w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Electrosteel Steels Limited, Bokaro & Others v/s The State of Jharkhand through Secretary, Department of Industries, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi & Others


Company & Directors' Information:- ELECTROSTEEL STEELS LIMITED [Active] CIN = L27310JH2006PLC012663

Company & Directors' Information:- T T G INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27209TN1987PLC014169

Company & Directors' Information:- V I P INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = L25200MH1968PLC013914

Company & Directors' Information:- A L M INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U14100DL1996PLC129067

Company & Directors' Information:- S R K INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = L17121MH1991PLC257750

Company & Directors' Information:- S R INDUSTRIES LTD [Active] CIN = L29246PB1989PLC009531

Company & Directors' Information:- V S L STEELS LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27109KA2003PLC058185

Company & Directors' Information:- F E INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U36100PB2003PTC026482

Company & Directors' Information:- N K INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = L91110GJ1987PLC009905

Company & Directors' Information:- T S I INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U18101HR1997PTC034478

Company & Directors' Information:- H M STEELS LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27106PB1999PLC022707

Company & Directors' Information:- P D P STEELS LTD [Active] CIN = U65921WB1996PLC077555

Company & Directors' Information:- H G I INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = L40200WB1944PLC011754

Company & Directors' Information:- R P INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27100GJ2011PTC075812

Company & Directors' Information:- D D INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1974PLC007169

Company & Directors' Information:- A G INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27300HR1991PTC031378

Company & Directors' Information:- H. J. INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17120GJ2010PTC060769

Company & Directors' Information:- S D S STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51420TN2006PTC060563

Company & Directors' Information:- G R S INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U00000PB2005PLC029159

Company & Directors' Information:- R K K R STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27101TN1965PTC006069

Company & Directors' Information:- T S L INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = L65999WB1994PLC065255

Company & Directors' Information:- V S P INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17111TZ2005PTC011820

Company & Directors' Information:- M N INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24100TG2012PTC079737

Company & Directors' Information:- G I INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15312PB2010PTC033806

Company & Directors' Information:- E T C INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U31200MP1995PLC009281

Company & Directors' Information:- O P STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27109DL1987PTC027085

Company & Directors' Information:- S K INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U74899DL1991PTC045572

Company & Directors' Information:- S R V E INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U03210TZ2006PLC012577

Company & Directors' Information:- H R STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1995PTC070914

Company & Directors' Information:- B G STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1991PTC042560

Company & Directors' Information:- P AND P INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U21010MH1992PLC068885

Company & Directors' Information:- N G INDUSTRIES LTD [Active] CIN = L74140WB1994PLC065937

Company & Directors' Information:- N G A STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27109TZ1995PTC005908

Company & Directors' Information:- C V S STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29253DL2009PTC189824

Company & Directors' Information:- S L INDUSTRIES P. LTD. [Active] CIN = U15331WB1989PTC047543

Company & Directors' Information:- AMP INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = L51909AS1985PLC002332

Company & Directors' Information:- T R A T INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U25199KL1996PLC010148

Company & Directors' Information:- B R INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1995PLC067120

Company & Directors' Information:- J P STEELS LTD [Active] CIN = U27107AS1992PLC003736

Company & Directors' Information:- N M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74120DL2008PTC175664

Company & Directors' Information:- S N L INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U17115RJ1994PTC008053

Company & Directors' Information:- K P STEELS LIMITED [Liquidated] CIN = U27109TG1986PLC006878

Company & Directors' Information:- P L STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27109UR2004PTC000445

Company & Directors' Information:- M Q STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1997PTC089231

Company & Directors' Information:- J V INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1994PTC057081

Company & Directors' Information:- A R INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27101HR1995PTC032569

Company & Directors' Information:- D V S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1992PTC049221

Company & Directors' Information:- N. STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27106GJ2009PTC056732

Company & Directors' Information:- C D INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27100MH1996PLC101277

Company & Directors' Information:- G V INDUSTRIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74900TG2014PTC096387

Company & Directors' Information:- G S M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U02001DL2002PTC117443

Company & Directors' Information:- B G INDUSTRIES LTD [Active] CIN = U26921ML1980PLC001830

Company & Directors' Information:- P K INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51900DL2012PTC241654

Company & Directors' Information:- C I C STEELS PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27109WB1988PTC045251

Company & Directors' Information:- M J R STEELS PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U74999WB1996PTC076803

Company & Directors' Information:- M D INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U91110GJ1994PTC022025

Company & Directors' Information:- H S M STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27100TG2010PTC067913

Company & Directors' Information:- D C STEELS LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27106PB1990PLC010517

Company & Directors' Information:- L C INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15122UP2013PTC055697

Company & Directors' Information:- S I F STEELS LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27310GJ1972PLC002137

Company & Directors' Information:- G. A. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15435MH2005PTC151817

Company & Directors' Information:- P A S INDUSTRIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active in Progress] CIN = U17121TZ2005PTC012171

Company & Directors' Information:- V AND S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1990PTC039251

Company & Directors' Information:- M U STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27100DL2011PTC228818

Company & Directors' Information:- M K J INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U19111UP1989PTC010468

Company & Directors' Information:- L M STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U13209UP1980PTC005064

Company & Directors' Information:- S I STEELS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U52390PY2009PTC002285

Company & Directors' Information:- P B INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29120MP1994PTC008840

Company & Directors' Information:- R & M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24297TN1972PTC006185

Company & Directors' Information:- A M INDUSTRIES LTD [Active] CIN = U21012WB1977PLC030854

Company & Directors' Information:- A AND S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17117DL1995PTC064137

Company & Directors' Information:- M C INDUSTRIES LTD [Active] CIN = U27106WB1993PLC058995

Company & Directors' Information:- D R INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24100WB2011PTC160058

Company & Directors' Information:- U K INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24241WB1988PTC044355

Company & Directors' Information:- M A STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27109KL2002PTC015691

Company & Directors' Information:- M G I INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27310GJ2006PTC048707

Company & Directors' Information:- A D INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101WB2008PTC131561

Company & Directors' Information:- V J INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29253KA2009PTC050226

Company & Directors' Information:- M D STEELS PRIVATE LTD. [Active] CIN = U74899DL1987PTC029358

Company & Directors' Information:- V T INDUSTRIES PVT LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29150WB1985PLC039217

Company & Directors' Information:- V T INDUSTRIES PVT LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29150WB1985PTC039217

Company & Directors' Information:- G R INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U34300PB1996PTC018671

Company & Directors' Information:- M. K. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15549WB2008PTC130116

Company & Directors' Information:- R S V INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U52399MH2008PTC180489

Company & Directors' Information:- K. A. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U14220JH2008PTC013409

Company & Directors' Information:- D K INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45202CH1994PLC014627

Company & Directors' Information:- D. I. STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27100MH2005PTC153442

Company & Directors' Information:- D G INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U36942WB1946PTC013526

Company & Directors' Information:- R I L INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U70101DL1993PTC052678

Company & Directors' Information:- I S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29100GJ2009PTC057308

Company & Directors' Information:- B M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17000MH1997PTC109621

Company & Directors' Information:- R V S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17111TZ1995PTC006398

Company & Directors' Information:- B N INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U67120AS1994PTC004273

Company & Directors' Information:- A J INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17120MH2004PTC145040

Company & Directors' Information:- A B M STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27101GJ1986PTC008391

Company & Directors' Information:- S. A. A INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U01549TZ1997PTC007927

Company & Directors' Information:- C R I INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Amalgamated] CIN = U29120TZ2002PTC010129

Company & Directors' Information:- A C T INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1984PTC018724

Company & Directors' Information:- G B INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29220PN2011PTC139883

Company & Directors' Information:- S D B INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27107MP1996PLC010394

Company & Directors' Information:- M M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U31300CT2008PTC020916

Company & Directors' Information:- A C INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U29299WB2006PTC109474

Company & Directors' Information:- K M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Converted to LLP and Dissolved] CIN = U74899DL1991PTC043295

Company & Directors' Information:- C J INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U25209MH1998PTC116707

Company & Directors' Information:- N P INDUSTRIES LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U15549PB1989PLC009426

Company & Directors' Information:- J. L. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29141MP2008PTC020731

Company & Directors' Information:- I K INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24100MH2010PTC199474

Company & Directors' Information:- H. D. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27310MH2011PTC216080

Company & Directors' Information:- R. D. G. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U26960DL2008PTC182480

Company & Directors' Information:- R B INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U28999DL2008PTC177248

Company & Directors' Information:- H & H INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U34100DL2010PTC204604

Company & Directors' Information:- M J INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15203KA2011PTC060675

Company & Directors' Information:- B R V INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U32301UP1995PTC018704

Company & Directors' Information:- A. G. INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U25201UP1994PLC017291

Company & Directors' Information:- B R INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U15204AS1993PLC003930

Company & Directors' Information:- I P M INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U25200DL1995PLC068554

Company & Directors' Information:- M R INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74900UP2008PTC036443

Company & Directors' Information:- R D I INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74900DL1995PTC065508

Company & Directors' Information:- J G INDUSTRIES LTD [Active] CIN = L15141WB1983PLC035931

Company & Directors' Information:- V G INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15139JK2015PTC004570

Company & Directors' Information:- S M STEELS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1974PTC007190

Company & Directors' Information:- S N INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29211UP1951PTC002319

Company & Directors' Information:- R B STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27106AS1994PTC004200

Company & Directors' Information:- S. A. STEELS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U27106PB1985PTC006227

Company & Directors' Information:- A H STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1995PTC073017

Company & Directors' Information:- J K L STEELS PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27104DL1997PTC088424

Company & Directors' Information:- E D STEELS PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27310MH1975PTC018180

Company & Directors' Information:- V K STEELS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U27310HP1987PTC007712

Company & Directors' Information:- K G INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U29130WB1951PTC019868

Company & Directors' Information:- N S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U74120UP2012PTC053986

Company & Directors' Information:- N E STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27104WB2002PTC116973

Company & Directors' Information:- H S STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27109PB1995PTC016111

Company & Directors' Information:- G S STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1988PTC030339

Company & Directors' Information:- D U INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29230GJ2016PTC091588

Company & Directors' Information:- K M S STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27310TZ1997PTC008161

Company & Directors' Information:- S R P INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Amalgamated] CIN = U00061BR1984PLC002023

Company & Directors' Information:- S T STEELS PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27106PB1990PTC010915

Company & Directors' Information:- K L STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1984PTC038783

Company & Directors' Information:- S S A P STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27106DL1999PTC101645

Company & Directors' Information:- M F STEELS PVT. LTD [Active] CIN = U74899DL1971PTC005517

Company & Directors' Information:- R G STEELS PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27109WB1987PTC042824

Company & Directors' Information:- C N STEELS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U27100GJ1994PTC022570

Company & Directors' Information:- C P INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U29303MP1949PTC000846

Company & Directors' Information:- J B INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74999MH2013PTC245506

Company & Directors' Information:- S J V INDUSTRIES LTD [Amalgamated] CIN = U15421WB1982PLC035521

Company & Directors' Information:- V V INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U99999DL1980PTC010427

Company & Directors' Information:- K K INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65100DL1982PTC013046

Company & Directors' Information:- A T C INDUSTRIES LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U27109AS1984PLC002201

Company & Directors' Information:- S B STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1984PTC017414

Company & Directors' Information:- N V INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U51909WB1953PTC020952

Company & Directors' Information:- K K STEELS INDIA PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27109PB1990PTC010714

Company & Directors' Information:- S R R STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27105KL1998PTC012156

Company & Directors' Information:- A TO Z INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U31908AS1987PTC002804

Company & Directors' Information:- M. G. STEELS LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999DL1986PLC025140

Company & Directors' Information:- A B N STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27106OR1996PTC004473

Company & Directors' Information:- L K INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17291MH2012PTC233546

Company & Directors' Information:- A Y STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74120UP2014PTC066079

Company & Directors' Information:- G S C INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LTD [Active] CIN = U92114DL1956PTC002616

Company & Directors' Information:- I D STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL2000PTC109048

Company & Directors' Information:- V R STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74899DL1981PTC011447

Company & Directors' Information:- G G INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27320UP1969PTC003282

Company & Directors' Information:- R D STEELS LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27106PB1999PLC022934

Company & Directors' Information:- K S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U31909MH1960PTC011707

Company & Directors' Information:- N D STEELS LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U28111WB1989PLC047025

Company & Directors' Information:- K J STEELS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U27310GJ1981PTC004392

Company & Directors' Information:- V L STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27107WB2004PTC100815

Company & Directors' Information:- S F STEELS PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U51900WB2006PTC107234

Company & Directors' Information:- P R INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U21014DL1971PTC005738

Company & Directors' Information:- R K I INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29190DL2012PTC233413

Company & Directors' Information:- K K K STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27106PB1998PTC020961

Company & Directors' Information:- R K INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U25202AS1988PTC003132

Company & Directors' Information:- K. N. STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27107WB2007PTC117868

Company & Directors' Information:- A AND A STEELS PVT LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27104CH1993PTC012992

Company & Directors' Information:- K R INDUSTRIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U25190KA2012PTC062367

Company & Directors' Information:- Y K INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U19115UP2012PTC051151

Company & Directors' Information:- E S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74999TN2012PTC086119

Company & Directors' Information:- I B INDUSTRIES LTD. [Strike Off] CIN = U28992WB1990PLC050469

Company & Directors' Information:- V I INDUSTRIES LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U36934WB1951PLC019890

Company & Directors' Information:- B M STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51102TN1976PTC007165

Company & Directors' Information:- J M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U05002UP1952PTC002456

Company & Directors' Information:- L F INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17291UP2015PTC068602

Company & Directors' Information:- L. R. STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27106UP2002PTC026946

Company & Directors' Information:- A K S INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27201WB1946PTC013433

Company & Directors' Information:- V M V INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U26990GJ2013PTC076945

Company & Directors' Information:- S K INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U29248PN1948PLC001948

Company & Directors' Information:- S R STEELS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U27104PB1983PTC005586

Company & Directors' Information:- S P INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U20232AS1980PTC001853

Company & Directors' Information:- M B STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U99999MH1975PTC018595

Company & Directors' Information:- M R STEELS PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27108MH1980PTC022743

Company & Directors' Information:- V N R INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U21090AP2012PTC081525

Company & Directors' Information:- N I STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27209UP1978PTC004654

Company & Directors' Information:- A K INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U51109WB1944PTC011764

Company & Directors' Information:- J M M D STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1989PTC035398

Company & Directors' Information:- K INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U99999KA1946PTC000938

Company & Directors' Information:- G I P INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U52605MH2015PTC263962

Company & Directors' Information:- K. A. STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27100PB2011PTC034822

Company & Directors' Information:- C. L. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27109RJ2014PTC045306

Company & Directors' Information:- R. A. M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17120MH2014PTC254820

Company & Directors' Information:- S. B. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74900PN2012PTC144181

Company & Directors' Information:- A & P INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U36935TG2014PTC095781

Company & Directors' Information:- C & N INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U40200TG2014PTC095187

Company & Directors' Information:- B S B INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45200TG2013PTC088059

Company & Directors' Information:- K S A B INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909WB2012PTC181903

Company & Directors' Information:- S V S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U36100JK2013PTC003808

Company & Directors' Information:- A P R STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27109DL2000PTC104579

Company & Directors' Information:- H A S STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27109DL2004PTC125908

Company & Directors' Information:- R D M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U31100DL2013PTC252294

Company & Directors' Information:- INDUSTRIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U00349KA1947PTC000501

Company & Directors' Information:- A V K INDUSTRIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U52100KA2012PTC066761

Company & Directors' Information:- S V INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U27104WB1960PTC024715

Company & Directors' Information:- J INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U18101OR1960PTC000388

Company & Directors' Information:- A N STEELS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U72100AS1993PTC003848

Company & Directors' Information:- T & M INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Liquidated] CIN = U99999TN1956PLC002904

Company & Directors' Information:- INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U51109BR1946PTC000228

Company & Directors' Information:- K INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Not available for efiling] CIN = U99999MH1946PTC005438

    W.P.C. No. 3699 of 2015, 1159, 1160, 1561 of 2017 with I.A. No. 5506 of 2016

    Decided On, 05 March 2020

    At, High Court of Jharkhand

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN

    For the Petitioners: M/s. Indrajit Sinha, P.A.S. Pati, Bibhas Sinha, Advocates. For the Respondents: Manoj Tandon, AAG, Anshuman Kumar, A.C to AAG, Vinod Kumar Sahu, G.P.-III, Ashish Kumar Thakur, A.C to G.P-III , Navin Kumar, G.P.-IV, Sweta Kumari, A.C to G.P.-IV, Abhijeet Kumar Singh, Shray Mishra, Krishna Murari, Advocates.



Judgment Text


1. As the common question of law is involved in all these writ applications, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common Judgment.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Additional Advocate General for the State, as also the learned counsel for the private respondent in W.P.C No.3699 of 2015. The private respondents in other writ applications have also been noticed and the notices have been validly served on them, but no one appeared for the private respondents in the other three writ applications, in spite of repeated calls.

3. In W.P.(C). No.3699 of 2015, the petitioners have challenged the Award passed by the Jharkhand Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises Facilitation Council (hereinafter referred to as the 'Council') communicated under memo No. 1954 dated 20.07.2015, whereas in other writ applications, the notices dated 31.1.2017 and 15.03.2017 issued by the Council to the petitioner have been challenged by the petitioner, on the sole ground that the constitution of the Council in the State of Jharkhand, was done in contravention of Section 21 of the MSMED Act.

4. According to the petitioner's case, the Council was constituted under Rule 4 of the Jharkhand Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises Facilitation Council Rules, 2007, (hereinafter referred to as the '2007 Rules'), which was not in consonance with Section 21 of the Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the 'MSMED Act'). The contention of the petitioner is that Rule 4 of the 2007 Rules, which prescribes the constitution of the Council to be consisting of not less than five members and not more than nine members, is ultra vires Section 21 of the MSMED Act, which provides that Council shall consist of not less than three members but not more than five members.

5. In order to appreciate the challenge to the constitution of the Council, the relevant provisions of the MSMED Act and 2007 Rules are required to be looked into. Section 21 of the MSMED Act reads as follows:-

"21. Composition of Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council. - (1) the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council shall consist of not less than three but not more than five members to be appointed from amongst the following categories, namely :-

(i) Director of Industries, by whatever name called, or any other officer not below the rank of such Director, in the Department of the State Government having administrative control of the small scale industries or, as the case may be, micro, small and medium enterprises; and

(ii) one or more office-bearers or representatives of associations of micro or small industry or enterprises in the State; and

(iii) one or more representatives of banks and financial institutions lending to micro or small enterprises; or

(iv) one or more persons having special knowledge in the field of industry, finance, law, trade or commerce.

********* "

Rule 4 of the Jharkhand Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises Facilitation Council Rules, 2007 reads as follows:-

“LANGUAGE”

6. Placing Rule 4(1) of the 2007 Rules and Section 21 of the MSMED Act, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that Section 21 of the MSMED Act clearly provides that the Council shall consist of not less than three but not more than five members, but Rule 4(1) of the 2007 Rules provided that the Council shall consist of not less than five and not more than nine members, and in fact, in the State of Jharkhand the Council was also constituted with nine members, which passed the impugned Award and also issued the impugned notices in these writ applications, which are thus, absolutely illegal and void ab initio, and cannot be sustained in the eyes of law, as Rule 4 of the 2007 Rules is ultra vires Section 21 of the MSMED Act and accordingly, any action of such illegally constituted Council shall be void ab initio.

7. It is an admitted fact that 2007 Rules have since been repealed and replaced by Jharkhand Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises Facilitation Council Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the '2017 Rules'), and Rule 4 thereof is now in consonance with Section 21 of the MSMED Act, providing that the Council shall consist of not more than five members from the different categories enumerated under the 2017 Rules, which now reads as follows:-

“LANGUAGE”

********* "

8. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioners have moved this Court directly under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in view of the fact that the impugned Award / Notices are void ab initio, for the fact that they have been passed / issued by a Council which was not competent under the Act to function.

9. Learned counsel submitted that even the de facto doctrine shall not come in the way to support the Award passed and the notices issued by the Council which was not competent under the Act to function, inasmuch as, Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Arbitration Act'), provides the grounds for setting aside the Arbitral Award, and one of the grounds mentioned under Clause (v) of Section 34 (2) of the Arbitration Act for setting aside the award, is that the composition of the arbitral tribunal or the arbitral procedure was not in consonance with the agreement of the parties. It is not in dispute that the Council while doing arbitration, exercises the power under the Arbitration Act, in view of Section 18 (3) of the MSMED Act, which reads as follows :-

"18. Reference to Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council. -

(1) -------------------.

(2) -------------------.

(3) Where the conciliation initiated under sub section (2) is not successful and stands terminated without any settlement between the parties, the Council shall either itself take up the dispute for arbitration or refer it to any institution or center providing alternate dispute resolution services for such arbitration and the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (26 of 1996) shall then apply to the disputes as if the arbitration was in pursuance of an arbitration agreement referred to in sub-section (1) of section 7 of that Act.

********* "

10. In support of his contention that in view of the fact that the constitution of the Council was against the provisions of the MSMED Act, the Award passed and the notices issued by the Council shall not be protected by the defacto doctrine, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon a decision of the Court of Appeal (England and Wales), in Sumukan Ltd. Vs. Commonwealth Secretariat, reported in (2008) Bus LR 858, wherein where, the claimant had complained that the arbitral tribunal lacked substantive jurisdiction because it had not been properly constituted, the Court of Appeal had posed a question - "Does the de facto concept apply ?" And the answer given by Waller LJ., was - "I do not think it does in the arbitration context." Sedley LJ., answered the question in the following terms :-

"50. I respectfully agree with Waller I.J. that there is no room in the arbitration field for the common law doctrine which in some circumstances validates the acts of an apparent and reputed judge.

51. The de facto doctrine is an escape from the ordinary consequences of a defective or non-existent judicial appointment, adopted by the common law in the interests of legal certainty. -----------."

Sir Anthony Clarke MR, agreeing with both Waller and Sedley LJ., answered the question in the following terms :-

"61. -----------------. In my opinion, it follows that, subject to section 73 of the 1996 Act, the panel lacked substantive jurisdiction. Before turning to section 73 I should add that I agree with both Waller and Sedley LJ that, for the reasons they give, there is no room for the concept of the de-facto arbitrator in the context of a private arbitration like this."

11. Placing reliance on this decision, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in the present cases also, in view of Section 34(2)(v) of the Arbitration Act, there being an express provision for setting aside the arbitral award if the composition of the arbitral tribunal was not proper, the impugned Award communicated to the petitioner under memo No. 1954 dated 20.07.2015 and the notices dated 31.01.2017 and 15.03.2017 cannot be sustained in the eyes of law, on this score alone and without looking into their merits.

12. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer and has taken the preliminary objection to the maintainability of these writ applications, submitting that in view of Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, there is an alternative remedy provided to the petitioners to move before the Commercial Court to challenge the Award and accordingly, the writ applications are not maintainable.

13. It is also submitted by the learned AAG that the 2007 Rules have since been repealed and have been substituted by the 2017 Rules framed in the year 2017, and Rule 4 in the 2017 Rules is now in consonance with Section 21 of the MSMED Act. Learned AAG, thus, submits that now, there is no question to challenge the validity or vires of the 2007 Rules, since the Rules themselves have been repealed by the State Government. Accordingly, the writ applications are not maintainable even on this score.

14. Learned AAG has also submitted that even otherwise, the impugned Award or the notices cannot be challenged being void ab initio, inasmuch as, there were nine members of the Council, and the minimum requirement of the number of members as provided under Section 21 of the MSMED Act is already fulfilled.

15. In support of his contention, learned Additional Advocate General has placed reliance upon the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Power Machines India Ltd. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors., reported in (2017) 7 SCC 323, wherein the law has been laid down as follows:-

"15. -----------. The objective of the Act is to provide protection to the micro, small and medium enterprises and to facilitate their development. In order to carry out the objective of the Act, speedy recovery mechanism has been provided under Rule 5 of the Rules by providing that the amount awarded in an arbitral award can be recovered as arrears of land revenue. No doubt that Rule 5 is inconsistent with the provisions contained in Section 36(1) of the 1996 Act which provides recovery mechanism under Order 21 CPC as a decree, but, in the matter of providing such remedies, it is open to legislate different remedies which may be inconsistent. It is a question of electing a remedy. Election of a remedy for recovery of the amount would depend upon the choice of the award-holder. Both the provisions i.e. Section 36 of the 1996 Act as well as Rule 5 of the 2006 Rules intend to recover the amount though by different procedures. Intendment of provisions is same. There is no question of any prejudice being caused to the judgment-debtor."(Emphasis supplied).

16. Placing reliance on this decision, learned AAG has submitted that even in the present case also, no difference was going to be made, nor any prejudice is caused to the writ petitioner even if the Award was passed by nine members of the Council, though the MSMED Act provided the maximum number to be five. Learned AAG accordingly, submitted that there is no scope of challenge of the impugned Award on the ground that the constitution of the Council was in teeth of Section 21 of the MSMED Act and accordingly, the only remedy left to the petitioner was to challenge the Award before the Commercial Court, under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act. According to learned AAG, there is no scope to challenge the notices at this stage, as the challenge to the validity or vires of the 2007 Rules, is no more available to the petitioner, as the 2007 Rules have already been repealed, and no prejudice is caused to the petitioner only by issuing the notices.

17. Learned Additional Advocate General has also placed reliance on a decision of the Hon'ble Single Judge of this Court in M/s. G.P.T. Infraprojects Limited & Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors., (W.P.(C). No. 06 of 2014, decided on 03.03.2016) wherein, it was held that even the question relating to the composition of the arbitral tribunal or failure to follow arbitral procedure are specifically available for challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, and in view of Section 18(3) of the MSMED Act, since the provisions of the Arbitration Act apply to the dispute as if the arbitration was in pursuance of an arbitration agreement, there was no reason as to why the petitioners should not have availed the statutory remedy available under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, and the Writ Court had not entertained the writ application.

18. Learned Additional Advocate General has also invited our attention towards Section 5 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which reads as follows :

"5. Extent of judicial intervention. - Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, in matters governed by this part, no judicial authority shall intervene except where so provided in this Part."

19. Learned Additional Advocate General accordingly, concluded that these writ applications are not at all maintainable.

20. Learned counsel for the respondent No.4 in W.P.C. No.3699 of 2015, has also more or less adopted the arguments of the learned AAG, and has further augmented his arguments, drawing our attention towards the decision of the Constitution Bench of the Hon'ble Apex Court in SBP & Co. Vs. Patel Engineering Ltd. & Anr., reported in (2005) 8 SCC 618, wherein the majority view of the Constitution Bench of the Hon'ble Apex Court, laid down the law as follows:-

"45. It is seen that some High Courts have proceeded on the basis that any order passed by an Arbitral Tribunal during arbitration, would be capable of being challenged under Article 226 or 227 of the Constitution. We see no warrant for such an approach. Section 37 makes certain orders of the Arbitral Tribunal appealable. Under Section 34, the aggrieved party has an avenue for ventilating its grievances against the award including any in-between orders that might have been passed by the Arbitral Tribunal acting under Section 16 of the Act. The party aggrieved by any order of the Arbitral Tribunal, unless has a right of appeal under Section 37 of the Act, has to wait until the award is passed by the Tribunal. This appears to be the scheme of the Act. The Arbitral Tribunal is, after all, a creature of a contract between the parties, the arbitration agreement, even though, if the occasion arises, the Chief Justice may constitute it based on the contract between the parties. But that would not alter the status of the Arbitral Tribunal. It will still be a forum chosen by the parties by agreement. We, therefore, disapprove of the stand adopted by some of the High Courts that any order passed by the Arbitral Tribunal is capable of being corrected by the High Court under Article 226 or 227 of the Constitution. Such an intervention by the High Courts is not permissible.

*********

47. We, therefore, sum up our conclusions as follows:

(i) to (v) -----------------.

(vi) Once the matter reaches the Arbitral Tribunal or the sole arbitrator, the High Court would not interfere with the orders passed by the arbitrator or the Arbitral Tribunal during the course of the arbitration proceedings and the parties could approach the Court only in terms of Section 37 of the Act or in terms of Section 34 of the Act.

********* "

21. Learned counsel for the private respondent has also placed reliance upon the decision of one unreported decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in M/s Sterling Industries Vs. Jayprakash Associates Ltd. & Ors., (Civil Appeal Nos. 7117-7118 of 2017, decided on 10th July 2019), wherein relying upon the decision in the SBP & Co.'s case (supra), the law has been reiterated by the Hon'ble Apex Court.

22. In reply, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Whirlpool Corporation Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumbai &Ors., reported in (1998) 8 SCC 1, laying down the law as follows :-

"15. Under Article 226 of the Constitution, the High Court, having regard to the facts of the case, has a discretion to entertain or not to entertain a writ petition. But the High Court has imposed upon itself certain restrictions one of which is that if an effective and efficacious remedy is available, the High Court would not normally exercise its jurisdiction. But the alternative remedy has been consistently held by this Court not to operate as a bar in at least three contingencies, namely, where the writ petition has been filed for the enforcement of any of the Fundamental Rights or where there has been a violation of the principle of natural justice or where the order or proceedings are wholly without jurisdiction or the vires of an Act is challenged. --------------------."

(Emphasis supplied).

23. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also placed reliance upon the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in State of Tripura Vs. Manoranjan Chakraborty & Ors., reported in (2001) 10 SCC 740, wherein the law has been reiterated by the Hon'ble Apex Court, holding that if gross injustice is done and it can be shown that for good reason the Court should interfere, then notwithstanding the alternative remedy which may be available by way of an appeal, the Writ Court can in an appropriate case exercise its jurisdiction to do substantive justice. Learned counsel for the petitioner accordingly, reiterated his submission that in view of the fact that the constitution of the Council was itself ultra-vires Section 21 of the MSMED Act, the alternative remedy cannot be taken as a bar for filing the present writ applications, as in such a case, the merits of the impugned action need not be looked into.

24. Having heard the learned counsels for the parties and upon going through the record, we find that Section 21 of the MSMED Act is clear and unambiguous in its terms, when it says that the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council shall consist of not less than three but not more than five members, to be appointed amongst the categories detailed under that section. There is no scope of any inclusion of more members in the Council as per Section 21 of the Act. Rule 4 of the 2007 Rules was in clear contravention of Section 21 of the MSMED Act, when it provided for the constitution of the Council with not less than five and not more than nine members in the Council, and in fact, pursuant to the said Rule, the Council was even constituted by the State Government with nine members. Clearly the constitution of the said Council was in accordance with Rule 4 of the 2007 Rules, whereas in clear contravention of Section 21 of the MSMED Act. In case, the petitioner is forced to challenge the impugned Award before the Commercial Court, under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, the only answer that is likely to come from the Commercial Court is that the constitution of the Council was in accordance with the Rules, which was binding on the Commercial Court, and as there is no scope for the Commercial Court to entertain the appeal on the ground that Rule 4 of 2007 Rules was ultra-vires Section 21 of the Act. Accordingly, no effective and efficacious remedy was available to the petitioner before the Commercial Court. Indeed there is no alternative remedy to the petitioner to challenge the notices issued by the Council, as no appeal is provided against the notice issued by the Council, either under the MSMED Act, or under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act. In that view of the matter, we are of the considered view that the arguments of the learned Additional Advocate General and the learned counsel for the private respondent that it was open for the petitioner to challenge the impugned Award before the Commercial Court, though such remedy is available, but it was not effective and efficacious in the sense that the Commercial Court could not look into the virus of the Rules.

25. In Whirlpool Corporation's case (supra), the Hon'ble Apex Courthas placed reliance on its earlier decisions, including the one in Calcutta Discount Co. Ltd. v. ITO, Companies Distt. I, reported in AIR 1961 SC 372, and has held as follows:-

"19. Another Constitution Bench decision in Calcutta Discount Co. Ltd. v. ITO, Companies Distt. I laid down:

“Though the writ of prohibition or certiorari will not issue against an executive authority, the High Courts have power to issue in a fit case an order prohibiting an executive authority from acting without jurisdiction. Where such action of an executive authority acting without jurisdiction subjects or is likely to subject a person to lengthy proceedings and unnecessary harassment, the High Courts will issue appropriate orders or directions to prevent such consequences. Writ of certiorari and prohibition can issue against

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

the Income Tax Officer acting without jurisdiction under Section 34, Income Tax Act.” 20. Much water has since flown under the bridge, but there has been no corrosive effect on these decisions which, though old, continue to hold the field with the result that law as to the jurisdiction of the High Court in entertaining a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, in spite of the alternative statutory remedies, is not affected, specially in a case where the authority against whom the writ is filed is shown to have had no jurisdiction or had purported to usurp jurisdiction without any legal foundation." (Emphasis supplied). 26. In view of the settled law on the subject, we find that in spite of the specific provision of appeal under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, these writ applications are quite maintainable, in view of the fact that the impugned Award / notices are challenged on the ground of competency of the Council, constitution of which is ultra-vires Section 21 of the MSMED Act. The fact that Rule 4 of 2017 Rules was ultra-virus the MSMED Act, is not only the contention of the petitioner, rather it is well acknowledged even by the State Government, inasmuch as the State Government realized its mistake and has repealed the 2007 Rules, bringing fresh 2017 Rules, bringing new Rule 4 therein, which is in consonance with Section 21 of the MSMED Act. 27. In that view of the matter, we are of the considered view that these writ applications of the petitioner cannot be thrown away on the ground of availability of the alternative remedy under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, as the petitioner had no effective and efficacious remedy before the Commercial Court. Accordingly, the impugned Award communicated to the petitioners under Memo No. 1954 dated 20.07.2015, as contained in Annexure-11 to the W.P.C. No.3699 of 2015 and the notices dated 31.01.2017 and 15.03.2017, as contained in Annexures-1 and 2 in the other three writ applications, are hereby, quashed. 28. The liberty is given to the Council, constituted under the 2017 Rules, to issue fresh notices to the petitioner and also to adjudicate the matter afresh by passing a fresh Award in accordance with law. 29. All these writ applications are accordingly, allowed with the directions as above. The pending Interlocutory Application also stands disposed of.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

10-09-2020 United India Insurance Company Ltd., Rajasthan Versus M/s. Radhika Oil Industries, Rajasthan National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
01-09-2020 MS Industries & Spirits (P) Ltd. Versus M/s. Allied Blenders & Distillers Pvt Ltd. High Court of for the State of Telangana
31-08-2020 M/s. AAF India Private Limited, Rep. by its Authorised Signatory Jagruti Mursenia Versus M/s. KBR Industries, Represented by its Partner High Court of Karnataka
25-08-2020 The Deputy General Manager, Small Industries Development Bank of India, Coimbatore & Another Versus M/s. Annamalai Hotels (Pvt.) Ltd., Rep.by its Managing Director, P. Velusamy, Coimbatore High Court of Judicature at Madras
20-08-2020 K. Manikkan, Railway Liason Officer, Malabar Cements Limited, Walayar Versus The State of Kerala, Represented by The Principal Secretary, Industries (H) Department, Thiruvananthapuram & Others High Court of Kerala
19-08-2020 L. Ahmed Abdul Razack Versus State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by Secretary to Government, Industries Department, Chennai & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
17-08-2020 M/S Anjaneya Bisanpur Agro Industries Pvt. Ltd Versus Dilawar Singh Rawat & Another High Court of Delhi
06-08-2020 Rajiv Bal Versus Harrison Industries, New Delhi & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
04-08-2020 ECOM Gill Coffee Trading Private Limited, Rep. by its Authorised Signatory Shailendra Singh Versus M/s. Vittal Cashew Industries, Represented by its Partner H. Ganesh Kamath & Others High Court of Karnataka
04-08-2020 R.V. Granites, rep. by its Managing Partner S. Padmavathi Versus State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Principal Secretary, Industries & Commerce (Mines.II) Department Amaravati & Others High Court of Andhra Pradesh
28-07-2020 NSL Sugars Limited, Rep. by its Assistant General Manager (Liason) H.V. Amarnath Versus State of Karnataka, Rep. by its Secretary (Sugar) Commerce & Industries Department, Bangalore & Others High Court of Karnataka
23-07-2020 Aqua Pump Industries, Rep by its Managing Partner Ramaswamy Kumaravelu & Another Versus N. Raju, Trading as S.M.Agriculture & Electronics, Bangalore High Court of Judicature at Madras
22-07-2020 Director of Income Tax-II (International Taxation) New Delhi & Another Versus M/s. Samsung Heavy Industries Co. Ltd. Supreme Court of India
20-07-2020 National Insurance Co. Ltd. Through National Legal Vertical, New Delhi Versus M/s. Krishna Spico Industries Pvt. Ltd., Ghaziabad & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
16-07-2020 N.M. Chandrashekar Versus The State of Karnataka, by its Secretary Department of Commerce & Industries, Bangalore & Others High Court of Karnataka
14-07-2020 M/s. Terracon Projects, Represented by its Proprietor S.V. Babu Versus The State of Karnataka, Represented by its Principal Secretary Department of Commerce & Industries, Bengaluru & Others High Court of Karnataka
14-07-2020 M/s. Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, Rep. by its Authorised representative Goregaon Mumbai Versus Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
09-07-2020 M/s. Durga Fabrication Works, Represented by its Proprietor, Prakash Ramu Rathod Versus The State of Karnataka, Represented By Its Secretary, Department of Industries & Commerce, Bengaluru & Others High Court of Karnataka
19-06-2020 M/s. Virgo Industries (Engineers) Pvt Ltd., Rep. By its Director Reethamma Joseph & Another Versus M/s. Venturetech Solutions Pvt Ltd., Rep. By its Director N. Mal Reddy High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-06-2020 M/s. Integrated Finance Company Limited rep. by its Legal Officer and duly constituted Attorney A. Hema Jothi Versus Garware Marine Industries Limited Registered Office at Chander Mukhi High Court of Judicature at Madras
17-06-2020 D.D. Industries Ltd., New Delhi Versus Jasmeet Walia & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
11-06-2020 Prakash Industries Limited. Versus Bengal Energy Limited. & Another High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
01-06-2020 Khaleed Pasha & Others Versus State of Karnataka, Represented by its Secretary Department of Commerce & Industries (MSME, Mines & Textile), Bangalore & Others High Court of Karnataka
26-05-2020 Tips Industries Ltd. Versus Entertainment Network (Kindia) Ltd. & Another High Court of Judicature at Bombay
26-05-2020 Guru Nanak Industries, Faridabad & Another Versus Amar Singh (Dead) Through Lrs. Supreme Court of India
20-05-2020 M/s. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, Represented by its Authorised Signatory, Nilesh Mahendra Kumar Gandhi & Another Versus The Assistant Commercial Tax Officer (Check of Accounts) & Others High Court of Andhra Pradesh
19-05-2020 M/s. Bharat Steels represented by its Proprietor Gulraj M. Jain Versus The Commercial Tax Officer, Broadway Assessment Circle High Court of Judicature at Madras
12-05-2020 Spentex Industries Ltd Versus Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP High Court of Delhi
05-05-2020 Mohamed Tanveer Versus The State of Karnataka by Addl. Chief Secretary Department of Commerce & Industries, Bengaluru & Others High Court of Karnataka
01-05-2020 Agricola Enterprises Ltd. & Another Versus Ministry for Primary Industries Court of Appeal of New Zealand
01-05-2020 Electrosteel Steels Limited, having its Registered Office at Ranchi, Principal place of Business at Siyaljori, District Bokaro Versus The State of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner of State Tax, Ranchi & Others High Court of Jharkhand
30-04-2020 Natural Sugar and Allied Industries Limited & Others Versus The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary for Co-operation, Marketing & Textile Department, Mantralaya & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
27-04-2020 Bihar State Electricity Board & Others Versus M/s. Iceberg Industries Ltd. & Others Supreme Court of India
24-04-2020 Union of India & Others Versus Exide Industries Limited & Another Supreme Court of India
21-04-2020 Lakshmi Sriniavasa Rice Mills, Rep. by its Partners, K. Kallappa Versus Lakshmi Srinivas Industries, Rep. by its Partners, T. Nageswara Rao, Raichur & Others High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench OF Kalaburagi
20-03-2020 M/s. CJP Industries, Represented by its Managing Partner S. Julius Versus Amitha Bishnoi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
18-03-2020 West Bengal Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd. & Others Versus M/s. Sona Promoters Pvt. Ltd. & Others Supreme Court of India
18-03-2020 M/s. Minar Castings Pvt. Ltd., (Formerly Hadeed Steels Pvt. Ltd.), Kanjikode, Palakkad, Represented by Its Managing Director, A. Mohammed Shafi Versus State of Kerala, Represented by Its Secretary, Taxes Department, Govt. Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram High Court of Kerala
17-03-2020 A Marine Industries Munambam, Ernakulam, Represented by Its Proprietor, P.T. Francis & Others Versus UCO Bank, Represented by The Chief Manager, Ernakulam & Another High Court of Kerala
17-03-2020 S. Vaikundarajan Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep., by its Principal Secretary to Government, Industries (MMD.2) Department, Chennai Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
16-03-2020 Peps Industries Private Limited Versus Kurlon Limited High Court of Delhi
12-03-2020 Sai Electromech Industries, A Sole Proprietary Concern rep.by Its Proprietor Umangkumar Joshi Versus Sicagen India Limited, Rep.by its Authorised Signatory S. Mahadevan High Court of Judicature at Madras
11-03-2020 Agrocel Industries Pvt. Ltd. Versus United India Insurance Company Ltd. High Court of Judicature at Bombay
06-03-2020 Ballarpur Industries Limited & Another V/S The State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Department of Forests, Mantralaya In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
06-03-2020 M/s. Connectwell Industries Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India Through Ministry of Finance & Others Supreme Court of India
04-03-2020 M/s. Ramco Industries Ltd., Rajapalaym Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Madurai High Court of Judicature at Madras
28-02-2020 Super Cassettes Industries Pvt. Ltd Versus Prime Cable Network & Another High Court of Delhi
28-02-2020 Bank of India V/S M/s. Brindavan Agro Industries Pvt. Ltd Supreme Court of India
28-02-2020 Trans Asian Industries Exposition Pvt. Ltd. & Others Versus Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd & Another High Court of Delhi
26-02-2020 Morgan Securities & Credits Pvt. Ltd. Versus Videocon Industries Ltd. (Through) High Court of Delhi
25-02-2020 Eurotex Industries and Exports Ltd. Versus Additional Commissioner of Labour-cum-Specified Authority & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
25-02-2020 Kamal Encon Industries Limited Through its Authorized Representative Versus Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission Through its Secretary World Trade Centre, Mumbai & Others Appellate Tribunal for Electricity Appellate Jurisdiction
24-02-2020 Panch Tatva Promoters Pvt. Ltd. Versus GPT Steel Industries Ltd. (Through Resolution Professional) & Others National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
24-02-2020 S. Suresh Versus The Management Exide Industries Ltd., Madurai & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
20-02-2020 M/s Century Rayon (A division of Century Textile & Industries Ltd.), Maharashtra V/S Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., Through its, Chief Engineer (Commercial), Maharashtra And Others Appellate Tribunal for Electricity Appellate Jurisdiction
20-02-2020 Asian Food Industries Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
18-02-2020 ITC Limited, Chennai, Rep. by its Constituted Attorney, V.M. Rajasekharan Versus Shree Devi Match Industries, Gudiyattam & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
18-02-2020 Clay Craft (India) Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Director, Rajasthan & Others Versus Rajasthan Small Industries Corporation Limited (Institution of Rajasthan Government) Through Managing Director, Ugyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
17-02-2020 Reliance Industries Ltd. Versus Gail (India) Ltd. High Court of Delhi
14-02-2020 The Superintending Engineer, General Construction, TANTRANSCO Ltd., Tatabad, Coimbatore & Another Versus Micro Small Enterprises Facilitation Council and Director of Industries and Commerce, Represented by its Chairman, Guindy & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
10-02-2020 M/s. Tanfac Industries Limited, Rep. by its Secretary G. Balasubramanian Versus M/s. Orichem Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
07-02-2020 Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited V/S Laxmi Balaji Industries and Others. Debts Recovery Tribunal Hyderabad
07-02-2020 M/s. S.K.J. Coke Industries Ltd. & Another Versus Coal India Ltd. & Others Supreme Court of India
06-02-2020 K. Arumugham, Prop. Seetha Industries, Arakandanalu, Villupuram V/S The Secretary to Government, Department of Commercial Taxes & Religious Endowments, Chennai And Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-02-2020 Andhra Bank V/S Suguna Industries Debts Recovery Tribunal Hyderabad
06-02-2020 HDFC Bank Ltd. V/S JNK Electrical Industries Private Limited and Others. Debts Recovery Tribunal Delhi
05-02-2020 P. Krishnan Versus The Deputy Director of Industries and Commerce (Industrial Co-operatives)/(District Registrar of Industrial Co-op), Guindy, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
05-02-2020 Sheo Shakti Cement Industries, Hazaribagh Versus State of Jharkhand High Court of Jharkhand
05-02-2020 B.H. Srinivasa Murthy Versus State of Karnataka, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Department of Commerce & Industries, Bengaluru & Others High Court of Karnataka
05-02-2020 D. Vasantha Versus The State of Karnataka, Represented by its Secretary Commerce & Industries Department (MSME & Mines), Bengaluru & Others High Court of Karnataka
04-02-2020 M/s. K.T.V. Health Food Private Limited Versus The Principal Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu Industries Department Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
03-02-2020 Jai Balaji Industries Ltd. & Another Versus Punjab National Bank & Another High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
01-02-2020 Ishwar Oil Industries and Others. V/S The Authorized Officer, Dena Bank and Others. Debts Recovery Tribunal Ahmedabad
31-01-2020 Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax V/S Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Supreme Court of India
29-01-2020 Dhivya Steels, Rep. by its Prop. R. Shiva Shankar Versus The Controller of Stores, Southern Railway, Perambur, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
29-01-2020 Vimal Kumar Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary/Industries Department, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
28-01-2020 New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Through its Authorised Signatory, New Delhi Versus M/s. Durga Bricks Industries, West Bengal & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
28-01-2020 M/s. Elgi Electric & Industries Limited, Rep. by General Manager, Coimbatore Versus The Assistant Commissioner (CT) (FAC), Trichy Road Assessment Circle, Coimbatore High Court of Judicature at Madras
28-01-2020 Century Rayon (A Division of Century Textiles and Industries Limited), Maharashtra Versus The Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission Through its Secretary, Mumbai & Others Appellate Tribunal for Electricity Appellate Jurisdiction
27-01-2020 Vanessa Crasto Versus Central Public Information Officer Central Cottage Industries Corporation of India Ltd. Central Information Commission
27-01-2020 The Managing Director, State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Ltd., (SIPCOT), Egmore, Chennai Versus The Special Tahsildar, SIPCOT Unit Sriprumbudur & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-01-2020 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 Versus Vilson Particle Board Industries Ltd. High Court of Judicature at Bombay
24-01-2020 M/s. NMR Industries, Rep. by its Proprietor M. Raja, Chennai Versus The Managing Director, The TIIC Ltd., Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
22-01-2020 Morgan Securities & Credits Pvt. Ltd. Versus Resolution Professional of Videocon Industries Ltd. & Another National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
21-01-2020 M/s. Slar Machines & Methods, Rep. by its Partner, V. Saravanabhavan Versus The Branch Manager, National Small Industries Corporation Limited, Hosur & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
20-01-2020 Maa Tarini Industries Ltd. & Another Versus PEC Limited High Court of Delhi
14-01-2020 M/s. Vijeta Projects & Industries Limited Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
10-01-2020 M/s. Singapore Reality Private Limited, Represented by its Director having office at T. Nagar, Chennai also at Siruseri Versus The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Industries Department & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
10-01-2020 Nandkishore Shravan Ahirrao Versus Kosan Industries (P)Ltd. Supreme Court of India
09-01-2020 Viju M. Ittoop Versus State of Kerala, Represented by Secretary To Government, Industries Department, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram & Others High Court of Kerala
09-01-2020 Chowgule Industries Pvt. Ltd. Versus Krishna Shrikant Kumbhar & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
07-01-2020 M/s. Maa Bhadrakali Coke Industries (Pvt.) Ltd., Dhanbad Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others High Court of Jharkhand
07-01-2020 M/s. M.A Steels Pvt. Ltd. Kanjikode, Palakkad (Kerala) & Others Versus C.C.,C.E.& S.T-Calicut Customs Excise amp Service Tax Appellate Tribunal South Zonal Bench At Bangalore
07-01-2020 M.A. Steels Pvt. Ltd. and Others V/S C.C., C.E. & S.T., Calicut Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal South Zonal Bench At Bangalore
06-01-2020 M/s. Refex Industries Limited, Kanchipuram District & Others V/S The Assistant Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
03-01-2020 P. Dhanalakshmi & Another Versus The Secretary to Government, Industries Department, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
03-01-2020 Bengal Hammer Industries P. Ltd V/S Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolkata-II, Commissionerate Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal East Zonal Bench Bench, Kolkata
02-01-2020 M/s. Jai Jawala Steels Pvt. Ltd. Versus The State Bank of India Another High Court of Himachal Pradesh
02-01-2020 The Commissioner of Income Tax Versus Zuari Industries Ltd. In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
02-01-2020 Allahabad Bank V/S Dobhi Agro Industries and Others. Debts Recovery Tribunal Patna