for example: TATA AIG

  for example: Indian Contract Act

  for example: Ratan Tata

  for example: Negotiable Instruments Act

w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Dr. Vijay Kumar Agarwal v/s State


Company & Directors' Information:- AGARWAL & AGARWAL PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27106WB1950PTC026266

Company & Directors' Information:- AGARWAL & AGARWAL PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27106DL1950PTC332098

Company & Directors' Information:- A. KUMAR AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U19201UP1995PTC018833

Company & Directors' Information:- VIJAY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U25199DL1998PTC096860

Company & Directors' Information:- AGARWAL CO LTD [Active] CIN = U74140WB1950PLC018969

Company & Directors' Information:- S KUMAR & CO PVT LTD [Not available for efiling] CIN = U51909WB1946PTC014540

Company & Directors' Information:- S KUMAR AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Converted to LLP] CIN = U45203DL1964PTC117149

Company & Directors' Information:- KUMAR (INDIA) PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U51909WB1986PTC041038

    Civil Spl. Appeal (W) No. 417 of 2000

    Decided On, 07 July 2000

    At, High Court of Rajasthan

    By, THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MADAN

    For the Appellant: S.P. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 & R3, Narendra Jain, Advocate.



Judgment Text

Dr. AR. Lakshmanan, C.J.

1. This appeal is directed against the order of rejection in the stay application filed by the appellant herein in the writ petition. The writ petition was filed with the following prayers :-

"(i) declare the action of the respondents in not providing reservation to the disabled persons while making selections for PG Courses, as bad in law;

(ii) further by writ of mandamus the respondents be directed to implement the Act of 1955 and the recommendations given by the Commissioner Disabilities and provide at least 3% reservations to the physically handicapped persons in the Pre PG Entrance Examination 2000 for admission to MD/MS Diploma Courses;

(iii) the respondents be further directed to seek option from the petitioner for PG seats for the various faculties and grant him admission as per his merit vis-a-vis other physically handicapped persons;

(iv) direct the respondents to prepare a separate merit for physically handicapped persons in the Pre PG Entrance Examination, 2000;

(v) any other order or direction as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case may also be passed in favour of humble petitioner;

(vi) Cost of this writ petition may also be awarded in favour of humble petitioner".

2. Along with the writ petition, the appellant filed a stay application requesting this Court to direct the respondents to keep at least one post in the PG Course vacant for physically handicapped persons or in the alternative direct the respondents to keep 3% of seats in the Pre PG Course reserved for physically handicapped persons and also further direct the respondents to provisionally prepare a separate merit list for physically handicapped persons, who have applied for the Pre PG Entrance Test, 2000. The said application was rejected by Justice A. K. Parihar against which the present Special Appeal was filed. A Division Bench of this Court on 19-4-2000 issued notices to the respondents to show cause as to why this appeal should not be admitted and disposed of at this stage. Notice was ordered returnable by six weeks. The Division Bench on the same day issued a direction in stay application No. 1767/2000 in the following terms :-

"19-4-2000

Hon. V. S. Kokje, Actg. C. J.

Hon. P. P. Naolekar, J.

Mr. S. P. Sharma, for applicant

Issue Notice, returnable by six weeks.

Meanwhile one seat be kept vacant in the Pre-PG Course 2000 so that in case the applicant succeeds he shall have a chance to compete under the quota of physically handicapped persons.

Sd/

Sd/"

3. We heard Mr. S. P. Sharma learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Narendra Jain learned counsel for respondents Nos. 1 and 3. Learned counsel for respondents Nos. 1 and 3 raised a preliminary objection in regard to the maintainability of the writ appeal. According to the learned counsel for respondents Nos. 1 and 3, both the stay applications are liable to be dismissed on the ground that the main special appeal itself is not maintainable in the facts and circumstances of the present case as it is directed against an interlocutory order dated 7-4-2000 passed by the learned single Judge. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for respondents Nos. 1 and 3 that the State has already filed a detailed reply to the writ petition and therefore, the writ petition itself may be directed to be disposed of at an early date. In support of his contention learned counsel for respondents Nos. 1 and 3 invited our attention to Sec. 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949, which reads thus :-

"18. Appeal to the High Court from judgment of Judges of the Court :- (1) An appeal shall lie to the High Court from the judgment (not being a judgment passed in the exercise of appellate jurisdiction in respect of a decree or order made in the exercise of appellate jurisdiction by a Court subject to the superintendence of the High Court and not being an order made in the exercise of revisional jurisdiction and not being a sentence or order passed or made in the exercise of the power of superintendence under Section 43 or in the exercise of criminal jurisdiction) of one Judge of the High Court.

(2) Notwithstanding anything hereinbefore provided, an apeal shall lie to the High Court from a judgment of one Judge of the High Court made in the exercise of appellate jurisdiction in respect of a decree or order made in the exercise of appellate jurisdiction by a Court subject to the superintendence of the High Court where the Judge who passed the judgment declares that the case is a fit one for appeal."

4. Learned counsel for respondents Nos. 1 and 3 has also cited two decisions of this Court rendered by two Division Benches the first case is reported in 1997 (3) Raj LW 1757 : (AIR 1988 Raj 216) (Firm Swaroop Singh Sher Singh v. Mohan Lal). While considering the scope of Section 18, the Division Bench held that the special appeal is not maintainable if the impugned order is only a Order under Order 45, Rule 13, C. P. C. and dismissed the special appeal. The Bench also held that an order rejecting an application under Order 45, Rule 13, C. P. C. is not a Judgment and therefore, the special appeal is not maintainable. The above judgment was rendered by the Division Bench comprising of Hon'ble V. S. Kokje and Hon'ble Arun Madan, JJ.

5. Another Division Bench of this Court comprising of Hon'ble C. M. Lodha and Hon'ble M. C. Jain, JJ. also in an identical matter (AIR 1980 Raj 182) held that an order vacating a previous stay order does not determine any rights of parties nor determines any points of controversy between the parties and that the stay order does not amount to a 'Judgment' and no appeal lies against that order. We respectfully agree with the opinion expressed by the above two Division Benches. As pointed out earlier, the prayer in the stay petition and the prayer in the main writ petition are one and the same. Since the writ petition is pending, the points raised by the writ petitioner can be considered and decided only in the main writ petition. In our opinion, the learned single Judge has rightly rejected the stay application.

6. The submission made by the learned counsel for respondents Nos. 1 and 3 in regard to the interim direction that one seat be kept vacant in the Pre PG Course, 2000 by the Division Bench also merit acceptance . According to the learned counsel when the appeal itself is not maintainable, no interim order can be issued. There is merit and substance in the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for respondents Nos. 1 and 3. We, therefore, dismiss the appeal on the ground of maintainability and request the learned single Judge to take this matt

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

er on priority basis and dispose of the same within one month from today. 7. The Registry is directed to list the case before the concerned single Judge for final disposal. The points raised by both the parties in the writ petition is left open to be urged and argued before the learned single Judge. 8. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission from this Court to file another stay petition. We are not expressing any opinion on this request. It is open to the learned counsel for the appellant to move to the learned single Judge for further directions, if he so desires. Both the learned counsel shall be at liberty to mention before the learned single Judge for fixing a date for hearing of the writ petition.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

21-01-2020 Mithilesh Kumar Jha Versus State of Bihar & Others High Court of Judicature at Patna
21-01-2020 Deepak Agarwal & Another Versus Three C Shelters Pvt. Ltd., Delhi & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
21-01-2020 Nirmal Kumar Parsan & Others Versus Commissioner of Commercial Taxes & Others Supreme Court of India
21-01-2020 Dalip Kumar Versus Pawan Kumar High Court of Delhi
20-01-2020 Lalitha Versus Saseendra Kumar & Another High Court of Kerala
20-01-2020 Pawan Kumar Gupta Versus State of NCT of Delhi Supreme Court of India
20-01-2020 Manoj Kumar Chowdhury Versus State of West Bengal & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
20-01-2020 Rajiv Kumar Bhagat @ Raja Late Chandrasekhar Bhagat Versus State of Bihar High Court of Judicature at Patna
18-01-2020 Sanjay Kumar Chaubey Versus State of Bihar & Others High Court of Judicature at Patna
17-01-2020 Kaish Impex Private Limited (Through its Director – Deepak Kumar Goyal) Versus The Union of India, through the Secretary, Department of Legal Affairs, Ministry of Law & Justice, Branch Secretariat & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
16-01-2020 Rajendra Kumar Verma & Another Versus Dolly Rani Bag & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
15-01-2020 Raj Kumar Seth Versus Pawan Kumar Seth & Another High Court of Delhi
15-01-2020 New Delhi Municipal Council Versus Vijay Kumar Sharma High Court of Delhi
14-01-2020 The State of Maharashtra Versus Vijay Dnyandeo Chaugule & Another High Court of Judicature at Bombay
14-01-2020 Haresh Kumar Versus State of Karnataka, Represented by its Sub-Inspector of Police, Bengaluru & Another High Court of Karnataka
14-01-2020 Padum Kumar Versus State of Uttar Pradesh Supreme Court of India
14-01-2020 Ashok Kumar Tiwari Versus State Of U.P. & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
14-01-2020 Agriculture Insurance Company of India Limited, Uttarakhand Versus Yashwant Kumar & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
13-01-2020 National Commission for Protection of Child Rights & Others Versus Dr. Rajesh Kumar & Others Supreme Court of India
13-01-2020 Anil Kumar Shukla & Another Versus Bipin Bihari Shukla (died) & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
13-01-2020 Delhi Subordinate Service Selection Board (DSSSB) & Others Versus Puneet Kumar & Others High Court of Delhi
13-01-2020 M/s. Fun World & Resorts (India) Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Represented By Its Managing Director, Vinod Kumar Sabharwal Versus K.K. Nimil, Proprietor, M/s. Niel Entertainment, Palarivattom, Ernakulam High Court of Kerala
10-01-2020 United India Insurance Co. Ltd., New Delhi Versus Urmila Agarwal & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
10-01-2020 Post Master, Post Office, Manimajra Versus Ripan Kumar National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
09-01-2020 State of U.P. Versus Rajiv Kumar Sonkar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
09-01-2020 Kranti Kumar Versus Ku. Kiran Shrivastava & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
09-01-2020 Rajesh Kumar Mishra & Others Versus General Manager, Central Electrical & Mechanical Workshop, SECL, Korba (CG) & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
07-01-2020 Union of India & Others Versus Ex. No. 3192684 W. Sep. Virendra Kumar Supreme Court of India
07-01-2020 For the Petitioners: Anjani Kumar, Sr. Advocate, Sanjay Prasad, Advocate. For the Respondents: ----------- High Court of Judicature at Patna
07-01-2020 Alok Kumar & Others Versus State of U.P. Thru Special Secy. Basic Education Lko. & Others High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
07-01-2020 Dinesh Kumar Soni Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh High Court of Madhya Pradesh
07-01-2020 Rakeh Kumar Das Versus State of West Bengal & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
07-01-2020 P. Jayachandran Versus S. Kumar (Died) & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
07-01-2020 Union of India & Another Versus Tapan Kumar Roy High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
06-01-2020 Ashok Kumar Versus The Director, Banarsidas Chandiwala Institute of Professional Studies & Another High Court of Delhi
06-01-2020 Surinder Kumar Versus State of Punjab Supreme Court of India
04-01-2020 B.K. Uday Kumar Versus The State of Karnataka, by its Principal Secretary to Government, Department of Energy, Bengaluru & Others High Court of Karnataka
03-01-2020 The General Manager, Aleppy Parcel Service, Alappuzha Versus Anil Kumar V., Managing Partner, Wetex Garments, Poovattuparamba, Kozhikode Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
03-01-2020 Lalit Kumar Sahu Versus State of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh
02-01-2020 Raj Kumar Goyal Versus Jalandhar Improvement Trust & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
30-12-2019 Ashok Kumar Shaw & Others Versus Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
21-12-2019 Mohd. Shoaib Thru Next Friend Gaurav Kumar Kashyap Versus State of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. Home & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
20-12-2019 Dr. Subir Kumar Banerjee & Others Versus Neetu Singh & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
19-12-2019 The State of Maharashtra Versus Vijay Maruti Bombale & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
19-12-2019 J. Vijay Anthony Versus The Director, Directorate of Medical Education, Poonamallee High Road, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-12-2019 Pawan Kumar Gupta Versus State High Court of Delhi
18-12-2019 Shamrao Moreshwar Kulkarni & Others Versus Vijay Jasraj Rahatekar & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
18-12-2019 Akshay Kumar Singh Versus State (NCT of Delhi) Supreme Court of India
17-12-2019 K.M. Kumar Versus The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
17-12-2019 Jatinder Kumar Versus State of Haryana Supreme Court of India
17-12-2019 M/s. Aradhana Distributors Pvt. Ltd., through its Director Sanjay Kumar Patodia Versus M/s. Renault India Pvt. Ltd., T. Nagar High Court of Judicature at Madras
17-12-2019 Rockline Construction Company a Sole Proprietor firm of Saranga Anil Agarwal Versus Doha Bank, QSC & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
16-12-2019 Ashi Kumar Versus Aseem Agarwal Supreme Court of India
16-12-2019 Mukul Kumar Tyagi Versus State of Uttar Pradesh & Others Supreme Court of India
13-12-2019 Sanjai Kumar & Others Versus Dr. Prabhat Kumar Supreme Court of India
13-12-2019 Rajnish Kumar Mishra & Others Versus State of Uttar Pradesh & Others Supreme Court of India
12-12-2019 Deepa Jayakumar Versus A.L. Vijay & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
11-12-2019 Sunil Bharti Mittal & Others Versus N. Naresh Kumar & Another High Court of Karnataka
11-12-2019 Kasireddy Ashok Kumar Reddy Versus State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department & Others High Court of Andhra Pradesh
10-12-2019 Sanjay Kumar Shrivastava Versus Pratibha High Court of Madhya Pradesh
10-12-2019 Timir Kumar De Versus Union Bank of India, Through its Br. Manager West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
10-12-2019 Hemant Kumar Singhal Versus Indian Overseas Bank & Another High Court of Delhi
10-12-2019 Rajendra Diwan Versus Pradeep Kumar Ranibala & Another Supreme Court of India
09-12-2019 Ved Prakash Versus Rajneesh Kumar & Another High Court of Himachal Pradesh
06-12-2019 IBIBO Group Pvt. Ltd. Versus Manish Agarwal & Another West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
06-12-2019 Ashok Kumar Khatri & Another Versus ABS Land Development & Construction Pvt. Ltd. & Others West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
06-12-2019 Priya Prabhakaran & Another Versus D. Santhosh Kumar & Others Supreme Court of India
06-12-2019 Dharmendra Prasad & Others Versus Sunil Kumar & Others Supreme Court of India
06-12-2019 New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Versus Krishna Kumar Pandey Supreme Court of India
05-12-2019 Mahipal Versus Rajesh Kumar @ Polia & Another Supreme Court of India
05-12-2019 Sandeep V. Upadhyay & Another Versus Ajit Kumar Banerjee & Others West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
05-12-2019 S. Vettyvel Kumar & Others Versus The State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by the Secretary, Public Works Department, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-12-2019 Ajay Arun Kumar Chougule Versus The State of Maharashtra High Court of Judicature at Bombay
04-12-2019 Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd., Mahalingapuram, Pollachi Versus Rohit Kumar Chandra & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-12-2019 Brijesh Kumar Patel Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & Others High Court of Madhya Pradesh
03-12-2019 The Chirayinkeezhu Service Co-Operative Bank Limited, Thiruvananthapuram, Represented by Its Secretary A. Anil Kumar & Others Versus Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi, Represented by Its Chairman & Others High Court of Kerala
03-12-2019 Ravi Kumar Baldev Yadav & Another Versus The State of Maharashtra High Court of Judicature at Bombay
03-12-2019 Mahesh Kumar Jha Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwailor
03-12-2019 Hariom Vijay Pande Versus State of Maharashtra, Through Divisional Commissioner & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
03-12-2019 Swapan Kumar Ghosh Versus M/s. New Maatara Construction & Others West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
02-12-2019 Kundan Kumar Sinha Versus State of Jharkhand & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
02-12-2019 Binod Kumar Singh Versus The Union of India through the Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India, North Block Secretariat Building New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Patna
28-11-2019 M. Prabhu Ramakrishn Versus Shyam Kumar Shrivastava & & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
28-11-2019 The Assam Public Service Commission & Others Versus Pranjal Kumar Sarma & Others Supreme Court of India
28-11-2019 Jet Airways (India) Ltd. Versus Vinod Kumar Kantha & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
27-11-2019 M/s. UCO Bank, Asset Recovery Management Branch, Represented by its Assistant General Manager, S. Jagadesh Kumar, Chennai Versus The Recovery Officer, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Regional Office, (Ministry of Labour and Employment Government of India), Puducherry & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-11-2019 Vinod Kumar Garg Versus State (Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi) Supreme Court of India
27-11-2019 Kurukshetra Express Pvt. Ltd.Versus Raj Kumar & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
27-11-2019 C.P. Constable No 1400 Sushil Kumar Versus State Of Uttarakhand & Others High Court of Uttarakhand
27-11-2019 Vikash Kumar Sharma Versus State High Court of Delhi
25-11-2019 Akash Khan Versus Mukesh Kumar Ranka High Court of Judicature at Madras
25-11-2019 P. Senthil Kumar Versus The District Collector Cuddalore District & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
25-11-2019 Kapilaben & Others Versus Ashok Kumar Jayantilal Sheth Through POA Gopalbhai Madhusudan Patel & Others Supreme Court of India
22-11-2019 Union Bank of India, Punjab Versus Surinder Kumar Arora & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
21-11-2019 Manoj Kumar Versus State of Karnataka High Court of Karnataka
20-11-2019 Pappu Ghosh @ Samipon Ghosh Versus Tapas Kumar Sen West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
20-11-2019 Pradeep Kumar Versus Unitech Limited Through Its Managing Director, Gurgaon National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
20-11-2019 Kumar @ Chokkalingam Versus State by Inspector of Police, Rajamangalam Police Station, Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
20-11-2019 Rajni Versus Vijay High Court of Delhi
20-11-2019 M/s. Gangothri Textiles Limited represented by Sri Manoj Kumar Tiberwal, Coimbatore & Others Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Corporate Circle, Income Tax Office 67A, Coimbatore High Court of Judicature at Madras