w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Birla International Pvt. Ltd. v/s Karvy Financial Services Limited


Company & Directors' Information:- KARVY FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U67190MH2001PLC227379

Company & Directors' Information:- BIRLA CORPORATION LIMITED [Active] CIN = L01132WB1919PLC003334

Company & Directors' Information:- I SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72900DL2003PTC118851

Company & Directors' Information:- BIRLA FINANCIAL CORPORATION LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65923MH1991PLC060619

Company & Directors' Information:- INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD [Active] CIN = U67120MH2006PLC159604

Company & Directors' Information:- L T INTERNATIONAL LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1999PLC097892

Company & Directors' Information:- A. INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51102GJ2008PTC053840

Company & Directors' Information:- AT FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED [Active] CIN = U67190MH2013PLC243267

Company & Directors' Information:- BIRLA INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U99999MH1963PTC012630

Company & Directors' Information:- K. A. INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51101UP2012PTC049338

Company & Directors' Information:- T. INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U72900DL1997PTC091049

Company & Directors' Information:- SERVICES INTERNATIONAL LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1996PLC075146

Company & Directors' Information:- P V INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1998PTC094598

Company & Directors' Information:- INTERNATIONAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74899DL2005PTC075007

Company & Directors' Information:- BIRLA FINANCIAL SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74999MH2015PTC260759

Company & Directors' Information:- SERVICES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74140DL1996PTC078465

Company & Directors' Information:- INTERNATIONAL SERVICES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U51311WB1955PTC022281

Company & Directors' Information:- F I SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74999DL2001PTC113001

    Appeal No. 328 of 2015 in Arbitration Petition No. 1643 of 2014

    Decided On, 14 January 2016

    At, High Court of Judicature at Bombay

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP V. MOHTA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. KULKARNI

    For the Appellants: Dr. Birendra Saraf, Chinmayee Pendse i/b. Vidhii Partners, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mayur Khandeparkar, Omkar Khaiyam Shaikh i/b. Vikas Salvi & Associates, Advocates.



Judgment Text

G.S. Kulkarni, J.

1. This appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996 (for short 'the Act'), arises from the decision of the learned Single Judge dated 6th April,2015 in Arbitration Petition No.1643 of 2014, filed by the Appellants under Section 34 of the Act, whereby the challenge to the Arbitral Award has failed before the learned Single Judge.

2. Dr.Saraf, learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants in assailing the impugned order submits that in respect of the Appellants property which was mortgaged with the Respondent, Court Receiver was appointed by an order passed under Section 9 of the Act. The submission is that the Respondents could not have made a monetory claim for the entire amount in the Arbitration Proceedings inasmuch as the Respondent was required to file an independent suit for foreclosure of mortgage under Section 67 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 read with Order XXXIV of the Civil Procedure Code.

3. The second contention as urged by Dr.Saraf, learned Counsel for the Appellants is that there was a Memorandum of Understanding dated August, 2013 between the Appellants and the Respondent by virtue of which the learned Arbitrator could not have proceeded on the original agreement between the parties and ought to have terminated the arbitration proceedings, and thus, on this count also the arbitration proceedings before the learned Arbitrator were vitiated.

4. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties. We have also perused the impugned order and the documents so relied upon and referred by the learned Counsel during the arguments.

5. It is an admitted position that the Appellants did not file any written statement before the learned Arbitrator, though the Appellants were served notices from time to time by the learned Arbitrator. Although the Advocate for the Appellants appeared before the learned Arbitrator, adjournments were taken on the ground of settlement and though there was no settlement arrived at between the parties, the Appellants did not file any written statement. Subsequently, the Appellants did not appear before the learned Arbitrator. The learned Arbitrator, therefore, proceeded on the pleadings filed on behalf of the Respondent and the documents produced on record and rendered his Award. It is, therefore, clear that the learned Arbitrator proceeded in consonance with the principles of natural justice in recording the finding of facts, after giving complete opportunity to the Appellants to file written statement. It is also clear that in the absence of a written statement, the claims made by the Respondent were deemed to have been admitted.

6. As regards the contention of Dr.Saraf that the Respondents ought to have filed an independent suit in regard to the mortgaged property and could not have made a monetary claim in the Arbitration Proceedings, in our view cannot be accepted. The Respondent had raised a monetary claim in the Arbitration Proceedings in regard to the amount due and payable by the Appellants. The learned Arbitrator had adjudicated on the liability of the Appellants as regards the amount due and payable, to the Respondent under the contract. The issue as regards the mortgaged property was not the issue before the learned Arbitrator neither the same was raised by the Appellants before the learned Arbitrator. In any event the Respondent had all the rights in law to realize the claim amount by exercising the rights accrued to them under the mortgage, as per the provisions of Section 67 of the Transfer of Property Act, at any time after the amount had become due and payable from the appellants and/or before a decree for redemption of the mortgaged property could be obtained by the appellants-mortgagor. Admittedly no suit for redemption of the mortgage has been filed on behalf of the Appellants. The plea that the Receiver has been appointed under Section 9 of the Act is also of no avail in view of the provisions of Section 69A of the Transfer of Property Act,1882 which clearly provides for appointment of Receiver at the behest of the mortgagee. We, therefore, do not find any error in the impugned order rejecting the submissions as urged on behalf of the Appellants on this count. We also cannot accept this submission of Dr.Saraf that in view of the mortgage the respondents were precluded from invoking the arbitration qua the monetary claim as made in the arbitration proceedings as we find no legal basis to sustain this submission, neither any such position in law has been pointed out to us.

7. As regards the contention that the learned Arbitrator ought to have terminated the arbitration proceedings in view of the Memorandum of Understanding dated August,2013 in view of the provisions of Section 30(2) of the Act and that the learned Arbitrator could not have proceeded to pass an Award, in our view, is also untenable, in view of the clear understanding between the parties as recorded in clause 7 of the Memorandum of Understanding which reads thus:

'7. No prejudice

{a} This MOU is in addition to and supplemental to the Facility. Documents and any other related Document thereto and does not prejudice the Facility Documents or any of their respective provisions in any manner.

{(b} All Facility Documents executed by the Lender, the Borrowers and the Security Provider will continue to be valid in force and binding on the respective parties thereof and the Lender will be free to enforce its rights under such Facility Documents in accordance with the terms thereof.

{c} This MOU and the performance of the obligations contained hereunder will not affect or prejudice in any manner whatsoever any legal or other proceedings initiated by the Lender against any Borrower of the Security Provider or any proceedings initiated by the Lender against any Borrower or the Security Provider before any court, tribunal, arbitral panel or other forum and all such proceedings will continue unabated however till the time the borrower or the Security provider continues to make payment as per the schedule, KARVY Financial Services Limited shall main

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

tain a 'STATUS QO' on the legal cases initiated and wold not press for any such action in court, which will dilute the terms and conditions of the MOU in principal and in spirit.' 8. The findings of the learned Arbitrator on facts and in law have been accepted in totality by the learned Single Judge, in refusing to interfere in the jurisdiction vested under Section 34 of the Act. In view of the above discussion, we see no reason to interfere with the orders passed by the learned Single Judge in exercise of our appellate jurisdiction under Section 37 of the Act. 9. The appeal is devoid of any merit and is accordingly rejected. No order as to costs.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

29-06-2020 Aakash Educational Services Ltd. Versus Sahib Sital Singh Bajwa & Others High Court of Delhi
29-06-2020 Coromandel International Ltd. (Earlier Known As Coromandel Fertillisers Ltd.) Through its Authorized Representative, Vishakhapatnam & Others Versus Kamrubai & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
26-06-2020 Arshleen Grewal Versus Worldwide Immigration Consultancy Services Limited, Punjab & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
26-06-2020 IRCON International Ltd. Versus M/s. Meumal Athwani High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
25-06-2020 Dr. S. Anusha Versus The Director of Medical and Health Services, Teynampet, Chennai & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
25-06-2020 Pro Interactive Services India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commisioner of Central Goods & Services Tax Delhi South & Another High Court of Delhi
23-06-2020 M/s. Angelique International Limited Versus Public Electricity Corporation & Others High Court of Delhi
16-06-2020 M/s. Sbi Cards & Payments Services Ltd., New Delhi Versus Vishal Sabharwal & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
12-06-2020 Aberdeen Asia Pacific Including Japan Equity Fund Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-1(1)(1) & Another High Court of Judicature at Bombay
05-06-2020 Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited Versus BDR Pharmaceuticals International Pvt. Ltd. & Another High Court of Delhi
04-06-2020 Goods & Services Tax Network, New Delhi & Others Versus M/s. Leo Distributors, Thrissur & Others High Court of Kerala
01-06-2020 Sri Vinayaka Caterors & Consultants, Partnership Firm, Represented by its Partners, K. Eshwar Versus The Executive Warden, International Hostels, Anna University, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-06-2020 Aditya Birla Money Limited, Rep. By its Head – Legal & Compliance, L.R. Murali Krishnan Versus The National Stock Exchange of India Limited, Investors Services Cell, Kotturpuram & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-06-2020 Dr. G. Gowthaman Versus The Joint Director, Medical & Rural Health Services, Tiruppur & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-05-2020 M/s. Shriram Capital Limited, A Limited Company represented by its Vice-President, N. Mani Versus The Director of Income Tax, (International Taxation) & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
08-05-2020 The Management of M/s. Recipharm Pharma Services Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by Assistant General Manager Versus G. Vasanthkumr & Others High Court of Karnataka
05-05-2020 B. Abimathi Versus The Director General of Health Services, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
04-05-2020 Bhansali Productions Pvt.Ltd. Versus Eros International Medial Ltd. & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
04-05-2020 Priyambada Devi Birla & Birla Corporation Ltd. Versus Arvind Kumar Newar & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
01-05-2020 M/s. Inter Ads Exhibition Pvt. Ltd. Versus Busworld International Cooperatieve Vennootschap Met Beperkte Anasprakelijkheid High Court of Delhi
30-04-2020 Banyan Tree Growth Capital L.L.C. Versus Axiom Cordages Limited (Previously Known as Axion Impex International Ltd.) & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
28-04-2020 Flemingo Travel Retail Limited, Having Registered Office at Turbhe, Navi Mumbai, Represented by Its Authorised Signatory Nixon Varghese Versus Kannur International Airport Limited, Mattannur, Represented by Its Managing Director & Another High Court of Kerala
21-04-2020 Mahadeo Construction Co. at Chhatarpur, Palamau Through its partner Anil Kumar Singh Versus The Union of India through the Commissioner, Central Goods & Services Tax, Ranchi & Others High Court of Jharkhand
20-04-2020 M/s. Halliburton Offshore Services Inc. Versus Vedanta Limited & Another High Court of Delhi
08-04-2020 N. Rajagopal Versus The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, Department of Financial Services, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-04-2020 In Re : COVID 19 - Relief & Services at the Andaman & Nicobar Islands High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
18-03-2020 Union of India Versus Bharat Biotech International Ltd. & Others High Court of Delhi
18-03-2020 Carewell Security Services Private Limited Versus Employees Provident Fund Organization High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Indore
17-03-2020 Aman Bhatnagar Versus Falcon Reality Services P. Ltd. & Others Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission New Delhi
13-03-2020 Dr. Rajesh Jhorawat Versus Life Cell International Pvt. Ltd., Kancheepuram & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
13-03-2020 M/s. Shriram Capital Limited, A Limited Company represented by its Vice-President, N. Mani Versus The Director of Income Tax, (International Taxation) & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
12-03-2020 Joshi Technologies International, Inc-India Projects Versus Union of India High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
11-03-2020 M/s. Meyer Apparel Ltd. Versus M/s. Panchanan International Pvt. Ltd. High Court of Delhi
11-03-2020 M/s. Chase Security Services, through its proprietor Ravindra Prabhakar Sawant & Another Versus State of Goa, Through the Chief Secretary, Government of Goa, Goa Secretariat & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
09-03-2020 Citi-financial Retail Services India Ltd., Rep. by its Assistant Manager-Collections J. Srikumar Versus Dove Finance Ltd., Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-03-2020 Uttam Datta Versus Proprietor, International Trading Co. & Another West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
03-03-2020 In The Matter of:D & I Taxcon Services Private Limited Versus Vinod Kumar Kothari, Liquidator of Nicco Corporation Limited National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
02-03-2020 Scindia Potteries & Services Pvt. Ltd. Versus Ankur Jain & Others High Court of Delhi
28-02-2020 Vasant Mishrilal Parakh & Others Versus TATA Capital Financial Services Ltd. & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
28-02-2020 Seed Works International Pvt., Ltd. & Another Versus Banothu Rangamma & Others Telangana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hyderabad
28-02-2020 M/s. Techno Global Services Pvt. Ltd. & Another Versus National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Others West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
27-02-2020 M/s. ASR Dredging Services Private Limited, Represented by its Managing Director, Kochi Versus M/s. Chennai Post Trust, Rep. by its Chairman, Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-02-2020 M/s. Popular Vehicles & Services Ltd., Manjeri & Others Versus Muhammed Riyas. P, Kismath Manzil, Thurakkal, Manjeri & Others Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
27-02-2020 Perfect Synergy Advisory Pvt. Ltd. Versus Sagar Infra Rail International Limited & Others High Court of Delhi
27-02-2020 World Wide Immigration Consultancy Services Ltd. & Others Versus Rajiv Negandhi West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
24-02-2020 M. Muthusamy Versus The Director of Medical and Rural Services, DMS Compound, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
24-02-2020 Saurabh Kar & Another Versus Kolkata West International City Pvt. Ltd. & Another West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
18-02-2020 IL & FS Financial Services Ltd. V/S SKIL Infrastructure Limited & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
14-02-2020 APS Forex Services Private Limited Versus Shakti International Fashion Linkers & Others Supreme Court of India
14-02-2020 Seed Works International Pvt., Ltd., Rep. by its Finance Controller, TN Rajan & Another Versus Banothu Tharya & Another Telangana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hyderabad
14-02-2020 TEK Systems Global Services Pvt. Ltd. Versus Naveen Kumar Mamidala High Court of for the State of Telangana
12-02-2020 Assistant Divisional Officer, Kerala Fire & Rescue Services, Kozhikode & Others Versus Vijayalakshmi & Others High Court of Kerala
11-02-2020 Shouvik Bhattacharya Versus A2 Services & Others West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
11-02-2020 M/s. Anusha Enterprises Rep.by its Managing Partner C.K.Nafrasimha Rao, Chennai Versus Government of India, Department of Atomic Energy General Services Organisation Kalpakkam & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
11-02-2020 Anupam Basu & Another Versus M/s. A 2 Services & Others West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
11-02-2020 Ircon International Limited Versus C.R. Sons Builders & Development Pvt. Ltd. & Another High Court of Delhi
07-02-2020 Swastik Builders, Satyam Apartments Next to Rowell Continental (Sunny International) & Others Versus Dr. Shobha & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
06-02-2020 Mahesh Kumar Sharma Versus The Principal, Vidya Niketan Birla Public School, Pilani District Jhunjhunu & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
05-02-2020 M/s. Texcel International Pvt. Ltd., Sengundram Industrial Area (Near Ford India Ltd.,), Chengalpattu Versus M/s. Chennai Steel Tubes, Rep.by one of its Partner, G. Bhavanishankar High Court of Judicature at Madras
05-02-2020 The Chairman and Managing Director, Worldwide Immigration Consultancy Services & Another Versus Antara Majumdar & Others West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
31-01-2020 Verizon Data Services India Private Limited, Rep. by its Director, S. Ramakrishnan, Chennai Versus The Authority for Advance Rulings, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
31-01-2020 Amazon Seller Services Pvt. Ltd. & Others Versus Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. & Others High Court of Delhi
30-01-2020 Pramod Poddar Versus Birla Sun Life Insurance Company Limited & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
30-01-2020 Bristol-Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland Unlimited Company & Others Versus BDR Pharmaceuticals International Pvt. Ltd. & Another High Court of Delhi
29-01-2020 Chedde Mahesh Versus Birla Sun Life Insurance Co. Ltd & Another Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hyderabad
29-01-2020 Sanjay K Balan & Another Versus The Manager, Customer Services/Correspondence Depdt., SBI, Cards and Payments Services Pvt. Ltd., Haryana Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
28-01-2020 M/s. Daimler Financial Services India Private Ltd., Chennai & Others Versus State of Bihar & Others High Court of Judicature at Patna
28-01-2020 M/s. Daimler Financial Services India Private Ltd., Chennai & Others Versus State of Bihar & Others High Court of Judicature at Patna
28-01-2020 M.S. Marketing Services, Salem, Represented by its Proprietor M. Satya Versus The District Revenue Officer / General Manager The Salem District Co-operative Milk Producers Union Limited Sithanoor, Salem & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
28-01-2020 Premchand Ambadas Hanswar Versus The State of Maharashtra, through the Deputy Director of Health Services, Akola In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
27-01-2020 Hotel Soorya International, Represented by its Partner, S. Arumugam Versus The Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition & Excise, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
24-01-2020 Valliyara Trading & Services (Pvt.) Ltd. & Another Versus M/s. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., Egmore, Chennai & Another High Court of Kerala
24-01-2020 M/s. DTT Financial Services (P) Ltd., Chennai, Represented by its Director, Usha Subramaniam Versus N. Uttam Kumar High Court of Judicature at Madras
23-01-2020 Tata Consultancy Services Limited, Kochi, Represented by Its Asst. General Manager-HR, Boban Varghese Thomas & Others Versus State of Kerala, Represented by Its Secretary, Labour & Welfare Department, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram & Others High Court of Kerala
23-01-2020 P. Ramesh Versus The Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Rep. by its Chairman, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
23-01-2020 Tata Consultancy Services Limited, TCS Centre, Kochi, Represented by Its Asst. General Manager-HR, Boban Varghese Thomas & Others Versus State of Kerala, Represented by Its Secretary, Labour & Welfare Department, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram & Others High Court of Kerala
23-01-2020 Birla Sun Life Insurance Company Limited & Others Versus Sunita Madya Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Bhopal
22-01-2020 M/s. IRCON International Limited, (A Government of India Undertaking), Rep. by its Joint General Manager(South), Bangalore Versus The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Superintending Engineer(H), Villupuram High Court of Judicature at Madras
20-01-2020 Proddatur Cable TV Digi Services Versus Siti Cable Network Limited High Court of Delhi
14-01-2020 Export Import Bank of India & Another Versus Punjab National Bank (International) Ltd. & Another High Court of Judicature at Bombay
14-01-2020 International Car and Motors Ltd. Versus Shyam Sundar Sen & Others West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
14-01-2020 Ircon International Limited Versus Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
13-01-2020 Union of India rep. By its Enforcement Officer Enforcement Directorate Chennai Versus M/s. Raiments & Garments International, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
10-01-2020 M/s. Kotec Automative Services India Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Director, Chung Lee Yoon, Sriperumbudur Versus The Commissioner of Service Tax Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-01-2020 M/s. Prime Gold International Limited, Represented by its Director Achin Aggarwal & Another Versus The Additional Director General, The Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence Coimbatore Zonal Unit, Coimbatore & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-01-2020 Phoenix International Ltd V/S Commissioner of Central Excise, Noida-I Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal Regional Bench Allahabad
04-01-2020 HDFC Bank Limited V/S KPG International Private Limited and Others. Debts Recovery Tribunal Delhi
02-01-2020 Oil India Limited, Assam Versus Asian Oil Field Services Limited & Another High Court of Gauhati
20-12-2019 Manjeet Kapoor Proprietor M/s. Manjeet Plastic Industries, New Delhi Versus Tamil Nadu Textbook and Educational Services Corp. Chennai, Tamil Nadu High Court of Judicature at Madras
20-12-2019 Indo Arab Air Services Versus ICICI Home Finance Co. Ltd. Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission New Delhi
19-12-2019 J. John Winfred Versus International Airport Authority of India Rep. By Airport Director, Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-12-2019 Value Advisory Services Versus M/s. ZTE Corporation High Court of Delhi
12-12-2019 Moets Catering Services Through Its Sole Proprietor Mr. Sandeep Bindra Versus Dr. Ambedkar International Center & Others High Court of Delhi
12-12-2019 M/s. Saravana International, Rep. by its Proprietor C.R. Devanathan, Panruti Versus The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Panruti High Court of Judicature at Madras
11-12-2019 P. Natarajan Versus The Joint Director of Medical & Rural Health Services, Tiruppur & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-12-2019 The General Manager, Indian Institute of Emergency Medical Services, Noya Plaza, Kalathippadi, Kottayam Versus Anees Benny, Vaniyakizhakkel veedu, Thodupuzha Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
06-12-2019 M/s. N.V. International Versus State of Assam & Others Supreme Court of India
06-12-2019 Tuli International Through it is Partner, Neeraj Tuli Versus New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Through Sh. A.K. Longai, Manager, Duly Contituted Attorney & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
04-12-2019 M/s. Shriram Distribution Services Pvt. Ltd. Versus M/s. A.N. Traders Pvt. Ltd. High Court of Delhi
03-12-2019 Starlight Real Estate (Ascot) Mauritius Limited & Another Versus Jagrati Trade Services Private Limited & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta


LawyerServices is a Premium Legal Tech solution.


Lawyers, Law Firms, Government Departments and Corporates rely on us for, Workflow Automation, Data Aggregation, Timely Updates, Case Management, Intelligent Research, Latest Legal Data Updates and a LOT more!

If you are a legal professional, CONTACT US, in order to see how our UNIQUE solution can benefit your organization.

Features Intro Close Box