Home   |   About us   |   Contact us   |   Request Callback  
 
   
ALREADY A MEMBER ?
Username
Password

Translate

This Page To:

 
RAJEEV SHARMA V/S STATE OF RAJASTHAN, decided on Friday, July 17, 2015.
[ In the High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench, Criminal Misc. Petition No. 2458 of 2015. ] 17/07/2015
Judge(s) : PRASHANT KUMAR AGARWAL
Advocate(s) : Anil Upman. Jitendra Shrimali, P.P., Anil Darya, IO/SHO, Transport Nagar, Jaipur.
Judgment Full Text : Existing LawyerServices Members, kindly login above.

Non Members, Enter your email address:- and , to request this judgment.

Alternatively, you may send a request by email to info@lawyerservices.in for the Full Text of this Judgment (chargeable).

LawyerServices Facebook Page

Judgments that may be related:-


  Abdul Aziz & Another Versus Central Narcotics Bureau,   23/10/2017.  

  Kurian @ Jacob Versus Chellamma John & Others,   28/09/2017.  

  Ramandeep Kaur Versus Council of Scientific And Industrial Research (CSIR),   28/09/2017.  

  Radhey Shyam Dhakad Versus Jaivardhan Singh & Others,   12/09/2017.  

  Murari Lal Gupta & Others Versus State of Haryana & Others,   01/09/2017.  

  Dr. Ashok Sharma Versus State of M.P & Others,   24/08/2017.  

  Ashish Uppal @ Ashu & Others Versus State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Another,   10/07/2017.  

  Chairman & Managing Director FCI & Others Versus Jagdish Balaram Bahira & Others,   06/07/2017.  

  Neetu Harsh Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through the Secretary & Others,   04/05/2017.  

  Rajesh Versus The State of Rajasthan through P.P.,   21/04/2017.  

  Radheshyam Gurjar & Another Versus State (Local Self Dept) & Others,   18/04/2017.  

  Bishan Devi Tr. Lrs. Versus Delhi Development Authority & Others,   18/04/2017.  

  Manoj @ Raju VersusState of Rajasthan ,   28/03/2017.  

  Dr. Megehndra Sharma Versus State of Rajasthan through its Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Science and Technology, Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) & Another,   25/03/2017.  

  Manoj Kumar Meena & Another Versus State of Rajasthan through P.P. & Others,   25/03/2017.  

  Ram Kishan Fauji Versus State of Haryana & Others,   21/03/2017.  

  Anu S. Nair Versus The University of Kerala represented by its Registrar & Others,   21/02/2017.  

  Kishna Ram Versus State of Rajasthan & Others,   14/02/2017.  

  UCO Bank Versus M/s. Paras Agency & Another,   03/02/2017.  

  Atul Rana & Others Versus Chief Secretary & Others,   07/01/2017.  

  Pankaj @ Dhaniya @ Dhanraj Versus State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor,   29/11/2016.  

  M. Alexander Versus State of H.P,   21/09/2016.  

  Justice Sunanda Bhandare Foundation Versus Union of India & Another,   31/08/2016.  

  Santosh & Another Versus State of Uttar Pradesh,   26/08/2016.  

  Dayaram Khemkaran Verma Versus State of Gujarat & Another,   04/08/2016.  

  The State of Madhya Pradesh Versus Anil,   02/08/2016.  

  Subramanian Swamy Versus Union of India, Ministry of Law & Others,   13/05/2016.  

  Modern Dental College & Research Centre & Others Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & Others,   02/05/2016.  

  Sarasani Satyam Reddy & Others Versus The Union of India, rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice & Others,   29/04/2016.  

  Sunanda Bhandare Foundation Versus U.O.I. & Another,   26/04/2016.  

  Suresh Chand Gautam Versus State of Uttar Pradesh & Others,   11/03/2016.  

  The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Versus Amrit Lal Sharma & Another,   02/03/2016.  

  The Director, St. Stephens Hospital Versus Onkar Mal, L.Rs of Mrs. Seema Rani & Others,   17/02/2016.  

  K. Sowbaghya Versus Union of India, Ministry of Finance, North Block Department of Revenue & Others,   28/01/2016.  

  Gautam Sharma Versus Jawahar Lal Nehru University & Others,   19/01/2016.  

  Ishwari Prasad Versus Girdhari Lal & Another,   05/01/2016.  

  Holy Family English Medium L.P. School & Others Versus Employees? State Insurance Corporation, rep. by its Regional Director & Others,   23/12/2015.  

  Chhotu & Others Versus Board of Revenue & Others,   18/11/2015.  

  Sunny (Minor) Versus Raj Singh,   17/11/2015.  

  Krishma Bansal Versus State of Punjab & Others,   29/09/2015.  

  Krishma Bansal Versus State of Punjab & Others,   29/09/2015.  

  SP Tripathi IO NCB Versus Yudhister Kumar Alias Y Kumar & Others,   22/09/2015.  

  New Delhi Municipal Council Versus Prominent Hotels Limited,   11/09/2015.  

  Reju Versus State of Kerala represented by Circle Inspector of Police Eranakulam Town Police Station Through Public Prosecutor,   21/08/2015.  

  Ram Dayal @ Gudda Versus State of Rajasthan,   16/07/2015.  

  Riju Prasad Sarma & Others Versus State of Assam & Others,   07/07/2015.  

  Budhi Prakash Jain Versus Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co.,   06/07/2015.  

  Parivar Sewa Sanstha Versus Shiv Devi Prajapati ,   01/07/2015.  

  Raj Kumari Jawa Versus Parmod Kumar,   09/04/2015.  

  Vipulbhai M. Chaudhary Versus Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation Limited & Others,   19/03/2015.  




#LawyerServices #bestlegalsoftware #legalsoftware #judgment #caselaw

  "2015 (2) DC 203"  ==   " 2015 (43) RCR(Cri) 618"  ==   ""  







    1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The accused-petitioner has filed this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with a prayer to quash and set aside the investigation pending against him in respect of FIR No. 311/2009 registered at Police Station Transport Nagar Jaipur for the offences under Sections 420 487 & 120-B IPC read-with Sections 18(a)(i) 27(a)(i) 27(b)(i) 27(c) 27(d) 18(c)/27(b)(ii) of the Drugs & Cosmetics Act read-with Sections 102 103 & 104 of the Trade Mark Act and read-with Sections 63 & 65 of the Copy Right Act.3. Brief relevant facts for the disposal of this petition are that on a source information a raid was conducted on 23.12.2009 at a residential house by a competent officer under the provisions of the Drugs & Cosmetics Act 1940 and a large quantity of misbranded adulterated spurious drugs were found and two persons namely; Akram and Nisar were arrested and aforesaid FIR came to be registered.4. During the course of initial investigation it was found that two persons took the aforesaid house on rent for the purpose of manufacture and packaging of spurious drugs. On further investigation involvement of co-accused-Shri Navneet Sharma brother of the petitioner was found in the incident and he was arrested and on his information some more spurious drugs were recovered from a house situated at Gaziabad Uttar Pradesh and four more persons were arrested. After investigation charge-sheet was filed against as many as seven persons including brother of the petitioner-Shri Navneet Sharma for various offences and investigation against the petitioner and some other persons was kept pending under Section 173(8) Cr.P.C.5. It was submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that although FIR was registered in the year 2009 but till now no legally admissible evidence has been collected by the Investigating Agency even prima facie showing involvement of the petitioner in the said incident and his name has appeared only during the course of interrogation of one or two co-accused. It was further submitted that in the facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly in view of total absence of any legal evidence against the petitioner it is but abuse of process of law to keep investigation pending against the petitioner for an indefinite period and the same is liable to be quashed and set aside.6. On the other hand it was submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor that the petitioner is absconding from the very beginning and he could not be arrested although every effort was made by the Investigating Agency and therefore further evidence could not have been collected showing his involvement in the incident.7. On consideration of submissions made on behalf of the respective parties and the material made available for my perusal as well as the evidence so far collected during investigation which has been produced before me by way of case diary I find that there is no legally admissible evidence available on record showing even prima facie involvement of the petitioner in the said incident and it is but abuse of process of law to keep pending investigation against him. Merely because name of the petitioner appeared during the course of interrogation of one or two co-accused it cannot be said that the petitioner was involved in the incident in any manner.8. Consequently the misc. petition is allowed and in the investigation pending to the extent of the petitioner in respect of FIR No. 311/2009 registered at Police Station Transport Nagar Jaipur registered for the aforesaid offences is quashed and set aside.