w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Jai Joseph v/s State of Karnataka, Represented by its State Public Prosecutor, Bengaluru


Company & Directors' Information:- JOSEPH AND CO PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U01211KL1954PTC000507

Company & Directors' Information:- E R JOSEPH & CO PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U28920WB1955PTC022404

    Criminal Petition No. 3124 of 2020

    Decided On, 16 July 2020

    At, High Court of Karnataka

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. SOMASHEKAR

    For the Petitioner: D. Mohan Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent: K. Nageshwarappa, HCGP.



Judgment Text


(Prayer: This Criminal Petition is filed Under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.No.30 of 2020 registered by Suddaguntepalya Police Station, Bengaluru City for the offence punishable under Sections 80(C), 21(B), 20(B)(Ii)(C) of NDPS Act.)

Through Video Conferencing:

1. This petition is filed by petitioner-accused No.1 under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in Crime No.30 of 2020 of Suddaguntepalya Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 80(c), 21(b), 20(b) (ii) (c) of NDPS Act. The petitioner is said to be in judicial custody since from the date of his arrest.

2. Factual matrix of the petition is as under: It is stated in the complaint that, on receiving credible information that on 03.03.2020, a person will come near Tavarekere bus stand on Aralikatte to sell the drugs to the customer, the complainant informed the same to the ACP of Mico Layout Sub Division and after obtaining permission from the concerned authority, formed a team consisting of pancha witnesses and staff members and went to the spot. At about 10.15 a.m. on the said date, a White Hyundai Car yellow board bearing registration No.KA 01 AJ 7750 came to the spot and two persons got down from the car and one person was holding a cloth bag and they went near the Aralikatte and waiting for the customers. At that time, the complainant and other apprehended the accused and on personal search, they found 1 kg 50 grams of Hashish oil, MDMA 3.5 grams and ganja 2 kgs. They seized the said items. They also seized white car and one cloth bag. They drew panchanama and arrested the accused persons.

3. In pursuance of the complaint filed by the complainant, a case in Crime No.30 of 2020 came to be registered for the aforesaid offences. Thereafter, the investigating officer took up the case for investigation. In the said FIR, the petitioner is arraigned as accused No.1. The case is still under investigation by the investigating officer. The investigating officer also requires to record the statement of witnesses as well as to secure the material documents in order to lay the charge sheet.

4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned HCGP for respondent State.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has taken me through the averments made in the complaint, so also the progress of the case. He contends that the crime came to be registered on the basis of the information given by the informant to the investigating agency. The investigating agency has formed a team consisting of pancha witnesses so also the staff members. He contends that the accused is innocent person and he has not at all involved in the alleged offence. He has been apprehended by the investigating agency on the guise that the aforesaid contraband articles have been found in the possession of the accused and they have seized the same in the presence of the pancha witnesses. But the theory is set by the investigating agency by recording FIR. He contends that the investigating agency have not followed the mandatory requirement relating to the offence under the NDPS Act, in respect of the search of contraband articles which was found in the possession of the accused by securing the presence of the Gazetted Ofifcers. That the contention is also taken by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that in addition to that, the entire allegations made against the accused by recording the FIR, is only based upon the written complaint made by the police officer who given information to the concerned ACP for giving permission to proceed with the case for investigation against the person who is arraigned as accused. That the entire material in respect of FIR for having seized the contraband articles on record to make out a prima facie material against the accused to commit the alleged offence. But the accused is in judicial custody since from the date of arrest and moreover accused has no previous bad antecedents and the accused is having deep roots in the society. This fact is required to be considered. Lastly, he contends that the petitioner is ready to abide by any terms and conditions to be imposed by this Court while considering this bail petition. These are all the contentions as taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner and seeks for allowing this petition by granting bail to the petitioner.

7. Per contra, learned HCGP for the State has taken me through the involvement of this accused in the commission of crime and also he having found in the possession of contraband articles of ganja oil and also ganja weighing 2 kgs. and that the accused was present in the scene of crime for selling the aforesaid contraband articles. Therefore, informant given information to the ACP of Mico Layout Sub Division and thereafter, obtaining permission from the competent authority proceeded for investigation of the case by forming a team consisting of pancha witnesses and staff members. During the investigation, the investigating agency have made some enquiry with the accused relating to the crime and also found in possession of the contraband articles and they seized the same in the presence of the pancha witnesses. They also seized the cloth bag and the car used for committing the crime.

8. He further submits that the case is still under investigation. Moreover, the investigating officer is required to secure other materials in order to lay the charge sheet against the accused persons. Therefore, he contends that if the accused is supposed to be released on bail, certainly he would come in the way of the prosecution case and try to destroy the evidence and so also, it would send an adversary impact on the society as he has involved in the offence relating to NDPS Act. Hence, he contends that the accused is not deserving for bail. Therefore, on all these grounds, learned HCGP seeks for dismissal of the petition.

9. It is in this context of the contentions as taken by learned counsel for the petitioner and learned HCGP for the State, it is relevant to refer to the allegations made in the complaint. It is stated in the complaint that, the complainant on receiving credible information that on 03.03.2020, a person will come near Tavarekere bus stand on Aralikatte to sell the drugs to the customer, went to the spot along with the panchas and staff members and they found a White Hyundai Car yellow board bearing registration No.KA 01 AJ 7750 at the spot and two persons getting down from the car and one person was holding a cloth bag and they went near the Aralikatte and waiting for the customers. At that time, the complainant and other apprehended the accused and on personal search, they found 1 kg 50 grams of Hashish oil, MDMA 3.5 grams and ganja 2 kgs. They seized the said items. They also seized white car and one cloth bag. They drew panchanama and arrested the accused persons. Subsequent to the registration of crime against the accused, that the investigating officer has taken up a case for investigation. The case is still under investigation. Moreover, the investigating officer has to secure the material documents and so also to record the statement of witnesses in order to lay the charge sheet against the accused persons. The contraband articles which were seized from the possession of the accused requires to be tested before the Trial Court only after laying the charge sheet. Moreover, at this stage, it cannot be said specific quantity of the said contraband articles of ganja and ganja oil which were found in the possession of the accused. The learned HCGP has stated about the involvement of this accused along with other accused who were trying to sell the contraband articles at the scene of offence and were waiting for customers. Therefore, at this stage, it does not require any detailed discussion to consider the bail petition. The report made by the investigating officer in respect of the case in Crime No.30 of 2020, specifically states that the accused is not required for the investigating agency for the purpose of investigation. This aspect has been emphasized by the learned Counsel for the petitioner for consideration of bail petition filed by the accused in addition to the grounds urged in this petition. However, the petitioner is said to be abode of State of Kerala. Moreover, he is involved in the alleged crime and was in possession of the contraband articles as stated in the FIR. Therefore, the apprehension expressed by the learned HCGP that if this petitioner/accused No.1 is supposed to be released on bail, certainly he would come in the way of prosecution case and destroy the evidence, it could be curtailed by imposing certain suitable conditions to safeguard the interest of the prosecution.

10. For the aforesaid reasons as well as under the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that petitioner/accused No.1 is deserving for bail. Accordingly, I proceed to pass the following:

ORDER

The petition filed by the petitioner/Accused No.1 under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is h

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

ereby allowed, subject to the following conditions: i) Petitioner/Accused No.1 shall execute a bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-, with a likesum surety to the satisfaction of the Court of VI Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Bengaluru City, relating to Crime No.30 of 2020 of Suddaguntepalya Police Station; ii) Petitioner/Accused No.1 shall not tamper or hamper with the case of prosecution witnesses; iii) Petitioner/Accused No.1 shall co-operate with the investigating officer during the investigation; iv) Petitioner/Accused No.1 shall mark his attendance once in a month in first week on Sunday as per the English monthly calendar in between 10.00 a.m. and 5.00 p.m before the concerned SHO in Crime No.30 of 2020, for a period of six months; v) Petitioner/Accused No.1 shall not indulge in any criminal activities, henceforth. If Petitioner/Accused No.1 violates any of the above conditions, the bail order shall automatically stands ceased.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

11-09-2020 M/s. Unicorn Maritimes (India) Private Limited., Represented by its Director Arul Augustin Joseph Chennai Versus Valency Internation Trading Pvt Limited., Represented by its Director & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
08-09-2020 John Joseph, Advocate, Chairman Voters Alliance, Ernakulam Versus State of Kerala, Represented by Secretary, Department of Local Self Government, Thiruvananthapuram & Others High Court of Kerala
08-09-2020 Dr. Joseph Freeman Motha & Another Versus Sudha Vijayan & Another High Court of Kerala
19-08-2020 Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., New Delhi Versus Adv. Shiji Joseph & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
14-08-2020 Jollyamma Joseph Versus State of Kerala Represented by The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala High Court of Kerala
21-07-2020 G. Bhagavat Singh Versus Manoj Joseph & Others High Court of Kerala
21-07-2020 Shoby Joseph & Others Versus State of Kerala, Represented by The Superintendent of Police, Crime No. 367 of 2019 of CB, Central Unit-IV, Represented by The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam & Another High Court of Kerala
15-07-2020 Manu Joseph Versus State of Kerala, Represented by The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam & Another High Court of Kerala
13-07-2020 Dr. K.J. Joseph & Others Versus The Mattathur Grama Panchayath, Thrissur, Rep. by Its Secretary & Others High Court of Kerala
30-06-2020 Bilsy Joseph, now residing at 3743, Falkner Drive, United States of America, Represented by her Power of Attorney holder (Mother), Rosamma Joseph, Kottayam Versus Registrar of Births & Deaths, Changanassery Muncipality, Kottayam & Others High Court of Kerala
19-06-2020 M/s. Virgo Industries (Engineers) Pvt Ltd., Rep. By its Director Reethamma Joseph & Another Versus M/s. Venturetech Solutions Pvt Ltd., Rep. By its Director N. Mal Reddy High Court of Judicature at Madras
29-05-2020 Joe Joseph Versus The State of Kerala, Represented by The Principal Secretary To Government, Higher Education Department, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram & Others High Court of Kerala
04-05-2020 Jobin Joseph Versus Uma Thomas & Another High Court of Kerala
30-04-2020 United Nurses Association, Through Its State President Shoby Joseph, Thrissur Versus Union Of India, Represented By The Secretary, New Delhi & Another High Court of Kerala
28-04-2020 Kane Joseph Manoah Versus The Queen Court of Appeal of New Zealand
20-03-2020 Jollyamma Joseph @ Jolly Versus The State of Kerala Represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam & Another High Court of Kerala
17-03-2020 K.T. Joseph & Another Versus Revenue Divisional Officer, Kottayam & Others High Court of Kerala
11-03-2020 Shyla @ Shymol Kamalasanan & Another Versus Joseph High Court of Kerala
11-03-2020 M/s. Logical Developers Private Limited, New Delhi, Represented by Its Authorized Signatory Jose Joseph, Kochi & Another Versus M/s. Muthoot Mini Financiers Private Limited, Pathanamthitta, Represented by Its Chairman & Managing Director Roy M. Mathew & Others High Court of Kerala
10-03-2020 Shail Jiju Versus Biju Joseph & Another High Court of Kerala
09-03-2020 V.Y. Thomas @ Sajimon Versus V.Y. Joseph High Court of Kerala
03-03-2020 Jet Airways (India) Ltd., represented by its Airport Manager Versus Thomas Joseph Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
28-02-2020 Sabu Joseph Versus Kerala State Election Commission, Represented by Its Secretary, State Election Commission Office, Thiruvananthapuram & Another High Court of Kerala
20-02-2020 General Manager, Hmt Machine Tools Ltd., Through Its Deputy General Manager (Hr) Shri Joseph Pradeep Keshri Minz, Ajmer (Raj) & Others Versus Controlling Authority, Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 & Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Ajmer (Raj) & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
20-02-2020 Lalu Joseph Versus The State of Kerala, Represented by The Public Proseucutor, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam for The Circle Inspector of Police, Nilambur High Court of Kerala
19-02-2020 Marthoma Syrian Church, Represented by Most Rev. Dr. Joseph, Marthoma Metropolitan, Thiruvalla & Others Versus Jessie Thampi (Died) & Others High Court of Kerala
19-02-2020 Joy Joseph Versus Desai Homes represented by V.R. Desai & Another Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
13-02-2020 E. Arputhadhas Versus E. Joseph (Died) & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
10-02-2020 Tonymon Joseph Versus General Manager, Southern Railway, Chennai & Others High Court of Kerala
31-01-2020 Kolli Venkata Mohana Rao & Another Versus Joseph Christian Krishnaraj (died) & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
29-01-2020 J. Xavier Versus Joseph High Court of Judicature at Madras
20-01-2020 K. John & Others Versus John Joseph & Others High Court of Kerala
14-01-2020 Joseph Yemmiganoor @ Kadakoti Versus State, Through Police Inspector & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
19-12-2019 Joseph Tajet Versus State of Kerala Represented by Chief Secretary To Government, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram High Court of Kerala
12-12-2019 Nobby M. George, Changanassery Tlauk, Rep. by Power of Attorney holder his mother Alice George, Changanassery Versus Jossy Joseph, Kuttanad Taluk, Now Staying With Her Sister Raji Joseph, Erskine Court, Nanuet 10954, New York, USA High Court of Kerala
10-12-2019 Joseph Charles & Others Versus State, Rep. by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station-South, Madurai & Another Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
06-12-2019 P.T. Joseph, Proprietor, Cheryl Enterprises, Elamakkara, Ernakulam Versus Kabeer Husain Minanna & Others High Court of Kerala
28-11-2019 Joseph Mathai @ Jose Versus State of Kerala, Thiruvampady Police Station, Crime No.199/07 High Court of Kerala
28-11-2019 M. Jeyamary Versus M. Joseph Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
18-11-2019 Deepa Rachal George Versus Sherin Annie Joseph & Others High Court of Kerala
14-11-2019 Rev. Fr. L. Joseph Paulraj Versus St. Mary's Cathedral Trust Rep. by its Secretary-cum-Treasurer Rev. Fr. Devaraj & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
11-11-2019 Joseph Antony Gerard Versus J.L. Malarvizhi High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-10-2019 IC 29547 L Bobby Joseph Versus Union of India & Others Supreme Court of India
26-09-2019 Priya Versus Biju Joseph High Court of Kerala
19-09-2019 M.M. Joseph Versus Yoonus & Others High Court of Kerala
19-09-2019 M/s. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., Egmore, Chennai, Represented by Chief Manager, Stephen Joseph, Kochi Versus Joseph Mohanan & Another High Court of Kerala
17-09-2019 Alwin Joseph Versus The Superintendent of Police, Erode & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-09-2019 Sushil Joseph Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Labour-II (Authority under the Payment of Wages Act) Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-08-2019 Paul Joseph Shirole & Another Versus The State of Maharashtra High Court of Judicature at Bombay
26-08-2019 B.S. Shabana Versus Kevin Joseph Selvadoray High Court of Karnataka
22-08-2019 State of Kerala, Represented by deputy Commissioner of State Tax (Law), State Goods & Service Tax Department, Ernakulam Versus Raphel T. Joseph High Court of Kerala
21-08-2019 M/s Popular Vehicles & Services Ltd., V.H. Kammath Towers, Kadathy, Muvattupuzha Versus James K. Joseph & Another Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
09-08-2019 Charly Joseph Versus State of Kerala, Represented by The Secretary, Industries Department, Thiruvananthapuram & Others High Court of Kerala
09-08-2019 Joseph Thomas @ Jose & Others Versus State of Kerala, Represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam High Court of Kerala
30-07-2019 Sijo Joseph Versus The Transport Commissioner, Vazhuthacaud, Thiruvananthapuram & Others High Court of Kerala
29-07-2019 Geemol Joseph, Represented by her Power of Attorney holder Losan Joseph Versus Kousthabhan & Another High Court of Kerala
19-06-2019 Joseph Thomas @ Thampi Kannanthanam & Others Versus Molly George @ Molamma High Court of Kerala
14-06-2019 C. Joseph Versus The District Collector, Coimbatore & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
14-06-2019 V.M. Joseph Versus Kadanad Grama Panchayath, Represented by Its Secretary, Kottayam & Others High Court of Kerala
11-06-2019 Clarence Joseph Bhengra Versus State of Jharkhand High Court of Jharkhand
07-06-2019 L'Oratoire Saint-Joseph du Mont-Royal Versus J.J Supreme Court of Canada
30-05-2019 D.B. Jatti & Another Versus Kambam Sudhir Joseph Reddy & Another High Court of Karnataka
30-05-2019 Thresiamma Manshoven Versus Manshoven Jacques Joseph High Court of Kerala
29-05-2019 Asha, Rep. by the Power of Attorney Holder Jonh D'cruz Versus P.K. Joseph & Another High Court of Kerala
02-05-2019 Lydia Agnes Rodrigues (Since deceased) through her legal heirs & Others Versus Joseph Anthony D'Cunha & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
26-04-2019 Viji Joseph & Another Versus P. Chander & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
25-04-2019 Management of St. Joseph of Cluny Montessori School, Pondicherry Versus The Director of School Education, Government of Pondicherry & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
09-04-2019 Joseph Santhosh Kottarathil Alexander & Others Versus The Superintendent of Customs (Aiu), Cochin International Airport, Nedumbassery, Kochi & Others High Court of Kerala
29-03-2019 Joseph Peter & Others Versus Elizabath Manuel & Others High Court of Kerala
25-03-2019 Commissioner, West Arni Panchayat Union, Thiruvannamalai Versus St. Joseph Social Welfare Centre, Rep by Brother & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
14-03-2019 Joseph Saldhana Versus State of Karnataka, Represented by the Deputy Commissioner & Others High Court of Karnataka
08-03-2019 K.A. Joseph Versus The District Collector, Kottayam & Others High Court of Kerala
07-03-2019 Sebastian Joseph Versus The Governor, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai Others High Court of Kerala
06-03-2019 James Joseph Murren as Trustee of the James J Murren Spendthrift Trust & Daniel Lee Versus Glenn Schaeffer Court of Appeal of New Zealand
27-02-2019 Tushar Versus Internal Complaints Committee Christ University, Rep. by its Presiding Officer Dr. Mayamma Joseph & Others High Court of Karnataka
22-02-2019 Shali Joseph & Another Versus S.K. Sasikumar High Court of Kerala
19-02-2019 P.B. Dineshan Pillai Versus Joseph @ Jose High Court of Kerala
18-02-2019 Joseph Versus State of Karnataka & Others High Court of Karnataka
13-02-2019 HDB Financial Services Limited, Ernakulam, Represented by Its Legal Officer (Kerala) & Authorized Officer, A.C. Pratheesh Versus M/s. Kings Baker Private Limited, Kottayam, Represented by Its Proprietor, Tom.P. Joseph & Others High Court of Kerala
08-02-2019 Malabar Granites, Palakkad, Represented by Its Managing Partner, M.K. Joseph Versus The Secretary , Koppam Grama Panchayat, Palakkad & Others High Court of Kerala
31-01-2019 Sami Labs Limited Versus M.V. Joseph High Court of Karnataka
29-01-2019 P. Santhosh Joseph & Another Versus The Principal Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration & Water Supply Dept., Chennai & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
24-01-2019 Malabar Granites, Represented by Its Managing Partner, M.K. Joseph Versus The Secretary, Koppam Grama Panchayat & Others High Court of Kerala
24-01-2019 Thomas Joseph Versus Caculo Automotive Pvt. Ltd. & Another Goa State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Panaji
24-01-2019 The Commercial Tax Officer, Changanassery & Others Versus M/s. Hotel Breezeland Ltd., Changanassery, Represented by Its Managing Director Joseph Cherian & Another High Court of Kerala
23-01-2019 M/s. Sanjose Parish Hospital, Represented by its Director, Rev. Fr. Joseph (Noby) Ambookan & Others Versus The Commercial Tax Officer, Chavakkad, Thrissur & Others High Court of Kerala
22-01-2019 Joseph A. Kennedy Versus Bremerton School District (2019) Supreme Court of United States
22-01-2019 Joseph A. Kennedy Versus Bremerton School District(2019) Supreme Court of United States
18-01-2019 M/s. Sanjose Parish Hospital, Thrissur, Represented by Its Director, Rev. Fr. Joseph (Noby) Ambookan & Others Versus The Commercial Tax Officer, Thrissur & Others High Court of Kerala
14-01-2019 Joseph Velivil Versus Nucleus Premium Properties Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Managing Director Nishad N.P, Ventura Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
11-01-2019 Suo Motu, K. Ani Joseph & Others Versus State of Kerala & Another High Court of Kerala
11-01-2019 Joseph George & Another Versus State of Kerala, Represented by The Chief Secretary, State Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram & Others High Court of Kerala
03-01-2019 The Assistant General Manager & Authorized Officer, Union Bank of India Consortium, Ernakulam Main Branch Versus The Dewa Investors Association, Ernakulam, Represented By Its President Prince Joseph & Others High Court of Kerala
19-12-2018 The Refugee Appeal Board of South Africa & Others Versus Paul Joseph Mutombo Mukungubila Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa
14-12-2018 Suriyur Vivasayigal Pathukappu Sangam, Rep. by its President, T. Ramaraj, Trichy Versus LA Bottlers Private Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director, Joseph Francis, Thiruchirappalli & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
13-12-2018 Stella Joseph & Another Versus The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Bengaluru & Others High Court of Kerala
13-12-2018 K.A. Joseph, Kannur District & Another Versus South Indian Bank Ltd, Kannur & Another Debts Recovery Tribunal Ernakulam
29-11-2018 Alphonsa Joseph and Others V/S Anand Joseph High Court of Kerala Ernakulam Bench
30-10-2018 Tomy Joseph Versus Smitha Tomy High Court of Kerala
29-10-2018 G. Bhagavat Singh Versus Manoj Joseph & Others High Court of Kerala