on the sale or purchase of goods, being a tax of the nature referred to in sub clause (b), sub clause (c ) or sub clause (d) of clause (29A) of Art.366, be subject to such restrictions and conditions in regard to the system of levy, rates and other incidents of the tax as Parliament may by law specify."


Woven fabrics of silk or of silk waste is included in the first schedule to the above said Act and the rate of levy is nil. When the above quoted Article is read with the provisions of the above said Act, hereinafter referred to as the ADE Act, if any State imposes any sales tax or VAT on woven fabrics of silk/silk waste, the said State will not get any share of the additional duty collected by the Central Government under the said Act for the said goods. The same is evident from schedule II of the said Act. The relevant sections in the ADE Act are S.3 and 4. They are quoted below for convenient reference:


"3. Levy and collection of additional duties:-- (1) There shall be levied and collected in respect of the goods described in column (3) of the First Schedule produced or manufactured in India and on all such goods lying in stock within the precincts of any factory, warehouse or other premises where the said goods were manufactured, stored or produced, or in any premises appurtenant thereto, duties of excise at the rate or rates specified in column (4) of the said Schedule.


(2) The duties of excise referred to in sub-s.(1) in respect of the goods specified therein shall be in addition to the duties of excise chargeable on such goods under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, or any other law for the time being in force.

(3) The provisions of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and the rules made thereunder, including those relating to refunds and exemptions from duty, offences and penalties, shall, so far as may be, apply in relation to the levy and collection of the additional duties as they apply in relation to the levy and collection of the duties of excise on the goods specified in sub-s.(1).


4. Distribution of additional duties among States:-- During each financial year, there shall be paid out of the Consolidated Fund of India to the States in accordance with the provisions of the Second Schedule such sums, representing a part of the net proceeds of the additional duties levied and collected during that financial year, as are specified in that Schedule."


3. The petitioners submit that in view of the decisions of the Apex Court in Godfrey Phillips India Ltd. v. State of U.P. 2005 (139) STC 537 and Reliance Trading Co. v. State of Kerala (2006 (147) STC 211 (SC), there is absolute prohibition of levy of any sales tax in relation to an item included in the first schedule to the ADE Act The learned counsel for the petitioners made special emphasis on paragraphs 65 and 72 of the decision in Godfrey Phillips India Ltd. (supra). The said paragraphs are quoted below:


"65. In December, 1956, the National Development Council, Planning Commission, Government of India, and the States agreed that the sales tax in respect of inter alia, tobacco should be replaced by a surcharge on the Central excise duties, the income derived therefrom being distributed amongst States on the basis of consumption, subject to the income from the States being assured. Pursuant to this and the recommendation of the Finance Commission in its report dated September 30, 1957, the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act 1957, was passed by Parliament The object of the Act was to impose additional duties of excise in replacement of the sales tax levied by the Union and the States on sugar, tobacco and mill made textiles and to distribute the net proceeds of these taxes, except the proceeds attributable to Union territories, to the States. Provision was made that the State which lew a tax on the sale or purchase of these commodities after the April 1, 1958, could not participate in the distribution of the net proceeds of the additional lew under the ADE Act. Provision was also being made in the Act for including specified goods in the category of goods declared to be of special importance in inter State trade or commerce so that, following the imposition of uniform duties of excise on them, the rates of sales tax if levied by any State were subject from April 1, 1958, to the restrictions in S.15 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.


xxxx xxxx xxxx

72. So, even if tobacco is an article of luxury, a tax on its supply is within the exclusive competence of the State but subject to the constitutional curbs prescribed under Art.286 read with Ss.14 and 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, and most importantly the APE Act of 1957 under which no sales tax can be levied on tobacco at all if the State was to take the benefits under that Act."

(Emphasis supplied)


The learned counsel for the petitioners also heavily relied on the following observations of the Apex Court in Reliance Trading Co. (supra):


"Further, admittedly, under the ADEA, additional duty is leviable on cotton based tarpaulin under the First Schedule to the aforesaid Act. Having regard to the objective behind enacting the ADEA, it is apparent that cotton based tarpaulin on which additional duty is levied under the ADEA was and continues to be exempt from sales tax. At this stage, it would be pertinent to refer to the exclusion clause in entry 11 in the Third Schedule to the KGST Act The exclusion clause means that where duty has not been levied under the ADEA such goods would be excluded from the purview of entry 11, to put it simply, the goods would lose their exemption under the KGST Act. For this reason also, we hold that cotton based tarpaulin is exempted from sales tax under the KGST Act."


The counsel further added, admittedly, fabrics of silk and other related products are included in Schedule I, though the rate of levy is nil. Thereafter, the State is denuded of the power to impose any sales tax for those products. Therefore, the petitioners pray for declaring that no tax can be levied or collected, though silk fabrics and sarees made of natural silk are included as item No. 116 in the third schedule to the KVAT Act


4. The respondents have filed a detailed counter affidavit, supporting the impugned levy. The learned senior Government Pleader (Taxes) appearing for the respondents would submit that the only consequence of levying tax in relation to an item included in the first schedule to the ADE Act is that the State cannot claim any share of the duty collected, as provided in the second schedule to the said Act. The power to levy tax on sale of goods is a power flowing from entry 54, List II of the seventh schedule to the Constitution of India. It is further pointed out that going by Art.286(3) also, the power of the Slate Government to tax on an item which is included in the first schedule to the ADE Act, is not abrogated. As stated earlier, the only consequence is the loss of revenue for the relevant year, as provided in the second schedule to the ADE Act.


5. The learned Government Pleader distinguished the decisions relied on by the learned counsel for the petitioners and further, in support of his submission, relied on the decision of this Court in Khataisons v. Addl. Sales Tax Officer (1994 (95) STC 197).


6. Going by the relevant provisions of the ADE Act and Art.286 (3) of the Constitution of India, I feel that the contention of the petitioners is plainly untenable. The only point to be considered is whether the Apex Court has made any binding declaration, which compels this Court to take a contrary view. Going by the decision in Godfrey Phillips India Ltd. (2005 (139) STC 537), relied on by me learned counsel for the petitioners, I feel that the same does not, in any way, support the case of the petitioners. On the contrary, the observations in paras 65 and 72 of the said judgment, wherein the Apex Court observed that if the State wants to take the benefit of the ADE Act, it should not impose any other levy on

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

the goods concerned, support the respondents. The point that arose in Reliance Trading Co. (2006 (147) STC 211) was entirely different. The goods concerned in that case, namely cotton based tarpaulin was exempted under entry 11 in the third schedule to the KGST Act. While so, the first schedule to the Act was amended, making cotton based tarpaulin a taxable item. The Apex Court was called upon to decide whether even thereafter the exemption under entry 11 of the third schedule remained in force for the said goods. The Court answered the question in the affirmative. The observations of the Apex Court in that decision will not in any way, advance the contentions of the petitioners that the State Legislature lacks power to levy tax once a particular commodity finds a place in schedule I to the ADE Act. In the result the Writ Petition fails and it is dismissed. 7. WP (C) Nos. 36386/2005, 90, 332, 4824, 5152, 6676, 8638 and 8818/2006: In view of the judgment in W.P.(C) No. 33568/2005, these Writ Petitions are also dismissed. In the circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

11-06-2020 M/s. E.V. Mathai & Sons, Represented by Its Managing Partner, Rubber Dealer, Kothamangalam Versus State of Kerala, Represented by The Secretary, Commercial Taxes Department, Thiruvananthapuram High Court of Kerala
08-06-2020 EHVEES, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited Dealer, Manjeri, Represented by M. Muhammed Gadhafi, Power of Attorney Holder, Shoukathali Versus The District Collector, Malappuram & Others High Court of Kerala
25-02-2020 M/s. Annapurna Dealer Pvt. Ltd. Versus Authorised Officer, Bank of Baroda High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
13-01-2020 Union of India rep. By its Enforcement Officer Enforcement Directorate Chennai Versus M/s. Raiments & Garments International, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
03-01-2020 The General Manager, Aleppy Parcel Service, Alappuzha Versus Anil Kumar V., Managing Partner, Wetex Garments, Poovattuparamba, Kozhikode Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
22-11-2019 The Management Scotts Garments Limited, Trippur Versus The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Coimbatore & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
14-10-2019 M/s. PJS Knit Garments, Rep.by its Partner, P. Sugansaran & Another Versus The Authorised Officer, Bank of Baroda, Tirupur Main Branch, Tirupur High Court of Judicature at Madras
09-09-2019 Pradeep Kumar Kushwaha Versus Shubham Krishi Kendra Dealer & Distributor & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
06-08-2019 M/s. Indo Skins Garments Private Limited, Represented by its Managing Director, N. Thiagarajan, Chennai Versus The Presiding Officer, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
24-07-2019 The Officer In Charge, Sub-Regional Provident Fund Office & Another Versus M/s Godavari Garments Limited Supreme Court of India
05-04-2019 The District Collector, Kanchipuram Versus M/s. Gupta Garments, Rep. by its Authorized Signatory Anil Gupta & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-04-2019 M/s. Ginni Garments & Another Versus M/s. Sethi Garments & Others High Court of Punjab and Haryana
04-04-2019 Ginni Garments and Others V/S Sethi Garments and Others. In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
13-03-2019 The Senior Divisional Mechanical Engineer, Southern Railway, Salem Division & Others Versus M/s. Premier Garments Processing, Rep. by its Proprietor Ibrahim Sha, Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
21-12-2018 Batra Garments Pvt. Ltd. Versus New India Assurance Co. Ltd. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
21-12-2018 Goodluck Garments Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & Cus., Surat-II High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
26-09-2018 Ram Kunwar Versus Dealer Jai Durga Tractor & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
24-09-2018 M/s. Premier Garments Processing, Rep. by its Proprietor, Ibrahim Sha, Chennai Versus The Divisional Railway Manager, Salem & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-08-2018 Gajanan Property Dealer & Construction Pvt. Ltd. & Others Versus State of Orissa & Another High Court of Orissa
06-08-2018 Tejashree Auto Authorised Dealer Ashok Layland, Nagpur Versus Shashikant Madhavrao Mangale & Others Maharshtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Nagpur
24-07-2018 Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd., (Now ECGC Limited), Chennai & Another Versus Zoro Garments Private Ltd., Rep.by its Managing Director, N.F. Mogrella High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-07-2018 M/s. Rasathe Garments, Rep by its Partner, Virudhunagar Versus The Commercial Tax Officer-I, Virudhunagar High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-07-2018 Bord for Industrial & Financial Reconstruction (B.I.F.R.) Versus Coromandel Garments Ltd. & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
06-07-2018 Shanthakoti Enterprises Quarry Owner & Exporters of Block Granites Dealer Versus State of Karnataka & Others High Court of Karnataka
20-06-2018 M/s. T. Chinnasamy Chettiar & Sons, HPCL Dealer (Terminated), Rep. by its Managing Partner C. Natarajan, Coimbatore District Versus The Chief Regional Manager, Retail and Constituted Attorney, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Coimbatore & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-04-2018 M/s. Sri Rengas Avitta Garments, Represented by its Partner, R. Rajaram & Another Versus R. Indira High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-04-2018 Kandukuri Garments Versus Inspector of Legal Metrology High Court of Karnataka
08-03-2018 M.R. Senguttuvan Versus The General Manager Tafe Reach Ltd, Tata Motors Dealer & Another Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Chennai
02-02-2018 Jagmohan Motors Ltd. (Maruti Authorized Dealer) Versus Hawa Singh & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
02-01-2018 A. Velumurugan Versus M/s. Sree Shiva Sakthi Garments, Represented by its Partner Venkatachalam, Tiruppur High Court of Judicature at Madras
11-12-2017 The Chief Regional Manager, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited & Another Versus M/s. Suresh Agencies, HPC Dealer, Rep.by Partner B. Nandakumar High Court of Judicature at Madras
22-11-2017 M/s. Sha Engineering Prop Suresh Sha Authorised Dealer for CRI Pumps & Another Versus T. Anbu Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Chennai
08-11-2017 M/s Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., through its Regional Manager (Retail) Versus M/s. Taj Petroleum, Dealer of H.P.C.L., through its Proprietor Shafiq Majid Sheikh In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
08-09-2017 M/s. Tricity Autos (Marauti Suzuki Authorized Dealer) Through Its Current Authorized Signatory Sidharth Garg & Another Versus Subhash Chand National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
04-08-2017 M/s. Joseph Trading Corporation, IOCL Dealer, rep. by its Partner P. Sathyanathan Versus The Union of India, rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
26-07-2017 Creative Garments Pvt. Ltd V/S C.C.E. & S.T. Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal West Zonal Bench At Ahmedabad
28-04-2017 T. Koteswara Rao Versus GEM Motors (India) Pvt. Ltd., Authorized Maruti Dealer, rep. by its Managing Director & Others Telangana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hyderabad
10-02-2017 The Management of Foundation Garments Pvt. Ltd. Represented by its Managing Director ?Divine Grace? Versus Government of Tamil Nadu Labour & Employment (A1) Department, Represented by its Principal Secretary High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-02-2017 Banala Ravali Versus Managing Director, & Authorized Dealer, M/s. Majestic Motors, Near Taj Mahal Hotel, Himayath Nagar, Hyderabad & Another Telangana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hyderabad
19-01-2017 R.K. Rajkumar Proprietor M/s. Koghima Garments Versus The Registrar Debts Recovery Tribunal - III Spencer Towers Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
17-01-2017 Kitex Garments Ltd., represented by its Managing Director-Sabu M. Jacob Versus State of Kerala, represented by Principal Secretary To Government, Taxes (H) Department & Another High Court of Kerala
02-01-2017 Sonal Garments V/S Commr. of Cus., Seaport (Import), Chennai Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal South Zonal Bench At Chennai
02-11-2016 M/s. Tractor Dealer Farm Equipment & Machinery Company Kutchery Road Raebareli Uttar Pradesh Versus Ghanshyam Maurya & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
27-10-2016 Indian Counter Equity Dealer a proprietory firm carrying on business at 303/2, Ivory Tower, Juhu Koliwada Beach, Santacruz (W), Mumbai & Others Versus Shehnaz Sani, Mumbai High Court of Judicature at Bombay
25-10-2016 K. Hari Prasad Versus The Manager, M/s. Malik Cars Pvt., Ltd., Authorised Dealer of Tata Motors & Fiat & Another Telangana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hyderabad
15-09-2016 M/s. Rasathe Garments Versus The Commercial Tax Officer-I (FAC) Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
02-09-2016 Carol Garments & Another Versus The Joint Director General of Foreign Trade, Coimbatore & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
30-06-2016 Sri Ram Agencies, HPCL Dealer, Rep. By its Prop. S. Gajendran Versus Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry Of Petroleum And Natural Gas, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
21-06-2016 M/s. Oxygen the Digital Shop, Pulimoottil Arcade, Kottayam & Another Versus Namadevan.L., Anna Garments & Others Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
27-05-2016 Kavin Motors Versus The Managing Partner, P. Senthilkumar, Shri Saravanagiri Agencies, Authorised Sub-dealer (YMC) Yamaha Motor Bikes, Dharapuram & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
28-03-2016 Brothers Service Station (Indian Oil Dealer) rep. by its Managing Partner, G.S. Narayana & Others Versus Vijayawada Municipal Corporation rep. by its Commissioner In the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad
12-02-2016 M/s. Anjal Garments Versus Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
04-01-2016 Prabhash Kumar Agarwalla Versus M/s Shree Balaji, Authorised Dealer, Century Ply Woods (India) Ltd. Jharkhand State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Ranchi
17-09-2015 Shree Tapagachiya Atma Kamal Labhdisuriswarji Gyanmandir Trust Versus Bombay Mutton Dealer Association & Others Supreme Court of India
14-09-2015 The Bombay Mutton Dealer Association & Another Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
04-09-2015 M/s. Super Cassettes Industries Versus M/s. Singla Property Dealer Limited High Court of Punjab and Haryana
02-09-2015 M/s Himatsingka Brothers, Authorised Dealer, Mahindra & Mahindra Pvt. Ltd. & Others Versus Shankar Mandal & Another Jharkhand State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Ranchi
24-08-2015 Provident Fund Commissioner Versus M/s. Bena Garments High Court of Judicature at Bombay
01-07-2015 Kanhaiyalal Rawat Versus Dealer Angad Tractor National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
11-06-2015 S. Edayachandran Versus The Authorised Dealer MPL Ford India Pvt. Ltd. & Others Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Chennai
05-06-2015 M/s. Triven Garments Ltd., represented by its Managing Director & Others Versus State represented by the Sub-Inspector of Police & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
17-03-2015 The Dealer(Sales) M/s Lodha Honda Motors Near Railway Gate Murugan Temple & Others Versus R. Krishnamoorthy Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Chennai
27-02-2015 SCM Garments (P.) Ltd. Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle-III, Coimbatore Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai
27-01-2015 M.T. James Versus Manu Sreenivasan Managing Director, Authorized Dealer Unique Diesels Pvt. Ltd. & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
14-01-2015 Lalan Singh Versus Mahesh Pratap Singh Dealer Sonalika Tractor Agency & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-12-2014 Nelly Garments Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
26-11-2014 Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-II Versus Ankit Garments Manufacturing Co. High Court of Delhi
07-11-2014 KMC Textiles & Garments, rep.by its Proprietor, Shaj Mohammed Versus The Chief Manager & Authorized Officer, Indian Bank, Trichy Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
24-10-2014 Board of Investment of Sri Lanka Versus Million Garments (PVT) Ltd. Supreme Court of Sri Lanka
28-08-2014 Sakthi Fashions, Manufacturers & Exporters of Fabrics and Garments, Represented by its Proprietrix Versus Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd, Represented by its General Manager Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Chennai
19-08-2014 The Proprietor, M/s. M.A. Ahammed Ravuther & Co., Dealer Bharath Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Versus M. Sureshkumar Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
08-08-2014 Subhash Versus M/s. Gautam Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. The Authorized Dealer, M/s Ashok Leyland Through its Proprietor & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
24-06-2014 C. Srinath Versus M/s.Kun Hyundai, Selling Dealer Kun Auto Company, Private Limited, Rep by General Manager & Another Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Chennai
11-06-2014 National Insurance Company Ltd. Versus M/s. Ess Ell Garments Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Chandigarh
01-05-2014 Sri Priyaluckshmi Garments Represented by Mrs. G. Mahalakshmi, Partner & Others Versus The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
29-04-2014 Vijay Karlekar, Proprietor, M/s. New Keerthi Garments & Another Versus Karnataka State Financial Corporation & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
25-04-2014 In Re Jagadamba Garments Marketing Pvt. Ltd. & Another High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
02-04-2014 Arun Versus Sangmeshwar Tractor Authorized dealer Ahmedpur Through its proprietor, Dhanraj vainath Chaware & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
26-02-2014 M/s. Lakshya Garments through its Proprietor Versus National Insurance Company Limited National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
30-12-2013 P. Ramakrishna Rao, Proproetor, Sri Ganesh Motors, Authorized Dealer for Sonalika Tractors Versus Yeddula Kristappa & Others Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hyderabad
09-12-2013 Ramesh Bhandari Versus Swami Auto Sales, Authorized Dealer of M/s. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. through its authorized signatory & Others Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Chandigarh
05-12-2013 M/s. Sansai Motors Private Limited, Addanki by-pass road of Nalgonda Town and District. Represented by its Authorized Dealer Versus M. Srinivas Reddy Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hyderabad
29-11-2013 Mrs. Banala Ravali Versus Managing Director and Authorized dealer M/s Majestic Motors, Near Taj Mahal Hotel Himayathnagar & Others Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hyderabad
30-10-2013 Madan Lal Suryavanshi Versus Shahrukh Pasi, Authorized dealer of M/s. PASCOS & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
25-09-2013 The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Versus M/s. Anjali Silks & Garments High Court of Karnataka
16-08-2013 Sheena Prakash M/s. Chettuva Fuels, HPCL Dealer Versus Union of India, represented by Secretary & Others High Court of Kerala
11-07-2013 Sanjiv Kalia, Dealer, M/s. Balaji Diagnostic Versus Dr. S.C. Garg & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
26-04-2013 M/s. Viking Garments, (A Partnership Firm) Versus United India Insurance Company Ltd. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
10-04-2013 Rajendra Prasad Tripathi Versus The Manager, Agrawal Motors, Dealer, Baldeobagh Jabalpur (M.P.) & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
09-04-2013 A.J. Ramadoss Versus S. Padmavathy and N. Sankar(spouse) Om Siva Sakthi Garments National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
23-03-2013 Sarwan Singh Versus The Manager, M/s. Bedi Auto Mobiles Authorized Dealer & Another Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Shimla
27-02-2013 Satinder Pal Singh Versus Modern Tractors, General Sales and Service Dealer for Escorts Farm & Another Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Chandigarh
14-11-2012 CC&CE, Guntur Versus M/s. Kandukuri Garments (P) Ltd. Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal South Zonal Bench At Bangalore
12-10-2012 M/s. C.S. Garments & Another Versus The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Tirupur High Court of Judicature at Madras
11-10-2012 Duggireddy Naga Lakshumma Versus The Dealer, Castrol India Ltd. & Others Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hyderabad
17-08-2012 M/s Gem Motors (India) Pvt Ltd., authorized Maruti Dealer Sy.No.64, Kondapur & Another Versus N. Naga Sreenivasulu & Others Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hyderabad
06-08-2012 Commissioner of Income Tax Versus First Garments Manufacturing Co. India (P) Ltd High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-07-2012 Sri N.R. Selvaraj Versus M/s.Malik Cars, represented by Manager (Passenger Car Dealer) Opp:Taj Banjara & Others Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hyderabad
24-07-2012 M/s. Rasamal Fuel Centre Dealer: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, Rep by its Proprietary Kancheepuram District Versus The Deputy General Manager (Ops/TNSO) Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
29-06-2012 Bale Narsaiah S/o.Rajaiah Versus M/s. Surya Motors, Authorized Dealer for Swaraj Tractors Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hyderabad