w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Beyond Malls LLP v/s Lifestyle Internationsl Private Limited & Another


Company & Directors' Information:- S V CORPORATION LLP [Active] CIN = AAQ-7877

Company & Directors' Information:- D B MALLS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45203MP2006PTC018699

Company & Directors' Information:- M B MALLS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1980PTC010175

Company & Directors' Information:- B L K LIFESTYLE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U20299DL2000PLC106779

Company & Directors' Information:- BEYOND CORPORATION (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U70102PN2008PTC133272

Company & Directors' Information:- G. S. MALLS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999JK2008PTC002914

Company & Directors' Information:- A P T AND CO LLP [] CIN = AAL-8025

Company & Directors' Information:- R D N A AND CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAM-4183

Company & Directors' Information:- A TO Z LIFESTYLE (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U52190MH2011PTC212931

Company & Directors' Information:- C A P A (INDIA) LLP [] CIN = AAF-9325

Company & Directors' Information:- K T LIFESTYLE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51900MH2009PTC213939

Company & Directors' Information:- S K LIFESTYLE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U52100TG2012PTC080741

Company & Directors' Information:- C D LIFESTYLE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909DL2007PTC169941

Company & Directors' Information:- LIFESTYLE INDIA LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U55101DL1998PLC092232

Company & Directors' Information:- M D S & CO LLP [] CIN = AAF-2760

Company & Directors' Information:- A A A M & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAT-1669

Company & Directors' Information:- R C A AND CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAU-3441

Company & Directors' Information:- D B Y & CO LLP [] CIN = AAF-3364

Company & Directors' Information:- C A N V A S & CO LLP [] CIN = AAG-1661

Company & Directors' Information:- E I U INDIA LLP [] CIN = AAG-0189

Company & Directors' Information:- S S S R & COMPANY LLP [Active] CIN = AAS-6238

Company & Directors' Information:- M B S P & CO LLP [] CIN = AAI-4025

Company & Directors' Information:- Y N G AND CO LLP [] CIN = AAJ-6096

Company & Directors' Information:- ECOIRIA LLP [Active] CIN = AAO-2501

Company & Directors' Information:- V S K A & COMPANY LLP [Active] CIN = AAU-5542

Company & Directors' Information:- F A M S & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAU-9603

Company & Directors' Information:- N K R G AND CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAX-4256

Company & Directors' Information:- H N C P & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAT-5981

Company & Directors' Information:- V G R A N D & CO LLP [Under Process Of Strike Off] CIN = AAO-5777

Company & Directors' Information:- B & C MALLS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45201UP2007PTC033085

Company & Directors' Information:- R S A C & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAX-1702

Company & Directors' Information:- A B D AND CO LLP [] CIN = AAG-4228

Company & Directors' Information:- D G K T & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAY-0763

Company & Directors' Information:- R H D B & CO LLP [] CIN = AAF-9564

Company & Directors' Information:- N J S R & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAS-6904

Company & Directors' Information:- M S T S AND CO LLP [] CIN = AAJ-9789

Company & Directors' Information:- A G N & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAT-3343

Company & Directors' Information:- A H S G & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAU-8429

Company & Directors' Information:- J K J S & CO. LLP [] CIN = AAI-5880

Company & Directors' Information:- A B A M & CO. LLP [] CIN = AAF-2113

Company & Directors' Information:- M N S H & CO LLP [] CIN = AAG-4390

Company & Directors' Information:- T & R INDIA LLP [] CIN = AAH-4079

Company & Directors' Information:- S G S R & CO LLP [] CIN = AAH-3391

Company & Directors' Information:- D M M & COMPANY LLP [] CIN = AAJ-7431

Company & Directors' Information:- Y S K AND CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAN-5713

Company & Directors' Information:- J K K & COMPANY LLP [Active] CIN = AAX-1522

Company & Directors' Information:- K L S AND CO LLP [] CIN = AAJ-7210

Company & Directors' Information:- A Y K J & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAS-7373

Company & Directors' Information:- K N A AND CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAU-0083

Company & Directors' Information:- H S K & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAT-9072

Company & Directors' Information:- S D U AND CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAM-9609

Company & Directors' Information:- P AND G LIFESTYLE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U17120MH2009PTC194976

Company & Directors' Information:- E AND E E-MALLS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74120MH2014PTC257291

Company & Directors' Information:- H R LIFESTYLE PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U36101TG2013PTC090148

Company & Directors' Information:- W-LIFESTYLE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U29300DL2012PTC238204

Company & Directors' Information:- J N J LIFESTYLE PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U18109GJ2015PTC082427

Company & Directors' Information:- A P A R & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAS-8336

Company & Directors' Information:- A A M K & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAT-0385

Company & Directors' Information:- V U D & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAT-1391

Company & Directors' Information:- A K M W AND CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAF-4352

Company & Directors' Information:- D V LIFESTYLE LLP [] CIN = AAE-7167

Company & Directors' Information:- M B D & CO LLP [] CIN = AAG-6725

Company & Directors' Information:- S R J N & CO LLP [] CIN = AAH-0969

Company & Directors' Information:- A T M S & CO LLP [] CIN = AAH-2210

Company & Directors' Information:- J J J AND COMPANY LLP [] CIN = AAH-6513

Company & Directors' Information:- R AND G LIFESTYLE LLP [] CIN = AAH-6334

Company & Directors' Information:- B G K & CO LLP [] CIN = AAI-2849

Company & Directors' Information:- M N K D & CO LLP [] CIN = AAI-9526

Company & Directors' Information:- D S R V AND CO LLP [] CIN = AAJ-5358

Company & Directors' Information:- K D M AND CO LLP [] CIN = AAJ-9144

Company & Directors' Information:- S P K G & CO LLP [] CIN = AAK-1705

Company & Directors' Information:- V D S R & CO LLP [] CIN = AAK-2237

Company & Directors' Information:- BEYOND MALLS LLP [] CIN = AAK-4372

Company & Directors' Information:- M A S P N & CO LLP [] CIN = AAK-4575

Company & Directors' Information:- N P K & COMPANY LLP [] CIN = AAL-7453

Company & Directors' Information:- V & P LIFESTYLE LLP [Active] CIN = AAM-0749

Company & Directors' Information:- J B S K & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAN-2033

Company & Directors' Information:- D R P B AND CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAN-7871

Company & Directors' Information:- PALVIT DEVELOPERS LLP [Active] CIN = AAO-3310

Company & Directors' Information:- N G V R AND COMPANY LLP [Active] CIN = AAO-4093

Company & Directors' Information:- J A S N & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAP-0336

Company & Directors' Information:- R S A G AND CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAP-1444

Company & Directors' Information:- K J LIFESTYLE LLP [Active] CIN = AAT-3656

Company & Directors' Information:- P R P A & COMPANY LLP [Active] CIN = AAT-7868

Company & Directors' Information:- S M B C & COMPANY LLP [Active] CIN = AAU-0557

Company & Directors' Information:- L M R K & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAV-4030

Company & Directors' Information:- S L B M AND CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAV-4289

Company & Directors' Information:- V K & COMPANY LLP [Active] CIN = AAW-7564

Company & Directors' Information:- D A M & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAW-8134

Company & Directors' Information:- N A D & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAW-9504

Company & Directors' Information:- A B R & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAX-0331

Company & Directors' Information:- V H P A & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAY-1712

Company & Directors' Information:- N C A P & COMPANY LLP [Active] CIN = AAY-2026

Company & Directors' Information:- B M P S & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAW-9364

Company & Directors' Information:- J K J & CO LLP [] CIN = AAE-5439

Company & Directors' Information:- S G C O & CO LLP [] CIN = AAI-0379

Company & Directors' Information:- G P S & CO LLP [] CIN = AAI-0872

Company & Directors' Information:- K K A B & CO LLP [] CIN = AAJ-3296

Company & Directors' Information:- C S D AND CO LLP [] CIN = AAJ-4629

Company & Directors' Information:- M P G V & CO LLP [] CIN = AAJ-5351

Company & Directors' Information:- A T S G & CO LLP [] CIN = AAK-3751

Company & Directors' Information:- H & T LIFESTYLE LLP [] CIN = AAL-7811

Company & Directors' Information:- G G S H & CO. LLP [] CIN = AAL-8083

Company & Directors' Information:- J N S V & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAM-6900

Company & Directors' Information:- S P K T & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAN-7572

Company & Directors' Information:- S H A & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAO-4028

Company & Directors' Information:- R S S P K & CO LLP [Under Process Of Strike Off] CIN = AAR-2109

Company & Directors' Information:- A A S S & COMPANY LLP [Active] CIN = AAT-4426

Company & Directors' Information:- R R S J & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAV-8062

Company & Directors' Information:- A R B R & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAX-6334

Company & Directors' Information:- AND BEYOND LLP [Active] CIN = AAY-6393

Company & Directors' Information:- S K B & COMPANY LLP [Active] CIN = AAT-5051

Company & Directors' Information:- P R S S & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAW-2115

Company & Directors' Information:- G A S A & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAU-4365

Company & Directors' Information:- S P A S AND CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAS-9005

Company & Directors' Information:- S K R AND COMPANY LLP [Active] CIN = AAB-9330

Company & Directors' Information:- C S AND CO LLP [] CIN = AAL-5204

Company & Directors' Information:- M M G S AND CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAW-8857

Company & Directors' Information:- A J M S & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAS-6794

Company & Directors' Information:- S B S S & CO LLP [] CIN = AAG-2178

Company & Directors' Information:- P Y S & CO LLP [] CIN = AAG-9715

Company & Directors' Information:- P U M & CO LLP [Under Process Of Strike Off] CIN = AAP-1869

Company & Directors' Information:- P V R A & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAP-2457

Company & Directors' Information:- K S N C & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAQ-8095

Company & Directors' Information:- A R N P AND CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAS-7063

Company & Directors' Information:- N M G K & COMPANY LLP [Active] CIN = AAU-2181

Company & Directors' Information:- S H A P AND COMPANY LLP [Active] CIN = AAU-5309

Company & Directors' Information:- B K Y & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAU-7172

Company & Directors' Information:- B R D P & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAV-4924

Company & Directors' Information:- S R B A & CO LLP [] CIN = AAF-9001

Company & Directors' Information:- C S M & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAW-1462

Company & Directors' Information:- A C C A & CO LLP [] CIN = AAF-2112

Company & Directors' Information:- K A M AND CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAU-7380

Company & Directors' Information:- S C M K & CO LLP [Active] CIN = AAT-2422

    Case No. M.P. No. 2861 of 2020

    Decided On, 04 November 2020

    At, High Court of Madhya Pradesh

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHRIVASTAVA

    For the Petitioner: Priyankush Jain, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, Deepesh Joshi, Advocate, R2, None.



Judgment Text

Sujoy Paul, J.1. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India takes exception to the order dated 11.09.2020 whereby application filed by present petitioner/ non-applicant No.2 under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of CPC was dismissed by the court below.2. Draped in brevity, the relevant facts for adjudication of this matter are that respondent No.1 filed an application under section 9 of the Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act) before the court below. Since petitioner/ non-applicant No.2 was impleaded as a party, he preferred an application under Order 1 rule 10(2) CPC for deletion of his name. The bone of contention before the court below was that section 9 proceedings are founded upon an agreement and petitioner/ non-applicant No.2 was not a party to the said agreement. The court below after hearing the parties, passed a detailed order dated 11.09.2020 and rejected the aforesaid application filed under Order 1 rule 10(2) of CPC.3. Shri Priyankush Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that initially a lease agreement dated 21.02.2012 (Annx.M/1) was entered into between the parties. This was followed by yet another agreement between petitioner and respondent No.2 entered in the year 2017. Section 9 proceedings are arising out of this agreement of 2017 in which admittedly present petitioner was not a privy. Hence, section 9 proceedings are not maintainable. The court below has committed error of law in disallowing the application preferred under Order 1 rule 10(2) of CPC.By placing reliance on (2011) 1 SCC 320 (S.N.Prasad, Hitek Industries (Bihar) Ltd. Vs. Monnet Finance Limited and others), Shri Jain urged that the applicant could have impleaded the present petitioner/ non-applicant No.2 only when he was a party to the agreement. Reliance is placed on the definition of "party" defined under Section 2(h) and definition of "agreement" defined under section 7 of the Arbitration Act. To bolster the aforesaid submission, reliance is placed on AIR 2006 Delhi-134 (National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) Vs. M/s China Coal Construction Group Corpn.) wherein it was held that a party who was not signatory to arbitration agreement cannot be sued. Since intervenor before the Delhi Court was not privy to contract, he was not permitted to participate in the proceedings filed under section 9 of the Arbitration Act. Lastly, he placed reliance on 2007(3) MPHT 206 (DB) (M/s B.D.Bhanot and Sons Vs. Shri Narmada Enterprises and others) for drawing analogy that a person who was not a party in arbitration proceedings before the court below was precluded to file an appeal under section 37 before the court below. It is urged that court below has erred in disallowing the said application.4. Sounding a contra note, Shri Deepesh Joshi submits that as per section 8 of the The Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 (Commercial Courts Act), the intention of law makers is clear that at interlocutory stage and against interlocutory orders, no revision etc. is maintainable. Although, said statutory provision may not curtail or deprive the constitutional courts to exercise the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226/227 of the Constitution, the fact remains that intention of law makers was to ensure minimal interference at interlocutory stage. Clause-M of the agreement dated 27.09.2017 (Annx.M-3) makes it clear that the lessee (present petitioner) shall honour all the lease agreement/ lease Deeds signed by the lessor previously with various retailers until such time any breach of agreement/ Deed is committed by those retailers. He submits that the court below has taken note of the relevant clauses of agreement dated 27.9.2017 and rightly came to hold that in view of judgment of Supreme Court in Ambica Prasad Vs. Mohd. Alam and another (2015)13 SCC-13, it is well settled that transferee of landlord's rights steps into the shoes of landlord's with all rights and liabilities of the transferor landlord in respect of the subsisting. He also supported the order of court below on the basis of judgment of Bombay High Court reported in (2009) 2 BCR-247 (Narayan Manik Patil Vs. Jayawant Patil). Shri Deepesh Joshi has taken pains to take us to clause-(e) of the application preferred under Section 9 of the Act (Annx.M-5). He submits that for the purpose of adjudication of applicant's rights in relation to aforesaid clause, the present petitioner is certainly a necessary party.5. During the course of argument reliance is also placed by Shri Joshi on AIR 1975 Calcutta page-8 (M/s Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd. Vs. M/s Bharat Spun Pipe Co., (2013) 1 SCC-641 (Chloro Controls India Private Ltd. Vs. Severn Trent Water Purification Inc. and Others and (2018) 16 SCC-413 (Cheran Properties Ltd. Vs. Kasturi and Sons Limited and others. It is contended that the law relating to arbitration is clear and it can very well bind the non-applicant No.2/ petitioner when applicant is in a position to demonstrate that his rights are going to be affected and provisions of section 109 of Transfer of Property Act,1882 are attracted. Lastly, (2005) 6 SCC 733 (Kasturi Vs. Iyyamperumal and Others) is relied upon to submit that as per dicta of this judgment, relief can be claimed against a party and if it is shown that relief is related to that party, the said party becomes a "necessary party".6. No other point is pressed by learned counsel for the parties.7. We have heard the parties at length and perused the record.8. At the outset, we may record that Section 8 of the Commercial Courts Act cannot be read to mean that supervisory jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution is taken away in any manner. A Constitution Bench of Supreme Court in L.Chandra Kumar Vs. Union of India has taken this view. The same view is taken by the Apex Court in Shalini Shyam Shetty and another Vs. Rajendra Shankar Patil- (2010) 8 SCC-329.The court below has reproduced the relevant clauses in the impugned order. Clause-M of Annexure M/3 dated 27.09.2017 reads as under :-"Clause-M- The Lessee1 shall honour all the lease agreement/ Lease Deeds signed by the Lessor2 previously with various retailers3 until such time any breach of agreement/ Deeds is committed by those retailers."(1.-Petitioner, 2.- Respondent No.2, 3.-Applicant) (Added by us to clarify the role of parties)9. No doubt in the peculiar facts situation, the Delhi High Court in the case of National Highway Authority of India (supra) opined that in arbitration proceedings impleadment of a party is in relation to subject matter and intervenor having no privity of contract with petitioner therein, prayer for its impleadment is liable to be rejected. A careful reading of this judgment shows that it was delivered keeping in view the relevant clauses of agreement prevailing in that case. As a rule of thumb or straight jacket formula it is not laid down that in no case/ situation a party not signatory to agreement can be impleaded in a proceeding under section 9 of Arbitration Act.10. However, the principle regarding impleadment in arbitration proceedings is no more res integra. It is apt to consider the principle enunciated by Russell in "Russell on Arbitration". Relevant portion reproduced in (2018) 16 SCC 434 (Cheran Properties Ltd Vs. Kasturi and Sons Ltd. reads as under :-"Arbitration is usually limited to parties who have consented to the process, either by agreeing in their contract to refer any disputes arising in the future between them to arbitration or by submitting to arbitration when a dispute arises. A party who has not so consented, often referred to as a third party or a non-signatory to the arbitration agreement, is usually excluded from the arbitration. There are however some occasions when such a third party may be bound by the agreement to arbitrate. For example, …, assignees and representatives may become a party to the arbitration agreement in place of the original signatory on the basis that they are successors to that party’s interest and claim “through or under” the original party. The third party can then be compelled to arbitrate any dispute that arises."(Emphasis Supplied)This principle was followed by the Calcutta High Court in the case of M/s Hindustan Steel Works Construction (supra). The same principle is followed by the Supreme Court in the case of Chloro Controls India Private Ltd. (supra). After reproducing the aforementioned paragraph from the book of Russell, the Apex Court considered this aspect in great detail in the case of Cheran Properties (supra). The relevant paragraphs reads as under :-21. Explaining the legal basis that may be applied to bind a non-signatory to an arbitration agreement, this Court held in Chloro Controls case held thus (SCCp.694, paras 103.1, 103.1, 103.2 & 105)“103.1 The first theory is that of implied consent, third-party beneficiaries, guarantors, assignment and other transfer mechanisms of contractual rights. This theory relies on the discernible intentions of the parties and, to a large extent, on good faith principle. They apply to private as well as public legal entities.103.2 The second theory includes the legal doctrines of agentprincipal relations, apparent authority, piercing of veil (also called “the alter ego”), joint venture relations, succession and estoppel. They do not rely on the parties' intention but rather on the force of the applicable law.105. We have already discussed that under the group of companies doctrine, an arbitration agreement entered into by a company within a group of companies can bind its non-signatory affiliates, if the circumstances demonstrate that the mutual intention of the parties was to bind both the signatory as well as the nonsignatory parties.25. Does the requirement, as in Section 7, that an arbitration agreement be in writing exclude the possibility of binding third parties who may not be signatories to an agreement between two contracting entities? The evolving body of academic literature as well as adjudicatory trends indicate that in certain situations, an arbitration agreement between two or more parties may operate to bind other parties as well. Redfern and Hunter explain the theoretical foundation of this principle:“..The requirement of a signed agreement in writing, however, does not altogether exclude the possibility of an arbitration agreement concluded in proper form between two or more parties also binding other parties. Third parties to an arbitration agreement have been held to be bound by (or entitled to rely on) such an agreement in a variety of ways: first, by operation of the ‘group of companies’ doctrine pursuant to which the benefits and duties arising from an arbitration agreement may in certain circumstances be extended to other members of the same group of companies; and, secondly, by operation of general rules of private law, principally on assignment, agency, and succession..”(Emphasis supplied)11. A plain reading of these paragraphs makes it clear that if as per the agreement it can be shown that the relief can be claimed against a particular party, whether or not he is signatory to the said agreement, he can be treated to be a "necessary party". As noticed above, Clause-M of Annexure M/3 dated 27.09.2017 in no uncertain terms binds the present petitioner being a lessee and respondent No.2 as lessor and retailer. In this backdrop, if relief claimed in the application filed under section 9 of Arbitration Act is perused, it cannot be said that present petitioner is not a "necessary party". In the case of S.N.Prasad (Supra) as per relevant cla

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

uses of agreement, one guarantor was not covered and hence Apex Court ruled against original applicant. In the instant case, clauses of agreement are differently worded and hence said judgment is of no assistance to petitioner. The Bombay High Court in Narayan Prasad (supra) opined that interim measure application can be filed against such third party despite the fact that he is not signatory to the agreement. We respectfully agree with the principle laid down by Bombay High Court.12. In view of relevant clauses of the agreement/ lease deeds (which were reproduced in the order impugned) we are of the opinion that court below has taken a plausible view and has not committed any illegality.13. Interference under Article 227 of the Constitution can be made on limited grounds. If order suffers from any jurisdictional error, palpable procedural impropriety or manifest perversity, interference can be made. Another view is possible, is not a ground for interference. This court is not required to act as a Bull in China Shop or to correct mere errors of law or fact merely because another view than one is taken by the court below, is possible (See : Shalini Shyam Shetty (supra). In absence of any ingredient on which interference can be made, interference is declined. Petition is dismissed.
O R