w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Crompton Greaves Limited, Mumbai, Rep. by Its Managing Director, Mumbai (Renamed) (Name of the 1st Appellant Is Renamed As 'CG Power & Industrial Solutions Limited & Others v/s Icon Integrated Industries And Software Ltd., Athani, Ernakulam & Others


Company & Directors' Information:- U. P. POWER CORPORATION LIMITED [Active] CIN = U32201UP1999SGC024928

Company & Directors' Information:- D B POWER LIMITED [Active] CIN = U40109MP2006PLC019008

Company & Directors' Information:- INDIA POWER CORPORATION LIMITED [Active] CIN = L40105WB1919PLC003263

Company & Directors' Information:- INDIA POWER CORPORATION LIMITED [Amalgamated] CIN = U40101WB2003PLC097340

Company & Directors' Information:- CG POWER AND INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS LIMITED [Active] CIN = L99999MH1937PLC002641

Company & Directors' Information:- B L A POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U40102MH2006PTC165430

Company & Directors' Information:- L V S POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U40100TG1996PTC023552

Company & Directors' Information:- S L S POWER CORPORATION LIMITED [Active] CIN = U40109AP2005PLC047008

Company & Directors' Information:- A. K. POWER INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U40104WB2008PTC130530

Company & Directors' Information:- T T G INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27209TN1987PLC014169

Company & Directors' Information:- V I P INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = L25200MH1968PLC013914

Company & Directors' Information:- A L M INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U14100DL1996PLC129067

Company & Directors' Information:- A L M INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U19111DL1996PLC129067

Company & Directors' Information:- A L M INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74110DL1996PLC129067

Company & Directors' Information:- S L V POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U40102KA2002PTC030448

Company & Directors' Information:- R S SOFTWARE (INDIA) LTD. [Active] CIN = L72200WB1987PLC043375

Company & Directors' Information:- S R K INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = L17121MH1991PLC257750

Company & Directors' Information:- S. E. POWER LIMITED [Active] CIN = L40106GJ2010PLC091880

Company & Directors' Information:- E O S POWER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U32109MH1985PTC037094

Company & Directors' Information:- S R INDUSTRIES LTD [Active] CIN = L29246PB1989PLC009531

Company & Directors' Information:- F E INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U36100PB2003PTC026482

Company & Directors' Information:- N K INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = L91110GJ1987PLC009905

Company & Directors' Information:- K L R INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U28939TG2002PLC038416

Company & Directors' Information:- T S I INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U18101HR1997PTC034478

Company & Directors' Information:- E 2 E SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200DL2000PTC107313

Company & Directors' Information:- B L A INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED. [Active] CIN = U10200MH1964PTC162314

Company & Directors' Information:- D C POWER LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U40109TG1996PLC025996

Company & Directors' Information:- E-SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U30007TN1999PTC043325

Company & Directors' Information:- R B T INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24118UP1990PLC011820

Company & Directors' Information:- H G I INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = L40200WB1944PLC011754

Company & Directors' Information:- C K SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72501DL2000PTC106184

Company & Directors' Information:- R P INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27100GJ2011PTC075812

Company & Directors' Information:- D D INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1974PLC007169

Company & Directors' Information:- A G INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27300HR1991PTC031378

Company & Directors' Information:- POWER SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U15139PN2000PTC015139

Company & Directors' Information:- H. J. INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17120GJ2010PTC060769

Company & Directors' Information:- U F M INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = L15311AS1986PLC002539

Company & Directors' Information:- D S R SOLUTIONS LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200TG1999PLC032008

Company & Directors' Information:- J M D POWER SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U40104DL2010PTC197604

Company & Directors' Information:- G R S INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U00000PB2005PLC029159

Company & Directors' Information:- T S L INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = L65999WB1994PLC065255

Company & Directors' Information:- M F B INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U31401TN1989PLC018274

Company & Directors' Information:- A C M E INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Dormant under section 455] CIN = U19119DL1992PLC048914

Company & Directors' Information:- V S P INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17111TZ2005PTC011820

Company & Directors' Information:- V. K. INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27100MH2004PLC149538

Company & Directors' Information:- M N INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24100TG2012PTC079737

Company & Directors' Information:- I POWER SOLUTIONS INDIA LIMITED [Active] CIN = L72200TN2001PLC047456

Company & Directors' Information:- G I INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15312PB2010PTC033806

Company & Directors' Information:- E T C INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U31200MP1995PLC009281

Company & Directors' Information:- S K INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U74899DL1991PTC045572

Company & Directors' Information:- E A P INDUSTRIES LTD [Active] CIN = U25206WB1956PLC023072

Company & Directors' Information:- S R V E INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U03210TZ2006PLC012577

Company & Directors' Information:- J. K. SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999MH2014PTC257168

Company & Directors' Information:- POWER CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED [Amalgamated] CIN = U50101WB1997PLC084060

Company & Directors' Information:- R K INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29300PB1996PLC017836

Company & Directors' Information:- V T INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74990TN2010PLC078041

Company & Directors' Information:- I POWER SOLUTIONS INDIA LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U99999MH1985PTC035660

Company & Directors' Information:- ICON INTEGRATED INDUSTRIES AND SOFTWARE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200KL2000PLC013635

Company & Directors' Information:- Z H INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45200DL2014PTC265453

Company & Directors' Information:- A. M. SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U70101WB1997PTC084181

Company & Directors' Information:- E-3 SOLUTIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74910DL1998PTC096512

Company & Directors' Information:- P AND P INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U21010MH1992PLC068885

Company & Directors' Information:- N G INDUSTRIES LTD [Active] CIN = L74140WB1994PLC065937

Company & Directors' Information:- S L INDUSTRIES P. LTD. [Active] CIN = U15331WB1989PTC047543

Company & Directors' Information:- AMP INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = L51909AS1985PLC002332

Company & Directors' Information:- T R A T INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U25199KL1996PLC010148

Company & Directors' Information:- B R INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1995PLC067120

Company & Directors' Information:- H. V. R. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27100DL2010PTC200428

Company & Directors' Information:- N M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74120DL2008PTC175664

Company & Directors' Information:- N R C INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909PB1985PLC006558

Company & Directors' Information:- S N L INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U17115RJ1994PTC008053

Company & Directors' Information:- J V INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1994PTC057081

Company & Directors' Information:- K K SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72900DL2009PTC193030

Company & Directors' Information:- A R INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27101HR1995PTC032569

Company & Directors' Information:- D V S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1992PTC049221

Company & Directors' Information:- G V G INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17111TZ1980PTC006887

Company & Directors' Information:- C D INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27100MH1996PLC101277

Company & Directors' Information:- G V INDUSTRIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74900TG2014PTC096387

Company & Directors' Information:- G S M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U02001DL2002PTC117443

Company & Directors' Information:- B G INDUSTRIES LTD [Active] CIN = U26921ML1980PLC001830

Company & Directors' Information:- B V POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U40106DL2011PTC213428

Company & Directors' Information:- P K INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51900DL2012PTC241654

Company & Directors' Information:- M D INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U91110GJ1994PTC022025

Company & Directors' Information:- L C INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15122UP2013PTC055697

Company & Directors' Information:- R M G INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18100TG1993PTC016220

Company & Directors' Information:- R. S. D. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909DL2008PTC177504

Company & Directors' Information:- V A SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200TG2006PTC049266

Company & Directors' Information:- D P SOLUTIONS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U22221DL2000PTC107837

Company & Directors' Information:- G. A. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15435MH2005PTC151817

Company & Directors' Information:- I W D W INDUSTRIES LTD. [Strike Off] CIN = U30099WB1990PLC050177

Company & Directors' Information:- P A S INDUSTRIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active in Progress] CIN = U17121TZ2005PTC012171

Company & Directors' Information:- H N H INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27203CH1995PLC017489

Company & Directors' Information:- V AND S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1990PTC039251

Company & Directors' Information:- N Q SOLUTIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909OR2009PTC011136

Company & Directors' Information:- M K J INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U19111UP1989PTC010468

Company & Directors' Information:- M. J. SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72900DL2016PTC304813

Company & Directors' Information:- S S F INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U25190BR1988PLC003160

Company & Directors' Information:- P 2 POWER SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U31103UP2006PTC032446

Company & Directors' Information:- P B INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29120MP1994PTC008840

Company & Directors' Information:- R & M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24297TN1972PTC006185

Company & Directors' Information:- A M INDUSTRIES LTD [Active] CIN = U21012WB1977PLC030854

Company & Directors' Information:- R AND H POWER COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51109UP1965PTC003067

Company & Directors' Information:- A AND S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17117DL1995PTC064137

Company & Directors' Information:- M C INDUSTRIES LTD [Active] CIN = U27106WB1993PLC058995

Company & Directors' Information:- D R INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24100WB2011PTC160058

Company & Directors' Information:- H S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U23209MH2020PTC348174

Company & Directors' Information:- R. L. F. INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909DL1983PLC015262

Company & Directors' Information:- U K INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24241WB1988PTC044355

Company & Directors' Information:- B P INDUSTRIAL CORPN. PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U15312UP1973PTC087037

Company & Directors' Information:- M G I INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27310GJ2006PTC048707

Company & Directors' Information:- A D INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101WB2008PTC131561

Company & Directors' Information:- V J INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29253KA2009PTC050226

Company & Directors' Information:- B R POWER LTD [Active] CIN = U40106WB1995PLC073567

Company & Directors' Information:- N M S POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51109WB1999PTC089747

Company & Directors' Information:- V T INDUSTRIES PVT LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29150WB1985PLC039217

Company & Directors' Information:- V T INDUSTRIES PVT LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29150WB1985PTC039217

Company & Directors' Information:- G R INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U34300PB1996PTC018671

Company & Directors' Information:- M. K. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15549WB2008PTC130116

Company & Directors' Information:- R S V INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U52399MH2008PTC180489

Company & Directors' Information:- K. A. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U14220JH2008PTC013409

Company & Directors' Information:- D K INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45202CH1994PLC014627

Company & Directors' Information:- R K S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U20211WB1997PTC086009

Company & Directors' Information:- D G INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U36942WB1946PTC013526

Company & Directors' Information:- R I L INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U70101DL1993PTC052678

Company & Directors' Information:- I S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29100GJ2009PTC057308

Company & Directors' Information:- B M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17000MH1997PTC109621

Company & Directors' Information:- R V SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909DL2009PTC186716

Company & Directors' Information:- H M B INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U24297GJ1996PTC070418

Company & Directors' Information:- A G B INDUSTRIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U21012TZ2008PTC014753

Company & Directors' Information:- K B R INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27107DL1996PTC079915

Company & Directors' Information:- R V S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17111TZ1995PTC006398

Company & Directors' Information:- B N INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U67120AS1994PTC004273

Company & Directors' Information:- A J INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17120MH2004PTC145040

Company & Directors' Information:- S N A G INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U00000PB1995PLC016158

Company & Directors' Information:- S. A. A INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U01549TZ1997PTC007927

Company & Directors' Information:- K K S K INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U19201TZ1997PTC007687

Company & Directors' Information:- C R I INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Amalgamated] CIN = U29120TZ2002PTC010129

Company & Directors' Information:- A C T INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1984PTC018724

Company & Directors' Information:- G B INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29220PN2011PTC139883

Company & Directors' Information:- S D B INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27107MP1996PLC010394

Company & Directors' Information:- M M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U31300CT2008PTC020916

Company & Directors' Information:- A C INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U29299WB2006PTC109474

Company & Directors' Information:- K M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Converted to LLP and Dissolved] CIN = U74899DL1991PTC043295

Company & Directors' Information:- C J INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U25209MH1998PTC116707

Company & Directors' Information:- N P INDUSTRIES LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U15549PB1989PLC009426

Company & Directors' Information:- J. L. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29141MP2008PTC020731

Company & Directors' Information:- I K INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24100MH2010PTC199474

Company & Directors' Information:- H. D. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U27310MH2011PTC216080

Company & Directors' Information:- P R B POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U40101TG1995PTC020647

Company & Directors' Information:- R. D. G. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U26960DL2008PTC182480

Company & Directors' Information:- R B INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U28999DL2008PTC177248

Company & Directors' Information:- A K C SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200DL2004PTC128462

Company & Directors' Information:- H & H INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U34100DL2010PTC204604

Company & Directors' Information:- M J INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15203KA2011PTC060675

Company & Directors' Information:- B R V INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U32301UP1995PTC018704

Company & Directors' Information:- I. S. SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U30007TG1997PTC028047

Company & Directors' Information:- A. G. INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U25201UP1994PLC017291

Company & Directors' Information:- B R INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U15204AS1993PLC003930

Company & Directors' Information:- I P M INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U25200DL1995PLC068554

Company & Directors' Information:- M R INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74900UP2008PTC036443

Company & Directors' Information:- R D I INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74900DL1995PTC065508

Company & Directors' Information:- S V G POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U40300AP2012PTC084435

Company & Directors' Information:- J G INDUSTRIES LTD [Active] CIN = L15141WB1983PLC035931

Company & Directors' Information:- L T SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200TG2000PTC033248

Company & Directors' Information:- ICON POWER SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL2001PTC109351

Company & Directors' Information:- V G INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15139JK2015PTC004570

Company & Directors' Information:- L D SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51109DL2015PTC286921

Company & Directors' Information:- S N INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29211UP1951PTC002319

Company & Directors' Information:- A S SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74140DL2010PTC202208

Company & Directors' Information:- K G INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U29130WB1951PTC019868

Company & Directors' Information:- N S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U74120UP2012PTC053986

Company & Directors' Information:- W W I INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29300MH1997PTC112589

Company & Directors' Information:- INDIA POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U31900DL1995PTC070096

Company & Directors' Information:- A V A INDUSTRIAL CORPN PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29191TZ1956PTC000261

Company & Directors' Information:- I S P SOLUTIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200TZ2001PTC009755

Company & Directors' Information:- S P E-SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72300DL2006PTC155569

Company & Directors' Information:- P AND P SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1994PTC057212

Company & Directors' Information:- M POWER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U31908MH2012PTC234343

Company & Directors' Information:- D U INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29230GJ2016PTC091588

Company & Directors' Information:- SOFTWARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200GJ1995PTC025791

Company & Directors' Information:- B V R INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U28999CT2020PTC010570

Company & Directors' Information:- S R P INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Amalgamated] CIN = U00061BR1984PLC002023

Company & Directors' Information:- N. D. SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200TG1998PTC029778

Company & Directors' Information:- T X G SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Converted to LLP and Dissolved] CIN = U72200DL2006PTC150671

Company & Directors' Information:- A N S INDIA POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51101DL2014PTC266873

Company & Directors' Information:- C P INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U29303MP1949PTC000846

Company & Directors' Information:- I S SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72300DL2009PTC190772

Company & Directors' Information:- J B INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74999MH2013PTC245506

Company & Directors' Information:- S J V INDUSTRIES LTD [Amalgamated] CIN = U15421WB1982PLC035521

Company & Directors' Information:- V V INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U99999DL1980PTC010427

Company & Directors' Information:- K K INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U65100DL1982PTC013046

Company & Directors' Information:- A T C INDUSTRIES LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U27109AS1984PLC002201

Company & Directors' Information:- T AND H SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200UP2000PTC025638

Company & Directors' Information:- N V INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U51909WB1953PTC020952

Company & Directors' Information:- H D SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72900DL2009PTC194392

Company & Directors' Information:- H & K SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U63040GJ2009PTC059027

Company & Directors' Information:- F A S T SOLUTIONS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U22100MH1989PTC052935

Company & Directors' Information:- A TO Z INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U31908AS1987PTC002804

Company & Directors' Information:- M M K POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U40106AP1998PTC030796

Company & Directors' Information:- K K SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED. [Active] CIN = U72100DL1999PTC101139

Company & Directors' Information:- M S SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200DL2005PTC133997

Company & Directors' Information:- J & I SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74140DL2012PTC236993

Company & Directors' Information:- N AND S SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74210KA1999PTC025555

Company & Directors' Information:- B R INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29253UP2012PTC053966

Company & Directors' Information:- U-TO SOLUTIONS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72100MH2000PTC130052

Company & Directors' Information:- Z D SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72900TN2007PTC062584

Company & Directors' Information:- THE INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15420MH1921PTC000947

Company & Directors' Information:- L K INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17291MH2012PTC233546

Company & Directors' Information:- P I T SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200KL2000PTC014018

Company & Directors' Information:- O AND M SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74210OR2005PTC008166

Company & Directors' Information:- R P A S SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200TG2008PTC057538

Company & Directors' Information:- N K POWER SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U31900DL2016PTC299067

Company & Directors' Information:- G S C INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LTD [Active] CIN = U92114DL1956PTC002616

Company & Directors' Information:- C R E M POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U40101DL2001PTC111631

Company & Directors' Information:- D T POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U40300AP2015PTC097226

Company & Directors' Information:- G L F SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U67190KL2013PTC035455

Company & Directors' Information:- B & J INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U25199GJ2020PTC114151

Company & Directors' Information:- S P SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Amalgamated] CIN = U72200DL2011PTC213318

Company & Directors' Information:- G G INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27320UP1969PTC003282

Company & Directors' Information:- G A S SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200DL2004PTC127546

Company & Directors' Information:- S. S. G. SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200TG1996PTC023719

Company & Directors' Information:- O L G POWER P LTD [Active] CIN = U30007TN1991PTC020898

Company & Directors' Information:- B B SOFTWARE LTD [Strike Off] CIN = L30009WB1995PLC072361

Company & Directors' Information:- K S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U31909MH1960PTC011707

Company & Directors' Information:- G S POWER LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U40102KA2010PLC054033

Company & Directors' Information:- I T SOLUTIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200DL1996PTC076426

Company & Directors' Information:- N G C M (INDUSTRIES) LTD [Dissolved] CIN = U19209WB1979PLC032019

Company & Directors' Information:- D V SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72900WB2011PTC158651

Company & Directors' Information:- POWER AND POWER PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U31300AS1989PTC003282

Company & Directors' Information:- K B SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74140PB2011PTC035055

Company & Directors' Information:- CG INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74900PN2011PTC140651

Company & Directors' Information:- A K SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72900TN2006PTC058887

Company & Directors' Information:- H K SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200WB2001PTC093967

Company & Directors' Information:- P D M POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U40104AS2014PTC011780

Company & Directors' Information:- P R INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U21014DL1971PTC005738

Company & Directors' Information:- R K I INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29190DL2012PTC233413

Company & Directors' Information:- H A SOLUTIONS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72900DL2000PTC104116

Company & Directors' Information:- R K P POWER SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999DL2012PTC230613

Company & Directors' Information:- S B S POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U40100AP2012PTC083965

Company & Directors' Information:- V. J. L. SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999UP2018PTC109127

Company & Directors' Information:- 1 TO 5 SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Not available for efiling] CIN = U74999AS2020PTC020427

Company & Directors' Information:- M S V INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29309TN2020PTC138957

Company & Directors' Information:- J SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200TZ2000PTC009229

Company & Directors' Information:- R K INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U25202AS1988PTC003132

Company & Directors' Information:- C AND C SOLUTIONS (INDIA) LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U93000PY1995PLC001144

Company & Directors' Information:- G V SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200TG2007PTC053991

Company & Directors' Information:- M H T SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72900WB2008PTC127759

Company & Directors' Information:- S G R INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U25199WB1948PTC016397

Company & Directors' Information:- AMP SOLUTIONS LIMITED [Active] CIN = U80302CH2001PLC024420

Company & Directors' Information:- D V M SOLUTIONS LIMITED [Converted to LLP] CIN = U74140DL1999PLC102362

Company & Directors' Information:- G K S INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U24119OR1982PTC001128

Company & Directors' Information:- B & G POWER LIMITED [Active] CIN = U40105PB2010PLC033765

Company & Directors' Information:- B M K INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17100MH1948PTC006398

Company & Directors' Information:- CG POWER SOLUTIONS LIMITED [Active] CIN = U40300MH2012PLC228170

Company & Directors' Information:- T X S SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200TG2007PTC055470

Company & Directors' Information:- T S SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200UP2000PTC025406

Company & Directors' Information:- U & F SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999TN2013PTC089891

Company & Directors' Information:- K S M SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200DL2004PTC128463

Company & Directors' Information:- R B SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200DL2005PTC140322

Company & Directors' Information:- D D INDUSTRIAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U34102DL2006PTC156978

Company & Directors' Information:- K R INDUSTRIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U25190KA2012PTC062367

Company & Directors' Information:- R R SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45309BR2008PTC013387

Company & Directors' Information:- S POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U19202DL1986PTC026505

Company & Directors' Information:- SOFTWARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200RJ1995PTC010577

Company & Directors' Information:- G M POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U40105PN2003PTC017857

Company & Directors' Information:- D R K POWER SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U40106PN2014PTC151330

Company & Directors' Information:- B A SOLUTIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999DL2006PTC155492

Company & Directors' Information:- T C G INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Converted to LLP] CIN = U13200MH1958PTC011079

Company & Directors' Information:- Y K INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U19115UP2012PTC051151

Company & Directors' Information:- E S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74999TN2012PTC086119

Company & Directors' Information:- I B INDUSTRIES LTD. [Strike Off] CIN = U28992WB1990PLC050469

Company & Directors' Information:- POWER INDIA PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U31102WB1983PTC036315

Company & Directors' Information:- V I INDUSTRIES LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U36934WB1951PLC019890

Company & Directors' Information:- R J SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200DL2005PTC133815

Company & Directors' Information:- R M G SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200TN2006PTC058855

Company & Directors' Information:- J M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U05002UP1952PTC002456

Company & Directors' Information:- C A AND S SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200AP2000PTC034546

Company & Directors' Information:- H J SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200TG2007PTC056351

Company & Directors' Information:- U AND U SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U67200OR2004PTC007651

Company & Directors' Information:- S AND S POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U40109PY2004PTC001824

Company & Directors' Information:- R A SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51101MH2013PTC249132

Company & Directors' Information:- R T W SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200MH2004PTC145773

Company & Directors' Information:- U S POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U40103MH2009PTC189364

Company & Directors' Information:- I & I SOFTWARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200TN2005PTC056262

Company & Directors' Information:- D F SOFTWARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200TZ2003PTC010629

Company & Directors' Information:- A E T SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200TG2004PTC036640

Company & Directors' Information:- K N P SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72300TG2011PTC076036

Company & Directors' Information:- L F INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17291UP2015PTC068602

Company & Directors' Information:- I SOLUTIONS(INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72900TN2004PTC052692

Company & Directors' Information:- E. C. SOFTWARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72900TN2007PTC063486

Company & Directors' Information:- Q 3 INDIA SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72900TN2007PTC065786

Company & Directors' Information:- A K S INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U27201WB1946PTC013433

Company & Directors' Information:- K Y SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200DL2005PTC136072

Company & Directors' Information:- R V I T SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200DL2005PTC137434

Company & Directors' Information:- T M I SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200KA2005PTC036299

Company & Directors' Information:- K P M POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U40102KA2008PTC046804

Company & Directors' Information:- R M T SOLUTIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74210KA2011PTC056861

Company & Directors' Information:- V M V INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U26990GJ2013PTC076945

Company & Directors' Information:- S K INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U29248PN1948PLC001948

Company & Directors' Information:- B C L SOFTWARE (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U30007MH1999PTC117922

Company & Directors' Information:- C C M SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200TG2000PTC034002

Company & Directors' Information:- S P INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U20232AS1980PTC001853

Company & Directors' Information:- SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200MH1988PTC047924

Company & Directors' Information:- S S R SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200TG1999PTC033031

Company & Directors' Information:- POWER-X PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U99999DL1970PTC005331

Company & Directors' Information:- INTEGRATED SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Not available for efiling] CIN = U99999DL1998PTC091739

Company & Directors' Information:- S S ICON (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45200AP2007PTC054885

Company & Directors' Information:- S K POWER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U31101KA2006PTC039172

Company & Directors' Information:- V N R INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U21090AP2012PTC081525

Company & Directors' Information:- E M C SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200KA1996PTC020112

Company & Directors' Information:- M I S SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200TN2008PTC068694

Company & Directors' Information:- R I SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U52392WB1999PTC088640

Company & Directors' Information:- A K INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U51109WB1944PTC011764

Company & Directors' Information:- N G L SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200KL2001PTC014656

Company & Directors' Information:- L S SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U67190DL2020PTC371664

Company & Directors' Information:- S P K SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200TZ2003PTC010438

Company & Directors' Information:- R G D POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U41000TG1996PTC023809

Company & Directors' Information:- A. T. SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200TG1996PTC023841

Company & Directors' Information:- 9 I SOLUTIONS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U72200TG2005PTC048565

Company & Directors' Information:- J A K SOFTWARE PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U72200DL2001PTC111929

Company & Directors' Information:- S G SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999BR2008PTC013392

Company & Directors' Information:- K P N SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74900KA2011PTC057705

Company & Directors' Information:- R R SOFTWARE PVT LTD [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U72200KL1991PTC006051

Company & Directors' Information:- A M H SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200DL2005PTC132410

Company & Directors' Information:- K SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200PN2001PTC016012

Company & Directors' Information:- V N SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74900DL2009PTC195421

Company & Directors' Information:- P C S SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200TN2001PTC046709

Company & Directors' Information:- M M R POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U31104DL2008PTC174079

Company & Directors' Information:- P D A SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72900DL2003PTC123465

Company & Directors' Information:- K C SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1989PTC036923

Company & Directors' Information:- R. K. SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74140DL2007PTC161367

Company & Directors' Information:- J K B SOLUTIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74900DL2015PTC284162

Company & Directors' Information:- S R SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200HR2000PTC055629

Company & Directors' Information:- S J POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45207HR2012PTC045937

Company & Directors' Information:- B E SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200KA2005PTC037127

Company & Directors' Information:- G R K SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72900TG2002PTC039029

Company & Directors' Information:- K INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U99999KA1946PTC000938

Company & Directors' Information:- G I P INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U52605MH2015PTC263962

Company & Directors' Information:- P 9 INTEGRATED PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U55101MH2003PTC142002

Company & Directors' Information:- J P SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200PY2003PTC001720

Company & Directors' Information:- T C POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U40101PB2009PTC033405

Company & Directors' Information:- A K INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29130PN2014PTC151053

Company & Directors' Information:- G N SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65993PN2008PTC132031

Company & Directors' Information:- C. L. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27109RJ2014PTC045306

Company & Directors' Information:- S G POWER SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U93000PB2013PTC037834

Company & Directors' Information:- J .S .SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72900PB2007PTC030855

Company & Directors' Information:- S & P SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72100TN2008PTC068960

Company & Directors' Information:- INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LTD [Active] CIN = U74140TN1992PTC021946

Company & Directors' Information:- S L POWER SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74900TN2013PTC091510

Company & Directors' Information:- I SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72300MH2012PTC225903

Company & Directors' Information:- R. A. M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17120MH2014PTC254820

Company & Directors' Information:- D. J. POWER SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U40104PN2009PTC133617

Company & Directors' Information:- H. & T. POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U40106MH2016PTC287646

Company & Directors' Information:- S & O POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U40107MH2010PTC206447

Company & Directors' Information:- SOLUTIONS @ PANORAMA TRAVEL PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U63040MH2010PTC199347

Company & Directors' Information:- S. B. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74900PN2012PTC144181

Company & Directors' Information:- A.N.D SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999MH2013PTC244625

Company & Directors' Information:- S AND D INTEGRATED PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999MH2013PTC249551

Company & Directors' Information:- V D M-POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999MH2015PTC262999

Company & Directors' Information:- V & M SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999PN2014PTC150848

Company & Directors' Information:- G K SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72900MH2004PTC149891

Company & Directors' Information:- G K A SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72900MH2004PTC150210

Company & Directors' Information:- V M SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72900PN2010PTC136847

Company & Directors' Information:- M K R SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U01122TG2004PTC044148

Company & Directors' Information:- H. R. SOLUTIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74120TG2012PTC081581

Company & Directors' Information:- V R M SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200TG2015PTC100001

Company & Directors' Information:- A & P INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U36935TG2014PTC095781

Company & Directors' Information:- C & N INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U40200TG2014PTC095187

Company & Directors' Information:- B S B INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45200TG2013PTC088059

Company & Directors' Information:- T - SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72900TN2011PTC079830

Company & Directors' Information:- R A R INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74900TG2016PTC103684

Company & Directors' Information:- T K SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72900TN2015PTC100464

Company & Directors' Information:- S H SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72900TG2009PTC065812

Company & Directors' Information:- E SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72300UP2016PTC076258

Company & Directors' Information:- A C R POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74900UP2010PTC040987

Company & Directors' Information:- S A E-SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200WB2012PTC181964

Company & Directors' Information:- K S A B INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909WB2012PTC181903

Company & Directors' Information:- K. S. E-SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74999WB2012PTC185025

Company & Directors' Information:- S V S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U36100JK2013PTC003808

Company & Directors' Information:- W N POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U40101JK2013PTC004009

Company & Directors' Information:- Q I SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200JK2011PTC003421

Company & Directors' Information:- O S SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U93000JK2012PTC003733

Company & Directors' Information:- H M SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200HP2011PTC031756

Company & Directors' Information:- B AND P SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24100CH2015PTC035482

Company & Directors' Information:- A T SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72900CH2009PTC031621

Company & Directors' Information:- I-3 INTEGRATED CO. PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72900CH2010PTC032345

Company & Directors' Information:- R AND D SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U52392CH2010PTC032232

Company & Directors' Information:- R D M INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U31100DL2013PTC252294

Company & Directors' Information:- G S L SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72300DL2007PTC164747

Company & Directors' Information:- F K SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72900DL2008PTC186101

Company & Directors' Information:- S N R SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72900DL2012PTC243073

Company & Directors' Information:- B. R. SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74140DL2002PTC116699

Company & Directors' Information:- G. M. S E-SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74140DL2012PTC235662

Company & Directors' Information:- A N S SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74140DL2012PTC245060

Company & Directors' Information:- S & T SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74140DL2013PTC247089

Company & Directors' Information:- M A SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74140DL2014PTC265618

Company & Directors' Information:- S A N SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999DL2002PTC117534

Company & Directors' Information:- O J S G SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74999DL2014PTC267923

Company & Directors' Information:- ICON E-SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999DL2016PTC299350

Company & Directors' Information:- I G SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U70109DL2012PTC244223

Company & Directors' Information:- S N R SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72100DL2011PTC216142

Company & Directors' Information:- R K R SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200DL2004PTC130818

Company & Directors' Information:- P G I T SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200DL2005PTC139469

Company & Directors' Information:- K A V SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72200DL2005PTC144121

Company & Directors' Information:- H R SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74899DL1995PTC073143

Company & Directors' Information:- A 2 Z SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74899DL2001PTC109658

Company & Directors' Information:- C M S SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL2005PTC142352

Company & Directors' Information:- S M I T SOFTWARE COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74899DL2006PTC144816

Company & Directors' Information:- A P D SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74900DL2013PTC249969

Company & Directors' Information:- V R A A P SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74950DL2014PTC271337

Company & Directors' Information:- R & T POWER SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U40108AP2009PTC066234

Company & Directors' Information:- INDUSTRIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U00349KA1947PTC000501

Company & Directors' Information:- R - N - A E - SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74900KA2008PTC045680

Company & Directors' Information:- V S T SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74900KA2010PTC053117

Company & Directors' Information:- J N POWER SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U93000HR2013PTC050369

Company & Directors' Information:- A D SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200KA2002PTC030722

Company & Directors' Information:- V SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200KA2010PTC052832

Company & Directors' Information:- N R L SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72900KA2013PTC069148

Company & Directors' Information:- C K S POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U40101KA2010PTC052199

Company & Directors' Information:- G C I POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U40107KA2010PTC053656

Company & Directors' Information:- A V K INDUSTRIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U52100KA2012PTC066761

Company & Directors' Information:- S V SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74140GJ2007PTC051390

Company & Directors' Information:- R. C. POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U40100GJ2009PTC058005

Company & Directors' Information:- J R J POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U40300GJ2015PTC082396

Company & Directors' Information:- K G M POWER SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U29299KL1999PTC013268

Company & Directors' Information:- V. A. R. INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18209DL2020PTC369202

Company & Directors' Information:- U K J INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U21094DL2020PTC370720

Company & Directors' Information:- I N C INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999MH2020PTC350470

Company & Directors' Information:- O S INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U40109PN2021PTC197839

Company & Directors' Information:- H M I SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45203HR2021PTC094104

Company & Directors' Information:- 9 INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U26999GJ2021PTC122053

Company & Directors' Information:- S V INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U27104WB1960PTC024715

Company & Directors' Information:- J INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U18101OR1960PTC000388

Company & Directors' Information:- B P K INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U99999MH1960PTC011841

Company & Directors' Information:- T & M INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Liquidated] CIN = U99999TN1956PLC002904

Company & Directors' Information:- A & A SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200PN2008PTC131887

Company & Directors' Information:- T N B SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72900MH2007GAT171606

Company & Directors' Information:- H. A. N. R. E. J SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200TG2008PTC062044

Company & Directors' Information:- U K SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72400TN2008PTC069019

Company & Directors' Information:- D V N POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U40101TG2007PTC053069

Company & Directors' Information:- H F SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72300DL2007PTC168577

Company & Directors' Information:- K V M SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72900DL2008PTC180136

Company & Directors' Information:- A. R. POWER PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74999DL2007PTC161616

Company & Directors' Information:- T F M SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74140KL2007PTC021232

Company & Directors' Information:- A R C O N SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72200KL2007PTC020421

Company & Directors' Information:- T & T SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U72900GJ2007PTC051103

Company & Directors' Information:- INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U51109BR1946PTC000228

Company & Directors' Information:- M A INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U15412WB1950PTC019030

Company & Directors' Information:- INDUSTRIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U60200BR1946PTC000035

Company & Directors' Information:- THE INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U00804KA1948PLC000529

Company & Directors' Information:- K INDUSTRIES LIMITED [Not available for efiling] CIN = U99999MH1946PTC005438

Company & Directors' Information:- B M K INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U99999MH1948PTC006393

Company & Directors' Information:- S K INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U99999MH1948PTC006932

Company & Directors' Information:- S K INDUSTRIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U15142PN1948PTC006932

Company & Directors' Information:- V B C INDUSTRIES LTD. [Not available for efiling] CIN = U99999AP2000PTC910431

    RFA. No. 203 of 2008 & CO. No. 71 of 2009

    Decided On, 09 April 2021

    At, High Court of Kerala

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH

    For the Appearing Parties: K. Ramakumar, S. Sreekumar, Sr. Advocates, Smitha George, T. Ramprasad Unni, A.S.P. Kurup, S.V.B. Iyer, P. Martin Jose, P. Prijith, Thomas P. Kuruvilla, Advocates.



Judgment Text

Dr. Kauser Edappagath, J.1. This appeal and cross objection arise from the judgment and decree in OS No.137/2002 dated 30th October, 2007 on the file of the Principal Sub Judge, North Paravur.2. The suit was one for return of the amount paid as advance pursuant to Exts. A1 to A6 and A9 sale agreements. The defendants before the Court below are the appellants. The plaintiff is the respondent. The parties are referred to as shown in the Original Suit unless otherwise stated.3. The plaintiff, Icon Integrated Industries and Software Limited, is a public limited company registered under the Indian Companies Act having its registered office originally at Athani, Aluva, which is within the jurisdiction of the Court below. Originally, Icon Industries was a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act. The partnership was converted into a public limited company in the name and style ‘Icon Integrated Industries and Software Limited’ later on. The first defendant is a public limited company having its Head Office at Mumbai. It owns its division at Athani, Aluva known as ‘Kerala Electric Lamp Works Division’ (KELW Division), which is arrayed as the second defendant.4. Icon Industries, the erstwhile partnership firm, and the first defendant entered into a sale agreement dated 17/07/1999 (Ext. A1) by which the first defendant agreed to sell its KELW Division (second defendant) situated at Athani including land, buildings and structure erected on the said land along with all the movable assets belonging to KELW Division more particularly described in the schedule of the plaint for a total consideration of Rs. 4 crores. As per Ext. A1 sale agreement, a sum of Rs. 10 lakhs was paid by way of advance. When the partnership firm was converted into limited company, the assets and liabilities of the firm were transferred to the plaintiff company and accepting the original sale agreement (Ext. A1), a supplemental agreement was entered into between the plaintiff and the first defendant on 14/04/2000 (Ext. A9). As per Ext. A9, the total consideration of Rs. 4 crores was fixed as the sale consideration and it was agreed to complete the sale within 120 days of Ext. A9. As per the supplemental agreement, a sum of Rs. 125 lakhs was given to the first defendant as advance amount. It was stipulated in Ext. A9 that if the transaction of sale was completed on or before 30/04/2000, the sale consideration would be revised to Rs. 500 lakhs and if the transaction of sale was completed between 01/5/2000 to 31/05/2000, the sale consideration would be Rs. 515 lakhs and the advance amount shall be increased by another Rs. 75 lakhs. The advance amount was stipulated to be paid by the plaintiff to the first defendant on or before 02/05/2000. Pursuant to that, an amount of Rs. 75 lakhs was paid by the plaintiff to the first defendant on 02/05/2000. Thus, total consideration of Rs. 522.50 lakhs was fixed as sale consideration on the terms and conditions mentioned in Exts. A1 and A9. Again, as per mutual consent, five more supplemental agreements were entered into between the parties which were marked as Exts. A2 to A6 and the date for performance was extended till 31/07/2001 retaining all other terms and conditions of the original agreement. Another sum of Rs. 55 lakhs was paid by the plaintiff to the first defendant on 07/11/2000 towards further advance sale consideration. Thus, a total sum of Rs. 255.25 lakhs was paid by the plaintiff to the first defendant towards part payment of sale consideration out of the total sale consideration of Rs. 522.50 lakhs.5. According to the plaintiff, it was ready and willing to perform its part of the contract within the extended period of performance, but, the defendants were not ready and willing to perform their part of the contract. It is alleged that before the stipulated period mentioned in the last supplemental agreement, the first defendant did not perform various obligations cast on it. The plaintiff asserted that the first defendant committed breach of contract. It was in these circumstances the plaintiff instituted the suit for realisation of the advance amount paid to the first defendant pursuant to the sale agreements with interest. The total amount claimed including interest till the date of institution of the suit was Rs. 2,86,84,505/-.6. The defendants in the written statement admitted the execution of Ext. A1 sale agreement and Exts. A2 to A6 and A9 supplemental agreements. They have also admitted that the total sale consideration agreed for the sale of the plaint-schedule property was Rs. 522.50 lakhs and the first defendant has received Rs. 255.25 lakhs towards part sale consideration. It is contended that even though the first defendant was always ready and willing to perform its obligations under Ext. A1 original agreement, the plaintiff could not obtain necessary Government approval connected with the transaction and also failed to mobilize necessary funds for discharge of the purchase consideration and consequently, the plaintiff failed to complete the sale within the stipulated time. It is further contended that supplemental agreements were entered into extending the time for performance at the request of the plaintiff. It is also contended that on account of the breach committed by the plaintiff, the defendants have incurred heavy financial expenditure in terms of payment of labour and standing charges to keep the undertaking operation and to facilitate the sale as a going concern and the plaintiff agreed to bear those charges from October, 2000. According to the defendants, they have incurred loss to the tune of Rs. 2,94,19,258/- due to the breach committed by the plaintiff and hence they are entitled to appropriate the said sum from the advance lying with them.7. The defendants challenged the jurisdiction of the Court below to entertain and try the suit. It is contended that the Court below has no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the suit as there is a specific clause in the agreement that any dispute shall be settled only in the courts at Cochin. It is also contended that no cause of action ever accrued within the jurisdiction of the Court below. According to the defendants, Ext. A1 agreement was entered into at a hotel at Palarivattom, Ernakulam. Therefore, in view of the agreement between the parties, there is exclusion of jurisdiction of the courts at North Paravur. The defendants sought for the dismissal of the suit.8. The Court below framed issues based on the contentions of the parties. PW1 was examined and Exts. A1 to A12 were marked on the side of the plaintiff. DW1s to 4 were examined and Exts. B1 to B21 were marked on the side of the defendants. After trial, Court below answered the issue regarding territorial jurisdiction in favour of the plaintiff. On merits, the court below entered into the conclusion that the plaintiff is entitled to get back the advance amount paid after deducting Rs. 72 lakhs, the loss and expenditure sustained by the defendants by the breach committed by the plaintiff. Accordingly, a decree for Rs. 1,83,25,000/- with interest @9% per annum from the date of the suit till realisation was granted to the plaintiff. Aggrieved by the said judgment and decree, the defendants preferred the appeal.9. The plaintiff preferred the cross objection to the extent the judgment and decree went against them. The finding of the Court below that the defendants sustained loss to the tune of Rs. 72 lakhs by the breach committed by the plaintiff and the deduction of the same from the plaint claim has been challenged in the cross objection. Similarly, the finding of the Court below that the plaintiff committed breach of contract has also been challenged. The plaintiff is also aggrieved by the non awarding of interest prior to the institution of the suit and not allowing cost by the Court below.10. We have heard Sri.K. Ramakumar, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants and Sri.S. Sreekumar, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent.11. We have considered the pleadings, oral evidence on record and exhibits marked in trial quite in extenso. Two crucial points arise for consideration in this appeal and cross objection:1) Whether court below lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain and try the suit?2) Whether the advance amount paid by the plaintiff towards sale consideration is liable to be forfeited on the mere allegation of breach of contract without proof of sufferance of actual loss or damage and in the absence of determination and quantification of the actual loss/damage alleged to have suffered by the defendants?Point No.1:In the written statement, the defendants have raised a specific plea that the Court below has no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the suit. It is contented that the parties have specifically agreed that any suit or proceedings arising pursuant to the agreement can only be instituted in the Courts of Cochin and as such, the Court below has no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the suit. It is further contended that the suit is one for realisation of money and no question of adjudicating any rights of the plaint-schedule property arises and as such, merely for the reason that the plaint-schedule property which is the subject matter of agreement is situated within the territorial limits of the jurisdiction of the Court below, it will not get jurisdiction. It is also contended that no cause of action has accrued within the jurisdiction of the Court below and since the agreement under which the money is claimed to be recovered from the defendants has been signed, executed and entered into within the municipal limits of Cochin which is outside the territorial jurisdiction of the Court below, the suit is not maintainable before the said court.12. The Court below found the issue of jurisdiction in favour of the plaintiff holding that in terms of Section 16 (c) of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short 'the C.P.C') and Section 55 (6) (b) of the Transfer of Property Act (for short 'the T.P Act'), the suit is maintainable before the Court below as the charge is claimed. The Court below also observed that the stamp paper was purchased from Angamaly, the part payment was made at Athani and Ext. A1 was typed at Athani, all within the jurisdiction of the Court below and as such, part of the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of the Court below. The said findings have been seriously assailed by the learned Senior Counsel for the appellants/defendants.13. The plea of jurisdiction of courts is considered in accordance with Sections 15 to 20 of the C.P.C. Sections 15 to 20 of the C.P.C contain detailed provisions relating to jurisdiction of courts. They regulate forum for institution of suits. They deal with the matters of domestic concern and provide for the multitude of suits which can be brought in different courts. Section 15 requires the suitor to institute a suit in the court of the lowest grade competent to try it. Section 16 enacts that the suits for recovery of immovable property, or for partition of immovable property, or for foreclosure, sale of redemption of mortgage property, or for determination of any other right or interest in immovable property, or for compensation for wrong to immovable property shall be instituted in the court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the property is situate. The proviso to Section 16 declares that where the relief sought can be obtained through the personal obedience of the defendant, the suit can be instituted either in the court within whose jurisdiction the property is situate or in the court where the defendant actually or voluntarily resides, or carries on business, or personally works for gain. Section 17 supplements Section 16 and is virtually another proviso to that section. It deals with those cases where immovable property is situate within the jurisdiction of different courts. Section 18 applies where local limits of jurisdiction of different courts are uncertain. Section 19 is a special provision and applies to suits for compensation for wrongs to a person or to movable property. Section 20 is a residuary section and covers all those cases not dealt with or covered by Sections 15 to 19.14. Assailing the finding of the Court below that the suit would fall within S.16(c) of C.P.C. as charge was claimed, the learned Senior Counsel for the appellants/defendants submitted that the suit is one for simple recovery of the advance amount and not for specific performance and as such, the jurisdiction of such a suit cannot be decided on the basis of location of immovable property which is the subject matter of Ext. A1 agreement. Per contra, the learned Senior Counsel for the respondent/plaintiff submitted that since the suit is one for recovery of advance amount charged on the plaint-schedule property and the recovery of money is not severable from the charge created, the suit is covered by S.16(c) of C.P.C. Although relief prayed for by the plaintiff is for money decree, the essential, integral and germane facts without which the money decree cannot be passed by the Court is the determination of right to or interest of the defendants in the immovable property and hence, the suit would fall within S.16(d) of C.P.C. as well, submitted the counsel. The counsel also argued that where a case is governed by S.16(c) or (d) of C.P.C., S.20 cannot be called in aid and it is not permissible for the plaintiff to institute the suit in any other Court other than within which the property is situated.15. S.16 of C.P.C recognizes a well established principle that action against the res or property should be brought in the forum where such res is situated. S.16(c) puts emphasise on the institution of the suit for foreclosure, sale or redemption of an immovable property mortgaged of or charged to be instituted in the Court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the property is situate. Under S.55(6)(b) of the T.P Act, the buyer has a charge for price pre-paid, ie., for price that has been paid in anticipation of completion. It is a statutory charge. S.100 of T.P Act which deals with the charges says that where immovable property of one person is by the act of parties or by operation of law made security for the payment of money to another, and the transaction does not amount to a mortgage, the latter person is said to have a charge on the property and all the provisions apply to simple mortgage shall, so far as may be, apply to such charge. Thus, in order to attract S.16(c) of C.P.C., the suit should be one for foreclosure, sale or redemption of an immovable property mortgaged of or charged. Such a suit falls within Order XXXVI of C.P.C. The Court fee to be paid for such suits is u/s 33 of Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1959 (for short 'Court Fees Act'). The prayer in the present suit is not one falling under Order XXXVI of C.P.C. No Court fee is paid u/s 33 of the Court Fees Act. The suit is not one for enforcement of charge. The suit is also not one for sale of charged property. The prayer in the suit is for realisation of advance amount paid by granting a charge on the plaint-schedule property and enabling the plaintiff to sell the same. The court fee is paid u/s 22 of the Court Fees Act which deals with simple suit for money. Hence, the prayer in the suit would not fall within the ambit of S.16(c) of C.P.C.16. S.16(d) provides that suit for determination of any right or interest in immovable property must be instituted in the Court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the property is situate. This clause refers to other suits of a like nature where the title to or some other interest in the property is in dispute and the Court has to determine the matter. In other words, clause (d) relates to such suits in which the determination of any right to or interest in, immovable property not covered by the clauses (a), (b) and (c) is involved. As already stated, the suit is not one for specific performance of contract. It is a simple suit for recovery of advance amount. For the simple reason that a statutory charge is created on the property u/s 55 (6) (d) of the T.P Act, it cannot be said that the suit is one for determination of 'any right or interest' in the immovable property. The determination of any right or interest in the immovable property does not arise at all in the case. Hence, the prayer in the suit will not fall within the ambit of S. 16(d) of C.P.C either. To sum up, we hold that a suit for recovery of unpaid purchase money under a contract of sale of land is not a suit for determination of right or interest in the immovable property falling under S.16(d) of C.P.C even though a charge is created over the property which is the subject matter for the contract of sale u/s 55(6)(d) of the TP Act. Nor is such suit one for enforcement of charge or for sale of a charged property falling u/s 16(c) of C.P.C.17. Section 20 0f C.P.C is a residuary section and enacts the rule as to the forum in all cases not falling within the limitations of Sections 15 to 19. Since we have found that suit would not fall within the ambit of Section 16(c) or (d), provisions of Section 20 shall govern for determining the jurisdiction. The rules as to forum contemplated by Section 20 are alternative. Each of the clauses (a), (b) and (c) is disjunctive and makes provision for a distinct and different situation. It gives option to the plaintiff to sue the defendant either (a) where the cause of action has accrued; or (b) where the defendant resides, or carries on business, or personally works for gain. This is based on the general principle of law that where a suit can be instituted in more than one court, as arbiter litis, it is the plaintiff who has the right to choose and select his own forum. However, when two or more courts have jurisdiction to entertain a suit, an agreement by the parties to submit to the jurisdiction to one of them to the exclusion of others is legal, valid and enforceable at law.18. The learned Senior Counsel for the appellants/defendants Sri.K.Ramakumar submitted that no cause of action has accrued within the jurisdiction of the court below in as much as Ext. A1 agreement has been signed, executed and entered into at Hotel Renaissance, Palarivattom, Ernakulam which is outside the jurisdiction of the Court below. The plaintiff contended that Ext A1 was executed at their office at Nedumbasserry which is within the jurisdiction of the court below. Ext. A1 is silent as to the place of its execution. Both sides gave oral evidence that it was executed at Nedumbasserry and Ernakulam respectively as per their case. The endorsement in Ext. A1 would show that stamp paper was purchased from Angamaly.19. In a suit for return of advance amount or for damages for breach of contract, the place where the contract was executed is not the sole criterion for determining the territorial jurisdiction. The cause of action in respect of such a suit would accrue at the place where the contract was made, or at the place where it should have been performed or the breach committed or at a place where part of sale consideration was paid. Cause of action means every fact which, if traversed, would be necessary for the plaintiff to prove in order to support the right to judgment in his favour. In other words it is a bundle of facts which taken with law applicable to them gives the plaintiff a right to relief against the defendant. The Apex Court in A.B.C.Laminar Pvt. Ltd. and Another v. A.P. Agencies, Salem (AIR 1989 SC 711) has held that “In the matter of a contract there may arise causes of action of various kinds. In a suit for damages for breach of contract the cause of action consists of the making of the contract, and of its breach, so that the suit may be filed either at the place where the contract was made or at the place where it should have been performed and the breach occurred”. This Court in M/s. Shakti Cement Co (P) Ltd. v. M/s F.A.C.T. (1990 KHC 605) has held that the advance payment made by D.D. payable at a particular place determines the jurisdiction to entertain the suit. In that case, the agreement provided for the payment of the advance by D.D. payable in the bank of Cochin and therefore, on facts it was held that Cochin Court had the jurisdiction to try the suit. Thus, a suit for recovery of advance amount paid by the vendee in pursuance of a sale agreement and for damages for breach of contract can be instituted at the place where contract was made, or at the place where it should have been performed or the breach committed or at the place where part of sale consideration was paid.20. Coming to the facts of the case, DW1 in evidence has admitted that part sale consideration of Rs. 55.25 lakhs was received by him for the first defendant Company at Athani in the month of November, 2000. The contract was for the sale of the second defendant division as a going concern. It is situated at Athani. Thus, the contract was to be performed at Athani. For these reasons, there cannot be any doubt that part of cause of action within the meaning of Section 20 (c) of CPC arose at Athani which is within the jurisdiction of the court below.21. The suit will fall under Clause (a) of Section 20 as well. In so far as Clause (a) is concerned, the requirement is that the defendant or if there are more defendants than one, each of the defendants, at the time of commencement of the suit must be actually and voluntarily residing or carrying on business or personally working for gain within the local limits of the jurisdiction of the court before which the suit is laid. Reading Section 20 (a), in the light of the Explanation it is seen that a Corporation shall be deemed to carry on business at its sole or principal office in India or with reference to a cause of action arising at a place where it has a subordinate office. It shall be deemed to carry on business at such a place. The Explanation consists of two parts. By the first part, a Corporation shall be deemed to carry on business at its sole or principal office. Under the second part it shall be deemed to carry on business, in respect of any cause of action arising at any place, where it has also a subordinate office at such place. The two parts are intended to be disjunctive. Thus, a suit against a Corporation can be instituted where it has its sole or principal office in India or in respect of any cause of action or part of cause of action arising at any place where it has also a subordinate office. The word ‘Corporation’ in the Explanation includes not only statutory corporations but also companies registered under the Indian Companies Act. Order XXIX of C.P.C deals with suits by or against the Corporation and there is nothing in C.P.C that a corporation referred to under S.20 means only a statutory corporation and not a company registered under the Indian Companies Act. The definite case of the plaintiff in the plaint is that the first defendant company has its division office at Athani. It has not been denied in the written statement. Ext A1 agreement itself was to sell the division of the first defendant which has been shown as the second defendant. In Ext. A1 it is clearly recited that the second defendant is the division of the first defendant at Athani. We have already found that part of the cause of action took place at Athani. Thus, the court below shall also have territorial jurisdiction under clause (a) of Section 20 with the aid of Explanation to it.22. Even if the case of the defendants that Ext A1 was signed and executed at Palarivattom, Ernakulam is accepted, the Courts in Ernakulam City as well as Courts at North Paravur will have concurrent jurisdiction to entertain and try the suit. Since the first defendant company has its head office and carries on its business at Mumbai, the competent courts at Mumbai will also have jurisdiction. The case of the defendants is that even if it is a case of accrual of cause of action in more than one courts, as Clause 21 of Ext A1 agreement specifically provided that the transaction would be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Courts at Cochin, the Courts at the municipal limits of Cochin/Ernakulam city where Ext A1 was executed alone shall have jurisdiction.23. The learned Senior Counsel for the appellants submitted that the court below misunderstood and misinterpreted Clause 21 in Ext. A1 as well as various judicial pronouncements. The learned Counsel relied on the following decisions of the Apex Court and this Court to contend that where there are more than one Courts having jurisdiction to entertain the suit, it is open to the parties to provide for and agree which of the two courts have jurisdiction, and when that be so, the Court which has been agreed upon by the parties alone shall have jurisdiction to entertain and try the suit: A.B.C.Laminart Pvt. Ltd and Another v. A.P.Agencies, Salem [(1989) 2 SCC 163]; Vijay Shekhar and Another v. Union of India and Others [(2004) 4 SCC 670]; Hanil Era Textiles Ltd v. Puromatic Filters (P) Ltd. [(2004) 4 SCC 671]; Balaji Coke Industry Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s Maa Bhagawati Coke (Guj) Pvt. Ltd. (2009 KHC 4971); M/s. Angile Insulations v. M/s Davy Ashmore India Ltd., (AIR 1995 SC 1766); Swastik Gases Private Limited v. Indian Oil Corporation Limited [(2013) 9 SCC 32]; Tatanagar Transport Corporation v. Bharat Trading Agency (1974 KLT 105); Jafko Engineers v. Kerala State S.S.I. Corporation (1979 KHC 97); Economic Transport Organisation v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd (1986 KLT 220); Kitex Ltd. v. Surekha (1992 KHC 158); Duroflex (P) Ltd v. Technology Information, Forecasting & Assessment Council (2007 (3) KHC 777); Asianet Satellite Communications Ltd v. D Net Malayalam Digital Pvt. Ltd and Another [2007 (4) KHC 9] and D Net Malayalam Digitals Pvt. Ltd., Kaloor and Another v. Asianet Satellite Communications Ltd., Tvm. [2016 (4) KHC 822 (DB)].24. It is well settled that where the parties to an agreement have chosen to confer exclusive jurisdiction to particular place or Court, among two or more courts having concurrent jurisdiction, in case of dispute, it binds the parties and oust the other Courts having concurrent jurisdiction. Such an agreement is not opposed to public policy. Nor does it contravene Section 28 of the Contract Act. The apex Court in A.B.C. Laminart Pvt. Ltd. (supra) held that when the Court has to decide the question of jurisdiction pursuant to an ouster clause, it is necessary to construe ousting expression or clause properly.25. Clause 21 of Ext A1 reads thus:-“Each of the parties hereto agrees for the benefits of each of the parties to this agreement that the Courts of Cochin shall have the exclusive jurisdiction to hear and determine any suits, actions or proceedings and to settle any disputes which may arise out or in connection with the agreement, and for such purposes submit to the jurisdiction of such Courts”.A close reading of the above clause along with the evidence on record and attended circumstances clearly indicate that parties to Ext. A1 wanted to opt between the Courts at Mumbai and Cochin and not between the Courts inter se at Cochin. Clause 21 gives option to approach any of the competent courts in Cochin. It does not confer jurisdiction to a particular Court in Cochin or Ernakulam. Nor does it confer jurisdiction to the Court in Cochin where Ext. A1 was executed as contended by the defendants. When specific questions were put to PW1 with reference to Clause 21, he answered that at the time of preparing Ext A1. there was discussion about the jurisdiction of the Courts in case dispute arises and it was decided to exclude the jurisdiction of the courts at Mumbai and to have jurisdiction at the Courts at Kerala where the plaint schedule property was situated. DW4 also deposed that there is no special meaning attached to the words ‘Courts in Cochin’ and the intention of both the plaintiff and the defendants was to confer jurisdiction only in Courts in Cochin.26. According to the defendants. Ext. A1 was prepared at their advocate’s office, Menon & Pai, situated in Ernakulam city and it was executed at Hotel Renaissance, Palarivattom which is also situated in Ernakulam City. Strictly speaking, Cochin is a small town/place located within Ernakulam District. This place includes the suburbs of Fort Kochi, Mattancherry, Eda Kochi, Palluruthi and Thoppumpady. The Sub Court within this jurisdiction is situated at Thoppumpady. Ernakulam also is the name of the town – the administrative capital of the Ernakulam District. However, for all practical purposes, Ernakulam and Cochin generally refers to same place, especially by those outside the state. Even the defendants have no case that the parties intended to confer jurisdiction to the court situated in Cochin town, i.e., at Sub Court, Kochi. It is not possible to confer jurisdiction to the said court either, since no part of cause of action admittedly arose within the jurisdiction of the said court. Thus, it is manifest that the intention was to exclude the jurisdiction of the Courts at Mumbai and to confer jurisdiction to any of the competent courts at Cochin/Ernakulam District.27. The expression “Courts of Cochin” used in Clause 21 can never be confined to Courts at municipal limits of Cochin or Ernakulam city/town. If the parties agree to exclude the jurisdiction over the Courts located at different places without referring to Courts, but with reference to the location, suit can be brought before any court having jurisdiction within the location. Thus, even going by the recitals in Ext. A1, the Court below is having jurisdiction to entertain and try the suit.28. Even assuming that Court below had no jurisdiction to try the suit, it is still open under Section 21 of CPC to consider whether the objection as to place of suing has been taken in the trial Court and whether there has been a consequent failure of justice as a whole due to the reason that the said Court had no territorial jurisdiction to try the suit.29. Section 21 forbids appellate or revisional court to allow objection as to the place of suing or pecuniary limits unless it was taken in the original court at the earliest and unless there was a consequent failure of justice. It is a curative provision to ensure that technicalities do not prevail when there is no failure of justice. It is a statutory recognition of the principle that there is difference between inherent lack of jurisdiction which goes to the root of the matter or competence of a court trying a case and a lack of territorial or pecuniary jurisdiction. The policy underlying Section 21 has been succinctly explained by the Apex Court in the leading case Kiran Singh v. Chaman Paswan (AIR 1954 SC 340) thus:“The policy underlying Section 21 and 99 of CPC and Section 11 of the Suits Valuation Act is the same, namely, that when a case had been tried by a court on merits and judgment rendered, it should not be liable to be reversed purely on technical grounds, unless it had resulted in failure of justice, and the policy of the legislature has been to treat objections to jurisdiction both territorial and pecuniary as technical and not open to consideration by an appellate court, unless there has been a prejudice on the merits.”30. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that failure of justice need be shown only in a case where the objection as to territorial jurisdiction was taken for the first time before the appellate or revisional Court. Since the defendants have taken the objection as to territorial jurisdiction before the Court below at the earliest opportunity, Section 21 is not attracted, argued the Counsel. We cannot subscribe to the said argument. A plain reading of Section 21 would show that all the three conditions stated therein must coexist and even if an objection was taken at the very first opportunity and before issues were settled, there has also to be a consequent failure of justice before the plea of jurisdiction can succeed before the appellate court. It is held by the Apex Court in Pathumma v. Kuntalan Kutty (AIR 1981 SC 1683) that even if the objection was taken in the Court of first instance and also such objection was taken at the earlier possible opportunity, yet the other third and important condition as prescribed under S.21 that there has been a consequent failure of justice has to be made out. The Apex Court again in R.S.D.V. Finance Company Pvt. Ltd. v. Shree Vallabha Glass Works Ltd (1993 KHC 891) has reiterated that where the first two conditions in Section 21 are satisfied but the third condition of failure of justice is not fulfilled, there was no justification in allowing objection to jurisdiction at the appellate stage. The decision in Pathumma (supra) was followed in Ranga Rao K.P. v. Venkatesham and Others (2015 KHC 4944) and held that an objection as to place of suing cannot be allowed at the appellate stage unless there has been a failure of justice. Thus, we hold that even though an objection as to the territorial jurisdiction of the court trying the suit has been raised at the earliest opportunity at the trial court and was wrongly disallowed, the challenge in that regard is to be entertained by the appellate court or revisional court, as the case may be, only when it is demonstrated that there has been a consequent failure of justice. The purport of the failure of justice in a given situation depends upon the facts and circumstances of each case31. The burden is on the defendants to show that the court lacked jurisdiction and consequent to exercise of jurisdiction, failure of justice had taken place. The defendants have not shown how failure of justice resulted from the suit being instituted in the Court below. In the grounds of appeal, the appellants/defendants have not even raised a ground that there was a failure of justice consequent upon a wrong Court assuming jurisdiction. No argument was also advanced before us as to the so called failure of justice. Not only was no attention paid to this aspect of the matter but no material exists on the record from which such failure of justice may be inferred. In Kiran Singh (supra), it was held that the prejudice envisaged by Section 21 must be something other than the suit being heard in a different forum. The record would show that the defendants vehemently contested the suit on merits and suffered a decree. Thus, the defendants miserably failed to establish failure of justice.32. For the reasons stated above, the plea of want of jurisdiction for the trial Court to try the suit raised by the defendants, deserves to be rejected.Point No.2: The execution of Ext. A1 sale agreement as well as Exts. A2 to A6 and A9 supplemental agreements and the receipt of part sale consideration of Rs. 255.25 lakhs by the first defendant are not in dispute. The contract could not be performed and it was broken. The 1st defendant repudiated the contract by Ext. A7 notice dated 30/07/2001. Both the plaintiff and the defendants accuse each other for the breach. On an assessment of the evidence on record and the materials available, the court below entered into the finding that ‘the plaintiff could not complete the sale not on the fault of the defendant as contended’. Though not specifically worded, the court below concluded that the breach was committed by the plaintiff. Though the plaintiff challenged the said finding in the cross objection, no serious argument was advanced on it. On re appreciation of evidence, we see no reason to take a different view on the said finding of the court below regarding breach of contract.33. The learned Senior Counsel for the appellants/defendants argued that the amount of Rs. 255.25 lakhs represents the earnest money and the first defendant is entitled to forfeit the same in terms of Ext. A1 agreement. The defendants have suffered loss to the tune of Rs. 2,94,19,258/- due to the breach committed by the plaintiff and, thus, the court below went wrong in granting a decree for return of advance amount, added the Counsel. Per contra, the learned Senior Counsel for the respondent/plaintiff submitted that amount of Rs. 255.25 lakhs was paid as advance for purchase of property, not earnest money and, thus, not liable to be forfeited. The learned Senior Counsel further submitted that there is absolutely no evidence for the alleged loss sustained by the defendants and that in the absence of plea for set off or counter claim by remitting requisite court fee, the said plea could not have been entertained by the court below.34. The consequences of breach of contract are contained in Chapter VI of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 ('the Act' for short). The Chapter begins with Section 73 and ends with Section 75. It deals with every consequence in the case of breach of contract. Section 73 provides that when a contract has been broken, the party who suffers by such breach is entitled to receive from the party, who has broken the contract, compensation for any loss or damage caused to him. This provision makes it clear that such compensation is not to be given for any remote or indirect loss or damage sustained by reason of the breach. The underlying principle enshrined in this section is that whenever there is a breach of contract, the party who suffers by such a breach is entitled to recover the loss or damage caused to him from the other party. However, recovery of any such loss or damage cannot be made unless the party claiming has actually suffered the loss or damage and the same has been quantified. S.74 provides for award of compensation for breach of contract where a penalty is stipulated. It entitles a party to claim reasonable compensation from the party who has broken the contract which compensation can be pre-determined compensation stipulated at the time of entering into the contract itself. Thus, this section provides for pre-estimate of the damage or loss which a party is likely to suffer if the other party breaks the contract entered into between the two of them. S.75 relates to the right of the party to rescind a contract. It says that a person who rightfully rescinds a contract is entitled to compensation for any damage which he has sustained through the non-fulfillment of the contract. In short, whether it be a contract which stipulates a sum of money as being payable on breach of contract or whether it contains any other penal clause, or whether it is a contract which does not contain any such clause, the party complaining of breach of contract cannot successfully claim compensation unless he makes out loss or damages referable to such breach.35. The Constitution Bench of the Apex Court in Fateh Chand v. Balkishan Dass (AIR 1963 SC 1405) had an occasion to consider the impact of S.73 and S.74 of the Indian Contract Act and its effect on the forfeiture clause in an agreement for sale of immovable property. It was held that where a seller pleads that there is a breach of contract by the buyer and the seller seeks to forfeit an amount as paid by the buyer for being appropriated as designated liquidated loss amount of damages as per contractual clause, then the act of forfeiture is one which falls under Section 74 of the Contract Act. i.e before forfeiture can take place, it must be necessary that loss must be caused. It was made clear that a mere breach of contract by a buyer does not entitle the seller to forfeit the amount as received, unless, loss is proved to have been caused to the prospective sellers/defendants/respondents. The Supreme Court in Kailash Nath Associates v. Delhi Development and Another {(2015) 4 SCC 136} following Fateh Chand (supra) reiterated that there cannot be forfeiture of an amount paid under an agreement to sell once no loss is pleaded and proved by a proposed seller under an agreement to sell. Thus, if there is no loss which is suffered by a seller, then there cannot be forfeiture simply because a clause in a contract provides so.36. Coming to the merits of the case, Ext. A1 contains a clause that in the event of the purchaser failing to comply with the terms and conditions of the agreement by making the payment of balance consideration before the stipulated time mentioned in the agreement or any extension thereof, the seller shall have the right to revoke the agreement by 15 days notice and upon such revocation, the amount paid as earnest money deposit shall be forfeited to the benefit of the seller (Clause 17). It is on the basis of this covenant in the agreement that the appellant says that the entire amount ought to have been allowed to be forfeited by him.37. Earnest money is paid or given at the time when the contract is entered into and, as a pledge for its due performance. It is trite that part payment of purchase price cannot be forfeited unless it is a guarantee for the due performance of the contract. In other words, if the payment is made only towards part payment of consideration and not intended as earnest money, then the forfeiture clause will not apply. In Videocon Properties Ltd. v. Bhalchandra Laboratories {(2004) 3 SCC 711}, the Supreme Court examined the nature and character of the earnest money and took a view that the words used in the agreement alone would not be determinative of the character of the “earnest money” but really the intention of the parties and surrounding circumstances. It held that the earnest money serves two purposes of being part – payment of the purchase money and security for the performance of the contract by the party concerned. It is not the description by word used in the agreement only that would be determinative of the character of the sum but really the intention of the party have to be looked into and what may be called as an 'advance money' may really be a deposit or 'earnest money' and what is termed as a deposit or earnest money “may ultimately turn out to be really an advance or part of purchase price”. The Supreme Court in Satish Batra v. Sudhir Rawal {(2013) 1 SCC 345} has held that to justify the forfeiture of advance money being part of “earnest money”, the terms of the contract should be clear and explicit and that in agreement for purchase of immovable property, the forfeiture clause will not apply when the payment is made only towards part payment of consideration and not intended as earnest money. Applying the ratio in the above two decisions to the facts of the case at hand, it can be seen that there is no stipulation in Ext. A1 agreement that the amount is paid as a security for performance of the contract. No other evidence was also let in by the defendants in this regard. When the partnership was converted into a limited company, a supplemental agreement was entered into between the plaintiff and the 1st defendant on 14/04/2000 which has been marked as Ext. A9. Ext A1 agreement was amended, varied and modified by Ext A9. It was stipulated in Ext. A9 that if the transaction of sale was not completed on or before 07/08/2000, the agreement shall automatically lapse and neither party shall have any obligation under the agreement except the refund of the advance amount received by the seller to the purchaser within seven days from the lapse of the agreement. This clause in Ext. A9 supersedes clause 17 regarding forfeiture in Ext. A1. That apart, the total advance amount paid consists of almost half of the total sale consideration. It is trite that if the amount received as advance bear a sizeable proportion to the total sale consideration, it cannot by any stretch of imagination be stated as earnest money. The advance was, therefore, not paid by way of security for performance of contract and the same was made part of the sale consideration to be adjusted at the time of execution of the sale deed. The defendants were, thus, not entitled to forfeit the advance amount. They are entitled to appropriate the amount received as advance only on proof of legal injury, if any, suffered on account of breach.38. As already stated, as against the claim of the plaintiff for return of the entire advance amount of Rs. 255.25 lakhs, the defendants raised a plea that they have sustained loss and damages to the tune of Rs. 2,94,19,258/- on account of the breach of contract committed by the plaintiff. It is contended that the defendants sustained heavy financial expenditure in terms of payment of labour and standing charges, loss of income and other incidental expenses. Relying on Ext. B11 letter issued by the plaintiff, the defendants contended that the plaintiff agreed to bear the labour and standing charges from October, 2000. According to the defendants, the plaintiff is not entitled for refund of the advance amount since they are entitled to adjust and set off the above mentioned loss and damages sustained by them. The Court below on assessment of evidence found that as per Ext. B11 letter, the plaintiff agreed to pay the labour and standing charges every month from October, 2000 onwards and agreed to bear 50% of charges for the month of October, 2000 and the full charges from 31st October, 2000 till the completion of the sale. The Court below observed that in Ext. B11, the plaintiff admitted that the monthly expenditure would come to around Rs. 8 lakhs and as such the defendants are entitled to realise Rs. 8 lakhs per month from 31/10/2000 to 30/7/2001 amounting to Rs. 72 lakhs. The relief for return of advance was granted to the plaintiff after deducting the said Rs. 72 lakhs. The cross objection has been preferred by the plaintiff challenging the impugned judgment/decree to the extent it has confined the decree for an amount of Rs. 1,83,25,000/- as against the amount of Rs. 255.25 lakhs paid by them to the first defendant by way of advance.39. It is pertinent to note that the defendants did not raise any set off or counter claim for their plea that they sustained loss and damages on account of the breach of contract committed by the plaintiff, nor did they pay any Court fee. A vendee through whose default a contract for sale falls, is entitled to recover the amount of purchase money paid by him and the vendor can only resist the claim by seeking to set off against the said sum any damages which he might have incurred by a reason of the vendee's non performance of the contract. The only contention in the written statement is that the defendants have sustained damages due to the wilful breach committed by the plaintiff to the tune of Rs. 2,94,19,258/- and entitled to adjust and set off the same from the advance amount. The court below on evaluation of evidence found that no legal evidence had been adduced by the defendants to establish the loss and damages claimed by them. However, the Court below found that by virtue of Ext. B11 letter, the plaintiff is legally bound to pay an amount of Rs. 72 lakhs as expenditure incurred to the defendants by the act of the plaintiff. In the plaint, in paragraph 10, the plaintiff has adverted to Ext. B11 letter. The averments contained in Ext. B11 have been specifically denied. It is alleged that Ext. B11 letter has been misconstrued and the amount of Rs. 4,24,623/- and Rs. 8,703/- stated in Ext. B11 were paid on the basis of mutual understanding to cover the trial run expenses. It is specifically stated that there was no agreement in Ext. B11 to make payment towards labour and standing charges from October, 2000. According to the plaintiff, Ext. B11 was sent with specific stipulation to complete and conclude the conveyance before 15/11/2000 and it was under that circumstances it undertook to share 50% of the cost of labour, electric charges from 1/10/2000 to 30/10/2000 and from 31/10/2000 to 15/11/2000. The case of the defendants that plaintiff admitted in Ext. B11 that it shall pay labour and standing charges from October, 2000 to July, 2001 has been specifically denied by the plaintiff in the plaint. Thus, adjudication of the said claim is absolutely necessary to find whether the defendants are entitled to adjust the said amount towards the balance consideration. No pecuniary liability arises till the Court determine that the party complaining of the breach is entitled to damages. The Court in the first place must decide that the defendants are liable and then, it should proceed to assess what the liability is. Till that determination, there is no liability at all upon the plaintiff. Still, the defendants have not chosen to set up set off or counter claim in the written statement. Except using the word 'set off' in paragraphs 20 and 21 of the written statement, the defendants have not done anything to lay such a claim of set off or counter claim in accordance with the procedure.40. Order VIII Rule 6, Rules 6A to 6G and 7 of the Code of C.P.C regulate both substantial and procedural rights of a person claiming set off or counter claim in a suit. In the first place, such a claim should be set up with the written statement by giving all the particulars and the cause of action. The Court fee also will have to be paid. A contention has been raised that the plea raised by the defendants is not one falling under set off or counter claim but only an adjustment and as such, the same can be adjudicated without raising set off or counter claim or paying court fee. One of the basic factors which has to be taken into consideration while determining whether a plea raised in a defence is a plea of set off or payment by adjustment, is to find out as to whether a separate action could be maintained by the defendant on the basis of claim made by him. If a separate claim could be maintained by him and put forward in a separate suit, then the plea would be a plea of set off and court fee will have to be made on the claim. On the other hand, if adjustment had been made prior to the filing of the suit, no court fee would be payable on the amount which stood adjusted prior to the institution of the suit, as the plea in that case would be plea of adjustment by payment. Under Schedule 1 Article 1 of the Court Fees Act, ad valorem fee is payable on the set off claimed but no Court fee need be paid on the plea of adjustment for the simple reason that the plea of adjustment is in the nature of informing the Court that prior to the institution of the suit, the amount or a part of it stood adjusted and the plaintiff was not entitled to claim that amount. Applying the above principles to the case on hand, it can be safely seen that all the claims made by the defendants in the written statement are really in the nature of a set off or counter claim and not any payment for adjustment. It is not at all the case of the defendants that they adjusted any amount of the plaintiff lying in their hands towards the amount allegedly due to them under various heads mentioned in the written statement. On the other hand, it is the case of the defendants that the plaintiff has to make such adjustment, but failed to do so and the defendants, therefore, now wants to set off those amounts against the amount claimed by the plaintiff in the suit. The case of the defendants is that on account of the breach committed by the plaintiff, they have suffered loss and damages to the tune of Rs. 2,94,19,255/- and entitled to adjust the same towards the advance amount. This claim for damages could have been filed as a separate suit also. Moreover, the plaintiff has clearly disputed in Ext. B11 in the plaint and contended that there was no agreement to pay the labour and standing charges from October, 2000 to July 2001. Therefore, the said issue requires adjudication. Hence, it can never be an adjustment. It can only be a claim for set off or counter claim. Thus, the Court below could not have entertained the plea of set off by the defendants. Even assuming that it could have been gone into by the Court below, there is no plea in the written statement that the defendants are entitled to the amount as stated in Ext. B11 letter. No issue has been raised as to whether the defendants are entitled to any amount as per Ext. B11 letter. Ext. B11 letter can never be termed as a contract between the parties nor does it spell out a supplemental agreement. After Ext. B11 letter, the parties executed Ext. A5 supplemental agreement dated 17/11/2000. In Ext. A5, there is no stipulation to pay any expenditure as provided in Ext. B11. As per clause 19 of Ext. A1, the agreement shall not be altered, amended or modified except by an instrument in writing. Ext. B11 is not an instrument in writing and not as contemplated under Clause 19 of Ext. A1. Hence, Ext. B1 does not incorporate any terms of conditions in Ext. A1. Ext. B11 letter has no consequence after execution of Ext. A5 supplemental agreement. For all these reasons, we hold that the Court below went wrong in deducting Rs. 72 lakhs, being the loss and expenditure sustained by the defendants on account of the breach committed by the plaintiff, from the advance amount.41. The plaintiff has claimed Rs. 26,80,125/- towards interest prior to the institution of the suit till the date of filing. But the Court below did not award interest. Only interest pendete lite and future interest at the rate

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

of 9% per annum were granted. The plaintiff in the cross objection challenged non awarding of the interest prior to the institution of the suit.42. The law with regard to the claim of interest is well settled. Section 34 of C.P.C applies to the award of interest from the date of suit to the date of decree and also from the date of decree till the date of payment. Section 34 has no application to interest for the period prior to the institution of the suit. The claim of interest prior to the institution of the suit may be sustained only in cases where there is an agreement for the payment of interest at fixed rate, or, if interest is payable by some law or custom or usage having the force of law, or under the provisions of any substantive law entitling the plaintiff to recover the interest. In the absence of any contract, express or implied, or any of the provisions of the law or any custom of usage, the Court cannot award interest by way of damages caused on account of wrongful detention of money. There is no stipulation in Ext. A1 or Exts. A2 to A6 and A9 agreements regarding the interest. Hence, the Court below was justified in not awarding interest till the date of the suit. No interference is called for on the said finding of the Court below.43. The next question relates to grant of costs. The Court below did not allow costs of the proceedings to the plaintiff. The plaintiff challenges the same in the cross objection. Normally, costs should follow the event and the successful party is entitled to costs unless there are good grounds for depriving him of that right. Section 35(1) says that costs to be awarded under the said section shall be in the discretion of the Court. But, like all other discretions, discretion to award costs also should be exercised judicially, properly and on sound legal principles. If the trial Court exercises that discretion correctly, the appellate Court would be loath to interfere with the same. If, however, trial Court did not exercise the discretion at all or exercised discretion on a misrepresentation of fact or law, then, the appellate Court may interfere with the direction of the trial Court with regard to grant of costs.44. Sub-sec.(2) of S.35 of C.P.C. indicates that the costs shall follow the event and where the Court directs that costs shall not follow, then the Court shall state its reasons in writing. The Apex Court in Sanjeev Kumar Jain v. Raghubir Siran Charitable Trust and Others (2011 KHC 4966) deprecated the practice followed in the Courts in the country in not following the mandate of sub-section (2) of S.35 and directed its strict enforcement. It was observed thus:“The mandate of sub-section (2) of S.35 of the Code that 'where the Court directs that any costs shall not follow the event, the Court shall state its reasons in writing' is seldom followed in practice by courts. Many courts either do not make any order as to costs or direct the parties to bear their respective costs without assigning or recording the reasons for giving such exemption from costs. Unless the Courts develop the practice of awarding costs in accordance with S.35 (that is, costs following the event) and also give reasons where costs are not awarded, the object of the provision for costs would be defeated. Prosecution and defence of cases is a time consuming and costly process. A plaintiff / petition / appellant who is driven to the court, by the illegal acts of the defendant / respondent, or denial of a right to which he is entitled, if he succeeds, to be reimbursed of his expenses in accordance with law. Similarly a defendant / respondent who is dragged to court unnecessarily or vexatiously, if he succeeds, should be reimbursed of his expenses in accordance with law. Further, it is also well recognised that levy of costs and compensatory costs is one of the effective ways of curbing false or vexatious litigations”.45. The Court below did not exercise any discretion at all in refusing to award costs in the present case. No reason as contemplated under sub-section (2) of S.35 has been stated. When a plaintiff succeeds in a litigation, for which he was not responsible and he was not guilty of misconduct, he ought not to be deprived of his legitimate costs. The plaintiff made a demand through notice to return the advance amount prior to the institution of the suit, but the amount was not paid. Hence, the plaintiff had no other go but to file the suit. The plaintiff did not raise any false claim and its claim was allowed. The plaintiff was not guilty of any misconduct. In this view of the matter, we are of the opinion that the Court below committed an error in not awarding costs and in our view, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit.46. The upshot of the above discussions is that the Court below was not justified in deducting Rs. 72 lakhs from the advance amount and as such the plaintiff is entitled to get back the entire advance amount of Rs. 255.25 lakhs paid by them with costs of the proceedings. The cross objection to that extent is to be allowed and the appeal is only to be dismissed. We see no reason to disallow costs of the proceedings in the cross objection.47. In the result:-(i) The appeal is dismissed.(ii) The cross objection is allowed in part.(iii) The impugned decree and judgment to the extent deducting Rs. 72 lakhs from the advance amount and declining costs of the suit are set aside.(iv) The impugned decree is modified as follows:“The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay Rs. 2,55,25,000/- (Rupees Two crores fifty five lakhs and twenty five thousand only) to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of the suit till realisation charged on the plaint schedule property with costs.”(v) The cross objector/plaintiff is entitled to the proportionate costs in the cross objection.(vi) The parties shall bear their respective costs in the appeal.
O R