w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Harinarayan Sharma v/s Vijay Kumar Soni


Company & Directors' Information:- VIJAY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U25199DL1998PTC096860

Company & Directors' Information:- S C SHARMA AND CO PRIVATE LTD [Active] CIN = U74899DL1948PTC001507

Company & Directors' Information:- SHARMA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999UP2008PTC035620

Company & Directors' Information:- K P SHARMA (INDIA) PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U51109WB1988PTC045569

Company & Directors' Information:- SHARMA CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909WB2017PTC220657

Company & Directors' Information:- P C SHARMA AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45201DL1981PTC012750

Company & Directors' Information:- VIJAY J AND K PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U52100GJ1974PTC002504

Company & Directors' Information:- J. R. SHARMA & COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U24211DL1966PTC004602

Company & Directors' Information:- M K SHARMA AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74994DL1982PTC014090

Company & Directors' Information:- SHARMA AND SHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74900DL2015PTC276949

Company & Directors' Information:- SHARMA & CO. PVT LTD. [Strike Off] CIN = U28991WB1949PTC018064

Company & Directors' Information:- D VIJAY AND COMPANY LIMITED [Dissolved] CIN = U99999MH1933PTC002056

    First Appeal No. 2384 of 2017

    Decided On, 13 February 2020

    At, National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN
    By, PRESIDING MEMBER

    For the Appellant: Nemo. For the Respondent: J.K. Agrawal, Advocate.



Judgment Text


Oral:

The appellant late Shri Harinarayan Sharma owned plot No.D-69A in Bapunagar, Jaipur. He entered into an agreement with the respondent No.2 Dinesh Kumar Jain, whereunder Dinesh Kumar Jain was to construct residential flats on the aforesaid plot at his own cost. The flats proposed to be constructed by Dinesh Kumar Jain were to be shared between him and late Shri Harinarayan Sharma.

The complainant entered into an agreement with Sh. Dinesh Kumar Jain on 18.4.2014 for purchase of one of the flats proposed to be constructed by Shri Dinesh Kumar Jain for a consideration of Rs.88,50,000/- and made part payment of Rs.1327500/- to him. The construction of the flat having not been completed, he approached the State Commission by way of a consumer complaint impleading the builder Dinesh Kumar Jain as well as the land owner late Shri Harinarayan Sharma as the opposite parties in the complaint.

2. The complaint was resisted by the appellant who interalia stated in his written version that he had no knowledge of the agreement between the complainant and Shri Dinesh Kumar Jain. He also stated in his written version that no payment was received by him from the complainant and Shri Dinesh Kumar Jain had got his signature on the agreement between him and the complainant without explaining the contents of the document to him, taking advantage of his old age and his weak physical and mental condition.

3. The builder Shri Dinesh Kumar Jain did not come forward to contest the consumer complaint. The State Commission allowed the consumer complaint against both the opposite parties, i.e. the builder Shri Dinesh Kumar Jain as well as the appellant late Shri Harinarayan Sharma by directing them to refund of Rs.1327500/- to the complainant alongwith 9% interest and compensation quantified at Rs.25,000/-. Being aggrieved, the appellant approached this Commission by way of this appeal.

4. It is not in dispute that the plot on which construction was proposed to be raised by Shri Dinesh Kumar Jain was owned by the appellant. The agreement executed between the appellant and Shri Dinesh Kumar Jain clearly shows that it was solely for the builder Shri Dinesh Kumar Jain to construct a multistoried building on the plot of the appellant. The agreement also shows that the entire expenditure on the construction was to be incurred by the builder alone without any monetary contribution by the appellant. The agreement also shows that on receiving possession of the plot, the builder was to pay rent equivalent to rent of two houses to the appellant till the construction of the building was completed by him. The entire responsibility to get the property subdivided, approval of the plans and completion of the construction rested with the builder, without the appellant being in any manner responsible for the same. Both, the builder as well as the appellant could book the units following to their respective shares. A Power of Attorney was also executed by the appellant in favour of the developer. Thus, the appellant had absolutely no role to play in the construction of the building on the plot though the plot on which construction was planned belonged to him. Thus the said agreement was not a Joint Development Agreement.

5. A perusal of the Agreement to Sell executed with the complainant would show that it was executed between only two parties to the said agreement, the first being the developer Shri Dinesh Kumar Jain and the second party being the complainant Vijay Kumar Soni. There was no third party to the agreement. It was clearly stated in the agreement that the first party i.e. Shri Dinesh Kumar Jain would construct a multistoried residential complex on Plot No.D-69A owned by the appellant Shri Harinarayan Sharma and he wanted to sell to the complainant, front side of the third floor in the proposed building which he was competent to sell. Under the agreement, it was for Shri Dinesh Kumar Jain to start construction within three months of the execution of the agreement with the complainant. The entire sale consideration was to be paid by the complainant to Shri Dinesh Kumar Jain. No payment to the appellant was envisaged in the said agreement.

6. Thus, it is evident that not only the responsibility to construct the building on the plot of the appellant was of Shri Dinesh Kumar Jain the entire payment from the complainant was to be received by him alone.

7. It is an admitted position before me that no payment whatsoever was made by the complainant to the appellant Shri Harinarayan Sharma. As noted earlier, the Agreement to Sell with the complainant was executed only by Shri Dinesh Kumar Jain. Though the said agreement also bears signature of the appellant the said signature does not make him a party to the aforesaid agreement when it was clearly stated in the document that the agreement was executed between Shri Dinesh Kumar Jain as the first party and the complainant Vijay Kumar Soni as the second party. Obviously, the signature of the appellant would have been taken on the agreement on account of his being the owner of the land on which a building was proposed to be constructed by Shri Dinesh Kumar Jain, in order to ensure transfer of title in the land underneath the proposed flat, to the complainant, which could be done only by the appellant.

8. Since (i) there is no privity of contract between the complainant and the appellant (ii) no consideration has been received by the appellant from the complainant and (iii) obligation to construct a building in the said plot rested solely with Shri Dinesh Kumar Jain, the complainant, in my opinion, cannot be said to be a consumer of the complainant.

9. Even otherwise a consumer complaint can be instituted against the seller of the goods or the service provider as the case may be only if there is a defect or deficiency on the part of the seller of the goods or the service provided in the goods sold or the services rendered, as the case may be. Since the construction was to be made solely by Shri Dinesh Kumar Jain, there was no defect or deficiency on the part of the appellant in rendering services to the complainant, even if it is assumed for the sake of argument that the complainant was a consumer of both, Shri Dinesh Kumar Jain as well as the appellant Shri Harinarayan Sharma.

10. The learned counsel f

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

or the appellant refers to the decision of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in Mrs. Jaya Bhandari & Ors. Vs. Malhan Builders & Ors. [(2010) 7 AD (Delhi) 683], decided on 25.8.2020. The aforesaid decision in my opinion, has absolutely no application to the present case when no defect or deficiency on the part of the appellant in rendering services to the complainant is even alleged. 11. For the reasons stated hereinabove, the appeal is allowed and the order of the State Commission, to the extent the said order is directed against the appellant, is set aside. However, the impugned order to the extent it is directed against Shri Dinesh Kumar Jain, is confirmed. The appeal stands disposed of.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

20-10-2020 Vijay Kishore Anand & Others Versus State of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. Transport Lucknow & Others High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
16-10-2020 Umesh Kumar Sharma Versus State of Uttarakhand & Others Supreme Court of India
15-10-2020 Rajasthan State Road Development & Construction Corporation Limited Versus Piyush Kant Sharma & Others Supreme Court of India
23-09-2020 Charu Sharma & Others Versus Birla Sun Life Insurance Company Ltd., Maharshtra & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-09-2020 Arun Sharma Versus Roxann Sharma In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
15-09-2020 United India Insurance Company Ltd., Through The Regional Manager, New Delhi Versus Dinesh Vijay National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
14-09-2020 Vijay Vilasrao Sutare Versus The State of Maharashtra, Through, Secretary, home department, State of Maharashtra, Mantralay Mumbai & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
08-09-2020 Arun Kumar Sharma Versus Adesh Goel & Others High Court of Delhi
08-09-2020 Sidharth Vijay Shah Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
07-09-2020 Suneeta Sharma Versus Greater Mohali Area Development Authority, Punjab & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
04-09-2020 Vijay Singh Yadav Versus Ajay Shanker Rai High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
03-09-2020 Rashid Khan Pathan & In The Matter Of: In Re: Vijay Kurle & Others Supreme Court of India
02-09-2020 All India Union Bank Officer, Staff Association Rep. by its General Secretary, AIBOA, Chennai Versus Brajeshwar Sharma, The Chief General Manager(HR) Union Bank of India, Mumbai High Court of Judicature at Madras
31-08-2020 Rajesh Kumar Sharma @ Rajesh Kumar Versus C.B.I. High Court of Delhi
31-08-2020 Dr. Vijay Mallya Versus State Bank of India & Others Supreme Court of India
26-08-2020 Oriental Insurance Company Limited Versus Nand Kishore Sharma & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
25-08-2020 Abhishek Sharma @ Chanchal Pandit Versus State of U.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
24-08-2020 Sanjay Kumar Sharma & Another Versus Union of India & Another High Court of Gauhati
24-08-2020 ICICI Bank, ICICI Bank Through Manager, Rajasthan Versus Ram Prakash Sharma National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
21-08-2020 H.N. Sharma & Anr versus Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors. High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-08-2020 Vijay Cotton & Fibre Co., Maharashtra Versus New India Insurance Company Ltd., Maharashtra & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
14-08-2020 Nipun Sharma Versus Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Sector 12, Chandigarh High Court of Punjab and Haryana
14-08-2020 Union of India & Another Versus M/s. K.C. Sharma & Co. & Others Supreme Court of India
11-08-2020 V.P. Sharma & Others Versus Dr. G.S. Kochar Surgeon Urologist) & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
11-08-2020 Vineeta Sharma V/S Rakesh Sharma and Others. Supreme Court of India
11-08-2020 Vijay Pal Singh Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Delhi
11-08-2020 Vineeta Sharma Versus Rakesh Sharma & Others Supreme Court of India
07-08-2020 Vijay Ramswarup Sharma Versus State of Gujarat High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
06-08-2020 Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd., Rajasthan Versus Kailash Chand Sharma National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
29-07-2020 R. Vijay Versus Shabeena Begum & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-07-2020 Manish Sharma & Another Versus Urmila Arora High Court of Delhi
22-07-2020 Radheshyam Darsheema Versus Kunwar Vijay Shah & Others High Court of Madhya Pradesh
21-07-2020 Ex-Subedar Vinod Kumar Sharma Versus National Insurance Co. Ltd. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
03-07-2020 Mohd. Quasim Versus P. Vijay Prakash High Court of for the State of Telangana
24-06-2020 Tara Prasad Sharma Versus State of Sikkim & Others High Court of Sikkim
23-06-2020 Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., Through The General Manager & Another Versus Narendra Kumar Sharma National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
22-06-2020 Ashok Sharma Versus State of Assam & Another High Court of Gauhati
17-06-2020 Ministry of Railways Through Divisional Commercial Manager Versus V. Vijay Kumar National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
17-06-2020 Aman Sharma Versus The Chief Election Commissioner & Another High Court of Madhya Pradesh
16-06-2020 Dr. Vijay Mallya Versus State Bank of India & Others Supreme Court of India
15-06-2020 Rajan Sharma & Another Versus Union of India & Another Supreme Court of India
02-06-2020 Prateek Sharma & Another Versus Union of India & Another High Court of Delhi
30-05-2020 Kshitiz Sharma Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
29-05-2020 Vijay Ganesh @ Vijay @ Kurangu Vijay Versus State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Principal Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise (IX) Department & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
27-05-2020 Ajay @ Vijay @ Babu Jaiswal, Chhattisgarh Versus State of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh
19-05-2020 Mukesh Sharma Versus C.V. Ramana High Court of for the State of Telangana
19-05-2020 Randhir Rambrij Sharma Versus Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation High Court of Judicature at Bombay
15-05-2020 Rahul @ Vijay Versus The State of Rajasthan Supreme Court of India
14-05-2020 Meena Sharma Versus Nand Lal & Another High Court of Delhi
08-05-2020 Virendra Kumar Versus Vijay Kumar & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
07-05-2020 Vijay Kumar Agrahari Versus State of U.P. & Another High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
06-05-2020 Kamla Sharma Versus North Delhi Municipal Corporation High Court of Delhi
04-05-2020 Air India Ltd. Through, Its General Manager (O) Versus Vijay Dhawan Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission New Delhi
04-05-2020 Re: Vijay Kurle & Others Supreme Court of India
29-04-2020 Anurag Sarmah @ Sharma Versus State of Assam & Another High Court of Gauhati
27-04-2020 Omprakash & Others Versus Vijay Dwarkada Varma In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
27-04-2020 RE : Vijay Kurle & Others Supreme Court of India
22-04-2020 Anand Sharma Versus State of Rajasthan & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
20-04-2020 Dr. Mahesh Sharma & Another Versus Cabinet Secretary, Govt. of India, Cabinet Secretariat, New Delhi & Others High Court of Rajasthan
15-04-2020 Sanjeev Sharma Versus State (N.C.T. of Delhi) High Court of Delhi
13-04-2020 Mamta Sharma & Another Versus State of Chhattisgarh Through The Chief Secretary, Chhattisgarh & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
08-04-2020 C.H. Sharma & Another Versus State of Maharashtra & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
08-04-2020 Mohmmad Yunus Versus Madho Prasad Sharma High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
30-03-2020 Prashant Sharma Versus State of Sikkim & Others High Court of Sikkim
23-03-2020 Rajasthan Public Service Commission & Others Versus Megha Sharma & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
20-03-2020 Anju Sharma Versus Sunita Kumari & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
19-03-2020 State of Uttar Pradesh & Others V/S Vijay Shankar Dubey Supreme Court of India
18-03-2020 Shambhu Prasad Sharma Advocate Versus Renu Jogi High Court of Chhattisgarh
18-03-2020 State of M.P. & Others Versus Rajendra Kumar Sharma High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwailor
18-03-2020 Saurav Sharma Versus State of HP & Others High Court of Himachal Pradesh
17-03-2020 Aashu Pandit @ Aashu Bajpai @ Aash Narayan Sharma Versus Union of India High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
13-03-2020 Unnati Bhardwaj & Another Versus K.P. Sharma High Court of Delhi
12-03-2020 Vijay Kumar Singh Versus Rana Cooperative Housing Society & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
11-03-2020 Ajay Sharma & Others Versus Kulwant Singh High Court of Delhi
06-03-2020 Rampal Sharma & Others Versus State of Rajasthan & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
06-03-2020 Mithun Sharma Versus Tripura Gramin Bank & Others High Court of Tripura
05-03-2020 M/s. N.K. Enterprise, West Bengal & Another V/S Narayan Prasad Sharma & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
05-03-2020 Sancha Bahadur Subba Versus Ramesh Sharma High Court of Sikkim
04-03-2020 Ashok Kumar Sharma Versus Nirmaldas Manikpuri High Court of Chhattisgarh
04-03-2020 Amitabh Versus Amit Rghunandan Saran Sharma & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
04-03-2020 Madhya Pradesh Housing & Infrastructure Development Board & Another Versus Vijay Bodana & Others Supreme Court of India
28-02-2020 Dilip Kumar Sharma Versus State of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh
28-02-2020 Vijay Kishanrao Kurundkar & Another Versus State of Maharashtra & Others Supreme Court of India
25-02-2020 Mahesh Kumar Sharma Versus The Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
24-02-2020 Vijay Anand & Another Versus Vedic Conclave Pvt. Ltd. & Others West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
24-02-2020 Sarwan Kumar Sharma Versus Ranjana Sharma @ Ranjana Rani & Another High Court of Delhi
19-02-2020 Vijay Soni Versus Anju @ Uma High Court of Rajasthan
19-02-2020 Bhupendra Sharma & Others Versus Union of India, Represented By The Secretary Ministry of Defence, New Delhi & Others High Court of Kerala
18-02-2020 Jagdish Prasad Vijay Versus Niti Aaayog, Erstwhile, Planning Commission Through The Dy. Chairman, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
18-02-2020 Vijay Mehta @ Bijal Mehta Versus State of Bihar High Court of Judicature at Patna
18-02-2020 ICICI Bank Ltd., Rajashtan & Others Versus Ravindra Kumar Sharma & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-02-2020 M/s. Reliance General Insurance Company Versus Rakesh Sharma & Others Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission New Delhi
17-02-2020 Ram Prakash Sharma Versus State of Bihar High Court of Judicature at Patna
17-02-2020 Vijay Prakash Mishra Versus State of U.P. & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
14-02-2020 Vinay Sharma Versus Union of India & Others Supreme Court of India
13-02-2020 Vijay Karia And Others V/S Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi Srl And Others Supreme Court of India
12-02-2020 Praveen Kumar Sharma Versus State of U.P. through its Principal Secretary (Home), Secretariat, Lucknow, U.P. & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
12-02-2020 Umesh Chand Sharma & Others Versus Parsvnath Developers Limited National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
11-02-2020 Shashibala M. Sharma Versus ICICI Bank Ltd. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
10-02-2020 Brahmacharimayum Achou Sharma & Others Versus The State of Manipur through the Chief Secretary-cum-Secretary (Power), Govt. of Manipur & Others High Court of Manipur