w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Bipinchandra Jayantilal Pandya (Deceased) Through Lrs. v/s Max New York Life Ins. Co. Ltd.


Company & Directors' Information:- MAX INDIA LIMITED [Active] CIN = L85100PB2015PLC039155

Company & Directors' Information:- MAX INDIA LIMITED [Active] CIN = U85100PB2015PLC039155

Company & Directors' Information:- MAX CORPORATION LIMITED [Amalgamated] CIN = U24231PB1996PLC018766

Company & Directors' Information:- MAX INDIA LTD [Amalgamated] CIN = U24232PB1982PLC004841

Company & Directors' Information:- YORK INDIA LTD. [Not available for efiling] CIN = U99999DL1901PLC003613

Company & Directors' Information:- P G MAX PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U22219KL2012PTC031856

Company & Directors' Information:- MAX I. LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999PB2016PLC045450

Company & Directors' Information:- M PANDYA AND COMPANY LIMITED [Dissolved] CIN = U99999MH1945PTC004702

    Civil Revision Application No. 54 of 2012

    Decided On, 07 January 2013

    At, Gujarat State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Ahmedabad

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.P. DHOLAKIA
    By, PRESIDENT
    By, THE HONOURABLE MRS. JYOTI P. JANI
    By, MEMBER & THE HONOURABLE MR. K.K. THAKKER
    By, MEMBER

   



Judgment Text

R.P. Dholakia, President

1. This is an application for review of the order dated 30.11.2012 rendered by this Commission in Appeal No. 626 of 2011.

2.Heard Mr. P.Y. Joshi, learned Advocate for the applicant. When the matter came up for admission hearing, Mr. Joshi has submitted an application and prayed that the application may be treated as Civil Misc. Application. Be that as it may, what the applicant wants is to review the order passed by this Commission in above appeal. This Commission has no power to review its own order. Hence, the application is required to be rejected. Rejected accordi

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

ngly at the stage of admission. Application rejected.
O R