w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Limited (Pantaloons Division) (Formerly known as Pantaloons Fashions and Retail Limited), Rep. By its General Manager-Legal & Compliance v/s M/s. Prashanth Properties Private Limited, Rep.by its Managing Director, Joseph Prem Raja & Another


Company & Directors' Information:- MORE RETAIL LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65990MH1988PLC048117

Company & Directors' Information:- ADITYA BIRLA FASHION AND RETAIL LIMITED [Active] CIN = L18101MH2007PLC233901

Company & Directors' Information:- BIRLA CORPORATION LIMITED [Active] CIN = L01132WB1919PLC003334

Company & Directors' Information:- ADITYA PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1986PTC026071

Company & Directors' Information:- V - RETAIL PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U52300TG2009PTC063445

Company & Directors' Information:- PRASHANTH PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74140PY2009PTC002320

Company & Directors' Information:- REP CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U26921TN2005PTC055138

Company & Directors' Information:- ADITYA LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45400DL2012PLC231460

Company & Directors' Information:- A.T. PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Converted to LLP] CIN = U45201DL2003PTC121997

Company & Directors' Information:- RAJA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U99999DL1997PTC084258

Company & Directors' Information:- L R PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U67120WB1995PTC073225

Company & Directors' Information:- J P PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U70101WB2004PTC100754

Company & Directors' Information:- A D PROPERTIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U70109WB1996PTC080715

Company & Directors' Information:- ADITYA FASHIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17119GJ1993PTC020857

Company & Directors' Information:- BIRLA PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U70100MH1996PTC104774

Company & Directors' Information:- ADITYA AND COMPANY (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U27107RJ2004PTC019073

Company & Directors' Information:- M D FASHION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74994MH2006PTC158814

Company & Directors' Information:- GENERAL PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45202MH1995PTC085779

Company & Directors' Information:- G M PROPERTIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U70101WB1986PTC040953

Company & Directors' Information:- P AND P PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U45201GJ1987PTC009915

Company & Directors' Information:- B. F. FASHIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51109MH2010PTC203672

Company & Directors' Information:- PREM AND COMPANY PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U15143PB1990PTC010175

Company & Directors' Information:- JOSEPH AND CO PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U01211KL1954PTC000507

Company & Directors' Information:- F K PROPERTIES PVT LTD [Active] CIN = U70101WB1971PTC027967

Company & Directors' Information:- PREM PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U70101PB1995PTC016769

Company & Directors' Information:- R. L. PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U70101WB2007PTC119672

Company & Directors' Information:- RAJA PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U45201WB1996PTC081852

Company & Directors' Information:- K N PROPERTIES PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U45203WB1981PTC033390

Company & Directors' Information:- A & B FASHIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U17126DL1973PTC148252

Company & Directors' Information:- P P FASHIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51312DL2004PTC125694

Company & Directors' Information:- G M FASHIONS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED. [Strike Off] CIN = U17120DL1989PTC038309

Company & Directors' Information:- R PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U70101OR2009PTC011302

Company & Directors' Information:- FASHION PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U70101TN2008PTC066000

Company & Directors' Information:- AT FASHIONS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U18202DL2013PTC262670

Company & Directors' Information:- RAJA FASHION PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74994DL2007PTC158486

Company & Directors' Information:- G FASHION PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U17120DL2007PTC164098

    C.R.P. PD No. 339 of 2017 & C.M.P.Nos. 1541 & 1542 of 2017

    Decided On, 08 June 2017

    At, High Court of Judicature at Madras

    By, THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE V.M. VELUMANI

    For the Petitioner: Kamalakumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: V. Raghavachari for K.S. Karthik Raja, Advocates.



Judgment Text

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order dated 06.01.2017 in I.A. No.2179 of 2016 in O.S.No.193 of 2016 on the file of the Principal District Judge at Pondicherry.)

This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 06.01.2017 in I.A. No.2179 of 2016 in O.S.No.193 of 2016 on the file of the Principal District Judge at Pondicherry.

2. The petitioner is the plaintiff and the respondents are the defendants in O.S.No.193 of 2016 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Pondicherry. The petitioner filed suit for a direction to the first respondent to receive the balance refundable security deposit amount of Rs.10,00,000/- and come forward to execute the lease deed after complying with his obligations under the agreement to lease dated 02.03.2015 and declaring the sub-lease deed dated 05.12.2016 executed by the first respondent in favour of the second respondent as null and void and not binding on the petitioner.

3. According to the petitioner, he has entered into an agreement for execution of lease with the first respondent agreeing to pay a sum of Rs.25,00,000/- as refundable security deposit. Accordingly, the petitioner had paid a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- and balance sum of Rs.10,00,000/- is payable in two instalments of Rs.5,00,000/- Lakhs each, upon completion of work by the first respondent and execution of lease deed respectively. The first respondent did not complete the work as agreed upon and completion of work was delayed. The first respondent was giving assurances that the work would be completed and lease agreement would be entered into with the petitioner. On 17.11.2016, the first respondent terminated the Agreement to Lease and refunded the security deposit. Immediately, the petitioner sent reply to the said letter and returned the cheque issued by the first respondent.

4. The petitioner filed Arbitration petition (L) No.1290 of 2016 on the file of High Court, Mumbai as per Arbitration Clause 46 of Agreement invoking the relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. On 08.12.2016, when the matter was listed, the learned counsel for the first respondent informed the court that he has no instruction with regard to creation of third party interest in the suit property. Based on the said submission, sole Arbitrator was appointed by the court on 09.12.2016. On 09.12.2016, the learned counsel for the first respondent informed the learned counsel for the petitioner and arbitrator that property was handed over to the second respondent on 02.11.2016 and a sub-lease agreement was registered on 06.12.2016. A copy of the lease deed was produced before the High Court, Mumbai on 16.12.2016 and the High Court, Mumbai closed the Arbitration petition with a direction to the petitioner to seek remedy before the appropriate Civil Court. In the said circumstances, the petitioner has filed the above suit for specific performance of agreement to lease dated 02.03.2015 directing the first respondent to receive the balance refundable security deposit amount of Rs.10,00,000/- and come forward to execute the lease deed after complying with his obligations under the agreement to lease dated 02.03.2015 and declaring the sub-lease deed dated 05.12.2016 executed by the first respondent in favour of the second respondent as null and void and not binding on the petitioner.

5. Alongwith the suit, the petitioner filed I.A.No.2179 of 2016 for interim injunction restraining the second respondent and anyone claiming through them from entering into the petition schedule property and from carrying on any activities including fit out or altering the physical features in furtherance of the lease deed dated 05.12.2016 till the final disposal of the suit. On 20.12.2016, an exparte injunction order was granted. The petitioner complied with Order 39 Rule 3 (a) of CPC and filed an affidavit to that effect on 21.12.2016. On 03.01.2017, when the I.A. was posted for hearing, the second respondent filed counter to I.A.No.2179 of 2016 and an affidavit stating that the petitioner has not complied with Order 39 Rule 3 (a) of CPC. The application was adjourned to 06.01.2017 and after elaborate arguments, the learned Judge passed an order adjourning I.A.No.2179 of 2016 for enquiry to 18.01.2017 and did not extend the interim order already granted.

6. Against the order dated 06.01.2017 in I.A. No.2179 of 2016 in O.S.No.193 of 2016, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed.

7. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the interim order was not extended only based on the contention of the second respondent that petitioner has not complied with Order 39 Rule 3(a) CPC. The second respondent has not substantiated his contention that he has not received the document and the learned Judge erred in not extending the interim injunction. The learned Judge failed to consider the document relied on by the petitioner and arguments to prove that the second respondent is not a bonafide leasee. The learned Judge having held that injunction application can be finally decided only after considering the oral evidence, erred in not extending the interim injunction. The learned Judge has not given any reason for not extending the interim injunction.

8. The learned counsel for the petitioner relied on the following judgments in support of his contention -

(1) 2001 (3) CTC 486 [R.Karuppan v. P.K.Rajagopal]

(2) AIR 2013 (KAR) 142 [ R.K.Jain v. P.G.Chacko]

(3) Order of Delhi High Court dated 10.01.2014 in CS (OS) 2252/2011 & connected I.As

9. Per contra, learned counsel for the second respondent submitted that the present Civil Revision Petition is not maintainable as impugned order is appealable under Order XLIII Rule (1) (r) CPC. He would further submit that the possession of the suit property was entrusted to the second respondent by the first respondent on 02.11.2016 and sub-lease agreement was registered on 06.12.2016. The second respondent carried major portion of the work in the petition premises and has already issued purchase order to the tune of Rs.1,56,74,394/-. The fact that the second respondent is in possession of the petition premises was admitted by the petitioner before the High Court, Mumbai and High Court, Mumbai held that the second respondent will not in equity claim in respect of the work done by him from 29.12.2016. It is not correct to state that the learned Judge did not extend the interim order on the ground that the petitioner has not complied with mandatory provisions of Order 39 Rule 3 (a) CPC. The learned Judge has not passed any final order and has only adjourned the application for final disposal to 18.01.2017 on the ground that the application can be decided on merits only based on the oral evidence let in by the parties.

10. The learned counsel for the second respondent relied on the following document in support of his contention -

(1) 2007 SCC 695 [A.Venkatasubbiah Naidu v. S.Chellappan & Ors.]

(2) 2011 (8) SCC 249 [Ramrameshwari Devi & Ors. v. Nirmala Devi & Ors.]

(3) 2007 (7) SCC 125 Adhunik Steels Ltd. v. Orissa Manganese & Minerals (P) Ltd.]

(4) 2007 (1) CTC 668 [Salem Vivekananda English Institute v. Vivekananda Kalvi Nilayam Pvt. Ltd.]

(5) AIR 1988 MAD 162 [The Special Tahsildar v. V.Rangasamy Reddiar]

(6) 2013 (15) SCC 27 [I.S.Sikandar (dead) by Lrs v. K.Subramani & Ors.]

11. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, respondents and perused the materials available on record.

12. A reading of the impugned order reveals that the learned Judge has not extended the interim order already granted not based on the contention of the second respondent that the petitioner has failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of Order 39 Rule 3 (a) of CPC. The learned Judge did not extend the interim order in view of the rival contention which can be decided only by appreciating the oral evidence to be let in by the parties in the Interlocutory Application.

13. From the above facts of the case mentioned by the petitioner in this Civil Revision Petition, it is seen that the learned counsel for the first respondent who appeared in Arbitration Petition before the High Court, Mumbai has informed that the second respondent was put in possession of the schedule mentioned property on 02.11.2016 and sub-lease agreement was registered on 06.12.2016. It is also seen that the learned counsel for the first respondent produced the sub-lease agreement before the High Court, Mumbai on 16.12.2016 and based on the same, the Arbitration Petition was closed with a direction to seek appropriate remedy before the appropriate Civil Court.

14. The second respondent in the present Interlocutory Application has stated that he is in possession of the petition pr

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

emises and has carried out 75% of entire work and has also placed purchase order to the tune of Rs.1,56,74,394/-. Considering the said submissions, the learned Judge has held that these rival contentions cannot be decided in a summary manner and it is just and necessary to conduct a full enquiry by examining the parties to arrive at a decision. 15. In view of the above reasons, the relevant portions of the judgments relied on by the learned counsel for both the parties are not extracted. 16. In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 17. From the records, it is seen that exparte order of injunction was originally granted and subsequently interim injunction was not extended. In view of the same, the learned Judge is directed to dispose of the I.A., as expeditiously as possible, in any event, not later than two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

25-06-2020 Sunil @ Sunil Ashok Gadivaddar Versus State of Karnataka, Rep. by SPP, Bengaluru High Court of Karnataka
25-06-2020 M/s. Goodwill Leather Art Rep By its Prop Md Quddus ALi Alias Md Quddus Ali Molla Versus National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
24-06-2020 Maruthi @ Polard Versus The State of Karnataka, Rep. by State Public Prosecutor, Bengaluru High Court of Karnataka
24-06-2020 V. Vasantha Versus The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by its Chief Secretary to the Government, Personnel & Administrative Reforms (S) Department, Secretariat, Chennai & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
23-06-2020 M/s. Acme Trade And Agencies, ASSAM Versus Union of India Rep. By The Secy. to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Finance, Deptt. of Revenue, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
23-06-2020 Rohini Gogoi (Under Suspension) Versus State of Assam Rep. by the Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Public Health Engineering Deptt. High Court of Gauhati
23-06-2020 Swetha Shri Selvakumar Versus Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
23-06-2020 Tanveer Ahmed Versus State Women Police Station, Rep. State Public Prosecutor, Bangalore High Court of Karnataka
23-06-2020 The State rep.by. Assistant Commissioner of Police, Central Crime Branch, Chennai Versus R.S. Bharathi & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
22-06-2020 B. Ramamoorthy & Another Versus The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Legislative Assembly Secretariat, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
22-06-2020 A. Devaraj Versus The State of Tamilnadu, rep. By its Chief Secretary to the Government, Personnel & Administrative Reforms (S) Department, Secretariat, Chennai & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
19-06-2020 Chandra Marbles Mattannur, Rep By Its Properties C.M. Jeeja Versus C.H. Ramachandran & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
19-06-2020 Maria Lijose Kumar & Others Versus The State, Rep by The Inspector of Police, CBCID-HQRS, Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-06-2020 Prakasha Versus State of Karnataka, Rep. by State Public Prosecutor, Bangalore & Another High Court of Karnataka
18-06-2020 N. Krishnamoorthy Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Rural Development & Panchayat Raj Department, Chennai & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
18-06-2020 Ravi Parameswara Raja Versus State of Kerala, Represented by Chief Secretary, Secretariat Thiruvananthapuram & Others High Court of Kerala
16-06-2020 M. Nagalakshmi Versus Union of India, rep., by its Secretary, Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of India High Court of for the State of Telangana
15-06-2020 Aditya Nath Jha Versus Union of India & Others Supreme Court of India
12-06-2020 Md Kameual Islam & Others Versus The State, rep.by the Inspector of Police, Dindigul Town South Police Station, Dindigul & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
12-06-2020 M.V. Ramani Versus The Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
12-06-2020 The New India Assurance Company Limited, Rep. by its Branch Manager, Punnam Chander complex, Chowrastha, Hanmkonda, Warangal Versus Sangeraboina Uppalaiah & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
11-06-2020 G. Gnaneshwar Versus The State of A.P., rep. by Spl. Public Prosecutor for ACB, Hyderabad High Court of for the State of Telangana
11-06-2020 J. Antony Jayakumar Versus The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Department of Home (Prison IV), Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
10-06-2020 Umesh Gupta Versus PB Retail Private Limited High Court of Delhi
09-06-2020 State rep. by the Drugs Inspector, O/o. Director of Drugs Control, Tamil Nadu, Chennai Versus M/s. National Pharmaceuticals [A-3], A Division of Rider Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by Kamalchand Jain, Director & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
08-06-2020 Raja Sonkar Versus State of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh
08-06-2020 Sethupathi Ramalingam & Another Versus State rep. by the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Sooramangalam & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
05-06-2020 Rajeswari Versus The state rep by the Inspector of Police, Kariyapattinam Police Station, Nagapattinam High Court of Judicature at Madras
05-06-2020 The Salem District Lorry Owners Association rep.by its President V. Chennakesavan Versus The Inspector of Factories, Salem & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-06-2020 Jeyachandran Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Public (Foreigners.I) Department, Secretariat, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-06-2020 Sakthivel Versus State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Inspector of Police, Neyveli Thermal Police Station, Neyveli T.S. High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-06-2020 M. Parthasarathi & Another Versus The State Level Scrutiny Committee rep. by its Chairman Adi Dravidar & Tribal Welfare Department & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-06-2020 Nisar Versus State of Kerala, Rep. by Director General of Prosecution, High Court of, Kerala, Ernakulam High Court of Kerala
04-06-2020 Chennai Garrtech Ltd., Rep. By its Director, L.S. Abinesha Babu Versus Inspector General of Registration, Santhome & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
03-06-2020 Somasundaram @ Somu Versus The State Rep. By The Deputy Commissioner of Police Supreme Court of India
03-06-2020 P. Venkatasubramani & Another Versus Tamil Nadu Generation & Distribution Corporation Ltd., Rep. by its Chairman cum Managing Director, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
03-06-2020 Merugu Narsaiah @ Narsimha Reddy & Others Versus The State of Telangana rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department (Land Acquisition), Hyderabad & Others High Court of for the State of Telangana
03-06-2020 V. Saravanan Versus Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited, Rep. by the Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited, Kumbakonam & Another Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
03-06-2020 Tamilnadu Muslim Munnetra Kazhagam (TMMK), Rep. by its Chairman Prof. M.H. Jawahirullah Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Chief Secretary, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
03-06-2020 PUEBLO HOLDINGS LIMITED, Rep. by its authorised signatory Siddhesh Sham Kshirsagar Versus EMIRATES TRADING AGENCY LLC, A company incorporated under the appropriate laws of the United Arab Emirates having its registered office and/or business address at ETA Star House, United Arab Emirates & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
02-06-2020 Dr. A.K. Sheik Manzoor Versus State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
02-06-2020 Indian Overseas Bank Officers' Association, Reg No: 321/MDS, Rep by its Joint General Secretary, R. Muthukumar Versus Union of India, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
02-06-2020 A. Janakiraman Versus The Railway Employees Co-operative Credit Society Limited, rep. by its Chief Executive, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
02-06-2020 Kalamani Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the District Collector of Vellore District & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
02-06-2020 Citizens Legal Right Association, Rep. by Its President, Joshy Kalluveettil & Another Versus Union of India, Through Its Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi & Others High Court of Kerala
02-06-2020 Subramani Versus State rep. by the Inspector of Police, Krishnagiri District High Court of Judicature at Madras
02-06-2020 Balraj Versus State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by the Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Chennai & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
01-06-2020 Birin Spinning Mills Limited, Rep its Director D. Rangaswamy & Others Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Secretary to Government Commercial Taxes Department, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-06-2020 Aditya Birla Money Limited, Rep. By its Head – Legal & Compliance, L.R. Murali Krishnan Versus The National Stock Exchange of India Limited, Investors Services Cell, Kotturpuram & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-06-2020 K. Shanthi Versus The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Secretary, Housing and Urban Development Department, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
01-06-2020 Nagen Chandra Das & Others Versus The State of Assam, Rep. by the Comm. And Secy., Deptt. of Urban Development Deptt., Dispur & Others High Court of Gauhati
01-06-2020 State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai Versus A. Mathiyalagan Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
01-06-2020 Padmavani Educational & Charitable Trust, Rep.by its Joint Managing Trustee, Salem Versus The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep.its Secretary, Housing & Urban Development Department, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
29-05-2020 Vazeer Khan & Others Versus The State of Karnataka, Rep. by State Public Prosecutor, Bangalore High Court of Karnataka
29-05-2020 Vijay Ganesh @ Vijay @ Kurangu Vijay Versus State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Principal Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise (IX) Department & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
29-05-2020 Joe Joseph Versus The State of Kerala, Represented by The Principal Secretary To Government, Higher Education Department, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram & Others High Court of Kerala
29-05-2020 Rihan & Another Versus State of Karnataka, Rep. by State Public Prosecutor, Bangalore High Court of Karnataka
29-05-2020 Ameen Shariff @ Jabber Shariff Versus State by Sadshiva Nagara PS, Rep. by State Public Prosecutor, Bengaluru High Court of Karnataka
29-05-2020 Jayaramappa & Others Versus State by Sulibele Police Station, Rep by SPP & Another High Court of Karnataka
28-05-2020 Sharathkumar & Others Versus The State of Karnataka, Rep. by its Government Pleader, Bengaluru High Court of Karnataka
27-05-2020 Vijaykumar Versus The State of Karnataka, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, Bengaluru High Court of Karnataka
27-05-2020 M. Kalidasan & Others Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Principal Secretary to Government, Highways and Minor Ports Department, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-05-2020 M/s. Gemini Circus, Dadar T.T., Mumbai, Rep. by its Partner Ajay Shankar Versus M/s. Great Gemini Circus, KDA Colony, Kanpur High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-05-2020 Union of India, Rep. by the Secretary, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying & Fisheries, Government of India, New Delhi & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-05-2020 S. Arundath Versus Karnataka Lokayuktha Police, Rep. by Inspector of Police High Court of Karnataka
27-05-2020 Prof. Dr. M. Ramadas, Former Member of Parliament (Lok Sabha), Honorary President, Karaikal District Fisherman Reservation Committee, Karaikal Versus Government of Puducherry, Rep. by Chief Secretary, Chief Secretariat, Puducherry & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
26-05-2020 R. Kannan Versus State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by the Secretary to Government, Commercial Taxes and Religious Endowment Department, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
26-05-2020 M/s. Mulberry Silks Limited (formerly M/s. Shakashambana Silks Exports (P) Ltd.), 'Mulberry House', Rep.by its Director R.K. Bothra Versus Settlement Commission (IT & WT), Additional Bench, Ministry of Finance, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
26-05-2020 Thangarajar Mills Pvt.Limited, Unit III, Rep., by its Manager (Administration) & Another Versus The Tamil Nadu Generation & Distribution Corporation Ltd., (TANGEDCO), Rep., by its Chairman & Managing Director, Chennai & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
26-05-2020 M. Thirumoorthi Versus The State rep by Sub-Inspector of Police, Coimbatore Railway Police, Coimbatore High Court of Judicature at Madras
25-05-2020 Mujeeb Rahman Versus State of Kerala, Rep. by the Circle Inspector of Police, Nilambur, Through The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam High Court of Kerala
22-05-2020 Suryadevara Venkata Rao Versus State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh & Others High Court of Andhra Pradesh
22-05-2020 Gowrmma @ Latha Versus State of Karnataka, by Kengeri Police Station, Rep. by HCGP, Bengaluru High Court of Karnataka
21-05-2020 Groom India Salon and SPA Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Authorised Signatory, Chennai Versus The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner II, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
21-05-2020 Boya Kajje Pedda Ambaraju & Others Versus State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad & Another High Court of Andhra Pradesh
21-05-2020 Prem Singh Versus State of Himachal Pradesh High Court of Himachal Pradesh
21-05-2020 Mohammed Mujeeb Versus State by Electronic City Ps, Rep. by State Public Prosecutor High Court of Karnataka
20-05-2020 Ravish Versus State of Karnataka, Rep. by State Public Prosecutor High Court of Karnataka
20-05-2020 Muhammed Koya & Others Versus State of Kerala, Rep. by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBCID, CFS, Ernakulam, (Cr.No. 269 of 1998 of Pala Police, Station), Through The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam & Another High Court of Kerala
20-05-2020 Omgiri Versus The State Through Yadrami Police Station, Rep. by Add. SPP High Court & Another High Court of Karnataka
19-05-2020 M/s. Krishna Timber & Plywood Versus State of Tamilnadu, rep. By its Principal Secretary to Government, Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, CT & Re Department & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-05-2020 Jai Shiva Mahadeva Versus State of Karnataka, Rep. by SPP, High Court Building, Bangalore High Court of Karnataka
19-05-2020 Travancore Devaswom Board, Rep. by Its Secretary Versus The Deputy Examiner, Local Fund Audit, Thiruvananthapuram & Others High Court of Kerala
19-05-2020 M/s. Dekshinamoorthi & Co., rep. by its Partner, D. Govindarajan Versus The Commercial Tax Officer & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-05-2020 M/s. Seshasayee Paper and Boards Limited, Rep. by its Director (Finance) & Secretary, V. Pichai Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income- tax, Circle I (1) High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-05-2020 M/s. Seshasayee Paper & Boards Limited, Rep. by its Director (Finance) & Secretary, V. Pichai Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income- tax, Circle I (1) High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-05-2020 Baglekar Akash Kumar Versus State of Karnataka, Rep. by its Chief Secretary & Others High Court of Karnataka
19-05-2020 Muthumani Gunaraj Versus State rep. by the Inspector of Police, Special Police Establishment, Central Bureau of Investigation Anticorruption Branch, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-05-2020 The Director, Jubilee Mission Medical College & Research Institute, Trichur & Others Versus The State of Kerala, Rep. by The Secretary To Health & Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram & Others High Court of Kerala
18-05-2020 RM. Swamy Versus Government of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
15-05-2020 M. Ramasamy Versus State Bank of India, Rep. by its Chief General Manager (Appellate Authority), Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
15-05-2020 K. Mohammed Amarudeen Versus The State rep. by the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Ramanathapuram & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
15-05-2020 M.R. Bhat & Others Versus India Awake for Transparency, Rep. by P. Sadanand Goud & Others High Court of Karnataka
13-05-2020 Anil Kumar @ Anil Versus State by Kodigehalli Police Station, Rep. by its Station House Officer High Court of Karnataka
12-05-2020 Anburaj Versus State rep. by the Inspector of Police, Tiruvarur Town Police Station, Tiruvarur High Court of Judicature at Madras
12-05-2020 Sheik Madhar Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Principal Secretary to the Government, Home Prohibition & Exercise Department, Chennai & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
12-05-2020 Vairavamurthy Versus The State rep. By the Inspector of Police, Voimedu Police Station, Vedaranyam Taluk, Nagapattinam High Court of Judicature at Madras
11-05-2020 Pallapu Jangaiah, R.R. District & Another Versus The State of A.P., rep. by PP., High Court High Court of for the State of Telangana
08-05-2020 The Management of M/s. Recipharm Pharma Services Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by Assistant General Manager Versus G. Vasanthkumr & Others High Court of Karnataka
08-05-2020 V. Srinivas Chowdary & Others Versus State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Department of Panchayat Raj & Rural Development, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati & Others High Court of Andhra Pradesh


LawyerServices is a Premium Legal Tech solution.


Lawyers, Law Firms, Government Departments and Corporates rely on us for, Workflow Automation, Data Aggregation, Timely Updates, Case Management, Intelligent Research, Latest Legal Data Updates and a LOT more!

If you are a legal professional, CONTACT US, in order to see how our UNIQUE solution can benefit your organization.

Features Intro Close Box