w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Jayakumar Assistant Professor-Cum-Assistant Director, Centre For Social Exclusion & Inclusion, Cochin University of Science & Technology, Kochi & Others v/s Dr. Jyothi S. Nair & Others


Company & Directors' Information:- P C TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74900DL2015PTC278616

    WA. Nos. 805 to 807 of 2017 & 1713, 1744 & 1792 of 2018

    Decided On, 16 March 2020

    At, High Court of Kerala

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. SHAFFIQUE & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH

    For the Appearing Parties: George Poonthottam, Sr. Advocate, Raju Joseph, Sr. Advocate, Thomas Abraham, SC, Nisha George, C. Joseph Antony, Kaleeswaram Raj, A. Aruna, Varun C. Vijay, Thomas Abraham, G.S. Reghunath, Advocates.



Judgment Text


Shaffique, J.

1. WA No.1792/2018 is filed by the University of Kerala and its officers challenging the judgment in WP(C) No. 2951/2013. The writ petition is filed by a candidate who applied for the post of Lecturer in Sociology as per notification issued by University of Kerala (hereinafter referred to as 'the University') on 13/6/2011. According to her, though she was qualified for being appointed as a Lecturer as per the specifications in the notification and Regulations prescribed by UGC, she challenged the action of the University in considering the 4th respondent Dr.M.S.Jayakumar for the said post. The contention of the petitioner was that the 4th respondent did not have NET qualification and hence not qualified to be considered for appointment as per the UGC (Minimum qualification for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and other Measure for the Maintenance of the Standards in Higher Education) Regulations, 2010. Similar contentions were raised in WP(C) Nos.20055 & 21902/2012. The learned Single Judge based on the judgment of the Full Bench of this Court in Radhakrishnan Pillai v. Travancore Devaswom Board (2016 (2) KLT 245 (FB)] held that the UGC Regulations 2010 is deemed to have come into effect from 18/9/2010 and in so far as NET exemption has been granted in the 2010 UGC Regulations only to those who acquired Ph.D. as per norms, 4th respondent was not qualified merely for the reason that 4th respondent had a Ph.D qualification and therefore he could not have been appointed. Accordingly, a direction had been issued to the University to rework the score sheet after awarding appropriate marks to the petitioners strictly in accordance with UGC Regulations, 2010.

2. The 4th respondent has filed WA No. 805/2017 against the judgment in WP(C) No. 21902/2012, WA No. 806/2017 against WP(C) No. 2951/2013 and WA No. 807/2017 against WP(C) No.20055/2012. WA No. 1713/18 has been filed by University of Kerala and others against the judgment in WP(C) No. 20055/2012 and WA No. 1744/2018 has been filed by them against the judgment in WP(C) No. 21902/2012.

3. One of the contentions urged by the appellants is that the UGC Regulations had not been adopted by the University at the time of issuance of notification inviting applications and therefore, the norms prescribed in the University notification dated 23/10/2007 applies for granting index marks for the selection of teachers in the University departments. It was also contended that against the judgment in Radhakrishnan Pillai's case (supra), the University as well as the affected persons had approached the Apex Court by filing Special Leave Petitions which are pending. When the above appeal came up for hearing, the Apex Court had already approved the judgment in Radhakrishnan Pillai's case (supra) by order dated 17/7/2018. However, the Special Leave Petitions were disposed of by issuing a clarification that the said judgment in Radhakrishnan Pillai's case (supra) dated 23/2/2016 will be applicable only from the date of judgment except in the case of individual parties before the High Court. It was further made clear that in case any University has amended the statutes prior to the date of judgment, the effect of the Regulations will be from the date as indicated in the amendment or the date of the actual order of implementation of the statutes. In so far as this writ petitions were pending before this Court, definitely the petitioners are entitled for the benefit of judgment in Radhakrishnan Pillai's case (supra).

4. As far as the 4th respondent, who is the appellant in WA Nos.805, 806 and 807/17 is concerned, his Ph. D qualification is not in terms with the 2010 Regulations. In the 2010 Regulations, exemption had been granted for Ph.D holders in acquiring NET qualification only when Ph.D degree has been given to them in compliance with Regulations 2009 of UGC (Minimum Standards and Procedures for the award of M.Phil/Ph.D Degree). In a judgment of the Apex Court in State of Madhya Pradesh v. Manoj Sharma and Others [(2018) 3 SCC 329] decided on 25/1/2018, the Apex Court held at paragraphs 16 and 17 as under:-

“16. It has to be noticed that the amendment as made in the minimum qualification, now provides that the exemption from NET shall be given to the PhD degree-holders, only when PhD degree has been awarded to them in compliance with the 2009 Regulations of UGC (Minimum Standards and Procedure). The above provision thus, made it mandatory that for Lecturers NET qualification is necessary and exemption shall be granted to those PhD degree-holders who have obtained PhD degree in accordance with the 2009 Regulations of UGC (Minimum Standards and Procedure). The purpose and object of the above amendments in both the 2009 Regulations of UGC (Minimum Standards and Procedure) as well as the 2009 Regulations of UGC (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment) is not far to seek. There has been challenge to amendments made in the 2009 Regulations of UGC (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment) insofar as it denied the benefit to PhD degreeholders who had obtained PhD prior to 11-7-2009. The writ petitions were filed in different High Courts challenging the Regulations on different grounds including that the Regulations are arbitrary and violative of Article 14 which discriminate the PhD degree-holders who have obtained PhD degree prior to 11- 7-2009 and those who obtained the degree after 11-7-2009 in accordance with the 2009 Regulations of UGC (Minimum Standards and Procedure).

17. The challenge to the Regulations was repelled by different High Courts whereas the Allahabad High Court vide its judgment dated 6-4-2012 in Ramesh Kumar Yadav v. University of Allahabad [Ramesh Kumar Yadav v. University of Allahabad, 2012 SCC OnLine All 667 : (2013) 4 All LJ 635] has upheld the challenge. The appeals were filed against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court [Ravindra Singh Shekhawat v. Union of India, 2012 SCC OnLine Raj 2751 : (2013) 4 RLW 3094] , the Delhi High Court [All India Researchers' Coordination Committee v. Union of India, 2010 SCC OnLine Del 4304 : (2011) 121 DRJ 297] and the Madras High Court [P. Suseela v. UGC, 2010 SCC OnLine Mad 6041 : (2011) 2 CTC 593] by the candidates whose writ petitions were dismissed as well as against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 6-4-2012 [Ramesh Kumar Yadav v. University of Allahabad, 2012 SCC OnLine All 667 : (2013) 4 All LJ 635] , upholding the contention of the candidates. This Court decided all the appeals by its judgment in P. Suseela v. UGC [P. Suseela v. UGC, (2015) 8 SCC 129 : (2015) 2 SCC (L&S) 633 : 7 SCEC 333] . This Court upheld the judgment of the High Courts of Rajasthan [Ravindra Singh Shekhawat v. Union of India, 2012 SCC OnLine Raj 2751 : (2013) 4 RLW 3094] , Madras [P. Suseela v. UGC, 2010 SCC OnLine Mad 6041 : (2011) 2 CTC 593] and Delhi [All India Researchers' Coordination Committee v. Union of India, 2010 SCC OnLine Del 4304 : (2011) 121 DRJ 297] and set aside the judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 6-4-2012 [Ramesh Kumar Yadav v. University of Allahabad, 2012 SCC OnLine All 667 : (2013) 4 All LJ 635] , upholding that the amendments made in the 2009 Regulations of UGC (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment) were valid and there is a valid classification between the candidates who have obtained degree prior to the 2009 Regulations of UGC (Minimum Standards and Procedure) and those who obtained the degree in accordance with the abovesaid Regulation”.

5. Yet another contention urged by the appellants is based on an amendment to the Regulations made as per notification dated 11/7/2016. The Regulations is called as the University Grants Commission (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education) (4th Amendment) Regulations, 2016. Regulation 3 of the 4th Amendment Regulations, 2016 reads as under:

“3. The proviso prescribed under Regulation 3.3.1, 4.4.1, 4.4.2, 4.4.2.2, 4.4.2.3, 4.5.3 and 4.6.3 in the University Grants Commission (Minimum qualifications for appointment of teachers and other academic staff in Universities and Colleges and other measures for the maintenance of standards in higher education) (3th Amendment) Regulations, 2016 regarding exemption to the candidates registered for Ph.D. programme prior to July 11, 2009 shall stand amended and be read as under:-

“Provided further, the award of degree to candidates registered for the M.Phil/Ph.D programme prior to July 11, 2009, shall be governed by the provisions of the then existing Ordinances/Bylaws/Regulations of the Institutions awarding the degree and the Ph.D candidates shall be exempted from the requirement of NET/SLET/SET for recruitment and appointment of Assistant Professor or equivalent positions in Universities/Colleges/Institutions subject to the fulfillment of the following conditions:-

a) Ph.D. degree of the candidate awarded in regular mode only;

b) Evaluation of the Ph.D. thesis by at least two external examiners;

c) Open Ph.D. viva voce of the candidate had been conducted;

d) Candidate has published two research papers from his/her Ph.D. work out of which at least one must be in a refereed journal;

e) Candidate has made at least two presentations in conferences/seminars, based on his/her Ph.D work.

(a) to (e) as above are to be certified by the ViceChancellor/Pro-Vice-Chancellor/Dean(Academic Affairs)/Dean(University instructions).”

6. By virtue of Regulation 3 aforesaid, the proviso to 3rd Amendment Regulations inter alia provided that those candidates who had registered for M.Phil/Ph.D Programme prior to 11th July, 2009 shall be governed by the provisions of the then existing Ordinances/Bye laws/Regulations of the Institutions awarding the Degree and the Ph.D candidates shall be exempted from the requirement of NET qualification subject to fulfilling th

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

e specifications provided in (a) to (e) thereunder. The contention of the counsel for appellants is that this notification has retrospective operation whereas the respondents contended that in so far as in Regulation 1.3 of the Regulation, it has been stated that it shall come into force with immediate effect and from the date of publication in the official gazette, it has only prospective operation. This is a case in which the interview was conducted on 3/8/2012 and the Selection Committee had finalised the selection in the meeting held on 3rd and 4th of August, 2012. What is being considered in the case is with reference to a selection made prior to 2016 (4th Amendment) Regulations coming into force. Under such circumstances, we do not think that the appellants are entitled to claim any benefit based on the 2016 (4th Amendment) Regulations. In the light of the aforesaid proposition of law, we do not think that the learned Single Judge had committed any error in issuing the aforesaid directions by allowing the writ petitions. Since no grounds are made out for interference, writ appeals are dismissed.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

14-07-2020 Rajeev Gandhi Memorial College of Engineering & Technology & Another Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh & Others Supreme Court of India
19-06-2020 The Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur & Another Versus Dr. Subroto Roy & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
26-05-2020 O.R. Rahul & Others Versus Indian Institute of Space Science & Technology, Represented by Its Registrar, Thiruvananthapuram & Others High Court of Kerala
19-05-2020 M.G. Narasimha Rao Versus The Chairman, Board of Governors, Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-05-2020 Vestas Wind Technology India Private Limited Versus The Commercial Tax Officer, Enforcement, Roving Squad, Chengalpet & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
12-05-2020 Score Information Technology Ltd. Versus Central Organisation, Ex-Serviceman Contributory Health Scheme High Court of Delhi
04-05-2020 M/s. Cognizant Technology Solutions India Pvt. Ltd V/S The Assistant Commissioner of Labour And Two Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
04-05-2020 M/s. Cognizant Technology Solutions India Pvt. Ltd., rep. by its Authorized Signatory Versus The Appellate Authority under Section 48(1) of the A.P. Shops & Establishments Act, 1988 & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
18-03-2020 Abhighyan Bhattacharya & Another Versus School Of Engineering & Technology & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
13-03-2020 Syrma Technology Private Limited, Chennai Versus Powerwave Technologies Sweden AD (in bankruptcy), Rep., by the Bankruptcy Administrator, Niklas Korling & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
05-03-2020 Dr.(Mrs) Sania Akhtar, Working as Principal Director (Senior Principal Scientist), Central Institute of Plastics Engineering & Technology SARP, Bangalore Versus The Director General, Central Institute of Plastics Engineering & Technology, Ministry of Chemical & Fertilizers, Guindy, Chennai & Another Central Administrative Tribunal Bangalore Bench
05-03-2020 Dinesh Kumar Rao Versus G.B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology & Others High Court of Uttarakhand
04-03-2020 Cognizant Technology Solutions India Pvt. Limited V/S Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Large Tax Payer Unit-1 Supreme Court of India
04-03-2020 Anil Ramdas Pawar V/S Union of India, Through Secretary, Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, Department of Telecommunications & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
04-03-2020 S. Aruputharaj Versus Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Secretary, Education, Science & Technology, Madras & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
25-02-2020 M/s. Cognizant Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd. Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Large Taxpayer Unit-I & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-02-2020 M.I.E.T. Engineering College, Rep. by its Chairman, Er.A. Mohamed Yunus, Trichy & Others Versus The Registrar, Anna University of Technology, Guindy & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
14-02-2020 The Anna University, Rep. by its Registrar, Anna University Campus, Chennai Versus Mahendra Institute of Technology, Rep. by its Principal, Namakkal & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-02-2020 Daniel Oommen Versus National Institute of Technology, Kozhikode, Represented by Its Registrar & Others High Court of Kerala
12-02-2020 Richa Jindal Versus Pec University of Technology & Another High Court of Punjab and Haryana
10-02-2020 Achal Bisht Versus Chandigarh Institute of Hotel Management & Catering Technology & Another High Court of Punjab and Haryana
05-02-2020 Rasi Travels & Cargo Pvt. Ltd., Chennai & Another Versus Interglobe Technology Quotient Pvt. Ltd., A company having its Registered Office at Janpath, New Delhi & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
03-02-2020 Syndicate Bank V/S Narayanadri Institute of Science And Technology and Others. Debts Recovery Tribunal Hyderabad
17-01-2020 Masaddar Ali Laskar, Officer Surveyor, Office of the Director GDC, Assam Nagaland, GDC Versus The Union of India, Through the Secretary, To the Government of India, Department of Science & Technology, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
13-01-2020 The Principal , Global Institute of Fashion Technology (GIFT) & Another Versus Bikramadittya Sai & Others West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
07-01-2020 Commissioner of Income Tax, "Aaykar Bhavan" Versus Gigabyte Technology (India) Ltd. In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
06-01-2020 Union of India, Represented by Its Secretary, Department of Posts, Ministry of Communication & Information Technology, New Delhi Versus Shibu M. Job, Now Working as Director (Postal Life Insurance), Kolkatha & Others High Court of Kerala
17-12-2019 M/s. Lanco Hills Technology Park Pvt Ltd. Versus Manisha Balkrishna Kulkarni & Another Supreme Court of India
11-12-2019 D.R. College of Engg. & Technology, College Campus at V&PO Kakoda Versus Nitin Parashar Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission New Delhi
02-12-2019 Basava Engineering School of Technology Rep. by its Principal B.J. Patil Versus State of Karnataka Rep. by its Prl. Secretary Department of Technical Education High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench OF Kalaburagi
26-11-2019 Mahendra Institute of Technology, Rep. by its Principal, Salem Versus The Anna University, Rep. by its Registrar, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
21-11-2019 The Registrar, National Institute of Fashion Technology, N.I.F.T. Campus, Taramani, Chennai & Another Versus Sam D. Raja Prabhu & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-11-2019 Biju Borah Versus Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, To the Department of Posts, Government of India, Ministry of Communication Information & Technology, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
13-11-2019 Majaffar Hussain Versus The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Communications & Information Technology, Department of Posts, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
08-11-2019 Ranjit Sukla Baidya, Tripura Versus Union of India, Represented by the Secretary cum Commissioner, Department of Post, Ministry of Communication & Technology, Government of India, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
29-10-2019 K.A. Mohammed Manikfan, Junior Scientific Officer, Department of Science & Technology, Kavaratti Versus Union of India, Rep. by The Administrator, Union Territory of Lakshadweep, Kavaratti & Others High Court of Kerala
23-10-2019 Teledata Technology Solutions Versus Official Liquidator High Court of Judicature at Madras
11-10-2019 R. Rajkumar & Others Versus Union of India, Represented by Its Principal Secretary, Ministry of Science & Technology, Department of Science & Technology, New Delhi & Another High Court of Kerala
26-09-2019 Snehacharya Institute of Management & Technology Versus State of Kerala High Court of Kerala
11-09-2019 Ramsay Exim & Technology Private Limited & Others ICICI Bank Limited & Another High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
06-09-2019 Cognizant Technology Solutions India Pvt. Ltd., Chennai Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Large Tax Payer Unit, Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
29-08-2019 Dr. G. Sadasivan Nair, Rtd. Professor & Director of School of Legal Studies, Cochin University of Science & Technology, Kochi & Another Versus Cochin University of Science & Technology, Represented by Its Registrar, Kochi & Others High Court of Kerala
20-08-2019 Sudhan Ranjan Bhowmik Versus Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Department of Science & Technology, Ministry of Science & Technology, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
19-08-2019 Bharti Airtel Limited & Another Versus Maharashtra Information Technology Corporation Limited & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
08-08-2019 Software Technology Parks of India, Chennai Versus Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
08-08-2019 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary to Government Environment, Forests, Science & Technology Department, Secretariat, Guntur District & Others Versus R.V. Prakash High Court of Andhra Pradesh
06-08-2019 Tapas Malakar Versus The Union of India Represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Communication & Information Technology, Government of India, Central Secretariat, New Delhi & Others High Court of Tripura
02-08-2019 Global Institute of Fashion Technology (G.I.F.T) Versus Shaista Parveen West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
31-07-2019 M.J.R. College of Engineering & Technology, Rep., by its Principal, G.V. Ramu & Another Versus State of Andhra Pradesh and Corporation Bank, Damalacheruvu Rep., by its Branch Manager, Sudhir Kumar Dubey High Court of Andhra Pradesh
26-06-2019 Apeejay Institute of Technology School of Architecture & Planning & Another Versus Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University & Others Supreme Court of India
25-06-2019 Hindustan College of Science & Technology Versus All India Council for Technical Education & Another High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
25-06-2019 M/s. Cognizant Technology Solutions India Pvt. Ltd., Chennai Versus The Commissioner of Income Tax, Larger Taxpayer Unit, Nungambakkam High Court of Judicature at Madras
24-06-2019 Sri Nandhanam College of Engineering and Technology, Molagarampatti, Tiruppattur, Rep. by its Chairman, P.M.N. Mohan Krishnaa Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-06-2019 The Cochin Institute of Science & Technology, Ettappally, Ernakulam, Represented by Its Principal Dr. S.R. Deepa Versus Jisin Jijo & Others High Court of Kerala
03-06-2019 Kiran Murali & Another Versus Computer Sciences Corporation India Pvt. Ltd., (A Company incorporate under the Companies Act, 1956) Having its Office at Softward Technology Park, Electronics Complex, Madhya Pradesh & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
03-06-2019 The Director, Rajagiri School of Engineering & Technology, Kochi & Others Versus A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technological University, Represented by Its Registrar, Thiruvananthapuram & Others High Court of Kerala
31-05-2019 Sagnik Pal & Others Versus National Institute of Technology, Agartala & Others High Court of Tripura
28-05-2019 M/s. Teleecare Network India Pvt. Ltd. Versus M/s. Asus Technology Pvt. Ltd. & Others High Court of Delhi
23-05-2019 Kamal Sharma & Others Versus Union of India through Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Science & Technology, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh Bench
14-05-2019 Ram Govind Institute of Technology, Mahuvan, Koderma Versus State of Jharkhand High Court of Jharkhand
08-05-2019 M/s. Ipjacket Technology India Versus M.D. Uttar Pradesh Rajkiya Nirman High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
06-05-2019 Anuradha Chakraborty Versus The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Communication & Information Technology, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
02-05-2019 Medirad Tech India Limited & Another Versus Technology Development Board High Court of Delhi
30-04-2019 Ind Trust Travels and Cargo Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Director Versus Interglobe Technology Quotient Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Director High Court of Judicature at Madras
24-04-2019 Immanuel Arasar International Institute of Science & Technology Educational Charitable Trust rep. by its Founder Trustee Sam G.Jebajoselin Versus The Regional Officer, Southern Regional Office, AICTE & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
18-04-2019 Ashutosh Bansal Versus Birla Institute of Management & Technology & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
12-04-2019 Akshansh Gupta Versus Department of Science & Technology & Others High Court of Delhi
05-04-2019 VESTAS Wind Technology India Private Limited, (Production Business Unit), Rep. by V.P/Factory Manager, Chennai Versus M. Arul Prakasam & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-04-2019 Binud Sonowal Versus Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to the Department of Posts, Government of India, Ministry of Communication, Information & Technology, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
01-04-2019 Lakhidhar Das Versus The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to the Department of Posts, Government of India, Ministry of Communication Information & Technology, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
01-04-2019 Vestas Wind Technology India Private Limited & Another Versus M/s. Inox Renewables Limited & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
01-04-2019 Kerlinmon Kharshandi, SP (HQ), Itanagar Versus The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Communication & Information Technology, Department of Post of Revenue Central Board of Excise, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
28-03-2019 S.K. Shivakumar, Junior attendant, Central Library, IIT Madras Versus The Director, Indian Institute of Technology, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
26-03-2019 In the Matter of: M/s. APM Group Limited Versus M/s. Adept Technology Private Limited National Company Law Tribunal Chennai
22-03-2019 P. Muhammed Abdul Gafoor Versus The Secretary to The Government, Government of Kerala, Information Technology Department, Thiruvananthapuram & Others High Court of Kerala
19-03-2019 D. Thulaseedharan Nair Versus Mohandas College of Engineering & Technology, Thiruvananthapuram & Others High Court of Kerala
15-03-2019 The Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Pune - III Versus B.J. Shirke Construction Technology Pvt. Ltd. High Court of Judicature at Bombay
08-03-2019 Dr. V. Madhu Versus Cochin University of Science & Technology (Cusat), Represented by Its Registrar & Another High Court of Kerala
07-03-2019 Birla Institute of Technology Versus State of Jharkhand & Others Supreme Court of India
25-02-2019 CNH Industrial (India) Pvt. Ltd. Versus Tirth Agro Technology Pvt. Ltd. High Court of Delhi
20-02-2019 Jogesh Das Versus Union of India, Represented by Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Telecommunication & Information Technology, Department of Telecommunication, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
20-02-2019 Atul Kumar Mittal Versus Indian Institute of Technology Delhi Through its Registrar & Others High Court of Delhi
31-01-2019 Vellore Institute of Technology, (Deemed University), Represented by its Chancellor, Vellore Versus The Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
25-01-2019 M/s. Velammal Institute of Technology, Represented by its Chairman “Velammal Knowledge Park”, Thiruvallur Versus The Chairman Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Anna Salai, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
17-01-2019 Bijit Boro Versus Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to the Department of Posts, Government of India, Ministry of Communication Information & Technology, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
16-01-2019 Binay Bhattacharyya Versus The Proprietor, Gandhi Institute of Management & Technology Prop. Sarbani Das West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
10-01-2019 E.K. Shahabudeen Versus Union of India Represented by the Secretary to Government of India & Director General of Posts, Department of Posts, Ministry of Communication & Information Technology, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Ernakulam Bench
09-01-2019 Win Information Technology Versus Dcit, Circle-17(2), Hyderabad Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad
09-01-2019 Birla Institute of Technology Versus State of Jharkhand & Others Supreme Court of India
08-01-2019 Monsanto Technology LLC Thru The Authorised Representative Ms. Natalia Voruz & Others Versus Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd. Thru The Director & Others Supreme Court of India
07-01-2019 Birla Institute of Technology Versus State of Jharkhand & Others Supreme Court of India
03-01-2019 Sanjay Sarkar Versus Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Communication & Information Technology, Department of Telecommunication, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
03-01-2019 The Chairman, College of Engineering & Technology, Harshith Group of Institutions Versus Syed Yousuf Nasheed & Another Telangana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hyderabad
02-01-2019 M/s. Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd. Versus Software Technology Parks of India, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-12-2018 Md. S. Rahman & Another Versus Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Science & Technology, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
03-12-2018 Asha TM (USN: 1SP13EC010) & Others Versus Principal S.E.A. College of Engineering & Technology & Others High Court of Karnataka
03-12-2018 Union of India Represented by The Executive Engineer, Central Public Works Department, (Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India) Trivandrum Versus Advanced Polymer Technology, Represented by Its Power of Attorney Holder, Rajiv Kumar & Others High Court of Kerala
30-11-2018 Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Versus M/s. Rajeev Gandhi Institute of Petroleum Technology Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Lucknow
27-11-2018 Mohit Mahajan Versus Foundation For Innovation & Technology Transfer (FITT) & Others High Court of Delhi
22-11-2018 Debajit Patar Versus Union of India, Rep. by the Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Communication & Information Technology, Department of Posts, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati