w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Archna Sharma v/s Sudheer Sharma


Company & Directors' Information:- S C SHARMA AND CO PRIVATE LTD [Active] CIN = U74899DL1948PTC001507

Company & Directors' Information:- SHARMA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74999UP2008PTC035620

Company & Directors' Information:- K P SHARMA (INDIA) PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U51109WB1988PTC045569

Company & Directors' Information:- SHARMA CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909WB2017PTC220657

Company & Directors' Information:- P C SHARMA AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45201DL1981PTC012750

Company & Directors' Information:- J. R. SHARMA & COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U24211DL1966PTC004602

Company & Directors' Information:- M K SHARMA AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74994DL1982PTC014090

Company & Directors' Information:- SHARMA AND SHARMA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74900DL2015PTC276949

Company & Directors' Information:- SHARMA & CO. PVT LTD. [Strike Off] CIN = U28991WB1949PTC018064

    Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 300 of 2018

    Decided On, 23 January 2020

    At, High Court of Rajasthan

    By, THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

    For the Appellant: Saransh Saini, Advocate. For the Respondent: Hans Kumar Sharma, Advocate.



Judgment Text


Narendra Singh Dhaddha, J.

1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant-wife against the order of the learned Family Court No. 3, Jaipur passed on 20.12.2017, whereby the learned Family Court had allowed the petition filed by the respondent husband under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short ‘the Act’).

2. Brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 8.5.2014 as per Hindu rites and rituals. Initially, the appellant behaved properly but after a few days, her behaviour towards the respondent-husband and his family changed drastically. She started acting as per her mother’s directions, did not do any household chores and always created an environment of stress. The appellant also pressurized the respondent to throw his sister and her daughter from their house. Due to the ill-deeds of the appellant, the father of the respondent asked the appellant and the respondent to live separately as per the appellant’s wish.

3. Even after living separately in Dausa, the behaviour of the appellant did not change and on 25.11.2014, she without informing the respondent went to her parental house in Jaipur early in the morning along with all the jewellery and cash. During the attempts of bringing the appellant back, the respondent took her to Jawahar Circle on 25.7.2015 but their conversation was continuously interrupted by the appellant’s mother. As it got late in the night, the respondent took a room in B.L. Hotel at Tonk Phatak for night stay. The appellant in the morning told everything to her mother. The appellant’s parents on 26.7.2015 lodged a false case of kidnapping against the respondent and his parents and made them suffer lot of mental agony. On 27.7.2015, the appellant along with her parents and relatives went to the respondent’s house and started shouting loudly due to which all the people of the colony came to the respondent’s house. The appellant’s mother called the police and the respondent was asked to take the appellant to their house in Dausa. But on 30.7.2015, the appellant without any valid reason came back to Jaipur and gave up all her marital relations. The respondent tried all the possible means to bring her back but the appellant lodged a false case against the respondent and his family. Due to the cruel behaviour of the appellant, it was not possible to stay with her and therefore, it was prayed for the dissolution of their marriage.

4. Appellant wife, in her written statement, denied the allegations levelled by the respondent and stated that immediately after their marriage, the respondent’s family started cursing the appellant and her family for lack of arrangements in their wedding. Also, the respondent and his family demanded Rs. 2,00,000 and a car and treated her with cruelty. The appellant stated that the respondent denied to cohabit with her. The appellant never had any objection to the respondent’s sister and her daughter living with them. The family members of the respondent used to beat the appellant, she was made to stay inside the house, she was abused and an advertisement in the newspaper to evict the appellant was published by the respondent’s father.

5. The appellant further stated that the respondent husband forcefully took her to Dausa where there was no source of food and water. When asked for basic amenities, the appellant was beaten and thrown out of the house by the respondent. On 25.7.2015, the appellant was forcefully made to sit in the respondent’s car and he switched off her cellphone. He took her to a hotel at Tonk Road where he used force on her, when the appellant shouted for help she was threatened to be killed, her sister would be raped and her father and brother would be killed. On 27.5.2015, when the appellant went to her in-laws place the respondent shouted at his mother to lock the main door of the house. On this incident, the appellant informed the police and only after police’s interference the respondent agreed to keep the appellant with her and took her to Dausa. On 30.7.2015, the appellant was again thrown out of the respondent’s house (Dausa). The appellant went to respondent’s house many times but the house was locked and also the respondent never answered her calls. The appellant alleged that the respondent under a conspiracy usurped all the dowry articles of the appellant and wanted to take decree of divorce on false issues and earn money by the means of second marriage. Therefore, the divorce petition be rejected.

6. On the basis of the pleadings, the following issues were framed by the learned Family Court:

“(1) Whether the non petitioner wife after marital rituals behaved the petitioner with cruelty?

(2) Relief.”

7. The respondent examined himself as AW-1 and as witnesses AW-2 Smt. Meeta Sharma, AW-3-Yogesh Parashar and AW-4 Mahesh Dixit and appellant examined herself as NAW-1 and the witnesses NAW-2 Manju Sharma.

8. Learned Family Court heard the arguments and allowed the petition filed by the respondent and passed a decree of divorce against the appellant.

9. Learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that the impugned order dated 20.12.2017 is illegal and arbitrary and against the material available on record.

10. Learned Family Court while passing the impugned judgment ignored the mala fides, after thoughts and the fact that the entire allegation in the petition are based on concocted story. Appellant had not committed cruelty to the respondent and his family members. She never denied for physical relationship. Respondent’s father expelled them from his property as per his own wish and not on account of the behaviour of the appellant. She had fulfilled her marital obligations. Respondent and his family members tortured her for want of dowry. Respondent had denied to establish physical relations for want of Rs.2,00,000 and a car. She had not levelled allegation of impotency against the respondent. Respondent had given notice in which he had not mentioned the allegation of impotency. She had not lodged false complaint against the respondent because after completion of investigation, charge-sheet was filed against the respondent under Sections 498-A and 406, IPC and the case was still lying pending against him.

11. Learned Counsel for the appellant further submitted that appellant had gone to her matrimonial home on 27.7.2015 but respondent and his family members had closed the door. So, she had called the police. Respondent’s father wrongly initiated criminal proceedings under Sections 107 and 106 against her. Learned Family Court had not considered these facts and passed the decree of divorce against her. So, this appeal be allowed and decree of divorce be set-aside.

12. Learned Counsel for the respondent submitted that there is no illegality and infirmity in the order of the learned Family Court. Appellant lodged a criminal case against the respondent levelling allegation of kidnapping and rape against him but after investigation, these allegations were not found correct. Appellant had also levelled allegation of impotency. Her behaviour was cruel with respondent and his family members. So, appeal be dismissed.

13. We have given our thoughtful consideration to the arguments advanced by both the parties, perused the impugned order and the material available on record.

14. Appellant had lodged false complaint against the respondent for the offence of kidnapping and rape. These allegations were not found correct in the investigation. Appellant also alleged the respondent being impotent. She had left the respondent’s house of her own Will. Respondent’s father had expelled his son from his property due to the behaviour of appellant. Appellant had broken her bangles and removed the vermillion (sindoor). So, the learned Family Court rightly came to the conclusion that these acts of the appellant amount to cruelty.

15. In the case of K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa, reported in I (2013) DMC 458 (SC)=II (2013) SLT 338=2013 (5) SCC 226, the Hon’ble Supreme Court observed as under:

“16. Thus, to the instances illustrative of mental cruelty noted in Samar Ghosh v. Jaya Ghosh, 2007 (4) SCC 511, we could add a few more. Making unfounded indecent defamatory allegations against the spouse or his or her relatives in the pleadings, filing of complaints or issuing notices or news items which may have adverse impact on the business prospect or the job of the spouse and filing repeated false complaints and cases in the Court against the spouse would, in the facts of a case, amount to causing mental cruelty to the other spouse.”

16. In the case of Ravi Kumar v. Julmidevi, reported in I (2010) DMC 411 (SC)=I (2010) SLT 759=2010(4) SCC 476, the Hon’ble Supreme Court observed as under:

“19. It may be true that there is no definition of cruelty under the said Act. Actually such a definition is not possible. In matrimonial relationship, cruelty would obviously mean absence of mutual respect and understanding between the spouses which embitters the relationship and often leads to various outbursts of behaviour which can be termed as cruelty. Sometime cruelty in a matrimonial relationship may take the form of violence, sometime it may take a different form. At

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

times, it may be just an attitude or an approach. Silence in some situations may amount to cruelty. 20. Therefore, cruelty in matrimonial behaviour defies any definition and its categories can never be closed. Whether the husband is cruel to his wife or the wife is cruel to her husband has to be ascertained and judged by taking into account the entire facts and circumstances of the given case and not by any predetermined rigid formula. Cruelty in matrimonial cases can be of infinite variety—it may be subtle or even brutal and may be by gestures and words. That possibly explains why Lord Denning in Sheldon v. Sheldon, (1966) 2 WLR 993, held that categories of cruelty in matrimonial cases are never closed.” In the light of the laws discussed and analysis of the facts, we find no illegality or infirmity in the order dated 20.12.2017 passed by the learned Family Court. Therefore, the appeal being devoid of merit, is liable to be rejected. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed. Appeal dismissed.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

23-09-2020 Charu Sharma & Others Versus Birla Sun Life Insurance Company Ltd., Maharshtra & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-09-2020 Arun Sharma Versus Roxann Sharma In the High Court of Bombay at Goa
08-09-2020 Arun Kumar Sharma Versus Adesh Goel & Others High Court of Delhi
07-09-2020 Suneeta Sharma Versus Greater Mohali Area Development Authority, Punjab & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
02-09-2020 All India Union Bank Officer, Staff Association Rep. by its General Secretary, AIBOA, Chennai Versus Brajeshwar Sharma, The Chief General Manager(HR) Union Bank of India, Mumbai High Court of Judicature at Madras
31-08-2020 Rajesh Kumar Sharma @ Rajesh Kumar Versus C.B.I. High Court of Delhi
26-08-2020 Oriental Insurance Company Limited Versus Nand Kishore Sharma & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
25-08-2020 Abhishek Sharma @ Chanchal Pandit Versus State of U.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
24-08-2020 Sanjay Kumar Sharma & Another Versus Union of India & Another High Court of Gauhati
24-08-2020 ICICI Bank, ICICI Bank Through Manager, Rajasthan Versus Ram Prakash Sharma National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
21-08-2020 H.N. Sharma & Anr versus Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors. High Court of Judicature at Madras
14-08-2020 Nipun Sharma Versus Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Sector 12, Chandigarh High Court of Punjab and Haryana
14-08-2020 Union of India & Another Versus M/s. K.C. Sharma & Co. & Others Supreme Court of India
11-08-2020 V.P. Sharma & Others Versus Dr. G.S. Kochar Surgeon Urologist) & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
11-08-2020 Vineeta Sharma V/S Rakesh Sharma and Others. Supreme Court of India
11-08-2020 Vineeta Sharma Versus Rakesh Sharma & Others Supreme Court of India
07-08-2020 Vijay Ramswarup Sharma Versus State of Gujarat High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
06-08-2020 Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd., Rajasthan Versus Kailash Chand Sharma National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
27-07-2020 Manish Sharma & Another Versus Urmila Arora High Court of Delhi
21-07-2020 Ex-Subedar Vinod Kumar Sharma Versus National Insurance Co. Ltd. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
24-06-2020 Tara Prasad Sharma Versus State of Sikkim & Others High Court of Sikkim
23-06-2020 Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., Through The General Manager & Another Versus Narendra Kumar Sharma National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
22-06-2020 Ashok Sharma Versus State of Assam & Another High Court of Gauhati
17-06-2020 Aman Sharma Versus The Chief Election Commissioner & Another High Court of Madhya Pradesh
15-06-2020 Rajan Sharma & Another Versus Union of India & Another Supreme Court of India
02-06-2020 Prateek Sharma & Another Versus Union of India & Another High Court of Delhi
30-05-2020 Kshitiz Sharma Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
19-05-2020 Mukesh Sharma Versus C.V. Ramana High Court of for the State of Telangana
19-05-2020 Randhir Rambrij Sharma Versus Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation High Court of Judicature at Bombay
14-05-2020 Meena Sharma Versus Nand Lal & Another High Court of Delhi
06-05-2020 Kamla Sharma Versus North Delhi Municipal Corporation High Court of Delhi
29-04-2020 Anurag Sarmah @ Sharma Versus State of Assam & Another High Court of Gauhati
22-04-2020 Anand Sharma Versus State of Rajasthan & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
20-04-2020 Dr. Mahesh Sharma & Another Versus Cabinet Secretary, Govt. of India, Cabinet Secretariat, New Delhi & Others High Court of Rajasthan
15-04-2020 Sanjeev Sharma Versus State (N.C.T. of Delhi) High Court of Delhi
13-04-2020 Mamta Sharma & Another Versus State of Chhattisgarh Through The Chief Secretary, Chhattisgarh & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
08-04-2020 C.H. Sharma & Another Versus State of Maharashtra & Others In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
08-04-2020 Mohmmad Yunus Versus Madho Prasad Sharma High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
30-03-2020 Prashant Sharma Versus State of Sikkim & Others High Court of Sikkim
23-03-2020 Rajasthan Public Service Commission & Others Versus Megha Sharma & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
20-03-2020 Anju Sharma Versus Sunita Kumari & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
18-03-2020 Shambhu Prasad Sharma Advocate Versus Renu Jogi High Court of Chhattisgarh
18-03-2020 State of M.P. & Others Versus Rajendra Kumar Sharma High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwailor
18-03-2020 Saurav Sharma Versus State of HP & Others High Court of Himachal Pradesh
17-03-2020 Aashu Pandit @ Aashu Bajpai @ Aash Narayan Sharma Versus Union of India High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Lucknow Bench
13-03-2020 Unnati Bhardwaj & Another Versus K.P. Sharma High Court of Delhi
11-03-2020 Ajay Sharma & Others Versus Kulwant Singh High Court of Delhi
06-03-2020 Rampal Sharma & Others Versus State of Rajasthan & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
05-03-2020 M/s. N.K. Enterprise, West Bengal & Another V/S Narayan Prasad Sharma & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
05-03-2020 Sancha Bahadur Subba Versus Ramesh Sharma High Court of Sikkim
04-03-2020 Ashok Kumar Sharma Versus Nirmaldas Manikpuri High Court of Chhattisgarh
04-03-2020 Amitabh Versus Amit Rghunandan Saran Sharma & Another In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
28-02-2020 Dilip Kumar Sharma Versus State of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh
25-02-2020 Mahesh Kumar Sharma Versus The Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, New Delhi & Others Central Administrative Tribunal Guwahati Bench Guwahati
24-02-2020 Sarwan Kumar Sharma Versus Ranjana Sharma @ Ranjana Rani & Another High Court of Delhi
19-02-2020 Bhupendra Sharma & Others Versus Union of India, Represented By The Secretary Ministry of Defence, New Delhi & Others High Court of Kerala
18-02-2020 ICICI Bank Ltd., Rajashtan & Others Versus Ravindra Kumar Sharma & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
18-02-2020 M/s. Reliance General Insurance Company Versus Rakesh Sharma & Others Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission New Delhi
17-02-2020 Ram Prakash Sharma Versus State of Bihar High Court of Judicature at Patna
14-02-2020 Vinay Sharma Versus Union of India & Others Supreme Court of India
13-02-2020 Harinarayan Sharma Versus Vijay Kumar Soni National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
12-02-2020 Umesh Chand Sharma & Others Versus Parsvnath Developers Limited National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
12-02-2020 Praveen Kumar Sharma Versus State of U.P. through its Principal Secretary (Home), Secretariat, Lucknow, U.P. & Others High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
11-02-2020 Shashibala M. Sharma Versus ICICI Bank Ltd. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
10-02-2020 Brahmacharimayum Achou Sharma & Others Versus The State of Manipur through the Chief Secretary-cum-Secretary (Power), Govt. of Manipur & Others High Court of Manipur
10-02-2020 Mukulika Sharma & Others Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Secondary Education, Govt. of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
06-02-2020 Mahesh Kumar Sharma Versus The Principal, Vidya Niketan Birla Public School, Pilani District Jhunjhunu & Others High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
06-02-2020 Vipin Sharma Versus Securities and Exchange Board of India, SEBI Bhavan SEBI Securities amp Exchange Board of India Securities Appellate Tribunal
06-02-2020 Kanwar Pal Sharma Versus State (NCT of Delhi) High Court of Delhi
06-02-2020 Nitin Sharma Versus State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) High Court of Delhi
05-02-2020 Union of India & Another Versus Vinay Sharma & Others High Court of Delhi
04-02-2020 Shubhash Kumar Sharma Versus Harish Chander Rawal National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
03-02-2020 Puroshattam Sharma Versus Executive Engineer, Gwalior North M.P. Madhya Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Co. Ltd. & Another Madya Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Bhopal
03-02-2020 Axis Bank Limited V/S Ravindra Kumar Sharma and Others. Debts Recovery Tribunal Delhi
30-01-2020 Veena Rani & Others Versus Purshottam Dass Sharma & Others High Court of Delhi
29-01-2020 Shivam Sharma Versus Union of India & Others High Court of Punjab and Haryana
27-01-2020 M/s. CNA Exports (P) Ltd. Versus Mansi Sharma & Others High Court of Delhi
27-01-2020 Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd., Mullanpur & Another Versus Sheshpal Sharma & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
23-01-2020 Bajrang Lal Sharma Versus C.K. Mathew & Others Supreme Court of India
22-01-2020 Deepak Sharma Versus Jabalpur Development Authority & Another High Court of Madhya Pradesh
22-01-2020 M/s United India Insurance Company Limited, Tadepallygudem Versus V. Narahari Sharma & Another High Court of for the State of Telangana
16-01-2020 Rajasthan State Road Transport Corp. Managing Director & Another Versus Ramesh Kumar Sharma Supreme Court of India
15-01-2020 New Delhi Municipal Council Versus Vijay Kumar Sharma High Court of Delhi
14-01-2020 Sonia Sharma Versus State of Jammu & Kashmir & Others High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
14-01-2020 Vinay Sharma Versus The State of N.C.T. of Delhi Supreme Court of India
10-01-2020 Goutam Buddha Agrawal Versus Satyanarayan Sharma & Others High Court of Chhattisgarh
08-01-2020 Badri Narayan Sharma V/S Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax, Jaipur Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
08-01-2020 Badri Narayan Sharma Versus Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax, Jaipur Customs Excise amp Service Tax Appellate Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
07-01-2020 J.S. Sharma & Sons Versus Shiv Devi Meena High Court of Delhi
02-01-2020 Mithun Kumar Sharma Versus Mamta Sharma High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench
23-12-2019 BPTP Ltd., Through its Managing Director, New Delhi Versus Pradeep Sharma & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
19-12-2019 Indrakumar Sharma Versus The State of Karnataka, Represented by State Public Prosecutor High Court of Karnataka
18-12-2019 Ambika Jain & Others Versus Ram Prakash Sharma & Others High Court of Delhi
17-12-2019 Raj Kumari & Others Versus Surinder Pal Sharma Supreme Court of India
16-12-2019 Savita Sharma & Others Versus Master Abeer Singh & Others High Court of Himachal Pradesh
16-12-2019 Abhey Kumar Sharma & Another Versus Ansal Hi-Tech Townships Ltd. Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission New Delhi
13-12-2019 M/s. State Bank of Mysore, (Now State Bank of India), Sharad Sharma, (Retd.) Managing Director & Others Versus P. Mukundan & Others High Court of Karnataka
13-12-2019 Vishnu Kant Sharma Versus Chief Election Commissioner & Others High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwailor
09-12-2019 Bharati Sharma Versus The State & Others High Court of Delhi
09-12-2019 State of H.P. & Another Versus P. C. Sharma High Court of Himachal Pradesh