w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Ashok Kumar Mehra & Another v/s The State of Punjab


Company & Directors' Information:- K R MEHRA & CO PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U15410DL2012PTC234602

Company & Directors' Information:- A. MEHRA AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51109DL2000PTC105672

    Criminal Appeal Nos. 1466-1467 of 2008

    Decided On, 15 April 2019

    At, Supreme Court of India

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI

    For the Appellants: Yash Pal Dhingra, Advocate. For the Respondent: Rohit Kumar Singh, Jaspreet Gogia, Advocates.



Judgment Text

Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.

These appeals are directed against the final judgment and order dated 21.07.2008 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal No. 681-DBA of 2000 and Criminal Revision No. 1242 of 2000 whereby the High Court allowed the criminal appeal filed by respondent No. 1 (State) herein and the criminal revision filed by respondent No. 2 (Complainant) herein by setting aside the judgment dated 06.06.2000 passed by the Sessions Judge, Rupnagar in Sessions Case No. 10 of 1998 and convicted both the appellants for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860(hereinafter referred to as "IPC") and sentenced them to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/-each. In default of payment of fine, they shall undergo further rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months each.

2. A few facts need mention hereinbelow for the disposal of these appeals.

3. Appellant No.1-Ashok Kumar Mehra is the father of appellant No. 2-Kushwant@Sukhwant Kumar Mehra. Both the appellants, i.e., father and son were prosecuted for commission of the offence of committing murder of one Inderjit Dhiman. The Sessions Judge by judgment/order dated 06.06.2000 passed in Sessions Case No. 10/1998 acquitted both the appellants.

4. The State and the Complainant both felt aggrieved and filed criminal appeal and criminal revision in the High Court. By impugned order, the High Court allowed the criminal appeal as well as the criminal revision and while reversing the judgment of acquittal passed by the Sessions Judge, convicted both the appellants and awarded them life sentence, which has given rise to filing of these appeals by both the accused persons, i.e., father and son.

5. Heard Mr. T.S. Doabia, learned senior counsel for the appellants and Mr. Ankit Swarup & Ms. Jaspreet Gogia, learned counsel for the respondents.

6. Mr. T.S. Doabia, learned senior counsel for the appellants, at the outset, stated that so far as the appellant No.1-Ashok Kumar Mehra, i.e., father is concerned, he has expired during the pendency of these appeals. Learned counsel then brought to our notice that so far as appellant No.2-Kushwant @ Sukhwant Kumar Mehra, i.e., son is concerned, he was juvenile on the date of commission of the offence.

7. In our opinion, so far as appeal filed by appellant No.1-Ashok Kumar Mehra, i.e., father is concerned, the same stands abated on account of his death. In this view of the matter, the appeal filed by appellant No. 1 is accordingly dismissed as abated.

8. Now so far as the appeal filed by appellant No. 2 - Sukhwant Kumar, i.e., son is concerned, the same, in our view, deserves to be allowed in thelight of law laid down by this Court in a recent decision of this Court in Raju vs. The State of Haryana, 2019(4) SCALE 398 wherein a similar question was involved. This is what was held by this Court (Three Judge Bench) in Paras 9, 10, and 25 as under:

"9. It is by now well-settled, as was held in Hari Ram v. State of Rajasthan, (2009) 13 SCC 211, that in light of Sections 2(k), 2(I), 7A read with Section 20 of the 2000 Act as amended in 2006, a juvenile who had not completed eighteen years on the date of commission of the offence is entitled to the benefit of the 2000 Act (also see Mohan Mali v. State of Madhya Pradesh, (2010) 6 SCC 669; Daya Nand v. State of Haryana, (2011) 2 SCC 224; Dharambir v. State (NCT) of Delhi (supra); Jitendra Singh @ Babboo Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2013) 11 SCC 193). It is equally well-settled that the claim of juvenility can be raised at any stage before any Court by an accused, including this Court, even after the final disposal of a case, in terms of Section 7A of the 2000 Act (see Dharambir v. State (NCT) of Delhi, (supra), Abuzar Hossain v. State of West Bengal, (2012) 10 SCC 489; Jitendra Singh @ Babboo Singh v. State of UP, (supra); Abdul Razzaq v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2015) 15 SCC 637).

10. In light of the above legal position, it is evident that the Appellant would be entitled to the benefit of the 2000 Act if his age is determined to be below 18 years on the date of commission of the offence. Moreover, it would be irrelevant that the plea of juvenility was not raised before the Trial Court, in light of Section 7A. As per the report of the inquiry conducted by the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court, in this case, the Appellant was below 18 years of age on the date of commission of the offence. The only question before us that needs to be determined is whether such report may be given precedence over the contrary view taken by the High Court, so that the benefit of the 2000 Act may be given to the Appellant.

25. Criminal Appeal hereby stands allowed and the order of the High Court affirming the conviction and sentence of the Appellant under Section 376(2)(g) of the IPC is set aside. Seeing that the Appellant has already spent 6 years in imprisonment, whereas the maximum period for which a juvenile may be sent to a special home is only 3 years as per Section 15(1)(g) of the 2000 Act, and since the Appellant has already been enlarged on bail by virtue of the order of the Court dated 09.05.2014, he need not be taken into custody. His bail bonds stand discharged and all proceedings against him, so far as they relate to the present case, stand terminated."

9. When we examine the facts of the case of appellant No. 2 in the light of law laid down in the case of Raju (supra), we find that appellant No. 2 was born on 14.06.1980 whereas the date of commission of the offence is 04.01.1998.

10. It is, therefore, an admitted fact that appellant No. 2 was a juvenile (he was below the age of 18 years, i.e., he was 17 years and 5 months) on the date of the commission of the offence (04.01.1998). In other words, appellant No. 2 had not completed the age of 18 years on the date of commission of the offence, i.e., on 04.01.1998.

11. Though this fact was neither brought to the notice of the Sessions Judge and nor the High Court and was brought to the notice of this Court for the first time by appellant No. 2 in this appeal, yet in the light of law laid down by this Court in several decisions referred to in Para 10 of the decision in Raju (supra), appellant No. 2 is entitled to raise this plea even in this appeal.

12. Now, so far as the issue relating to the genuineness of the date of birth of appellant No. 2 is concerned, firstly, it is not in dispute that appellant No. 2 had filed his date of birth certificate in the Sessions Court; Secondly, the prosecution did not object to the correctness of the birth certificate before the Sessions Judge; Thirdly, this Court by order dated 11.07.2011 granted bail to appellant No. 2 on this ground observing therein that since he was juvenile at the time of commission of the offence and was below 18 years, which was not disputed by the respondent-State; and lastly, even at the time of hearing of this appeal, learned counsel for the respondent-State did not dispute the date o

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

f birth certificate of appellant No. 2. 13. In the light of these four reasons, we are of the view that it is not necessary to hold any further inquiry on this question. 14. In view of the foregoing discussion, we are of the considered opinion that since appellant No. 2 was a juvenile on the date of commission of the offence and though till date he has already undergone considerable jail sentence partly as an under-trial and partly as a convict, yet the appeal filed by appellant No. 2 has to be allowed as was done in the case of Raju (supra) without going into the merits of the case and passing any other consequential order in that regard. 15. The appeal of appellant No. 2 is accordingly allowed. The impugned order qua appellant No. 2 is set aside.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

25-06-2020 Rahul Mehra @ Daddu Versus State of Karnataka, State by Ramanagara Rural Police, Bangalore High Court of Karnataka
29-04-2020 BCH Electric Limited Versus Pradeep Mehra Supreme Court of India
28-01-2020 Parsvnath Developers Limited Versus Sangeeta Mehra & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
01-11-2019 Mehra Cosmetics Versus Ram Kumar Gulati & Others High Court of Delhi
11-10-2019 Less Than Equals Three Services Pvt. Ltd. & Another Versus Paras Mehra & Others High Court of Delhi
21-08-2019 Union of India & Others Versus T.R. Mehra Supreme Court of India
17-07-2019 Atul Gulati & Another Versus Varsha Mehra & Others High Court of Delhi
02-05-2019 Vijay Mehra Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
01-05-2019 Maharashtra Archery Association Versus Rahul Mehra & Others Supreme Court of India
02-04-2019 Ashok Mehra Versus Enforcement Officer High Court of Punjab and Haryana
27-02-2019 Sunder Lal Mehra Versus State of Madhya Pradesh High Court of Madhya Pradesh
19-02-2019 Shravan. A. Mehra & Another Versus Superintendent of Central Tax, Represented by the Authorised Officer & or Prosecutor Attached this Honble Court High Court of Karnataka
12-02-2019 BCH Electric Limited Versus Pradeep Mehra High Court of Delhi
06-02-2019 M/s. BCH Electric Limited Versus Pradeep Mehra & Others High Court of Delhi
05-02-2019 Parvin Mehra & Others Versus The Arya Samaj, Lawrence Road, Amritsar & Others High Court of Punjab and Haryana
10-01-2019 Sangeeta Mehra & Another Versus M/s. Parsvnath Developers Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission New Delhi
08-01-2019 Thomas Gervase & Another Versus Ravin Mehra High Court of Delhi
04-01-2019 Ram Das Mehra Versus Sunil Kumar Gupta High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
01-11-2018 Ajay Mehra Versus M/s. Reebok India Company & Another Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh
26-10-2018 Tripat Chaudhary & Another Versus Arundhati Sapru Mehra & Another High Court of Delhi
08-10-2018 Deepak Mehra & Others Versus M/s. EMAAR MGF Land Limited & Others Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh
28-08-2018 Ashwani Kumar Mehra Versus Canara Bank High Court of Delhi
20-07-2018 Sunil Mehra Versus The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) High Court of Delhi
12-07-2018 Arvind Kumar Mehra Versus State of M.P. & Others High Court of Madhya Pradesh
02-07-2018 Monika Mehra & Another Versus State & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
30-05-2018 CDR Rohit Mehra (0369W) Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Delhi
29-05-2018 Ajay Mehra V/S C.E, C. & C.G.S.T., Delhi-1 Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal New Delhi
23-03-2018 Satyendra Kumar Mehra @ Satendera Kumar Mehra Versus State of Jharkhand Supreme Court of India
20-03-2018 M/s. Emerging Valley (P) Ltd. & Another Versus Kirti Mehra & Others Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh
15-01-2018 Sanjay Mehra Versus Kores India Ltd. High Court of Delhi
31-10-2017 Rahul Mehra Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Delhi
30-10-2017 Krishan Murari Mehra Versus State High Court of Delhi
18-08-2017 Ramesh Kumar Mehra Versus Ajay Kumar Barman (Khettry) & Others High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
10-08-2017 Rahul Mehra Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Delhi
02-08-2017 Mohinder Kumar Mehra Versus Roop Rani Mehra High Court of Delhi
16-05-2017 Ameeta Mehra Versus Additional Director of Income Tax (Inv)-Unit & Another High Court of Delhi
16-05-2017 Ameeta Mehra Versus Additional Director of Income Tax (Inv)-Unit & Another High Court of Delhi
08-05-2017 Mehrangarh Museum Trust through Secretary, Reg. Office Umaid Bhawan & Others Versus Inder Singh Mehra & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jodhpur Bench
29-03-2017 Nalini Mehra Versus Group Captain H. Kaushal & Another Supreme Court of India
09-01-2017 Yogendra Mehra Versus State of Jharkhand & Others High Court of Jharkhand
27-10-2016 Rubi Mehra Versus State of U.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
09-08-2016 Antonio Sergio Costa @ Tony Costa Versus Rashi Amit Mehra & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
04-08-2016 Raj Kumar Mehra & Another Versus Surinder Mohan High Court of Himachal Pradesh
29-07-2016 Rajan Mehra Versus Geetanjali Mehra High Court of Delhi
23-05-2016 Yogesh Mehra Versus Amit Aggarwal High Court of Delhi
23-05-2016 Asha Versus Raj Kumar Mehra & Others High Court of Himachal Pradesh
21-04-2016 Pratibha Mehra Versus State of Haryana & Another High Court of Punjab and Haryana
21-03-2016 In the Matter of: Rajiv Savara Versus Darrameks Hotels & Developers Pvt. Ltd., Managing Director, Arjun Mehra & Others National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
15-03-2016 National Insurance Co. Ltd. Versus Kailash Mehra & Others High Court of Punjab and Haryana
07-12-2015 Manish Mehra Versus Ramlal Gupta High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
12-10-2015 Commissioner of Income-tax-II, Agra Versus Shimbhu Mehra High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
09-09-2015 M/s Inox Air Products Limited, through its Company Secretary, Sri Narendra Mehra, R/o 402A Jewel Tower, Jogani Complex, Santacruz(E), PO & PS- Santacruz(E), Mumbai Versus Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL), through its Chairman High Court of Jharkhand
29-07-2015 Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited Versus Shyam Narain Mehra & Brothers High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
30-06-2015 Santosh Kumari Mehra Since Deceased Thr Lrs Versus Om Prakash High Court of Delhi
04-06-2015 Kartik Mehra Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle-XVII, Kolkata Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Kolkata
22-05-2015 For the Petitioner: S.D. Singh, Prasenjit Mohapatra, Advocates. For the Respondents: Rajeeve Mehra, Sr. Advocate with Nikhil Jain, Aditya Malhotra, Advocates. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
24-04-2015 S.P. Mehra Versus Syndicate Bank & Others High Court of Delhi
23-04-2015 Sh. Raj Kumar Mehra & Another Versus Sh. Surinder Mohan High Court of Himachal Pradesh
11-03-2015 Mehra Brothers Partnership Firms Filling Versus Commissioner of Income Tax & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
10-03-2015 Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Versus Ruchi Mehra & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
19-02-2015 Commissioner of Income-tax Versus Nishi Mehra High Court of Delhi
23-12-2014 N.N. Ojha Versus Prem Mehra High Court of Delhi
15-12-2014 Vipan Mehra, Proprietor M/s. V.M. Jewellers Versus United India Insurance Co. Ltd. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
04-12-2014 Om Prasad Sarin & Another Versus Ajit Mehra & Others High Court of Delhi
28-10-2014 Mehra Radhika Versus Public Prosecutor Supreme Court of Singapore
29-09-2014 Rita Mehra & Another Versus State of Punjab, Through the Secretary to the Government of Punjab, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Chandigarh & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
17-07-2014 Vimal Mehra Versus State of U.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
02-06-2014 Dr. Aloys Wobben & Another Versus Yogesh Mehra & Others Supreme Court of India
28-04-2014 The Post Master, Burdwan Head Post Office & Others Versus Arun Kr. Mehra West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata
25-04-2014 Raj Kumar Mehra & Others Versus Sahara India Commercial Corporation Limited & Others Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Shimla
04-04-2014 National Insurance Company Limited & Another Versus Ajay Mehra Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Panchkula
05-03-2014 Vikrant Arora Versus Shruti Mehra @ Palak Arora & Another High Court of Punjab and Haryana
18-02-2014 Arun Mehra & Another Versus M/s. Durga Builders Private Ltd. & Others Company Law Board Principal Bench New Delhi
17-02-2014 Kasturi Lal Mehra Versus M/s. Narshi Pharmaceutical & Surgical (P) Ltd. High Court of Delhi
22-01-2014 British Airways Versus Dr. Mukesh Mehra Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission New Delhi
09-01-2014 Ram Prasad Versus Geeta Mehra High Court of Madhya Pradesh
12-11-2013 Arundhati Sapru Versus Yash Mehra High Court of Delhi
14-10-2013 Rajesh D. Vora Versus Aarti Mehra & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
01-10-2013 Moorti Devi Versus Pawan Mehra (Deceased) Through Lrs & Another High Court of Delhi
19-09-2013 Chanchal Dhingra Versus Raj Gopal Mehra High Court of Delhi
03-09-2013 Smt. Heeru Mehra Versus P.C., Systems, Thro Proprietor Pankaj Kumar Chouksey & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
02-09-2013 Salim Khan & Another Versus Sumeet Prakash Mehra & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
21-08-2013 Madhusudan Daulatram Mehra & Others Versus M/s. Jarakahi Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
08-08-2013 Delhi Jal Board Through its Zonal Revenue Officer South West III Versus Sh. O.P. Mehra, ACM (Retd.) National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
26-07-2013 Arun Mehra & Another Versus Ravinder Nanda & Others High Court of Delhi
29-05-2013 Deeraj Mehra Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
24-05-2013 Rohini Mehra Versus State & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
08-05-2013 Sunil Kumar Mehra Versus MCD & Another High Court of Delhi
07-05-2013 Fukku Mehra Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh High Court of Madhya Pradesh
03-04-2013 Adai Mehra Production Pvt. Ltd. Versus Sumeet P. Mehra & Another High Court of Judicature at Bombay
14-02-2013 Commissioner of Income-tax, Amritsar Versus Suresh Chander Mehra (HUF) High Court of Punjab and Haryana
01-02-2013 Octagon Builders & Promoters Pvt. Ltd, Delhi Versus Sh.Dilip Mehra, Gurgaon Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission New Delhi
09-01-2013 Mala Mehra Versus MCD & Others High Court of Delhi
02-01-2013 Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra & Another Versus Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi & Another High Court of Delhi
22-11-2012 Satish Mehra Versus State of N.C.T. of Delhi & Another Supreme Court of India
08-10-2012 Omprakash J. Mehra, Prop. Of M/s. Omprakash Durgada & Another Versus Official Liquidator of M/s. Surlex Diagnostic Ltd. High Court of Judicature at Bombay
04-09-2012 Yogesh Mehra & Others Versus Enercon Gmbh & Others Company Law Board Western Region Bench Mumbai
14-08-2012 Sab Singh Mehra Versus State of Uttarakhand & Others High Court of Uttarakhand
09-08-2012 Prashant Narula & Another Versus MCD, K.S. Mehra & Another High Court of Delhi
06-08-2012 Suresh Kumar Versus Satish Mehra & Another High Court of Delhi