w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



I.T.C. Limited v/s Deepak Garments


Company & Directors' Information:- D R GARMENTS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101GJ2005PTC046010

Company & Directors' Information:- R. R. GARMENTS LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51900MH1995PLC095544

Company & Directors' Information:- S G GARMENTS LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101WB2004PLC098193

Company & Directors' Information:- K K P GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65921TZ1994PTC005334

Company & Directors' Information:- B K GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2001PTC109850

Company & Directors' Information:- N K GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2000PTC107093

Company & Directors' Information:- K. D. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18109WB2005PTC101896

Company & Directors' Information:- G AND A GARMENTS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U18101PB1995PTC016121

Company & Directors' Information:- V H GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U52322MH2008PTC181066

Company & Directors' Information:- S. S. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL1996PTC083315

Company & Directors' Information:- G. M. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18109DL2006PTC152683

Company & Directors' Information:- D AND D GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1975PTC007923

Company & Directors' Information:- J S GARMENTS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74900WB2009PTC135262

Company & Directors' Information:- K. B . GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18109WB2011PTC166954

Company & Directors' Information:- A K GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17120DL2015PTC282847

Company & Directors' Information:- D P GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U18101DL2004PTC129479

Company & Directors' Information:- V S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC143084

Company & Directors' Information:- P AND P GARMENTS PVT LTD [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC143556

Company & Directors' Information:- V S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101HR2005PTC068124

Company & Directors' Information:- L. H. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U17121KA2011PTC060761

Company & Directors' Information:- K R GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U17111WB1998PTC087046

Company & Directors' Information:- T & A GARMENTS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U52321TN1993PTC025318

Company & Directors' Information:- P. S. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18204DL2007PTC164238

Company & Directors' Information:- S. A. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17121DL2007PTC165007

Company & Directors' Information:- T S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51494DL1996PTC076668

Company & Directors' Information:- GARMENTS INDIA PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U51909GJ1979PTC003310

Company & Directors' Information:- K. S. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2007PTC164404

Company & Directors' Information:- B G GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL2005PTC142488

Company & Directors' Information:- S P GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U18101DL2003PTC120709

Company & Directors' Information:- P N GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51311DL2004PTC127524

Company & Directors' Information:- DEEPAK GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101MH2007PTC176971

Company & Directors' Information:- S T GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18109DL2015PTC277043

Company & Directors' Information:- P L GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17120DL2013PTC248417

Company & Directors' Information:- M. K. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17291DL2007PTC164395

Company & Directors' Information:- R A GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Converted to LLP and Dissolved] CIN = U18101DL2003PTC123385

Company & Directors' Information:- C S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC134787

Company & Directors' Information:- B L GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC136912

Company & Directors' Information:- B D S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC137898

Company & Directors' Information:- T G GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC143392

Company & Directors' Information:- G P S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED. [Active] CIN = U18101DL2006PTC149330

Company & Directors' Information:- G P GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2007PTC161067

Company & Directors' Information:- I B GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909DL2013PTC257044

Company & Directors' Information:- G P S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED. [Active] CIN = U74110DL2006PTC149330

Company & Directors' Information:- A G GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51300DL2013PTC257609

Company & Directors' Information:- V R V GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51311DL2008PTC182256

Company & Directors' Information:- M V GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74899HR2005PTC141797

Company & Directors' Information:- A AND R GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U17120HR2013PTC049037

Company & Directors' Information:- V K GARMENTS PRIVATE LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U18101DL1981PTC012410

Company & Directors' Information:- A S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17212CH1992PTC012350

Company & Directors' Information:- V R GARMENTS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U18101CH1991PTC011345

Company & Directors' Information:- S B GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51311DL2005PTC141954

    CS(OS) Appeal No. 135 of 2004

    Decided On, 18 December 2008

    At, High Court of Delhi

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

    For the Appearing Parties: Sushant Singh, Advocate.



Judgment Text

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.


(1) THE plaintiff engaged inter-alia in the business of branded apparel under the trademark WILLS SPORT and JOHN PLAYERS instituted this suit for permanent injunction against four defendants for restraining them from dealing in garments bearing the trademark WILLS SPORT and JOHN PLAYERS and ITC, in combination or individually and for the ancillary reliefs of accounts, damages, delivery etc. Vide ex-parte order dated 17th February, 2004, the defendants were restrained from selling, marketing or distributing the wearing apparel with the plaintiff's trademarks and logos WILLS SPORT, JOHN PLAYERS and ITC or any other trademark or logo deceptively similar to that of the plaintiff's. The said order was made absolute during the pendency of the suit, vide order dated 17th January, 2007. The defendants No. 1,2and4 on being served with the summons of the suit separately filed their written statements. The defendant No. 3, however, failed to appear in spite of service and was vide order dated 29th March, 2006 proceeded against ex-parte. The plaintiff, at the time of institution of the suit, had applied for registration of trademark WILLS SPORT and JOHN PLAYERS and john PLAYER and during the pendency of the suit the said registration was granted. The plaintiff applied for amendment of the plaint to incorporate the said fact in the plaint and the application of the plaintiff for amendment was allowed on 29th March, 2006. The defendants 1,2 and 4 did not file any written statement to the amended plaint and adopted the written statements earlier filed by them, to the amended plaint also.


(2) ON the pleadings of the plaintiff and the defendants No. 1,2, and 4, on 17th january, 2007, the following issues were framed:-


"1]. Whether the plaintiff is the proprietor of the trademark and copyright in respect of WILLS SPORT, WILL SPORT LOGO, JOHN PLAYERS in respect of readymade garments, shirts, jeans, trousers, etc. " 2]. Whether the defendants are passing off their goods as that of the plaintiff" 3]. Whether the defendants are infringing the trademark and WILL SPORT and john PLAYERS of the plaintiff" 4]. Whether the defendants are infringing the logo in respect of WILL SPORT amounting to infringement of copyright of the plaintiff" 5]. Relief. "


(3) THE defendants No. 1,2 and 4 however also failed to appear thereafter and were vide order dated 15th November, 2007 also proceeded against ex-parte.


(4) THE plaintiff led ex-parte evidence by filing the affidavit by way of examination in chief of its constituted attorney Mr. Rajiv Ohri. The defendants remain ex-parte. The counsel for the plaintiff has also filed synopsis for submissions.


(5) THOUGH issues as aforesaid were framed when the defendants No. 1,2 and 4 were contesting the suit but they also having been proceeded against ex-parte, the issues need not be dealt with separately.


(6) THE witness of the plaintiff has proved as Exhibit P1, the registration certificates showing the plaintiff as the registered proprietor of the device wills SPORT with "w", however, without any right to the exclusive use of letter "w" or the word SPORT, in relation to clothing, footwear, headgear for sale in India and for export and also in relation to leather goods, accessories, animal skins etc. of the word JOHN PLAYER for bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use etc. of the device WILLS SPORT, with "w" for sporting equipment, games play things, supporting articles, decorations etc. as well as for clothing, footwear, headgear for sale in India and for export of the device john PLAYER for sporting equipment, games, gymnastics, without any right to the exclusive use of the PLAYERS. It, thus, stands established that the plaintiff is the registered proprietor of WILLS SPORT, WILLS SPORTS LOGO and JOHN PLAYERS.


(7) THE plaintiff had approached this court on learning of the sale of counterfeit WILLS SPORT and JOHN PLAYERS shirt, jeans, trousers and other clothing at the premises owned by the defendants. Though, it was the case in the plaint that the plaintiff through a notary public had purchased the goods bearing infringing trademark from the defendants but the said public notary was not examined by the plaintiff. It was further the case of the plaintiff that the inquiries of the plaintiff had revealed that the defendant No. 1 M/s Deepak garments functioning from 90 and 157, Sarojini Nagar Market, New Delhi was the manufacturer and the fabricator of the infringing goods, the said goods were being sold through the defendant No. 2 M/s Guru Nanak Trading Co. at shop No. 82, sarojini Nagar Market, New Delhi, and the defendant No. 3 M/s Mini Fashion Street at 199 Sarojini Nagar Market and the defendant No. 4 M/s Shanker Garments at Shop no. 77-A, Sarojini Nagar Market, New Delhi. It was also the case of the plaintiff that the defendant No. 1 was also selling the infringing goods from its shop in the market. It was on these pleas that the four defendants were joined in this suit. That the defendant No. 1 in its written statement filed by Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, S/o Mr. Abdh Bihari Gupta r/o 74/2, New Law Shashtri Nagar, delhi (affidavit is attached to written statement of defendant No. 2) inter-alia stated that there was no firm by the name of M/s Deepak Garments at shop No. 90 and averred that he was carrying on business of Dry Cleaning in the name and style of M/s Blue Bird Dry Cleaners at shop No. 90, Sarojini Nagar Market, New Delhi. He denied the rest of the contents of the plaint. The defendant No. 2 M/s guru Nanak Trading Co. in its written statement filed through Mr. Iqbal Singh s/o Mr. Mohinder Singh, R/o Flat No. 148, Sarojini Nagar Market, New Delhi as sole proprietor (affidavit attached to written statement of defendant No. 1)stated that no firm by the name of Guru Nanak Trading Co. exists at shop No. 82, sarojini Nagar Market, New Delhi and stated that in fact a tent house in the name and style of M/s Guru Nanak Tent House under the proprietorship of Mr. Iqbal Singh aforesaid was being run from shop No. 82. He further pleaded that he had given a part of the said shop No. 82 on rent to one Mr. Ajay Kumar S/o Late Mr. Kishori Lal R/o G-82/101a, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi who was conducting his business of selling garments from the said shop. The said Mr. Iqbal Singh also denied the rest of the contents of the plaint. The defendant No. 4 M/s Shankar garments in its written statement filed through Mr. Dharmender Kumar S/o Mr. Sumar Mal R/o 11/15, 3rd Floor, West Patel Nagar, Delhi as sole proprietor denied the contents of the plaint and denied having dealt with the trademark/device aforesaid of the plaintiff.


(8) THE sole witness of the plaintiff in his deposition reiterated the contents of the plaint with respect to the defendants and proved nothing further. It is, however, significant that the plaintiff had along with the suit filed an application for appointment of two local commissioners to visit the premises of defendant No. 1 M/s Deepak Garments at 90 and 157, Sarojini Nagar market and the premises of the defendant No. 2 M/s Guru Nanak Trading Co. at shop no. 82, Sarojini Nagar Market. This court vide ex-parte order dated 17th february, 2004 appointed the local commissioners to visit the aforesaid premises and to make an inventory of the goods carrying the infringing trademarks and logo.


(9) THE local commissioner appointed to visit the premises of the defendant no. 1 M/s Deepak Garments at 90and157, Sarojini Nagar, New Delhi filed a report stating the infringing goods were found only in shop No. 90 but not in shop no. 157. The local commissioner also mentioned having met one Mr. Ajay Kumar, an employee in the said shop No. 90 and an employee Mr. Kamal at shop No. 157.


(10) THE local commissioner appointed to visit the premises of the defendant no. 2 M/s Guru Nanak Trading Co. at shop No. 82 reported that on reaching the shop, one Mr. Ajay who introduced himself as an employee was met in the shop; the said Mr. Ajay had called Mr. Iqbal Singh described as the owner of the business; the said Mr. Iqbal Singh co-operated and the local commissioner found infringing goods which were left in the superdari of the said Mr. Iqbal Singh only.


(11) THOUGH no objections to the aforesaid reports of the local commissioner have been filed but the defendant No. 2 M/s Guru Nanak Trading Co. in its written statement stated that he had described himself to the local commission as the owner of the building and not as the owner of the business and the local commissioner had forced him to sign the superdarinama. The defendant No. 1 in its written statement, however, did not deal with the visit of the local commissioner.


(12) FROM the aforesaid reports of the local commissioner, which there is no reason to doubt, especially in the face of the defendants having neither filed any objections thereto nor contested the same, show that at least the aforesaid sh. Iqbal Singh carrying on business at 82, Sarojini Nagar Market, New Delhi and m/s Deepak Garments carrying on business at 90, Sarojini Nagar Market were indulging in the activities complained by the plaintiff and with respect to which the suit for injunction has been filed. The presence of the same person Mr. Ajay at the time of visit by the local commissioners to both the premises also establish the common connection at least between the defendants No. 1 and 2. The plaintiff has thus become entitled to the decree for injunction against the defendants No. 1 and 2.


(13) AS far as the defendants No. 3 and 4 also are concerned, in view of the unrebutted statement of the witness of the plaintiff, the plaintiff has become entitled to injunction against them also. I may record that the witness of the plaintiff has proved as Exhibit P-2, the photographs of the plaintiff's products with the trademark and device aforesaid of the plaintiff and as Exhibit P-4 the photographs of the infringing products. From the perusal thereof it is evident that the trademark, logo, trade dress of the plaintiff is being counterfeited by the defendants. The witness of the plaintiff has also purported to prove as exhibit P-3 the affidavit of one Mr. Rakesh Chhabra of having purchased the infringing goods from the defendant No. 3 at 199, Sarojini Nagar Market, New Delhi but the deponent of the affidavit having not been examined, I do not consider the said document to have been proved in accordance with law.


(14) AS far as the relief of damages is concerned, for no explicable reason the plaintiff while applying for appointment of local commissioner did not apply for commissioner to be appointed with respect to the premises of the defendants no. 3 and 4. As aforesaid, the witness of the plaintiff has also save to his bare statement not led any evidence to show the constitution of the defendants no. 3and4 nor expanded the case as set out in the plaint or in any further. I, therefore, do not consider the plaintiff to have made out any case for recovery of any damages from the defendants No. 3 and 4. However, as far as the defendant no. 2 is concerned, though he has in his written statement purported to explain the infringing goods found in his shop by the local commission by pleading that the business therein was being carried out by his tenant, neither has the said stand been proved nor is it believable. The plaintiff has thus become entitled to the relief of the damages against said Mr. Iqbal Singh, proprietor of defendant No. 2. Similarly the local commissioner visiting the premises No. 90, sarojini Nagar Market, New Delhi also found the infringing goods. The plaintiff had not disclosed the constitution of M/s Deepak Garments. However, Mr. Vinod kumar Gupta, who has filed the written statement on behalf of the defendant No. 1 and who has claimed to be carrying on business at 90, Sarojini Nagar Market, New Delhi is found to have indulged in infringing goods, even though he has denied carrying on business in the name and style of Deepak Garments and has claimed to be carrying on business in the name of Blue Bird Dry Cleaners in the said premises.


(15) THE counsel for the plaintiff has relied upon Microsoft Corporation Vs. Yogesh Papat 2005 (30) PTC 245 (Del) where this court has held that the plaintiff would be entitled to damages for the reason that it would be futile to direct the defendants to render accounts for the reason of the defendants carrying on business surreptitiously. Similarly, in Time Incorporated Vs. Lokesh

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

Srivastava 2005 (30) PTC 3 (Del) also it was held that wherein infringement is found, punitive damages should follow to discourage such law breakers. (16) AS aforesaid, the goods seized by the local commissioner, were as directed given on Superdari to Mr. Iqbal Singh and Mr. Ajay Kumar. The plaintiff is permitted to take the requisite steps for taking the said goods from the superdar and for destruction of the same. (17) CONSIDERING the nature of the goods, in the present case namely garments which normally in the markets such as the Sarojini Nagar are sold in the region rs. 300 to 500/-, and further since the infringement is stated to have continued for a short period, I deem it appropriate to award plaintiff punitive damages against the aforesaid Mr. Iqbal Singh and Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta respectively in the sums of Rs. 1 lac each. (18) THE suit of the plaintiff is thus decreed for permanent injunction in terms of para 46 (i) to (iii) of the plaint. A decree for recovery of damages in the sum of Rs. 1 lac each is also passed against the aforesaid Mr. Iqbal Singh believed to be carrying on business in name and style of defendant No. 2 and Mr vinod Kumar Gupta believed to be carrying on business in the name and style of defendant No. 1. The plaintiff shall also be entitled to proportionate costs from the defendants. Decree sheet be prepared.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

13-01-2020 Union of India rep. By its Enforcement Officer Enforcement Directorate Chennai Versus M/s. Raiments & Garments International, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
03-01-2020 The General Manager, Aleppy Parcel Service, Alappuzha Versus Anil Kumar V., Managing Partner, Wetex Garments, Poovattuparamba, Kozhikode Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
22-11-2019 The Management Scotts Garments Limited, Trippur Versus The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Coimbatore & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
14-10-2019 M/s. PJS Knit Garments, Rep.by its Partner, P. Sugansaran & Another Versus The Authorised Officer, Bank of Baroda, Tirupur Main Branch, Tirupur High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-08-2019 M/s. Indo Skins Garments Private Limited, Represented by its Managing Director, N. Thiagarajan, Chennai Versus The Presiding Officer, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
24-07-2019 The Officer In Charge, Sub-Regional Provident Fund Office & Another Versus M/s Godavari Garments Limited Supreme Court of India
05-04-2019 The District Collector, Kanchipuram Versus M/s. Gupta Garments, Rep. by its Authorized Signatory Anil Gupta & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-04-2019 M/s. Ginni Garments & Another Versus M/s. Sethi Garments & Others High Court of Punjab and Haryana
04-04-2019 Ginni Garments and Others V/S Sethi Garments and Others. In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
13-03-2019 The Senior Divisional Mechanical Engineer, Southern Railway, Salem Division & Others Versus M/s. Premier Garments Processing, Rep. by its Proprietor Ibrahim Sha, Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
21-12-2018 Batra Garments Pvt. Ltd. Versus New India Assurance Co. Ltd. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
21-12-2018 Goodluck Garments Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & Cus., Surat-II High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
24-09-2018 M/s. Premier Garments Processing, Rep. by its Proprietor, Ibrahim Sha, Chennai Versus The Divisional Railway Manager, Salem & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
24-07-2018 Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd., (Now ECGC Limited), Chennai & Another Versus Zoro Garments Private Ltd., Rep.by its Managing Director, N.F. Mogrella High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-07-2018 M/s. Rasathe Garments, Rep by its Partner, Virudhunagar Versus The Commercial Tax Officer-I, Virudhunagar High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-07-2018 Bord for Industrial & Financial Reconstruction (B.I.F.R.) Versus Coromandel Garments Ltd. & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
04-04-2018 M/s. Sri Rengas Avitta Garments, Represented by its Partner, R. Rajaram & Another Versus R. Indira High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-04-2018 Kandukuri Garments Versus Inspector of Legal Metrology High Court of Karnataka
02-01-2018 A. Velumurugan Versus M/s. Sree Shiva Sakthi Garments, Represented by its Partner Venkatachalam, Tiruppur High Court of Judicature at Madras
26-07-2017 Creative Garments Pvt. Ltd V/S C.C.E. & S.T. Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal West Zonal Bench At Ahmedabad
10-02-2017 The Management of Foundation Garments Pvt. Ltd. Represented by its Managing Director ?Divine Grace? Versus Government of Tamil Nadu Labour & Employment (A1) Department, Represented by its Principal Secretary High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-01-2017 R.K. Rajkumar Proprietor M/s. Koghima Garments Versus The Registrar Debts Recovery Tribunal - III Spencer Towers Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
17-01-2017 Kitex Garments Ltd., represented by its Managing Director-Sabu M. Jacob Versus State of Kerala, represented by Principal Secretary To Government, Taxes (H) Department & Another High Court of Kerala
02-01-2017 Sonal Garments V/S Commr. of Cus., Seaport (Import), Chennai Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal South Zonal Bench At Chennai
15-09-2016 M/s. Rasathe Garments Versus The Commercial Tax Officer-I (FAC) Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
02-09-2016 Carol Garments & Another Versus The Joint Director General of Foreign Trade, Coimbatore & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
21-06-2016 M/s. Oxygen the Digital Shop, Pulimoottil Arcade, Kottayam & Another Versus Namadevan.L., Anna Garments & Others Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
12-02-2016 M/s. Anjal Garments Versus Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
24-08-2015 Provident Fund Commissioner Versus M/s. Bena Garments High Court of Judicature at Bombay
05-06-2015 M/s. Triven Garments Ltd., represented by its Managing Director & Others Versus State represented by the Sub-Inspector of Police & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-02-2015 SCM Garments (P.) Ltd. Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle-III, Coimbatore Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai
18-12-2014 Nelly Garments Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
26-11-2014 Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-II Versus Ankit Garments Manufacturing Co. High Court of Delhi
07-11-2014 KMC Textiles & Garments, rep.by its Proprietor, Shaj Mohammed Versus The Chief Manager & Authorized Officer, Indian Bank, Trichy Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
24-10-2014 Board of Investment of Sri Lanka Versus Million Garments (PVT) Ltd. Supreme Court of Sri Lanka
28-08-2014 Sakthi Fashions, Manufacturers & Exporters of Fabrics and Garments, Represented by its Proprietrix Versus Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd, Represented by its General Manager Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Chennai
11-06-2014 National Insurance Company Ltd. Versus M/s. Ess Ell Garments Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Chandigarh
01-05-2014 Sri Priyaluckshmi Garments Represented by Mrs. G. Mahalakshmi, Partner & Others Versus The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
29-04-2014 Vijay Karlekar, Proprietor, M/s. New Keerthi Garments & Another Versus Karnataka State Financial Corporation & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
25-04-2014 In Re Jagadamba Garments Marketing Pvt. Ltd. & Another High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
26-02-2014 M/s. Lakshya Garments through its Proprietor Versus National Insurance Company Limited National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
25-09-2013 The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Versus M/s. Anjali Silks & Garments High Court of Karnataka
26-04-2013 M/s. Viking Garments, (A Partnership Firm) Versus United India Insurance Company Ltd. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
09-04-2013 A.J. Ramadoss Versus S. Padmavathy and N. Sankar(spouse) Om Siva Sakthi Garments National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
14-11-2012 CC&CE, Guntur Versus M/s. Kandukuri Garments (P) Ltd. Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal South Zonal Bench At Bangalore
12-10-2012 M/s. C.S. Garments & Another Versus The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Tirupur High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-08-2012 Commissioner of Income Tax Versus First Garments Manufacturing Co. India (P) Ltd High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-06-2012 M/s. Amex Garments Pvt. Ltd. Ekkattuthangal, Guindy, Rep. by Director Versus The Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
26-04-2012 M/s. Kitex Garments Ltd. Versus CC, Cochin Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal South Zonal Bench At Bangalore
23-12-2011 M/S. Shyam Garments & Others Versus State Bank Of India High Court of Delhi
09-11-2011 United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Koregaon Branch Soham Bldg., Rahimatpur Road, Koregaon, Dist. Versus M/s. Prinita Garments Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Mumbai
03-11-2011 Levi Strauss & Company Versus Nizami Garments High Court of Delhi
25-07-2011 Commissioner of Customs Versus Kitex Garments High Court of Kerala
14-07-2011 New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Versus Somesh Readymade Garments National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
12-04-2011 Anthony Garments Pvt., Ltd., Represented by A. Joseph Antony, Managing Director Versus The Commercial Tax Officer & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
15-03-2011 M/s.Gayatri Garments Represented by its proprietor Shri.B.Selvakumar Versus Smt.S.Valambal, Assistant Commissioner of Customs (Refunds) High Court of Judicature at Madras
28-02-2011 M/s. V.K.T. Rajkumar Garments Versus The Colonel, Colonel Administration for Commendent, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
22-11-2010 M/s. T.K.T. Garments Versus The Manager Sri Balaji Transport Lines & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
22-10-2010 Dandy Garments Erode Versus The Employees State Insurance Corpn & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
21-09-2010 M/s. Shyam Garments & Others V/S State Bank of India Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal At Delhi
18-08-2010 Tvl. V. Win Garments Rep. by its Proprietor Versus The Additional Deputy Commercial Tax Officer High Court of Judicature at Madras
10-08-2010 M/s. Stallion Garments Versus CC, Tuticorin Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal South Zonal Bench At Chennai
30-07-2010 M/s. Muthuraman Exports (Presently known as M/s. Perfect Stitch Garments P Ltd) Versus The Customs & Central Excise & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
07-07-2010 Vijay S/o Shamrao Bhale Versus Godavari Garments Ltd. & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
16-03-2010 Peoples Bank Versus Lokuge International Garments Ltd. Supreme Court of Sri Lanka
18-02-2010 The Management of M/s. Stallion Garments Versus The Presiding Officer Labour Court, Salem & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
10-02-2010 M/s. Fine Fit Garments Versus CC, Chennai Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal South Zonal Bench At Chennai
04-01-2010 M/s Shri Ram Garments & Another & Accessories Versus CCE, Meerut Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
07-08-2009 M/s. Bhakti Garments Versus Subhash B. Vishwakarma In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
29-06-2009 Riya Garments Private Limited v/s Pratap Rajasthan Copper Foils and Laminations Limited and Others Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal At Delhi
20-05-2009 Awadheswari Prasad Narain Singh Versus Priti Garments Patna High Court of Bihar
16-05-2009 Persian Leather Garments Versus Commissioner, Industries & Commerce & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
17-04-2009 Chander Sain & Others Versus J.B. Garments High Court of Delhi
24-02-2009 Kitex Garments Ltd., Versus State Of Kerala High Court of Kerala
05-01-2009 Futuristics Garments Pvt. Ltd. Versus Securities and Exchange Board of India SEBI Securities Exchange Board of India Securities Appellate Tribunal
23-09-2008 Southern Export Corporation A. Rajagopalan Versus Vijayseema Garments And Hosiery Private Limited High Court of Delhi
26-06-2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax Versus M/s. Ashapura Garments Pvt. Ltd. High Court of Judicature at Bombay
24-08-2007 CCE Salem Versus V.Tex Garments Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal South Zonal Bench At Chennai
09-08-2007 P. Vijaya Raghunathan Versus M/s. Green Cotton Garments rep. by its Managing Directors & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-03-2007 Garments India Exports and Another v/s Dhanalakshmi Bank Limited and Another Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal At Chennai
15-02-2007 Regional Director, E.S.I. Corporation Versus J.S. Garments High Court of Judicature at Bombay
23-01-2007 Elegant Garments Versus Regional Provident Fund Commissioner High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-12-2006 (1) In Re : Rbr Knit Process Private Limited; (2) In Re :Rbr Clothings Private Limited; (3) In Re : Rbr Garments Private Limited High Court of Judicature at Madras
30-10-2006 Angel Garments Limited Versus DIT (International Taxation)Chennai Authority For Advance Rulings Income Tax New Delhi
26-10-2006 Kerala Textile and Garments Dealer Welfare Association and Another Versus The State of Kerale High Court of Kerala
16-03-2006 La Chemise Lacoste & Another Versus R.H. Garments & Others High Court of Delhi
14-03-2006 Rita Garments Versus Sh. Ghanshyam Bajaj High Court of Delhi
19-08-2005 Sundaram Finance Services Ltd., rep. by its President, the Principal Officer, having its Office at Deshabandhu Plaza, No. 47, Whites Road, Chennai Versus Shoba Garments (P) Ltd., No. 127-B, Brickkiln Road, Norton Shanmuga Building, II Floor, Purasawalkam, Chennai-600 007 and others High Court of Judicature at Madras
09-11-2004 MERBANC FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED, PANJAGUTTA VERSUS CHILIPI KRISH GARMENTS (P) LTD. High Court of Andhra Pradesh
13-07-2004 Garments India Exporters Versus Director of Enforcement Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange New Delhi
21-06-2004 M/s.S.M. Garments Private Limited Versus Inspector General of Registration & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
18-03-2004 Radhamani India Ltd., Decree-holder Versus Imperial Garments Ltd High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
15-03-2004 Venkateshwara Garments and Exports and Another V/S Dena Bank Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal At Mumbai
07-11-2003 Modesty Garments Versus Union of India High Court of Delhi
10-02-2003 M/s.Amarjothi Spinning Mills Ltd. Versus M/s. B.R.B.Garments High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-11-2002 The Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation Limited, rep. by its Madras North Branch Senior Manager Versus M.S. Gopal, Proprietor, Suki Garments & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
25-10-2002 M/s. Shanthi Garments Pvt. Ltd. Versus Regional Provident Fund, Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Organisation High Court of Judicature at Madras
29-08-2002 Sonal Garments Versus Trimbak Shankar Karve High Court of Judicature at Bombay
30-04-2002 M/s. Chevron Garments (P) Ltd. 1986 Trichy Main Road, Singanallur, Coimbatore, Rep. by its Managing Director S. Ramanathan Versus Sri Malini Spinning Mills Ltd. (Formerly P.A. Mills Ltd.) Trichy Main Road, Ammapalayam Village Sandhiyur, Attayampatty (via) Mallur, Salem-636 203. Rep. by its Chief Accountant K.S.S. Prakaash High Court of Judicature at Madras
26-04-2002 Plaza Garments Versus Textile Apparels High Court of Delhi