w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Others Vandana Panwar


Company & Directors' Information:- VANDANA PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51909KA1984PTC006136

    W.P.(C). No. 7149 of 2018 & C.M. Nos. 27277, 27278 of 2018

    Decided On, 13 July 2018

    At, High Court of Delhi

    By, THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI & THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

    For the Petitioners: Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel, Nitesh Kumar Singh, Tania Ahlawat, Palak Rohmetra, Advocates. For the Respondent: None.



Judgment Text

1. The petitioner, Department of Education, Government of NCT of Delhi, is aggrieved by the judgment dated 06.11.2017, passed by the Principal Bench, Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi allowing OA No.1562/2017, filed by the respondent for quashing and setting aside the memorandum dated 18.06.2015, whereunder, her application for implementation of the increment payable to her from July, 2008 was turned down by the competent authority on the ground that she did not fulfil the requirement of 6 months qualifying period for earning an increment, as on 01.07.2008. Further, the respondent had sought directions to the petitioner to step up her pay at par with that of her junior, Ms.Mamta Meena w.e.f. 01.07.2008, by granting her an increment payable to her w.e.f. the said date.

2. The brief relevant facts of the case are that the petitioner/Directorate of Education had issued Advertisement No.2/2006 for the post of PGT/Lecturer in the year 2006. In response thereto, the respondent, Ms.Mamta Meena and several others had submitted their applications. Both the respondent and Ms.Mamta Meena were duly selected to the post of PGT/Lecturer in schools under the petitioner/GNCTD. The petitioner had issued an offer of appointment, vide letter dated 19.07.2007, calling upon the respondent to produce all her documents relating to her educational qualifications, proof of age on 07.08.2007, etc. , which she did. The respondent was declared medically fit on 05.10.2007 whereas Ms.Mamta Meena, with whom the respondent claims parity, was declared medically fit on 09.10.2007 i.e. after the petitioner.

3. A letter of appointment was issued to Ms.Mamta Meena on 07/08.11.2007 and she joined the subject post on 19.11.2007. However, on account of a delay in the verification of her age, the respondent could not be appointed on the same date as Ms.Mamta Meena. She was appointed later on, vide letter dated 28.02.2008, received by her on 04.03.2008.

4. In the final seniority list of the PGT/Lecturer promoted/appointed between 01.04.2006 to 31.03.2010, based on comparative merit of candidates issued by the petitioner vide circular dated 19.07.2013, admittedly, the respondent was placed at Sl. No.3235 whereas Ms.Mamta Meena was placed much below her at Sl.No.3279. On issuance of the aforesaid seniority list, the respondent submitted an application dated 06.11.2013 to the School Principal for stepping up of her pay to bring it at par with that of Ms.Mamta Meena, who was junior to her. The said representation was considered and rejected by the petitioners vide their impugned letter dated 18.06.2015. Aggrieved thereby, the respondent filed the aforesaid OA before the Tribunal.

5. The petitioners filed a counter affidavit admitting inter alia the factual position. They referred to the revised pay rules wherein the qualifying period for earning an increment has been prescribed as 6 months as on 01.07.2008 and submitted that since the respondent had joined her duty on 04.03.2008, she did not have to her credit, the qualifying period of 6 months as on 01.07.2008 and was, therefore, not entitled to any increment. As against the above, it was stated that Ms.Mamta Meena with whom the respondent sought parity, had qualified a period of six months on 01.07.2008, since she had joined duty on 07/08.11.2007 and consequently, she was granted the increment.

6. After considering the submissions made by both sides, the Tribunal observed that it is only because of non-payment of one annual increment to the respondent, that the pay of her junior was more than her and held that she was entitled to salary at par with her junior in view of the well settled legal position in the cases of Gurcharan Singh Grewal vs. Punjab State Electricity Board, (2009) 3 SCC 94; Punjab State Electricity Board vs. Gurmail Singh, (2008) 7 SCC 245; and Commissioner and Secretary to Government of Haryana vs. Ram Swarup Ganda, (2011) 15 SCC 722, wherein, it has been held that the principle of stepping up of pay has to be applied across the board in all cases where a person who is senior, gets lesser salary than his junior, requiring the salary of the senior to be stepped up and brought at par with the junior. The Tribunal also referred to a judgment in the case of Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors. vs. Saroj Khosla & Ors., (2013) 199 DLT (CN) 27 DB, wherein relying on the decisions of the Supreme Court cited above, a Division Bench of this Court had directed that the respondent employee in that case would be entitled to stepping up of pay at par with persons immediately junior to them in the combined seniority list.

7. After referring to the facts of the captioned case, the Tribunal concluded that the mandate of the aforesaid decisions is clear that where the salary of the junior is higher than that of the senior, the senior shall be entitled to fixation of salary at par with the junior, irrespective of the circumstances under which the junior was/is drawing a higher pay. In the light of the aforesaid decisions, the impugned memorandum dated 18.06.2015 issued by the petitioner rejecting the request of the respondent for stepping up of her pay was quashed and set aside by the Tribunal and the petitioner has been directed to fix the salary of the respondent at par with Ms.Mamta Meena w.e.f. 01.07.2008.

8. Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned Tribunal failed to appreciate that the respondent could not have earned increment as she had to her credit, less than 6 months of service as on 01.07.2008, whereas her junior, Ms.Mamta Meena was granted an increment since she had 6 months of service to her credit, as on 01.07.2008 and simply because her junior had joined before her, could not be a ground to grant an annual increment to the respondent, at par with the junior. Learned counsel further states that the petitioner cannot be blamed for any delay in verification of the proof of age submitted by the respondent. She submits that the appointment letter could have been issued by the petitioner only after verification of the respondent’s age, which took some time. It was due to this that the same was issued to the respondent on 04.03.2008.

9. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and carefully perused the impugned judgment, the documents and pleadings before the Tribunal. We are of the opinion that the view expressed by the Tribunal in the impugned judgment to the effect that where the salary of the junior is higher than that of the senior, the senior is also entitled to fixation of salary at par with her junior, is a logical conclusion backed by several decisions of the Supreme Court and High Court on the aforesaid aspect. In any case, the respondent cannot be held responsible for the delay in verification of her age as she had taken all necessary steps to submit the requisite documents to the petitioner in time. It is only fortuitous that the documents of Ms.Mamta Meena were got verifie

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

d earlier due to which a letter of appointment was issued to her on 07/08.11.2007, whereas it took some time to verify the documents submitted by the respondent and resultantly, the letter of appointment was issued to her on 04.03.2008. The respondent cannot be held responsible for the said delay. Further, in the seniority list drawn by the petitioner, the respondent’s seniority has been fixed over and above that of Ms.Mamta Meena. This being the position, the respondent was justified in claiming that she is entitled to stepping of pay at par with that of her junior. 10. For the aforesaid reasons, we do not see any merit in the present petition. The impugned judgment is affirmed and the petition is dismissed in limine along with the pending applications.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

17-09-2019 Vandana Sharma Versus Dwarka Court Bar Associates & Others High Court of Delhi
03-09-2019 Raosaheb Mallapa Magdum & Others Versus Vandana Shivajirao Mane & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
30-05-2019 Vandana Varma & Others Versus State of U.P. & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
29-05-2019 Vandana Versus Ankit Bhardwaj High Court of Punjab and Haryana
02-05-2019 Om Prakash Shukla, Dead Through Lrs, Vandana Shukla & Others Versus Ramkrishna Tiwari & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
02-05-2019 Vandana Yogendra Versus Yogendra Gupta High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
01-04-2019 Vandana Ramesh Wagh & Others Versus State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Department of Rural Development & Panchayat Raj Department & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
06-02-2019 Shiv Singh Versus Vandana High Court of Madhya Pradesh
22-01-2019 Vandana Mimani Versus Sunil Jhawar High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
06-12-2018 Ramal Advani, Proprietor Versus Vandana Suresh Punwani High Court of Judicature at Bombay
21-09-2018 Vandana Versus State Bank of India, (Formerly State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur), Zonal Office, Zone-1 & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
14-09-2018 Vandana Shukla Versus Indian Institute of Public Administration & Others High Court of Delhi
08-08-2018 Vandana Versus Abhilasha In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
07-06-2018 Vandana Pathak Versus HDFC Life Insurance Company Ltd. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
28-05-2018 Vandana Bansal Versus State of U.P. & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
02-04-2018 M. Kuppaswamy (D) Tr. Lrs. Versus R. Vandana Supreme Court of India
20-03-2018 Dr. Vandana Vahistha Versus State of U.P. & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
09-03-2018 Bhaktvatsal Singh Rajput Versus Vandana Rajput High Court of Chhattisgarh
20-02-2018 PR. Commissioner Versus Dr. Vandana Gupta High Court of Delhi
15-02-2018 Dinesh Tripathi Versus Vandana Tripathi High Court of Madhya Pradesh
15-02-2018 Dinesh Tripathi Versus Vandana Tripathi High Court of Madhya Pradesh
09-02-2018 Dr. Vandana Tyagi Versus Apeejay Saraswati P.G. College For Girls & Others Supreme Court of India
05-01-2018 IL & FS Financial Services Ltd. Versus Vandana Global Limited High Court of Judicature at Bombay
30-10-2017 Telangana Housing Board, Rep. by its Vice chairman Cum Managing Director & Another Versus V. Keerti Vandana Telangana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hyderabad
19-09-2017 Vandana Srivastava Versus State of U.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
07-09-2017 Vandana Verma Versus Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
05-09-2017 Vandana Pandurang Patle Versus Kalpana Shikshan Sanstha & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
22-08-2017 Dr. Vandana Goel Versus M/s. Unitech Limited & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
31-03-2017 Vandana Versus Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University, Nagpur Ravindranath Tagore Road, Civil Lines, Nagpur through its Registrar & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
31-03-2017 Commissioner of C. Ex., Mumbai-III V/S Vandana Dyeing Pvt. Ltd. Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal West Zonal Bench At Mumbai
23-03-2017 Dropadi Meena Versus Vandana Meena High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
15-02-2017 The United India Insurance Company Ltd., through its Regional Manager Versus Vandana & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
10-02-2017 Vandana Versus State of Uttar Pradesh High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
08-12-2016 Vandana Gupta Versus Mukesh Babu High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
21-09-2016 Vandana Kapadia Versus Bharti Axa Life Insurance Co. Ltd. & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
14-09-2016 Vandana Creations Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai High Court of Judicature at Bombay
05-09-2016 Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus., Surat-I Versus Vandana Art Prints Pvt. Ltd. Supreme Court of India
22-08-2016 Vandana Gupta Versus Mukesh Babu High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
12-05-2016 For the Appellant: Inderjeet Singh, Advocate. For the Respondents: R3, Vandana Malhotra, Advocate. High Court of Punjab and Haryana
22-12-2015 Vandana Mishra Versus State of U.P. & Others High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
16-12-2015 Vandana Vidhut Limited, through its President (Commercial), Sirgitti Industrial Area, Sector-B, Bilaspur (CG) Versus Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity & Another High Court of Chhattisgarh
20-10-2015 Vandana Malhotra Versus Global Investments & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
07-10-2015 M/s Vandana Vidhyut Limited Raipur & Others Versus Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission Raipur & Others Appellate Tribunal for Electricity Appellate Jurisdiction
14-08-2015 Vandana Gupta & Others Versus Kuwait Airways Ltd. & Others High Court of Delhi
14-07-2015 Vandana Vijay Wabale Versus The State of Maharashtra, through Deputy Director of Education, Pune Zone & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
20-02-2015 Matru Vandana Trust Versus Director of Income-tax (Exemption), Mumbai Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Mumbai
05-02-2015 Vandana Versus The State of Maharashtra In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
04-02-2015 Km. Vandana Mishra Versus Union of India, Through Secretary, Post & Telegraph Department, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Lucknow Bench
23-12-2014 Vandana Travels & Tours Versus Commr of C. Ex. & Service Tax (Appeals) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
18-12-2014 The Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Company Limited Versus Vandana & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
17-12-2014 Vandana Budhiraja Versus State of Haryana & Others High Court of Punjab and Haryana
01-10-2014 Vandana Batra Versus Aerens Goldsouk International Ltd. High Court of Delhi
12-09-2014 Anita Versus Dr. (Smt.) Vandana Sethi Uttarakhand State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dehradun
05-09-2014 J.D. Bagree Hospital & Others Versus Vandana Goyal & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
29-08-2014 Vandana Varma Versus State of U.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
06-08-2014 Patel Rameshbhai Dahyabhai Versus Patel Pranav Kiritbhai (Vandana) & Others High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
18-07-2014 M/s. Vandana Art Prints (P) Ltd Versus CCE&ST., Surat I Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal West Zonal Bench At Ahmedabad
10-07-2014 Surendra Patel s/o Ramji Patel Versus Ritu @ Vandana Patel w/o Surendra Patel High Court of Madhya Pradesh
05-06-2014 Suhas Pandurang Chandgadkar & Another Versus Vandana & Others High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench At Dharwad
21-05-2014 Vandana Srivastava Versus State of U.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
24-04-2014 Chandra Prakash Tanaya Versus Vandana High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
22-04-2014 Vandana Sharma Versus Hemlata Goswamy & Another High Court of Delhi
22-04-2014 Vasu P. Shetty Versus M/s. Hotel Vandana Palace & Others Supreme Court of India
26-03-2014 National Insurance Company Limited Versus M. Vandana & Others Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hyderabad
13-03-2014 I.C.I.C.I. Lombard, General Insurance Co. Ltd., Thorugh its Legal Manager Versus Vandana Kailas Kadlag & Another Maharshtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Aurangabad
12-03-2014 Vandana Global Limited Versus M/s. Jaypee Engg. & Hydraulics Equipment Company Limited & Others Chhatisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Raipur
09-01-2014 Smt. Varsha Versus Smt. Vandana Kishore Tode In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
18-12-2013 Smt. Vandana & Others Versus Pradip In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
22-10-2013 Vandana Bhimrao Jadhav & Others Versus Sagar Bhimrao Jadhav High Court of Judicature at Bombay
12-08-2013 Vandana Global Limited., Chhattisgarh Versus Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission & Another Appellate Tribunal for Electricity Appellate Jurisdiction
31-07-2013 Vandana Versus Devidas In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
09-07-2013 Jet Airways (India) Ltd. Versus Smt. Vandana Jain & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
09-05-2013 Lalitkumar R. Yadav Versus Mrs. Vandana Lalit Kumar Yadav & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
18-04-2013 Gopi Das Mimani & Others Versus Vandana Real Estates (P) Ltd. High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
02-04-2013 M/s. Global Enterprises Through Proprietress Mrs. Vandana & Another Versus M/s. New India Assurance Co Ltd. & Others Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Mumbai
26-03-2013 Executive Engineer, Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board & Another Versus Ku. Vandana Yadav & Another High Court of Madhya Pradesh
21-03-2013 Bela Kapoor & Others Versus Vandana Kapoor & Others High Court of Delhi
04-03-2013 Lalit Versus Vandana & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
13-02-2013 Raja Babu Singh Versus Vandana Tomar Singh High Court of Delhi
08-01-2013 Smt. Vandana Gulati Versus Gurmeet Singh Alias Mangal Singh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
06-12-2012 Vandana Dayabhai Patel Versus LIC Hsg.Finance Limited & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
17-09-2012 The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Versus Vandana wd/o Pradip Ramteke & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
17-09-2012 Suresh Bhardwaj Versus Vandana High Court of Madhya Pradesh
11-09-2012 Vandana Aggarwal Versus M/s. Mahagun Developers Ltd. & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
03-09-2012 Minor Y. Vandana rep. by her father & natural guardian G. Yuvaraj Versus The Commissioner of Technical Education, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-06-2012 Life Insurance Corporation Of India Versus Vandana Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Panchkula
16-04-2012 Smt Vandana A Chouhan & Others Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others High Court of Chattisgarh
28-03-2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax - 25, Mumbai Versus M/s.Vandana Properties High Court of Judicature at Bombay
02-03-2012 Mrs. Vandana Prasad Versus Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
13-02-2012 Vandana Bidyut Chaterjee Versus The Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
25-01-2012 Vandana Travels & Tours Versus C.C.E. & S. Tax, Allahabad Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
21-11-2011 M/s. Hotel Vandana Palace Versus The Authorized Officer Under securitization & reconstruction of financial assets & Others High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench At Dharwad
05-09-2011 Mrs. Vandana Devi Heda Versus Indian Oil Corporation High Court of Chattisgarh
30-05-2011 Vandana Versus Krishan Kumar High Court of Punjab and Haryana
20-04-2011 Vandana Gupta Versus State Of Uttar Pradesh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
31-03-2011 Vandana Jain D/o KasturiLal Jain V/S Union of India through Secretary to Govt. of India, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of Higher Education [Alongwith OA Nos. 758-CH-2010, 36, 113, 140, 147, 149, 163, 166, 170, 173, 177, 179, 216, 218, 225, 234, 236, 270 and 271-CH-2011] Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh Bench
24-02-2011 Smt. Vandana Ukey & Others Versus Mohd. Ameen & Others High Court of Madhya Pradesh
22-02-2011 Anil Jaiswal Versus Vandana Puri High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
11-02-2011 VANDANA MISHRA VERSUS STATE OF U.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
10-01-2011 University Of Delhi & Another Versus Vandana Kandari & Another High Court of Delhi


LawyerServices is a Premium Legal Tech solution.


Lawyers, Law Firms, Government Departments and Corporates rely on us for, Workflow Automation, Data Aggregation, Timely Updates, Case Management, Intelligent Research, Latest Legal Data Updates and a LOT more!

If you are a legal professional, CONTACT US, in order to see how our UNIQUE solution can benefit your organization.

Features Intro Close Box