w w w . L a w y e r S e r v i c e s . i n



A.J. Ramadoss v/s S. Padmavathy and N. Sankar(spouse) Om Siva Sakthi Garments


Company & Directors' Information:- D R GARMENTS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101GJ2005PTC046010

Company & Directors' Information:- R. R. GARMENTS LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51900MH1995PLC095544

Company & Directors' Information:- S G GARMENTS LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101WB2004PLC098193

Company & Directors' Information:- K K P GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U65921TZ1994PTC005334

Company & Directors' Information:- B K GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2001PTC109850

Company & Directors' Information:- OM GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U18101KA1993PTC014454

Company & Directors' Information:- N K GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2000PTC107093

Company & Directors' Information:- K. D. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18109WB2005PTC101896

Company & Directors' Information:- G AND A GARMENTS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U18101PB1995PTC016121

Company & Directors' Information:- V H GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U52322MH2008PTC181066

Company & Directors' Information:- S. S. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL1996PTC083315

Company & Directors' Information:- G. M. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18109DL2006PTC152683

Company & Directors' Information:- D AND D GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL1975PTC007923

Company & Directors' Information:- J S GARMENTS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74900WB2009PTC135262

Company & Directors' Information:- K. B . GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18109WB2011PTC166954

Company & Directors' Information:- A K GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17120DL2015PTC282847

Company & Directors' Information:- D P GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U18101DL2004PTC129479

Company & Directors' Information:- V S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC143084

Company & Directors' Information:- P AND P GARMENTS PVT LTD [Under Process of Striking Off] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC143556

Company & Directors' Information:- V S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101HR2005PTC068124

Company & Directors' Information:- L. H. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U17121KA2011PTC060761

Company & Directors' Information:- K R GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U17111WB1998PTC087046

Company & Directors' Information:- T & A GARMENTS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U52321TN1993PTC025318

Company & Directors' Information:- P. S. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18204DL2007PTC164238

Company & Directors' Information:- S. A. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17121DL2007PTC165007

Company & Directors' Information:- T S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51494DL1996PTC076668

Company & Directors' Information:- GARMENTS INDIA PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U51909GJ1979PTC003310

Company & Directors' Information:- K. S. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2007PTC164404

Company & Directors' Information:- B G GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U74899DL2005PTC142488

Company & Directors' Information:- S P GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U18101DL2003PTC120709

Company & Directors' Information:- P N GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51311DL2004PTC127524

Company & Directors' Information:- AJ GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18109DL2010PTC201745

Company & Directors' Information:- S T GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18109DL2015PTC277043

Company & Directors' Information:- P L GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17120DL2013PTC248417

Company & Directors' Information:- M. K. GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17291DL2007PTC164395

Company & Directors' Information:- R A GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Converted to LLP and Dissolved] CIN = U18101DL2003PTC123385

Company & Directors' Information:- C S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC134787

Company & Directors' Information:- B L GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC136912

Company & Directors' Information:- B D S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC137898

Company & Directors' Information:- T G GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U18101DL2005PTC143392

Company & Directors' Information:- G P S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED. [Active] CIN = U18101DL2006PTC149330

Company & Directors' Information:- G P GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U18101DL2007PTC161067

Company & Directors' Information:- I B GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51909DL2013PTC257044

Company & Directors' Information:- G P S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED. [Active] CIN = U74110DL2006PTC149330

Company & Directors' Information:- A G GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U51300DL2013PTC257609

Company & Directors' Information:- V R V GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51311DL2008PTC182256

Company & Directors' Information:- M V GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U74899HR2005PTC141797

Company & Directors' Information:- A AND R GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U17120HR2013PTC049037

Company & Directors' Information:- V K GARMENTS PRIVATE LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U18101DL1981PTC012410

Company & Directors' Information:- A S GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Active] CIN = U17212CH1992PTC012350

Company & Directors' Information:- V R GARMENTS PVT LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U18101CH1991PTC011345

Company & Directors' Information:- S B GARMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED [Strike Off] CIN = U51311DL2005PTC141954

Company & Directors' Information:- SAKTHI CORPORATION PVT. LTD [Strike Off] CIN = U99999TN1960PTC004063

    Revision Petition No. 1053 of 2012

    Decided On, 09 April 2013

    At, National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

    By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA
    By, PRESIDING MEMBER & THE HONOURABLE MRS. REKHA GUPTA
    By, MEMBER

    For the Petitioner: O.A. Varadadesigan, Authorized Representative. For the Respondent: -------



Judgment Text

Rekha Gupta, Member

Revision petition no. 1053 of 2012 has been filed against the order dated 12.1.2012 in First Appeal No.805/2010 passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chennai Bench-II (‘State Commission’) in C.C.No.327/2009 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Chennai (North) Mylapore, Chennai(‘District Forum’).

2. Facts of the case as given by the complainant are as follows;

'The opposite parties moved the Complainant’s father, A.R. Janardhanam a retired railway official, for help in marketing the manufactured garments for export. Since, the opposite parties were very much in need of logistic support and the father of the Complainant was interested in engaging his complainant’s son in some technological service for which he is best fitted in providing printing services on garments to make a sub-oriented service. In order to ensure service association mutually that the Complainant could utilize his technology with the opposite parties who assured supply of garments if logistical support were forthcoming by way of fabrics and sewing machines. The opposite parties demanded and obtained the wherewithal for obtaining logistic services and financial support. The opposite party executed documents (copy enclosed) to this effect, but failed to keep up the promise to supply garments for printing and clearly diverting the money into Real Estate and match making business.

The opposite parties originally proposed to hire twenty machines including ancillaries to promote the business. The husband partner has drained and deserted the lady, then the lady opposite party desired and obtained on her own name a third installment for the fulfillment of service project and the complainant also faithfully believed in the shaping of the proposed garment export project but she diverting the funds on some other ways and the means that she ultimately disappointed the complainant with non supply of promised garments for printing purposes.

Having thus invested in a dream project, the Complainant has incurred a loss of Rs.50,000/- by the disappointment of promised services by the opposite party.

3. District Forum in its order stated that;

'Even though served to the opposite party he was called absent and he was set ex-parte'.

4. District Forum also noted that;

'Aperusal of Ex.A2 would go to show that the so called documents executed with the respondents were only copies of three promissory notes alleged to have been executed by the respondents on 24.7.2006, 25.7.2006 and 2.3.2007. These 3 promissory notes have been produced by the complainant to show that the complainant has availed the service of the opposite party for consideration and there is deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party. The perusal of Ex.A2 series would go to show that the opposite party have borrowed a total amount of Rs.30,000/-form the complainant on three occasions. If at all the complainant has not able to collect the money he had to approach the competent civil court to get at the money. By getting executed 3 promissory notes which could not be terms as agreement. It will not create a Consumer and trader relationship between the complainant and opposite party and complainant could not be termed as consumer for the simple reason he obtained three promissory notes from the opposite party. As such this Forum come to the conclusion that this complaint itself is not maintainable as per the provision of Consumer Protection Act. Since the complainant cannot be brought under the purview of the definition of Consumer under section 2 (d) of the Consumer Protection Act. As such this Forum come to the conclusion that the complainant has miserably failed to prove any deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party and hence this point is answered in favour of the opposite party as against the complainant.

7. Point No.: 2

As we have decided in point No.1 that the complainant himself will not come under the purview of the definition Consumer as per Section 2 (d) of Consumer Protection Act. Then the complainant has miserably failed to prove the deficiency in service. As such the complaint has to be dismissed. The point is answered accordingly.

In the result, the complaint is dismissed. Since the opposite party has not appeared there is no order as to costs'.

5. Aggrieved by the order the petitioner filed an appeal in the State Commission. State Commission noted as follows ;

'5. It is pertinent to note that the complainant has not filed any proof affidavit to substantiatehis contentions and instead the complainant’s father alone has filed proof affidavit and in the proof affidavit, the averment is that the opposite party availed loan executing receipts and the prayer in the affidavit is to direct the opposite party to repay the loan with interest and costs.

6. Ex. A2 series are copies of three demand promissory notes executed by the opposite party in favour of the complainant. There is absolutely no evidence on record to establish that the complainant had consumer relationship with the opposite party. On perusal of the complaint, the proof affidavit filed by his father and Ex.A2 series, it is clear that the complainant has advanced loan to the opposite party for interest on obtaining three promissory notes from the opposite party; and that it is purely a loan transaction which does not come under the purview of Consumer Protection Act. There is no proof affidavit filed by the complainant and even in the proof affidavit filed by his father nothing is mentioned about any consumer relationship between the complainant and the opposite party. It is pertinent to note that the relief sought in the complaint is to direct the opposite party to repay the loan amount with interest and costs. Therefore, obviously this complaint is filed before the District Forum abusing the process of law, instead of filing a suit before the Civil Court.

7. Therefore, the complaint is not maintainable under the Consumer Protection Act and accordingly the complaint is liable to be dismissed.

8. The District Forum has rightly dismissed the complain holding that the complaint is not maintainable under the Consumer Protection Act and that the question of deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party does not arise.

9. We agreewith the finding and decision of the District Forum, and accordingly the appeal is liable to be dismissed.

10. In the result, the appeal is dismissed confirming the order of the District Forum dismissing the complaint. No order as to costs in the appeal'.

6. Hence, this revision petition. 7. There are no specific grounds given in this revision petition.

8. We have heard the Authorized Representative of the petitioner, Sh.A. R. Janardhanam. He has failed to provide any document or evidence in support of his case and against the respondent.

9. It is an undisputed fact that the documents placed on record by the petitioner are only three promissory notes which would go to show that the respondent had borrowed total amount of Rs.30,000/-form the petitioner on three occasions. Three promissory notes cannot be termed as an agreement. Hence, same will not create Consumer and Trader relationship between the petitioner and the respondent. Hence, we feel that the State Commission rightly came to the conclusion that the complaint itself is not maintainable as per provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short, ‘Act’). The District Forum had also rightly come to the same conclusion. The petitioner has totally failed to prove that he is ‘Consumer’ as per Section 2(d) of the Act, as also to prove deficiency in service against the respondent .

10. Under section 21 (b) of the Act, this Commission can interfere with the order of the State Commission where such State Commission has exercised jurisdiction not vested in it by law, or has failed to exercise jurisdiction so vested, or has acted in the exercise of its jurisdiction illegally or with material irregularity.

11. I

Please Login To View The Full Judgment!

n view of the concurrent findings of facts given by the fora below, no jurisdiction or legal error has been shown to call for interference in the exercise of power under section 21 (b) of the Act. Both fora have given cogent reasons in their order which do not call for any interference nor do they suffer from any infirmity or revisional exercise of jurisdiction. 12. Thus, there is no merit in the present petition and same is accordingly dismissed with cost of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only). 13. Petitioner is directed to deposit the cost by way of demand draft in the name of ‘Consumer Welfare Fund’ as per Rule 10A of Consumer Protection Rules, 1987, within four weeks from today. In case, petitioner fails to deposit the cost within prescribed period, then he shall be liable to pay interest @ 9% p.a. till its realization. 14. List on 17th May, 2013 for compliance.
O R







Judgements of Similar Parties

17-07-2020 Sathiyaraj @ Sakthi Versus The Inspector of Police, Alvarthirunagari Police Station, Tuticorin District. Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
11-03-2020 M/s. Jaya Sakthi Leathers (P) Ltd., a Company constituted under Companies Act, Rep. by its Managing Director, M.P. Adimoolam Versus The Finance Secretary, Chief Secretariat, Pondicherry & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
29-01-2020 Tvl. Sakthi Sugars Limited, Coimbatore Versus State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Deputy Commissioner(CT) Coimbatore High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-01-2020 Union of India rep. By its Enforcement Officer Enforcement Directorate Chennai Versus M/s. Raiments & Garments International, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
08-01-2020 Tvl. Brahma Sakthi Tin Factory, Rep. By its Partner SVS Velkumar, Villupuram Versus The Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, rep. By its Secretary, City Civil Court Building, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
08-01-2020 M.C. Subramaniam Versus M/s. Sakthi Finance Limited, Represented by its General Manager S. Arumugam & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
07-01-2020 Tvl. Sakthi Sugars Limited, Coimbatore Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Deputy Commissioner(CT) Coimbatore High Court of Judicature at Madras
03-01-2020 M/s. Sakthi Finance Ltd., Coimbatore Versus The chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Coimbatore & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
03-01-2020 The General Manager, Aleppy Parcel Service, Alappuzha Versus Anil Kumar V., Managing Partner, Wetex Garments, Poovattuparamba, Kozhikode Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
22-11-2019 The Management Scotts Garments Limited, Trippur Versus The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Coimbatore & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
20-11-2019 Sakthi & Others V/S State Represented by The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
31-10-2019 Desiya Makkal Sakthi Katchi, Rep.by its President M.L. Ravi Versus Union of India, Rep.by Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
14-10-2019 M/s. PJS Knit Garments, Rep.by its Partner, P. Sugansaran & Another Versus The Authorised Officer, Bank of Baroda, Tirupur Main Branch, Tirupur High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-08-2019 M/s. Indo Skins Garments Private Limited, Represented by its Managing Director, N. Thiagarajan, Chennai Versus The Presiding Officer, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
24-07-2019 The Officer In Charge, Sub-Regional Provident Fund Office & Another Versus M/s Godavari Garments Limited Supreme Court of India
18-07-2019 Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, Represented by the Chief General Manger, Telecom (Tamilnadu Circle), Chennai & Others Versus M/s. Sakthi Engineering Constructions, Erode & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
28-05-2019 Devi Nava Sakthi Middle School rep.by its Manager & Correspondent M.S. Devi Nava Sakthi Versus The Director of Elementary Education DPI Campus, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
30-04-2019 Cella Space Limited (formerly known as Sree Sakthi Paper Mills Limited) Versus BSE Limited & Another SEBI Securities amp Exchange Board of India Securities Appellate Tribunal
23-04-2019 Sree Sakthi Charitable Trust Rep by its Chairman N. Dharmalingam, established & administerin, Coimbatore Versus The Member Secretary, All India Council for Technical Education, New Delhi & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
05-04-2019 The District Collector, Kanchipuram Versus M/s. Gupta Garments, Rep. by its Authorized Signatory Anil Gupta & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-04-2019 M/s. Ginni Garments & Another Versus M/s. Sethi Garments & Others High Court of Punjab and Haryana
04-04-2019 Ginni Garments and Others V/S Sethi Garments and Others. In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
13-03-2019 The Senior Divisional Mechanical Engineer, Southern Railway, Salem Division & Others Versus M/s. Premier Garments Processing, Rep. by its Proprietor Ibrahim Sha, Chennai High Court of Judicature at Madras
21-12-2018 Batra Garments Pvt. Ltd. Versus New India Assurance Co. Ltd. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
21-12-2018 Goodluck Garments Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & Cus., Surat-II High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
29-11-2018 M/s. Sakthi Finance Limited Versus Shanavas High Court of Kerala
22-11-2018 Om Sakthi Real Estate by Partners & Others Versus Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Kancheepuram Electricity Division Circle & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
02-11-2018 M/s. Siva Sakthi Enterprises, by its Sole Proprietor, G. Saralathan, Chennai Versus The Principal Secretary to Government Industries (MMB.2) Department, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
29-10-2018 R.M. Karuppannan Versus S. Sakthi High Court of Judicature at Madras
11-10-2018 M. Sakthi Sharmila Versus The Director General of Police, R.K. Salai, Mylapore, Chennai & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
24-09-2018 M/s. Premier Garments Processing, Rep. by its Proprietor, Ibrahim Sha, Chennai Versus The Divisional Railway Manager, Salem & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
24-07-2018 Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd., (Now ECGC Limited), Chennai & Another Versus Zoro Garments Private Ltd., Rep.by its Managing Director, N.F. Mogrella High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-07-2018 M/s. Rasathe Garments, Rep by its Partner, Virudhunagar Versus The Commercial Tax Officer-I, Virudhunagar High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-07-2018 Bord for Industrial & Financial Reconstruction (B.I.F.R.) Versus Coromandel Garments Ltd. & Others High Court of Judicature at Bombay
06-07-2018 Venkatachalam @ Sakthi Versus The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-05-2018 G. Sakthi Saravanan Versus S. Arun High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-04-2018 M/s. Sri Rengas Avitta Garments, Represented by its Partner, R. Rajaram & Another Versus R. Indira High Court of Judicature at Madras
04-04-2018 Kandukuri Garments Versus Inspector of Legal Metrology High Court of Karnataka
01-02-2018 Commissioner of Central Excise, M/s. Sakthi Sugars Ltd. Madurai Versus M/s. Sakthi Sugars Ltd. Commissioner of Central Excise, Madurai Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal South Zonal Bench At Chennai
02-01-2018 A. Velumurugan Versus M/s. Sree Shiva Sakthi Garments, Represented by its Partner Venkatachalam, Tiruppur High Court of Judicature at Madras
28-11-2017 K.C. Shaju Versus Manager, Sakthi Automobiles & Others Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
24-08-2017 Om Sakthi Versus The Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
11-08-2017 R. Anbukkarasan Versus M/s. Sakthi Trading Company Paghalpur Through its Agent United India Insurance Company & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
01-08-2017 The Principal Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai & Another Versus S.R. Trust rep. by its Trustee G. Sakthi Saravanan High Court of Judicature at Madras
26-07-2017 Creative Garments Pvt. Ltd V/S C.C.E. & S.T. Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal West Zonal Bench At Ahmedabad
03-04-2017 Palaniammal & Others Versus Sakthi Sugar Ltd., by its Managing Director, Erode & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
15-03-2017 Sakthi Ramakrishnan Versus State represented by The Inspector of Police High Court of Judicature at Madras
10-02-2017 The Management of Foundation Garments Pvt. Ltd. Represented by its Managing Director ?Divine Grace? Versus Government of Tamil Nadu Labour & Employment (A1) Department, Represented by its Principal Secretary High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-01-2017 R.K. Rajkumar Proprietor M/s. Koghima Garments Versus The Registrar Debts Recovery Tribunal - III Spencer Towers Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
19-01-2017 Sri Sakthi Transports, rep. By its Sole Proprietor, S. Mylswamy & Another Versus M/s. Canara Bank, Coimbatore District & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
17-01-2017 Kitex Garments Ltd., represented by its Managing Director-Sabu M. Jacob Versus State of Kerala, represented by Principal Secretary To Government, Taxes (H) Department & Another High Court of Kerala
13-01-2017 M/s. Sakthi Sugars Ltd. Versus Regulated Market Committee, Kendupatna High Court of Orissa
06-01-2017 Sakthi Educational Trust, Represented by its Chairman, Chennai Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-01-2017 M. Mahendran Versus The Principal, Sakthi Vinayagar Hindu Vidyalaya, Chidambara Nagar, Thoothukudi & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
02-01-2017 Sonal Garments V/S Commr. of Cus., Seaport (Import), Chennai Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal South Zonal Bench At Chennai
22-12-2016 G. Sakthi Ayyanar Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Chief Secretary, Chennai & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
02-12-2016 Dr. D.K. Palanisamy & Others Versus Chairman, Sakthi Hospital & Research Centre & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
14-11-2016 M/s. Shree Sakthi Modern Rice & Oil Mill, Partnership Firm, Rep. by its Partner, R. Chinnusamy, Mettupalayam, Erode Versus R.Kalaimani, S/o.T.H. Ramachandran, Proprietor, M.R.K. Rice Corporation, Coimbatore High Court of Judicature at Madras
14-11-2016 S. Padmavathi Versus G. Sakthi Saravanan & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
15-09-2016 M/s. Rasathe Garments Versus The Commercial Tax Officer-I (FAC) Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
02-09-2016 Carol Garments & Another Versus The Joint Director General of Foreign Trade, Coimbatore & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
22-08-2016 Sakthi Rajan @ Sakthi & Another Versus State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Kundrakudi Police Station, Sivagangai District & Another Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
22-07-2016 The Principal, Sakthi Vinayagar Hindu Vidhyalaya, Chidambra Nagar, Thoothukudi Versus M. Mahendran & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
13-07-2016 T. Sakthi Versus The Chairman, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Chennai & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-07-2016 Sakthi Versus Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
21-06-2016 M/s. Oxygen the Digital Shop, Pulimoottil Arcade, Kottayam & Another Versus Namadevan.L., Anna Garments & Others Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Thiruvananthapuram
11-03-2016 Thirumani & Others Versus Sakthi & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
12-02-2016 M/s. Anjal Garments Versus Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
05-02-2016 M/s. Sakthi Murugan Polymers, Tiruppur represented by its Partner, K.K. Murthy Versus The Registrar, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Coimbatore & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
22-12-2015 Sakthi Gopalakrishnan & Another Versus Mylathal & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
14-12-2015 K. Sakthi Nattudurai Versus The Chief Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation & Distribution Corporation Ltd., Chennai & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
24-08-2015 Provident Fund Commissioner Versus M/s. Bena Garments High Court of Judicature at Bombay
05-06-2015 M/s. Triven Garments Ltd., represented by its Managing Director & Others Versus State represented by the Sub-Inspector of Police & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-04-2015 R. Sakthi Versus The Director of Survey & Land Records & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
06-03-2015 G. Sakthi Saravanan Versus The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
04-03-2015 Sakthi Gas Agency, Rep., by its Partner & Others Versus Union of India, Rep., by its Secretary to Govt., of India & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-02-2015 SCM Garments (P.) Ltd. Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle-III, Coimbatore Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai
24-02-2015 Dr. P.K. Palanisamy, Retd Professor of English & Others Versus The Chairman, Sakthi Hospital & Research Centre & Others Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Chennai
19-12-2014 The Commissioner of Central Excise, Anaimedu, Salem Versus M/s. Sakthi Sugars Ltd. & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
18-12-2014 Nelly Garments Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India High Court of Gujarat At Ahmedabad
15-12-2014 M/s. Sakthi Arrkay Traders & Caterers Private Limited, rep. by its Managing Director S. Krishnan Versus The Food Safety Officer & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
27-11-2014 K. Sakthi Murugan Versus The Superintending Engineer, Operation & Maintenance & Another Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
27-11-2014 Ful Singh, Proprietor of Maha Sakthi Exports Versus The Commissioner of Customs (Seaport-Export), Chennai. High Court of Judicature at Madras
26-11-2014 Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-II Versus Ankit Garments Manufacturing Co. High Court of Delhi
07-11-2014 KMC Textiles & Garments, rep.by its Proprietor, Shaj Mohammed Versus The Chief Manager & Authorized Officer, Indian Bank, Trichy Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
24-10-2014 Board of Investment of Sri Lanka Versus Million Garments (PVT) Ltd. Supreme Court of Sri Lanka
28-08-2014 Sakthi Fashions, Manufacturers & Exporters of Fabrics and Garments, Represented by its Proprietrix Versus Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd, Represented by its General Manager Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Chennai
23-06-2014 M/s. Siva Sakthi Matriculation School, rep. by its Correspondent, Kanyakumari Versus The Director of Matriculation Schools, Chennai & Others Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
11-06-2014 National Insurance Company Ltd. Versus M/s. Ess Ell Garments Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Chandigarh
01-05-2014 Sri Priyaluckshmi Garments Represented by Mrs. G. Mahalakshmi, Partner & Others Versus The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Others National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
29-04-2014 Vijay Karlekar, Proprietor, M/s. New Keerthi Garments & Another Versus Karnataka State Financial Corporation & Another National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
25-04-2014 In Re Jagadamba Garments Marketing Pvt. Ltd. & Another High Court of Judicature at Calcutta
26-02-2014 M/s. Lakshya Garments through its Proprietor Versus National Insurance Company Limited National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
12-02-2014 Mayflower Sakthi Garden Owners' Association Versus State of Tamil Nadu & Others National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
25-11-2013 Minor Sakthi Subhash Minor rep. by his father Versus V.L. Narayanan Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court
06-11-2013 Sakthi Guest House, Rep. by its Proprietor M. Sathyanarayanan Versus Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, rep. by its Member-Secretary & Others High Court of Judicature at Madras
25-09-2013 The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Versus M/s. Anjali Silks & Garments High Court of Karnataka
06-09-2013 Sakthi Vadivel Versus The Divisional Manager Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Limited, Villupuram High Court of Judicature at Madras
03-07-2013 M. Sakthi Versus The Chairman, Pee Gee College of Arts & Sciences & Another High Court of Judicature at Madras
13-06-2013 Branch Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Versus Sakthi Santhanam & Another Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court