w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-II v/s Ankit Garments Manufacturing Co.


Company & Directors' Information:- D R GARMENTS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101GJ2005PTC046010

Company & Directors' Information:- R. R. GARMENTS LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51900MH1995PLC095544

Company & Directors' Information:- ANKIT INDIA LIMITED [Active] CIN = L15500WB1981PLC033900

Company & Directors' Information:- S G GARMENTS LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101WB2004PLC098193

Company & Directors' Information:- INDIA MANUFACTURING CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24100DL2010PTC198947

Company & Directors' Information:- K K P GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65921TZ1994PTC005334

Company & Directors' Information:- B K GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2001PTC109850

Company & Directors' Information:- A K MANUFACTURING PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U51909MN1988PTC003110

Company & Directors' Information:- N K GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2000PTC107093

Company & Directors' Information:- K. D. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18109WB2005PTC101896

Company & Directors' Information:- G AND A GARMENTS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U18101PB1995PTC016121

Company & Directors' Information:- V H GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U52322MH2008PTC181066

Company & Directors' Information:- J D MANUFACTURING CO PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U51909WB1996PTC079825

Company & Directors' Information:- B R D MANUFACTURING PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51109WB1997PTC085188

Company & Directors' Information:- ANKIT INDIA LIMITED [Active] CIN = L51109WB1995PLC072855

Company & Directors' Information:- S. S. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL1996PTC083315

Company & Directors' Information:- B U MANUFACTURING PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U51109WB1982PTC035271

Company & Directors' Information:- M M MANUFACTURING PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U26922WB1993PTC059837

Company & Directors' Information:- S B MANUFACTURING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U31506WB1999PTC088567

Company & Directors' Information:- G. M. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18109DL2006PTC152683

Company & Directors' Information:- D AND D GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1975PTC007923

Company & Directors' Information:- J S GARMENTS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74900WB2009PTC135262

Company & Directors' Information:- K. B . GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18109WB2011PTC166954

Company & Directors' Information:- S M MANUFACTURING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U34300HR1997PTC057824

Company & Directors' Information:- G K MANUFACTURING PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U34300PB2012PTC036073

Company & Directors' Information:- A K GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17120DL2015PTC282847

Company & Directors' Information:- D P GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U18101DL2004PTC129479

Company & Directors' Information:- V S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC143084

Company & Directors' Information:- P AND P GARMENTS PVT LTD [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC143556

Company & Directors' Information:- V S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101HR2005PTC068124

Company & Directors' Information:- L. H. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U17121KA2011PTC060761

Company & Directors' Information:- K R GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U17111WB1998PTC087046

Company & Directors' Information:- T & A GARMENTS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U52321TN1993PTC025318

Company & Directors' Information:- P. S. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18204DL2007PTC164238

Company & Directors' Information:- S. A. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17121DL2007PTC165007

Company & Directors' Information:- R A MANUFACTURING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U36900HR2012PTC047669

Company & Directors' Information:- T S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51494DL1996PTC076668

Company & Directors' Information:- GARMENTS INDIA PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U51909GJ1979PTC003310

Company & Directors' Information:- K. S. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2007PTC164404

Company & Directors' Information:- B G GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL2005PTC142488

Company & Directors' Information:- S P GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U18101DL2003PTC120709

Company & Directors' Information:- P N GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51311DL2004PTC127524

Company & Directors' Information:- S T GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18109DL2015PTC277043

Company & Directors' Information:- P L GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17120DL2013PTC248417

Company & Directors' Information:- M. K. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17291DL2007PTC164395

Company & Directors' Information:- R A GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Converted to LLP and Dissolved] CIN = U18101DL2003PTC123385

Company & Directors' Information:- C S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC134787

Company & Directors' Information:- B L GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC136912

Company & Directors' Information:- B D S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC137898

Company & Directors' Information:- T G GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC143392

Company & Directors' Information:- G P S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED. [Active] CIN = U18101DL2006PTC149330

Company & Directors' Information:- G P GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2007PTC161067

Company & Directors' Information:- I B GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909DL2013PTC257044

Company & Directors' Information:- G P S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED. [Active] CIN = U74110DL2006PTC149330

Company & Directors' Information:- A G GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51300DL2013PTC257609

Company & Directors' Information:- V R V GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51311DL2008PTC182256

Company & Directors' Information:- M V GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74899HR2005PTC141797

Company & Directors' Information:- A AND R GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U17120HR2013PTC049037

Company & Directors' Information:- V K GARMENTS PRIVATE LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U18101DL1981PTC012410

Company & Directors' Information:- A S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17212CH1992PTC012350

Company & Directors' Information:- V R GARMENTS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U18101CH1991PTC011345

Company & Directors' Information:- S B GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51311DL2005PTC141954

    IT Appeal No. 511 of 2013

    Decided On, 26 November 2014

    At, High Court of Delhi

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO

    For the Appellant: Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel. For the Respondent: Ved Jain, Pranjal Srivastava, Advocates.



Judgment Text

Sanjiv Khanna, J.

1. The present appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) relates to assessment year 2008-09 and impugns the findings recorded by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) in their order dated 26th March, 2013. Findings recorded in the said order are primarily factual and it has been observed that the assessee had submitted copies of accounts duly confirmed by all trade creditors and debtors, whose balances were in excess of Rs.1 lac at the closing date of the year under consideration. The Tribunal accordingly set aside and quashed the order under Section 263 of the Act passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax.

2. The respondent-assessee is a partnership firm engaged in the business of readymade garments. Search and seizure proceedings were carried out under Section 132 of the Act on 16th October, 2007 in the case of Shri Dwarka Das Agarwal Group and search had also taken place in the business and residential premises of the respondent-assessee. Subsequently, a notice under Section 142(1) of the Act was issued and the respondent-assessee filed return on 2nd April, 2009, declaring the same income as was declared in its original return i.e. Rs.2,94,87,060/-.

3. The assessment records produced before us reveal that possibly no effective proceedings were held till 26th October, 2009. Order sheet for the said period is not available. Effectuate steps were taken for the first time by issue of notice dated 7th October, 2009, by the Assessing Officer under Section 142(1) of the Act, enclosing therewith a questionnaire going into nine closely typed pages asking for information on 24 questions/points. Some of the questions were also having sub questions. Voluminous data, confirmations and details were asked. One such direction was to furnish copies of accounts duly confirmed by all trade debtors and creditors, whose balances at the end of the year, were in excess of Rs.1 lac. The turnover of the assessee as declared in the return of income for the year in question was Rs.16,01,30,230/-. The assessee attended the proceedings, filed replies and other details. Hearings were held on 23rd November, 2009, 11th December, 2009, 15th December, 2009 and 29th December, 2009. Order sheets for proceedings held on 26th October, 2009 and thereafter till 23rd November, 2009 are not on record. However, the assessment records are bulky and show that numerous papers, confirmations, particulars, explanations etc. were furnished. Confirmations submitted by the respondent-assessee are more than 100 in number. The debtors and creditors, it was stated, were located all over India and the assessee had written and asked them for confirmations to be submitted to the department.

4. As noticed above, the last hearing before the Assessing Officer was held on 29th December, 2009. On the said date, the assessee had furnished several confirmations and documents.

5. In assessment order passed on 31st December, 2009, two additions of Rs.11,94,982/- and Rs.3,64,696/-, on account of discrepancies, were made.

6. The Assessing Officer, it is claimed by the revenue, had recorded the following office note:-

"Office Note

1. All the documents/materials seized/impound during the course of the search/survey operation conducted on 16.10.2007 in Dwarka Das Agarwal Group of cases have been examined and nothing adverse pertaining to this assessee in previous year under consideration; was noticed as a result thereof.

2. Copy of accounts of the assessee existing in this Circle have been verified from their respective assessment records and of the assessee's existing elsewhere are being sent to their respective AOs for necessary verification at their end.

3. During the course of the assessment, the assessee was required to produce copies of accounts duly confirmed by the concerned parties in respect of fresh loans/deposits as also in respect of debtors and creditors whose balances were in excess of Rs. 1 lac. Since all of such confirmed copies of accounts have not been filed so far and since the assessment in this case is getting barred by time today, the assessment in this case is completed subject to the condition that the same shall be reopened in case any discrepancy is noticed subsequently in the aforesaid accounts."

7. The Commissioner of Income Tax issued notice under Section 263 of the Act on the ground that the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue as the Assessing Officer had passed the assessment order despite noticing the fact that the assessee had not submitted confirmed copies of accounts in all cases (See paragraph 3 of the above office note).

8. Thereafter, the Commissioner of Income Tax, set aside the assessment for fresh assessment as per law after affording opportunity to the assessee and upon making proper inquires and verifications. The reasoning of the Commissioner of Income Tax in his order under Section 263 of the Act dated 27th March, 2012 reads:-

"It was observed that assessment has been completed by the Assessing Officer without obtaining the complete reply to the questionnaire annexed to notice u/s 142(1) dated 07/10/2009. In the above questionnaire, the assessee was inter alia asked to furnish copy of account, duly confirmed, of the parties from whom loans/deposits were given or taken and also in respect of debtors and creditors having balance above Rs.1 Lakh. The above information was not fully furnished by the assessee inspite of specific request. Provisions of Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 clearly lays down that where any sum is found credited in the books of an assessee and the assessee offers no explanation about the nature and source thereof, or the explanation offered is unsatisfactory, the sum so credited will be added to the income of the assessee. Since, the assessee had failed to furnish the confirmed copy of accounts till the fag end of the proceedings, inspite of specific request made by the Assessing Officer in the questionnaire annexed to notice u/s 142(1), the provisions of section 68 were attracted."

9. The Commissioner of Income Tax had documented the stand of the assessee that they had furnished confirmations from all trade creditors and debtors having a balance of Rs.1 lac and above. In the impugned order, the Tribunal has accepted that the assessee's contention that they had furnished confirmations of all the creditors and debtors having a balance of Rs.1 lac and above. The said finding was recorded by the tribunal after examining the assessment records, which were produced on directions before the Tribunal. In this factual background, it has been held that the Commissioner of Income Tax could not have exercised power under Section 263 of the Act. Thus the order of the Tribunal is that the Commissioner of Income Tax had proceeded on wrong facts and assumptions.

10. It is noticeable that in the grounds of appeal filed before us, names and details of a single creditor or debtor having a balance of Rs.1 lac or more from whom confirmation had not been furnished has not been indicated or stated. The order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263 also does not give names and details of any creditor or debtor who had not furnished or given confirmation. Thus, the finding of the Tribunal cannot be held to be perverse.

11. Learned senior standing counsel for the Revenue had submitted that confirmations were filed on the last day and, therefore, they were not verified. Thus, Commissioner of Income Tax was justified in holding that the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. The said contention must fail for a number of reasons. Firstly, with regard to the confirmations already submitted, note No.2 of the office note is relevant. It records that copy of the accounts of the confirming parties had been verified from their respective assessment records with the said Assessing Officer. In respect of the confirming assessees assessed under another charge, details had been sent to the respective Assessing Officer for verification at their end. It is not the allegation of the Revenue that on verification any of the conformation given by the creditors or debtors was found to be wrong or incorrect. Secondly, this is not the ground or reason why the Commissioner of Income Tax had invoked his power under Section 263 of the Act and passed the said order. The power and order under the said section is predicated that confirmations from all debtors and creditors were not furnished. The order does not proceed or hold that the Assessing Officer had failed to carry out required verification of the confirmations furnished and, therefore, the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. By accepting the arguments of the Revenue, we would be creating a new case, which was not the basis of the notice and the order under Section 263 of the Act.

12. It is unfortunate that in the present case, the Assessing Officer waited till the end and took up the assessment proceedings only three months before the end of the limitation period. A detailed questionnaire was only issued in October, 2009 and the first effective hearing was fixed on 26th October, 2009. Surprisingly, even the order sheets between 26th October, 2009 till 23rd November, 2009 are not on record and have not been shown. A reading of the questionnaire going into 9 pages would indicate that enormous and magnitudes of details/information were asked for. This would have required time for compilation, affirmation and clarification. The queries were answered by several letters on record. For confirmations, the assessee had to write letters to the creditors

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

and debtors all over the India and wait for their response. The Tribunal has noted that the assessee had submitted bill, invoices, vouchers etc. to the Assessing Officer. 13. Normally, scrutiny assessment order under Section 143(3) of the Act should be presumed and hypothesised as made after due verification and ascertainment of facts. Principle of finality has sound and salutatory basis, but can be disturbed as per the statute and within confines of the provision applicable. Therefore, it has to be ensured administratively that the Assessing Officer act and proceed promptly, keeping in mind the limitation period and also the factum that the assessee may require time to furnish details, confirmations etc. 14. In view of the finding of the Tribunal that the assessee had furnished confirmations from all debtors and creditors, with balances in excess of Rs.1 lac; a finding of fact that we do not see any reason to disturb, the present appeal by the Revenue has to be dismissed. We order accordingly. In the facts of the present case, there will be no order as to costs.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

04-03-2020 Ankit Ashok Jalan Versus Union of India & Others Supreme Court of India
02-03-2020 Ankit Bharti & Others Versus State of U.P. & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
28-02-2020 Khushi @ Samiksha Versus Ankit High Court of Punjab and Haryana
06-02-2020 Ankit Bhutani Versus Union of India High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
06-02-2020 Bank of Baroda V/S Ankit Singh and Others. Debts Recovery Tribunal Delhi
03-02-2020 Punjab National Bank V/S Ankit Agrawal and Others. Debts Recovery Tribunal Delhi
21-01-2020 Ankit Ghanshyam Mutha Versus Union of India Through Directorate of Revenue Intelligence & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
13-01-2020 Union of India rep. By its Enforcement Officer Enforcement Directorate Chennai Versus M/s. Raiments & Garments International, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-01-2020 M/s. Salsar Wires Manufacturing (P) Ltd, Through One Of Its Directors Sandip Goel Versus State Of Jharkhand, Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Jharkhand High Court of Jharkhand
03-01-2020 The General Manager, Aleppy Parcel Service, Alappuzha Versus Anil Kumar V., Managing Partner, Wetex Garments, Poovattuparamba, Kozhikode Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
02-01-2020 Ankit Agrawal & Others Versus State of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh
19-12-2019 Jayant Ghadia Versus Hindustan Tradex & Manufacturing Pvt. Ltd. & Others High Court of Delhi
22-11-2019 Union of India Through Joint Secretary (COFEPOSA), Ministry of Finance, New Delhi Versus Ankit Ashok Jalan Supreme Court of India
22-11-2019 The Management Scotts Garments Limited, Trippur Versus The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Coimbatore & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-11-2019 Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) Versus Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited High Court of Judicature at Bombay
14-10-2019 M/s. PJS Knit Garments, Rep.by its Partner, P. Sugansaran & Another Versus The Authorised Officer, Bank of Baroda, Tirupur Main Branch, Tirupur High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-08-2019 M/s. Indo Skins Garments Private Limited, Represented by its Managing Director, N. Thiagarajan, Chennai Versus The Presiding Officer, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
02-08-2019 Ankit Ashok Jalan Versus Union of India High Court of Delhi
24-07-2019 The Officer In Charge, Sub-Regional Provident Fund Office & Another Versus M/s Godavari Garments Limited Supreme Court of India
10-07-2019 Ankit Bahety Versus The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Another West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
09-07-2019 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkata Versus Ankit Metal & Power Ltd. High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
04-07-2019 Ankit Sarda Versus Subash Agarwal High Court of Sikkim
26-06-2019 For the Appellants: K.D. Chatterji, Senior Advocate, Amlesh Kumar Verma, Ankit Katriar, Advocates. For the Respondents: Subodh Kr. Jha, Pranav Kr. Jha, Advocates. High Court of Judicature at Patna
13-06-2019 Ankit Sarda Versus Nukul Bansal High Court of Sikkim
29-05-2019 Vandana Versus Ankit Bhardwaj High Court of Punjab and Haryana
20-05-2019 Dalip Singh Negi Versus Ankit Gupta High Court of Himachal Pradesh
05-04-2019 The District Collector, Kanchipuram Versus M/s. Gupta Garments, Rep. by its Authorized Signatory Anil Gupta & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-04-2019 M/s. Ginni Garments & Another Versus M/s. Sethi Garments & Others High Court of Punjab and Haryana
04-04-2019 Ginni Garments and Others V/S Sethi Garments and Others. In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
14-03-2019 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai Versus M/s. Saravana Selvarathnam Trading & Manufacturing Pvt. Ltd. High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-03-2019 The Senior Divisional Mechanical Engineer, Southern Railway, Salem Division & Others Versus M/s. Premier Garments Processing, Rep. by its Proprietor Ibrahim Sha, Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
07-03-2019 Raja Versus Ankit & Others High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Indore
15-01-2019 Ankit Mehta-Ex-Director of M/s. Janice Textiles Ltd. (now amalgamated) Versus Securities & Exchange Board of India SEBI Bhavan SEBI Securities amp Exchange Board of India Securities Appellate Tribunal
21-12-2018 Batra Garments Pvt. Ltd. Versus New India Assurance Co. Ltd. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
21-12-2018 Goodluck Garments Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & Cus., Surat-II High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
18-12-2018 G.F. College Through Its Principal Versus Ankit Srivastava & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
30-11-2018 New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Versus M/s. Ampoules & Vials Manufacturing Co. Ltd. High Court of Judicature at Bombay
16-11-2018 Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Ltd. & Another Versus Engineering Workers? Association & Others Supreme Court of India
23-10-2018 Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Represented by its Regional Manager, Ambattur Versus The Tamil Nadu Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd., Represented by its Branch Manger, Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-10-2018 Kamal Kumar Adopted Versus Ankit Kumar High Court of Rajasthan
24-09-2018 M/s. Premier Garments Processing, Rep. by its Proprietor, Ibrahim Sha, Chennai Versus The Divisional Railway Manager, Salem & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
24-09-2018 Ankit Versus State of Gujarat High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
18-09-2018 Ankit & Others Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others High Court of Himachal Pradesh
08-08-2018 Acit Circle-2(1), Gwalior Versus M/s Ankit Associates, Gwalior Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Agra
24-07-2018 Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd., (Now ECGC Limited), Chennai & Another Versus Zoro Garments Private Ltd., Rep.by its Managing Director, N.F. Mogrella High Court of Judicature at Madras
24-07-2018 Union of India & Another Versus M/s. Ankit Metal & Power Ltd. & Other High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
20-07-2018 Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Ltd. Versus Shree Coke Manufacturing Co. P. Ltd. National Company Law Tribunal Kolkata
13-07-2018 M/s. Rasathe Garments, Rep by its Partner, Virudhunagar Versus The Commercial Tax Officer-I, Virudhunagar High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-07-2018 Bord for Industrial & Financial Reconstruction (B.I.F.R.) Versus Coromandel Garments Ltd. & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
05-07-2018 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, CIT(A) & Another Versus M/s. BIESSE Manufacturing Company Ltd. High Court of Karnataka
27-06-2018 Ankit Dixit Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & Another High Court of Madhya Pradesh
22-06-2018 Titanium Equipment & Anode Manufacturing Company Ltd., Rep by its Director S. Jayakumar & Others Versus The State of Tami Nadu, Rep by the Principal Secretary to Government Highways & Minor Ports (HF2) Department, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
21-06-2018 M/s. DXN Herbal Manufacturing (India) Pvt. Ltd. Versus Income Tax Officer High Court of Judicature at Madras
21-05-2018 Ankit Mehta V/S C.C.E., Indore Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
01-05-2018 SEL Manufacturing Company Ltd. & Another Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Punjab and Haryana
11-04-2018 State Bank of India Versus Sel Manufacturing Company Limited National Company Law Tribunal Chandigarh
05-04-2018 The Manager (HRD) Hindustan Photo Films Manufacturing Company Ltd., Indu Nagar, Ootacamund, The Nilgiris Versus The Regional Labour Commissioner, (Central), The Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-04-2018 M/s. Sri Rengas Avitta Garments, Represented by its Partner, R. Rajaram & Another Versus R. Indira High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-04-2018 Kandukuri Garments Versus Inspector of Legal Metrology High Court of Karnataka
28-03-2018 Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited Versus Ravindra Shanta Sharma High Court of Judicature at Bombay
19-03-2018 Ankit Sarda Versus Subash Agarwal & Another High Court of Sikkim
01-03-2018 M/s. Leitwind Shiram Manufacturing Limited, Rep by its General Manager (Supply Chain) & Authorize Signatory V. Ravichandran Versus The Assistant/Deputy Commissioner of Customs (Gr.4), Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
08-02-2018 SCG Cement Co. Limited Versus Cement Manufacturing Company Limited Intellectual Property Appellate Board
06-02-2018 M/s. Biesse Manufacturing Co. Pvt. Ltd., Represented by its CFO K.V. Prashanth Versus State of Karnataka, Represented by the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes & Another High Court of Karnataka
16-01-2018 M/s. Kisankraft Machine Tools Pvt. Limited, Rep. by its Director Ankit Prakash Chitalia Versus The State of Karnataka, Rep. by its Finance Secretary & Others High Court of Karnataka
02-01-2018 A. Velumurugan Versus M/s. Sree Shiva Sakthi Garments, Represented by its Partner Venkatachalam, Tiruppur High Court of Judicature at Madras
12-12-2017 C.C.E. & S.T., Mangalore V/S Indian Plywood Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal South Zonal Bench At Bangalore
20-11-2017 The State of Tamilnadu, rep. by the Joint Commissioner (CT) Versus Tvl. Habib Leather Manufacturing Co., Madavaram High Court of Judicature at Madras
16-11-2017 Leitwind Sriram Manufacturing Ltd., Rep. by its General Manager, J. Sriram Versus R. Veeraputhiran Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
13-11-2017 Pawan Kumar Todi Versus Ankit Sarda High Court of Sikkim
02-11-2017 Forging Machinery Manufacturing Company V/S Commissioner of Central Excise & ST, Jallandhar Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal Chandigarh Bench
18-10-2017 Commissioner of Central Excise V/S Tal Manufacturing Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal West Zonal Bench At Mumbai
18-09-2017 Ankit Sharma Versus State & Another High Court of Delhi
27-07-2017 M/s. Ankit Ispat (P) Ltd., Karaikal Versus The Commissioner of Central Excise, Tiruchirappalli High Court of Judicature at Madras
26-07-2017 Creative Garments Pvt. Ltd V/S C.C.E. & S.T. Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal West Zonal Bench At Ahmedabad
30-06-2017 M/s. EMC Limited (Formerly known as Electrical Manufacturing Company Limited), Kolkata, rep. by its Managing Director Versus M/s. ICOMM Tele Limited, Rep. by its Deputy Manager & Another In the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad
30-06-2017 M/s. EMC Limited (Formerly known as Electrical Manufacturing Company Limited), Kolkata, Rep. by its Managing Director Versus M/s. ICOMM Tele Limited, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Deputy Manager & Another High Court of Andhra Pradesh
21-06-2017 Chinthakunta Rajesekhar Rao, Proprieto of Leela Borewells Screens Manufacturing Industries, Madanapalle Versus Venkata Sai & Co., Rep. by its Managing Partner Ganachari Hari & Another In the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad
09-06-2017 Ankit Exim Pvt. Ltd. and Others V/S C.C.E., New Delhi Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
08-05-2017 Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited Versus Dy. Commissioner of Income-Tax & Another Supreme Court of India
19-04-2017 M/s. Swapnil Hosieries & Textile Manufacturing Company Pvt. Ltd & Others Versus United Bank of India, Represented by its Chief Manager Debts Recovery Tribunal Ernakulam
18-04-2017 Taxila Business School Through Authorised Signatory Anuradha Mehta Versus Ankit Bhargav National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
20-03-2017 Hitachi K.K. Manufacturing Co V/S Commissioner of C. Ex., Kolkata-I Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal East Zonal Bench Bench, Kolkata
17-03-2017 Ankit P. Doshi Versus The District Collector, Tiruvellore & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-03-2017 Beach Towers Condominium & Another Versus Bombay Dyeing & Manufacturing Company Limited & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
10-02-2017 The Management of Foundation Garments Pvt. Ltd. Represented by its Managing Director ?Divine Grace? Versus Government of Tamil Nadu Labour & Employment (A1) Department, Represented by its Principal Secretary High Court of Judicature at Madras
07-02-2017 Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co., Ltd. & Another Versus N. Gowrishankar Telangana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hyderabad
23-01-2017 Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
19-01-2017 R.K. Rajkumar Proprietor M/s. Koghima Garments Versus The Registrar Debts Recovery Tribunal - III Spencer Towers Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
17-01-2017 Kitex Garments Ltd., represented by its Managing Director-Sabu M. Jacob Versus State of Kerala, represented by Principal Secretary To Government, Taxes (H) Department & Another High Court of Kerala
12-01-2017 Foundation Brake Kamgar Sanghatna Versus M/s. Foundation Brake Manufacturing Private Limited In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
02-01-2017 Sonal Garments V/S Commr. of Cus., Seaport (Import), Chennai Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal South Zonal Bench At Chennai
16-12-2016 Paul Parambi, Chief Promoter, Springs CHS Ltd. & Another Versus The Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. & Another High Court of Judicature at Bombay
07-12-2016 Pradeep Kumar Versus M/s. Rana Copy Manufacturing & Another High Court of Himachal Pradesh
18-11-2016 The Bombay Dyeing & Manufacturing Co.Ltd. Versus M/s. I.R. Enterprises High Court of Judicature at Bombay
25-10-2016 Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing (Tianjin) Co Ltd & Others Versus Anchor Health And Beauty Care Pvt Ltd High Court of Delhi
15-09-2016 M/s. Rasathe Garments Versus The Commercial Tax Officer-I (FAC) Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
02-09-2016 Carol Garments & Another Versus The Joint Director General of Foreign Trade, Coimbatore & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-07-2016 Ajanta Manufacturing Limited Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Another High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
08-07-2016 The Government of Karnataka, Bangalore & Another Versus The Indian Plywood Manufacturing Company Limited High Court of Karnataka