w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



CCE, Meerut-I V/S Amrit Varsha Ispat (P) Ltd. and Others.


Company & Directors' Information:- VARSHA CORPORATION LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24134MH2000PLC130217

    Appeal Nos. E/3246/2007, 217-220/2008 (Arising out of Order-in-Original No. 34/Commr/Mrt-I/2007 dated 31.07.2007 passed by Commissioner of CE, Meerut) and Final Order Nos. 50181-50185/2018

    Decided On, 18 January 2018

    At, Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal New Delhi

    By, THE HONORABLE JUSTICE: DR. SATISH CHANDRA (PRESIDENT) & THE HONORABLE JUSTICE: V. PADMANABHAN
    By, MEMBER

    For Petitioner: S. Sunil and Aalok Arora, Advocates And For Respondents: H. Saini, DR



Judgment Text


1. All the present appeals have been filed against the Order-in-Original No. 34/2007 dated 31.07.2007. Four appeals have been filed by the assessee as well as related parties, challenging the demand of Central Excise Duty as well as imposition of penalties on various persons. Revenue has also filed an appeal contending that the demand confirmed in the impugned order has omitted the month of November, 2001, which also falls within the extended period of 5 years.

2. The appellant-assessee is engaged in the manufacture of M.S. Ingots. Department received an intelligence regarding suppression of production by the manufacturers of M.S. Ingots in the form of a technical opinion of IIT Kanpur that an induction furnace unit should consume electricity in the range of 555 to 1046 units for the manufacture of 1 MT of MS ingots. To verify the same, the departmental officers called for the balance-sheet, income ledgers, documents relating to other income, electricity bills, etc for the period 2001-2006. After scrutiny of the details, the Revenue concluded that the assessee had consumed electricity in the range of 1395-2059 units for every 1 MT of MS Ingots. This was considered to be in excess of the suggested guideline by IIT Kanpur. It was further concluded that the selling price of the product of the appellant was below its cost and "other income" shown in the balance-sheet towards receipt by way of share trading and commodity trading were shown fictitiously. After conclusion of verification, SCN was issued and the impugned order was passed in which the assessee was held to have clandestinely cleared the finished products and the income generated from such clandestine clearance was being reflected in their balance-sheet as share trading and commodity trading. Accordingly, duty to the extent of Rs. 2.96 crores was demanded along with interest and penalty of equal amount. Penalties were also imposed on the Directors and other connected persons. Aggrieved by the impugned order, the present appeals have been filed.

3. With the above background, we heard Shri S. Sunil, Advocate on behalf of the appellants as well as Shri H. Saini, DR.

4. The Ld. Counsel for the appellants argued the case as summarized below:

i) The transactions relating to share trading, commodity trading etc., were duly entered in the financial accounts of the appellant, and were reflected in their IT returns, and were also duly audited by their CA.

ii) The raw material purchases, as well as sales of final products were duly accounted by the assessee for in its records.

iii) There was no evidence of any receipt, by the appellant, of unaccounted raw material.

iv) There was no evidence, or allegation, of disposal, by the appellant, of unaccounted ingots.

v) There was no evidence of any clandestine transportation either of inputs or of finished products, and no seizure thereof either.

vi) Electricity consumption depended on various factors.

vii) Consumption of electricity could not, therefore, be the sole basis to allege clandestine removal.

viii) The requisite evidence to establish clandestine removal, was not forthcoming.

ix) The report of Prof. N.K. Batra could not be relied upon, as his credentials were unknown; besides; the report was vague in many respects.

x) Cross examination of the persons whose statements had been relied upon in the SCN, as also of Dr. Batra, was requested, but not permitted.

xi) Since no experiment of electricity consumption was conducted by Revenue in the appellant's factory, no inference can be drawn against the appellant insofar as electricity consumption is concerned in production of M.S. Ingots (final product).

xii) Taking stock of identical contentions, advanced in the context of identical allegations, this Hon'ble Tribunal had, in a self-speaking judgment in R.A. Castings Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE, 2009 (237) ELT 674 (T) held that no finding of clandestine removal could be returned. The said judgment was successively upheld by the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in CCE v. R.A. Casting Pvt. Ltd., : 2012 (26) STR 262 (All.) and by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, by dismissal of the SLP of the Revenue, filed thereagainst vide 2011 (269) ELT A1006 (SC).

xiii) The said decisions have also been subsequently followed by this Hon'ble Tribunal, while allowing an appeal involving identical circumstances, in Trikoot Iron & Steel Casting Ltd. v. CCE, : 2015 (315) ELT 65 (Tri. Del).

xiv) Following R.A. Casting (supra), the CCE has also, in the appellant's own case, dropped the demand for the subsequent period, vide O-in-O dated 28.02.2013.

5. The Ld. DR justified the impugned order. He submitted that the Revenue's appeal is for inclusion of the clearances for the month of November, 2001 also in the demand. He submitted that the share and commodity trading are nothing but fictitious transactions shown to cover up the receipts from clandestine clearances. The price of the final product has been shown by the appellant less than the cost of the item. Accordingly, he submitted that the case has been made not only on the basis of the report of IIT Kanpur; but other evidences also.

6. We have heard both sides and perused appeal record. We find that the Revenue's entire case is based upon the investigations conducted by them in respect of entries made in the balance-sheet. The said entries reflect income of the appellant made through other businesses like share trading, sales commission and commodity trading. It is not disputed on record that income reflected in the balance-sheet stands included by the assessee for payment of Income Tax. Such Income Tax Returns have also been assessed by the Income Tax Department. The said returns have also been audited by their statutory auditor. We would like to observe that Central Excise authorities have no jurisdiction to interfere in the orders passed by Income Tax authorities and to hold that transactions which stand accepted by the Income Tax authorities were not genuine transactions. The Tribunal in the case of R.A. Casting Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE Meerut-I [2009 (237) ELT 674 (Tri.)] has dealt with an identical question. By referring to the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court decision in the case of Arabian Express Line Ltd. Vs. Union of India : 1995 ITR 31], it stands held by the Tribunal that law does not entitle the Revenue to disregard all the statutory excise records as well as audited financial accounts and records of the assessee-company, which have been duly verified and accepted by the competent authorities from time to time not only for Central Excise but also for purposes of Income Tax etc. It was further held that the Central Excise authorities have no jurisdiction to examine or determine whether the share transactions of the assessee company are genuine or not and whether the income from share trading duly verified, accepted and assessed to Income Tax authorities could be disregarded by them so as to treat the same as proceeds of ingots alleged to have been clandestinely produced and sold by the appellant s. The entire action of the Revenue was held to be without jurisdiction.

7. The said decision of the Tribunal in the case of R.A. Casting Pvt. Ltd. (supra) Stands confirmed by the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court, when the appeal filed by the Revenue was rejected. Further, the appeal by the Revenue before the Hon'ble Supreme Court also stands rejected. The said decision of the Tribunal was followed in several cases including in the case of Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise Vs. Venus Allows Pvt. Ltd. [Final Order No. A/348/2012-Ex(DB) dated 20.03.2012] as also in the case of R.K. Polytubes & Ors. Vs. CCE, Raipur [Final Order No. A/50276-50277/2014-Ex(DB) dated 17.01.2014] and also in M/s. Trikoot Iron and Steel casting case (supra).

8. Apart from th

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

e above, we note that virtually no evidence is produced by the Revenue as regards the clandestine manufacture and clearances of appellants final product. It is well settled law that the allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal are required to be proved by production of sufficient evidence in the shape of production of raw material, the actual manufacture of the goods, transportation of the same or in the shape of identification of the buyers. There is no statement of any persons indicating or admitting that income as reflected by the appellants in balance sheet stands derived from clandestine activities of manufacturer and clearance of their final products. 9. Accordingly, the impugned order is set-aside. The appeal filed by Revenue is dismissed and all the others by the assessee and connected persons are allowed. (Pronounced in Court on 18.01.2018)
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

18-11-2019 Anand Rao Korada Resolution Professional Versus M/s. Varsha Fabrics (P) Ltd. & Others Supreme Court of India
17-07-2019 Atul Gulati & Another Versus Varsha Mehra & Others High Court of Delhi
28-06-2019 The Branch Manager, Future General India Insurance Company Limited, Rep. by Senior Manager & Others Versus S.L. Varsha & Others High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
30-04-2019 Varsha Versus Kamlesh & Another High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Indore
10-04-2019 Varsha Garg & Another Versus State of MP. & Others High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Indore
03-12-2018 M/s. Varsha Polymers, Ernakulam, Represented by Its Partner P.J. Eldhos & Others Versus M/s. Vajra Plastics Industry, Ernakulam, Represented by Its Managing Partner, M.M. Paulose & Another High Court of Kerala
03-12-2018 M/s. Varsha Polymers, Ernakulam, Represented by Its Partner P.J. Eldhos & Others Versus M/s. Vajra Plastics Industry, Campannur, Ernakulam District, Its Managing Partner M. M. Paulose & Another High Court of Kerala
23-07-2018 Ashu Gutpa Versus Varsha Jain High Court of Delhi
19-07-2018 Varsha Thakur Versus The State of Maharashtra & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
06-07-2018 Varsha Gautham Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Delhi
01-06-2018 Radhey Shyam Versus Varsha Yadav High Court of Delhi
22-03-2018 S.V. Varsha Versus M/s. IFFCO TOKIO Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd., Bengaluru & Another High Court of Karnataka
14-02-2018 The Marathwada Legal and General Education Society Through its Secretary Dr. Kalpalata Patil Bharaswadkar & Another Versus Varsha Manohar Dhongade & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
11-01-2018 Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus Varsha Associates National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
22-12-2017 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Rep., by its Divisional Manager Versus M/s. Varsha Aqua Farm Sarvasiddi, Rep., by its Managing Partner In the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad
20-12-2017 Varsha Versus The Marathwada Legal and General Education Society (Through Its Secretary J.K. Vasadikar) & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
21-09-2017 Vinay Kumar Versus Varsha High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
11-08-2017 Raghunath Versus Maharashtra Gramin Bank, Head Office, Near Hotel Varsha Inn, CIDCO & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
25-07-2017 Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co Ltd. Versus Varsha Rajendra Pache & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
09-06-2017 Varsha Ramesh Chavan & Others Versus Union of India through the Secretary of Ministry of Law and Justice Dept. of Legal Affairs of India, Government of India & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
02-05-2017 Varsha Agarwal Versus Sushil Kumar Agarwal High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
10-01-2017 The State of Maharashtra Versus Varsha Shankarrao Phadke High Court of Judicature at Bombay
30-06-2016 Varsha Versus The Assistant Registrar of Co-Operative Societies, Kundapura, Udupi Taluk and District & Others High Court of Karnataka
05-04-2016 Varsha Santosh Birajdar & Others Versus Sujata Ashok Pokharkar & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
18-03-2016 Varsha K. Sawant & Others Versus The Chief Secretary, Government of Goa State & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
14-03-2016 Arvind Bhaurao Thakre Versus Varsha Arvind Thakre High Court of Madhya Pradesh
14-03-2016 Arvind Bhaurao Thakre Versus Varsha Arvind Thakre High Court of Madhya Pradesh
17-12-2015 National Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus Mrs. Ratnamala alias Varsha Vasantrao Deshmukh & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
03-07-2015 Prakash and Ors. Versus Varsha Sharad Parwekar and Ors. In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
03-07-2015 Prakash & Others Versus Varsha Sharad Parwekar & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
17-06-2015 Minor Varsha Sadasivan Versus The Registrar, MGR Medical University & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
26-05-2015 Varsha Gajjar Versus Dr. Tiwari's Maternity & Nursing Home & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
23-03-2015 Abhinav Vishwakarma Versus Varsha Vishwakarma & Another High Court of Madhya Pradesh
03-02-2015 Shivaji Rao Gaikwad Versus M/s. Varsha Productions High Court of Judicature at Madras
09-12-2014 M/s. Varsha Enterprise Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & S.T., Vapi Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal West Zonal Bench At Ahmedabad
14-10-2014 Arun Narayanrao Marathe V/S Varsha Arun Marathe In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
14-10-2014 Arun Versus Varsha & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
21-07-2014 Varsha Ramesh Chavan, Mumbai & Others Versus The Union of India, Through the Secretary, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Bombay Bench Mumbai
19-06-2014 Varsha Laxman Deshpande Versus The Municipal Commissioner & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
05-05-2014 Nagpur Shikshan Mandal, through its Secretary & Another Versus Varsha Vinod Sayam & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
31-03-2014 M/s. Varsha Polyproducts Pvt. Limited & Others Versus Commissioner of Customs Kandla Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal West Zonal Bench At Ahmedabad
19-03-2014 Dr. Pravin Versus Sau. Varsha Shankar Rathod Maharshtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Nagpur
30-01-2014 Nitin Parekh, M/s Varsha Polyproducts Pvt.Ltd. Versus CC. Kandla Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal West Zonal Bench At Ahmedabad
23-01-2014 C. Chandramohan & Another versus Varsha & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
09-01-2014 Smt. Varsha Versus Smt. Vandana Kishore Tode In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
19-11-2013 Vikrant Sudhakar Ambhore & Another Versus Varsha Vikrant Ambhore In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
30-10-2013 Varsha R. Taurani Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax 19(1), Mumbai Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Mumbai
18-10-2013 Varsha Sanjay Shinde & Others Versus The Society of Friends of the Sassoon Hospitals & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
04-09-2013 Varsha Sathees & Others Versus State of Assam, Represented by the Commissioner & Secretary to the Government of Assam, Health & Family Welfare Department Dispur & Others High Court of Gauhati
15-02-2013 Rajendra Baburao Mahale Versus Varsha Mahesh Dangarekar & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
29-01-2013 Prakash Versus Sau. Varsha In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
06-11-2012 Varsha Versus Manager, Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. High Court of Madhya Pradesh
22-05-2012 Ujjain Development Authority & Another Versus Varsha & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
05-03-2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax- II Nashik Versus Smt. Varsha Dilip Kolhe In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
02-03-2012 Varsha Bhimrao Rasal Versus The State of Maharashtra High Court of Judicature at Bombay
05-12-2011 Sri Krishna Textiles, rep. by its Proprietor Kusumanchi Syamprasada Rao Versus Sri Varsha Chits and Finance Rep by its Managing Partner W.V.Ramamohan Rao & Others Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hyderabad
16-08-2011 Varsha Versus Divisional Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee & Others Supreme Court of India
05-05-2011 Jaishree Versus Varsha Dealers & Others High Court of Madhya Pradesh
01-02-2011 Mrs. Varsha A. Maheshwari Versus M/s. Bhushan Steel Limited & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
05-01-2011 M/s. Bhushan Steel Limited, through its Power of Attorney Holder S.K. Agrawal Versus Mrs. Varsha A. Maheshwari, through her Power of Attorney Ajay Maheshwari In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
22-12-2010 Sau.Varsha Ravindra Isai Versus Sow. Rajashri Rajkumar Chaudhari & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
01-12-2010 Kum. Varsha d/o Mahadu Wagh Versus The State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary, Tribal Development Department & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
04-08-2010 Sh. Hardev Singh Sokhi S/o Sardar Laxman Singh Sokhi Versus Ms. Varsha Sehgal High Court of Delhi
02-07-2010 State Bank of India, rep. by its Asst. Genl. Manager Versus Mangilal Jain, Prop., Varsha Overseas Inc., High Court of Judicature at Madras
03-06-2010 Varsha Kapoor Versus Uoi & Others High Court of Delhi
20-03-2010 Payal Chouhan @ Varsha Versus State Of Mp. High Court of Madhya Pradesh
05-03-2010 Varsha Mahavra Versus Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board & Others High Court of Delhi
24-04-2009 Varsha Priya Versus Dr. Sushma Pandey & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
05-02-2009 M/s Varsha Plastics Pvt. Ltd. & Another Versus Union of India & Others Supreme Court of India
12-01-2009 Varsha Kochar Versus Biku Sarmah & Another Supreme Court of India
25-11-2008 Varsha w/o Pravin Patil Versus Pravin Madhukar Patil In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
12-09-2008 Smt. Jyoti w/o Vasantrao Butle Versus Mrs. Varsha Aniruddha Bansod In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
12-09-2008 Smt. Jyoti w/o Vasantrao Butle Versus Mrs. Varsha Aniruddha Bansod In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
26-08-2008 Smt Varsha wd/o Baba Itankar Versus State of Maharashtra In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
29-11-2007 Varsha Vilas Mhapankar & Others Versus Asst. Provident Fund Commissioner, Wagle Estate, Thane (W) Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Mumbai
02-07-2007 Smt. Varsha Rubin T. Zaveri Versus Shri Pannalal Khimji Chheda & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
22-03-2007 P. Pundalik Kamath Versus Madgaum Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd., through its Chairman, with Office at Varsha & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
17-11-2006 Smt. Varsha Rani Nag V/S Herald Vinay Nadan In The High Court Of Chhattisgarh At Bilaspur
03-10-2006 Varsha Shyam Amlani Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
26-05-2006 Dr. Varsha Gautam W/O Dr. Rajesh Gautam v/s State Of U.P. & others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
25-04-2006 VARSHA RAMSING DHANAVAT VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA High Court of Judicature at Bombay
01-12-2005 Harish Commercial Premises Co-op Soc. Ltd. Versus Smt. Varsha Dinesh Joshi & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
21-10-2004 Kamakshi Enterprises Versus Varsha R. Pandit & Others Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Mumbai
16-10-2004 Vyankati Raghobaji Parbat & Another Versus Sau. Varsha w/o. Vinod Deshpande & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
14-07-2003 Neelkamal Builders Versus Dr. Varsha Rohidas Kalamkar Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Mumbai
10-02-2003 Varsha w/o Ashok Sharma Versus Vanmala w/o Prakash Sonone & Another High Court of Judicature at Bombay
12-08-2002 Varsha Paresh Shah Versus Paresh H. Shah Supreme Court of India
02-11-2001 Bihar State Agricultural Marketing Board Versus Amrit Varsha Hindi Dainik and Another Supreme Court of India
18-12-2000 Mrs. Varsha S. Metha and Another Versus Day Mar Apparels Private Limited And Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
03-03-2000 Varsha Shrivastava Versus State of Madhya Pradesh High Court of Madhya Pradesh
29-02-2000 Amrit Varsha Hindi Dainik Versus Bihar State Agriculture Marketing Board High Court of Bihar
06-01-2000 Dilip Deshlehra Versus Varsha Gyanwani High Court of Madhya Pradesh
29-10-1999 Varsha Spinning Mills Limited Versus Petitioner High Court of Delhi
16-10-1998 Amrit Varsha Hindi Dainik Versus Bihar State Agriculture Marketing Board High Court of Bihar
07-05-1997 Smt. Varsha w/o Baliram Kamble Versus Shantabai w/o Zatingrao Kamble & others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
28-10-1994 Varsha Spinning Mills Ltd. Versus State of Haryana High Court of Punjab and Haryana
01-05-1994 Varsha Poly Products Private Limited Versus C.C. Kandia High Court of Delhi
04-04-1994 Sanjay Kumar Talwar Versus Varsha Promoters And Developers High Court of Delhi
04-04-1994 Sanjay Kumar Talwar Versus Varsha Promoters And Developers High Court of Delhi
05-08-1993 Dr. Ms. Varsha Shredhar Ambalkar Versus State of Maharashtra and others High Court of Judicature at Bombay