w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Interglobe Aviation Limited v/s Union of India, Thr. Secretary, Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change Secretary & Others

    Civil Appeal Nos. 79-81 of 2019

    Decided On, 02 July 2019

    At, Supreme Court of India

    By, THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD & THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE

    For the Appellant: Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Advocate, Saurabh Kirpal, Jasmeet Singh, AOR, Mrinal Ojha, Ishaan Chhaya, Rashi Goswami, Rusheet Saluja, Saif Ali, Advocates. For the Respondents: ANS Nadkarni, ASG, Chinmayee, Salvador Santosh Rebello, Swati Ghildiyal, B.V. Balaram Das, AOR, Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR, Kiran Kumar Patra, AOR, U.A. Rana, M/s. Gagrat & Co, AOR, Sanjay Pal, Amrendra Kumar Mehta, AOR, Sanjay Kumar Dubey, AOR, Shuchi Singh, Krishna Kant Dubey, Advocates.



Judgment Text


1. During the course of the hearing, a counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Union of India in the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare dealing with the issue as to whether disinfection of aircraft through the process of fumigation should be permitted. That is the main issue which has been raised in the civil appeals.

2. The affidavit makes a reference to the guidelines of the World Health Organisation ("WHO") as well as to the provisions contained in the Aircraft (Public Health) Rules 1954.

3. Having regard to the nature of the issues raised, particularly in the context of public health, it would be appropriate if the Union government considers the feasibility of setting up a high powered Committee consisting of experts in the field. The Committee will, upon due assessment of the benefits and hazards involved, take a considered decision. Since the matter essentially pertains to an issue of policy, we are of the view that such an exercise should be carried out by the Union government in the first instance. This would also apprise the court of the position of the Union government.

4. Mr. ANS Nadkarni, learned Additional Solicitor General has informed the Court that the Union government is not averse to following this course of action so that a policy decision can be arrived at.

5. Ms. Meenakshi Arora, learned Senior Counsel and Mr. Saurabh Kirpal, learned counsel representing the appellants have accepted this action, as appropriate.

6. We, accordingly, adjourn t

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

he hearing of the civil appeals till 16 July 2019, when the Court will be apprised of the decision of the Union government in this regard. List on 16 July 2019.
O R