At, Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Chennai
By, HONOURABLE THIRU JUSTICE R. REGUPATHI
By, THIRU A.K. ANNAMALAI
By, MEMBER JUDICIAL & HONOURABLE THIRU S. SAMBANDAM
By, MEMBER II
For the Petitioner : M/s. Ram & Veera, Advocates. For the Respondent : M/s. M.B. Gopalan, Advocate.
(This petition is preferred by the petitioner, praying to set aside the order of District Forum in CMP No.555/2010 in CCSr.831/2010 dt.22.09.2011.
This petition coming before us for hearing finally today. Upon hearing the arguments of the counsel on bothsides, this commission made the following order.)
JUSTICE R. REGUPATHI J, PRESIDENT. (Open court)
1. Heard. Revision Petitioner has filed a petition under Sec.24(A)(1), to condone the delay of 233 days in filing the complaint, before the District Forum, which was dismissed by the District Forum, on merits. Against that order, the Revision Petitioner has come forward with this petition, and contended that the delay was properly explained in the petition, which was not considered by the District Forum, which was opposed vehemently.
2. On perusal of the order of the District Forum, and based upon the circumstances as stated by the petitioner, we are of the considered opinion that this petition shall be allowed, and the delay shall be condoned, but on imposing certain condition.
3. In the result, the Revision Petition is allowed, on condition that the petitioner shall pay a sum of RS.2000/- as cost to the respondent/ opposite party, on or before 11.6.2012, failing whic
Please Login To View The Full Judgment!
h the Revision shall stand dismissed. On compliance, the District Forum is directed to take the complaint on file, if it is otherwise in order.