Home   |   About us   |   Contact us   |   Request Callback  
 
   
ALREADY A MEMBER ?
Username
Password

Translate

This Page To:

 
THE BRANCH MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT V/S S. ANTHONY & ANOTHER, decided on Wednesday, November 16, 2016.
[ In the Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, C.M.A (MD) No. 1495 of 2006 & M.P. No. 1 of 2006. ] 16/11/2016
Judge(s) : S.M. SUBRAMANIAM
Advocate(s) : N. Murugesan. R1, S. Srinivasa Raghavan.
Judgment Full Text : Existing LawyerServices Members, kindly login above.

Non Members, Enter your email address:- and , to request this judgment.

Alternatively, you may send a request by email to info@lawyerservices.in for the Full Text of this Judgment (chargeable).

LawyerServices Facebook Page






#LawyerServices #bestlegalsoftware #legalsoftware #judgment #caselaw









    (Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 against the judgment and decree dated 10.06.2005 passed in M.C.O.P.No.140 of 2003 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Chief Judicial Magistrate) Sivagangai.)Judgment:1. The appellant/United India Insurance Company Limited filed the present civil miscellaneous appeal challenging the award passed in M.C.O.P.No. 140 of 2003 dated 10.06.2005 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Chief Judicial Magistrate) Sivagangai.2. It is the case of injury caused due to the accident that took place on 07.05.2003 at about 08.00. p.m near Baganeri – Sivagangai Road. The injured/victim filed a claim petition seeking compensation before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Chief Judicial Magistrate) Sivagangai. The Tribunal considering the facts and circumstances of the case awarded a sum of Rs.1 40 000/- as total compensation against which the appellant United India Insurance Company Limited preferred an appeal challenging the liability of the Insurance Company on the ground that the vehicle which met with an accident was not involved in the accident.3. On reading of the deposition and the finding of the Tribunal this Court is of the view that such ground need not be entertained at this point of time and the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is just and proper and deserves no modification.4. In the result this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed. No costs. The award passed in M.C.O.P.No.140 of 2003 dated 10.06.2005 by the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Chief Judicial Magistrate) Sivagangai is confirmed. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.5. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant/Insurance Company represented that the entire award amount had already been deposited. Hence the respondent/claimant is permitted to withdraw the entire award amount with proportionate accrued interest and costs through RTGS (Real Time Gross Settlement) by filing necessary application before the Tribunal concerned.