w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Ashutosh Bansal v/s Birla Institute of Management & Technology & Others


Company & Directors' Information:- BIRLA CORPORATION LIMITED [Active] CIN = L01132WB1919PLC003334

Company & Directors' Information:- BANSAL CORPORATION LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1999PLC102216

Company & Directors' Information:- B. BANSAL AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U24246UP1996PTC020088

Company & Directors' Information:- D TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U01403MH2015PTC268305

Company & Directors' Information:- BANSAL AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74140DL2000PTC108131

Company & Directors' Information:- A S INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U80302DL2005PTC140941

    First Appeal No. 129 of 2019

    Decided On, 18 April 2019

    At, National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

    By, HE HONOURABLE DR. S.M. KANTIKAR
    By, PRESIDING MEMBER & THE HONOURABLE MR. DINESH SINGH
    By, MEMBER

    For the Appellant: In person. For the Respondents: --------



Judgment Text

Dinesh Singh, Member

1. The appellant – complainant in person was heard. The material on record was perused.

2. On 04.04.2019, after hearing arguments of the appellant – complainant in person, and after perusing the material on record, we passed the following Order:

Dated: 04-04-2019

ORDER

Heard the appellant – complainant in person. Perused the material on record.

The first appeal is dismissed with stern advice of caution to the appellant – complainant through imposition of (token) cost of Rs. 500/- to be deposited in the Consumer Legal Aid Account of the State Commission within four weeks of the pronouncement of the reasoned judgment.

The reason judgement to follow.

We are giving our reasons hereinafter.

3. Briefly, the complainant, a research scholar, has alleged deficiency in service against the educational institution and the university (and the others arrayed) for not enabling him to complete his Ph.D.

4. The State Commission had heard both sides, appraised the evidence, and, vide its Order dated 11.10.2018, dismissed the complaint in limine:

12. We have gone through the material on record and heard the counsel for the complainant for the purpose of admission of complaint for hearing. We find that the grievance of the complainant pertains to two aspects, one for leaving the university by guide Dr. Anshul Verma and his joining some other institute in Mumbai. We feel that this is beyond the control of OPs. No university can compel its Professor to continue with it. The other grievance is that he was not given extension to complete the course. With exercise of lot of diligence we came across letter dated 18.11.16 copy of which is at page-43 of the bunch of complaint. The same recites that during the period of six years of his registration as Research Scholar, university did not receive a single complaint in writing or telephonically from the complaint regarding any kind of inconvenience or torturing. The Dean was approached only to seek extension beyond six years which as per the decision of the academy council could not be granted. The Vice Chancellor agreed with the said noting on the bottom of aforesaid letter. Thus we feel that complaint has been filed to pressurise the OP to grant extension against the norms, under the garb of present complaint. Copy of letter at page-45 and 46 support the decision not to grant extension beyond six years.

13. As a result of the above discussion we find that the complaint is false and frivolous. The same has been filed only to extort money. Consumer Protection Act is not meant to be tool to attempt to wrong gains or to create ‘nuisance’ value. In taking this view we are supported by recent decision of National commission in FA No. 847 / 17 titled as Dr. Uttam Kumar Samanta vs. Vodafone Assets Ltd. and others decided on 05.10.18.

14. The complaint is dismissed in limine.

(paras 12, 13 and 14 of the State Commission’s Order)

(emphasis supplied)

5. The instant first appeal has been filed by the complainant against the said Order dated 11.10.2018 of the State Commission.

6. We find the impugned Order of the State Commission to be well-appraised and well-reasoned. We note in particular the extracts of the State Commission’s Order, quoted, verbatim, in para 4 above. On the face of it, we find no jurisdictional error, or a legal principle ignored, or miscarriage of justice.

7. We specifically note that, one, the complainant, a research scholar, did not complete his Ph.D. within a period of six years that was the upper time – limit stipulated by the academic council, and, two, extension beyond six years was denied by the vice-chancellor in the light of the academic council’s said stipulation. The vice-chancellor but implemented a decision of the academic council, which, in the absence of the complainant establishing to the contrary, we have no reason to hypothesize was not applicable uniformly to all similarly placed research scholars. It has nowhere been shown by the complainant that he was in any manner subjectively or selectively or unfairly or wrongly discriminated against. His other contention, that his guide left the institution and joined another, is no ground for holding deficiency in service. An educational institution or university cannot compel a professor to stay put in a particular institution so that a particular research scholar is facilitated to complete his Ph.D.; and other professors would no doubt be available to act as guides.

8. We agree with the State Commission that deficiency in service on the part of the educational institution or the university (or the others arrayed) is not made out.

9. We further note that this is a case of a research scholar who could not finish his research within the upper time - limit (of six years) stipulated by the academic council, and, as borne out by the material on record, who not only made complaints with the police and sent complaints to various authorities, but also approached the consumer protection fora. Apart from alleging deficiency, where none exists, and, ex facie, asking for absurd compensation (Rs.70 lakh for “fees paid, financial losses, precious time of 6 years, damages, compensation, interest, harassment and mental agony”), an inherent objective of the complainant, to harass, as well as to pressurize, the educational institution and the university, is also quite evident. The consumer protection fora are meant for better protection of the interests of consumers, and not to create ‘nuisance value’ in educational institutions or universities or to unduly attempt special treatment apropos uniformly prescribed stipulations of the academic council or to unduly harass and pressurize an educational institution or university to anyhow enable to him to get a Ph.D. A Ph.D. has to be earned with academic effort and diligence, not through the route of (inter alia) consumer protection fora. The first appeal is patently misconceived and devoid of merit.

10. The first appeal is dismissed with stern advice of caution to the appellant – complainant through imposition of (token) cost of Rs.500/- to be deposited in the Consumer Legal Aid Account of the State Commission within four weeks of the pronouncement of this Order.

11. We make it explicit that we

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

have limited ourselves to the ambit of the Act 1986. It goes without saying that the complaints made with the police and the complaints sent by the complainant to various authorities (including regulatory and disciplinary authorities) will be dealt with, on merit, as per the law, by the concerned, at their respective responsibility and accountability. Our findings, that deficiency in service is not made out, are, as already stated, within the ambit of the Act 1986 (only), and may be read (only) as such. 12. Let a copy each of this Order be sent to the State Commission and to the respondents no. 1 and 2 i.e. the educational institution and the university by the Registry within ten days of pronouncement.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

28-08-2020 Pinnaccle Institute Engg. & Management Versus Biswajit Santra & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
27-08-2020 Ramu Annamalai & Others Versus M/s. G.I.Technology Private Limited, Perungudi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
26-08-2020 Dr.Prabaharan SRS Versus Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT) Represented by its Chancellor Dr. G. Viswanathan, Vellore & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
24-08-2020 B. Sunil Kumar & Another Versus Cochin University of Science & Technology, Rep. by Its Registrar & Others High Court of Kerala
04-08-2020 Birla Sun Life Insurance Co. Ltd. & Now Known As Aditiya Birla Sun Life Insurance Co. Ltd.), Maharashtra & Another Versus Narendra Pundlik Ramteke National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
14-07-2020 Rajeev Gandhi Memorial College of Engineering & Technology & Another Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh & Others Supreme Court of India
19-06-2020 The Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur & Another Versus Dr. Subroto Roy & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
01-06-2020 Aditya Birla Money Limited, Rep. By its Head – Legal & Compliance, L.R. Murali Krishnan Versus The National Stock Exchange of India Limited, Investors Services Cell, Kotturpuram & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
26-05-2020 O.R. Rahul & Others Versus Indian Institute of Space Science & Technology, Represented by Its Registrar, Thiruvananthapuram & Others High Court of Kerala
19-05-2020 M.G. Narasimha Rao Versus The Chairman, Board of Governors, Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-05-2020 Vestas Wind Technology India Private Limited Versus The Commercial Tax Officer, Enforcement, Roving Squad, Chengalpet & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
12-05-2020 Score Information Technology Ltd. Versus Central Organisation, Ex-Serviceman Contributory Health Scheme High Court of Delhi
04-05-2020 M/s. Cognizant Technology Solutions India Pvt. Ltd V/S The Assistant Commissioner of Labour And Two Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
04-05-2020 M/s. Cognizant Technology Solutions India Pvt. Ltd., rep. by its Authorized Signatory Versus The Appellate Authority under Section 48(1) of the A.P. Shops & Establishments Act, 1988 & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
04-05-2020 Priyambada Devi Birla & Birla Corporation Ltd. Versus Arvind Kumar Newar & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
15-04-2020 Bansal Infratech Synergies Limited Versus Gail India Limited High Court of Delhi
03-04-2020 Gaurav Kumar Bansal Versus Union of India & Another High Court of Delhi
18-03-2020 Abhighyan Bhattacharya & Another Versus School Of Engineering & Technology & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
16-03-2020 Jayakumar Assistant Professor-Cum-Assistant Director, Centre For Social Exclusion & Inclusion, Cochin University of Science & Technology, Kochi & Others Versus Dr. Jyothi S. Nair & Others High Court of Kerala
16-03-2020 Sanjeev Kumar Bansal Versus M/s. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-03-2020 Syrma Technology Private Limited, Chennai Versus Powerwave Technologies Sweden AD (in bankruptcy), Rep., by the Bankruptcy Administrator, Niklas Korling & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-03-2020 GBM Developers & Promoters P Ltd., Through its Director, Subhash Bansal, Chandigarh Versus Col. Sukhwant Singh Saini National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
13-03-2020 M.G. Mohan Kumar & Others Versus American Road Technology & Solutions Private Limited, Bengalore National Company Law Tribunal Bengaluru
05-03-2020 S.K. Bansal Versus HUDA National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
05-03-2020 Dr.(Mrs) Sania Akhtar, Working as Principal Director (Senior Principal Scientist), Central Institute of Plastics Engineering & Technology SARP, Bangalore Versus The Director General, Central Institute of Plastics Engineering & Technology, Ministry of Chemical & Fertilizers, Guindy, Chennai & Another Central Administrative Tribunal Bangalore Bench
05-03-2020 Dinesh Kumar Rao Versus G.B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology & Others High Court of Uttarakhand
04-03-2020 S. Aruputharaj Versus Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Secretary, Education, Science & Technology, Madras & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-03-2020 Anil Ramdas Pawar V/S Union of India, Through Secretary, Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, Department of Telecommunications & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
04-03-2020 Cognizant Technology Solutions India Pvt. Limited V/S Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Large Tax Payer Unit-1 Supreme Court of India
25-02-2020 Proprietor, Gandhi Institute of Management & TechnologyProprietor Sarbani Das Versus Alok Kumar Jha National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
25-02-2020 M/s. Cognizant Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd. Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Large Taxpayer Unit-I & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-02-2020 M.I.E.T. Engineering College, Rep. by its Chairman, Er.A. Mohamed Yunus, Trichy & Others Versus The Registrar, Anna University of Technology, Guindy & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
14-02-2020 Asim Kumar Pal & Others Versus Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
14-02-2020 The Anna University, Rep. by its Registrar, Anna University Campus, Chennai Versus Mahendra Institute of Technology, Rep. by its Principal, Namakkal & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-02-2020 Daniel Oommen Versus National Institute of Technology, Kozhikode, Represented by Its Registrar & Others High Court of Kerala
12-02-2020 Richa Jindal Versus Pec University of Technology & Another High Court of Punjab and Haryana
10-02-2020 Achal Bisht Versus Chandigarh Institute of Hotel Management & Catering Technology & Another High Court of Punjab and Haryana
07-02-2020 Devendra Bansal Versus National Insurance Company Ltd. & Another Madya Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Bhopal
07-02-2020 Birla Sun Life Insurance Co. Ltd Versus Meena Devi Madya Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Bhopal
06-02-2020 Mahesh Kumar Sharma Versus The Principal, Vidya Niketan Birla Public School, Pilani District Jhunjhunu & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
05-02-2020 Ravi Bansal Versus Bengal Unitech Universal Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Others West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
05-02-2020 Rasi Travels & Cargo Pvt. Ltd., Chennai & Another Versus Interglobe Technology Quotient Pvt. Ltd., A company having its Registered Office at Janpath, New Delhi & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
03-02-2020 Syndicate Bank V/S Narayanadri Institute of Science And Technology and Others. Debts Recovery Tribunal Hyderabad
30-01-2020 Pramod Poddar Versus Birla Sun Life Insurance Company Limited & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
30-01-2020 Vishnu Varma Pilli Versus The Union of India, Represented by Communication & Information Technology, Department of Electronics & Information Technology, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
29-01-2020 Chedde Mahesh Versus Birla Sun Life Insurance Co. Ltd & Another Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hyderabad
23-01-2020 Birla Sun Life Insurance Company Limited & Others Versus Sunita Madya Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Bhopal
17-01-2020 Masaddar Ali Laskar, Officer Surveyor, Office of the Director GDC, Assam Nagaland, GDC Versus The Union of India, Through the Secretary, To the Government of India, Department of Science & Technology, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
16-01-2020 Ruchika Kedia Versus The Internal Complaints, Goa Institute of Management, Valpoi, Goa, through its President Prof. Annamika Sinha, Goa Institute of Management & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
13-01-2020 The Principal , Global Institute of Fashion Technology (GIFT) & Another Versus Bikramadittya Sai & Others West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
07-01-2020 Commissioner of Income Tax, "Aaykar Bhavan" Versus Gigabyte Technology (India) Ltd. In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
07-01-2020 Haryana Urban Development Authority Versus Bindu Bansal & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
06-01-2020 Union of India, Represented by Its Secretary, Department of Posts, Ministry of Communication & Information Technology, New Delhi Versus Shibu M. Job, Now Working as Director (Postal Life Insurance), Kolkatha & Others High Court of Kerala
06-01-2020 Sanjila Bansal Versus M/s. Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
17-12-2019 M/s. Lanco Hills Technology Park Pvt Ltd. Versus Manisha Balkrishna Kulkarni & Another Supreme Court of India
11-12-2019 D.R. College of Engg. & Technology, College Campus at V&PO Kakoda Versus Nitin Parashar Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission New Delhi
05-12-2019 State of NCT of Delhi Versus Shiv Charan Bansal & Others Supreme Court of India
04-12-2019 Shubham Bansal Versus The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi ) & Another High Court of Delhi
02-12-2019 Basava Engineering School of Technology Rep. by its Principal B.J. Patil Versus State of Karnataka Rep. by its Prl. Secretary Department of Technical Education High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench OF Kalaburagi
29-11-2019 The Management, GVK Emergency Management & Research Institute, Teynampet Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Head Quarter), Teynampet & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
29-11-2019 Birla Sun Life Insurance Company Ltd. & Another Versus Ashok Kumar Kuthiala Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Shimla
26-11-2019 The State Head Operations, GVK Emergency Management and Research Institute (EMRI), 108 Ambulance Services, Behind Labour Commissioner's Office, DMS Compound, Teynampet Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Head Quarter), DMS Campus, Teynampet & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
26-11-2019 The Management GVK Emergency Management and Research Institute, Behind Labour Commissioner's Office, Chennai Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Head Quarter), Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
26-11-2019 The Management, GVK Emergency Management & Research Institute, Behind Labour Commissioner's Office, Teynampet Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Head Quarter), Teynampet & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
26-11-2019 The Management GVK Emergency Management & Research Institute, Chennai Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Head Quarter), Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
26-11-2019 Mahendra Institute of Technology, Rep. by its Principal, Salem Versus The Anna University, Rep. by its Registrar, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
21-11-2019 The Registrar, National Institute of Fashion Technology, N.I.F.T. Campus, Taramani, Chennai & Another Versus Sam D. Raja Prabhu & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
18-11-2019 M/s. Meenakshi Industries, Rep. by its Partner, Salil Bansal, Villupuram Versus The Assistant Commissioner of (CT) Villpuram – II Assessment Circle High Court of Judicature at Madras
15-11-2019 The Management of M/s. Birla Te Versus Chunni Lal High Court of Delhi
13-11-2019 Biju Borah Versus Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, To the Department of Posts, Government of India, Ministry of Communication Information & Technology, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
13-11-2019 Majaffar Hussain Versus The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Communications & Information Technology, Department of Posts, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
11-11-2019 Prince Bansal Versus M/s. Mercedes Benz India Private Limited & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
08-11-2019 Ranjit Sukla Baidya, Tripura Versus Union of India, Represented by the Secretary cum Commissioner, Department of Post, Ministry of Communication & Technology, Government of India, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
29-10-2019 K.A. Mohammed Manikfan, Junior Scientific Officer, Department of Science & Technology, Kavaratti Versus Union of India, Rep. by The Administrator, Union Territory of Lakshadweep, Kavaratti & Others High Court of Kerala
23-10-2019 Teledata Technology Solutions Versus Official Liquidator High Court of Judicature at Madras
17-10-2019 Gujarat Gas Limited Versus Richa Kamlesh Bansal Gujarat State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Ahmedabad
15-10-2019 Birla Sun Life Insurance Co. Ltd. & Another Versus Golla Venkateswaramma Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Hyderabad
11-10-2019 R. Rajkumar & Others Versus Union of India, Represented by Its Principal Secretary, Ministry of Science & Technology, Department of Science & Technology, New Delhi & Another High Court of Kerala
11-10-2019 M/s. Saptarishi Hotels Pvt. Ltd. & Another Versus National Institute of Tourism & Hospitality Management (NITHM) High Court of for the State of Telangana
09-10-2019 Sudesh Kumar Bansal Versus Ajay Saini & Others High Court of Delhi
26-09-2019 Snehacharya Institute of Management & Technology Versus State of Kerala High Court of Kerala
24-09-2019 B.M. Birla Heart Research Centre Versus State of West Bengal & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
17-09-2019 Sanjay Bansal Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
14-09-2019 Directorate of Enforcement (PMLA) through its Assistant Director, Kolkata Versus Eastern Institute for Integrated Learning in Management University, East Sikkim High Court of Sikkim
11-09-2019 Ramsay Exim & Technology Private Limited & Others ICICI Bank Limited & Another High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
06-09-2019 Cognizant Technology Solutions India Pvt. Ltd., Chennai Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Large Tax Payer Unit, Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
05-09-2019 Water and Land Management Institute, Kanchanwadi, Aurangabad, (Original Through its Director General & Others Versus Sudhakar Namdeo Gaikwad & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
29-08-2019 Dr. G. Sadasivan Nair, Rtd. Professor & Director of School of Legal Studies, Cochin University of Science & Technology, Kochi & Another Versus Cochin University of Science & Technology, Represented by Its Registrar, Kochi & Others High Court of Kerala
26-08-2019 Naresh Bansal Versus State (GNCTD) & Others High Court of Delhi
20-08-2019 Birla Sun Life Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus Konchada Ravi Kumar National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
20-08-2019 Sudhan Ranjan Bhowmik Versus Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Department of Science & Technology, Ministry of Science & Technology, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
20-08-2019 Indian Institute of Planning & Management Versus Paramjit Singh Rekhi National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
19-08-2019 Bharti Airtel Limited & Another Versus Maharashtra Information Technology Corporation Limited & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
14-08-2019 Jagjit Singh @ Jagjit Singh Ahluwalia @ Jagjit Singh Walia @ J S Ahluwalia @ J S Walia Versus Rajesh Bansal & Others High Court of Punjab and Haryana
08-08-2019 Software Technology Parks of India, Chennai Versus Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
08-08-2019 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary to Government Environment, Forests, Science & Technology Department, Secretariat, Guntur District & Others Versus R.V. Prakash High Court of Andhra Pradesh
06-08-2019 Tapas Malakar Versus The Union of India Represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Communication & Information Technology, Government of India, Central Secretariat, New Delhi & Others High Court of Tripura
05-08-2019 Jarnail Singh Versus Bansal X-Ray Centre Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Chandigarh
05-08-2019 Kashish Country Resort Pvt. Ltd. Versus M/s. Bansal Sales Corporation High Court of Delhi
02-08-2019 Global Institute of Fashion Technology (G.I.F.T) Versus Shaista Parveen West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata