w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Bhati Devi v/s U.O.I. and Others


Company & Directors' Information:- DEVI CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U16000AP2011PTC076133

    Cms 4154, 4441, 4442, 4443-48, 4808/90 & C.W.P. No. 2760/90

    Decided On, 05 November 1990

    At, High Court of Delhi

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.K. CHAWLA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR

    For the Appearing Parties : P.N. Lekhi, Rajiv Dutta, Rajiv Nayyar, Harish Salve, Indu Malhotra, Advocates.



Judgment Text

M.K. CHAWLA, J.


The petitioner is engaged in the trade and business activity of importing and dealing in spices. She has filed the present petition praying for the grant of the following relief's:


"(a) issue a writ of mandamus and/or writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus and subordinates to issue Import licences for the import of cloves cassia/cinnamon on the pending applications before them only on the basis of the current import policy in force ;


(b) issue a writ of mandamus and/or writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus and direct the respondents, their servants, agents, subordinates to first process the applications which arc pending for the licensing years 1988-89 in accordance with the current Import policy in force and after the expiry of the utilisation period of the same the applications pending for the licensing years 1989-90 be also processed in accordance with the current import policy in force ;


(c) issue a writ of mandamus and/or a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus and direct the respondents, their servants, agents, subordinates not to issue or process the applications invited for the licensing period 1990-91 till the expiry of the utilisation period of the licensing period 1989-90;


(d) issue a writ of mandamus and/or a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus and direct the respondents, their servants, agents, subordinates, in the alternative without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner, not to issue any further licences for the import of cloves and cassia/cinnamon uptill the present imported stock available in the country is sufficient for meeting the requirement of the country ; and


(e) any other writ, order or direction which may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present cases."


2. Along with the writ petition, she also moved an application for the grant of certain ad interim Orders on the same terms. At the time of the issuance of the show cause notice to the respondents, the Division Bench of this court, on 28th of August, 1990 passed the following order on the stay application:


"In the meantime, pending applications for grant of licences for import of cloves and cassia/cinnamon shall be processed in accordance with the policy at present in force. We, however, made it clear that pending applications in this case means, the applications which are made under the new policy i.e. April 1990-March, 1993."


3. Subsequently, the petitioner moved a fresh application (CM 4354/90), on which the following order was passed on 5th Sept., 1990:


"In the meantime, the respondents are restrained from issuing any licences under the old policy in respect of cloves and cassia, for the licencing years 1988-89. Dasti."


4. On 18th Sept., 1990, the order dated 28th August, 1990, was modified in these terms:


"After hearing the parties, we are of the opinion that the interim order passed on 28.8.90 in CM 4154/90 should be modified by deleting the last sentence of that order, namely, "We, however, made it clear that the pending applications in this case means the applications which are made under the new policy ; i.e. April 1990-March 1993. Ordered accordingly.


The interim order, as modified today will continue till the disposal of the writ petition. We, however, make it clear that pending applications would mean all applications which are pending and include all applications made under the old as well as new policies and which have not yet been disposed of."


4. The petition moved another application, (CM 457190), for clarification of the order dated 5.9.90. On the said application, the following order was passed on 20.9.90:


"This application has been moved by the petitioner for clarification of the order dated 5.9.90 to the effect that it is still continuing. We have not modified or veried the order dated 5.9.90 and in our view, it is in force. We, however, made it clear that ail pending applications will be processed in accordance with our order dated 28.8.90 as modified by our order dated 18.9.90 as soon as possible without any delay: CM stands disposed of."


5. In spite of these orders, and the clarification, made thereon, on different dates, the grievance of the petitioner is that respondents no. 2 and 3 have now issued a public notice on 1210/90, purportedly declaring its import policy under para 167 AM 1990-93. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that they have no grievance and/or cannot challenge the said policy declared by the government under this para of the import policy which has earlier been kept in abeyance, but since the respondents 1 to 3 are intending to grant licences under this public notice on the applications made for the licencing year 1989-90, the public notice is liable to be misinterpreted and/or abused and or can cause mischief, because during the licencing year 1989.1990, on applications have been called for by the respondents as no policy for issue of any licence had been announced for that licencing year. The further submission is that the respondents 1 to 3 should clarify that this public notice is the announcement of the import policy under para 167AM 1990-93 and licences under this public notice will be issued for licencing year 1990-91 only.


6. The stand of the respondents as disclosed in their counter-affidavit of Shri B.N. Bannerjee. Dy. Chief Controller of Imports and Exports, Govt. of India, in brief is:-


"That they are considering to grant the licences on the pending applications which are received during the year 1989-90, but this proposal is still under consideration. The master according to the learned counsel, has been referred to Ministry of Law for interpretation of this court's order. The matter has also been referred to the Ministry of Finance. And the final decision will be taken keeping in view all the relevant aspects including giving another opportunity to those persons who could not apply during 1989-90 to submit their applications which will be treated at par with the par pending application."


7. In view of this stand of the respondents, the apprehension of the petitioner that the respondents are intending to grant licences under the public notice dated 12.10.90 on the applications made for the licencing year 1989-90 are misplaced, as the matter of the grant of licences to the bona fide applicants is still under consideration of the Government.


8. It is not the case of the petitioner that the respondents have granted import licences to any person under the new policy so far. Therefore, at this stage, the petitioner cannot have any grievance. By the various orders passed by this court, referred to above, this court has already directed the respondents to dispose of the pending applications as per the new policy, and we hope those will be disposed of expenditiously according to law.


9. At this stage, we may note that on a more or less similar grounds M/s Suresh Chand and Co having the same business address as that of the petitioner in the present writ petition, almost claiming the same relief filed a writ, (C.W. 240190). Another Bench of this Court disposed of the said writ petition with the following observations:


"Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he does not wish to press prayers (a) and (b) made in the writ petition and confines his arguments only to prayer (c).The only prayer of the petitioner now is that a direction be issued to the Government not to issue an, further licences for the import of cloves and cassia uptill the present imported stock available in the country is sufficient for meeting the requirement of the country. In

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

our view this is a question of policy to be decided by the Government. We cannot grant any such relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Moreover, the petitioner cannot make any grievance at this stage because there is nothing placed on record by the petitioner showing that any licence has been granted by the Government contrary to the policy. The petitioner is making a grievance only in anticipation of grant of licence on the basis of some apprehension. We, therefore, see no ground to interfere. Dismissed." 10. We see no reasons to differ with the view taken by the said Bench in the case of M/s. Suresh Chand and Co. To us, the present writ petition appears to be pre-mature. The same is dismissed with no orders as to costs. 11. In view of the above order, no orders on these applications are called for. The same also are dismissed.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

30-06-2020 National Seeds Corporation Ltd. Jaipur & Others Versus Manju Devi National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
24-06-2020 Bhagwati Devi Versus Suritram (Dead) & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
18-06-2020 Dr. Manoj Kr. Bhagat Versus Masomat Kanchan Devi National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
17-06-2020 Most. Dhanwanti Devi & Others Versus Sanjharo Devi & Others High Court of Judicature at Patna
15-06-2020 Samri Devi Shaw Versus New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
15-06-2020 New India Assurance Company Ltd. Through Its Duly Constituted Attorney Manager, New Delhi Versus Aasha Devi & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
12-06-2020 Munni Devi & Others Versus State of U.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
11-06-2020 Sheelender Kumar Gupta & Another Versus Mahaviri Devi (Deceased) Thr. Lrs. High Court of Delhi
08-06-2020 Geeta Devi Versus Om Prakash & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
02-06-2020 Renu Devi & Another Versus State of Punjab & Others High Court of Punjab and Haryana
28-05-2020 Most. Ahilya Devi @ Ahilya Devi Versus State of Bihar & Others High Court of Judicature at Patna
28-05-2020 Manju Devi Versus Board of Revenue Allahabad & Others High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
21-05-2020 Savitri Devi & Others Versus State of U.P. & Others High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
20-05-2020 Aasha Devi Versus Bihar State Food & Civil Supply Corporation Ltd through its Managing Director, Patna & Others High Court of Judicature at Patna
04-05-2020 Priyambada Devi Birla & Birla Corporation Ltd. Versus Arvind Kumar Newar & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
01-05-2020 Inder Singh Versus Savitri Devi High Court of Delhi
29-04-2020 Gopi Chand Versus Geeta Devi & Others High Court of Delhi
15-04-2020 Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Ltd. & Others Versus Mohani Devi & Another Supreme Court of India
23-03-2020 Damyanti Devi Versus Vipul Infrastructure Developers Ltd. & Others High Court of Delhi
20-03-2020 Prem Devi Versus Delhi Development Authority Through Its Vice Chairman Vikas Sadan, New Delhi National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
19-03-2020 Uma Devi Versus The State Govt of NCT of Delhi High Court of Delhi
19-03-2020 Satya Devi Versus State of HP & Another High Court of Himachal Pradesh
18-03-2020 Surendra Kumar Versus Phulwanti Devi High Court of Rajasthan
18-03-2020 Dr. Nirmala Devi, Obstetrician & Gynecologist, Assitant Professor Versus Chandrakanta National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
16-03-2020 Khushboo Devi Versus Indranil Ray Chowdhury & Others West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
10-03-2020 G. Uma Devi & Another Versus M. Krishnamurthy Reddiar & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
09-03-2020 The Branch Manager, M/s The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Through Divisional Manager Versus Jayanti Devi & Others High Court of Jharkhand
06-03-2020 M/s Nandan Biomatrix Ltd. Versus S. Ambika Devi & Others Supreme Court of India
06-03-2020 Sakuntala Devi Versus Dr. Md. Mumtaz Alam & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
06-03-2020 M. Vanaja Versus M. Sarla Devi (Dead) Supreme Court of India
06-03-2020 Poonam Devi & Others Versus Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Supreme Court of India
04-03-2020 Tulsa Devi Nirola & Others Versus Radha Nirola & Others Supreme Court of India
04-03-2020 Ambika Singh (since deceased) represented by legal representatives & Others Versus Mosomat Sohagi Devi (since deceased) represented by her legal heirs & Others High Court of Judicature at Patna
03-03-2020 Saraswati Devi Versus Bharat Coking Coal Limited through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Dhanbad & Others High Court of Jharkhand
28-02-2020 Sandhya Devi @ Sandhya Goyal Versus State High Court of Delhi
28-02-2020 Devi & Another Versus The Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition & Excise Department, Secretariat & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-02-2020 Tvl. Trust Metal, Rep. by its Proprietrix Bhagwanti Devi Versus Assistant Commissioner (CT), Moore Market (South) Assessment Circle High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-02-2020 M/s. Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd., Chennai Versus Karmi Devi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
26-02-2020 Devi Versus Narayanan @ Alagappan & Another Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
25-02-2020 Shyam Sundar Dhal Versus Sharada Devi Bubna & Others West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
18-02-2020 Golkonda Uma Devi Versus Enti Manjula & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
18-02-2020 ITC Limited, Chennai, Rep. by its Constituted Attorney, V.M. Rajasekharan Versus Shree Devi Match Industries, Gudiyattam & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
18-02-2020 Sujatha Devi Akondi & Others Versus M/s. Safeway InfraRep By Its Managing Partner Ivsn Raju, Hyderabad & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
13-02-2020 Mala Devi Versus State of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Medical & Health Lko. & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
11-02-2020 Ratna Devi Versus State of Haryana & Others High Court of Punjab and Haryana
06-02-2020 Manju Devi Versus State of Bihar High Court of Judicature at Patna
04-02-2020 Kiran Devi Agrawal & Others Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
03-02-2020 A. Sakunthala Devi Versus The Registrar General, High Court, Madras & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
30-01-2020 Vidya Devi & Another Versus The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, To the Government of India, Ministry of Defence, New Delhi & Another Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
30-01-2020 Urmila Devi & Others Versus Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd. & Another Supreme Court of India
28-01-2020 Shakuntala Devi Jan Kalyan Samiti Through Secy. & Others Versus State of U.P. Through Prin.Secy. Home Lucknow & Others High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
28-01-2020 Kirpal Singh & Others Versus Kamla Devi & Others Supreme Court of India
28-01-2020 Kashmira Devi Versus State of Uttarakhand & Others Supreme Court of India
24-01-2020 Manokamini Devi Versus Ashok Kumar High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
23-01-2020 C. Sarojini Devi Versus The Director of Local Fund Audits, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
22-01-2020 K.S. Rema Devi, Accountant, Azhoor-Muttappalam Service Co-Operative Bank, Thiruvananthapuram Versus The Kerala Co-Operative Service Examination Board, Represented by Its Secretary, Thiruvannathapuram & Others High Court of Kerala
20-01-2020 Sumitra Devi (Female) Versus State of Bihar & Others High Court of Judicature at Patna
20-01-2020 State of AP Versus Devi Engineering & Construction High Court of Andhra Pradesh
17-01-2020 Neelam Devi Versus State of Bihar Through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna High Court of Judicature at Patna
17-01-2020 Shunti Devi Versus State of Jharkhand High Court of Jharkhand
16-01-2020 Guriya Devi Versus State of Bihar Through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna High Court of Judicature at Patna
14-01-2020 Bajaj Allianz General Ins. Co. Ltd. Versus Satya Devi & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
10-01-2020 In Goods of Late Sandhaya Devi Versus ----------- High Court of Judicature at Patna
09-01-2020 Deedar Devi Versus Jhabarmal Sheshma High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
08-01-2020 Vidya Devi Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh & Others Supreme Court of India
08-01-2020 J. Nirmala Devi & Others Versus The Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Vijayawada-Dharmapuri Pipeline project, Rep., by its General Manager, Mumbai & Others High Court of Andhra Pradesh
07-01-2020 Usha Devi Versus Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. & Others High Court of Himachal Pradesh
07-01-2020 Rajesh Sakuja Versus Asha Devi Chouhan & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
07-01-2020 J.S. Sharma & Sons Versus Shiv Devi Meena High Court of Delhi
06-01-2020 Union of India & Others Versus Munni Devi & Others High Court of Delhi
06-01-2020 The State of Tripura, represented by the Secretary (Revenue), Government of Tripura, Agartala & Others VersusBibhu Kumari Devi & Others High Court of Tripura
06-01-2020 Union of India & Others Versus Munni Devi & Others High Court of Delhi
03-01-2020 Shyamala Devi Versus The Regional Manager, Regional Office, State Bank of India, Region – IV, Coimbatore & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
03-01-2020 B.K. Usha Devi & Others V/S Punjab National Bank by its General Manager Head Office, New Delhi & Others High Court of Karnataka
03-01-2020 Nandini Devi Versus District Registrar, Coimbatore & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
26-12-2019 Sheela Devi Versus State of H.P. & Others High Court of Himachal Pradesh
20-12-2019 Milap Devi Jain & Others Versus Bank of Baroda & Others Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Allahabad
20-12-2019 Anjali Devi & Others Versus Govindu & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
18-12-2019 Jatinder Singh Versus Suman Devi High Court of Punjab and Haryana
16-12-2019 New India Assurance Company Limited Versus Narmada Devi & Others High Court of Jharkhand
16-12-2019 Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus Srimati Devi & Others High Court of Jharkhand
16-12-2019 Urmila Devi & Others Versus Superintendent of Police & Others High Court of Jharkhand
12-12-2019 Kalan Devi Versus Munshi Ram High Court of Himachal Pradesh
11-12-2019 Arti Devi Versus Jawaharlal Nehru University High Court of Delhi
11-12-2019 Puspalata Devi Versus Union of India, Represented by the General Manager (P), Maligaon, Guwahati & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
09-12-2019 Pushpa Devi Versus Hanuman Ram High Court of Rajasthan
09-12-2019 Surya Prakash & Another Versus Renuka Devi & Another High Court of Karnataka
05-12-2019 Laxmi Devi Versus Suresh Mendiratta High Court of Delhi
04-12-2019 Union of India & Others Versus Navindra Devi Supreme Court of India
03-12-2019 Krishna Devi & Others Versus State of Haryana & Others High Court of Punjab and Haryana
27-11-2019 ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited Versus Sunita Devi Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Panchkula
21-11-2019 B. Booma Devi & Others Versus The District Collector, Kancheepuram District & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
20-11-2019 A. Ashraf Ali & Others Versus B.S. Susheela Devi & Others High Court of Karnataka
20-11-2019 Ram Avtar Bairwa Versus Sunita Devi @ Santra High Court of Delhi
19-11-2019 Bhagwan Das Bhajanka (Deceased) Through His Lrs. Versus Bimala Devi Goyal Supreme Court of India
15-11-2019 Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd Versus Parul Devi & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
14-11-2019 M/s. Sri Devi Karumariamman Educational Trust, Represented by its Trustee J. Kumaran, Chennai Versus Indian bank, Represented by its Assistant General Manager, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
14-11-2019 Sahara India & Another Versus Basmati Devi & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
13-11-2019 Chandrawati Devi & Another Versus Sharda Gupta & Others High Court of Sikkim
07-11-2019 Thounaojam (N) Huidrom (o) Shantibala Devi Versus Huidrom Dwijendra Singh High Court of Manipur


LawyerServices is a Premium Legal Tech solution.


Lawyers, Law Firms, Government Departments and Corporates rely on us for, Workflow Automation, Data Aggregation, Timely Updates, Case Management, Intelligent Research, Latest Legal Data Updates and a LOT more!

If you are a legal professional, CONTACT US, in order to see how our UNIQUE solution can benefit your organization.

Features Intro Close Box